结论：一款全方位表现出色的高端笔记本电脑
凭借 HP EliteBook X，惠普宣称要问鼎企业级笔记本电脑市场。这款产品在很大程度上兑现了这一承诺。 HP EliteBook X G2i 在轻薄机身中提供了极强的 CPU 性能，配备了我们近期测试过最出色的键盘之一、触感极佳的触控板，以及 5G 等更具前瞻性的商务功能。这款镁合金外壳的笔记本还拥有出色的电池续航和强劲的扬声器，为用户带来全方位的高端体验。 虽然在高负载下风扇运转声较大，但在日常使用中却完全静音。总体而言，对于需要处理高CPU负载任务的用户以及经常出差的人士来说，这款设备是一个绝佳的选择。
另一项较为独特的商务功能，恰恰是我们评测机的最大弱点：惠普的 SureView 屏幕虽然亮度很高，但狭窄的可视角度严重影响了使用体验。当然，对于商务用户而言，隐私屏的价值很高，而且惠普还提供许多其他更注重画质且更适合消费者的屏幕选项。 因此，在购买 EliteBook X 时，请务必选择上述其他屏幕选项之一，除非您确实需要 ePrivacy 功能。
Pros
Cons
如果您是寻求顶级商务笔记本电脑的大型企业客户，惠普（HP）推荐您选购 HP EliteBook X。这是惠普 EliteBook 商务系列的旗舰机型，一款轻薄高端笔记本电脑，旨在与联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 和戴尔 Pro Premium 竞争。 在第二代产品中，惠普推出了全新的统一设计，该设计适用于所有不同的 CPU 选项——提供 AMD、高通和英特尔三种选择。在本评测中，我们将测试英特尔版本，因此我们的评测机型名为 HP EliteBook X G2i 14。
规格：Panther Lake H级芯片
案例：惠普转向镁合金
虽然过去几代的 EliteBook 笔记本电脑主要采用铝材作为机身结构材料，但 HP EliteBook X G2i 则采用了镁合金，其外表面涂有偏白偏银的色调。 黑色屏幕边框由塑料制成，这是除键盘外，整机中唯一采用不同颜色的部件。掌托上的特殊 EliteBook X 徽标、大型扬声器网罩以及下拉式铰链进一步突显了其设计特色。
这款惠普笔记本的整体品质非常出色。 这款商务笔记本几乎没有任何弯曲现象，只有屏幕盖的中部可以稍微按下去一点。此外，铰链设计也很出色，不仅支持177度的开合角度，支持单手开合，而且完全不会晃动。
与第一代惠普 EliteBook X 相比，这款新机型体积略小、重量更轻，但机身也更厚。另一方面，联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代在重量方面依然是当之无愧的冠军。
连接性：EliteBook X 现已配备用户可拆卸键盘
尽管惠普对 EliteBook X 进行了诸多改动，但接口配置并未包含在这些改动之中。与旧款机型相比，接口配置保持不变。
沟通
惠普采用了速度极快的 Wi-Fi 7 解决方案——英特尔 B211 320 MHz 芯片，在我们的基准测试中表现非常出色。此外，EliteBook 还可选配 5G 解决方案——我们收到的评测机型出厂时已预装该功能。
网络摄像头
惠普 EliteBook X G2i 配备的 500 万像素网络摄像头表现出色，图像清晰，色彩失真程度较低。
安全
作为一款企业级机型，EliteBook 配备了几乎全套的安全解决方案——包括锁槽、指纹识别器、红外摄像头和机械式网络摄像头遮盖板，此外还有 SureView ePrivacy 隐私屏。智能卡读卡器未包含在该配置中，该功能仅保留给更高配置的 EliteBook 笔记本电脑。
配件
惠普随附了一个壁挂式 65 W GaN USB-C 充电器，体积小巧且重量轻。不包含其他配件。
维护
底盖仅由四颗螺丝固定，因此拆解内部组件十分便捷。当然，还有一些卡扣需要用撬棒撬松。
由于内存和 Wi-Fi 卡是焊接在主板上的，因此升级空间有限。 M.2 2280 SSD 是模块化的，WWAN 卡也是如此。当然，电池可以轻松更换，散热系统也可以进行清洁。今年的新变化是：键盘变得更容易由用户自行更换，这一举措我们绝对赞赏。
可持续发展
HP EliteBook X G2i 的包装完全可回收，产品本身也含有再生材料。在二氧化碳排放方面，惠普宣称面向欧洲市场的 EliteBook X G2i 的排放量为 283 公斤/CO2e。 此外，作为一款商务设备，您将长期获得配件支持和软件更新，同时还可在线获取维护手册。
保修
我们对这款惠普笔记本电脑的德语评测样机享有三年保修，其中包括上门服务。
输入设备：笔记本电脑中最好的键盘之一
键盘
2026款EliteBook X笔记本电脑的新功能之一是重新设计的键盘，其无网格设计比常见的巧克力键盘设计更接近经典PC键盘。它外观现代，但比戴尔XPS的无网格键盘设计更易于使用。 此外，键盘背光功能表现出色，键帽设计有效防止了光线从键底溢出。
总体而言，这款极为舒适的键盘给我们留下了深刻印象。 这些光滑的深灰色按键间距宽敞，回弹感良好且按键行程较长，布局也十分合理。这是我们近期测试过的最佳笔记本键盘之一。唯一可能需要改进的地方是方向键的布局略显局促。
触控板
惠普搭载了一块巨大的玻璃触控板，面积为 13.8 x 9 厘米。为了实现全区域点击，惠普采用了触觉反馈技术，这款触控板的表现非常出色。正如预期，点击手感彰显品质，玻璃表面同样如此。 综合来看，EliteBook X G2i 的触控板完全有实力角逐“最佳 Windows 触控板”的称号。
显示屏：Bright SureView 屏幕，可视角度有限
HP EliteBook X G2i 共有七款 14 英寸 16:10 屏幕可选，均采用哑光屏面：
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200)，IPS，400 cd/m²，100% sRGB，低功耗
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200)，IPS，500 cd/m²，100% sRGB，触控
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200)，OLED，300 cd/m²，95% DCI-P3
- WUXGA（1,920 x 1,200），IPS，800 cd/m²，100% sRGB，SureView
- WUXGA (1,920 x 1,200)，IPS，800 cd/m²，100 % sRGB，SureView，触控
- 2.8K (2,880 x 1,800)，OLED，500 cd/m²，100% DCI-P3，120 Hz VRR
- 2.8K（2,880 x 1,800），Tandem OLED，700 cd/m²，100% DCI-P3，120 Hz 可变刷新率，触控
我们评测机型的 SureView 隐私屏既是福音，也是祸根。它提供了高屏幕亮度，但即使关闭隐私模式，可视角度依然非常有限，且当头部稍稍偏离最佳位置时，亮度就会大幅下降。 此外，亮度分布不均：屏幕底部亮度仅略高于 500 cd/m²，而屏幕中央却高达 800 cd/m² 以上。从参数上看，这块屏幕非常亮，但在实际使用中，除非你完全坐在屏幕正中央，否则画面会显得暗得多。 当然，作为回报，当您不希望除自己以外的任何人看到屏幕内容时，SureView隐私屏确实能保护您的数据安全。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 53 %
Center on Battery: 856 cd/m²
Contrast: 2675:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 6.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
66.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
91.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
64.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6156 K
