Aorus 15 YE5 评测:省钱的高端游戏笔记本电脑
仅凭低廉的价格,Aorus 15 YE 就已经是一款有趣的游戏笔记本电脑。从外观上看,它时尚纤薄,价格实惠,甚至还包括 Thunderbolt 4 和 DDR5。相比之下,它的内部则安装了(强劲的)上一代硬件,即不太高端的酷睿 i5-12500H和上一代 Nvidia 旗舰机型 RTX 3080 Ti.这一切使 Aorus 15 YE5 成为 1500 美元内最强大的游戏笔记本电脑之一。
尽管 Aorus 15 YE5 的 CPU 和 GPU 都是上一代产品,但它仍需要与当前的竞争对手一较高下,以证明自己是否能跟上时代的步伐,以及是否能真正做到物有所值。随后,我们将把它与目前配备RTX 4060 或RTX 4070 的笔记本电脑进行对比,如Aorus 15 BSF (RTX4070)、Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 (RTX 4060)、HP Victus 16 (RTX 4070)、HP Omen 16 (RTX 4080) 和更昂贵的Dell XPS 15 9530 (RTX 4070)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.6 % | 12/2023 | Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 27 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
85.7 % | 08/2023 | Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 20.9 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
85.7 % | 09/2023 | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.1 % | 09/2023 | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
90.3 % | 04/2023 | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3456x2160 | |
87.4 % | 07/2023 | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.6 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳与连接:现代而简约
从外观上看,Aorus 看起来相当现代和吸引人。这要归功于其黑色磨砂、纤薄的外观设计--尽管这款笔记本电脑实际上并没有那么纤薄(最多 27 毫米)。同时,它在时尚的同时还保持了独特性,例如,背部风扇栅格的结构和在那里出现的小橘色,以及特别设计的斜角边缘。银色的 Aorus 徽标将你的注意力吸引到设备顶部。机盖的前上边缘有一个小凹槽,用于放置网络摄像头和扬声器--此外,单手打开笔记本电脑时,它还能给你带来非常好的握持感。
机壳的所有侧面均由光滑的塑料制成。这看起来很棒,但与某些竞争对手相比,它不那么耐扭曲。当你在键盘上打字时,键盘不会有任何松动,这意味着它的稳定性总体上还不错。
我们没有打开 Aorus,因为两颗 Torx 螺钉被贴纸覆盖,我们不想为了借用的 Cyberport 而损坏这些螺钉。
连接性
Aorus 笔记本电脑的连接选项非常现代,同时也保持在最低水平。在三个 USB 端口中,只有一个是 Type-A,这还远远不够。反过来,两个 Type-C 端口中有一个支持 Thunderbolt 4。除了第四个 USB 接口外,该设备还缺少一个 SD 读卡器、一个 Kensington 锁和一个专用 DisplayPort(通过 USB-C 接口提供 2 个)。
尽管端口数量不多,但它们的布局并不理想--用于刚性网线的 RJ45 端口位于右侧,而且朝前。Aorus 背面的空间一如既往地没有使用。它只容纳了风扇插座。
WiFi 和摄像头
无论是 6 GHz(WiFi 6E)还是 5 GHz 网络,它的无线局域网传输速率都是同类产品中最高的。
遗憾的是,该设备的网络摄像头仍然是上一代产品:它的分辨率只有 720p,色彩偏差很大,控制中心也没有快门。
输入设备 - 多于实心,但有深色特殊按键标签
按键布局非常整齐--键盘略低于笔记本底座。方向键的大小也很正常,右侧还有一个数字小键盘。
按键只有中低升程,但在键入时仍然感觉出奇的舒适,这也得益于其良好的反馈。键入时的噪音偏小,因此也适用于低噪音环境。
按键的背光可以实现各种 RGB 效果,但不能为每个按键单独设置,不过这些按键可以为某些效果(雨滴)亮起不同的颜色。实用:如果按下 fn 键,所有可与 fn 键组合创建特殊功能的按键都会亮起。不过,只有普通按键的标签(如 "F7")会发光,而特殊功能("静音")则不会发光,这导致在黑暗环境中无法识别 F 键的特殊功能。
触摸板足够大(21.1 x 7.6 厘米),即使你的手没有完全干透,触摸起来也很顺滑。集成的点击按钮需要很大的力度,这意味着其压力点非常清晰。点击噪音适中。
显示屏 - 1440p,色彩准确度高
这款 Aorus 笔记本电脑的 WQHD 雾面显示屏由奇美公司制造,并已用于 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G15中使用过。这款产品非常成功,因此在 2023 年也不会显得过时。2560 x 1440 像素的分辨率、165Hz 的刷新率、相对较快的响应时间和色彩空间覆盖率(100% sRGB、97% Display P3)同样令人印象深刻。屏幕亮度和对比度则一般。此外,还有一款刷新率为 360 赫兹的全高清机型。
左下角和右上角边缘的背光出血现象非常明显,这一点不太理想。不过,PWM 并未用于亮度控制。其响应时间充其量只能算一般。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 350 cd/m²
Contrast: 939:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.61
ΔE Greyscale 3.67 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Chi Mei CMN1540 (CMN N156KME-GNA), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Aorus 15 BSF Sharp LQ156T1JW05, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 BOE08B3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Victus 16-r0077ng CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60 | HP Omen 16-wf000 BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -21% | -18% | 6% | -16% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.7 | 98.2 1% | 64 -34% | 66.7 -32% | 99.8 2% | 69 -29% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 93.2 -7% | 98 -2% | 100 0% | 99.2 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.9 | 85.7 0% | 66 -23% | 69 -20% | 98.4 15% | 71.2 -17% |
