结论——一款中端游戏手机配备的出色OLED显示屏
与去年的 Legion 5 15IRX10 相比，Legion 5 15IAX11 配备了屏幕略大且分辨率更高的显示屏（15.3 英寸 vs. 15.1 英寸），CPU 性能最高提升 30%，并且接口配置也进行了调整。 最值得注意的是，屏幕变大并未导致机身尺寸增大或重量增加。仅凭这些变化，Legion 5 15IAX11就值得优先考虑，而非旧款Legion 5 15IRX10——尽管两者的机身设计和材质在其他方面几乎完全相同。
该系统一个显而易见的缺点是其屏幕过于光亮，反光程度比大多数其他游戏本都要严重。虽然这有助于呈现更清晰的画面，但几乎无法避免的反光可能会让部分玩家感到不适。此外，扬声器的音量本可以更大一些，尤其是当在“性能”模式下游戏时，风扇噪音相当明显。 尽管如此，我们仍要赞赏其搭载了OLED G-Sync和Advanced Optimus技术，这两项配置在入门级至中端游戏本中相对罕见。
Pros
+ 配备DisplayHDR1000和G-Sync技术的清晰OLED显示屏
+ 可升级配置：2个SODIMM插槽 + 2个M.2 SSD插槽
+ 超长续航时间（集成显卡模式下）
+ 舒适的箭头键
+ 纤薄设计
Cons
- 屏幕非常光亮或反光
- 内置扬声器音量相对较小
- 仅支持单区域RGB灯光效果
- 容易沾染指纹
- SSD可能会限速
$1,589.95
Lenovo Legion 5 Gen 10 Gaming Laptop: Ryzen 7 260, NVidia RTX 5060, 16GB DDR5 RAM, 512GB SSD, 15.3" WUXGA (1920x1200) 165Hz Display
联想Legion 5 15IAX11是一款中端游戏笔记本电脑，其15.3英寸的屏幕尺寸在同类产品中较为少见。 它搭载了较新的Arrow Lake Core Ultra 7 251HX处理器，而非去年机型所采用的Raptor Lake Core i7-13650HX，但在其他方面，其机身设计与近期推出的基于AMD平台的Legion 5 15AGP11相同。
我们测试的这台机器属于高配版本，搭载了前述的 Arrow Lake 处理器、105 W 至 115 W 功率的 GeForce RTX 5070 显卡，以及一块 1800p 分辨率、165 Hz 刷新率的 OLED 显示屏。其他型号可能配备 RTX 5060 显卡和 AMD 处理器。 值得注意的是，我们这台测试机型配置了16 GB单通道内存，如需升级为双通道，可通过添加第二条内存条实现。
其竞争对手包括其他轻薄型中端游戏本，例如Razer Blade 16、Gigabyte G5或HP Omen Transcend系列。
更多联想评测：
规格
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (Legion 5 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX 18c/18t, 6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-Core, 12 x 4.5 GHz Intel Skymont E-Core, 107 W PL2 / Short Burst, 95 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Core: 1425 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 105 W TDP, GDDR7, 32.0.16.1088, Advanced Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR5-5600, 46-45-45-90, Single-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 197 PPI, EF25QBA63.E, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 165 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Mainboard
Intel HM870 (Arrow Lake-HX PCH)
Weight
1.946 kg, Power Supply: 664 g
Price
2300 USD
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
连接性
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (1359-1533) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1834 (1760-1911) MBit/s
网络摄像头
3.8 ∆E
1.7 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
维护
输入设备
显示
在HDR模式下，最大亮度可达1076尼特。否则，SDR内容的亮度上限为484尼特，这仍接近500尼特的宣传亮度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EF25QBA63.E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 507.1 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 495.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.67 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 484.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
calibrated: 0.59
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
94.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6762 K
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 EF25QBA63.E, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3", 165 Hz | Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 MNF601BX1-1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Sharp SHP153F (LQ156M1JW30), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 360 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 EF25QBA63.C, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -17% | -48% | -20% | -18% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 71.8 -28% | 43.6 -56% | 67.9 -32% | 70.5 -29% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 99.7 0% | 65.1 -35% | 98.9 -1% | 98.5 -1% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.1 | 72.9 -23% | 45.1 -52% | 68.8 -27% | 72.7 -23% | 94.4 0% |
| Response Times | -3618% | -4783% | -2163% | -5528% | -69% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.41 ? | 20.2 ? -4827% | 28.5 ? -6851% | 13 ? -3071% | 31.7 ? -7632% | 0.9 ? -120% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.65 ? | 16.3 ? -2408% | 18.3 ? -2715% | 8.8 ? -1254% | 22.9 ? -3423% | 1.4 ? -115% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1298.2 ? | 656 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 25 | 18 28% | ||||
| Screen | -25% | -127% | -21% | -42% | -111% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 484.5 | 322 -34% | 277 -43% | 342 -29% | 315 -35% | 500 3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 495 | 306 -38% | 259 -48% | 308 -38% | 303 -39% | 500 1% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 95 | 91 -4% | 77 -19% | 87 -8% | 90 -5% | 98 3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 0.25 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 2.42 29% | 4.3 -26% | 2.46 28% | 2.26 34% | 4.4 -29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.01 | 3.89 35% | 19.14 -218% | 4.12 31% | 7.37 -23% | 7.5 -25% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.59 | 0.82 -39% | 3.01 -410% | 0.82 -39% | 1.03 -75% | 4.6 -680% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 3.6 -125% | 3.6 -125% | 3.03 -89% | 4 -150% | 2.4 -50% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.322 95% | 2.51 88% | 2.116 104% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6762 96% | 6313 103% | 7182 91% | 7056 92% | 7570 86% | 6900 94% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1894 | 1458 | 1179 | 1260 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1220% /
