结论——FPS方面表现均衡
首先，我们必须赞扬惠普设计了一款外观真正赏心悦目的主题游戏笔记本电脑。通常情况下，限量版外壳往往装饰过度或过于花哨，因此可能很快就会显得过时。 HyperX Omen 16《Valorant》特别版采用极简设计，更多地依靠简洁的图标和素雅的配色来体现游戏特色，而非复杂的角色形象或鲜艳的图形。只要用户能忍受不可避免的指纹污渍，其外观设计可以说比基础版Omen 16更胜一筹。
《Valorant》本身也与该机器的配置相得益彰。由于在追求高帧率时，这款游戏对 CPU 的要求相当高，因此 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 堪称最适合此任务的 AMD 移动处理器之一。 相比采用更廉价的显示屏，在 G-Sync 和单键 RGB 背光方面做出妥协或许更容易被接受。
除了表面上的改进之外，2026款HyperX Omen 16相较于2025款Omen 16仍仅属小幅更新，因为其底层架构和主板基本保持不变。 相反，更快的 Zen 5 处理器、升级的 IPS 显示屏以及改良的键盘，才是让 2026 款机型与上一代产品区分开来的关键。 请注意，这些改动中的许多都导致功耗高于以往，从而使整体电池续航时间缩短。此外，建议佩戴耳机，因为如果不在“平衡”模式下进行游戏，风扇噪音可能会成为问题。
Pros
+ 易于维护；支持 2 个 SODIMM 插槽 + 2 个 M.2 SSD 插槽
+ 高品质 240 Hz QHD IPS 显示屏，支持全 sRGB 色域
+ 配备集成数字小键盘的舒适按键
+ 极快的原始 CPU 性能
+ 视觉效果出色的《Valorant》皮肤
Cons
- 电池续航时间短；功耗高
- “Unleashed”模式下风扇噪音很大
- 扬声器音量可以更大一些
- 仅支持三区背光
- 容易沾染指纹
- 不支持G-Sync
$1,590.89
HP OMEN MAX 16-ak0047nr 16" WQXGA 240Hz Gaming Laptop, AMD Ryzen AI 7 H 3
2026款HyperX Omen 16是一款中端游戏本，旨在取代去年的2025款Omen 16。 正如在2026年国际消费电子展（CES）上所披露的那样，惠普正逐步将许多Omen机型重新命名为HyperX，因此新款HyperX Omen 16是首批采用新名称的机型之一。
我们测试的机型是HyperX Omen 16的《Valorant》特别版，机身带有主题红色的标识。不过，除了外观上的差异外，其机身结构与2025款Omen 16完全相同。 这款《Valorant》特别版仅提供一种配置，搭载了相对罕见的 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 处理器、115 W 功耗的 GeForce RTX 5070 显卡以及 240 Hz 1600p IPS 显示屏，售价约为 2250 美元。
该细分市场的竞争对手包括其他主流16英寸游戏本，例如微星Crosshair A16、联想Legion Pro 5 16或外星人Alienware 16X Aurora。
更多惠普评测：
规格
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D 16c/32t, 16 x 5.4 GHz AMD Zen 5, 117 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Fire Range-HX (Zen 5)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, RAM: 1525 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR7, 592.19, Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, SK Hynix, DDR5-5600, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0CD1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Weight
2.439 kg, Power Supply: 866 g
Price
2250 USD
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
机身与2025款完全相同，但有两处重要改动。首先，键盘经过重新设计，方向键尺寸更大，布局也更加简洁。其次，内框和外盖上的Omen标志已被HyperX标志取代。除此之外，包括接口在内的整体设计均未发生改变。
连接性
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1744 (1715-1767) MBit/s
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1436 (1250-1633) MBit/s
网络摄像头
这款1080p摄像头配备了内置隐私遮光板，但不支持红外功能。
9.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
24.1 ∆E
1.6 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
维护
与外观上的微小更新类似，2026款Omen 16的内部配置与去年的机型非常相似，同样具备2个M.2 SSD和2个SODIMM的升级功能。
可持续发展
键盘键帽由消费后再生塑料制成，未提及其他部件或再生比例。包装中仅在交流适配器的包装上使用了一小部分塑料。
配件与保修
包装盒内除交流适配器和说明文件外，没有其他配件。若在美国购买，则享有为期一年的制造商有限保修。
输入设备
键盘相较于2025款Omen 16进行了重新设计，增加了更大的方向键，并采用了更简洁的字体布局。不过，触控板的尺寸仍保持为12.5×8厘米。
显示
虽然它可能不是OLED屏幕，但这款IPS显示屏在其他方面都经过了针对快节奏游戏的优化，包括高达240 Hz的刷新率、快速的黑白响应时间以减少拖影、经过校准的sRGB色彩，以及亮度达500尼特的背光。 遗憾的是，它不支持 G-Sync 或 HDR，其中不支持 HDR 主要是因为其黑电平表现平平。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE0CD1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 569.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 545.2 cd/m² Minimum: 29.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 569.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 1212:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.31 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
calibrated: 0.67
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
75% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
73% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
CCT: 6361 K
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr BOE0CD1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK AU Optronics B160QAN02.3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Samsung 160HU05, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 ATNA60HS01-0 (Samsung SDC420A), OLED, 2650x1600, 16", 165 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP MNG007DA5-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -45% | 14% | 21% | 21% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 73 | 40 -45% | 94.9 30% | 99.6 36% | 99.3 36% | 69.4 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.8 | 58.1 -41% | 99.6 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 97.2 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 75 | 38.7 -48% | 83.1 11% | 93.9 25% | 93.9 25% | 71.9 -4% |
