总结——Surface Laptop 13.8 是一款非常出色的日常用笔记本电脑
微软在两年间实际上并未做出任何实质性改变，只是为 Surface Laptop 13.8 搭载了全新的骁龙 X2 Plus 处理器，但额外的性能提升还是值得肯定的，整体配置依然出色。 与骁龙 X2 Elite 相比，性能差距微乎其微，除非你需要更大的内存或存储空间，否则升级的意义不大。你将获得高品质的金属机身、非常舒适的输入设备，以及亮度高且色彩准确的 IPS 屏幕。 没错，它采用镜面屏，画质确实不如 OLED 屏幕，但作为交换，它完全不存在 PWM 闪烁的问题。
此外，它还配备了出色的扬声器，风扇通常静音或非常安静，电池续航时间也有所提升。缺点包括内存采用焊接式设计，以及缺少读卡器。微软仍然使用专有的 Surface Connect 接口，但大多数用户可能更希望在右侧增加一个 USB-C 接口。
不过，我们对 Surface Laptop 有两大主要问题。首先是价格——搭载骁龙 X2 Plus 处理器、16 GB 内存和 512 GB SSD 的最低配机型售价高达 1599 美元，并不便宜。 更大的问题在于，微软强制要求个人用户购买骁龙版本。英特尔版本则搭载了最新的Core Ultra X处理器，包括Arc B390集成显卡，其图形和游戏性能要强得多。 我们相当确定，个人用户若能使用更快的 GPU 将获益更多，但这似乎与微软的 ARM 战略不符。企业用户还可以选择配备集成隐私滤镜的防眩光屏幕。不过，我们对隐私滤镜的使用体验并不理想，因此不确定这是否真的那么重要。
Pros
Cons
规格
机箱、连接性和输入设备
与上一代机型相比，微软并未改变机身设计，但现在为13.8英寸版本新增了一种配色：翡翠绿。 我们评测的这台机器采用了全新的绿色配色，我们非常喜欢，但您也可以选择铂金、沙丘色或黑色。金属机身依然拥有出色的做工，但重量略重，超过1.3公斤。铰链处仍有些许晃动，但并不太影响使用体验。 用户可以轻松打开机身进行内部维护，清洁风扇或更换紧凑型 M.2-2230 SSD。
接口配置依然不错，配备两个 USB-C 4.0 接口以及一个标准 USB-A 接口，右侧还设有微软专有的 Surface Connect 接口。 虽然附带了一些配件（如扩展坞），但我们更希望它能增加一个USB-C接口。不过，该机型并未配备HDMI接口或读卡器。Wi-Fi 7模块在搭配相应路由器时能实现极快的传输速率，在评测期间我们未发现信号质量方面的问题。 1080p网络摄像头（带红外功能）拍摄效果不错。我们依然非常喜欢它的输入设备。背光键盘打字体验极其舒适，触觉反馈触控板也表现出色。当然，你也可以使用电容式触摸屏进行操作。
| Networking | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
显示
虽然企业用户也可以选择配备防眩光屏幕（含集成隐私滤光片）的英特尔版本，但个人用户只能选择搭载熟悉的光面IPS触摸屏的ARM版本，该屏幕仍由夏普提供。 这款3:2比例的屏幕分辨率为2304 x 1536像素，刷新率达120 Hz，能提供出色的画质且无PWM闪烁现象，这使其在与OLED竞品相比时更具优势。不过响应时间相当慢，尽管在实际使用中这并不是什么大问题。
亮度超过600尼特，表现依然出色。这在一定程度上影响了黑电平值（0.44），因此最大对比度“仅”为1400:1，黑色内容看起来略显灰暗。 我们使用专业软件 CalMAN 进行的分析表明，预装的 sRGB 和 P3 色彩配置文件非常准确，进行图片编辑时无需额外校准。亮度和色温均可通过传感器自动调节。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 617 cd/m²
Contrast: 1402:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.9 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
96.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6810 K
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG ATNA33AA07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr LG Philips LGD0746, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.3", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA ATNA40CT06-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 1% | 6% | -18% | 2% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 96.5 | 97.8 1% | 98.1 2% | 99.9 4% | 66.5 -31% | 99.5 3% | 99.9 4% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 97.8 | 98.2 0% | 98.6 1% | 100 2% | 96.8 -1% | 98.8 1% | 100 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 86.5 | 87.3 1% | 86.8 0% | 95.7 11% | 67.3 -22% | 88.9 3% | 95.7 11% |
| Response Times | 3% | 29% | 94% | -39% | 95% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 38.8 ? | 38.9 ? -0% | 24.3 ? 37% | 1.8 ? 95% | 44.7 ? -15% | 1.22 ? 97% | 0.83 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 18.3 ? | 17.4 ? 5% | 14.7 ? 20% | 1.5 ? 92% | 29.7 ? -62% | 1.26 ? 93% | 0.69 ? 96% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 ? | 480 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 33 | 15 | 66 | ||||
| Screen | -6% | -37% | 679% | -122% | -22% | -43% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 617 | 606 -2% | 546 -12% | 394 -36% | 442 -28% | 404 -35% | 400 -35% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 623 | 592 -5% | 519 -17% | 395 -37% | 420 -33% | 408 -35% | 402 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 94 3% | 90 -1% | 98 8% | 88 -3% | 98 8% | 99 9% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.44 | 0.43 2% | 0.38 14% | 0.005 99% | 0.3 32% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 1402 | 1409 0% | 1437 2% | 78800 5521% | 1473 5% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.3 -44% | 2.1 -133% | 1.67 -86% | 4.34 -382% | 1.1 -22% | 2.1 -133% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 2.1 5% | 4 -82% | 3.9 -77% | 9.71 -341% | 3.3 -50% | 3.3 -50% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2 | 2.1 -5% | 3.3 -65% | 1.2 40% | 6.5 -225% | 1.9 5% | 2.3 -15% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.212 99% | 2.13 103% | 2.17 101% | 2.26 97% |
| CCT | 6810 95% | 6842 95% | 7127 91% | 6470 100% | 7466 87% | 6547 99% | 6795 96% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 0.58 | 1.6 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-3% | -2% /
-18% | 260% /
434% | -60% /
-85% | 25% /
6% | 20% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7763 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表现
