微星 Raider GE68 HX 13VF 笔记本电脑评测：彻底改变设计
GE68HX 直接接替了去年的 GE67HX，采用了全新的内部结构和机箱设计。除了预计将采用的第 13 代 Raptor Lake-HX CPU 和 Nvidia Ada Lovelace GPU 取代旧的第 12 代 Alder Lake-HX 和 Ampere 选项外，新款机型还提供了更大的 16:10 16 英寸屏幕尺寸，而不是衰退的 16:9 15.6 英寸纵横比。
我们评测的机型为基本配置，配备酷睿 i7-13950HX、140 WGeForce RTX 4060 和 1080p 144 Hz IPS 显示屏，零售价约为 1700 美元，如果打折则为 1300 美元。高端配置包括酷睿 i9-13980HX、RTX 4090 和 1440p 240 Hz 显示屏，售价超过 3500 美元。
GE68HX 的竞争对手包括其他高端 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如 惠普 Omen 16,Alienware m16 R1, 联想Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8或 华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16.
更多微星评论：
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (Raider GE68 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13950HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.5 GHz, 183 W PL2 / Short Burst, 134 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2370 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP, GDDR6, 537.42, MUX, Optimus 1.0
Memory
32 GB
, SK hynix, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 46-45-45-89
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1900 x 1200 pixel 140 PPI, Chi Mei N160JME-GTK, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB, 1024 GB
Weight
2.701 kg, Power Supply: 1.001 kg
Price
1700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 1900x1200 | |
| 87.7 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.6 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.2 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Alienware m16 R1 AMD R9 7845HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 25.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
案例 - 比以前更大
这款机箱可以说是 17 英寸 突击者 GE78HX.机身前部的 LED 像素条取代了去年机型上的连续照明灯，而机身后部则采用了金色、红色和亮面装饰，更具风格。微星今年的目标之一是设计出更具视觉趣味的笔记本电脑，而不是越来越常见的黑色和简约美学。制造商在这方面取得了成功，因为 GE68HX 的设计无疑是独一无二的，与竞争对手的其他游戏笔记本电脑截然不同。
尽管所有的曲线和部件都构成了非一体式机身骨架，但机箱的刚性却非常出色。向键盘中心施压或试图扭转边角时，几乎不会产生弯曲，也听不到吱吱嘎嘎的声音。与去年的 GE67HX 相比，我们特别欣赏更大、更坚固的铰链，因为它能更好地延长使用寿命。
从下面的尺寸对比图中可以看出，新机型比即将上市的 GE67HX 更大、更重。事实上，GE68HX 是目前较大、较重的 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一。
连接性
端口选项与去年相比略有变化 GE67HX.GE67HX 有 3 个 USB-A 端口和 2 个 USB-C 端口，而 GE68HX 则有 2 个 USB-A 端口和 3 个 USB-C 端口。所有三个 USB-C 端口都支持 Displayport，但只有左侧边缘的端口兼容 Thunderbolt 4。
奇怪的是，微星在今年的设计中放弃了 Kensington 锁。也没有迷你 DisplayPort，这与Alienware m16 R1.
SD 读卡器
作为一款中高端游戏机型，内置的 SD 读卡器速度有点慢。从我们的 UHS-II 测试卡向台式机传输 1 GB 的图片需要 12 秒多一点，而同样的测试在 Alienware m16 R1则要快 2 倍以上。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
交流
标配的英特尔 AX211 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。在与 AXE11000 6 GHz 测试网络配对时，我们没有遇到任何连接问题。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1519 (1294-1612)
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1437 (725-1500)
网络摄像头
虽然 200 万像素的质量没有改变，但网络摄像头仍有一些不同之处。例如，快门现在是镜头旁边的物理滑块，而不是键盘上的电子开关。其次，现在还内置了红外传感器，以支持 Hello 功能。
15.9 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
维护
遗憾的是，微星笔记本电脑如今越来越难维修了。底部面板由 13 颗十字螺丝固定，其中一颗螺丝后面有一张防篡改贴纸。 防拆贴纸以防止最终用户进行维修。主要问题是面板边缘的塑料挂钩是倾斜的，与底座紧紧锁在一起，尤其是后部。这些挂钩很难拆卸，更难重新安装。
用户可以直接进入两个 M.2 2280 存储托架、两个 DDR5 SODIMM 插槽以及 WLAN 模块和电池。
配件和保修
除交流适配器和文件外，零售包装盒还包括一块清洁布。如果在美国购买，制造商提供一年有限保修。
输入设备 - 更大的单击板和新的指北针
键盘
与 GE67HX 相比，微星改进了键盘布局。现在，键盘上集成了数字小键盘，而 Ctrl 和 Fn 键也不再笨拙地挤在一起。遗憾的是，为了给新的数字键盘腾出空间，方向键的尺寸被缩小了。
在其他方面，QWERTY 主键之间的按键反馈非常出色，坚固而均匀。尤其是空格键和回车键的声音明显增大，手感更令人满意。
触摸板
单击板尺寸大幅增加，从仅有 10.5 x 6.5 厘米的 GE67HX 增加到 13 x 8.3 厘米。滑动非常流畅，反应灵敏，即使以较低的速度移动也几乎没有粘滞感。点击效果也令人满意，但反馈并不完全一致，因为按压中心位置时感觉更有冲击力，而按压底部四角时则感觉更有弹性。
显示屏 - 色彩不佳
Raider GE68HX 有两种不同的面板可供选择。我们的评测机配备了下面加粗的选项：
- 2560 x 1600、240 Hz、100% DCI-P3、3 毫秒、IPS
- 1920 x 1200、144 Hz、60% sRGB、11 毫秒、IPS
不推荐使用价格较低的 144 Hz 选项，因为它的色彩覆盖范围较窄，响应时间较慢，会产生较明显的重影。即使你不经常进行图形编辑，也很难忽略较浅的色彩。这种面板更适合便宜的游戏笔记本电脑，如 微星脉搏 17 等廉价游戏笔记本电脑。
值得注意的是，GE68HX 目前的所有配置都不支持 G-Sync。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei N160JME-GTK tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 311.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 301.8 cd/m² Minimum: 14.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 300.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 971:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9, calibrated: 2.04
