结论 — 硬件出色，图形性能不足
HyperX Omen 15 是中端游戏本类别中一个颇具吸引力的选择。它的优势在于出色的 3K OLED 显示屏，以及尽管采用塑料表面却依然亮眼的外观。较大的重量无疑有其弊端，但也带来了较轻的经济型游戏本往往欠缺的质感。宽敞舒适的键盘和便于维护的设计也值得称赞，它们充分利用了相对厚实的机身。
最大的短板可以说是 85 W 的 GeForce RTX 5070，面对清晰锐利的 3K 1800p 显示屏，它的性能显得有些不足。虽然较老的游戏运行良好，但 Forza Horizon 6 或 Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced 等较新的游戏在 1440p 或更高分辨率下就开始力不从心，即使启用 DLSS 超分辨率或 FG 帧生成也是如此。因此，要在原生 3K 分辨率下游玩，你需要比平时更仔细地微调各项设置。
其他搭载完全相同 RTX 5070 GPU 的游戏笔记本通常比我们测试的 Omen 15 快 10% 至 20%，例如 Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11，甚至 HP 自家的 HyperX Omen 16 也是如此。这一差距主要源于大多数其他游戏本机型提供了更高的 TGP 上限。
遗憾的是，目前的 Omen 15 没有提供 RTX 5070 Ti 配置选项，否则就能解决我们对这款机型最主要的不满。根据我们的温度和功耗测试结果，现有机身设计具备支持 RTX 5070 Ti 的潜力。然而，用户若想获得比标准 RTX 5070 更高的显卡配置，就必须升级到价格更高、体积也更大的 Omen Max 系列。
Pros
+ 能效高；对于游戏笔记本电脑而言，电池续航良好
+ 可升级的 2x SODIMM + 2x M.2 2280 SSD
+ 高品质 1800p120 HDR OLED 显示屏
+ 相对较大的方向键和数字键盘
+ 运行温度总体较低
Cons
- 即使在游戏笔记本电脑中也属于体积较大、重量较重的机型
- 内置接口较少；不支持 Thunderbolt
- 没有 GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 配置可选
- TGP 上限相对较低
- 显示屏不支持 G-Sync
$2,299.99
HP HyperX OMEN 15 Gaming Laptop, 15.3" WUXGA IPS 165Hz, Intel Core 5 210H (8-Core, Up to 4.8 GHz), 64GB DDR5, 1TB SSD, GeForce RTX 5050 8GB GDDR7, Wi-Fi 7, OMEN Tempest Cooling, Windows 11
HyperX Omen 15 属于 HP 的中端游戏笔记本系列，与定位较低的 Victus 系列和面向发烧友的 Omen Max 系列形成区分。我们上一次评测 15 英寸 Omen 机型还要追溯到 2021 年，因此这期间发生了不少变化。
我们的测试机型采用顶配配置，搭载 Core Ultra 9 386H Panther Lake CPU、85 W GeForce RTX 5070 GPU 和 1800p 120 Hz OLED 显示屏，售价约为 2150 美元。较低配置的 SKU 可能配备分辨率更低的 IPS 显示屏或性能较弱的 RTX 显卡。
这一市场的竞争机型包括其他入门至中端游戏笔记本，例如 Acer Nitro V 15、Gigabyte G5 KF5 或 MSI Cyborg 15。
更多 HP 评测：
规格
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 9 386H 16c/16t, 4 x 4.9 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core, 8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core, 4 x 3.5 GHz Intel Darkmont LP E-Core, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Panther Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1792 MHz, RAM: 1525 MHz, 85 W TDP, GDDR7, 592.82, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-5600, 2x SODIMM, Dual-Channel
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 222 PPI, Samsung SDC422E, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Panther Lake-H PCH
Weight
2.271 kg, Power Supply: 644 g
Price
2000 USD
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
连接性
尽管机身尺寸较大，接口配置却有些简陋。此外，请注意，后侧的 USB-C 接口不支持 Thunderbolt，这可能是为了控制成本。
通信
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr; iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2190 (1133-2292) MBit/s
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr; iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1809 (1747-1840) MBit/s
网络摄像头
2 MP 摄像头集成了红外功能，但没有隐私遮挡盖。
12.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
22 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
维护
可升级组件包括两个 DDR5 SODIMM 插槽和两个 M.2 PCIe4 2280 SSD 插槽。后者尤其值得注意，因为如下图所示，即使是尺寸更大的 Omen 16 也不支持安装两块全长 2280 M.2 SSD。
可持续性
键盘的部分组件由消费后回收塑料制成，而包装主要采用纸板和纸张，仅交流电源适配器的包装使用了少量塑料。
配件和保修
包装盒内除了电源适配器和相关文件外，没有其他配件。产品享有常规的一年有限保修。
输入设备
该机型采用了近期 Omen 16 的键盘和点击板，带来相同的打字体验，不过字体略有变化。
显示
提供以下三种显示屏选项，均标配 VRR 支持。所有选项均不支持触控或 G-Sync。
- 1920 x 1200, 165 Hz, IPS, 400 尼特, 100% sRGB, 雾面
- 2560 x 1600, 180 Hz, IPS, 500 尼特, 100% sRGB, 雾面
- 2880 x 1800, 120 Hz, OLED, 500 尼特 SDR, 1100 尼特 HDR, 100% DCI-P3, 亮面
其中，OLED 面板在分辨率和 HDR 支持方面优于其他中端游戏笔记本电脑上的大多数屏幕。不过，不看重完整 P3 色域的用户可以考虑分辨率较低、价格更实惠的 IPS 选项，尤其是考虑到它们与 RTX 5070 的搭配可能更为合适，而且反光也远没有那么明显。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung SDC422E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 489.6 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 482.2 cd/m² Minimum: 23.5 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 480.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.14 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
94.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6482 K
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Samsung SDC422E, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 EF25QBA63.E, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3", 165 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 BOEhydis NE156FHM-NXA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 165 Hz | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Sharp SHP153F (LQ156M1JW30), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 360 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | -52% | -48% | -20% | -52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.5 | 99.9 0% | 40.3 -59% | 43.4 -56% | 67.9 -32% | 43 -57% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 60.3 -40% | 64.8 -35% | 98.9 -1% | 64.3 -36% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.7 | 94.1 -1% | 41.6 -56% | 44.9 -53% | 68.8 -27% | 34.7 -63% |
| Response Times | 20% | -4811% | -3706% | -1654% | -3798% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.54 ? | 0.41 ? 24% | 39 ? -7122% | 27.6 ? -5011% | 13 ? -2307% | 28.6 ? -5196% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.8 ? | 0.65 ? 19% | 20.8 ? -2500% | 20 ? -2400% | 8.8 ? -1000% | 20 ? -2400% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 959.32 ? | 1298.2 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 30 | 25 17% | ||||