Response Times | 40% | 55% | 30% | 87% | 47% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 18.9 ? | 11.3 ? 40% | 5 ? 74% | 13.3 ? 30% | 1.68 ? 91% | 4.6 ? 76% |
Response Time Black / White * | 11.7 ? | 7 ? 40% | 7.55 ? 35% | 8.2 ? 30% | 1.94 ? 83% | 9.7 ? 17% |
PWM Frequency | 239 | |||||
Screen | -34% | -28% | 15% | -36% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 357 | 299 -16% | 346 -3% | 308 -14% | 389.5 9% | 310.9 -13% |
Brightness | 322 | 282 -12% | 324 1% | 285 -11% | 392 22% | 296 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 82 1% | 90 11% | 85 5% | 98 21% | 91 12% |
Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.31 18% | 0.35 8% | 0.25 34% | 0.35 8% | |
Contrast | 939 | 965 3% | 989 5% | 1232 31% | 888 -5% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.27 | 2.24 1% | 4.12 -81% | 1.3 43% | 4.95 -118% | 2.18 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.72 | 4.29 9% | 7.78 -65% | 2.76 42% | 8.65 -83% | 3.58 24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.61 | 2.62 -330% | 1.22 -100% | 0.92 -51% | 1.53 -151% | 0.52 15% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.67 | 3 18% | 4.81 -31% | 1.7 54% | 2 46% | 2.8 24% |
Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.086 105% | 2.31 95% | 2.167 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.18 101% |
CCT | 7899 82% | 6289 103% | 7633 85% | 6767 96% | 6265 104% | 6002 108% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-16% | 2% /
-15% | 9% /
10% | 19% /
-5% | 13% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
虽然显示器没有经过最佳校准,但我们使用 X-Rite Fab 测量设备和 Calman 软件进行了校准,将灰度和色彩的 DeltaE 值(对(色彩)偏差很重要)降至远低于 1。加上其良好的色彩空间覆盖率(见下面最后一排图片),该显示器也适用于半专业的图像和视频编辑。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
11.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
18.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.4 ms rise | |
↘ 9.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
得益于超过 300 尼特的亮度和亚光表面,该笔记本电脑的屏幕内容在阴暗环境下依然清晰可见。
性能 - 上一代产品依然出色
上一代 CPU 和 GPU 为系统提供动力。较旧的 酷睿 i5-12500H可使用 16 GB 现代 DDR5 4800 内存和技嘉 1 TB NVMe SSD。再加上 RTX 3080 Ti,Aorus 15 YE5 绝对可以被归类为高端游戏玩家--尽管它采用的是上一代的中端 CPU。
测试条件
Ex works,笔记本电脑没有预装控制中心 - 如果需要,应该可以从技嘉支持网站下载。如果需要,也可以从技嘉支持网站下载。
技嘉控制中心包含许多重要设置,可控制性能、键盘背光和固态硬盘。菜单的结构可以做得更好一些,因为主屏幕似乎没有显示任何有用的信息--你应该首先选择笔记本电脑本身或固态硬盘来获取更多信息。不过,你也可以在相关菜单中进行同样的操作,这就是为什么主屏幕显得特别无意义的原因。我们还错过了切换 GPU 的选项。
除此之外,还有性能模式、风扇曲线、可单独调节的性能模式和其他各种选项。我们使用游戏模式进行了基准测试。在使用更强大的涡轮增压模式时,风扇始终全速运转。
说说它的待机模式:Aorus(包括 Aorus 15G的笔记本电脑(包括 Aorus 15G),只要稍微合上笔记本盖子,笔记本电脑就会切换到待机模式,这似乎是一个普遍现象。例如,如果您正在使用外接显示器,并想将笔记本盖稍微向前折叠一下,这就非常恼人。然而,系统在 40 至 45 度左右就会关闭,这实在是太早了,会让人神经紧张。笔记本电脑应该在实际关闭时才关闭,而不是关闭到一半就关闭。
处理器
这款笔记本电脑配备了 Alder Lake CPU - Core i5-12500H。 酷睿 i5-12500H- 配备 4 个 P 核心和 8 个 E 核心。加起来共有 8 个内核和 16 个线程。这款老式的中高档 CPU 为制造商节省了成本。
在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中,它的性能在前两次运行中略有下降,随后保持稳定。
在所有 CPU 测试中,13 代 CPU 的速度明显优于 12 代 CPU。
在 Captiva配备了 i5-13500H领先约 13%。其他采用更好的 i7-13700H 处理器的竞争者的性能比 Captiva 低 8%(惠普 Victus)。惠普 Victus)到明显高出 22%(Aorus 15 BSFAorus 15 BSF).