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
43% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF Chi Mei N160JME-GTK, IPS, 1900x1200, 16" | MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 16-xf0376ng BOE0B81, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Alienware m16 R1 AMD BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 64% | 67% | 102% | 66% | 103% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 41.6 | 71.7 72% | 72.1 73% | 98.6 137% | 70.4 69% | 99.33 139% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.2 | 89.7 44% | 99.6 60% | 99.9 61% | 99.4 60% | 99.9 61% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43 | 75.2 75% | 72.3 68% | 88.9 107% | 72.5 69% | 90.01 109% |
| Response Times | 99% | 50% | 67% | 47% | -108% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 17.3 ? | 0.25 ? 99% | 12.3 ? 29% | 5.1 ? 71% | 12 ? 31% | 50.8 ? -194% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 24.2 ? | 0.4 ? 98% | 7.2 ? 70% | 9 ? 63% | 8.9 ? 63% | 29.6 ? -22% |
| PWM Frequency | 480.4 ? | 12000 | ||||
| Screen | 17% | 10% | 10% | 34% | 297% | |
| Brightness middle | 300.9 | 356.1 18% | 350 16% | 329 9% | 474.6 58% | 634 111% |
| Brightness | 302 | 358 19% | 338 12% | 317 5% | 445 47% | 627 108% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 99 6% | 91 -2% | 89 -4% | 86 -8% | 92 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.35 -13% | 0.32 -3% | 0.39 -26% | 0.03 90% | |
| Contrast | 971 | 1000 3% | 1028 6% | 1217 25% | 21133 2076% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 4.83 -5% | 3.29 28% | 3.71 19% | 2.12 54% | 0.89 81% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.6 | 7.94 55% | 8.47 52% | 7.23 59% | 4.73 73% | 1.79 90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.04 | 2.23 -9% | 2.82 -38% | 0.57 72% | 0.91 55% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 3.1 6% | 3.2 3% | 2.2 33% | 2.8 15% | 1.13 66% |
| Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.2 100% | 2.131 103% | 2.3 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.47 89% |
| CCT | 7151 91% | 5938 109% | 6317 103% | 6270 104% | 6542 99% | 6497 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 60% /
44% | 42% /
28% | 60% /
38% | 49% /
43% | 97% /
198% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏没有经过预校准，但平均色彩准确度还不错。使用 X-Rite 色差计自行校准面板后，平均灰度和色彩 DeltaE 值分别从 3.3 和 4.6 降至 2 和 2.04。由于面板的色彩空间有限，无论如何校准，在饱和度较高的情况下，色彩仍然会变得越来越不准确。蓝色可能是最严重的问题，因为它会略显紫色。您可以在上面免费下载我们的 ICM 配置文件。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 24.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 17.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8684 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
300 尼特的最大亮度与大多数游戏笔记本电脑相当。应避免阳光直射，否则颜色会变得暗淡。如果想获得更好的室外可视性，用户可以考虑 Zephyrus M16 及其 2 倍亮度的显示屏。
业绩--令人印象深刻的同比增长
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式，并将微星中心设置为极致性能模式和 dGPU 模式。微星中心是系统更新、重要信息、电源配置文件、GPU 模式等的控制中心。不过，RGB 设置由名为 SteelSeries GG 的单独应用程序处理。
Cooler Boost 是极致性能模式下的一个子菜单设置。启用后，无论屏幕负载如何，内部风扇都将以最大转速运行。
RTX 4060 配置支持 MUX，但不支持高级优化，这意味着在 dGPU、MSHybrid 和 iGPU 模式之间切换时需要重启。
处理器
CPU 性能和时钟频率稳定性都非常出色，比平均水平快 5% 至 10酷睿 i9-13950HX快 5%至 10%，或比我们数据库中的 酷睿 i7-13700H快近 2 倍。这是目前市场上速度最快的移动 CPU 之一，可与 Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7945HX竞争前三名。
升级到价格更高的 酷睿 i9-13980HX根据我们使用 Alienware m18 R1 的情况，升级到价格更高的酷睿 i9-13980HX 预计只能提升约 5% 的性能。其优势微乎其微，因此我们建议坚持使用酷睿 i9-13950HX 以节省几百美元。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4437 (4343.11-4631.77)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Intel Core i7-12800HX: Ø3215 (3163.31-3383.24)
HP Omen 16-xf0376ng AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2531 (2518.1-2561.97)
Alienware m16 R1 AMD AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX: Ø4276 (4198.59-4320.12)