| Screen | -22% | -92% | -137% | -59% | -131% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 480.4 | 484.5 1% | 382 -20% | 286 -40% | 342 -29% | 324 -33% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 482 | 495 3% | 347 -28% | 272 -44% | 308 -36% | 303 -37% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 95 -3% | 86 -12% | 87 -11% | 87 -11% | 87 -11% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.26 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.14 | 3.4 -8% | 4.34 -38% | 4.61 -47% | 2.46 22% | 4.7 -50% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.13 | 6.01 2% | 19.19 -213% | 19.59 -220% | 4.12 33% | 18.19 -197% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 1.6 -129% | 2.4 -243% | 3.9 -457% | 3.03 -333% | 3.9 -457% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.165 102% | 2.236 98% | 2.51 88% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6482 100% | 6762 96% | 7024 93% | 6792 96% | 7056 92% | 7541 86% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.59 | 3.56 | 2.99 | 0.82 | 2.93 | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1232 | 1682 | 1179 | 1246 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-6% | -1652% /
-939% | -1297% /
-761% | -578% /
-338% | -1327% /
-776% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏出厂时针对 P3 标准的校准非常出色，灰阶和色彩的平均 deltaE 值分别仅为 0.7 和 3.14。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.38 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.42 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.27 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 959.32 Hz Amplitude: 30 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 959.32 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 959.32 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7600 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 Omen Gaming Hub 设置为性能模式。
处理器性能
Core Ultra 9 386H 的原始多线程性能与上一代冠军 Core i9-14900HX 仅相差 10% 至 15%，同时功耗却低得多。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø3196 (3160.31-3337.51) Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX: Ø3928 (3877.47-3971.8) Points
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1674 (1645.82-1778.57) Points
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H: Ø1654 (1417.03-1799.86) Points
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2161 (2113.38-2395.78) Points
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1493 (1461.13-1737.69) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 -1! | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M24) -3! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -3! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -1! | |
| Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH -3! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng -1! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -1! | |
| MSI Thin GF63 12VE -3! | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (873 - 1271, n=11) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (118.1 - 126.8, n=11) | |
| Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Early 24) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Cinebench 2026 / CPU Multi | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (3799 - 5151, n=7) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 -1! | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -1! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -1! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (10001 - 21921, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (53370 - 113595, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2776 - 5604, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5314 - 7333, n=11) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (28414 - 61578, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (46362 - 72112, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (669 - 1287, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5138 - 11672, n=11) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (54042 - 89891, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4051 - 4858, n=10) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Quantized GPU 1.7
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Quantized GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -5! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -5! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -5! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng -3! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9701 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75437 - 129946, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (81021 - 118858, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75959 - 135096, n=11) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (87.2 - 118.6, n=11) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Samsung MZVMX1T0HCLD PCIe4 SSD 在 CDM 基准测试中出现了异常的写入结果，多次尝试后仍然如此。除此之外，它在日常使用以及运行包括 DiskSpd 在内的其他基准测试时均表现正常。
