Notebookcheck

联想ThinkPad P17 G2笔记本电脑评论。具有内部升级功能的大型工作站

巨石号。 联想的P系列ThinkPads与传统的ThinkPads保持一致。虽然这不一定是件坏事,但16:9显示屏周围的显示边框可以稍微窄一些。然而,联想工作站在关键的地方大放异彩,提供了出色的性能和可扩展性。
Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
ThinkPad Thunderbolt Workstation Windows Laptop / Notebook Business Tiger Lake

17英寸的外形因素远远不是最受欢迎的选择,特别是当涉及到企业客户的商务笔记本电脑时。后一类的系统必须是小而轻的,以便有更大的便携性。尽管联想ThinkPad P17 G2也很便携,但这款移动工作站的大重量和大尺寸使其更适合固定使用。它是唯一提供的17英寸ThinkPad,其主要使用情况是为CAD和其他计算密集型任务提供足够的性能。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Core: 1687 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 60 W TDP, GA107, 471.41, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, 512 GB 
, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 3.0, 431 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC3306
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: SD-Card, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 28.38 x 415.44 x 280.81
Battery
94 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p w/IR & ThinkShutter
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: 6 row Chiclet w/Numpad, 1.8mm key-travel, Keyboard Light: yes, 170W slim-tip charger, Lenovo Commercial Vantage, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
3.565 kg, Power Supply: 575 g
Price
2500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.8 %
10/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
3.6 kg28.38 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.6 %
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
3.5 kg31 mm17.30"1920x1080
89.8 %
09/2021
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
2.9 kg26.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
87 %
02/2021
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2.5 kg19.5 mm17.00"3840x2400
86.4 %
03/2020
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
2.5 kg18.4 mm17.00"1920x1200

ThinkPad机箱。塑料外观,镁质底架

联想ThinkPad P17第二代
联想ThinkPad P17第二代

虽然联想去年已经更新了其最大的工作站,但去年的变化只集中在硬件上。事实上,自从ThinkPad P70上市以来,在设计方面几乎没有任何变化。 ThinkPad P70以来,在设计方面几乎没有任何变化。虽然相比于联想ThinkPad P73,一些小的细节发生了变化,但没有任何重大修订。

这一次,前几代产品中巨大的镁/铝底盖被纤维增强塑料外壳所取代。内部的、传统的ThinkPad结构框架由镁合金组成。因此,底座单元的刚度相当高。塑料上涂有天鹅绒质地的涂层,使其成为污点和指纹磁铁。显示屏盖的刚性令人惊讶,当试图从角落里扭转它时,几乎没有弯曲,在压力下几乎没有任何屈服。不幸的是,掌托的情况并非如此,它在靠近智能卡读卡器的地方很容易弯曲,而且不能顺利过渡到机箱前缘的底座上。

底座内的两个银色金属铰链足够牢固,可以将显示屏固定在原位,同时仍允许用户用一只手打开笔记本电脑。显示器的最大角度大于180度。

虽然我们会用 "传统 "这个相当正面的词来描述其构造,但显示屏边框的大小和机箱本身根本就已经过时了。除了去年的 ThinkPad P73我们的比较中没有其他17英寸工作站超过ThinkPad P17第二代的巨大尺寸,其中包括厚度和重量。 因此,旅行时使用这款联想笔记本电脑可能是个例外。

Size comparison

416 mm 281 mm 31 mm 3.5 kg415.44 mm 280.81 mm 28.38 mm 3.6 kg398.4 mm 267.1 mm 26.9 mm 2.9 kg382 mm 286 mm 18.4 mm 2.5 kg374.45 mm 248.05 mm 19.5 mm 2.5 kg

连接性。联想笔记本电脑有很多端口

宽敞的外壳使联想能够包括众多的端口。也就是说,与ThinkPad P73相比,端口的选择略差,因为ThinkPad P17 G2少提供了一个USB-A端口。应该注意的是,这是第一款支持Thunderbolt 4的P系列笔记本电脑。

与所有P系列的ThinkPad工作站一样,ThinkPad P17 Gen 2通过专有的超薄尖端端口进行充电。虽然据称也支持USB-C电源传输,但它没有识别65W的USB-C充电器。不过,与较小的ThinkPad P1 G4一样,90W的USB-C充电器应该可以使用。

后方。以太网,细长的充电端口,2个雷电4,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2
后方。以太网,细长的充电端口,2个雷电4,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2
左边:HDMI 2.1,USB-A 3.1 Gen 1,SIM卡插槽,3.5毫米音频插孔
左边:HDMI 2.1,USB-A 3.1 Gen 1,SIM卡插槽,3.5毫米音频插孔
对。智能卡、SD读卡器、USB-A 3.1 Gen 1、Kensington锁
对。智能卡、SD读卡器、USB-A 3.1 Gen 1、Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

