结论——基础游戏体验,毫无花哨之词
定位于亲民价位的联想 LOQ Essential 15 在性能与外观设计方面都做得很到位。 更具体地说,它并没有在 CPU 和 GPU 配置上偷工减料,而是通过舍弃诸如 RGB 背光、G-Sync、Advanced Optimus、触控板尺寸、网络摄像头画质、OLED 屏幕和 Thunderbolt 等次要功能来降低成本——这些功能对于游戏体验而言,其重要性显然不如处理器本身。
尽管这些功能上的取舍合情合理,但依然十分明显。例如,缺少Advanced Optimus和G-Sync功能,分别会影响电池续航和导致画面撕裂。 要求更高的发烧友或内容创作者可能会对相对较低的约55 W TGP目标值嗤之以鼻,同时也可能对缺乏HDR支持或P3色域感到不满——这些在Legion Pro 5 16等高端机型上本应是标配。风扇噪音也相当大,达到50 dB(A),这属于建议佩戴耳机的噪音范围。 不过,对于大多数休闲玩家而言,考虑到价格和功能上的取舍,LOQ Essential 15 或许“恰到好处”。
Pros
Cons
不要将其与价格稍高的联想 LOQ 15 混淆,联想 LOQ Essential 15 是一款价格更低廉的机型,专为预算有限的学生或游戏玩家设计。 该机型最高可配备 GeForce RTX 5060 显卡、1080p 144 Hz IPS 显示屏以及上一代 Core i7-13650HX Raptor Lake 处理器。
我们测试的这台机器属于高端配置,具备上述规格,售价约为 1650 美元。值得注意的是,虽然我们这台测试机配置的是 16 GB 单通道内存,但可以轻松添加第二条内存条以实现双通道性能。
其竞争对手包括其他定位于入门级市场游戏本,例如惠普 Victus 15、微星 Cyborg 15 或宏碁 Nitro V 15。
更多联想评测:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
LOQ Essential 15 与标准版 LOQ 15 之间最显著的差异在于屏幕宽高比(16:9 与 16:10)以及方向键尺寸较小。接口选项方面也存在细微差异,但底座机身材质及整体手感基本相似。
连接性
沟通
Wi-Fi 6E 或更快的标准仅在某些配置中为可选功能。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
网络摄像头

| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 322 cd/m²
Contrast: 1894:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.42 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
calibrated: 0.82
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
72.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
71.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
CCT: 6313 K
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 MNF601BX1-1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 B153UAN02.J (AUO5DBA), IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 165 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S LG LP156WFJ-SPB4 (LGD0742), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng BOE094D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AU Optronics B156HAN15.H, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | -42% | -44% | -1% | -38% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 71.8 | 78.8 10% | 40 -44% | 39.2 -45% | 70.5 -2% | 43.4 -40% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.7 | 99.8 0% | 60 -40% | 57.9 -42% | 98.5 -1% | 64.8 -35% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 72.9 | 79.6 9% | 41.4 -43% | 40.5 -44% | 72.7 0% | 44.9 -38% |
| Response Times | 54% | -64% | -9% | -49% | -30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 20.2 ? | 10.7 ? 47% | 34.2 ? -69% | 23.8 ? -18% | 31.7 ? -57% | 27.6 ? -37% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 16.3 ? | 6.5 ? 60% | 25.8 ? -58% | 16.3 ? -0% | 22.9 ? -40% | 20 ? -23% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||||
| Screen | -15% | -117% | -124% | -23% | -89% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 322 | 291 -10% | 292 -9% | 273 -15% | 315 -2% | 286 -11% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 306 | 277 -9% | 263 -14% | 249 -19% | 303 -1% | 272 -11% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 88 -3% | 80 -12% | 84 -8% | 90 -1% | 87 -4% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.17 | 0.3 -76% | 0.25 -47% | 0.28 -65% | 0.25 -47% | 0.17 -0% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1894 | 970 -49% | 1168 -38% | 975 -49% | 1260 -33% | 1682 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.42 | 2.36 2% | 7.15 -195% | 5.19 -114% | 2.26 7% | 4.61 -90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.89 | 4.12 -6% | 15.51 -299% | 21.16 -444% | 7.37 -89% | 19.59 -404% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.82 | 4.13 -404% | 4.54 -454% | 1.03 -26% | 2.99 -265% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 2.5 31% | 4.9 -36% | 1.7 53% | 4 -11% | 3.9 -8% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.128 103% | 2.014 109% | 2.148 102% | 2.116 104% | 2.236 98% |
| CCT | 6313 103% | 7012 93% | 7178 91% | 6819 95% | 7570 86% | 6792 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 15% /
0% | -74% /
-93% | -59% /
-90% | -24% /
-22% | -52% /
-70% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 8.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 20.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 10.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7680 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 和 LegionSpace 设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -4! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (16906 - 21006, n=7) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1693 - 1903, n=7) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (6423 - 8021, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (686 - 728, n=6) | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (2522 - 3147, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (256 - 275, n=6) | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (158 - 226, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (5824 - 6125, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (11401 - 14378, n=4) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (2505 - 2595, n=4) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (11325 - 14778, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1810 - 1866, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (17.4 - 23.6, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (38.9 - 58.8, n=6) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (0.4217 - 0.4508, n=7) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -2! | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 -1! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -1! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (13404 - 20012, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (68241 - 97317, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (3127 - 4487, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (108627 - 110589, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (9134 - 10887, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (33391 - 48323, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (64436 - 85343, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (961 - 1285, n=6) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (7270 - 10900, n=6) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (21057 - 43289, n=6) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (n=1) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Quantized GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -3! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -3! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -5! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S -7! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -8! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9009 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (34903 - 66372, n=6) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (37952 - 71022, n=6) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (33485 - 68225, n=6) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (83.7 - 91.9, n=6) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU性能
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 -1! | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