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET IVO8CCB, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE B140UAX01.1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 LG Philips LP140WU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE MNE007QB1-1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | 9% | 4% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 64.6 | 69.9 8% | 69.8 8% | 65.9 2% | 71.6 11% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 91.1 | 98.4 8% | 99.1 9% | 96.4 6% | 97.4 7% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 66.3 | 71.6 8% | 72 9% | 68.1 3% | 70.4 6% |
| Response Times | -3% | 18% | -26% | 42% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 44.8 ? | 42.3 ? 6% | 42 ? 6% | 50.5 ? -13% | 27.8 ? 38% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 25.3 ? | 28 ? -11% | 17.7 ? 30% | 35.2 ? -39% | 14 ? 45% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | 19% | -4% | 4% | 22% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 856 | 487.5 -43% | 540 -37% | 571.5 -33% | 574 -33% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 692 | 469 -32% | 524 -24% | 513 -26% | 530 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 53 | 91 72% | 93 75% | 83 57% | 87 64% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.3 6% | 0.29 9% | 0.32 -0% |
| Contrast (:1) | 2675 | 1875 -30% | 1800 -33% | 1971 -26% | 1794 -33% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 2.37 46% | 5 -14% | 4.58 -4% | 2 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.8 | 5.77 41% | 12.2 -24% | 9.44 4% | 3.7 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 0.86 55% | 1.1 42% | 0.72 62% | 1.1 42% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 3.8 42% | 8.3 -28% | 6.8 -5% | 2.6 60% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% | 2.22 99% | 2 110% | 2.27 97% |
| CCT | 6156 106% | 6540 99% | 7068 92% | 6303 103% | 6910 94% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
14% | 8% /
2% | -6% /
-0% | 24% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂时，这块面板的色调略微偏绿。通过校色，可以轻松纠正这一问题，且颜色在较小的 sRGB 色域内将相当准确。我们创建的色彩配置文件可在上方的灰色框中下载。
惠普宣传该面板覆盖100% sRGB色域，而我们的实测值约为91.1%。对于需要处理色彩的工作而言，这可能是一个问题，但至少其色彩准确度要高于许多更便宜的IPS屏幕。
如果您正对着屏幕，在户外使用也没问题。但是，只要稍微偏离中心一点，亮度就会大幅下降，即使关闭了 ePrivacy 功能也是如此。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7665 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能：适用于轻量级商业模式的强力 CPU
惠普推出的 EliteBook X G2i 笔记本电脑搭载了多种英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器，包括英特尔酷睿 5 Ultra 325、Ultra 5 335、Ultra 7 356H、Ultra 7 366H 以及 Ultra X7 358H。 除搭载 ARC B390 集成显卡的 Ultra X7 之外，所有 CPU 选项均配备 Panther Lake 基础版英特尔集成显卡。
内存选项范围为 16 至 64 GB 的板载 LPDDR5X-9600 内存。惠普销售的 EliteBook 最高支持 2 TB SSD 存储，采用 M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 5.0 SSD 形式。
测试条件
- 最佳能效：PL1 20 W / PL2 45 W
- 均衡型：PL1 20 W / PL2 60 W
- 最佳性能：PL1 40 W / PL2 60 W
所有基准测试均在“最佳性能”模式下进行。
处理器性能
英特尔酷睿Ultra 7 356H是一款“Panther Lake”处理器，拥有四个大型“Cougar Cove” P核心、八个“Darkmont” E核心以及四个基于Darkmont架构的低功耗E核心，共计十六个核心。 该 CPU 的最高时钟频率可达 4.7 GHz，典型 TDP 值为 25 W，但实际值可能低至 15 W 或高至 80 W。您可通过我们的 CPU 基准测试列表进行更多与其他 CPU 的对比。
凭借这款强劲的处理器，惠普 EliteBook X G2i 不仅轻松超越了搭载 Lunar Lake 处理器的上一代机型，还超越了搭载更基础版 Panther Lake 处理器的联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代。 在高端商务级产品中，得益于其高TDP，这款设备表现极为出色，其性能可与AMD的Ryzen 9 HX 470相媲美。
在设备使用电池供电时，我们未检测到任何降频现象。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (16480 - 20650, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5263 - 21812, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (2001 - 2045, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (975 - 2213, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (6454 - 8074, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2072 - 8541, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (761 - 775, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (366 - 832, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (2777 - 3201, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (849 - 3334, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (281 - 306, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (186 - 322, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 633, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (163 - 237, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (52654 - 69785, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16455 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (5348 - 6375, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4088 - 6699, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (12119 - 16676, n=6) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5987 - 20325, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1922 - 4195, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (2532 - 2851, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (12918 - 16761, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6351 - 17218, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (1993 - 2098, n=4) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1443 - 2224, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (17.6 - 25.1, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3.16 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (39.9 - 78.8, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (46.6 - 60.5, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4024 - 0.861, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (0.4268 - 0.459, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE -1! | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI -1! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (13003 - 20528, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2069 - 32043, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (69269 - 108092, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11041 - 120045, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (3918 - 5284, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (561 - 5169, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (44593 - 95002, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (6438 - 6965, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (692 - 18164, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (37457 - 58505, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5978 - 64271, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (62165 - 68479, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6815 - 96917, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (956 - 1199, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (127.2 - 1361, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (6800 - 11057, n=5) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (953 - 17362, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (25558 - 83163, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10193 - 85600, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (3781 - 4629, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (471 - 5939, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (8393 - 9011, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 9939, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10370 - 11208, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8368 - 11646, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (14787 - 17512, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 16606, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (9971 - 10434, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5181 - 13779, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1861 - 1981, n=4) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1061 - 2356, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1700 - 1892, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1022 - 2277, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2004 - 2397, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1070 - 