-622% | -1653% /
-883% | -735% /
-377% | -1863% /
-950% | -60% /
-76% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.34 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.31 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1298.2 Hz Amplitude: 25 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1298.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1298.2 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7680 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 LegionSpace 设置为独立显卡模式和性能模式。
处理器性能
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX: Ø3928 (3877.47-3971.8) Points
Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2345 (2305.48-2522.23) Points
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 Intel Core i7-13650HX: Ø2889 (2835.47-3073.14) Points
MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS: Ø2571 (2495.48-2619.69) Points
Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2161 (2113.38-2395.78) Points
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H: Ø2688 (2638-2777.2) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX -1! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 -1! | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 -2! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 10777 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
7068 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5679 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
512.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
741.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3511 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1950 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
71.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
208 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6059 (2747.27-7103.05) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6676 (6057.04-6692.64) MB/s
GPU性能
《黑神话：悟空》在1440p分辨率下，当所有设置（包括帧生成、DLSS和光线追踪）均设为最高时，会持续崩溃。
| 功耗配置文件 | 图形性能得分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合评分 |
| 性能模式 | 36466 | 42392 | 15774 |
| 平衡模式 | 35106（-4%） | 39011（-8%） | 14542 (-8%) |
| 电池电量 | 28001 (-23%) | 29683 (-30%) | 12934 (-18%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 36620 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 74643 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 32846 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13840 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3127 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Cyberpunk 2077 | F1 24 | Black Myth: Wukong
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (63.8 - 94.7, n=20) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (40.3 - 60, n=20) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (62.9 - 94, n=17) | |
| Black Myth: Wukong | |
| 1920x1080 cinematic TSR 100 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (28 - 44, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| 2560x1440 cinematic TSR 100 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (20 - 27, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
| 2560x1440 cinematic DLSS 68 | |
| MSI Crosshair 16 HX AI D2XWGKG | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop (31 - 41, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 | |
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø109.4 (102.3-111.3) fps
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø93.1 (87.5-95) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 187.3 | 185.5 | 181.6 | 143.1 | 122.5 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 199.4 | 179.6 | 181.1 | 160.3 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 231 | 191.1 | 146.1 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 129.5 | 117 | 97.7 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 604 | 366 | 300 | 259 | 177.7 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 128.6 | 126.9 | 88.4 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 153.4 | 133.4 | 113.6 | 102.8 | 76.2 | 65.5 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 284 | 302 | 266 | 92.9 | 94 | 60 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 59 | 35 | 38 | 25 |
排放
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 22.8 / 22.8 / 26.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.7 / 51.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -1% | -4% | -7% | -5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 22.7 | 23.6 -4% | 24 -6% | 25 -10% | 23 -1% | 25 -10% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 22.8 | 23.6 -4% | 24 -5% | 25 -10% | 23 -1% | 25 -10% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 22.8 | 23.6 -4% | 24 -5% | 26 -14% | 23 -1% | 27 -18% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26.6 | 25.4 5% | 28.3 -6% | 27 -2% | 27.87 -5% | 33 -24% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 42.7 | 28.5 33% | 39.6 7% | 40 6% | 54.82 -28% | 40 6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 52 | 50 4% | 50.1 4% | 52 -0% | 54.82 -5% | 45 13% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 51.9 | 50 4% | 50.1 3% | 50 4% | 54.82 -6% | 46 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | -1% | -3% | -14% | -4% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 42.2 | 41.8 1% | 41.6 1% | 48 -14% | 50 -18% | 53 -26% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 49 | 45.2 8% | 52.7 -8% | 46 6% | 66 -35% | 46 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 31.8 | 29.8 6% | 32.6 -3% | 34 -7% | 32 -1% | 32 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 35.8 | 32.4 9% | 33.9 5% | 34 5% | 37 -3% | 34 5% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在“平衡”模式或“性能”模式下进行游戏时，TGP的平均值分别为88 W和105 W。