| Response Times | -237% | 20% | 96% | 76% | 21% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 5.6 ? | 27.6 ? -393% | 4.2 ? 25% | 0.29 ? 95% | 2 ? 64% | 6.3 ? -13% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 10.7 ? | 19.4 ? -81% | 9.2 ? 14% | 0.45 ? 96% | 1.4 ? 87% | 4.8 ? 55% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1439.8 ? | 1300 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 29 | 16.7 | ||||
| Screen | -77% | -14% | -3% | 42% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 569.7 | 328 -42% | 512.4 -10% | 380.5 -33% | 521 -9% | 480 -16% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 545 | 313 -43% | 476 -13% | 384 -30% | 519 -5% | 456 -16% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 98 9% | 98 9% | 91 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.47 | 0.26 45% | 0.39 17% | 0.075 84% | 0.32 32% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1212 | 1262 4% | 1314 8% | 6947 473% | 1500 24% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.31 | 4.73 -43% | 4.65 -40% | 3.27 1% | 2.5 24% | 1.4 58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.15 | 17.47 -144% | 8.33 -17% | 6.31 12% | 4.85 32% | 2.5 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.67 | 4.22 -530% | 1.3 -94% | 1.1 -64% | 2.5 -273% | 1.3 -94% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 2.05 61% | 3.9 26% | 1 81% | 3.17 40% | 1.2 77% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.63 84% | 2.57 86% | 2.23 99% | 2.35 94% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6361 102% | 6718 97% | 6813 95% | 6410 101% | 6454 101% | 6620 98% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -120% /
-93% | 7% /
-3% | 38% /
19% | 46% /
42% | 11% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 2.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7686 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将系统设置为“Unleashed”模式和独立显卡模式。
处理器性能
该处理器的整体性能仅比搭载 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 的笔记本电脑（如 Alienware 16X Aurora）稍慢一点。除 L3 缓存容量外，Ryzen 9 9955HXD 与 Ryzen 9 9955HX 几乎完全相同。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D: Ø5663 (5471.21-5839.42) Points
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø4084 (4037.14-4295.53) Points
MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø5290 (5233.55-5355.47) Points
Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus: Ø5102 (4340.28-5617.19) Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX: Ø4910 (4795.01-5190.09) Points
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2740 (2520.16-2768.93) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr -1! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK -1! | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 -1! | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (76012 - 84943, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (230738 - 372155, n=4) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (9393 - 9750, n=4) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (171718 - 173351, n=2) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (31654 - 33636, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (122088 - 196829, n=4) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (152883 - 163423, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (2324 - 2517, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (40864 - 45384, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (38765 - 44266, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (19603 - 20751, n=2) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Single Precision GPU 1.7