用我们的128GB AV Pro microSD V60参考卡进行的基准测试显示了集成读卡器的快速速度。其性能与其他工作站笔记本电脑相当。当完全插入时,SD卡与边缘平齐。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188 MB/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
187 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
184 MB/s ∼98% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
  (AV Pro 60)
161.1 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
154 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Average of class Workstation
  (26.5 - 220, n=31, last 2 years)
140 MB/s ∼74% -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
244.1 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
206.3 MB/s ∼85% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
205 MB/s ∼84%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
189.8 MB/s ∼78% -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
  (AV Pro 60)
172.7 MB/s ∼71% -16%
Average of class Workstation
  (31.6 - 244, n=29, last 2 years)
162 MB/s ∼66% -21%

沟通

联想ThinkPad P17 G2。键盘下方的WWAN插槽未被占用
联想ThinkPad P17 G2。键盘下方的WWAN插槽未被占用

除了前面提到的RJ45以太网连接外,联想ThinkPad P17 G2当然也配备了Wi-Fi支持。通过全新的Wi-Fi 6E模块AX210,制造商在这里也依靠英特尔。稍微令人失望的是。虽然接收数据时的传输速度还不错,但传输速度却没有达到我们的预期。

我们的测试设备包括联想ThinkPad P17第二代可选的WWAN/LTE模块的必要内部设备。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1427 (1103min - 1464max) MBit/s ∼100% +86%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1346 (644min - 1421max) MBit/s ∼94% +75%
Average of class Workstation
  (592 - 1642, n=37, last 2 years)
1188 MBit/s ∼83% +55%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (675 - 1602, n=20)
1163 MBit/s ∼81% +52%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
941 (763min - 1176max) MBit/s ∼66% +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
767 (421min - 954max) MBit/s ∼54%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
670 MBit/s ∼47% -13%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1525 (878min - 1777max) MBit/s ∼100% +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (636min - 1472max) MBit/s ∼92% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1391 (1094min - 1575max) MBit/s ∼91%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (914 - 1716, n=20)
1300 MBit/s ∼85% -7%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1286 (1229min - 1366max) MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (547 - 1557, n=37, last 2 years)
1277 MBit/s ∼84% -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
547 MBit/s ∼36% -61%
4215015816617418219019811061114112211301138114611541144114151220116514921575146714401557150813591481144814171446144114631462146914131389128512081094120613701396122314491414144114151220116514921575146714401557150813591481144814171446144114631462146914131389128512081094120613701396122314491414421872954913907943816894892772589717533537651738714678762718683786716775835826817668740711Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1390 (1094-1575)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø753 (421-954)

网络摄像头

联想终于开始在特定的ThinkPad型号中加入1080p网络摄像头。不幸的是,ThinkPad P17 G2并没有入选。因此,集成的720p在质量方面没有提供什么,只够用于视频通话。

ColorChecker
21.5 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
22 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G: 17.64 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 29.35 ∆E

安全问题

无论你需要哪种安全功能,联想P17 G2都很有可能支持它。智能卡读卡器、指纹传感器和红外摄像头保证了认证的安全性。同时,有一个 "ThinkShutter "网络摄像头快门,可以更好地保护隐私,还有一个Kensington锁可以防止被盗。如果ThinkPad丢失,可以在BIOS的computrace功能帮助下找到它。

维护

许多可升级的部件,可能难以调换--这对大多数老式的P系列ThinkPad来说都是如此。例如,为了清洁ThinkPad P73的风扇,整个机箱包括镁质框架都必须被拆开。在新的ThinkPad P17上,这种情况不再存在。拆下底板就可以接触到电池和冷却解决方案。底板上有14颗螺丝,其中两颗隐藏在小的维护舱口下面。卸下螺丝后,底板仅由塑料夹子固定。

在小型服务舱门下面有两个SODIMM和两个未被占用的M.2插槽。主固态硬盘、另外两个SODIMM插槽和M.2-2242 WWAN插槽位于键盘下方,键盘也可以相当容易地被拆除。它只由底部的两个螺丝固定。与所有ThinkPad笔记本电脑一样,联想提供了一份hardware维护手册。.

