Notebookcheck Logo

华硕Zenbook S 13 OLED笔记本电脑回顾。副笔记本以快速的AMD Ryzen 7 6800U给人留下深刻印象

25瓦的Zen3+的首演。 华硕新的Zenbook S 13是一款非常紧凑的笔记本,重量仅有1公斤多,但由于采用了新的AMD Ryzen 7 6800U,所以在性能上并没有削减。由于采用了软件解决方案,OLED屏幕确保了良好的图像质量,并且不存在PWM。
AMD Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen) Ultrabook Windows

新的华硕Zenbook S 13是一款超移动笔记本,重量仅为1公斤,并提供目前最新的技术。除了2.8K OLED屏幕(13.3英寸)外,客户还得到了AMD的最新移动芯片,即 Ryzen 7 6800U,其中还包括快速的 Radeon 680M集成显卡。另外,也可以选择使用英特尔最新的Alder Lake芯片的型号。在这里,我们处理的是一台传统的笔记本电脑,但那些喜欢可转换的人应该看看Zenbook S 13 Flip。

我们的评测单元配备了新的AMD Ryzen 7 6800U,快速的Radeon 680M图形,16GB内存,1TB PCIe 4.0固态硬盘和2.8K OLED屏幕。在写这篇文章的时候,Zenbook S 13还没有在商店出售,但据预测,定价将在1000-1500美元之间。

Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED (Zenbook S Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U 8 x 2.7 - 4.7 GHz, 30 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 680M, Core: 2200DC MHz
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, Onboard
Display
13.30 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 255 PPI, capacitive, SDC4172, OLED, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 905 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 0 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 14.9 x 296.7 x 210.5
Battery
67 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad-Speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 65W PSU, MyAsus, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.095 kg, Power Supply: 222 g
Price
1500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
90.1 %
07/2022
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
1.1 kg14.9 mm13.30"2880x1800
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600
88.3 %
06/2021
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg14.8 mm13.40"3456x2160
86.7 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
885 g11 mm13.30"1920x1080
88.8 %
02/2022
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg16.5 mm13.40"2520x1680

外壳。华硕提供四种颜色的金属外壳

华硕使用镁铝合金做外壳,Zenbook显得非常高质量。它也非常紧凑和机动,重量仅超过一公斤。我们的评测单元采用深思蓝的颜色,看起来非常优雅,略微粗糙的表面也感觉不错。然而,这些表面也是相当敏感的指纹。华硕提供了其他可选的颜色变体,其键盘也会改变颜色。除了白色外,Zenbook S13还有浅绿色和米色可供选择。

屏幕的边缘在侧面特别薄,但显示屏的顶部和底部边缘还有改进的余地。因此,Zenbook实现的机身与屏幕的比例只有81%。与其他笔记本电脑一样,华硕使用了所谓的Ergo-Lift铰链,在背面略微提高了基本单元。这改善了新鲜空气的供应,也实现了180度的开启角度。铰链本身是非常有教养的,用一只手打开它需要一些技巧,但在调整打开角度时,摇晃的幅度很小。

底座单元本身的稳定性非常好,没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音。与掌托区相比,键盘区略微凹陷,允许键盘有更多的行程。由于底座略微凸起,键盘的后部中心区域在大量压力下屈服,但这需要大量的用力,在日常使用中应该不会构成问题。尽管显示屏盖子很薄,但它非常稳定。

我们的带触摸屏的版本重量为1.095公斤。没有触摸支持的型号被华硕指定为重量少100克。Zenbook可以很容易地被收进任何袋子或背包。只有 戴尔XPS 13在我们的对比组中,只有戴尔XPS 13在深度上明显占用了较少的空间,但也稍重一些。

尺寸比较

304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg306 mm 200 mm 11 mm 885 g297.2 mm 218.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.3 kg296.7 mm 210.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备。AMD-Zenbook已具备USB-4功能

从根本上说,Zenbook S 13提供了一个3.5毫米耳机插孔和三个USB-C端口。这些仅支持USB 3.2标准,但以后可以通过BIOS更新升级到完整的40GBit/s的USB 4,在股票规格方面与Thunderbolt 4协议没有区别。据AMD称,未来还将支持外置显卡,相应的更新应该在Zenbook上市后不久就会推出。

左边:USB-C (3.2 Gen.2, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4)
左边:USB-C (3.2 Gen.2, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4)
右边:2个USB-C (3.2 Gen.2, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4)
右边:2个USB-C (3.2 Gen.2, Power Delivery, DisplayPort 1.4)

