结论——纯粹的性能，仅配备极简的豪华配置
Crosshair A16 HX 在性能方面表现出色，尤其作为一款中端 AMD-NVIDIA 游戏笔记本电脑。尽管它基于较旧的 Zen 4 平台，但 锐龙 9 8940HX 处理器的性能甚至超越了更新的 Ryzen AI 9 470 Zen 5 处理器，同时其性能与价格更高的英特尔 Core Ultra 9 275HX的性能差距控制在5%至10%以内。机身设计的物理升级同样是积极的进步，该机型不仅提供了更多的接口、更大的触控板，其设计也比基于英特尔平台的 Crosshair 16 HX ，便于携带。
配备95% P3色域的1600p240 IPS显示屏也值得一提。我们很欣赏所有当前配置均搭载了同样高品质的面板——甚至包括入门级的RTX 5060型号，因此买家无需担心会遇到仅支持45% NTSC色域的低端选项。
尽管性能和机身设计都有了显著提升，但 Crosshair A16 HX 仍是一款定位于入门级的产品，因此一些成本削减之处依然显而易见。 尤其是那款暗淡的塑料机身，极易留下指纹；而音质欠佳的扬声器，以及缺乏G-Sync、Advanced Optimus、HDR和单键RGB背光等功能，则严重影响了整体的游戏体验。 240 W 的交流适配器显得有些小，因为这款功耗较高的笔记本在游戏时的平均功耗已接近 250 W，这导致适配器温度过高，且电池续航时间普遍较短。
Pros
+ 易于维护；配备2个可轻松访问的M.2 2280 SSD插槽和2个SODIMM插槽
+ 高品质IPS显示屏，覆盖95% DCI-P3色域
+ 接口数量多于上一代机型
+ 处理器性能出色
+ 支持PCIe 5.0 SSD
Cons
- 出厂时屏幕的校准效果可以更好一些
- 考虑到价格，机身质感显得有些廉价
- 不支持Advanced Optimus或G-Sync技术
- 游戏时会显示充电状态
- 扬声器音质较弱
$2,699.00
msi Crosshair A16 HX 16” 2.5K QHD+ 240Hz Gaming Laptop – AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, 32GB DDR5, 1TB NVMe SSD, Wi-Fi 6E, USB-C, Windows 11 Home: Gunmetal Grey E8WGK-009US
Crosshair A16 HX 是基于英特尔平台的 Crosshair 16 HX的AMD版本。尽管如此，这两款机型在内外设计上仍存在若干差异。与价格更高的Raider或Titan系列相比，Crosshair系列是微星（MSI）旗下较为亲民的游戏本系列。
我们测试的这台机器属于高端配置，搭载了锐龙 9 8940HX Zen 4 处理器、115 WGeForce RTX 5070 显卡以及 1600p IPS 显示屏，售价约为 2700 美元。 低配版本则搭载RTX 5060显卡，但所有配置均采用相同的IPS显示屏。
同类竞品包括其他经济型至中端游戏本，例如 华硕TUF系列、 外星人 16 Aurora，以及 宏碁 Nitro V 16。
更多微星评测：
规格
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX 16c/32t, 16 x 5.3 GHz AMD Zen 4, 102 W PL2 / Short Burst, 102 W PL1 / Sustained, Dragon Range refresh (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Core: 1525 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR7, 610.47, MUX switch
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, Samsung, 42-42-42-84, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AU Optronics B160QAN02.3, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, 1024 GB
Weight
2.259 kg, Power Supply: 749 g
Price
2700 USD
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
机身主要采用哑光黑色塑料材质，为节省成本，未配备多余的RGB灯效。显示屏铰链最大可打开约150度。
连接性
沟通
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1555-1755) MBit/s
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1781 (1713-1841) MBit/s
网络摄像头
4.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
10 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
10 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
维护
输入设备
显示
该机型采用与基于英特尔平台的 Crosshair 16 HX AI 相同的 AU Optronics 制造的 B160QAN02.3 IPS 面板。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AU Optronics B160QAN02.3 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 512.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 475.9 cd/m² Minimum: 26.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 512.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1314:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.65 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
83.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
94.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.57
CCT: 6813 K
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK AU Optronics B160QAN02.3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG AUO B160QAN02.3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Samsung 160HU05, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 ATNA60HU02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) BOE0D86 (NS160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Samsung ATNA60DL03-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 6% | 5% | -13% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 94.9 | 95.5 1% | 99.6 5% | 99.2 5% | 72.5 -24% | 99.9 5% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.3 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 83.1 | 83.9 1% | 93.9 13% | 90.2 9% | 70.4 -15% | 96.5 16% |
| Response Times | 19% | 94% | 82% | -7% | 96% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 4.2 ? | 3.59 ? 15% | 0.29 ? 93% | 1.41 ? 66% | 6.8 ? -62% | 0.2 ? 95% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 9.2 ? | 7.09 ? 23% | 0.45 ? 95% | 0.25 ? 97% | 4.8 ? 48% | 0.25 ? 97% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1439.8 ? | 1440 ? | 960 | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 29 | 44 | 50 | |||
| Screen | -24% | 15% | 242% | 18% | 97% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 512.4 | 472 -8% | 380.5 -26% | 499 -3% | 517 1% | 390 -24% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 476 | 438 -8% | 384 -19% | 502 5% | 490 3% | 394 -17% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 89 | 88 -1% | 98 10% | 98 10% | 92 3% | 98 10% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.39 | 0.4 -3% | 0.02 95% | 0.39 -0% | 0.04 90% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1314 | 1180 -10% | 24950 1799% | 1326 1% | 9750 642% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.65 | 6.07 -31% | 3.27 30% | 2.5 46% | 1.62 65% | 1.61 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.33 | 9.76 -17% | 6.31 24% | 7.8 6% | 3.52 58% | 3.49 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 2.25 -73% | 1.1 15% | 1.62 -25% | 1.59 -22% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 6.4 -64% | 1 74% | 4.7 -21% | 1.85 53% | 1.2 69% |
| Gamma | 2.57 86% | 2.52 87% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.36 93% | 2.235 98% |
| CCT | 6813 95% | 7987 81% | 6410 101% | 6715 97% | 6596 99% | 6580 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-13% | 38% /
26% | 110% /
163% | -1% /
8% | 67% /
77% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 4.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7772 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表现
测试条件
系统出厂时默认设置为“性能”模式，且“Apex”模式处于激活状态。在运行以下基准测试之前，我们还将系统设置为“独立显卡”模式。
