Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M2 Pro和M2 Max分析--GPU更高效,CPU不一定。

Apple 保持他们的5纳米芯片。

Apple 已经推出了他们的新SoC,M2 Pro和M2 Max。与M1相比,M2的效率略显不足,现在我们将把目光投向MacBook Pro型号中的两款新芯片:M2 Pro和M2 Max。
ARM Apple Benchmark MacBook Thunderbolt

就在半年多以前,Apple ,推出了他们新的M2片上系统(SoC),该系统正在被应用于MacBook Air,以及MacBook Pro 13以及Mac mini。就像其 前身一样M2芯片将使用5纳米工艺生产,该工艺得到了进一步改进。也做了一些其他的改变,如新的媒体引擎--但更高的核心时钟速度(P-Cores最高3.48对3.2GHz;E-Cores最高2.4对2.1GHz)是新芯片性能提高的原因。基本的结构和核心配置与一个性能集群(4个核心)和一个功率效率集群(4个核心)保持不变。我们的分析表明,Apple ,成功地提高了性能--但能耗也因此而增加。这意味着高负荷下的效率比M1更差。

我们已经在期待着新的 M2 ProM2 Max SoCs去年秋天,有传言说新的3纳米生产,这可能会提供更好的效率。然而,发布会被推迟到2023年1月,Apple ,坚持使用他们的5纳米芯片。除了更高的时钟速度外,处理器和显卡中还有更多的核心。我们已经能够测试 MacBook Pro 14 2023MacBook Pro 16 2023但现在我们想更仔细地看看新的SoC。它们肯定提供了更高的性能,但这是否像普通M2芯片那样对其效率造成了影响?

Apple M2 Pro和M2 Max概述

Apple 对其处理器阵容进行了瘦身,现在提供四种不同的SoC:两种M2 Pro芯片和两种M2 Max SoC。所有型号现在都有两个额外的功率效率核心,并保留六个或八个性能核心。另一个新功能是M2 Max中高达3.69 GHz的单核涡轮增压和M2 Pro中的3.504。在多核模式下,最高为3.264 GHz。此外,二级缓存已从28MB增加到36MB。

Apple M2 Pro (来源: )Apple
Apple M2 Pro (来源: )Apple
Apple M2 Max (来源: )Apple
Apple M2 Max (来源: )Apple

此外,这些显卡还受益于更多的核心数量以及更高的1.4GHz时钟速度。M2 Pro有16或19个GPU核心,M2 Max有32或38个核心。瘦身后的M2 Pro芯片只适用于较小的MacBook Pro 14的基本型号。Apple ,将最大内存量从64GB增加到96GB(LPDDR5-6400)--但只适用于M2 Max。M2 Pro被限制在32GB内存。

除了 b除了M2 Pro的bse型号之外,CPU的性能实际上是相同的--这一点我们在对MacBook Pro 14 2023和MacBook Pro 16 2023的评测中已经确定。除了M2 Pro的型号,CPU的性能几乎是相同的--我们在对MacBook Pro 14 2023和MacBook Pro 16 2023的评论中已经能够确定这一点。最大的区别在于图形性能。我们现在将检查新的Apple SoC的性能,并将它们与AMD、英特尔和Nvidia的处理器和显卡进行比较。

此外,我们还将分析效率--然而,Apple ,因为集成的PowerMetrics功能不再显示芯片的封装功率,这使得新的M2型号的分析变得有点困难(这也适用于Asitop或MX Power Gadget等工具)。相反,只显示CPU和GPU的真实消耗。因此,我们将在外部显示器上使用Cinebench R23基准来比较效率,这样就可以排除集成面板的影响因素。对于显卡,我们将在3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited基准测试中使用真实的GPU消耗量来比较Apple ,以及在游戏TheWitcher 3 中与Windows设备进行比较。稍后会有更多这方面的内容。

单核性能和效率

Apple 我们可以确定,与旧的M1 Pro和M1 Max CPU相比,它们的性能提高了6-8%。与旧的M1 Pro和M1 Max CPU相比,我们能够确定增强了6-8%的性能--但这完全可以归功于更高的时钟速度。与上一代相比,M2 Pro和M2 Max与普通M2处理器相比在以下方面显示出明显优势MacBook Pro 13MacBook Air.