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3659 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
230.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
504.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
233.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2124 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
254.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
53.41 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
140.1 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3841 (3086.08-4829.94) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6059 (2747.27-7103.05) MB/s
GPU 性能
由于大多数配备同款 GeForce RTX 5070 的游戏笔记本电脑的显卡功耗通常为 100 W 或更高，我们这台 HP 机型采用的 85 W 版本性能略逊一筹，平均仅落后几个百分点。如下方的 Fire Strike 表格所示，使用更安静的平衡模式而非性能模式运行，会使图形性能进一步下降 8%。
| 电源模式 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 33399 | 29525 | 11398 |
| 平衡模式 | 30778 (-8%) | 29430 (-0%) | 11330 (-1%) |
| 电池供电 | 23779 (-29%) | 21560 (-27%) | 7778 (-32%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 33758 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52108 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27540 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 12675 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2588 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -2! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
Forza Horizon 6 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | F1 24 | Cyberpunk 2077 | Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced
| Forza Horizon 6 | |
| 1920x1080 medium AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (105 - 118, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| 1920x1080 extreme AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (74 - 77, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 extreme + RT AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (23 - 42, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 extreme + RT AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (15 - 25, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 extreme + RT + DLSS perf. AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (18 - 30, n=2) | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (63.8 - 94.7, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40.3 - 60, n=21) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA KFA2 GeForce RTX 5070 1-Click OC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (62.9 - 94, n=18) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (47 - 47, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing + DLSS Balanced AA:T | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (34 - 35, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr | |
Cyberpunk 2077 超高画质 FPS 图表
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø99.9 (89.2-101.8) fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø109.4 (102.3-111.3) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 181.8 | 175.2 | 130.8 | 114.4 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 163.6 | 147.7 | 144.1 | 137.1 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 208 | 160.3 | 124.6 | 92.6 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 105.7 | 97.5 | 80.4 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 457 | 317 | 265 | 228 | 153 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 170.5 | 145 | 128.9 | 129.2 | 127.1 | 86.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 139.6 | 123.2 | 106.8 | 96.9 | 68.2 | 59.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 224 | 239 | 220 | 80.1 | 78.3 | 51.7 |
| Forza Horizon 6 (2026) | 105 | 77 | 42 | 30 | 25 | |
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced (2026) | 80 | 72 | 47 | 62 | 34 |
排放
系统噪声
游戏时的风扇噪音与竞品相近，处于 50 dB(A) 出头的范围，这意味着尽管 HP 的温度低于预期，其运行噪音也并未更大。如果在性能较低的平衡模式下玩游戏，风扇噪音会从 52.3 dB(A) 大幅降至 46.4 dB(A)。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.7 / 52.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -8% | -2% | -2% | -1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.8 | 22.7 8% | 24 3% | 24 3% | 23 7% | 24 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.1 | 22.8 9% | 28 -12% | 25 -0% | 23 8% | 28 -12% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 22.8 9% | 29 -16% | 28 -12% | 23 8% | 29 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 26.6 -2% | 33 -27% | 33 -27% | 27.87 -7% | 30 -15% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 45.7 | 42.7 7% | 48 -5% | 44 4% | 54.82 -20% | 40 12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 52.3 | 52 1% | 52 1% | 45 14% | 54.82 -5% | 46 12% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 52.2 | 51.9 1% | 54 -3% | 50 4% | 54.82 -5% | 48 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
游戏时的表面温度比预期更低，最热处也仅在 35°C 左右。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.2 °C / 7.5 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.6 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+4.2 °C / 7.5 F).