ThinkPad P17 G2: 底板已拆下
ThinkPad P17 G2: 底板已拆下
ThinkPad P17 G2。GFRP底板
ThinkPad P17 G2。GFRP底板
ThinkPad P17 G2。拆除键盘
ThinkPad P17 G2。拆除键盘
ThinkPad P17 G2。维护舱口下方未被占用的SSD插槽
ThinkPad P17 G2。维护舱口下方未被占用的SSD插槽

输入设备。ThinkPad P17 G2现在有了一个点击板

键盘

键盘方面没有任何变化,自ThinkPad P72以来,大部分都没有变化。平滑的按键带有两个亮度级别的背光,并有1.8毫米的行程,这比其他现代笔记本电脑明显多。长行程还是短行程更好,这是一个习惯和个人偏好的问题。在任何情况下,所安装的键盘都非常出色,无愧于ThinkPad的名字,反馈效果非常理想,既不会太软也不会太硬。联想Thinkpad P17第二代很适合甚至长时间的打字。与之不同的是 ThinkPad P15 G2键盘区域不会屈服。

与大多数大型工作站一样,在键盘区的右侧有一个小键盘,导致主键稍微向左偏移。键盘并没有完全伸展到底座的整个宽度上。此外,所有重要的功能都有专门的按键,包括导航,这使得工作流程更加高效。

联想ThinkPad P17 G2。键盘区
联想ThinkPad P17 G2。键盘区

触摸板和TrackPoint

通过ThinkPad P17,联想将其没有专用按键的点击板引入了另一个产品系列。然而,联想抓住了这个机会,改用玻璃触摸板。塑料表面提供了平滑的滑行性能,并有沉闷的高质量点击。在10 x 7厘米(约3.94 x 2.76英寸)处,触摸板大小适中。Synaptics触摸板的软件实现不值得批评。

除了触摸板,联想ThinkPad P17 G2还提供了标志性的ThinkPad TrackPoint及其三个专用按钮。TrackPoint优于触摸板,特别是在拖放方面,它允许用户在打字时移动鼠标指针。总的来说,它是一个很好的鼠标替代品,尽管对初学者来说可能需要一些练习。

联想ThinkPad P17 G2。触摸板
联想ThinkPad P17 G2。触摸板
联想ThinkPad P17 G2。追踪点
联想ThinkPad P17 G2。追踪点

显示屏。ThinkPad采用令人失望的全高清液晶屏

联想ThinkPad P17 G2亚像素阵列
联想ThinkPad P17 G2亚像素阵列
几乎没有任何背光渗漏(在这张图中被夸大了)。
几乎没有任何背光渗漏(在这张图中被夸大了)。

虽然16:9的形式因素还没有完全过时,但它现在几乎已经过时了。越来越多的笔记本电脑正在采用16:10或3:2的长宽比,尽管这一趋势似乎还没有对工作站领域产生多大影响。联想为ThinkPad P17第二代提供了两种17.3英寸16:9的显示屏选择,两种变体都是哑光IPS屏幕。触摸屏在这一型号上是不存在的,因为它们--连同OLED--都是较小的型号所独有的。 联想ThinkPad P15 G2.

  • 全高清(1920 x 1080),300尼特,100 % sRGB
  • 4K超高清(3840 x 2160),500尼特,100 % AdobeRGB

该显示器毫不费力地超过了宣传的300尼特的亮度水平,其平均测量亮度为334尼特。虽然它比去年的型号更亮,但ThinkPad P17 G2的基本显示选项不能完全与竞争的惠普和戴尔系统的4K UHD液晶显示器竞争。

总的来说,原生全高清分辨率对于17英寸笔记本电脑来说几乎太低了,尤其是在工作站领域。图像看起来有些粗糙,大型液晶屏感觉被浪费了。我们希望联想能在未来的机型中切换到2K或QHD显示屏。

340
cd/m²
349
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
329
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
314
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
315
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LP173WF4-SPF7
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 361 cd/m² Average: 334 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 357 cd/m²
Contrast: 1031:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 3.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
N173HCE-E31, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
AUOCD8C, , 3840x2160, 17.30
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 17.00
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
170PUW1-A00, IPS, 1920x1200, 17.00
Display
4%
32%
30%
30%
Display P3 Coverage
67.9
67.53
-1%
99.28
46%
83.63
23%
96.24
42%
sRGB Coverage
87.3
94.15
8%
99.94
14%
99.71
14%
99.84
14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
63.9
67.79
6%
86.87
36%
97.71
53%
84.69
33%
Response Times
-14%
-61%
-29%
-19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
39.2 (21.2, 18)
40 (20.4, 19.6)
-2%
56 (26, 30)
-43%
41.2 (18.4, 22.8)
-5%
41.2 (22, 19.2)
-5%
Response Time Black / White *
22.4 (11.6, 10.8)
28 (17.2, 10.8)
-25%
40 (22, 18)
-79%
34 (20, 14)
-52%
29.6 (16.4, 13.2)
-32%
PWM Frequency
25000 (50)
Screen
6%
48%
16%
31%
Brightness middle
361
333
-8%
573
59%
483.8
34%
323
-11%
Brightness
334
310
-7%
586
75%
457
37%
308
-8%
Brightness Distribution
87
83
-5%
91
5%
90
3%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.35
0.39
-11%
0.38
-9%
0.37
-6%
0.36
-3%
Contrast
1031
854
-17%
1508
46%
1308
27%
897
-13%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
5.4
4.4
19%
1.9
65%
4.27
21%
1.1
80%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.9
7.5
24%
4.2
58%
8.78
11%
3.3
67%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
3.2
2
37%
0.7
78%
4.01
-25%
0.8
75%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
6.5
5.1
22%
2.9
55%
3.5
46%
0.8
88%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.39 92%
2.1 105%
2.43 91%
2.23 99%
CCT
7351 88%
7061 92%
6217 105%
1741 373%
6479 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
61.1
77.6
86.7
75.7
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
94
100
99.9
99.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / 3%
6% / 29%
6% / 13%
14% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