处理器性能
Cinebench R15 多循环测试
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø5290 (5233.55-5355.47) Points
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø5246 (4918.23-5393.74) Points
Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus: Ø5102 (4340.28-5617.19) Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470: Ø3496 (3345.88-3542.33) Points
Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Intel Core 7 240H: Ø2303 (2241.02-2401.39) Points
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX: Ø4296 (4180.6-4737.09) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK -1! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 -1! | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 -1! | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (43311 - 53747, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (171374 - 218716, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (7988 - 9427, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (169334 - 172010, n=2) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (26855 - 29886, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (90684 - 117231, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (150768 - 175214, n=3) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (1784 - 2122, n=3) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (23193 - 28773, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (18283 - 35274, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 -3! | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 -3! | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (8106 - 11334, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (11371 - 11393, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (9492 - 21327, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (13392 - 16259, n=2) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1977 - 2011, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1844 - 1869, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (2225 - 2298, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (1680 - 1709, n=2) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (274 - 322, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (230 - 283, n=2) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (474 - 507, n=2) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 11334 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7314 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6090 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
495 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
459 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3296 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
4006 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
61.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
165.1 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7221 (5839.38-7264.12) MB/s
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6532 (3454.23-6827.28) MB/s
GPU性能
| 功耗概况 | 图形性能得分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式，Cooler Boost开启，Apex开启 | 14087 | 13104 | 13930 |
| 性能模式，Cooler Boost 关闭，Apex 开启 | 14118 (-0%) | 13154 (-0%) | 13964 (-0%) |
| 性能模式，Cooler Boost 关闭，Apex 关闭 | 13991 (-1%) | 13109 (-0%) | 13851 (-0%) |
| 平衡模式 | 13451 (-5%) | 12174 (-7%) | 13242 (-5%) |
| 电池电量 | 4400 (-69%) | 6518 (-50%) | 4625 (-67%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 37786 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 71413 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 35205 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13964 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3087 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | F1 24 | Baldur's Gate 3
《赛博朋克2077》超高清帧率图表
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø99.7 (95.2-101.8) fps
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø100.1 (94.9-101.9) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 187.6 | 186.6 | 184.6 | 152.6 | 129.7 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 240 | 208 | 199.1 | 183.3 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 229 | 187.8 | 140 | 102 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 141.9 | 131.5 | 104.8 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 502 | 369 | 305 | 258 | 170.4 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 239 | 183.9 | 154.6 | 133.2 | 129.6 | 90.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 173.8 | 149 | 124.8 | 112.1 | 81.9 | 68.8 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 345 | 336 | 269 | 94.7 | 93.1 | 59.3 |
排放
系统噪声
Noise level
| Idle |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.7 / 59 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 3% | 10% | 11% | -2% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.4 | 25.56 -9% | 23.4 -0% | 24.5 -5% | 23 2% | 24 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 29.1 | 28.3 3% | 23.8 18% | 24.5 16% | 23 21% | 24 18% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29.1 | 28.3 3% | 23.8 18% | 24.5 16% | 24.35 16% | 30 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29.1 | 28.3 3% | 31.4 -8% | 27.1 7% | 24.35 16% | 35 -20% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 41.7 | 50.26 -21% | 48.7 -17% | 34.6 17% | 34.77 17% | 53 -27% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 58.7 | 57.8 2% | 51.5 12% | 53 10% | 56.18 4% | 52 11% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 59 | 57.95 2% | 59.8 -1% | 53 10% | 56.43 4% | 54 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
ⓘ Notebookcheck
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.8 °C / -5.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.8 °C / -5.1 F).
