Notebookcheck

微星Delta 15游戏笔记本电脑回顾。Radeon RX 6700M首次亮相

对Nvidia宣战。 虽然AMD在相当长的一段时间内一直处于移动处理器的前沿,但近年来当涉及到他们的移动显卡时,情况显得相当黯淡--至少在高端领域是这样。但现在这种情况正在改变。AMD已经对Nvdia的Ampere GPU发起了明确的正面攻击
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook MSI Ryzen (Zen)
MSI Delta 15

微星Delta 15 A5EFK是首批采用全新的Radeon RX 6700M 的笔记本电脑之一。恰当的是,在引擎盖下运行的是最新的Ryzen系列的高端CPU。R9 5900HX是市场上最强大的笔记本电脑处理器之一。图形显示在哑光全高清面板上,支持240赫兹和FreeSync。

16GB DDR4内存(双通道)和1TB固态硬盘也不赖。我们的评测样本采用Windows 10 Home 64位作为其操作系统。这款15英寸设备的价格略低于2000欧元(约合2320美元),主要要与基于GeForce RTX 3070的笔记本电脑竞争。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK (Delta 15 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.6 GHz, 52 W PL2 / Short Burst, 44 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 6700M - 10240 MB, Core: 1836 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, GDDR6, Adrenalin 21.30.02
Memory
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual-channel, two slots (both in use), max. 64 GB
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LQ156M1JW03 (SHP155D), IPS level, Full HD, FreeSync, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 slots (one in use)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC233 @ AMD K19.5 - Audio Processor - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 combined port (headset/mic)
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 357 x 247
Battery
82 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD (720p, 30 fps)
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 240-watt power adapter, MSI Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.96 kg, Power Supply: 572 g
Price
2,049 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Delta 15的最大竞争对手包括类似尺寸的游戏笔记本电脑,配备Ryzen CPU和Nvidia Ampere一代的高端GPU,如华硕TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR华硕ROG Strix G15 G513QR华硕ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q ,以及 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS

前两台笔记本电脑采用RTX 3070(TGP分别为90和130瓦),而后一台笔记本电脑采用RTX 3080(分别为100和130瓦)。我们在每种情况下都选择了两种不同的比较方案,以便在一定程度上覆盖安培芯片的TGP谱。表中还包括我们评测的第一款RX 6800M设备,即华硕ROG Strix G15 513QY

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.9 %
10/2021
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M
2 kg19 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.7 %
08/2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M
2.4 kg27.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.3 %
09/2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
83.8 %
02/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg20 mm15.60"2560x1440
85 %
03/2021
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"1920x1080
85 %
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例

这款箱子给人留下了良好的印象。虽然它的稳定性在某些方面可以做得更好(例如在掌托中心),但与同样薄的GS系列 相比,Delta 15不允许有那么大的扭转力。建造质量几乎没有任何批评的余地。在我们的审查样本中,几乎所有的元素都能顺利地相互融合。

这款15英寸手机在视觉上也很吸引人。它的设计看起来很新鲜,而且略显俏皮,特别是由于盖子上的龙形标志和底座上的流线型通风栅栏。然而,由于其深灰色的表面(盖子是由金属制成的),Delta 15仍然是相当谨慎的。宽广的光圈角度是另一个亮点(见照片)。只有极少数笔记本电脑能够做到180°。

MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15
MSI Delta 15

尽管拥有极其强大的硬件,Delta 15在游戏笔记本电脑中属于轻量级。大多数竞争对手的重量都超过了2公斤。当涉及到建筑高度时,情况甚至更好。Delta 15的高度为1.9厘米(不包括机箱脚),是测试领域中最薄的设备(其余设备的高度在2.0和2.8厘米之间)。稍后,我们将分析低的构建高度是否对冷却系统或排放有负面影响。

Size comparison

360 mm 256 mm 24 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 257 mm 27.9 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg357 mm 247 mm 19 mm 2 kg355 mm 243 mm 20 mm 2 kg