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -41% | -33% | -47% | -61% | -34% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 33.8 | 42.2 -25% | 46 -36% | 46 -36% | 50 -48% | 43 -27% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 32.4 | 49 -51% | 49 -51% | 45 -39% | 66 -104% | 43 -33% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 22.8 | 31.8 -39% | 28 -23% | 36 -58% | 32 -40% | 37 -62% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 24.4 | 35.8 -47% | 30 -23% | 38 -56% | 37 -52% | 28 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
系统在开始运行 Prime95 压力测试时，频率、功耗和温度会提升至 3.4 GHz、80 W 和 88 C，随后在约 30 秒后降至 3.0 GHz、60 W 和 72 C，表明其睿频加速的持续能力有限。对于一款搭载 H 系列 CPU 的专用游戏笔记本电脑，我们原本期待更好的表现，但至少降幅相对较小。
在平衡模式和性能模式下运行 Cyberpunk 2077 时，GPU 功耗平均分别为 69 W 和 84 W，这与我们上述 3DMark 测试和风扇噪声观察结果一致。
| CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 41 | 38 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 3.0 | -- | 72 | 44 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 2.3 | 1837 | 66 | 61 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 压力测试（平衡模式） | 1.4 | 2182 | 61 | 61 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 压力测试（性能模式） | 1.8 | 2625 | 62 | 63 |
扬声器
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
能源管理
功耗
我们的 HP 机型在运行游戏时的功耗明显低于 Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11，降幅约为 25%。当然，Lenovo 机型配备了更快的 CPU，并为相同的 RTX 5070 设定了更高的 TGP 上限，因此平均游戏性能略胜一筹。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.84 Watt |
| Idle | 4.6 / 6.4 / 15.4 Watt |
| Load |
74.1 / 186.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -44% | -55% | -46% | -41% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.6 | 6.9 -50% | 16.8 -265% | 14.9 -224% | 5.2 -13% | 7.9 -72% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.4 | 8.3 -30% | 17.6 -175% | 16.3 -155% | 19.6 -206% | 9.2 -44% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 15.4 | 31 -101% | 19.8 -29% | 22.2 -44% | 23 -49% | 13.5 12% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 74.1 | 90.2 -22% | 66 11% | 72 3% | 84 -13% | 78 -5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 132.2 | 179.1 -35% | 106.5 19% | 90.3 32% | 144 -9% | 128.4 3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 131.8 | 179.7 -36% | 105 20% | 89.6 32% | 144 -9% | 126.7 4% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 186.7 | 247 -32% | 119 36% | 117 37% | 165 12% | 187 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 Cyberpunk / 压力测试
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø145.1 (132.9-186.7) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø199.4 (190.4-247) Watt
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.51 (4.51-6.6) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.8 (4.97-12.2) Watt
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø132.2 (122.9-141.3) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø179.1 (170.2-192.6) Watt
外接显示器功耗
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø107.7 (101.1-129.4) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø140.9 (135.3-150.5) Watt
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø113.7 (111.1-115.6) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø141.5 (138.5-143.5) Watt
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø119.6 (116.1-137) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.6 (136-152.5) Watt
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.66 (4.58-11.7) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.47 (4.37-9.63) Watt
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø131.8 (123.8-138.1) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø179.7 (168.7-195.4) Watt
电池续航时间
在设置为 iGPU 模式时，WLAN 续航时间略超 9 小时，高于游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平。
| HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 55.2 Wh | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -3% | -40% | -41% | -21% | -53% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.2 | 8.9 -3% | 5.5 -40% | 5.4 -41% | 7.3 -21% | 4.3 -53% |
| H.264 (h) | 6.1 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.1 |
Notebookcheck 评分
2026 款 HP HyperX Omen 15 将惊艳的 3K OLED 显示屏、坚固的机身和性能发挥略显不足的 GeForce RTX 5070 显卡融于一体。
HP Omen 15-ga0931nr
- 10/14/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 85.6%  | HP Omen 15-ga0931nr Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | List Price: 2000 USD | 2.3 kg | 23.6 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED |
2. 86.7%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 2300 USD | 1.9 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI OLED |
3. 73.7%  | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1049 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
4. 75.2%  | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1099 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.2 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
5. 76.3%  | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 899 Euro | 2 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
6. 75.8%  | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
