结论 - 高端硬件，软件受限
全新的 HP Googlebook 14c 给人一种高端设备的感觉 - 出色的做工、高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏、良好的输入设备和出色的扬声器。它还搭载了 Snapdragon X1 Extreme CPU，考虑到只能运行 Android 应用，这甚至显得有些性能过剩。而这正是最大的问题，因为最新的 Googlebook OS 仍然给人一种很像 Chrome OS 的感觉，本质上仍是一款高度依赖 Google 服务的在线设备，包括 Gemini AI，而这些服务大多数时候都需要连接互联网。因此，Googlebook 14c 不提供内置 5G 连接功能，实在令人遗憾。HP Googlebook 14c 的接口配置总体上极其有限，只有两个 USB-C 端口。Asus Googlebook（USB-C、USB-A、HDMI、读卡器）等竞争产品在这方面更胜一筹。
目前的另一个问题是，一些 Android 应用根本无法在 Googlebook OS 上运行，而且我们也不知道近期是否会有更新。因此，这款产品有点奇怪，因为虽然硬件质感高端，但软件的局限性实在很大。HP 的 Googlebook 在电池续航方面也不算出色。测试结果并不差，但考虑到它配备了 70 Wh 的大容量电池，我们原本期待它能有更好的表现。屏幕也不支持 HDR，而这并非 Googlebook OS 的限制，因为其他机型支持 HDR。我们希望 HP 能尽快通过软件更新解决这个问题。
总而言之，全新的 HP Googlebook 14c 让我们有些困惑。诚然，机身不错，屏幕观感也很好，但除了硬件方面的不足之外，最大的问题还是 Googlebook OS。花 1300 美元，你可以在 Windows 阵营中找到许多选择，也可以选择 Apple 出色的 MacBook Air，因此我们实在不太明白，为什么要花这么多钱购买一款操作系统如此受限的产品。
Pros
Cons
规格参数
机身、连接性与输入设备
全新的 HP Googlebook 14c 毫无疑问是一款高端产品。深蓝色金属机身做工出色，结构也很稳固，如果没有 Googlebook 标识，你很难将它与昂贵的 HP Spectre 笔记本电脑区分开来。尽管颜色较深，机身底座并不容易留下指纹，只有顶盖稍微容易沾染一些。顶盖上还有一条小型 RGB 灯带，可以显示充电状态，或根据 Gemini 输入作出反应，但它更多是为了向其他用户表明你正在使用 Googlebook。铰链调校得当，屏幕仅有轻微晃动（最大开合角度约 135°）。底盖仅由四颗螺丝固定，拆下后可以清理两个风扇并更换 M.2-2280 SSD。
在连接性方面，它仅配备两个 USB-C 接口，且不支持 USB 4.0，这并不理想，但对目标用户群体而言可能没那么重要。它配备了高速 Wi-Fi 7 模块，以及表现不错的 500 万像素摄像头，后者带有红外传感器和机械遮挡盖。不支持 5G 连接。
背光键盘给人的感受好坏参半。按键响应精准，但就我们的偏好而言，按键手感略硬，敲击声也稍大。昂贵的 EliteBook 在这方面明显更有优势。触觉反馈触控板表现良好，手势操作也不例外。
显示屏 - 2.8K OLED 触摸屏
HP 为 Googlebook 14c 提供 Full-HD OLED 屏幕，以及我们评测机型配备的 2.8K OLED 屏幕（两者均为触摸屏）。2.8K 版本（2880 x 1800 像素）支持 120 Hz 刷新率，主观画质非常好，不过触控层会对画面产生轻微影响，且仅在较明亮的画面区域可见。屏幕的反光也非常明显，在户外使用时会成为一个问题。此外，屏幕还存在 PWM 闪烁，不过其频率高达 960 Hz，对大多数用户而言应该不会造成太大问题。
我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件进行的分析显示，屏幕亮度超过 500 尼特，但不支持 HDR 内容。不过，这似乎是 HP 的软件问题，因为其他 Googlebook（例如 Acer 或 Asus 的机型）提供了 HDR 亮度设置。色彩准确度尚可，但 P3 色域覆盖率仅为 83 %，而且没有切换至 sRGB 色域的选项，因此无法用于专业图像编辑。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 515 cd/m²
Contrast: 25750:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.69}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.94}
80.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
83.2% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 6483 K
| HP Googlebook 14c OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V TM140VDXY02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | Dell 14 Plus BOE NE14N42, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 90 Hz | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA ATNA40KW01-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -12% | -8% | 10% | 7% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 83.2 | 69.3 -17% | 71.7 -14% | 99.6 20% | 96.5 16% | 98.1 18% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 92.2 -8% | 99.9 0% | 98.9 -1% | 97.8 -2% | 98.6 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 80.6 | 72.9 -10% | 71.9 -11% | 88.7 10% | 86.5 7% | 86.8 8% |
| Response Times | -3045% | -3488% | -36% | -2700% | -1978% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 2 ? | 36.2 ? -1710% | 42.7 ? -2035% | 1.65 ? 17% | 38.8 ? -1840% | 24.3 ? -1115% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.5 ? | 22.4 ? -4380% | 25.2 ? -4940% | 1.41 ? -182% | 18.3 ? -3560% | 14.7 ? -2840% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 960 ? | 480 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 52 | 22 58% | ||||
| Screen | -124% | -124% | -2% | -250% | -232% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 515 | 349 -32% | 354 -31% | 302 -41% | 617 20% | 546 6% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 519 | 322 -38% | 333 -36% | 304 -41% | 623 20% | 519 0% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 82 -16% | 92 -6% | 98 0% | 91 -7% | 90 -8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.02 | 0.18 -800% | 0.21 -950% | 0.01 50% | 0.44 -2100% | 0.38 -1800% |
| Contrast (:1) | 25750 | 1939 -92% | 1686 -93% | 30200 17% | 1402 -95% | 1437 -94% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.62 10% | 1.94 33% | 2.1 28% | 0.9 69% | 2.1 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.2 | 5.56 10% | 3.28 47% | 6 3% | 2.2 65% | 4 35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 3.61 -34% | 1.4 48% | 3.6 -33% | 2 26% | 3.3 -22% |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% | 2.12 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6483 100% | 7223 90% | 6453 101% | 6451 101% | 6810 95% | 7127 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 6.46 | 0.7 | 0.9 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1060% /
-547% | -1207% /
-614% | -9% /
-7% | -981% /
-568% | -734% /
-445% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 52 % | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7603 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Snapdragon X1 Elite
测试条件
HP Googlebook 14c 没有可供选择的性能模式。
处理器性能