连接性

接口

Delta 15的连接性本来可以更全面一些。除了读卡器和RJ45端口外,还缺少一个Thunderbolt端口(这是一个与AMD有关的问题)。作为交换,所有可用的USB端口(2个Type-A,2个Type-C)支持现代3.2 Gen 2标准。还包括一个HDMI端口(4K @60 Hz)用于图像输出。由于其中一个Type-C端口提供DisplayPort功能作为替代,所以可以连接两个外部显示器。

端口的分布是相当不理想的。由于它们相对位于侧面区域的中心,在连接鼠标时,你可能面临移动限制。

左侧。电源、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、音频
左侧。电源、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、音频
右侧。USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括显示端口),HDMI,Kensington锁
右侧。USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括显示端口),HDMI,Kensington锁

沟通

尽管Delta 15配备了英特尔最新的无线模块(Wi-Fi 6E AX210),但这还不足以使其在Wi-Fi测试中名列前茅。在发送和接收数据时,15英寸机都排在第五位(与我们的Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器距离为1米)。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1480 (720min - 1589max) MBit/s ∼100% +56%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1360 MBit/s ∼92% +43%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1190 MBit/s ∼80% +25%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (675 - 1602, n=23)
1151 MBit/s ∼78% +21%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
951 (665min - 1326max) MBit/s ∼64%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
631 (581min - 693max) MBit/s ∼43% -34%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1613 (1351min - 1677max) MBit/s ∼100% +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1410 MBit/s ∼87% +18%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1310 MBit/s ∼81% +9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (914 - 1716, n=23)
1300 MBit/s ∼81% +8%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1200 (1128min - 1253max) MBit/s ∼74%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
852 (831min - 887max) MBit/s ∼53% -29%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1200 (1128-1253)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (665-1326)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头的质量不会让任何人感到震惊。正如预期的那样,图像清晰度和色彩准确性都相当一般。

ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
0 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI Delta 15 A5EFK: 12.96 ∆E min: 0 - max: 19.49 ∆E

辅料

盒子里的东西包括一个中等大小的240瓦的电源适配器(572克)和一些信息手册。

维护

微星值得批评的是有限的维护选项。尽管在取出13颗螺丝后,底盖可以被卸下,但由于大量使用了胶纸,机箱内部只有风扇、电池和无线模块可以接触。内存插槽(2个SO-DIMM)以及大容量存储插槽(2个M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4)将需要进一步拆卸。这通常是由竞争对手以更好的方式解决的。

MSI Delta 15

担保

像往常一样,保修期为两年(提货和退货服务)。

输入设备

键盘

首先是积极的方面。喜欢使用方向箭头的用户在Delta 15上会得到他们的金钱回报。除了有点窄的F排(一个典型的问题)之外,几乎所有的键都有很大的尺寸。只有°^键和右边的Ctrl键可以再宽一点。事实上,微星再次使用了其奇特的基础布局,这是一个品味问题。除了<>|键,Fn键也出现在了一个不寻常的地方。对于许多德国用户来说,单行回车键也需要一些时间来适应。购买者一般要放弃数字键盘。

键盘提供的打字体验从体面到良好不等。在作者看来,压力点和行程可以更清晰、更明确一些。作为现代游戏笔记本的典型,微星已经实现了(相当统一的)RGB背光,尽管你不能单独控制每个键,也没有特殊区域。然而,有几种照明模式,可以通过按F8来循环使用。

MSI Delta 15

触摸板

触摸板的尺寸为10.5 x 6.5厘米,相当小,但其操作方式的设计使你很少需要抬起手指来重新定位它。光滑的表面提供了良好的滑行性能。在测试中,该垫子的准确性和多点触摸支持没有显示出任何问题。另一方面,鼠标点击的噪音是相当明显的。总的来说,触控板听起来相当嘈杂,因此质量较差。大多数游戏玩家可能无论如何都会连接一个外部鼠标。