2743, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1520 - 1875, n=4) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1010 - 1854, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (203 - 530, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (277 - 303, n=4) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (259 - 297, n=4) | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (167.3 - 378, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 709, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (460 - 476, n=4) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8393 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15233 - 131023, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (42521 - 121055, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13982 - 127174, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (38043 - 113363, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17404 - 135141, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (35919 - 120449, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 356H (88.6 - 130.5, n=5) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.1 - 317, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (316 - 17697, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们用于评测的设备配备了一块容量为 1 TB 的高速 NVMe PCIe 5.0 SSD。这款 M.2 2280 固态硬盘由 Kioxia 制造，在我们的基准测试中表现出色，即使在持续负载下也没有出现性能降频现象。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU 性能
虽然 EliteBook X G2i 在 CPU 性能上轻松超越了前代机型，但在 GPU 方面却恰恰相反。在此方面，基础版的 Panther Lake 集成显卡不敌较旧的英特尔 ARC Graphics 140V。 当然，也有可选配置搭载更强劲的 ARC B390，而且对于商务笔记本而言，强大的 GPU 通常并非关键因素。若您希望在下班后用它玩游戏，它可以在降低细节和分辨率的情况下运行一些基础的、较旧的游戏。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8243 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6554 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3413 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.6 - 78.6, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.37 - 54.5, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE | |
| Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.9 - 97, n=60, last 2 years) | |
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 182.4 | 171 | 54.8 | 22 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 145.2 | 93.3 | 94 | 89.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 76.4 | 39.5 | 27.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 37.6 | 32.8 | 30.7 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 31.5 | 23.1 | 19.9 | 19.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 39.2 | 29.1 | 25.7 | 21.6 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 65.5 | 54.6 | 41.3 |
噪音：满载时风扇噪音较大，其他情况下则较为安静
系统噪声
HP EliteBook X G2i 在噪音表现上颇有几分“杰基尔博士与海德先生”的双重性格：空闲时，它完全静音。 但在满载运行时，其噪音水平高达 47.5 dB(a)，超过了其他任何一款商务笔记本电脑。这显然是用户为获得高性能 CPU 而必须接受的妥协。
我们未检测到任何线圈啸叫声。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 32.9 / 47.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | 1% | 3% | 0% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.5 | 28.2 -15% | 24.8 -1% | 23.2 5% | 24.8 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.5 | 28.4 -16% | 24.8 -1% | 23.2 5% | 24.8 -1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.5 | 28.4 -16% | 24.8 -1% | 23.2 5% | 24.8 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.5 | 28.8 -18% | 24.8 -1% | 23.2 5% | 24.8 -1% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 32.9 | 33.5 -2% | 38.9 -18% | 37.5 -14% | 36.7 -12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 43.4 | 39.1 10% | 38.9 10% | 37.7 13% | 41.6 4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 47.5 | 40.4 15% | 38.9 18% | 47.1 1% | 41.6 12% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
鉴于其高性能，人们可能会认为 EliteBook 会发热。然而，在我们的测试中，它并未达到临界点，因为机身温度几乎未超过 40 摄氏度或 105 华氏度。
在一小时的压力测试中，这款惠普笔记本电脑未出现任何降频现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-3.1 °C / -5.5 F).