颜色
颜色
灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色(已校准
颜色(已校准
灰度(已校准)
灰度(已校准)
饱和度(已校准
饱和度(已校准

根据我们的X-Rite i1Pro 2色度计的CalMAN结果,LCD的色温在出厂时略微过冷。用X-Rite的iProfiler进行校准,大大改善了灰度,而颜色仍然不准确。即使有1031:1的对比度,也不能否认显示器的色彩准确性差。联想ThinkPad P17 G2的全高清显示屏并没有达到宣传的100%sRGB覆盖率。虽然87%并不是一个可怕的结果,但它绝对低于平均水平。对于专业的照片编辑,UHD液晶显示器应该是一个更好的选择。

DCI P3: 67.9 %
DCI P3: 67.9 %
AdobeRGB: 63.9 %
AdobeRGB: 63.9 %
sRGB: 87.3 %
sRGB: 87.3 %
室外(天气晴朗,阴凉处)。
室外(天气晴朗,阴凉处)。

户外使用主要是通过屏幕的哑光层实现的。300尼特的亮度至少可以满足在阴凉处使用。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21.2 ms rise
↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

由于采用了基本的IPS技术,ThinkPad显示屏提供了很好的可视角度。

性能。联想ThinkPad P17 G2的得分很高

随着ThinkPad P17的推出,P系列变得比以往任何时候都更具可配置性,因为GPU占据了一个独立的子板。这允许任意的处理器和图形组合。可用的处理器如下。 酷睿i5-11500H, i7-11800H, i7-11850H, i9-11950H, Xeon W-11855M,以及 Xeon W-11955M.联想将这些CPU与 Nvidia T1200(60 W), Nvidia RTX A2000(60 W), RTX A3000(115 W),RTX A4000(115 W)RTX A5000(115 W)

四个SODIMM插槽总共支持128GB的DDR4-3200内存,在配置至强选项时具有ECC功能。此外,联想ThinkPad P17第二代最多可以接受三块M.2-2280固态硬盘。

HWiNFO
HWiNFO
GPU-Z 英特尔
GPU-Z 英特尔
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z内存
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z SPD
CPU-Z SPD

处理器

英特尔酷睿i7-11800H是英特尔第11代Tiger Lake 的H系列处理器,意味着10纳米的CPU终于被引入到ThinkPad P系列。H系列八核CPU的TDP为45W,时钟速度最高为4.6GHz。基本时钟位于2.3GHz。与其他处理器的比较可以在我们的 CPU比较页面.

联想ThinkPad P17 G2的最大功率限制被设定为出厂时的80瓦。在长时间的负载下,消耗量下降到70瓦,这仍然大大高于指定的TDP。高功率预算使我们的ThinkPad笔记本电脑在多线程性能方面轻松地超过了每一个采用老式英特尔CPU的竞争对手。同时,它的性能与 联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH差不多,后者配备的是AMD Cezanne-H CPU RyzenR7 5800H它需要更少的功率来达到相同的性能水平。

在电池模式下,CPU性能下降了约12%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

1067.41177.41287.41397.41507.41617.41727.41837.41947.42057.42144.432100.622079.332063.342053.922035.622024.912035.832020.712016.842012.782002.92010.661997.31994.711983.041980.21973.751987.5820011977.951994.712000.22002.91959.15122911301167115711611156115711561159116711641163115911601162115511491165116111551163116211551161116411581160115711611154115911591158116311581143116011631157115511581162114511581160115511511162115811581516.821511.771499.761457.141429.341450.911444.721443.051448.231447.491461.351457.511462.581446.241447.391439.781440.821463.431455.661450.381435.61446.181441.911455.231451.011794.371674.691671.41674.691677.991638.271624.761622.721629.061647.791626.811633.051635.121642.441648.81645.681628.861658.441630.921649.891640.351634.051650.911637.21628.931630.921642.441635.121643.521654.261638.271653.11653.11646.71653.11655.221652.011640.351649.821622.651629.931652.011635.121628.861644.531637.41648.81627.871652.011639.341264.381228.691154.471132.021123.561106.071102.751089.151084.11081.781083.161076.81067.381081.341081.341101.351090.541095.681085.011096.611084.571091.491095.231096.161095.681249.061229.912051188.211178.381175.121163.911164.4511551150.321135.521128.511138.561129.021148.771150.811154.971152.91144.661153.971159.191160.731147.221156.541141.591971.511952.461943.541937.141946.571952.461951.891953.321962.031956.951931.91954.271941.561961.461959.731942.61942.411929.761938.641936.761930.871930.61923.821930.61941.65Tooltip
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2018 (1959.15-2144.43)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø1159 (1130-1229)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1456 (1429.34-1516.82)
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1646 (1622.65-1794.37)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H; Auto: Ø1108 (1067.38-1264.38)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H; Turbo: Ø1162 (1128.51-1249.06)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1945 (1923.82-1971.51)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=24)
573 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
542 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (436 - 618, n=38, last 2 years)
505 Points ∼87% -13%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
492 Points ∼85% -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
489 Points ∼84% -16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
460 Points ∼79% -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
454 Points ∼78% -22%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
5180 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=27)
4590 Points ∼89% -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4575 Points ∼88% -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
4065 Points ∼78% -22%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
3639 Points ∼70% -30%
Average of class Workstation
  (1602 - 5180, n=39, last 2 years)
3032 Points ∼59% -41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
2809 Points ∼54% -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
2428 Points ∼47% -53%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
1508 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=23)
1489 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1386 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (1162 - 1596, n=18, last 2 years)
1373 Points ∼91% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1284 Points ∼85% -15%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
12876 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=25)
11861 Points ∼92% -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11727 Points ∼91% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
8802 (8415.48min - 8801.64max) Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Workstation
  (4239 - 12876, n=18, last 2 years)
8688 Points ∼67% -33%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
231 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 231, n=23)
225 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
224 Points ∼97% -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
211 Points ∼91% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
211 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (178 - 241, n=42, last 2 years)
204 Points ∼88% -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
192 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
192 Points ∼83% -17%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
2144 (1959.15min - 2144.43max) Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1972 (1923.82min - 1971.51max) Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=26)
1936 Points ∼90% -10%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1666 (1622.65min - 1794.37max) Points ∼78% -22%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1517 (1429.34min - 1516.82max) Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Workstation
  (675 - 2144, n=43, last 2 years)
1321 Points ∼62% -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1272 (1143min - 1229max) Points ∼59% -41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1264 Points ∼59% -41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1249 Points ∼58% -42%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
411 Seconds * ∼100% -64%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
409 Seconds * ∼100% -64%
Average of class Workstation
  (250 - 703, n=35, last 2 years)
405 Seconds * ∼99% -62%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
302 Seconds * ∼73% -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
286 Seconds * ∼70% -14%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=23)
268 Seconds * ∼65% -7%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
260 Seconds * ∼63% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
250 Seconds * ∼61%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
5589 MIPS ∼100% +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
5507 MIPS ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=23)
5481 MIPS ∼98% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
5444 MIPS ∼97%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5292 MIPS ∼95% -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (4417 - 5773, n=36, last 2 years)
5257 MIPS ∼94% -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5020 MIPS ∼90% -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
4886 MIPS ∼87% -10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
52444 MIPS ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
49079 MIPS ∼94%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (37641 - 56758, n=23)
49030 MIPS ∼93% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
45696 MIPS ∼87% -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
41823 MIPS ∼80% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (19147 - 50060, n=36, last 2 years)
36178 MIPS ∼69% -26%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
31696 MIPS ∼60% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
31087 MIPS ∼59% -37%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
1557 Points ∼100%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1431 Points ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=20)
1390 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (1124 - 1702, n=32, last 2 years)
1353 Points ∼87% -13%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
1347 Points ∼87% -13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1317 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
1222 Points ∼78% -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
1150 Points ∼74% -26%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
8491 Points ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
8147 Points ∼96%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7438 Points ∼88% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=20)
7360 Points ∼87% -10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
6529 Points ∼77% -20%
Average of class Workstation
  (3852 - 9100, n=32, last 2 years)
6486 Points ∼76% -20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
5310 Points ∼63% -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
5270 Points ∼62% -35%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.6 fps ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=23)
14.1 fps ∼97% -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.8 fps ∼95% -5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
13.6 fps ∼93% -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
11.3 fps ∼77% -23%
Average of class Workstation
  (5.24 - 14.6, n=35, last 2 years)
10.1 fps ∼69% -31%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H
9.1 fps ∼62% -38%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.54 fps ∼58% -42%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
64.7 s * ∼100% -28%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
54.8 s * ∼85% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (41.3 - 106, n=34, last 2 years)
53.6 s * ∼83% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
50.7 s * ∼78%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
47.4 s * ∼73% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 50.7, n=23)
46.1 s * ∼71% +9%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
44.4 s * ∼69% +12%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.633 sec * ∼100% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.543 - 0.695, n=33, last 2 years)
0.592 sec * ∼94% -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.571 sec * ∼90% -0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.569 sec * ∼90%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M
0.568 sec * ∼90% -0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=23)
0.567 sec * ∼90% -0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.544 sec * ∼86% +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
6839
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6833 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
177.13 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2144 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
283 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
231 Points
Help

系统性能

正如预期的那样,高端硬件在PCMark 10中的表现异常出色。同样,日常性能也感觉很快。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6430 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
 
6430 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
5768 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (4096 - 6939, n=38, last 2 years)
5549 Points ∼86% -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
5484 Points ∼85% -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5363 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4918 Points ∼76% -24%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
10351 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
10126 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
 
10126 Points ∼98% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
9917 Points ∼96% -2%
Average of class Workstation
  (8059 - 10829, n=38, last 2 years)
9506 Points ∼92% -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9214 Points ∼89% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8059 Points ∼78% -20%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
8369 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
 
8369 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
8269 Points ∼99% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (6426 - 9317, n=38, last 2 years)
7918 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7769 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
7641 Points ∼91% -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7110 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
8511 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
 
8511 Points ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7427 Points ∼87% -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
6876 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Workstation
  (3221 - 10441, n=38, last 2 years)
6334 Points ∼74% -26%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
5229 Points ∼61% -39%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4511 Points ∼53% -47%
PCMark 10 Score
6430 points
Help

DPC延迟

不幸的是,联想ThinkPad P17 Gen 2显然在DPC延迟问题上挣扎。这可能会导致实时音频和视频编辑过程中的中断。唯一的解决办法是联想的驱动程序更新。

延迟监测
延迟监测
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6610 μs * ∼100%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5161 μs * ∼78% +22%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

安装的512GB固态硬盘是由Kioxia制造的,以前被称为东芝内存。M.2-2280的Kioxia XG7固态硬盘比上一代的东芝XG6固态硬盘快。然而,这款NVMe PCIe 4.0固态硬盘不能完全匹配三星PM981。

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
Average Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
 
AS SSD
-16%
1%
-34%
14%
10%
Seq Read
3996.78
2693.38
-33%
2423.45
-39%
2025.39
-49%
2958
-26%
4551 (3997 - 5105, n=2)
14%
Seq Write
1048.54
1541.94
47%
1203.39
15%
1438.41
37%
2350
124%
1432 (1049 - 1815, n=2)
37%
4K Read
44.96
62.59
39%
42.24
-6%
38.77
-14%
56.57
26%
46.2 (45 - 47.5, n=2)
3%
4K Write
115.26
149.48
30%
115.54
0%
96.95
-16%
106.1
-8%
126 (115 - 137, n=2)
9%
4K-64 Read
2160.26
871.15
-60%
1630.35
-25%
1105.29
-49%
1836.32
-15%
2136 (2112 - 2160, n=2)
-1%
4K-64 Write
1697.44
1005.5
-41%
1978.9
17%
1435.35
-15%
1788.53
5%
1700 (1697 - 1702, n=2)
0%
Access Time Read *
0.156
0.058
63%
0.057
63%
0.08
49%
0.061
61%
0.1105 (0.065 - 0.156, n=2)
29%
Access Time Write *
0.036
0.067
-86%
0.033
8%
0.116
-222%
0.036
-0%
0.033 (0.03 - 0.036, n=2)
8%
Score Read
2605
1203
-54%
1915
-26%
1347
-48%
2189
-16%
2638 (2605 - 2670, n=2)
1%
Score Write
1918
1309
-32%
2215
15%
1676
-13%
2130
11%
1970 (1918 - 2021, n=2)
3%
Score Total
5700
3088
-46%
5047
-11%
3686
-35%
5411
-5%
5793 (5700 - 5885, n=2)
2%

* ... smaller is better

Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
Sequential Read: 3996.78MB/s
Sequential Write: 1048.54MB/s
4K Read: 44.96MB/s
4K Write: 115.26MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2160.26MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1697.44MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.156ms
Access Time Write: 0.036ms
Score Read: 2605Points
Score Write: 1918Points
Score Total: 5700Points

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

3775.53980.53775.54016.884018.914018.984020.664022.554023.184023.184023.944024.854025.44025.44025.44025.484025.614025.694026.954027.794028.334028.334028.724029.264029.684029.894030.14030.224030.314030.314030.634030.944031.054031.364031.574031.894031.984032.14033.454034.084034.54034.64034.924034.924034.924035.554036.64036.914036.914041.634042.354042.56Tooltip
: Ø4025 (3775.5-4042.56)

GPU性能

GPU-Z Nvidia RTX A2000
GPU-Z Nvidia RTX A2000

Nvidia RTX A2000是新的专业Nvidia GPU阵容的一部分,不再使用 "Quadro "名称。它基于Nvidia最新的安培架构,提供2560条流水线。与其他图形芯片的比较可以在我们专门的 GPU比较页面.