显示

当涉及到显示器时,Delta 15还不能完全跟上竞争者的步伐。虽然色彩空间覆盖率(98% sRGB)和响应时间大致相当,但这台微星笔记本电脑在其余类别中挣扎。

268
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
268
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
263
cd/m²
258
cd/m²
257
cd/m²
262
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LQ156M1JW03 (SHP155D)
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 266.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 291 cd/m²
Contrast: 808:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.98 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
67.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.293
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
LQ156M1JW03 (SHP155D), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Sharp SHP152C, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
CMN N156KME-GNA (CMN152A), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
LQ156M1JW25, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
Sharp SHP1532, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
0%
25%
25%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
66.5
66.48
0%
97.6
47%
97.25
46%
67.7
2%
sRGB Coverage
97.8
97.71
0%
99.9
2%
99.92
2%
94.32
-4%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.6
67.56
0%
85.3
26%
86.17
27%
68.24
1%
Response Times
21%
-14%
12%
24%
-22%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
8 ?(3, 5)
37%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
-9%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
31%
8.2 ?(2.6, 5.6)
36%
12 ?(6, 6)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
10 ?(5, 5)
4%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-19%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-8%
9.2 ?(4.4, 4.8)
12%
8 ?(4, 4)
23%
PWM Frequency
23580 ?(22)
1250 ?(20)
-95%
Screen
-6%
-11%
-17%
9%
33%
Brightness middle
291
306
5%
304.3
5%
327
12%
308
6%
297
2%
Brightness
266
283
6%
286
8%
309
16%
288
8%
268
1%
Brightness Distribution
88
86
-2%
76
-14%
89
1%
86
-2%
84
-5%
Black Level *
0.36
0.25
31%
0.33
8%
0.33
8%
0.23
36%
0.22
39%
Contrast
808
1224
51%
922
14%
991
23%
1339
66%
1350
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.98
4.97
-67%
2.76
7%
4.49
-51%
3.28
-10%
1.36
54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.59
10.12
-33%
5.57
27%
8.42
-11%
8.51
-12%
3.82
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.91
0.7
23%
2.38
-162%
2.27
-149%
0.83
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.2
7.2
-71%
4
5%
4.2
-0%
5
-19%
1.88
55%
Gamma
2.293 96%
2.23 99%
2.14 103%
2.173 101%
2.057 107%
2.48 89%
CCT
7624 85%
7784 84%
6844 95%
7014 93%
7393 88%
6768 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
67.6
86
68
63
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.7
99
90
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / -1%
0% / -4%
7% / -4%
11% / 9%
6% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

除了亮度(平均266cd/m²)和黑度(0.36cd/m²),对比度(808:1)与竞争对手相比也比较弱。由于亮度较差,Delta 15几乎不适合在户外或光线明亮的房间使用。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

这伴随着轻微的蓝色色调,可以通过校准显示器来纠正。我们的ICC文件可以在上面发现的亮度分布对应的区域下载。

微星Delta 15与sRGB对比
微星Delta 15与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
微星Delta 15与AdobeRGB的对比
微星Delta 15与AdobeRGB的对比

由于频率很高(23kHz),显示屏在23%的亮度以下闪烁的事实即使对敏感的用户来说也不应该是个问题。广视角面板的可视角度符合典型的IPS标准。

思考
思考
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.2 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 23580 Hz ≤ 22 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 23580 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 22 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 23580 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 20894 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

预装的MSI中心不仅允许你监控硬件(负载、风扇速度......),而且还允许你调整各种系统设置。最重要的功能是 "用户场景 "菜单,它包含四个预定义的配置文件和一个用户模式。为了最大限度地利用硬件,我们在所有测试中使用了 "极限性能 "模式。只有电池测试是使用 "平衡 "模式进行的。

MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心
MSI中心

业绩

AMD终于回归到高端显卡领域。一旦有关组件供应的情况得到缓解(关键词:"芯片短缺",等等),这应该会导致竞争加剧。由于八核CPU和强大的RX 6700M,Delta 15是一款真正的游戏笔记本电脑,由于其高性能,也将吸引发烧级玩家。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

