判决
是否考虑惠普 OmniBook 3 主要取决于你是将其视为纯粹的办公笔记本电脑还是多媒体笔记本电脑。
这款 17 英寸笔记本电脑的价格适中,如果不考虑输入设备的不稳定性,绝对有资格被归入第一类。
不过,我们很难推荐 OmniBook 3 作为多媒体笔记本电脑,因为它有太多的弱点和值得批评的地方,无论是升级选项有限(RAM 焊接,只有一个 M.2 插槽)这样的小问题,还是性能一般这样的大问题。
特别是 AMD Ryzen 5 40 APU(我们将在本文后面详细介绍),与当前的处理器相比毫无优势可言。再加上固态硬盘性能不佳,系统运行速度往往会相应减慢。
这意味着在我们眼中,OmniBook 3 这个名字并不名副其实,因为在 iGPU 的作用下,即使是较老的游戏通常也会变得帧数生涩。
事实上,OmniBook 3 的性能之所以没有变得更糟,部分原因在于它的低功耗,尽管电池容量只有 41 瓦时,但运行时间却非常稳定。
Pros
Cons
为了比较惠普 OmnBook 3 17 的性能,我们使用了较旧的 宏碁 Aspire 3 A315与技术上非常相似的 Ryzen 5 7520U和目前的联想机型 IdeaPad Slim 5 16和 IdeaPad 5 15采用了 Ryzen AI 5 330和 Ryzen AI 5 430和 Ryzen AI 5 430。
此外,小兄弟 OmniBook 5 16配备了 英特尔酷睿至尊 7 255U也在列表中。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
底盘
虽然机身表面仅由塑料制成,但其友好、明亮的设计让人联想到金属,给人留下深刻印象。
遗憾的是,许多地方的稳定性还有待提高,盖子一般只能用双手打开。最大开启角度仅为 130°左右。
尽管如此,该产品的做工(读作 "材料过渡")还是值得称赞的。OmniBook 3 的重量约为 2 千克,对于 17 英寸笔记本电脑来说不算太重。
设备
惠普为 OmniBook 3 17 配备了两个 USB-A 3.0 端口和两个 USB-C 3.1 Gen2 端口,后者支持 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort-out。
此外,还有一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口和一个音频插座。不过,制造商取消了 RJ45 LAN 和读卡器。
联发科的 Wi-Fi 6 模块在当今的标准下显得有点慢,网络摄像头的图像尽管是全高清分辨率,却显得相当模糊和不清晰。
卸下 5 颗十字螺丝后即可进入内部,不过由于各种挂钩的存在,底部面板相当紧。
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6 MT7920 Wireless LAN Card (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6 MT7920 Wireless LAN Card (n=1) | |
| Average of class Office (484 - 981, n=2, last 2 years) | |
网络摄像头

维护
输入设备
显示屏
1,920 x 1,080 60 Hz 显示屏的亮度出乎意料地高于制造商的规格要求。我们测得的平均亮度为 374 cd/m²,而不是 300 cd/m²,这是一个非常有用的值。
由于采用了哑光表面,因此也不会出现恼人的反光。不过,由于 62% 的 sRGB 覆盖率较低,图像显得比较苍白,而且在交付状态下色彩也不是很准确。
不过,OmniBook 3 17 的对比度接近 1,700:1,还是比较合理的。16:9 屏幕的可视角度是 IPS 机型的典型水平,响应时间略低于平均水平。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 403 cd/m²
Contrast: 1679:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.91 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
calibrated: 3.31
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
42.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
61.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
41.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.336
CCT: 6667 K
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng CMN1781, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 60 Hz | Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z AUO B156HTN06.1, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Lenovo LEN160WUM, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 LEN153WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr BOE0C46, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -11% | -6% | -12% | -5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 41.3 | 36.6 -11% | 39.1 -5% | 36.5 -12% | 39.2 -5% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 61.6 | 55 -11% | 57.6 -6% | 54.8 -11% | 57.7 -6% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 42.8 | 37.8 -12% | 40.4 -6% | 37.7 -12% | 40.5 -5% |
| Response Times | 24% | 5% | 10% | -5% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 34.5 ? | 38.05 ? -10% | 31.9 ? 8% | 30.3 ? 12% | 32.5 ? 6% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 21 ? | 9.07 ? 57% | 20.6 ? 2% | 19.5 ? 7% | 24.2 ? -15% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -53% | -11% | 10% | -8% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 403 | 199 -51% | 349 -13% | 437.1 8% | 349.2 -13% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 374 | 190 -49% | 332 -11% | 420 12% | 326 -13% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 89 | 79 -11% | 91 2% | 90 1% | 86 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.24 | 0.31 -29% | 0.33 -38% | 0.24 -0% | 0.33 -38% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1679 | 642 -62% | 1058 -37% | 1821 8% | 1058 -37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.91 | 10.4 -112% | 5.57 -13% | 5.3 -8% | 5.87 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.65 | 21.6 -0% | 19.96 8% | 19.09 12% | 20.58 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.31 | 4.25 -28% | 4.52 -37% | 2.93 11% | 3.04 8% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 11 -139% | 2.7 41% | 2.3 50% | 2.6 43% |
| Gamma | 2.336 94% | 2.196 100% | 2.129 103% | 2.25 98% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6667 97% | 11602 56% | 6656 98% | 6921 94% | 6411 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-33% | -4% /
-8% | 3% /
6% | -6% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 9.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 17.9 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7822 (minimum: 1.31 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘并不算多,但在这个价位的机型中很常见。稍后我们将讨论 CPU 和 GPU 性能。
遗憾的是,预装的 Gaming Hub 没有提供不同的运行模式,无法根据自己的需求和喜好定制系统。
处理器
......(英文 AMD Ryzen 5 40听起来很现代,但从基准测试中可以看出,它最终只是采用过时 Zen 2 架构的 Ryzen 5 7520U。
这款四核 APU 最多可处理 8 个线程,与目前 AMD 的 Ryzen 5 330 和 Ryzen 5 430(也是 4C/8T)等产品相比,速度分别快了约 60% 和 70%。
这同样适用于 酷睿至尊 7 255U也是如此,其速度甚至快达 90%。
Cinebench R15 多核循环