Cinebench R15 | 多线程得分(第一次运行) | CPU 功耗(瓦特 |
---|---|---|
AI Boost | 2,277 | 85 |
Turbo | 2,283 | 85 |
游戏 | 2,283 | 85,降至 55 |
创作者 | 2,239 | 85 |
会议 | 836 | 30,迅速降至 15 |
省电模式 | 724 | 30,降至 15 |
电池 | 1,670 | 45 |
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 -1! | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (11330 - 14686, n=9) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1558 - 1701, n=9) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (4687 - 5640, n=9) | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (602 - 656, n=9) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1970 - 2283, n=10) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (220 - 250, n=9) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (223 - 288, n=9) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (44105 - 54380, n=9) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (5151 - 5563, n=9) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (7962 - 10828, n=9) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1471 - 1693, n=9) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (12 - 16.6, n=9) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (40.1 - 58.5, n=9) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (0.4748 - 0.535, n=9) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (6851 - 13947, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (29874 - 68178, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (2287 - 3337, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (77935 - 80703, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (6590 - 7431, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (18252 - 34041, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (50298 - 111567, n=9) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (746 - 924, n=9) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (3848 - 7405, n=9) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (13686 - 43813, n=9) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
系统性能
在 PCMark 10 中,采用后续 CPU 的 Captiva 领先约 7%,而在 CrossMark 中,两款设备的表现相同。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU () | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Aorus 15 BSF |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6883 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (23850 - 66598, n=9) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (24879 - 68013, n=9) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (23543 - 58797, n=9) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (83.8 - 114.7, n=9) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于控制中心不提供平衡模式,我们使用会议模式和创作者模式对笔记本电脑进行了测试。前者在打开多个浏览器标签页时出现了一些延迟问题,在播放 4K/60-fps 的 YouTube 视频时,这些问题变得更加严重,导致了 8 次丢帧。
如果你认为使用功能更强大的创作者模式后情况会有所改观,那就大错特错了。我们已经注意到打开浏览器时延迟增加。另一方面,视频运行时只出现了一次丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
安装了 1 TB 存储空间的技嘉 AG470S1TB-SI B10 是一款快速的高端 PCIe Gen 4 NVMe 固态硬盘。在我们的 固态硬盘最佳排行榜中,它目前排在第 3 位,表现出色。
在 Aorus 15 YE5 中,它可能无法充分发挥自己的潜力(比参考型号落后 12%),但它仍然比竞争对手的固态硬盘更快。唯一的例外是当前一代的 Aorus 15。它使用了相同的固态硬盘,但速度快了 28%。即便如此,我们测试样本的性能仍然非常出色,最重要的是,它在连续使用过程中保持稳定,没有出现节流问题。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
前旗舰机型 Geforce RTX 3080 Ti配备 16GB 内存,作为笔记本电脑的显卡负责 3D 计算。不过,在最大可能的 165 瓦功率中,它的功率只有 130 瓦。这款功能强大的安培芯片不如当前的 Ada Lovelace 架构高效,可能会产生更多热量。
在合成 3DMark 基准测试中,我们的 Aorus 超越了搭载了 RTX 4060和 RTX 4070.我们的 RTX 3080 Ti 在几乎所有测试中都遥遥领先,即使只有几个百分点的差距。不过,它们之间的差距很小,但在所有测试中都保持不变。
在电池模式下,RTX 3080 Ti 在Fire Strike 中的性能从 31110 分下降到只有 6921 分,降幅高达 78%!