处理器

从笔记本电脑的尺寸和重量来看,Ryzen 9 5900HX几乎看起来过于强大。这款AMD八核型号在负载下以3.3至4.6 GHz的速度运行,并可通过SMT并行处理多达16个线程。L3缓存为16MB。

我们用Cinebench R15循环检查了7纳米CPU在很长一段时间内的性能。结果是。对于Ryzen 9 5900HX来说,性能仍然出奇地稳定,并排在中等水平。然而,在较新的Cinebench版本(R20和R23)中,Delta 15在对比设备中排名最后,虽然这些设备大多更厚更重。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2078 (2068.68-2093.36)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2130 (2119.21-2144.54)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS: Ø1928 (1865.06-2020.1)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2058 (1969.09-2151.12)
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1903 (1786.91-2018.67)
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13149 Points ∼97% +12%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13066 Points ∼97% +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (6622 - 14363, n=27)
12512 Points ∼93% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
12333 Points ∼91% +5%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11746 Points ∼87%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1488 Points ∼100% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1483 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1478 Points ∼99% +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1218 - 1499, n=26)
1470 Points ∼99% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points ∼99% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1449 Points ∼97%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5158 Points ∼99% +14%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5045 Points ∼97% +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (2242 - 5476, n=27)
4836 Points ∼93% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
4733 Points ∼91% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4553 Points ∼87% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4529 Points ∼87%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
583 Points ∼100% +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
577 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points ∼98% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (471 - 584, n=26)
572 Points ∼98% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
560 Points ∼96% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
559 Points ∼96% -3%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2176 Points ∼99% +4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2151 (1969.09min - 2151.12max) Points ∼98% +3%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2093 (2068.68min - 2093.36max) Points ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1076 - 2267, n=26)
2045 Points ∼93% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
2020 (1865.06min - 2020.1max) Points ∼92% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2019 (1786.91min - 2018.67max) Points ∼92% -4%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
238 Points ∼99% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (197 - 243, n=22)
238 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points ∼97% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
233 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
211 Points ∼88% -12%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
268 Seconds * ∼100% -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (219 - 442, n=26)
250 Seconds * ∼93% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
249 Seconds * ∼93% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
245 Seconds * ∼91% -2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Seconds * ∼90%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * ∼90% -0%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
229.9 Seconds * ∼86% +5%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
59680 MIPS ∼97% +2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
58752 MIPS ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (36011 - 62503, n=26)
57313 MIPS ∼93% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55954 MIPS ∼91% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55335 MIPS ∼90% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53767 MIPS ∼88% -8%
7z b 4 -mmt1
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5737 MIPS ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (4791 - 5905, n=26)
5704 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5678 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
5669 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5558 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
8689 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (5057 - 9294, n=24)
8117 Points ∼93% -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
7910 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7621 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7607 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7518 Points ∼87% -13%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1561 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (1271 - 1561, n=24)
1512 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1496 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1487 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1443 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
1410 Points ∼90% -10%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps ∼100% 0%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (8.26 - 17.1, n=26)
15.2 fps ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
14.4 fps ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
13.8 fps ∼88% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13.4 fps ∼86% -14%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
54.9 s * ∼100% -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (44.1 - 87.4, n=26)
53.4 s * ∼97% -1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.9 s * ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.4 s * ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * ∼95% +1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
50.3 s * ∼92% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
49.1 s * ∼89% +7%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
0.538 sec * ∼100% -8%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.512 sec * ∼95% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼95% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.512 sec * ∼95% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
  (0.48 - 0.599, n=26)
0.507 sec * ∼94% -2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4969 sec * ∼92%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * ∼91% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15120
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
159.58 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2093 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
186 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
239 Points
Help