Cinebench R23 - Single Core
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1647 Points +1%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
1643 Points +1%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
1625 Points
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
1581 Points -3%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
1580 Points -3%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
1536 Points -5%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
1534 Points -6%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
1531 Points -6%
Apple M1 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
1530 Points -6%
Geekbench 5.5 - Single-Core
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
1978 Points
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1961 Points -1%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
1937 Points -2%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
1926 Points -3%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
1925 Points -3%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
1795 Points -9%
Apple M1 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
1782 Points -10%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
1769 Points -11%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
1768 Points -11%
Cinebench R20 - CPU (Single Core)
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
460 Points
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
449 Points -2%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
447 Points -3%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
395 Points -14%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
393 Points -15%
Apple M1 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
390 Points -15%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
381 Points -17%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
380 Points -17%
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
239 Points
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
231 Points -3%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
230 Points -4%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
223 Points -7%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
223 Points -7%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
210 Points -12%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
209 Points -13%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
200 Points -16%
Apple M1 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
197 Points -18%

单核负载下的能耗略有上升,但这因芯片而异。例如,与旧的M1 Pro相比,两款M2 Pro的效率略高,而与旧的M1相比,M2 Max则落后。这里的差异可能看起来相当大,但你必须记住,我们谈论的是4-6瓦之间的范围,这在更大的计划中真的不算什么。

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
173.1 Points per Watt +141%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
161.7 Points per Watt +125%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
140.8 Points per Watt +96%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
118.2 Points per Watt +64%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
110.4 Points per Watt +54%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
81.3 Points per Watt +13%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
71.9 Points per Watt
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor)
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
22.6 (17.4min, 18.2P1 - 29.7max) Watt *
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
18.9 (16.7min, 17.9P1 - 19.9max) Watt * +16%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
13.9 (12.3min, 13.3P1 - 22.1max) Watt * +38%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
13.9 (12.2min, 12.7P1 - 16.5max) Watt * +38%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
11.7 (9.94min, 10.7P1 - 13.6max) Watt * +48%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
9.78 (9.13min, 9.21P1 - 11.2max) Watt * +57%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
9.13 (8.7min, 8.74P1 - 10.1max) Watt * +60%

* ... smaller is better

由于单核性能的提高,Apple ,几乎能够完全缩小与英特尔之间的差距,尽管这因测试的不同而不同。在Geekbench测试中,Apple SoC表现非常好,甚至击败了最新的 猛禽湖酷睿i7-1360P10%。然而,在Cinebench R23测试中,M2 Pro和M2 Max仍然与之前的Alder Lake CPU持平,而新的Raptor Lake i7则以15%的优势胜出--这得益于其更高的单核涡轮增压。Apple ,战胜了旧的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U带Zen 3+核心,尽管随着Zen 4型号的发布,这可能很快就会改变。

Performance Rating - Percent
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
95.2 pt
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
93.4 pt
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
93.3 pt
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
89.6 pt
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
88.5 pt
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
79.7 pt
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
78 pt
Cinebench R23 - Single Core
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
1877 Points +16%
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
1678 Points +3%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
1665 Points +2%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1647 Points +1%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
1625 Points
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
1518 Points -7%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
1493 Points -8%
Geekbench 5.5 - Single-Core
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
1978 Points
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1961 Points -1%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
1790 Points -10%
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
1778 Points -10%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
1748 Points -12%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
1555 Points -21%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
1514 Points -23%

谈到单核效率,与AMD和英特尔相比,Apple ,他们是明显的赢家。M2 Pro以一英里的距离成为明显的赢家。他们的 M2 Max的结果似乎比M2 Pro差得多--然而,由于我们在处理Apple 芯片在单核负载下的性能时,口径相当低,较小的额外消耗在这里变得更加明显。