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2707 (2663.47-2966.92)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2914 (2871.5-3068.66)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=7) | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=7) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
系统性能
PCMark 基准测试结果与其他 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑相当，例如 Alienware m16 R1 或 联想Legion Slim 7i 16仅相差几个百分点。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到从睡眠中唤醒的问题或其他明显的问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU () | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 8281 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (61938 - 78494, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (62368 - 86207, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (59501 - 80441, n=7) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (84.4 - 99.5, n=7) | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时，LatencyMon 显示了 DPC 问题。以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频时，在 60 秒的窗口中记录到 4 个丢帧，这是不完美的。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的设备配备了更便宜的 1 TB 三星 PM9B1而不是价格更高的三星 PM9A1，可能是为了节省成本。PM9B1 的速度几乎只有 PM9A1 的一半，最大连续读取速度约为 3600 MB/s，而 PM9A1 约为 7000 MB/s。不过，固态硬盘性能稳定，没有节流现象。
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
3652MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
2897MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
2698MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
2642MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
2112MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
1872MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
75.4MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
233MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
3637MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
| HP Omen 16-xf0376ng | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF -11! | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB: Ø3637 (3048.84-3661.23)
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø7068 (6691.59-7088.79)
图形处理器性能
我们的 RTX 4060表现出色，其性能略高于我们数据库中配备相同 GPU 的普通游戏笔记本电脑。升级到 RTX 4070、4080 或 4090 预计性能将比 RTX 4060 分别提升 10%至 20%、60%至 80%、80%至 100%。RTX 4070 和 4080 之间的性能差距最大。
令人讨厌的是，微星将 MSI Center 设置为只要检测到 3DMark 正在运行，就会自动切换到极致性能模式，但遗憾的是，没有简单的禁用方法。我们认为这很令人沮丧，因为它剥夺了最终用户的控制权。运行游戏时不会自动切换。
启用 Cooler Boost 似乎不会对 CPU 或 GPU 性能产生重大影响，如下Fire Strike 结果所示。因此，该功能对实现最高性能并不重要，只有在需要更低运行温度时才建议使用。
| 电源配置文件 | Fire Strike 图形 | Fire Strike 物理 | 综合得分 |
| 极致性能模式（开启 Cooler Boost） | 27127 | 41525 | 11480 |
| 极致性能模式（冷却器增强功能关闭） | 27183 (0%) | 41254 (-1%) | 10278 (-10%) |
| 电池电量 | 19528 (-28%) | 18623 (-55%) | 5986 (-48%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 31914 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24416 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11240 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与 RTX 2060和 RTX 3060 一样，RTX 4060 非常适合 1080p60 游戏。所有测试过的游戏在 1080p 最高设置下都运行得很好，但《Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart》等更新、要求更高的游戏往往会降至 60 FPS 以下。在这种情况下，建议降低设置或使用 DLSS，特别是因为主显示屏不支持 G-Sync。
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | The Witcher 3 | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Far Cry 5 | Strange Brigade | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | F1 22 | Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (164.4 - 235, n=9) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (116 - 192.3, n=9) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (86.6 - 121.2, n=10) | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (67.5 - 92.7, n=11) | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (314 - 556, n=28) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| MSI Raider GE68HX 13VF | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (176.4 - 369, n=28) | |
| HP Victus 16-r0076TX | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
| Lenovo Legion C7 15IMH05 82EH0030GE | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
| Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
| Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |