最终评价 — 高调而自豪
作为一款性能优先的游戏笔记本电脑,HyperX Omen Max 16 的核心目标就是充分释放 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus CPU 和 175 W GeForce RTX 5090 GPU 的性能。事实上,设为 Unleased 模式时,显卡功耗确实能达到接近 175 W 的目标上限,而大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑往往徘徊在 140 W 或更低水平。G-Sync 支持、集成数字小键盘以及坚固的底座,进一步奠定了这款机型作为*顶级*性能猛兽的地位,足以与 MSI Titan 或 Alienware Area-51 等其他巨头抗衡。
其他惊喜还包括较长的电池续航,以及运行低负载任务时安静的风扇噪声。对于如此庞大的系统而言,在不需要额外性能时,它也能表现得相当安静。
最大、最明显的缺点是尺寸和重量。这款笔记本不仅比去年已经很大的 Omen Max 16 略厚、略重,就连其电源适配器也比大多数同类产品更笨重。毕竟,要让高功耗的 CPU 和 GPU 同时以各自的最高功率运行,确实需要一个相当硕大的电源适配器。与此同时,扬声器的表现不如预期,声音不够强劲,无法盖过游戏时超过 55 dB(A) 的风扇噪声。
寻求更均衡游戏笔记本的用户可能会觉得 Razer Blade 或 MSI Stealth 16 比 Omen Max 16 更有吸引力,因为它们明显更加紧凑,同时仍配备 RTX 5090 显卡,只是目标 TGP 较低。
Pros
Cons
Table of Contents
HyperX Omen Max 16 是 HP 的旗舰级 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,拥有顶级配置。它的定位比 HyperX Omen 16 高一个档次,同时也是去年搭载较早的 Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 275HX 的 Omen Max 16 的直接继任机型。HP 正在以 HyperX 名称为其 Omen 产品线进行品牌重塑,此举已于今年早些时候的 CES 上宣布。
我们的测试机配备 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus CPU、175 W GeForce RTX 5090 GPU 和 2.5K 240 Hz OLED 显示屏,售价约为 4200 美元。较低配置的型号可能会搭载 RTX 5080。
竞争对手包括其他发烧级游戏笔记本电脑,例如 Asus ROG Scar 系列、MSI Raider 或 Titan 系列,以及 Dell Alienware 16 系列。
更多 HP 评测:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
新设计比即将退市的 2025 款略厚、略重,给人一种内部布局非常紧凑的感觉。不过,其紧实且不易变形的表面,比典型的超薄游戏本更让人觉得经久耐用,包括 HP 自家的 Omen Transcend 16 系列。
连接性
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
网络摄像头

可持续性
与标准版 Omen 16非常相似,键盘键帽采用消费后回收塑料制成,但未提及其他部件或回收材料的用量。包装中使用了少量塑料来包裹电源适配器。
显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 482.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.02 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
calibrated: 0.49
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
93.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
CCT: 6432 K
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr Samsung SDC4234, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr BOE0CD1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW ATNA60HU06-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Aorus Master 16 AM6J Samsung ATNA60HU02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -16% | -6% | -3% | -2% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1138 | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 99.7 0% | 73 -27% | 91.7 -8% | 95.9 -4% | 99.3 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 98.8 -1% | 97.5 -2% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 93.5 | 98.2 5% | 75 -20% | 84.8 -9% | 88.2 -6% | 87.5 -6% |
| Response Times | -11% | -2272% | -79% | -8% | -7% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.28 ? | 0.29 ? -4% | 5.6 ? -1900% | 0.81 ? -189% | 0.371 ? -33% | 0.28 ? -0% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.39 ? | 0.47 ? -21% | 10.7 ? -2644% | 0.22 ? 44% | 0.206 ? 47% | 0.39 ? -0% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1439.8 ? | 960 ? | 1440 ? | 1158 ? | 1440 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 29 | 31 -7% | 56 -93% | 40 -38% | 35 -21% | |
| Screen | -29% | -76% | -9% | -62% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 482.7 | 376.5 -22% | 569.7 18% | 512 6% | 468 -3% | 478.6 -1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 487 | 382 -22% | 545 12% | 515 6% | 467 -4% | 481 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 96 -2% | 90 -8% | 98 0% | 96 -2% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.47 | 0.01 | 0.03 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.02 | 3.67 -22% | 3.31 -10% | 1.5 50% | 4 -32% | 0.62 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.01 | 7.24 -20% | 7.15 -19% | 3.4 43% | 6.59 -10% | 2.87 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 0.94 -92% | 0.67 -37% | |||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.1 -22% | 5.3 -489% | 2.3 -156% | 3.8 -322% | 0.7 22% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.597 85% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6432 101% | 6319 103% | 6361 102% | 6589 99% | 6626 98% | 6535 99% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1212 | 51200 | 15600 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-18% | -788% /
-427% | -31% /
-26% | -24% /
-34% | 5% /
10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.19 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.14 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1439.8 Hz Amplitude: 29 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1439.8 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1439.8 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7605 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式,并将 Omen Gaming Hub 设置为狂暴模式。
处理器性能
Cinebench R15 多轮循环测试
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi | CPU Single Thread
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H -2! | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -2! | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 -2! | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW -4! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z -4! | |