英特尔能够通过其新的猛禽湖酷睿i7略微提高其单核效率,但这与AMD的Zen 3+芯片相比仍有差距。

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
140.8 Points per Watt +96%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
71.9 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
55.9 Points per Watt -22%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
55 Points per Watt -24%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
48 Points per Watt -33%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
38 Points per Watt -47%
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
36 Points per Watt -50%
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor)
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
46.6 (44.6min, 44.9P1 - 51.7max) Watt * -106%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
43.8 (36.5min, 38.2P1 - 53.8max) Watt * -94%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
39.1 (35.4min, 36.1P1 - 44max) Watt * -73%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
27.6 (25.7min, 25.9P1 - 41.4max) Watt * -22%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
26.7 (25.2min, 25.5P1 - 41.1max) Watt * -18%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
22.6 (17.4min, 18.2P1 - 29.7max) Watt *
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
11.7 (9.94min, 10.7P1 - 13.6max) Watt * +48%

* ... smaller is better

多核性能和效率

所有新的M2 Pro和M2 Max SoC都获得了两个额外的电源效率内核,这当然对多核性能产生了积极影响。在日常使用中,这两个额外的内核也有助于使芯片更有效率,因为快速和耗能的性能内核不必经常使用。此外,多核测试的结果明显更好,在最好的情况下,两个额外的内核与前面提到的优化措施相结合,使多核性能比旧的M1 Pro和M1 Max提高了20%。拥有10个内核的M2 Pro新基本型号比旧的M1 Pro领先23%。 具有8个核心的M1 Pro(Cinebench R23),落后于老款10核的M1 Pro/M1 Max 5%。两款拥有12个核心的新芯片都比基本型号的M2 Pro快25%。

Cinebench R23 - Multi Core
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
14787 Points 0%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
14767 Points
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
12396 Points -16%
Apple M1 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
12385 Points -16%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
12370 Points -16%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
11811 Points -20%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
9581 Points -35%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
8745 Points -41%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
8517 Points -42%
Geekbench 5.5 - Multi-Core
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
15348 Points
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
14859 Points -3%
Apple M1 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
12708 Points -17%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
12697 Points -17%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
12499 Points -19%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
12189 Points -21%
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
9942 Points -35%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
8991 Points -41%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
8962 Points -42%

当然,与M1 Pro相比,当所有内核都在使用时,额外的内核和更高的时钟速率也增加了能耗。这表明,新的芯片并没有真正提供多少改进,因为在多核测试中效率下降了。正如预期的那样,在Apple ,拥有最大内存量的M2 Max表现最差,但拥有12个核心的M2 Pro也落后于其前辈。

10个核心的入门级M2 Pro的最大能耗上升到28瓦左右(8个核心的M1 Pro:21瓦)--更大的12个核心型号的能耗为34瓦左右(10个核心的M1 Pro:27瓦),M2 Max的能耗为34-36瓦左右(M1 Max:29瓦)。如果不在生产过程中采取下一步措施,Apple ,考虑到额外的两个核心以及更高的时钟速率,根本无法实现更低的能耗。

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
346 Points per Watt +48%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
342 Points per Watt +47%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
290 Points per Watt +24%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
275 Points per Watt +18%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
266 Points per Watt +14%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
250 Points per Watt +7%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
233 Points per Watt
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor)
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
63.5 (61.8min, 62.1P1 - 67.8max) Watt *
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
53.7 (50.8min, 51.2P1 - 60.8max) Watt * +15%
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
47.2 (45.8min, 46.1P1 - 48.5max) Watt * +26%
Apple M1 Max
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
46.6 (45.5min, 45.6P1 - 48.5max) Watt * +27%
Apple M1 Pro
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
42.7 (16.4min, 25.7P1 - 50.1max) Watt * +33%
Apple M2
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
25.3 (24.4min, 24.5P1 - 27.2max) Watt * +60%
Apple M2
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
24.9 (22.3min, 22.3P1 - 29.1max) Watt * +61%