沟通

可以更换WLAN模块。
可以更换WLAN模块。

联发科的最新模块被用作Wi-Fi适配器(MT9972),它也支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。至少在理论上,因为我们的Zenbook S 13的美国设备拒绝连接到我们的华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。

尽管如此,在正常的5GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6)上,传输速率非常好,也很稳定。对蓝牙5.2的支持也是可用的。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  ()
1412 MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
909 (814min - 1010max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
617 (220min - 685max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
552 (257min - 620max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  ()
1700 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (681min - 1483max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1258 (1143min - 1362max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
672 (614min - 682max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (1365min - 1583max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=37)
1348 MBit/s -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 1824, n=47, last 2 years)
1263 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1553 (1443min - 1620max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (848 - 1775, n=37)
1450 MBit/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (353 - 1775, n=47, last 2 years)
1407 MBit/s -9%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1553 (1443-1620)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (1365-1583)

网络摄像头

华硕继续使用720p模块的网络摄像头,即使在最佳照明条件下也不能真正拍出好照片。

ColorChecker
13.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
20 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED: 10.05 ∆E min: 2.75 - max: 20.04 ∆E

维护

底板用小的Torx螺钉(T5)固定,但除了可见的螺钉外,还有两个隐藏在两个后部橡胶脚下的螺钉,它们本身是用胶水粘住的。几乎没有比这更复杂的了。

一旦进入内部,在维护或升级方面可以做的事情不多。除了风扇清洁和访问M.2-2280固态硬盘外,只有WLAN模块可以更换。

螺钉隐藏在胶合的橡胶脚下。
螺钉隐藏在胶合的橡胶脚下。
内部工作方式
内部工作方式

输入设备。华硕安装了一个舒适的键盘

键盘

对于这样一个紧凑的笔记本,Zenbook提供了一个相对慷慨的1.4毫米的键位。打字的感觉总体上非常好,由于反馈精确,打长文没有问题。然而,击键本身可以更安静一些。方向键相当小,但除此之外,其布局没有什么值得批评的地方。电源键位于键盘的右上方,使用了一个略微不同的机制,冲程较短,点击的声音有点大。它也是一个指纹扫描仪,在测试中可靠地工作。

三段式白色背光在黑暗环境下有帮助,但不能通过传感器自动激活。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

触摸板和触摸屏

触摸板也可以作为数字键盘使用。
触摸板也可以作为数字键盘使用。

大的ClickPad在实践中工作得非常好,用四个手指做手势也能正确实现。按右上角会在触摸板上出现一个数字板,这个数字板运行良好,在输入大量数字时证明非常有用。正常的光标控制功能也很正常。触摸板的下半部分可以机械地点击,但与许多其他笔记本电脑一样,这具有非常响亮的点击噪音的特点。

当然,电容式触摸屏也可以使用,它的工作原理与预期的一样完美。据华硕称,还支持手写笔,但我们的评测样品中没有提供这个。

显示器。有软件对抗PWM的Zenbook

子像素网格
子像素网格

Zenbook S 13配备了一个16:10的OLED屏幕,在其13.3英寸的对角线上提供了2880 x 1,800的高分辨率。主观的画质,其与生动的色彩和锐利的内容,是非常好的。

华硕规定最大亮度可达550cd/m²,但这只适用于HDR内容。我们的测量结果显示,小幅白色图像的最大亮度为~570 cd/m²,然后在接近完整的白色图像中变成~460 cd/m²。不幸的是,HDR切换不会自动工作,而是必须在Windows显示设置中手动激活。

对于正常的SDR内容,最大亮度只有340cd/m²。图片印象自然得益于特别低的黑值,这反过来又导致了非常高的对比度。由于OLED技术,光晕不是一个问题,而且响应时间非常快。MyAsus应用程序中有一些功能(如像素移动),是为了防止静态内容的烧毁。然而,用于自动亮度控制的环境光传感器是缺乏的。