测试条件
我们在“最佳性能”模式下进行了基准测试和测量。
处理器性能
基础款配备了全新的 骁龙 X2 Plus (X2P-64-100)，该芯片拥有10个核心（6个主核心运行频率为4.0 GHz，4个性能核心运行频率为3.4 GHz），最大功耗可达28瓦，最终稳定在18瓦（无论使用交流电还是电池供电）。其整体性能实际上非常接近 我们刚刚评测过的12核 ，我们刚刚在全新的 Surface Pro OLED 中评测的骁龙 X2 Elite（12 核）非常接近，而且 X2 Plus 的速度也略快于上一代 Surface Laptop 中使用的旧款 X1E-80-100。其整体性能水平非常出色，与英特尔在此 TDP 范围内的全新 Panther Lake 机型极为相似。
由于与性能稍弱的骁龙 X2 Elite 差距不大，因此只有当您需要超过 16 GB 内存和 512 GB SSD 存储空间时，才值得考虑更换机型。除了原生 CPU 基准测试（Cinebench 2024 和 Geekbench）外，我们还在下方列出了模拟基准测试结果。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1471, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 200, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (12923 - 14277, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 20325, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro 13 OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (2878 - 3265, n=2) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 4195, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
Cinebench R15 多循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2213, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 832, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6699, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (39.9 - 220, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4024 - 1.456, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG -2! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 -1! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 95002, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 96917, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 85600, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (756 - 5939, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
系统和存储设备
系统性能非常出色，Surface Laptop 的响应速度极快。自第一代骁龙处理器发布以来，应用兼容性已显著提升，但我们仍建议您在购买基于 ARM 架构的 Windows 设备前，先确认您常用的软件是否受支持。
微软在 Surface Laptop 中采用了紧凑型 M.2-2230 固态硬盘（PCIe 4.0），基础款配备 512 GB 硬盘（可用空间 421 GB），这款由 SK 海力士提供的硬盘传输速率良好且稳定。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1854, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 131023, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 135141, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.1 - 159.9, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
GPU 和游戏性能
骁龙 X2 Plus 搭载了 Adreno X2-45 GPU ，最高主频为1.7 GHz。这一点颇为耐人寻味，因为该GPU的性能不仅比旧款Adreno X1-45有了显著提升，实际上甚至与 Adreno X2-85 的性能相当接近，后者在新款Surface Pro OLED中的主频为1.35 GHz。它的速度还略高于 配备 4 个 Xe 核心的 Panther Lake 英特尔显卡。该设备同样支持游戏运行，且我们未遇到任何兼容性问题。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 23244 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 31418 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8099 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6284 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2538 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 622 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2935 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (76.3 - 227, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 861, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11.6 - 54.5, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
《赛博朋克2077》超高清帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 138.3 | 126.3 | 57.9 | 23 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.3 | 75.4 | 67.6 | 60.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 71.9 | 37.2 | 21.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 49.2 | 43 | 38.8 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 174.6 | 63.1 | 52.9 | 44 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 34.2 | 25 | 21.6 | 21.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 34.9 | 27.5 | 22.3 | 19.1 |
排放与能耗
系统噪声
Surface Laptop 是一款非常安静的设备，在轻度工作负载或短暂的峰值负载情况下，其单风扇通常处于关闭状态。进行游戏或 CPU 负载较高时，噪音会达到 37-42 dB(A)，虽然能听到，但不会太过分散注意力。 不过，考虑到较低的 TDP 值和机身高度，风扇噪音还是偏大的。另外两种电源模式在负载下要安静一些（平衡模式：38.6 dB(A)，最佳能效模式：36.2 dB(A)）。我们未察觉到其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.1 / 25.1 / 25.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.1 / 42.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.1 dB(A) | ||