* ... smaller is better

由于芯片的性能提高,Apple ,能够在多核测试中从竞争对手中脱颖而出。在Geekbench测试中,M2芯片在任何情况下都表现出极好的性能--但它们在Cinebench R23测试中也表现出色。Apple 芯片只得承认败给了 酷睿i7-12700H愿景14- 然而,它也消耗了更多的能量(60/40瓦)。因此,Apple ,不应该害怕新的 酷睿i7-1360P来自英特尔最新的Raptor Lake一代(尽管能耗更高)。

在多核测试中,AMD的Zen 3+芯片也被Apple ,但随着Zen 4芯片的到来,这种情况可能会改变。

Performance Rating - Percent
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
99.5 pt
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
98 pt
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
85.8 pt
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
75.1 pt
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7
72.3 pt
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
68.5 pt
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
64.1 pt
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
59.6 pt
Cinebench R23 - Multi Core
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
14917 Points +1%
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
14787 Points 0%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
14767 Points
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7
12711 (12519.2min - 12710.6max) Points -14%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
11922 Points -19%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
11741 Points -20%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
10032 Points -32%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
9235 Points -37%
Geekbench 5.5 - Multi-Core
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
15348 Points
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
14859 Points -3%
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
10976 Points -28%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
10785 Points -30%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
10160 Points -34%
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
Slim 7 Pro X 14ARH7
9109 Points -41%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
8935 Points -42%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
7967 Points -48%

由于M2 Max在最大负荷下的多核效率较低,该芯片落后于 Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U.M2 Pro仍然能够保持领先,但是最新的U系列的Zen 4 CPU应该提供更好的效率,因此胜过Apple"的ARM SoC。英特尔目前在效率评分中排名垫底。

出于兴趣,我们运行了新的 Ryzen 9 7945HX (Zen 4, 5 nm)35瓦,结果在Cinebench R23多重测试中得到16,872分--因此AMD芯片比M2 Pro更有效率。

Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
275 Points per Watt +18%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
240 Points per Watt +3%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
233 Points per Watt
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
232 Points per Watt 0%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
183.7 Points per Watt -21%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
174.6 Points per Watt -25%
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
153.8 Points per Watt -34%
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor)
Intel Core i7-12700H
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
97 (70.2min, 70.3P1 - 103.8max) Watt * -53%
Intel Core i7-1360P
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
64.9 (53min, 53.1P1 - 87.4max) Watt * -2%
Apple M2 Max
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
63.5 (61.8min, 62.1P1 - 67.8max) Watt *
Apple M2 Pro
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
53.7 (50.8min, 51.2P1 - 60.8max) Watt * +15%
Intel Core i7-1260P
MateBook X Pro 2022
52.9 (44.4min, 45P1 - 91max) Watt * +17%
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
Yoga 7-14ARB G7
50.5 (47.9min, 47.9P1 - 62.8max) Watt * +20%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
41.8 (39.9min, 40P1 - 43.5max) Watt * +34%

* ... smaller is better

GPU性能和效率

我们已经看到,Apple ,在看一下普通的M2-SoC时,似乎变化更大。 普通M2-SoC,因为效率也随着其更大的性能而提高。M2 Pro和M2 Max现在总共有四个不同的iGPU--M2 Pro有6或19个GPU核心,M2 Max有32或38个GPU核心。

新的 b新的bse GPU有16个核数与旧的基本型号相比,具有16个核心的新的B ase GPU在 "野外生活极限无限 "测试中快了约20%。 旧的基本型号的速度,而比旧的 16核GPU的M1 Pro.拥有19个核心的版本再次快了16%,比旧的18%。 拥有24个核心的M1 Max GPU.

目前,我们还没有32核心的新M2 Max的基准测试,但我们将尽快添加这些测试。超快的 具有38个内核的M2 Max GPU比老款顶级的 具有32个GPU核心的M1 Max.