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 11738 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (56383 - 63173, n=4) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (59750 - 66539, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (59506 - 72898, n=4) | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D (96.1 - 103.6, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Sequential Read:
4836.75MB/s
Sequential Write:
2538.73MB/s
4K Read:
45.25MB/s
4K Write:
116.15MB/s
4K-64 Read:
999.19MB/s
4K-64 Write:
90.22MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.112ms
Access Time Write:
0.262ms
Copy ISO:
3127.57MB/s
Copy Program:
958.69MB/s
Copy Game:
287.74MB/s
Score Read:
1528Points
Score Write:
460Points
Score Total:
2660Points
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6849 (4957.67-6914.73) MB/s
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7228 (5964.95-7269.15) MB/s
GPU性能
这款115 W的GeForce RTX 5070，其运行速度比我们数据库中配备相同GPU选项的普通笔记本电脑快5%至10%。我们建议在游戏时使用“性能”模式或更高模式，因为如下方的Fire Strike测试结果所示，使用“平衡”模式可能会使图形性能下降多达13%。
| 功耗配置文件 | 图形评分 | 物理渲染得分 | 综合得分 |
| 极致模式 | 38864 | 41407 | 19935 |
| 性能模式 | 38484 (-1%) | 39567（-4%） | 18485 (-7%) |
| 平衡模式 | 33847 (-13%) | 33778 (-18%) | 16119 (-19%) |
| 电池供电 | 14105 (-64%) | 24832 (-40%) | 4124 (-79%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 42422 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 77325 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 35794 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 13787 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 3049 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP | |
GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | F1 24
《赛博朋克2077》超高画质帧率图表
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop: Ø110.6 (102.1-113.7) fps
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø78.2 (74.1-78.9) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 188.1 | 187.9 | 188 | 171.5 | 133.2 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 260 | 225 | 214 | 200 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 229 | 182.2 | 135.2 | 100.2 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 157.6 | 144 | 111.9 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 593 | 376 | 301 | 260 | 170.6 | |
| Valorant (2020) | 641.5 | 397.2 | ||||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 134.5 | 136.3 | 93.4 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 177.6 | 148.7 | 123.7 | 108.8 | 79.9 | 68.4 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 383 | 327 | 250 | 88.6 | 86.1 | 56 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 60 | 36 | 38 | 26 |
排放
系统噪音
若在“性能”或“极致”模式下，即使只是浏览网页或观看视频流，风扇噪音也会频繁且显著地飙升。因此，我们建议在不进行游戏时，将模式设置为“平衡”或更低的档位。
在“平衡”、“性能”和“极致”模式下进行游戏时，风扇噪音的平均值分别为 43.4 dB(A)、49.7 dB(A) 和 54.7 dB(A)。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 25.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.7 / 54.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -8% | -4% | 5% | -12% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.8 | 23 3% | 23.4 2% | 23.4 2% | 23 3% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.2 | 23 5% | 29.1 -20% | 23.8 2% | 23 5% | 32.2 -33% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.2 | 23 5% | 29.1 -20% | 23.8 2% | 23 5% | 32.2 -33% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.3 | 27.64 -9% | 29.1 -15% | 31.4 -24% | 23 9% | 32.2 -27% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 45.7 | 49.5 -8% | 41.7 9% | 48.7 -7% | 43.85 4% | 38.1 17% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.7 | 49.5 10% | 58.7 -7% | 51.5 6% | 50.27 8% | 53.9 1% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 54.7 | 52.73 4% | 59 -8% | 59.8 -9% | 52.9 3% | 57.1 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.4 °C / -0.8 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.8 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.2 °C / 84.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.4 °C / -0.8 F).