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Office (2083 - 31245, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Office (8191 - 125394, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Office (433 - 5755, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Office (1378 - 18321, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Office (4601 - 66922, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Office (4854 - 155900, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Office (114.6 - 1366, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Office (1109 - 17834, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Office (11090 - 65229, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z (v6.85.6300) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
因此,OmniBook 3 17 在系统基准测试中排名垫底也就不足为奇了。即使在日常使用中上网等,电脑有时在响应和加载时间方面也显得迟缓。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 -1! | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (2601 - 9298, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Office (3245 - 11594, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Office (5336 - 17243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 13541, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (381 - 2010, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (464 - 1880, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2361, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (360 - 1690, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (129.9 - 455, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Office (104.2 - 313, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40, AMD Radeon 610M (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1297, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 4140 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Office (20075 - 110930, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 128030, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 119858, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 40 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=72, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Average of class Office (365 - 98089, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
* ... smaller is better
存储性能
在存储子系统方面也有改进的余地。从表中可以清楚地看到,Western Digital 内置的 M.2 硬盘是速度较慢的固态硬盘之一。
至少在磁盘循环测试中没有出现速度下降的情况,而速度较快的型号通常会出现这种情况。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 610M Radeon 610MRyzen 5 40 中集成的 Radeon 610M 在 2026 年只会让人露出疲惫的笑容。而 Radeon 820M在 3DMarks 中几乎快了 80%,而 Radeon 840M则提高了 170%。
英特尔 图形 4 核甚至可以领先 200% 以上。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 13468 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2795 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 72987 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 10775 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1544 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 565 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 -1! | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z -2! | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Office (3.1 - 61.5, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Office (3.5 - 65.2, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Office (5.77 - 45.3, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr | |
| Average of class Office (14.6 - 135, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z | |
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超帧频图
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 61.3 | 51.9 | 11.4 | 5.77 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 77.5 | 57.4 | 26.8 | 24.4 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.3 | 16.5 | 14.4 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 7.3 | 5.6 | 4 | 3.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 7.5 | 5.2 | 4.1 | 3.1 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 13 | 9 | ||
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | ||
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 4.2 | 3.1 | ||
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 10.6 | 6.4 | ||
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 11 | 10 | ||
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 5.9 | 3.4 | ||
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 3.6 | 3.1 | ||
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 3.7 | 2.2 | ||
| Pragmata (2026) | 6.5 | 4.5 |
排放量
噪音排放