3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
25103 Points
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
20293 Points -19%
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
20228 Points -19%
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
15730 Points -37%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
12968 Points -48%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
11224 Points -55%
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
10352 Points -59%
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
9267 Points -63%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
6824 Points -73%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
6823 Points -73%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 Entry
5689 Points -77%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
179.9 fps
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
139.6 fps -22%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
92.1 fps -49%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
78.7 fps -56%
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
71.7 fps -60%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
48.6 fps -73%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 Entry
39.8 fps -78%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
397.6 fps
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
310.3 fps -22%
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Mac Studio 2022 M1 Max
308.5 fps -22%
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
240 fps -40%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
210.4 fps -47%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
181.1 fps -54%
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
166 fps -58%
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
147 fps -63%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
110 fps -72%
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
109.8 fps -72%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 Entry
91 fps -77%

确定Apple's iGPU的能耗并非易事,尤其是M2 Max(就像M1 Max一样),甚至将iGPU长时间推到其最大负荷也不容易。在下面的表格中,我们列出了所有的能源消耗数字。我们能够使用Novabench测试来确定iGPU的最高能耗--这在其他测试中是不可能的。

3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited Novabench
M1 Pro 16C ~20 watts 24 watts
M2 Pro 16C ~23,5 watts 27,5 watts
M2 Pro 19C ~26 watts 30 watts
M1 Max 32C ~44 watts ~49 watts
M2 Max 38C ~48 watts 64 watts

看一下效率,我们将从M2 Pro 16C开始,其更高的性能基本上被其更高的消耗所抵消--最终,其效率与16核的M1 Pro GPU相同。然而,新的19核模型的效率要高6%。

最令人印象深刻的是具有38个核心的新M2 Max GPU - 在我们的Wild Life Extreme Unlimited测试中,它提高了14%。因此,这证实了我们对M2的分析结果,看来Apple ,他们的iGPU改变的不仅仅是内核的数量。

Power Consumption - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited GPU Efficiency (internal tool)
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
593 Points per Watt +13%
Apple M2 8-Core GPU
MacBook Air M2 Entry
590 Points per Watt +13%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
523 Points per Watt
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
519 Points per Watt -1%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
488 Points per Watt -7%
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
484 Points per Watt -7%
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
460 Points per Watt -12%
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
449 Points per Watt -14%

与其Windows竞争对手相比,M2 Max GPU还能保持新的 GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑控制,考虑到其更低的能量摄入,这是一个相当令人印象深刻的成就。从另一个角度看,M2 Pro GPU都位于 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti和新的RTX 4050笔记本电脑 - 也是一个不错的结果。

3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
25103 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample
24275 Points -3%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample
16336 Points -35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5-21DE003RGE
14493 Points -42%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
12968 Points -48%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
11224 Points -55%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
9340 Points -63%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
5048 Points -80%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
4221 Points -83%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MateBook X Pro 2022
3888 Points -85%
AMD Radeon 680M
Zenbook S 13 OLED
3793 Points -85%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
179.9 fps
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample
127.6 fps -29%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Katana 17 B13VFK
107 fps -41%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
92.1 fps -49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample
90 fps -50%
Intel Arc A730M
Erazer Major X10
84.3 fps -53%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
78.7 fps -56%
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
78.3 fps -56%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
28.7 fps -84%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
397.6 fps
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample
288.5 fps -27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Katana 17 B13VFK
248.5 fps -37%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
210.4 fps -47%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample
208 fps -48%
Intel Arc A730M
Erazer Major X10
187 fps -53%
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
185.4 fps -53%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
181.1 fps -54%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
62.7 fps -84%
AMD Radeon 680M
Zenbook S 13 OLED
47.8 fps -88%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample
116498 Points +62%
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
107088 Points +49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Katana 17 B13VFK
101472 Points +41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5-21DE003RGE
93591 Points +30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample
85331 Points +19%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Neptune Series HX90G
74393 Points +4%
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
73796 Points +3%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
71726 Points
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
61067 Points -15%
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
46941 Points -35%
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
42483 Points -41%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
39355 Points -45%
AMD Radeon 680M
Zenbook S 13 OLED
31996 Points -55%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
20890 Points -71%
Intel Arc A730M
Erazer Major X10
20185 Points -72%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MateBook X Pro 2022
19352 Points -73%
Intel Arc A370M
Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
15485 Points -78%