3DMark 11 Performance | 30440 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 59322 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25321 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11945 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏
在游戏中,我们的 Aorus 与 新一代 Aorus(配备 RTX 4070不相上下,甚至还以微弱优势击败了它。所有其他配备 RTX 4070 的竞争对手也都以微弱优势落败。搭载 配备 RTX 4080 的 Omen 16在所有游戏测试中都比排名第二的 Aorus 快约 18%。在以 CPU 为核心的游戏中,它的性能落后于竞争对手,这是因为它采用了性能平平的 i5-12500H.
在对各种模式进行比较时,可以发现在Witcher 3 中,涡轮、人工智能和游戏模式的 GPU 性能几乎相同。唯一的区别是,在涡轮模式下 GPU 的温度明显降低,但噪音也明显增大。
创造者模式(此次为蓝色曲线)的表现稍差,耗电量没有那么大,而且温度也稍低。在噪音排放部分,我们列出了运行 Witcher 3 时的各种模式及其对 FPS 和噪音排放的影响。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH -1! | |
Aorus 15 BSF -1! | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Aorus 15 BSF | |
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=245, last 2 years) | |
Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 | |
HP Victus 16-r0077ng | |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH | |
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 184.4 | 180.8 | 176 | 118 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 385 | 306 | 222 | 120 | 86 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 167.6 | 154.1 | 146.4 | 138.9 | 140.1 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 206 | 151.7 | 119.2 | 92.2 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 134.1 | 121.3 | 94.9 | 85.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 165 | 137 | 131 | 124 | 116 |
排放与功率 - 比 RTX 3080 Ti 所显示的更好
噪音排放
在涡轮增压模式下,风扇始终接近极限,即 52 至 55 分贝。而在其他模式下,风扇则更多地根据情况工作。下表列出了在播放《TheWitcher 3 》约 10 分钟后不同模式下的噪音排放水平。总体而言,相对于其性能而言,其噪音排放可以说是适中的,而且由于有多种模式,可以对其进行非常灵活的调节。无论是 Captiva和 惠普 Victus在 3D 应用中表现较差,但噪音却差不多,Captiva 甚至更大。
在游戏模式下,笔记本电脑空转时风扇也会工作,尽管声音很小。在会议模式或节能模式下,风扇通常很安静。在模拟平均负载情况下(3DMark06),选择游戏模式时,噪音逐渐增加,最高达到 43 分贝。在节能模式下,同样的测试仅为 27 分贝。
性能模式/Witcher 3 | 最高帧频 | 平均帧频 | 噪音排放(分贝) | 消耗(瓦特 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Turbo | 124 | 118 | 52.68 | 199 |
AI | 122 | 116 | 44.78 | 197 |
游戏 | 125 | 116 | 46.77 | 196 |
创作者 | 115 | 110 | 44.78 | 185 |
会议 | 111 | 105 | 36.53 | 163 |
节能器 | 115 | 106 | 36.53 | 162 |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 26.42 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.5 / 50.21 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Aorus 15 BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW | HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -20% | -3% | -9% | 10% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24 -4% | 23 -0% | 25 -9% | 23.1 -0% | 23 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 25 -9% | 23 -0% | 28 -22% | 23.1 -0% | 29.6 -29% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 31 -35% | 25.67 -12% | 29 -26% | 23.1 -0% | 29.8 -30% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.42 | 37 -40% | 25.67 3% | 30 -14% | 24.2 8% | 30.4 -15% |
Load Average * | 43.5 | 51 -17% | 38.52 11% | 43 1% | 27.1 38% | 33.8 22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.77 | 54.17 -16% | 46 2% | 40.1 14% | 57 -22% | |