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -8% | 10% | -12% | 0% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.8 5% | 25 -0% | 23.2 8% | 24.2 4% | 25.1 -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.8 5% | 26 -4% | 23.3 7% | 24.2 4% | 25.1 -0% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.8 5% | 27 -8% | 23.3 7% | 24.2 4% | 25.1 -0% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.1 | 23.8 5% | 28 -12% | 23.3 7% | 24.2 4% | 25.1 -0% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.1 | 26 -4% | 31 -24% | 24.7 2% | 41.3 -65% | 29.3 -17% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 37.4 | 31.5 16% | 41 -10% | 23.5 37% | 41.3 -10% | 33.1 11% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 42.4 | 40.3 5% | 42 1% | 42 1% | 51.7 -22% | 38.7 9% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度完全不成问题，只有在极端负载情况下或玩游戏时，温度才会超过40 °C。你仍然可以将其放在腿上使用，打字时也毫无限制。在压力测试中，SoC的功耗最高可达46瓦，但很快就会降至17-18瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.5 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-6.8 °C / -12.2 F).
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | 4% | 5% | 12% | 3% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 44.4 | 47.1 -6% | 44.1 1% | 42 5% | 35.8 19% | 40.9 8% | 41.4 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.5 | 44.6 -5% | 42.4 -0% | 41 4% | 37.6 12% | 47.2 -11% | 44.6 -5% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.9 | 24.7 5% | 23.7 8% | 24.2 7% | 24.5 5% | 24.9 4% | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26 | 24.5 6% | 23.8 8% | 24 8% | 24 8% | 25.5 2% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲嘉宾
音响系统没有变化，音质依然出色。
Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
功耗与电池续航时间
怠速油耗与 上一代产品 ，在压力测试中我们测得最高功耗可达61瓦，最终稳定在40瓦左右。因此，65瓦电源适配器已足够使用（欧盟版机型出厂时不附带电源适配器）。 电池续航时间仍有所提升，因为我们在 Wi-Fi 测试中测得亮度为 150 尼特时的续航时间接近 19 小时（比之前增加了约 4.5 小时），全亮度下则略超过 8.5 小时，因此甚至超越了 MacBook Air 13 M5。
| Off / Standby | 0.16 / 0.43 Watt |
| Idle | 1.7 / 6.8 / 7.5 Watt |
| Load |
28 / 61.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 Adreno X2-45, SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 8-Core GPU, M5 10-Core, Apple SSD AP0512Z | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Ultra 9 386H, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2-90, X2E-88-100, Micron 2600 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QHK | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | 12% | -17% | -30% | -49% | -14% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 1.7 | 1.4 18% | 1.8 -6% | 3.5 -106% | 3.2 -88% | 4.7 -176% | 3.7 -118% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.8 | 6.3 7% | 9.3 -37% | 4 41% | 6.8 -0% | 7.1 -4% | 5.2 24% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.5 | 7.6 -1% | 9.4 -25% | 6.4 15% | 7 7% | 7.4 1% | 5.4 28% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 28 | 26.9 4% | 29.4 -5% | 44 -57% | 50.3 -80% | 39.6 -41% | 26.2 6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 38.1 | 17.7 54% | 41.6 -9% | 31.4 18% | 42.7 -12% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 37.9 | 38.5 -2% | 18.9 50% | 41 -8% | 52.8 -39% | 65.3 -72% | 47.4 -25% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 61.3 | 40.7 34% | 30.4 50% | 54 12% | 59.9 2% | 101.8 -66% | 63.5 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗测试：《赛博朋克》/压力测试
外部显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
Notebookcheck 评分
Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8
- 07/08/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 88.4%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1699€ | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" 2304x1536 201 PPI IPS |
2. 86.2%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1649€ | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" 2304x1536 201 PPI IPS |
3. 91.6%  | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 8-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS |
4. 84%  | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1600 EUR | 888 g | 15.9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED |
5. 86.9%  | HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250 USD | 1 kg | 17.6 mm | 13.30" 1920x1200 170 PPI IPS |
6. 87.5%  | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,119.00 ASUS Zenbook A14 14" FHD+ OL... 2. $779.00 ASUS Zenbook A14; Copilot+ P... 3. $799.99 ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop 14" ... | 992 g | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
7. 86.9%  | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1699€ | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