比较效率不是最容易的,因为我们通常只使用TheWitcher 3 测量Windows设备的能耗。利用CrossOver工具,我们可以设法在Mac上运行TheWitcher 3 (事实上非常好),所以我们也可以在这里测量其能耗。但结果仍然不是100%可比的,因为我们不得不在Mac上停用HBAO+和Nvidia HairWorks。如果你考虑到这个游戏没有针对Apple SoC进行优化的事实,以及Apple-native Resident Evil的运行情况,我们只能希望将来有更多的游戏专门针对Apple's处理器发布。

从能耗率来看,Apple GPU远远领先于其竞争对手--即使是新的RTX 40型号也没有机会。

Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor)
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1.028 fps per Watt +9%
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max
0.942 fps per Watt
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
0.941 fps per Watt 0%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Katana 17 B13VFK
0.717 fps per Watt -24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
XMG Neo 17 2023 Engineering Sample
0.68 fps per Watt -28%
AMD Radeon 680M
Zenbook S 13 OLED
0.575 fps per Watt -39%
AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT
m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT)
0.566 fps per Watt -40%
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
0.558 fps per Watt -41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
XMG Focus 15 Engineering Sample
0.548 fps per Watt -42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5-21DE003RGE
0.525 fps per Watt -44%
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
Delta 15 A5EFK
0.524 fps per Watt -44%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
0.4933 fps per Watt -48%
NVIDIA GeForce MX550
IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
0.4924 fps per Watt -48%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Neptune Series HX90G
0.4741 fps per Watt -50%
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Omen 16-c0077ng
0.4398 fps per Watt -53%
Intel Arc A370M
Swift X SFX16-52G-52VE
0.4078 fps per Watt -57%
Intel Arc A730M
Erazer Major X10
0.3391 fps per Watt -64%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
MateBook X Pro 2022
0.2916 fps per Watt -69%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Yoga 9 14IRP G8
0.2766 fps per Watt -71%

结论 - M2 Pro和M2 Max被证明是坚实的更新,但在效率方面没有看到大的跳跃。

配备M2 Pro/M2 Max的MacBook Pro 14和16
配备M2 Pro/M2 Max的MacBook Pro 14和16

即使这次更新在效率上缺少大的跳跃,而且Apple ,继续使用5纳米工艺来制造 M2 ProM2 Max芯片,它仍然是一个坚实的努力。Apple ,能够提高处理器的单核和多核性能。在最大负荷下,与M1 Pro和M1 Max相比,两个额外的核心使得效率略低,但总体而言,额外的功率效率核心对芯片产生了积极影响,因为性能核心不需要经常使用。总的来说,你肯定可以看到新CPU的总效率有所提高。

尽管英特尔以其猛禽湖移动处理器(第13代)提供更高的单核性能,但在多核性能和效率方面,他们无法与Apple 。事实证明,AMD的情况略有不同,因为Ryzen 9 7945HX的(也是5纳米)第一个基准测试显示,它比M2 Pro的35瓦效率更高,我们期望看到U系列芯片与Zen 4(4纳米)的更好结果。

谈到集成显卡,英特尔和AMD都丝毫不能跟上Apple ,相反,Apple ,甚至设法对付RTX 3050 Ti等专用显卡,或者在M2 Max(38核心)的情况下,甚至新的GeForce RTX 4070笔记本电脑.在提高性能的同时,Apple 也设法进一步提高其集成显卡的效率。

特别是与Windows电脑相比,你必须记住两件事。在低负载情况下,MacBooks的功耗极低,除此之外,即使M2 Max处于最高性能水平,你也可以摆脱对Mac电池的依赖--这在可比的Windows组件中根本不可能实现。

还不得不说,Apple ,至少在处理器方面,很快就会获得AMD等公司的一些竞争。我们非常好奇新的U系列Zen 4芯片将如何表现,以及Apple ,是否很快就能通过他们的3纳米芯片实现这种飞跃,这是我们迫切希望看到的。

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple M2 Pro和M2 Max分析--GPU更高效,CPU不一定。
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-03- 6 (Update: 2023-03- 6)