系统性能

微星笔记本电脑在系统性能方面确实可以给人留下深刻印象。在PCMark 10中的7,316分代表了最高位置。主观上也是如此,操作系统的运行速度非常快,反应迅速。

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
7316 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
7167 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6922 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6917 Points ∼95% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6896 Points ∼94% -6%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
10444 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
10204 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10198 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10113 Points ∼97% -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points ∼100% +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9514 Points ∼95% 0%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9481 Points ∼94%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9390 Points ∼93% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
9060 Points ∼90% -4%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
10806 Points ∼100% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
10731 Points ∼99%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points ∼91% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9375 Points ∼87% -13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9257 Points ∼86% -14%
PCMark 10 Score
7316 points
Help

DPC延迟

想要实时编辑音频和/或视频的用户可能需要做一些改变。根据LatencyMon工具,开箱即用的延迟相当高,在相应的应用场景中可能会导致问题。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
2542 μs * ∼100% -61%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1580.8 μs * ∼62%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1379.5 μs * ∼54% +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
999.1 μs * ∼39% +37%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
466.9 μs * ∼18% +70%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
355.1 μs * ∼14% +78%

* ... smaller is better

储存

微星在Delta 15的测试配置中安装了一块1000GB的NVMe SSD作为大容量存储设备。根据我们的基准测试,美光2210与三星PM991(华硕G513QY)基本持平。华硕G533QS中的威刚固态硬盘较慢,但华硕GA503Q和FA506QR中的SK海力士固态硬盘更快。

MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
8%
-12%
30%
36%
Write 4K
136.2
140.4
3%
134.7
-1%
156.4
15%
182.5
34%
Read 4K
59.91
48.91
-18%
34.46
-42%
66.69
11%
73.21
22%
Write Seq
1846
1613
-13%
1123
-39%
2318
26%
3005
63%
Read Seq
1714
2043
19%
1691
-1%
2151
25%
2358
38%
Write 4K Q32T1
344.2
482.5
40%
580.8
69%
525
53%
389.5
13%
Read 4K Q32T1
582
552.6
-5%
423.6
-27%
452.1
-22%
463.8
-20%
Write Seq Q32T1
1874
1612.1
-14%
1131
-40%
3055
63%
3166
69%
Read Seq Q32T1
2096
3105.3
48%
1859
-11%
3607
72%
3590
71%
AS SSD
9%
-117%
35%
50%
Seq Read
2023.32
2705.7
34%
1756.8
-13%
2949.59
46%
3132.97
55%
Seq Write
1836.21
1652.1
-10%
1070.56
-42%
1600.23
-13%
2968.8
62%
4K Read
56.38
45.46
-19%
22.07
-61%
53.56
-5%
55.16
-2%
4K Write
130.17
128.5
-1%
124.24
-5%
126.8
-3%
129.7
0%
4K-64 Read
899.04
1342.45
49%
439.41
-51%
1429.48
59%
1890.98
110%
4K-64 Write
1163.93
1066.33
-8%
650.68
-44%
2177.16
87%
1794.72
54%
Access Time Read *
0.096
0.095
1%
0.043
55%
0.064
33%
0.052
46%
Access Time Write *
0.031
0.03
3%
0.341
-1000%
0.029
6%
0.028
10%
Score Read
1158
1658
43%
637
-45%
1778
54%
2259
95%
Score Write
1478
1360
-8%
882
-40%
2464
67%
2221
50%
Score Total
3233
3818
18%
1814
-44%
5090
57%
5630
74%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
9% / 9%
-65% / -73%
33% / 33%
43% / 44%

* ... smaller is better

Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2096 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1874 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 582 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 344.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1714 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1846 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 59.91 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 136.2 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

图形卡

Delta 15的主要亮点无疑是全新的GPU。通过Radeon RX 6700M,AMD为Nvidia著名的安培一代(RTX 3060至RTX 3080)提供了高端的对应产品。仅从显存的数量就可以看出,AMD在认真对待此事。10GB的GDDR6内存对于一个顶级移动游戏模型来说是合适的。相比之下,RTX 3070只能用8GB,而RTX 3060只有6GB。