| Cinebench 2026 / CPU Multi | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (7835 - 9542, n=6) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Cinebench 2026 / CPU Single Thread | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (556 - 581, n=6) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (14397 - 16433, n=6) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (840 - 913, n=6) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (5617 - 6330, n=6) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (303 - 350, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (19855 - 22850, n=7) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (3100 - 3228, n=7) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (23839 - 28263, n=6) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (2251 - 2357, n=6) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (32.6 - 44.4, n=6) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
| MSI Crosshair A16 HX E8WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 7 16 AGP11 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (0.3788 - 0.3951, n=6) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX9H | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J -1! | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ -1! | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -1! | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (29285 - 43239, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (152663 - 218895, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (7331 - 10115, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (n=1) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (13019 - 14874, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (81013 - 115371, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (119656 - 143205, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (1622 - 2340, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (15810 - 23843, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (51134 - 65272, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (5428 - 8765, n=6) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Single Precision GPU 1.7 | Half Precision GPU 1.7 | Quantized GPU 1.7
| Performance rating | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J -3! | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (11015 - 12414, n=4) | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (11316 - 12187, n=4) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16305 - 25323, n=4) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (17503 - 19954, n=4) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2177 - 2401, n=4) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1994 - 2213, n=4) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2490 - 2786, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1766 - 2249, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (351 - 369, n=4) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (310 - 336, n=4) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (393 - 421, n=4) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (31828 - 33821, n=3) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.7 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (55223 - 58997, n=3) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.7 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (25151 - 26322, n=3) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 12093 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (76912 - 93930, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (84638 - 98574, n=7) | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (76094 - 100988, n=7) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (100.7 - 108.4, n=7) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限流:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU 性能
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 27362 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 74460 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 39471 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 24294 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 6413 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J -3! | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -2! | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ | |
| HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| GTA V | |
| 3840x2160 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:FX AF:8x | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (150.7 - 186.6, n=11) | |
| 3840x2160 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (84.4 - 123.2, n=13) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5080 OC | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (131.2 - 193.1, n=18) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
| Strange Brigade - 3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (151.4 - 187.2, n=18) | |
| Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
| F1 24 | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5080 OC | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (66 - 93.6, n=15) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition | |
| NVIDIA Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5080 OC | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (39.3 - 54.8, n=19) | |