由于采用了经济实惠的组件,排放物被控制在一定范围内。在空闲模式下,OmniBook 3 17 的噪音通常低于 30 dB(A),而在负载情况下,风扇噪音水平保持在 32 到 38 dB(A)之间,这是可以接受的。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 32 / 38 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng R5 40, Radeon 610M | Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z R5 7520U, Radeon 610M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 430, Radeon 840M | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -6% | 2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 21.05 12% | 24 -0% | 23.1 4% | 23.3 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 26 -4% | 24 4% | 23.1 8% | 23.5 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27 | 26 4% | 25 7% | 23.1 14% | 23.5 13% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 29 | 26 10% | 26 10% | 23.8 18% | 24.4 16% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 32 | 36.22 -13% | 43 -34% | 32.8 -2% | 25.8 19% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 36 | 42 -17% | 42.3 -17% | 26.2 27% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 38 | 35.67 6% | 43 -13% | 42.3 -11% | 39 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 36.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机身表面的最高温度为 49 °C,其中机身底部的温度最高,而机身顶部的温度仅为 39 °C。掌托始终保持凉爽宜人。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng R5 40, Radeon 610M | Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z R5 7520U, Radeon 610M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 430, Radeon 840M | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -26% | 5% | -7% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 39 | 44.4 -14% | 35 10% | 41.6 -7% | 28 28% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 49 | 63.6 -30% | 37 24% | 43.2 12% | 33.2 32% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24 | 30.8 -28% | 26 -8% | 27.2 -13% | 24.6 -3% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 25 | 33.2 -33% | 27 -8% | 30 -20% | 27.8 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
扬声器
除了低音略显单薄外,OmniBook 3 17 的音质与同类产品相比还算不错。
HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
Ryzen 5 40 APU 的性能相当经济,因此即使在负载情况下,所提供的 45 W 电源也足够使用。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng R5 40, Radeon 610M | Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z R5 7520U, Radeon 610M | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 430, Radeon 840M | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -53% | -72% | -69% | -68% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.5 | 3.33 5% | 5.2 -49% | 4.1 -17% | 4.8 -37% | 4.39 ? -25% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 3.8 | 5.74 -51% | 6 -58% | 8.6 -126% | 9.4 -147% | 7.38 ? -94% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 4.3 | 6.46 -50% | 7.7 -79% | 8.8 -105% | 9.7 -126% | 8.63 ? -101% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 25 | 29.1 -16% | 44 -76% | 52.6 -110% | 41.8 -67% | 42.6 ? -70% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 33 | 43 -30% | 50.1 -52% | 39.5 -20% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 27.5 | 40.4 -47% | 39.9 -45% | 35.9 -31% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 43 | 42.62 1% | 58 -35% | 65 -51% | 66.1 -54% | 64.2 ? -49% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 20.5 |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监控器的能耗
电池寿命
OmniBook 3 17 的运行时间为 10.5 小时,在亮度降至 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中表现相当出色,与 IdeaPad Slim 5 不相上下。
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng R5 40, Radeon 610M, 41 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z R5 7520U, Radeon 610M, 40 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 330, Radeon 820M, 60 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 430, Radeon 840M, 60 Wh | HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Ultra 7 255U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 59 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -8% | 0% | -32% | -10% | 23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 10.5 | 9.7 -8% | 10.5 0% | 7.1 -32% | 9.5 -10% | 12.9 ? 23% |
| H.264 (h) | 10 | 15 ? | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra (h) | 2.4 | |||||
| Load (h) | 1.8 | 1.807 ? |
Notebookcheck 对惠普 OmniBook 3 17 的总体印象
由于市场上已经出现了速度更快、配备更先进处理器且价格相当的笔记本电脑,因此,只要购买者了解自己的购买方式,惠普 OmniBook 3 17 就很难在这种形式的笔记本电脑市场上立足。
HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng
- 05/20/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP OmniBook 3 17-dp0451ng AMD Ryzen 5 40 ⎘ AMD Radeon 610M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 549 EUR | 2 kg | 16.4 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS | |
| Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R77Z AMD Ryzen 5 7520U ⎘ AMD Radeon 610M ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $335.99 acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R2SC ... 2. $43.81 TFTcenter Screen Replacement... 3. $319.99 Acer Aspire 3 A315-24P-R7VH ... | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI TN LED | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16AKP10 AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 ⎘ AMD Radeon 820M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 700 EUR | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 15AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 800 USD | 1.8 kg | 17.6 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS | |
| HP Omnibook 5 16-af1037nr Intel Core Ultra 7 255U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 660 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
























