考虑到现代游戏对VRAM的要求越来越极端(如 死亡之路,生化危机村,或 Far Cry 6),这是一个深思熟虑和令人高兴的决定,也确保了用户的高度未来性。其他规格,如时钟频率、着色器数量和内存接口,可以在我们专门的 GPU文章中找到

在我们的基准测试课程中,RX 6700M在与Nvidia的竞争中表现非常好。这样一来,AMD芯片的表现通常达到了GeForce RTX 3070的水平,这与最初的预期是一致的。在3DMark的Fire Strike 测试中,RX 6700M实际上超过了Nvidia的顶级型号,GeForce RTX 3080(至少在TGP版本的对比设备中)。目前还不是很普及的Radeon RX 6800M,平均领先20%左右。

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
41706 Points ∼100% +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
39782 Points ∼95% +19%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
33862 Points ∼81% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
33497 Points ∼80%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
29289 Points ∼70% -13%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
34993 Points ∼100% +23%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
28399 Points ∼81%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26956 Points ∼77% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
25509 Points ∼73% -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
22826 Points ∼65% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
22200 Points ∼63% -22%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
11396 Points ∼100% +22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Radeon RX 6800M
11313 Points ∼99% +21%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
10148 Points ∼89% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9439 Points ∼83% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
9323 Points ∼82%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8407 Points ∼74% -10%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
46372 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
66973 points
3DMark 11 Performance
25929 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
136454 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47472 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24294 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9360 points
Help

游戏性能

游戏性能等级在很大程度上取决于光线追踪。当启用光线追踪时,Radeon RX 6700M经常被安培一代击败,倾向于与较早的图灵对应产品持平。因此,这种新技术的粉丝还是选择Nvidia比较好。

如果你在没有光线追踪的情况下进行游戏,反正大多数游戏中都没有光线追踪,Delta 15的性能非常好。正如在合成图形基准测试中,Radeon RX 6700M对GeForce RTX 3070,有时甚至对RTX 3080的日常游戏构成威胁。所以Nvidia在这里需要小心。

一般来说,Radeon RX 6700M的速度足以将任何现代游戏在原生全高清分辨率(1920x1080)和最大设置下流畅地呈现在屏幕上。只有在要求极高或程序较差的游戏中,如孤岛危机重制版赛博朋克2077帧率才会降到60FPS以下。

Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
79 (68min) fps ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
77 fps ∼97% +4%
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
74 (63min) fps ∼94% 0%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
74 (47min) fps ∼94%
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
69 (53min) fps ∼87% -7%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
61 (52min) fps ∼100% +13%
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
59 (53min) fps ∼97% +9%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
54 (27min) fps ∼89%
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
34 (9min) fps ∼56% -37%
Cyberpunk 2077
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
60.2 (19.1min, 37.1P0.1, 48.2P1 - 90.6max) fps ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
57 fps ∼95% +1%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
56.5 (21.6min, 40.4P0.1, 46.2P1 - 107max) fps ∼94%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
30.6 (18.5min, 24.1P0.1, 26.2P1 - 53.3max) fps ∼100% +84%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
16.6 (13.7min, 14P0.1, 14.4P1 - 21.3max) fps ∼54%
Watch Dogs Legion
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
65 (32min) fps ∼100% +2%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
64 (31min) fps ∼98%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray Tracing (DX12)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
41 (13min) fps ∼100% +128%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
18 (9min) fps ∼44%
Control
1920x1080 High Quality Preset (DX11)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
82.3 (37min) fps ∼100% 0%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
82.2 (72min) fps ∼100%
1920x1080 High Quality Preset & High Ray Tracing Preset (DX12)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
53.5 (16min) fps ∼100% +27%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
42.2 (14min) fps ∼79%
Resident Evil Village
1920x1080 Max Preset
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
140 (113min, 116P0.1, 120P1 - 193max) fps ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
91.9 (13min, 35.2P0.1, 59.5P1 - 152max) fps ∼66% -34%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Preset
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
70.5 (49.1min, 51.4P0.1, 57.4P1 - 90.7max) fps ∼100%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Radeon RX 6800M, R9 5900HX
110 (12.5min, 56.5P0.1, 86.1P1 - 170max) fps ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
105.8 (100min - 112max) fps ∼96% +11%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Radeon RX 6700M, R9 5900HX
95.4 (79min) fps ∼87%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX
92.9 (70min) fps ∼84% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS
90.2 fps ∼82% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
78 fps ∼71% -18%