联想ThinkPad P17 G2的GPU可以通过128位总线访问4GB的专用GDDR6内存。联想笔记本电脑内的60瓦版本达到了一个可敬的性能水平,类似于 RTX 3000 Max-Q中的 戴尔Precision 5750中的RTX 3000 Max-Q,而比RTX 4000 Max-Q慢约20%。 RTX 4000 Max-Q中的 ZBook Fury 17这取决于基准测试。

在电池模式下,其性能受到严重限制。当没有连接到交流适配器时,GPU的性能下降了近40%。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
23684 Points ∼100% +22%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
19513 Points ∼82% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19437 Points ∼82%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (16236 - 19437, n=2)
17837 Points ∼75% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (4110 - 32999, n=41, last 2 years)
17686 Points ∼75% -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
17569 Points ∼74% -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
17074 Points ∼72% -12%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
17049 Points ∼100% +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14627 Points ∼86%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
14328 Points ∼84% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
13802 Points ∼81% -6%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (11970 - 14627, n=2)
13299 Points ∼78% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (3169 - 24354, n=40, last 2 years)
13286 Points ∼78% -9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
13196 Points ∼77% -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
6764 Points ∼100% +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5590 Points ∼83%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
5503 Points ∼81% -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
5405 Points ∼80% -3%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (4616 - 5590, n=2)
5103 Points ∼75% -9%
Average of class Workstation
  (988 - 9956, n=41, last 2 years)
5011 Points ∼74% -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
4943 Points ∼73% -12%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (139 - 141, n=2)
140 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
138.98 fps ∼99%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
123.7 fps ∼88% -11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
112.06 fps ∼80% -19%
Average of class Workstation
  (57.3 - 204, n=38, last 2 years)
111 fps ∼79% -20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
110.83 fps ∼79% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
109.62 fps ∼78% -21%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
225.45 fps ∼100% +22%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
202.06 fps ∼90% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
185.47 fps ∼82%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (176 - 185, n=2)
181 fps ∼80% -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
179.45 fps ∼80% -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.9 - 465, n=38, last 2 years)
175 fps ∼78% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.56 fps ∼71% -13%
Showcase (showcase-02)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
89.26 fps ∼100% +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
73.33 fps ∼82% +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
72.85 fps ∼82% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
69.51 fps ∼78%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
67.84 fps ∼76% -2%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (63 - 69.5, n=2)
66.3 fps ∼74% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (13.7 - 127, n=37, last 2 years)
64.1 fps ∼72% -8%
Medical (medical-02)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
81.87 fps ∼100% +12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
73.94 fps ∼90% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
72.91 fps ∼89%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (66.6 - 72.9, n=2)
69.7 fps ∼85% -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
67.11 fps ∼82% -8%
Average of class Workstation
  (15.8 - 133, n=38, last 2 years)
61.1 fps ∼75% -16%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
53.87 fps ∼66% -26%
Maya (maya-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
172.04 fps ∼100%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
168.84 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (162 - 172, n=2)
167 fps ∼97% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162 fps ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
155.35 fps ∼90% -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
146.36 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Workstation
  (40.3 - 341, n=38, last 2 years)
145 fps ∼84% -16%
Energy (energy-02)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.33 fps ∼100% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.98 fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (29.1 - 34, n=2)
31.5 fps ∼89% -7%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
28.6 fps ∼81% -16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
25.94 fps ∼73% -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
25.76 fps ∼73% -24%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 57.3, n=38, last 2 years)
24.6 fps ∼70% -28%
Creo (creo-02)
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
180.92 fps ∼100% +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
170.18 fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (161 - 170, n=2)
166 fps ∼92% -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162.13 fps ∼90% -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
160.6 fps ∼89% -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
151.8 fps ∼84% -11%
Average of class Workstation
  (35.3 - 320, n=38, last 2 years)
146 fps ∼81% -14%
Catia (catia-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
210.82 fps ∼100%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
198.56 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (186 - 211, n=2)
198 fps ∼94% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
185.84 fps ∼88% -12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
181.55 fps ∼86% -14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
166.87 fps ∼79% -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (47.5 - 339, n=38, last 2 years)
160 fps ∼76% -24%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H
149.42 fps ∼100% +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137.92 fps ∼92%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M
136.23 fps ∼91% -1%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (135 - 138, n=2)
136 fps ∼91% -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
129.46 fps ∼87% -6%
Average of class Workstation
  (25.3 - 232, n=38, last 2 years)
121 fps ∼81% -12%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
120.32 fps ∼81% -13%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
126.44 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (114 - 126, n=2)
120 fps ∼95% -5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
114.41 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (23.2 - 176, n=17, last 2 years)
79.2 fps ∼63% -37%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
185.98 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (175 - 186, n=2)
181 fps ∼97% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
180.96 fps ∼97% -3%
Average of class Workstation
  (19.5 - 285, n=17, last 2 years)
123 fps ∼66% -34%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
38.33 fps ∼100% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34.49 fps ∼90%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (34 - 34.5, n=2)
34.2 fps ∼89% -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (7.5 - 56.9, n=17, last 2 years)
22.7 fps ∼59% -34%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (191 - 197, n=2)
194 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
191.48 fps ∼99%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
159.89 fps ∼82% -16%
Average of class Workstation
  (46.8 - 258, n=17, last 2 years)
127 fps ∼65% -34%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.71 fps ∼100% +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.85 fps ∼95%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (29.4 - 33.9, n=2)
31.6 fps ∼88% -7%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.77 - 55.1, n=17, last 2 years)
19.2 fps ∼54% -43%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
98.25 fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (91.5 - 98.3, n=2)
94.9 fps ∼97% -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
88.29 fps ∼90% -10%
Average of class Workstation
  (23 - 136, n=17, last 2 years)
64.6 fps ∼66% -34%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
60.47 fps ∼100% +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.65 fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (53.5 - 59.7, n=2)
56.6 fps ∼94% -5%
Average of class Workstation
  (10.6 - 93.6, n=17, last 2 years)
38.1 fps ∼63% -36%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
64.09 fps ∼100% +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.66 fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (59.6 - 59.7, n=2)
59.6 fps ∼93% 0%
Average of class Workstation
  (11.6 - 120, n=17, last 2 years)
45.3 fps ∼71% -24%
3DMark 06 Standard
36019 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
63738 points
3DMark 11 Performance
18193 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
94347 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
42670 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13170 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5904 points
Help