Load Maximum * | 50.21 | 57 -14% | 54.17 -8% | 48 4% | 44.6 11% | 58.3 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在高负载情况下会发热,尤其是底部中央的显示屏。不过,在高达 50 °C的温度下,它的温度仍在典型游戏笔记本电脑的范围之内。顶部的温度甚至出奇地低,最高只有 43 °C。在涡轮增压模式下,温度甚至更低。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Aorus 15 BSF Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | 4% | -8% | 1% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 48 -12% | 41 5% | 51 -19% | 45.6 -6% | 45 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50 | 47 6% | 42 16% | 54 -8% | 42 16% | 48.8 2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 39 -18% | 32 3% | 37 -12% | 34.4 -4% | 29.2 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 32 | 35 -9% | 35 -9% | 29 9% | 33.2 -4% | 28.8 10% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器音量适中是一个积极的方面。不过,几乎没有低音,甚至中高音也不是特别均衡。
麦克风和耳机的 3.5 毫米组合插孔可用于连接外部音频设备。
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.15 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
耗电量
好吧,RTX 3080 Ti 并不完全节俭--从技术上讲,现在的 CPU/GPU 应该更加高效。
例如,要想在玩 Witcher 3 时和 Captiva 一样 "省 电",就必须将我们的 Aorus 设置为会议模式或节能模式。然而,游戏中的刷新率也达到了令人吃惊的水平(见噪音排放部分的表格)。
最重要的是,我们在 3DMark06 测试(平均负载)中测得的 150 瓦功耗非常低;相比之下,Captiva 的功耗仅为 85 瓦。
我们测得的最大值和临时值为 204 瓦,Delta 的 240 瓦电源可以轻松应对。
Off / Standby | 0.02 / 1.4 Watt |
Idle | 13.4 / 19.3 / 20 Watt |
Load |
150 / 218 Watt |
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-12500H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Aorus 15 BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H, Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW | HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 10% | 15% | 23% | 23% | -24% | |
Idle 150cd/m2 * | 16 | 12.4 22% | 18 -13% | 12.8 20% | 20.1 -26% | 23.2 -45% |
3DMark06 Return To Proxycon * | 150 | 85 43% | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra * | 196 | 175.8 10% | 164 16% | 141.8 28% | 95.4 51% | 214 -9% |
1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25 * | 204 | 210 -3% | 179 12% | 164.1 20% | 117.2 43% | 240 -18% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Aorus 的运行时间令人失望,这可能是由于其空闲时的耗电量增加所致。技嘉安装了 99 瓦时的电池,但其运行时间仍与 Captiva的水平!配备 i7-13700H 和 RTX 4070 的新一代 Aorus BSF 的 99 瓦时电池续航时间延长了 65%,在 WLAN 测试中几乎是后者的两倍!它持续了 10 多个小时,而我们的 Aorus 持续了不到 5.5 个小时。
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Aorus 15 BSF i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Captiva Advanced Gaming I74-121 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53 Wh | HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 65% | -4% | 34% | 20% | -19% | 8% | |
H.264 | 317 | 541 71% | 296 -7% | 400 ? 26% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 319 | 619 94% | 315 -1% | 426 34% | 481 51% | 307 -4% | 368 ? 15% |
Load | 101 | 132 31% | 96 -5% | 89 -12% | 68 -33% | 84.7 ? -16% | |
Reader / Idle | 654 | 688 | 328 | 546 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 绝对有竞争力!
12 代 CPU 和 RTX 3080 Ti 的组合绝非过去式,尤其是在(3D)性能方面。Aorus 15 YE5 可以击败配备 RTX 4070 的大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑,因此值得考虑,尤其是考虑到其低廉的价格。尽管如此,Aorus 并没有像许多竞争对手那样放弃雷电 4、快速固态硬盘或全面设计等现代功能。
它的效率不高,这主要体现在笔记本电脑的运行时间令人失望,尽管它的电池容量很大。老式的 720p 网络摄像头可能并不是绝对不能使用,但对于游戏玩家来说,这是一个明显的缺点。Aorus 15 YE5 的一个令人讨厌的典型特点是,只要将显示屏关闭 45 度,设备就会迅速切换到待机状态。
Aorus 15 YE5 以低廉的价格提供了非常强大的游戏性能,而不会像其他一些更昂贵的竞争对手那样显得廉价。它的上一代 GPU 在 3D 性能方面尤其令人印象深刻,而在效率和运行时间方面则有所欠缺。
市场上有一些价格相近的替代产品,如配备 RTX 4070 的微星 Katana。不过,在很多游戏中,Aorus 的速度应该会更快一些。此外,Katana 没有 Thunderbolt 4 功能,也没有高品质的感觉。反过来,微星的优势在于运行时间更长。惠普 惠普 Victus 16惠普 Victus 16 也有类似的表现--它的价格甚至更高一些,但速度和品质感都不如 Aorus。目前,您需要多花大约 300 美元才能购买到新一代 Aorus。
价格和供应情况
Aorus 15 YE5 目前的售价约为 1,500 美元。在撰写本文时,我们在美国的任何在线零售商处都找不到这款产品的销售信息。
Aorus 15 YE5-54DEB34SH
-
12/15/2023 v7
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.