一个小小的缺点。根据我们的60分钟测试,用这Witcher 3(全高清/超清),3D性能在长时间的负载后会有一些下降。这个问题主要与笔记本电脑(冷却系统)有关,不一定与显卡有关。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M: Ø81.6 (69-87)
low med. high ultra
GTA V (2015) 169 147 86.2 fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 223 164 95.4 fps
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 130 123 112 fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 113 83.8 fps
Far Cry 5 (2018) 103 97 91 fps
Strange Brigade (2018) 202 186 170 fps
Control (2019) 117 82.2 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 100 86.9 71.2 fps
Need for Speed Heat (2019) 98.2 90.5 82.8 fps
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) 100 90.6 87.9 fps
Hunt Showdown (2020) 125 100 fps
Doom Eternal (2020) 200 182 175 fps
Gears Tactics (2020) 208 134 96.2 fps
Death Stranding (2020) 144 134 131 fps
Crysis Remastered (2020) 146 63.6 45.9 fps
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 105 98 79.8 fps
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 93.4 85.5 fps
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 233 232 219 fps
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 96 87 64 fps
Dirt 5 (2020) 119 98.8 80.6 fps
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 98 82 71 fps
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 111 96.2 90.2 fps
Immortals Fenyx Rising (2020) 83 81 78 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (2020) 85.4 67.9 56.5 fps
Hitman 3 (2021) 175 154 144 fps
Outriders (2021) 107 98.1 94.6 fps
Resident Evil Village (2021) 171 161 140 fps
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 99.6 fps
Days Gone (2021) 113 106 80.5 fps
Monster Hunter Stories 2 (2021) 143 142 fps
F1 2021 (2021) 212 185 100 fps
Deathloop (2021) 99.8 85.1 77.3 fps
New World (2021) 82.2 78.5 73 fps
FIFA 22 (2021) 229 224 217 fps
Far Cry 6 (2021) 97 82 74 fps
Back 4 Blood (2021) 195 163 149 fps

排放

噪声排放

当涉及到噪音发展时,没有任何惊喜。负载下的47至51 dB(A)是游戏笔记本电脑的典型值,这也符合竞争对手的要求。在这个水平上,这台15英寸的笔记本在3D模式下既不安静也不太响亮。

当笔记本电脑闲置时,风扇偶尔会安静下来。然而,像启动程序这样的小任务会迅速导致风扇转速上升,这相当令人讨厌。也就是说,如前所述,我们使用了最高性能模式(例如,还有一个 "静音 "模式)。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204241.64241.243.4442537.439.640.33838.339.53148.951.547.647.542.949.44034.235.931.532.430.933.65038.938.538.538.538.639.1633636.134.433.827.735.68024.526.320.92019.73310027.925.923.823.323.62812526.122.121.920.718.926.916030.924.224.423.722.530.720030.125.423.723.520.729.5250312719.419.116.6323153226.419.715.814.535.840029.525.717.313.112.43350031.127.218.51212.3356303228.119.511.411.936.1800322718.611.311.735.8100032.727.91910.912.237.2125034.229.620.211.511.838.8160037.22918.811.511.540.6200037.729.418.211.611.841.7250035.829.317.211.911.940.7315036.528.61612.412.240.2400037.127.116.11312.942.4500033.124.715.9131338.4630030.521.313.712.912.935.4800029.220.813.512.913.134.41000024.815.81312.712.930.51250019.413.212.612.312.425.31600014.912.212.211.61219.5SPL46.839.429.825.224.951N5.63.21.30.70.67.6median 31.1median 26.4median 18.5median 12.7median 12.4median 35.4Delta2.12.922.424.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMSI Delta 15 A5EFK