游戏性能

联想ThinkPad P17 G2绝对不是为游戏而生,但游戏开发可能有意义。RTX A2000装备精良,可以处理现代游戏,尽管在最高设置下,在最新的游戏中实现稳定的60 FPS并不总是可能。对于4K游戏,建议使用更强大的联想ThinkPad P17 G2版本。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
115 fps ∼100% +20%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F
Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
107.4 (101min - 116max) fps ∼93% +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE
Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
101.3 fps ∼88% +6%
Average of class Workstation
  (18.7 - 199, n=33, last 2 years)
98.5 fps ∼86% +3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
95.9 fps ∼83% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
95.8 (79min - 111max) fps ∼83%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
  (92.4 - 95.8, n=2)
94.1 fps ∼82% -2%

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

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
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU: Ø51.3 (49-54)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 173 164 119 69.1 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 256 160 95.8 54 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 156 133 129 121 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 131 76.3 51.6 fps
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 115 97.9 78.5 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 290 135 110 95.7 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 111 70.4 67.3 61.6 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 169 81.2 68.6 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 207 110 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 143 125 85.1 63.9 fps
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) 109 77.9 70.1 54.8 fps
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 118 68.6 63.7 fps
Outriders (2021) 127 86.9 56 fps
Days Gone (2021) 123 85.5 76.6 57.7 fps
F1 2021 (2021) 205 137 109 50.6 fps
Deathloop (2021) 104 64.3 50.8 42.3 fps
New World (2021) 83.2 68.6 63.5 52.4 fps

排放。比ThinkPad P15 G2更少的热量和噪音

系统噪音

在空闲时,联想ThinkPad P17 G2的两个风扇都保持沉默。在我们的中值负载测试中,我们测得的最大噪音水平为38.1 dB(A),这已经相当明显了。在最大负荷下,风扇的速度进一步提高,在45 dB(A)时,接近可以承受的极限。至少,P17不会像其较小的兄弟姐妹那样吵闹,即 ThinkPad P15 G2它可以达到震耳欲聋的54.9分贝(A)。

我们没有注意到ThinkPad P17 G2的测试装置有任何线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
26.4 / 26.4 / 26.4 dB(A)
Load
38.1 / 45 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202726.927.526.33128.7252824.729.73025.829.8312827.332.132.127.8374034.137.333.93734.537.95035.23534.535.133.535.86330.530.934.430.530.331.88032.232.834.133.133.933.31002827.725.925.223.926.212529.729.226.726.225.42516028.12726.525.72422.920029.927.825.923.222.922.625031.428.226.72421.821.431531.929.22620.618.718.340031.931.527.120.517.317.450031.130.126.620.416.616.363030.729.425.319.415.115.980030.829.926.218.914.815.4100031.330261914.114125032.331.527.518.513.112.716003331.526.717.112.912.5200034.232.626.71912.613.2250034.633.327.221.612.813.73150