结论
AMD的Strix Halo系列旨在将强大的处理器与性能尤为出色的集成显卡相结合。 虽然搭载Radeon 8060S的Ryzen AI Max+ Pro 395和搭载Radeon 8050S的Ryzen AI Max Pro 390在我们的测试中都表现出色，但本文评测的Ryzen AI Max Pro 380却很难脱颖而出。 其搭载的 Radeon 8040S 虽然比 Radeon 890M 和英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 等曾领跑的集成显卡性能更强，但优势有时相当有限，尤其是考虑到满载时的发热量和功耗往往明显更高。
测试配置还受到内存容量有限的制约。16 GB 的 DDR5 内存无法升级，这无谓地限制了系统的潜力，特别是对于必须共享系统内存的集成显卡而言。
除此之外，ZBook Ultra G1a 的 14 英寸版本再次给人留下了深刻印象。 其亮点包括非常坚固、质感上乘的机身，配备两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口的现代化连接性，以及一款分辨率达 2,880 x 1,800 像素、支持 120 Hz 刷新率和触控功能的鲜艳、高对比度 OLED 显示屏。
Pros
Cons
- $1,999.99HP ZBook Ultra G1a, 14" Touch, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, 32GB RAM, 512GB SSD
- $2,099.99HP ZBook Ultra G1a, 14" FHD+, Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, 32GB DDR5, 1TB SSD
- $2,077.77HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Mobile Workstation - WUXGA - AMD Ryzen AI MAX PRO 390-32 GB - 1 TB SSD - English Keyboard - Meteor Silver - Smart Buy - AMD Chip - 1920 x 1200 - Windows 11 Pro - Radeon 8050S
Table of Contents
规格
机箱、连接性及输入设备
ZBook Ultra G1a 的重量约为 1.6 公斤，目前是 14 英寸笔记本电脑中较重的一款，但作为回报，用户将获得一款非常坚固的金属机身，其质感恰到好处地彰显了高端品质。我们会将这款设计描述为时尚而低调。坚固的铰链也无可挑剔。
在接口方面，该设备配备了音频插孔、HDMI输出接口和肯辛顿锁孔，以及共计四个USB接口，其中三个为USB-C接口，每个均支持Power Delivery和DisplayPort。遗憾的是，该设备未配备读卡器。 不过，Wi-Fi 7 模块的表现非常出色。500 万像素的网络摄像头同样令人印象深刻，能呈现出清晰锐利的画面。
输入设备也相当出色。白色背光键盘的按键反馈良好，而触感舒适的触控板尺寸为 12.5 × 8 厘米，空间绰绰有余。
| Networking - iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average of class Workstation (2150 - 2300, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (1736 - 2300, n=9) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
显示
测试机型搭载了与顶配型号相同的OLED面板，因此大部分测试结果非常接近。除了表面反光严重以及存在屏幕闪烁（这可能会影响敏感用户）之外，OLED在此几乎只有优点。
除了出色的黑位和对比度，以及快速的响应时间外，该面板还拥有非常宽广的色域，甚至几乎完全覆盖了AdobeRGB色域。平均亮度略低于400 cd/m²，这一数值既不算差，也不算特别出色。值得肯定的是，即使未经校准，其色彩准确度也已相当出色。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 397 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.88 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
97.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.203
CCT: 6509 K
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES SDC41B3, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET LGD07A1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Samsung SDC41B3, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI LG Philips LGD07A1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Samsung SDC4215, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -23% | -1% | -26% | -19% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 65.8 -34% | 99.7 0% | 62.6 -37% | 69.9 -30% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 97.4 -3% | 100 0% | 93.2 -7% | 98.4 -2% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 97.1 | 67.1 -31% | 95.6 -2% | 64 -34% | 71.6 -26% | 92.3 -5% |
| Response Times | -5673% | -44% | -6338% | -5134% | 1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.66 ? | 52 ? -7779% | 0.94 ? -42% | 55.8 ? -8355% | 42.3 ? -6309% | 0.58 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.69 ? | 25.3 ? -3567% | 1.01 ? -46% | 30.5 ? -4320% | 28 ? -3958% | 0.87 ? -26% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 476 | 492.6 | 927.13 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 30 | 43 -43% | 25 17% | |||
| Screen | -60% | -12% | -124% | -28% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 397 | 406 2% | 384.7 -3% | 442.8 12% | 487.5 23% | 446 12% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 396 | 379 -4% | 387 -2% | 412 4% | 469 18% | 447 13% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 89 -9% | 99 1% | 87 -11% | 91 -7% | 99 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.26 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.88 | 3.3 -76% | 3.36 -79% | 5.92 -215% | 2.37 -26% | 1.76 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.57 | 6.4 -15% | 6.45 -16% | 10.46 -88% | 5.77 -4% | 3.29 41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 5 -257% | 1 29% | 7.6 -443% | 3.8 -171% | 2.3 -64% |
| Gamma | 2.203 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.26 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6509 100% | 6163 105% | 6380 102% | 6728 97% | 6540 99% | 6470 100% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1450 | 2013 | 1875 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 0.65 | 1.31 | 0.86 | 1.18 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1919% /
-1070% | -19% /
-17% | -2163% /
-1227% | -1727% /
-954% | 0% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.37 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.33 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 476 Hz Amplitude: 30 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 476 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 476 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7667 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
就性能而言，我们将该测试配置归类为中端产品。惠普明确将这款14英寸机型定位为移动工作站，这也与我们用于评估的分类相符。
测试条件
预装的 myHP 软件允许用户在两种运行模式之间进行选择。除电池测试外，我们的测量均采用“高性能”配置文件进行，该配置文件能进一步提升系统性能，如下表所示。
| 模式 | Smart Sense |
| 高性能《赛博朋克2077》噪音 | |
| 43 dB(A) | |
| 46 dB(A) | |
| 《赛博朋克2077》帧率（FHD/极高画质） | |
| 31.3 fps | |
| 33.2 fps | |
| CPU PL1 | |
| 60 W | |
| 70 W | |
| CPU PL2 | |
| 71 W | |
| 81 W | |
| Cinebench R15 多核得分 | |
| 2103 分 | |
| 2177 分 |
处理器性能
Max+ Pro 395 配备 16 核 32 线程，Max Pro 390 配备 12 核 24 线程，而 Max Pro 380 则仅配备 6 核 12 线程。 不出所料，在我们的 CPU 基准测试套件中，该芯片的表现远落后于其兄弟机型。
总体而言，Max Pro 380 的性能介于较慢的 Core Ultra 7 268V 和较快的 Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 375 之间。英特尔的 Core Ultra X9 388H 同样更快。 至少在 Cinebench 循环测试中，其测试结果始终非常稳定。