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 30 / 40 dB(A)
Load
47 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Noise
2%
4%
3%
3%
7%
off / environment *
25
26
-4%
25.5
-2%
25
-0%
24
4%
26
-4%
Idle Minimum *
25
26
-4%
25.5
-2%
26
-4%
25
-0%
26
-4%
Idle Average *
30
31
-3%
25.5
15%
27
10%
31
-3%
26
13%
Idle Maximum *
40
34
15%
37.1
7%
31
22%
33
17%
27.4
31%
Load Average *
47
44
6%
39.2
17%
49
-4%
45
4%
46.6
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
48.5
-1%
50.5
-5%
49
-2%
48
-0%
Load Maximum *
51
49
4%
51.8
-2%
51
-0%
50
2%
49.3
3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

与竞争对手相比,温度发展也很平均。在FurMark和Prime95工具的压力测试中,机箱分别加热到50℃(约122°F)(顶部)和55℃(约131°F)(底部)。在我们的TheWitcher 3测试中,结果也是类似的。因此,如果可能的话,你不应该把设备放在你的膝盖上玩游戏。整个机箱在闲置时保持令人愉快的冷却。大部分的表面都保持在30°C(约86°F)以下。

下面的屏幕截图显示了组件在负载下的表现。不错:CPU和GPU都没有超过80 °C (~176 °F)。

ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
ǞǞǞWitcher 3
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Max. Load
 47 °C50 °C44 °C 
 44 °C47 °C45 °C 
 34 °C38 °C39 °C 
Maximum: 50 °C
Average: 43.1 °C
53 °C55 °C47 °C
53 °C53 °C43 °C
42 °C42 °C38 °C
Maximum: 55 °C
Average: 47.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.2 °C / 104 F, ranging from 21.6 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55 °C / 131 F, compared to the average of 43 °C / 109 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the device average of 33.7 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 39 °C / 102.2 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29 °C / 84.2 F (-10 °C / -18 F).
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6700M
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
R9 5900HX, Radeon RX 6800M
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G15 GA503Q
R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QR
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506QR-AZ061T
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
Heat
8%
-3%
-3%
1%
-11%
Maximum Upper Side *
50
38.9
22%
43.4
13%
51
-2%
49
2%
46.7
7%
Maximum Bottom *
55
34.6
37%
48.2
12%
56
-2%
48
13%
55.9
-2%
Idle Upper Side *
31
34.4
-11%
35.2
-14%
29
6%
31
-0%
37.1
-20%
Idle Bottom *
30
34.4
-15%
37
-23%
34
-13%
33
-10%
38.1
-27%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

我们将内置2.0系统的音质描述为体面的,尽管低音和最大音量还有待改进,这是笔记本电脑的典型特征。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.441.22538.3363142.9524030.936.35038.638.96327.737.18019.729.710023.638.212518.943.716022.547.520020.752.925016.660.131514.561.140012.463.250012.369.163011.972.380011.769100012.270.2125011.868.7160011.565.9200011.867.5250011.965.5315012.258.7400012.966.250001371.2630012.970.7800013.163.51000012.9591250012.450.4160001245.5SPL24.979.9N0.648.8median 12.4median 63.5Delta2841.740.236.937.642.749.429.535.62330.221.739.316.142.614.451.314.657.916.559.820.161.316.664.911.965.810.566.110.566.71070.310.266.310.665.210.761.610.96111.358.711.764.712.267.212.370.112.66512.96413.166.512.763.412.461.512.957.624.177.50.545.6median 12.3median 64.71.63.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMSI Delta 15 A5EFKAsus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 17%, worst was 37%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, wo