| Razer Blade 15 2022 -1! | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV -1! | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Katana GF66 11UG-220 -2! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -1! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S -1! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -1! | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 28806 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 56494 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23432 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10263 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2176 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 -3! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -2! | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S -2! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (77.2 - 104.4, n=19) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (68.1 - 94.9, n=21) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (30.8 - 39.8, n=3) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AGP11 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (78.1 - 118.6, n=20) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| F1 24 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (44.9 - 77.5, n=9) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| Black Myth: Wukong | |
| 1920x1080 high TSR 100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (47 - 58, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
| 1920x1080 cinematic TSR 100 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop (26 - 32, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 | |
《赛博朋克2077》极致画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 183.5 | 178.1 | 168.5 | 106.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 170.2 | 155.9 | 147.5 | 136 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 173.3 | 121.8 | 93.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 109.6 | 101.3 | 87.2 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 384 | 224 | 188.9 | 163.9 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 92.7 | 90.9 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 105.1 | 88.8 | 77.2 | 69.6 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 189.2 | 180.6 | 152.6 | 44.9 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 82 | 62 | 47 | 26 |
排放
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 25.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 28.5 / 50 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -21% | -21% | -19% | -11% | -14% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.6 | 25 -6% | 25 -6% | 25 -6% | 25 -6% | 24 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.6 | 29 -23% | 25 -6% | 29 -23% | 25 -6% | 25 -6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.6 | 30 -27% | 29 -23% | 30 -27% | 27 -14% | 28 -19% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.4 | 37 -46% | 30 -18% | 31 -22% | 33 -30% | 33 -30% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 28.5 | 43 -51% | 49 -72% | 40 -40% | 40 -40% | 44 -54% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 50 | 48 4% | 45 10% | 45 10% | ||
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50 | 50 -0% | 51 -2% | 48 4% | 46 8% | 50 -0% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 49 | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.2 °C / 77.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.6 °C / 6.4 F).
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -28% | 2% | 13% | -10% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41.8 | 53 -27% | 46 -10% | 42 -0% | 53 -27% | 46 -10% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.2 | 58 -28% | 48 -6% | 42 7% | 46 -2% | 45 -0% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 29.8 | 27 9% | 24 19% | 32 -7% | 36 -21% | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32.4 | 28 14% | 24 26% | 34 -5% | 38 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) 系统空闲 | |
| -- | ||||
| -- | ||||
| 53 | ||||
| 42 | ||||
| Prime95 压力测试 | ||||
| 2.6 | ||||
| -- | ||||
| 77 | ||||
| 54 | ||||
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | ||||
| 2.8 | ||||
| 1335 | ||||
| 89 | ||||
| 61 | ||||
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | ||||
| 1.4 | ||||
| 1957 | ||||
| 72 | ||||
| 67 |
Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
能源管理
功耗
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKCD512TFK, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3" | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 24% | 38% | 24% | 5% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 14.6 | 3 79% | 7 52% | 5 66% | 7 52% | 14.9 -2% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 17.4 | 6.8 61% | 8 54% | 9 48% | 12 31% | 16.3 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 20 | 11.5 43% | 11 45% | 22 -10% | 18 10% | 22.2 -11% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 115.6 | 67 42% | 76 34% | 72 38% | 70 39% | 72 38% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 114.3 | 146.2 -28% | 89.6 22% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 117.9 | 167 -42% | 146.8 -25% | 90.3 23% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 141.9 | 197 -39% | 136 4% | 176 -24% | 206 -45% | 117 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 98.2 | 113 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 i7-13650HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV R9 8945H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 55.2 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 15% | 54% | 23% | 92% | -11% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 6.1 | 7 15% | 9.4 54% | 7.5 23% | 11.7 92% | 5.4 -11% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 21.5 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.7 |
Notebookcheck 评分
一款简约实惠的游戏本,舍弃了大部分附加功能,以换取不错的外观以及中端级别的GPU和CPU配置。
Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11
- 08/25/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenovo LOQ Essential 15IRX11 Intel Core i7-13650HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 USD | 2.3 kg | 24.8 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP11 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1500 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $50.53 HPDELGB Replacement for Acer... 2. $73.48 FIXARAMA Screen Replacement ... 3. $22.99 Deal4GO CPU & GPU Graphics C... List Price: 900 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $849.00 HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1... 2. $689.99 HP Victus Gaming 15 Laptop: ... 3. $799.99 HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop, ... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA507UV AMD Ryzen 9 8945H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $74.25 Screen Replacement for ASUS ... 2. $15.88 HSSDTECH Laptop LCD Screen H... 3. $879.00 ASUS TUF Gaming A15 Gaming L... List Price: 1199 Euro | 2.1 kg | 22.4 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1099 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.2 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.













































