Cinebench R15 多核耐力测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 -1! | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET -1! | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI -1! | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES -1! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 -1! | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 -1! | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (16730 - 61611, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Workstation (89740 - 186971, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (3590 - 8975, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (60778 - 144411, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (8165 - 29343, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Workstation (44497 - 98153, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (72108 - 187841, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (917 - 2148, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Workstation (8545 - 32891, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Workstation (37482 - 93684, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Workstation (7502 - 7823, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统与存储性能
就系统性能而言，这款14英寸机型在对比测试中排名处于中游水平，而内存表现则如预期般较为欠佳。另一方面，预装的512 GB三星固态硬盘表现中规中矩，其性能与大多数竞品基本持平。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average of class Workstation | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average of class Workstation (6563 - 10409, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Average of class Workstation (9622 - 11157, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| Average of class Workstation (8789 - 20616, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| Average of class Workstation (8108 - 15631, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1307 - 2267, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average of class Workstation (1130 - 2122, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| Average of class Workstation (1657 - 2725, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average of class Workstation (993 - 2096, n=22, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average of class Workstation (260 - 360, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| Average of class Workstation (189.2 - 326, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, AMD Radeon 8040S (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average of class Workstation (411 - 538, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7924 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average of class Workstation (56003 - 164795, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| Average of class Workstation (55795 - 121563, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average of class Workstation (55663 - 214520, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Average of class Workstation (84.5 - 165.2, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU与游戏性能
默认情况下，惠普将 16 GB 系统内存配置为仅向 Radeon 8040S 提供 4 GB 可用内存。 如今，至少需要两倍于此的内存会更理想，尽管将内存划分为 8 GB 分配给 iGPU、8 GB 分配给系统其余部分，会对整体性能造成过大的负担。 即便采用现有的 4 + 12 GB 分配方案，在日常 Windows 使用中，系统响应速度也并非总是令人满意。因此，惠普本应从一开始就为该配置配备 32 GB 内存——鉴于这款笔记本相对较高的售价，无论当前内存成本如何，这本是理所应当的。
在此配置下，Radeon 8040S的性能表现仅属一般。无论在合成测试还是游戏基准测试中，Radeon 8050S和Radeon 8060S通常都快得多。该显卡在面对英特尔的Arc B390时也常常力不从心，尽管在此场景下的差距要小得多。
像《Dota 2》这样较旧和/或对硬件要求较低的游戏，即使在高或最高画质设置下也能流畅运行，但当前或对硬件要求更高的游戏通常需要将分辨率降至1,920 x 1,080像素，并将细节设置调至最低或低档。 在《死亡搁浅2》和《007：第一缕曙光》等极端情况下，甚至需要启用FSR技术才能获得流畅的帧率。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 47073 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 51094 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 17208 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39381 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 10931 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4313 points | |
Help | ||
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 141.2 | 111.2 | 107.6 | 93.1 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 63 | 53.9 | 45 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 52.9 | 43 | 34.1 | 33.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 60.6 | 46 | 36 | 33.2 |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 41.3 | 29.5 | 21 | 9.5 |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 69 | 61 | 46 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 52.7 | 30.6 | 30.3 | 0 () |
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 30 | 25.4 | 22.3 | 16.3 |
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 37.6 | 21.7 | 19.2 | 15.8 |
| Pragmata (2026) | 51 | 34 | 19.8 | |
| 007 First Light (2026) | 30.3 | 27 | 24.1 | 20.1 |
| Assassin's Creed Black Flag Resynced (2026) | 36 | 28 | 24 | 13 |
《赛博朋克2077》极致画质帧率图表
排放与能源
噪声排放
虽然 ZBook Ultra G1a 在空闲时通常相当安静，风扇偶尔会完全停止运转，但在满载运行时，系统发出的噪音会变得清晰可闻，最高可达 48 dB(A)。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42 / 48 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, Radeon 8040S | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, Radeon 8050S | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -1% | 10% | -1% | 5% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 24.6 -3% | 23.9 -0% | 24 -0% | 28.2 -18% | 23.3 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 24.6 -3% | 23.9 -0% | 24.4 -2% | 28.4 -18% | 23.3 3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 24.6 2% | 23.9 4% | 24.4 2% | 28.4 -14% | 23.3 7% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 24.6 5% | 26.8 -3% | 24.5 6% | 28.8 -11% | 23.3 10% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 42 | 40.7 3% | 42.2 -0% | 25.4 40% | 33.5 20% | 42.9 -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46 | 45.4 1% | 49.1 -7% | 39.3 15% | 39.1 15% | 44.4 3% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48 | 45.4 5% | 49.2 -3% | 43.1 10% | 40.4 16% | 44.1 8% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与噪音水平类似，在3D负载下温度也会变得明显。在使用FurMark和Prime95进行压力测试时，机箱部分区域的温度超过了50 °C。一段时间后，APU的平均温度达到79 °C，这一数值仍在可接受范围内。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 41.1 °C / 106 F
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-9.2 °C / -16.6 F).