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (114 - 116, n=2) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (76 - 79, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (59 - 62, n=2) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (35 - 37, n=2) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing + DLSS Balanced AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (93 - 97, n=2) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Extended Raytracing + DLSS Balanced AA:T | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (78 - 82, n=2) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 超高画质 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 162.6 | 160.9 | 183.4 | |||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 248 | 215 | 202 | 186.9 | 171.7 | |||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 210 | 181.5 | 104.9 | |||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 154.7 | 140.5 | 113.9 | 98.1 | ||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 447 | 341 | 183.3 | |||||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 233 | 227 | 168.2 | 142.3 | 92.9 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 180.6 | 166.3 | 134.6 | 119.7 | 64.4 | 53.9 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 165.3 | 166.7 | 110.5 | 93.6 | 54.8 | |||
| Forza Horizon 6 (2026) | 90.4 | 79.4 | 79 | 71.1 | 55.7 | 40 | ||
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced (2026) | 116 | 79 | 97 | 62 | 82 | 37 |
排放量
系统噪声
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.8 / 25.7 / 30.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39 / 61.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | 2% | -11% | -15% | 2% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.8 | 22.8 4% | 23.8 -0% | 24.4 -3% | 25 -5% | 23.1 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.8 | 29 -22% | 24.2 -2% | 32.8 -38% | 28 -18% | 26.6 -12% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.7 | 29 -13% | 24.2 6% | 32.8 -28% | 29 -13% | 26.7 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30.6 | 29 5% | 25.3 17% | 32.8 -7% | 35 -14% | 26.9 12% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 39 | 47.7 -22% | 45.7 -17% | 42.6 -9% | 58 -49% | 36 8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.4 | 54.8 -1% | 54.7 -1% | 54.8 -1% | 59 -8% | 51.1 6% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 61.8 | 61.1 1% | 54.7 11% | 54.8 11% | 60 3% | 60.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.2 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-4.8 °C / -8.7 F).
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -3% | -12% | -19% | -1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.8 | 42.8 2% | 40.2 8% | 46.3 -6% | 50 -14% | 43.2 1% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.4 | 50.2 -18% | 43 -1% | 45.9 -8% | 52 -23% | 45.6 -8% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28.6 | 27.6 3% | 30 -5% | 32.1 -12% | 27.8 3% | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28.6 | 26.2 8% | 33 -15% | 34.5 -21% | 29 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | 330 | 50 | 39 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 4.0 | -- | 102 | 48 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 3.3 | 1987 | 101 | 74 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 压力测试(平衡模式) | 1.8 | 1552 | 91 | 69 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 压力测试(性能模式) | 2.0 | 2182 | 103 | 80 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 压力测试(Unleashed 模式) | 2.3 | 2325 | 103 | 77 |
HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
能源管理
功耗
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, , OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL82T0HBL1, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BTW, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | 14% | 36% | 4% | 18% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.5 | 9.9 -32% | 10.7 -43% | 7.8 -4% | 14.4 -92% | 7.2 4% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 21 | 28.6 -36% | 15.4 27% | 13.3 37% | 16.8 20% | 12 43% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 44.4 | 47.1 -6% | 44.1 1% | 13.6 69% | 19.3 57% | 32.8 26% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 146.4 | 141.8 3% | 125.9 14% | 122.9 16% | 151 -3% | 133 9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 341 | 230 33% | 236 31% | 188.1 45% | 275 19% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 343 | 253 26% | 239 30% | 190 45% | 272 21% | 276 20% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 420.9 | 233 45% | 269.2 36% | 245.6 42% | 338 20% | 404.5 4% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 Cyberpunk / 压力测试
功率 消耗 外接 显示器
电池续航时间
| HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh | HP HyperX Omen 16 16-ap1931nr R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 83 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh | Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | MSI Raider 16 Max HX B2WJ Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 91.8 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -21% | -47% | 70% | -29% | 8% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 7.3 | 5.8 -21% | 3.9 -47% | 12.4 70% | 5.2 -29% | 7.9 8% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 8.7 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.2 |
Notebookcheck 评分
HP Omen Max 16 不惜采用硕大的机身并发出高噪声,以尽可能释放 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 和 175 W GeForce RTX 5090 GPU 的性能。
HP Omen Max 16-ah1932nr
- 10/10/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
对比中的潜在竞争对手
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.















































