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) 系统空闲状态 | |
| -- | ||||
| -- | ||||
| 56 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| Prime95 压力测试 | ||||
| 3.6 | ||||
| -- | ||||
| 85 | ||||
| 50 | ||||
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | ||||
| 2.6 | ||||
| 1852 | ||||
| 85 | ||||
| 77 | ||||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试（平衡模式） | ||||
| 1.8 | ||||
| 2400 | ||||
| 76 | ||||
| 77 | ||||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 （性能模式） | ||||
| 1.7 | ||||
| 2602 | ||||
| 76 | ||||
| 78 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
能源管理
功耗
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.49 / 1.1 Watt |
| Idle | 6.9 / 8.3 / 31 Watt |
| Load |
90.2 / 247 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 15.3" | Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1" | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -10% | -13% | -1% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.9 | 14.6 -112% | 11.4 -65% | 13 -88% | 5.2 25% | 7 -1% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.3 | 17.4 -110% | 12.8 -54% | 18 -117% | 19.6 -136% | 12 -45% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 31 | 20 35% | 13.4 57% | 23 26% | 23 26% | 18 42% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 90.2 | 115.6 -28% | 103.7 -15% | 63 30% | 84 7% | 70 22% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 179.7 | 114.3 36% | 171.5 5% | 156 13% | 144 20% | 146.2 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 179.1 | 117.9 34% | 171.5 4% | 156.8 12% | 144 20% | 146.8 18% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 247 | 141.9 43% | 246.8 -0% | 159 36% | 165 33% | 206 17% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø199.4 (190.4-247) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø177.7 (168-247) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.8 (4.97-12.2) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.6 (7.01-16.1) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø179.1 (170.2-192.6) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø171.5 (167.4-176) Watt
外接显示器的功耗
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø140.9 (135.3-150.5) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø143.8 (123.2-219) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø169.4 (165.7-172.6) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø141.5 (138.5-143.5) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø169.7 (147.5-209) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø139.6 (136-152.5) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø162.6 (150.2-173.8) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.47 (4.37-9.63) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.5 (6.44-14.7) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø179.7 (168.7-195.4) Watt
Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø171.5 (167.4-175.2) Watt
电池续航时间
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Ultra 7 251HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG R9 8945HS, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 i7-13620H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -31% | -45% | -55% | -18% | 31% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 8.9 | 6.1 -31% | 4.9 -45% | 4 -55% | 7.3 -18% | 11.7 31% |
| H.264 (h) | 6.1 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.1 |
Notebookcheck 评分
一款性能扎实的中端游戏本，配备的OLED显示屏既令人印象深刻，又光彩夺目。
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11
- 08/28/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手的比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.7%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAX11 Intel Core Ultra 7 251HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 2300 USD | 1.9 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI OLED |
2. 78.9%  | Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 Intel Core i7-13650HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 USD | 2.3 kg | 24.8 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 86.5%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15IRX10 5070 Intel Core i7-13650HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1499€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
4. 76.4%  | MSI Katana A15 AI B8VG AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
5. 76.3%  | Gigabyte G5 KF5 2024 Intel Core i7-13620H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 899 Euro | 2 kg | 22.7 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
6. 80.3%  | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $74.25 Screen Replacement for ASUS ... 2. $15.88 HSSDTECH Laptop LCD Screen H... 3. $879.00 ASUS TUF Gaming A15 Gaming L... List Price: 1199 Euro | 2.1 kg | 22.4 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