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 7% | -9% | 3% | -5% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.2 | 36 10% | 41.8 -4% | 48.2 -20% | 42 -4% | 39.5 2% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43 | 37 14% | 50.6 -18% | 41 5% | 44 -2% | 45.1 -5% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30 | 30 -0% | 30.8 -3% | 28.2 6% | 33 -10% | 25.7 14% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 33 | 32 3% | 36 -9% | 26.2 21% | 34 -3% | 25.5 23% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 频率会提升至 4.1 GHz，功耗达到 118 W，随后不久会略微降至 3.8 GHz、105 W 和 76 摄氏度。 在“平衡”、“性能”和“无限制”三种模式下运行《赛博朋克2077》时，TGP的平均值分别为93 W、111 W和111 W，这意味着“平衡”模式下更安静的风扇会在游戏时导致性能略有下降。
| CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) 系统空闲状态 | |
| -- | ||||
| 367 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| 41 | ||||
| Prime95 压力测试 | ||||
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | ||||
| 3.3 | ||||
| 2250 | ||||
| 81 | ||||
| 79 | ||||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试（平衡模式） | ||||
| 0.8 | ||||
| 2340 | ||||
| 71 | ||||
| 68 | ||||
| 《赛博朋克2077》高负载测试（性能模式） | ||||
| 1.2 | ||||
| 2685 | ||||
| 75 | ||||
| 72 | ||||
| 《赛博朋克2077》高负载测试（无限制模式） | ||||
| 1.2 | ||||
| 2455 | ||||
| 89 | ||||
| 74 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
总体功耗非常高，这主要归功于锐龙 9 9955HX3D 处理器。例如，运行 Prime95 时，功耗已达 180 瓦，这比大多数其他游戏本在类似条件下的功耗都要高。因此，下文所述的电池续航时间相对较短也就不足为奇了。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.02 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle | 10.7 / 15.4 / 44.1 Watt |
| Load |
125.9 / 269.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2650x1600, 16" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 28% | -4% | 20% | 16% | 37% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 10.7 | 7.8 27% | 12.3 -15% | 6.9 36% | 10.6 1% | 4.6 57% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 15.4 | 8.8 43% | 17.1 -11% | 8.1 47% | 12.3 20% | 9.8 36% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 44.1 | 21.5 51% | 42.4 4% | 31 30% | 18.6 58% | 10.2 77% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 125.9 | 119 5% | 130.2 -3% | 131.6 -5% | 104 17% | 76.1 40% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 236 | 164.5 30% | 242 -3% | 172.1 27% | 227 4% | 198.1 16% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 239 | 192 20% | 246 -3% | 198.3 17% | 231 3% | 198.9 17% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 269.2 | 208 23% | 264.3 2% | 300.1 -11% | 248 8% | 235.2 13% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø258 (248-269) Watt
Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186.7 (163.6-231) Watt
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø11.4 (9.29-17.2) Watt
Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.4 (14.7-17.6) Watt
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø239 (234-244) Watt
Lenovo Pro 9 16IPH11 Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø161.2 (155-171.2) Watt
外接显示器的功耗
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø179.6 (174.2-198.2) Watt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø94.9 (92.08-120.03) Watt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø103.5 (94.29-121.45) Watt
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø182.5 (172.2-202) Watt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø95.1 (82.09-122.09) Watt
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø156.6 (146.9-164.1) Watt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø161.3 (147.46-176.63) Watt
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø10.7 (8.18-16.7) Watt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø26.4 (17.347-34.44) Watt
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø236 (223-250) Watt
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø164.5 (161.25-168.08) Watt
电池续航时间
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 83 Wh | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 96 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 80 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP R7 260, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 28% | 41% | 90% | 59% | 233% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 3.9 | 5 28% | 5.5 41% | 7.4 90% | 6.2 59% | 13 233% |
| H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 6.1 | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.8 |
Notebookcheck 评分
HyperX Omen 16 的外观变化仅为细微调整，但在 CPU 和显示屏方面进行了重大升级，尤其是其搭载的极致版 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D CPU。
HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr
- 08/21/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.9%  | HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,909.00 HP Omen 16 Gaming AI Laptop ... 2. $1,099.99 HP Omen 16 Slim Gaming Lapto... 3. $1,590.89 HP OMEN MAX 16-ak0047nr 16" ... List Price: 2250 USD | 2.4 kg | 30 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 82.5%  | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
3. 82.5%  | MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,699.00 List Price: 2700 USD | 2.3 kg | 25.55 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 86.1%  | Alienware 16X Aurora Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 3000 USD | 2.6 kg | 23.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
5. 86.4%  | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IAX10, RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1800 Euro | 2.3 kg | 25.95 mm | 16.00" 2650x1600 189 PPI OLED |
6. 83.8%  | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA608UP AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2199€ | 2.2 kg | 25.7 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