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Radeon 860M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 23% | 12% | 8% | 10% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.3 | 35 13% | 40.7 -1% | 40.8 -1% | 42.3 -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.8 | 33.4 18% | 42.8 -5% | 42.6 -4% | 43.8 -7% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 33 | 23.8 28% | 24.9 25% | 26 21% | 25.2 24% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 35 | 24.2 31% | 25 29% | 29.2 17% | 25.5 27% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
作为一款轻量级商务笔记本电脑，惠普 EliteBook X G2i 配备了出色的扬声器。它总共拥有六个扬声器，能够发出响亮且均衡的声音，低音表现也相当不错。
HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
能源管理：Panther Lake 提供出色的能效
功耗
这款惠普商务笔记本的功耗比之前的惠普 EliteBook X G1i 略高。考虑到其搭载了性能更强的 Panther Lake H 平台，这并不令人意外。
惠普随附了一个小巧的 65 W 充电器，其功率刚好足以满足惠普 EliteBook X G2i 的功耗需求。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 3 / 7.2 / 7.7 Watt |
| Load |
32.9 / 65 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Kioxia KBG80ZNV1T02, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Radeon 860M, Micron 2650 MTFDKBA512TGW, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 18% | 1% | -2% | 1% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3 | 2.5 17% | 1.6 47% | 2.8 7% | 2.7 10% | 2.74 ? 9% | 3.57 ? -19% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.2 | 5.4 25% | 4.6 36% | 6 17% | 5.5 24% | 5.39 ? 25% | 6.47 ? 10% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.7 | 5.8 25% | 4.9 36% | 7.4 4% | 6.8 12% | 7.42 ? 4% | 7.78 ? -1% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 32.9 | 36.9 -12% | 39.7 -21% | 47.9 -46% | 60.5 -84% | 39.4 ? -20% | 40.4 ? -23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 55.7 | 48.5 13% | 45.2 19% | 47.9 14% | 49.7 11% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 50.8 | 44.9 12% | 46.1 9% | 45.3 11% | 44.1 13% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 65 | 54.6 16% | 64.2 1% | 67 -3% | 64.8 -0% | 73.5 ? -13% | 64.3 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
当笔记本电脑断开充电器时，HP EliteBook X G2i 由内置的 68 Wh 电池供电。 在 Wi-Fi/网页浏览测试（150 cd/m²）中，该笔记本电脑的续航时间超过 18 小时，这是一个不错的成绩，尽管略逊于联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代。
| HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET Ultra 7 356H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 68 Wh | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Ultra 5 325, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 58 Wh | Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470, Radeon 890M, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, Radeon 860M, 58 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 3% | 29% | -13% | -3% | 6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 18 | 18.5 3% | 23.2 29% | 15.7 -13% | 17.4 -3% | 14.1 ? -22% |
| Load (h) | 1.5 | 1.992 ? 33% |
Notebookcheck 评分
HP EliteBook X G2i 14 是最好的 14 英寸商务笔记本电脑之一，性能强劲，配备同级领先的输入设备，且整体设计精良。配置时请务必避开 SureView 显示屏。
HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET
- 09/07/2026 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 89.5%  | HP EliteBook X G2i 14 DL9Y8ET Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2500 Euro | 1.2 kg | 17.5 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED |
2. 85.1%  | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3300 USD | 1.2 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
3. 89.9%  | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 14 21V70075GE Intel Core Ultra 5 325 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,899.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 2. $2,928.32 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 3. $2,199.99 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Bu... List Price: 2469€ | 1.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
4. 84.7%  | Dell Pro 7 14 P714265 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 470 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 64 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 4900 USD | 1.3 kg | 16.45 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 89.7%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 7 21YW0022GE AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,749.00 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 2... 2. $489.60 Lenovo ThinkPad T14s | 14" F... 3. $1,095.00 Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 14... | 1.2 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