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | 10% | 7% | -2% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41.8 | 44.8 -7% | 48.2 -15% | 44.9 -7% | 42 -0% | 47 -12% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 50.6 | 43.4 14% | 41 19% | 50.5 -0% | 49 3% | 55 -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30.8 | 31.2 -1% | 28.2 8% | 27.3 11% | 34 -10% | 28 9% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 36 | 28.8 20% | 26.2 27% | 27.5 24% | 36 -0% | 29 19% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在“性能”模式下进行游戏时，CPU和GPU的平均温度分别在80多度中段和80多度低段。如果改用“平衡”模式运行，核心温度会低几摄氏度，但平均TGP会从113 W降至99 W，同时图形性能也会相应降低。
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲状态 | -- | -- | 56 | 44 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 4.1 | -- | 82 | 55 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 4.4 | ~2047 | 96 | 79 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试（平衡模式） | 1.1 | 2467 | 73 | 78 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试（关闭Apex，性能模式） | 1.5 | 2512 | 84 | 81 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试（开启Apex，性能模式） | 1.4 | 2685 | 85 | 79 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试（开启《Apex》，散热增强模式） | 1.6 | 2625 | 85 | 80 |
演讲嘉宾
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.05 / 0.9 Watt |
| Idle | 12.3 / 17.1 / 42.4 Watt |
| Load |
130.2 / 264.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Lenovo UMIS AM541 1TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BTW, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | 22% | 42% | 3% | 37% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 12.3 | 26.2 -113% | 6.9 44% | 5.7 54% | 21.5 -75% | 3.9 68% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 17.1 | 33.8 -98% | 8.1 53% | 8.7 49% | 28.3 -65% | 11 36% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 42.4 | 34 20% | 31 27% | 9.1 79% | 26.3 38% | 16.9 60% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 130.2 | 112 14% | 131.6 -1% | 88.7 32% | 92.5 29% | 123 6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 246 | 224 9% | 198.3 19% | 160.3 35% | 165 33% | 152.7 38% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 242 | 220 9% | 172.1 29% | 156.9 35% | 158 35% | 144.9 40% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 264.3 | 315 -19% | 300.1 -14% | 234.9 11% | 195 26% | 229 13% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗测试：《赛博朋克》/压力测试
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø250 (215-264) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø215 (207-315) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.3 (5.78-21.1) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø34.2 (33.1-42.1) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø246 (235-263) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø224 (198-250) Watt
外部显示器的功耗
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø166 (161.3-168.2) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø175.3 (133.9-207) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø170.5 (170.1-171.1) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.3 (192.4-194.5) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø161.7 (153.6-163.8) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.6 (191.3-201) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø189.9 (178.5-202) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø146.4 (136.8-154.8) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.9 (5.31-30.4) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17.6 (10.8-24.3) Watt
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø242 (230-260) Watt
MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø220 (189.6-238) Watt
电池续航时间
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 96 Wh | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 84 Wh | Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 76 Wh | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 76 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 102% | 35% | 67% | 51% | -9% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.5 | 11.1 102% | 7.4 35% | 9.2 67% | 8.3 51% | 5 -9% |
| H.264 (h) | 14.2 |
Notebookcheck 评分
Crosshair A16 是微星（MSI）旗下较为实惠的游戏本之一，它优先考虑性能和显示效果，而非辅助功能或豪华配置，以此来降低成本。
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK
- 07/03/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 82.5%  | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,629.00 List Price: 2700 USD | 2.3 kg | 25.55 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 81.9%  | MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2500 EUR | 2.5 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
3. 85.9%  | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 3000 USD | 2.6 kg | 23.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
4. 86.4%  | Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2500€ | 1.8 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
5. 81%  | Gigabyte Gaming A16 Pro GA6DH (Core 7 240H, RTX 5070 Ti) Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2300 Euro | 2.4 kg | 22.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
6. 82%  | Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI PHN16S-71-94L9 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2400 EUR | 2.2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