HP 使用了 Snapdragon X1E-80-100，这令人意外。首先，它显然是一款第一代 Snapdragon 芯片；其次，这款 CPU 性能相当强劲，最高睿频可达 4 GHz。根据功耗，我们估计其最大 TDP 约为 45 瓦，因此它的性能不容小觑。适用于 Android 的 CPU 基准测试并不多，我们在这里基本上只能使用 Geekbench 和浏览器基准测试。CPU 的原始性能（单核和多核）表现不错，但不及 Surface Laptop 13.8 中的新款 Snapdragon X2 Plus。使用电池供电时，性能不会下降。
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Jetstream 2: 2.2 Total
Speedometer 3: Score 3.0
Geekbench 7.0: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench AI: Single Precision CPU 1.7 | Half Precision CPU 1.7 | Quantized CPU 1.7
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 -3! | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Dell 14 Plus -7! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 -4! | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V -2! | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA -2! | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (7596 - 14998, n=10) | |
| Dell 14 Plus | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 17846, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Dell 14 Plus | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1896 - 2874, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2988, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (279 - 324, n=8) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Dell 14 Plus | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Average of class Office (104.2 - 313, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Jetstream 2 / 2.2 Total | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (n=1) | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average of class Office (187.4 - 485, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Speedometer 3 / Score 3.0 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average of class Office (18.6 - 38.4, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (23.8 - 37.3, n=6) | |
| Geekbench 7.0 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Office (10821 - 17682, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench 7.0 / Single-Core | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (2433 - 2643, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision CPU 1.7 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average of class Office (1515 - 5281, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision CPU 1.7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
| Average of class Office (812 - 8079, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized CPU 1.7 | |
| HP Googlebook 14c | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average of class Office (3899 - 8706, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V | |
| Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA | |
系统和存储设备
Googlebook 14c 运行流畅，而且 HP 使用了 PCIe 4.0 SSD，因此不存在性能瓶颈。不过，Googlebook OS 对触控板操作的适配还不够完善，手势功能也相当基础。例如，它没有用于切换不同桌面的手势，每次都必须通过两个手势才能完成切换。我们还遇到了一些外置 SSD 无法使用的问题。与智能手机的跨设备接续功能也要求 Android 17，因此目前许多用户还无法使用这项功能。我们将在几天后的一篇独立文章中更详细地介绍 Googlebook OS 的新功能。
GPU 和游戏性能
集成 GPU 为 Adreno X1-85，其性能足以流畅运行任何 Android 应用。不过，游戏支持非常有限，因为 Googlebook 不支持 Fortnite 或 PUBG 等一些热门 Android 游戏。我们尚不确定是否会有更新，也不清楚何时会推出。目前，玩游戏的最佳选择是 GeForce Now 这样的云游戏服务。无论是在持续负载下，还是使用电池供电时，GPU 性能都很稳定。
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2119 points | |
Help | ||
排放与功耗
系统噪声
HP 使用了配备两个风扇的散热装置，Googlebook 14c 通常无声或非常安静。在日常任务中，我们几乎从未听到风扇声，只有在 CPU 满载时，噪声才会达到最高 37 dB(A)，虽然可以听到，但并不会造成明显干扰。我们也没有发现评测机发出任何其他电子噪声。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 24.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 29.6 / 37.2 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) | ||
| HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell 14 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | -2% | -2% | -1% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.8 | 24.9 -0% | 23.8 4% | 24.6 1% | 25.1 -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.8 | 24.9 -0% | 23.8 4% | 24.6 1% | 25.1 -1% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.8 | 24.9 -0% | 23.8 4% | 24.6 1% | 25.1 -1% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.8 | 25 -1% | 23.8 4% | 24.6 1% | 25.1 -1% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 29.6 | 35.4 -20% | 31.4 -6% | 26.1 12% | 25.1 15% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 37.2 | 44.9 -21% | 45.2 -22% | 47.4 -27% | 42.4 -14% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 35.2 | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 44.9 | 42 | 32.5 | 37.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在轻负载下，Googlebook 14c 是一款温度很低的笔记本电脑，但如果让 CPU 承受高负载，相对较低的风扇噪声就意味着机身温度会很高。我们测得键盘上部中央区域的温度超过 50 °C，底部温度也超过 50 °C，因此打字和将其放在腿上使用都会受到影响。虽然这对 Googlebook 来说绝对不是常见的使用场景，但仍有可能发生，而这完全是 Snapdragon X1 Extreme CPU 的高 TDP 配置所致。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.8 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 34.4 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.6 °C / -6.5 F).
| HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell 14 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | -1% | 7% | 9% | 13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 50.8 | 39.4 22% | 43 15% | 41.6 18% | 44.4 13% | 44.1 13% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 51.6 | 39.1 24% | 42.6 17% | 43.8 15% | 42.5 18% | 42.4 18% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26.4 | 32.3 -22% | 31.6 -20% | 27 -2% | 25.9 2% | 23.7 10% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.6 | 32.8 -23% | 30.6 -15% | 27.1 -2% | 26 2% | 23.8 11% |
* ... smaller is better
扬声器
音响系统由四个扬声器组成。音质确实很好，比 Microsoft 的 Surface Laptop 8 或 Apple 的 MacBook Air 13 更出色。
HP Googlebook 14c audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Dell 14 Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗和电池续航时间
使用默认深色背景图像时，待机功耗非常低，但请注意，较亮的图像会明显增加 OLED 屏幕的功耗（例如，使用明亮壁纸时，我们测得的最高待机功耗达到了 8 瓦）。在最大负载下，我们测得的功耗最高为 64 瓦，因此建议使用 65W 电源适配器。
HP 为 Googlebook 14c 配备了 70 Wh 电池，但在亮度为 150 尼特的标准 Wi-Fi 测试中，续航时间略低于 14 小时，有些令人失望。使用 65W 电源适配器时，充电时间为 1 小时 47 分钟（41 分钟后充至 50 %；1 小时 06 分钟后充至 80%）。我们很快会补充更多电池续航测试。
| Off / Standby | 0.28 / 0.47 Watt |
| Idle | 2.3 / 3.6 / 3.7 Watt |
| Load |
22.5 / 64.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-512G-1002, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, SAMSUNG MZAMX512HDLV-00BL2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell 14 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL8512HFLU-00BLL, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -82% | -62% | -19% | -37% | -54% | -54% | -78% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.3 | 3.9 -70% | 3.6 -57% | 3 -30% | 1.7 26% | 1.8 22% | 3.53 ? -53% | 4 ? -74% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 3.6 | 6.4 -78% | 6.7 -86% | 5 -39% | 6.8 -89% | 9.3 -158% | 6.68 ? -86% | 7.04 ? -96% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 3.7 | 10.3 -178% | 6.9 -86% | 5.2 -41% | 7.5 -103% | 9.4 -154% | 7.59 ? -105% | 8.24 ? -123% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 22.5 | 42.9 -91% | 41.2 -83% | 17.2 24% | 28 -24% | 29.4 -31% | 29.6 ? -32% | 44.2 ? -96% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 64.2 | 59 8% | 62.6 2% | 70 -9% | 61.3 5% | 30.4 53% | 61.3 ? 5% | 65.1 ? -1% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 42.9 | 36.6 | 19.4 | 37.9 | 18.9 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 43 | 34.2 | 20.2 | 38.1 | 17.7 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Googlebook 14c SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Dell 14 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45, 54 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU, 53.8 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||||
| WiFi Websurfing (h) | 13.8 | 16.9 22% | 14.3 4% | 20.2 46% | 18.9 37% | 16.2 17% | 13.9 ? 1% |
Notebookcheck 评分
HP Googlebook 14c
- 10/11/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.2%  | HP Googlebook 14c Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1199€ | 1.3 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 84.8%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 14x, ILL, Ultra 5 226V Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 949€ | 1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
3. 83.4%  | Dell 14 Plus Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 1100 USD | 1.5 kg | 16.95 mm | 14.00" 2560x1600 216 PPI IPS |
4. 85.6%  | Asus Zenbook 14 UX3480QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $48.88 1pcs Cooler Fans for ASUS 14... 2. $1,199.99 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED Touchsc... 3. $13.55 GinTai Bottom Cover Screws f... List Price: 999€ | 1.1 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 88.4%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1699€ | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" 2304x1536 201 PPI IPS |
6. 91.6%  | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 8-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1199€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