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, Radeon 8040S | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, Radeon 8050S | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 18% | 23% | 31% | 33% | 17% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 50 | 43 14% | 41.4 17% | 36 28% | 35 30% | 40.2 20% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 51 | 40.4 21% | 36.6 28% | 34.2 33% | 33.4 35% | 44.2 13% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 31.2 | 34 | 25 | 23.8 | 22.8 | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 32.5 | 33.6 | 25.6 | 24.2 | 23.4 |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
作为一款14英寸笔记本电脑，ZBook Ultra G1a的音质出乎意料地出色，令人印象深刻。只是低音部分如果能再强劲一些就更好了。
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 17%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗与电池续航时间
测试配置的平均待机功耗约为7瓦，符合预期，且相当省电。在满载状态下，我们测得最大功耗为126瓦，这对随附的140瓦电源适配器来说不成问题。不过，尤其是基于英特尔平台的系统，在这方面表现得更为节电。
在降低屏幕亮度进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中，电池续航时间略低于 9 小时。这是一个不错的成绩，尽管许多竞争对手的续航时间更长。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 6.2 / 7.3 / 12.8 Watt |
| Load |
82 / 126 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, Radeon 8040S | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, Radeon 8050S | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -6% | 9% | 52% | 47% | -42% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.2 | 4.5 27% | 6.9 -11% | 6.5 -5% | 2.5 60% | 2.5 60% | 8.89 ? -43% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.3 | 7.5 -3% | 7.7 -5% | 8.7 -19% | 5.4 26% | 5.1 30% | 13.3 ? -82% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 12.8 | 8.3 35% | 14.7 -15% | 10.3 20% | 5.8 55% | 5.8 55% | 17.4 ? -36% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 82 | 80.7 2% | 83.3 -2% | 75.7 8% | 36.9 55% | 49.8 39% | 93.7 ? -14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 110 | 106.5 3% | 110.9 -1% | 76.2 31% | 48.5 56% | 55 50% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 126 | 125.1 1% | 126.3 -0% | 100.7 20% | 54.6 57% | 68 46% | 172.5 ? -37% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 104.1 | 110.5 | 73.1 | 44.9 | 55.1 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES Ryzen AI Max PRO 380, Radeon 8040S, 74.5 Wh | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, Radeon 8050S, 74.5 Wh | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S, 74.5 Wh | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M, 74.5 Wh | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 15% | -23% | 56% | 103% | 38% | -2% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9.1 | 10.5 15% | 7 -23% | 14.2 56% | 18.5 103% | 12.6 38% | 8.91 ? -2% |
| Load (h) | 1.2 | 1.358 ? | |||||
| Reader / Idle (h) | 21.2 | 26.1 ? |
Notebookcheck 综合评分
由于内存配置有限，且Radeon 8040S的性能表现较为平庸，因此很难推荐本文测试的这款机型。 如果还有人对这款总体表现尚可的 ZBook Ultra G1a 14 感兴趣，最好选择搭载 Radeon 8050S 的更强版本，在某些情况下，其价格几乎不会高出多少。
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES
- 08/21/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 替代方案一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.6%  | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 B30FBES AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8040S ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,999.99 HP ZBook Ultra G1a, 14" Touc... 2. $2,099.99 HP ZBook Ultra G1a, 14" FHD+... 3. $2,077.77 HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Mobil... List Price: 2000 EUR | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 85.4%  | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8050S ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2545 Euro | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED |
3. 87.4%  | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4000 USD | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 88.7%  | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2200 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 85.1%  | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3300 USD | 1.2 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
6. 87.9%  | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 2800 USD | 1.3 kg | 10.7 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