339
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
339
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
340
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
SDC4172 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 340 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 337.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: 16800:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.8
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
ATNA33XC10-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
TL134GDXP02-0, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Display
-4%
0%
-1%
-25%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
98.6
-1%
99.7
0%
99.81
0%
65.2
-35%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
92
-8%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97.8
85.9
-12%
97.7
0%
95.55
-2%
67.5
-31%
Response Times
15385%
-12%
-61%
229%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2.1 ?(1.1, 1)
31 ?(14, 17)
-1376%
2.2 ?(1.2, 1)
-5%
4 ?(2, 2)
-90%
44.8 ?(22, 22.8)
-2033%
Response Time Black / White *
1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82)
26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2)
-1454%
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
-31%
2 ?(1, 1)
-19%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
-1257%
PWM Frequency
240.4 ?(53)
118000 ?(49, 155)
48985%
240.4 ?(51)
0%
61 ?(90)
-75%
9804 ?(20, 47)
3978%
Screen
-208%
-62%
-40%
-145%
Brightness middle
336
417
24%
384
14%
399
19%
468
39%
Brightness
338
395
17%
387
14%
403
19%
450
33%
Brightness Distribution
99
91
-8%
97
-2%
98
-1%
92
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.39
-1850%
0.07
-250%
0.23
-1050%
Contrast
16800
1069
-94%
5700
-66%
2035
-88%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
1.12
38%
4.56
-153%
1.35
25%
2
-11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.8
2.71
29%
7.27
-91%
2.77
27%
5.5
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.8
0.77
57%
4.52
-151%
1.35
25%
1.5
17%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
0.9
1.7
-89%
1.5
-67%
2.35
-161%
2.6
-189%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2207 0%
2.26 97%
2.21 100%
2.17 101%
CCT
6580 99%
6870 95%
6219 105%
6824 95%
6511 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5058% / 2951%
-25% / -36%
-34% / -37%
20% / -46%

* ... smaller is better

在预装的MyAsus应用程序中,可以对色彩空间进行各种设置。我们选择了预设的 "本地 "模式,通过专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行测试。在交付状态下,显示质量已经非常好,没有明显的偏色或色温的偏差。颜色中只有两个异常值,略高于DeltaE-2000的重要偏差3。

CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN饱和度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN饱和度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。

当然,我们也对面板进行了校准(相应的配置文件可在上面下载),我们也能够稍微改善灰度的平均DeltaE-2000偏差,但在颜色方面没有变化。因此,购买后的校准其实是没有必要的。OLED面板几乎完全覆盖了P3色彩空间,因此你可以在Zenbook上编辑图片/视频,没有问题。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.86 ms rise
↘ 0.82 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240.4 Hz ≤ 53 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 53 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

亮度为60%,通过MyAsus应用程序进行额外调光。亮度只有6cd/m²,但在240赫兹时没有PWM。
亮度为60%,通过MyAsus应用程序进行额外调光。亮度只有6cd/m²,但在240赫兹时没有PWM。

禅书Pro 14 Duo,Zenbook S 13的OLED面板以240赫兹的频率显示PWM闪烁,这可能会导致损害的发生。另一方面,直流调光用于54%以上的亮度值。虽然频率为60赫兹,但与经典的PWM无法相比,而且振幅也明显较低,所以直流调光应该不会有问题。华硕还提供了一个基于软件的解决方案,可以在不落入PWM范围的情况下降低屏幕的亮度,而且只要你把正常亮度降低到60%以下,也会有相应的通知。为此,在MyAsus应用程序中,有无闪烁的OLED调光选项。用户应该记住,在使用OLED调光时,总是使用直流调光,即使基本亮度被设置为100%。

100%的亮度
100%的亮度
80%的亮度
80%的亮度
60%的亮度
60%的亮度
53%的亮度
53%的亮度
40%的亮度
40%的亮度
20%的亮度
20%的亮度
0%的亮度
0%的亮度
窗户或光源也会在室内造成反射。
窗户或光源也会在室内造成反射。

OLED触摸屏具有高反射性,在室内也会引起反射。当然,这也适用于户外使用。虽然亮度不是很高,但非常高的对比度在这些情况下有帮助。也就是说,在明亮的日子里,避免反射和舒适地阅读屏幕内容并不容易。正常SDR模式下的全HDR亮度在这里肯定会有帮助。

户外活动
户外活动

OLED屏幕的可视角度稳定性总体上非常好,但在某些(有限的)角度上有典型的OLED蓝色色调。尽管如此,这在实践中并没有造成任何限制。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能。AMD Zen3+和RDNA2

 
 

测试条件

我们在MyAsus应用程序中的(默认)平衡电源模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量,因为可选的性能模式(仅在插入时可用)最初对TDP限制(各为30/25W)没有影响,而且只导致在永久负载下的性能稍微稳定,这对这样的移动设备来说当然不是一个关键因素。平衡模式只是更适合设备的日常使用,如果你确实想把设备的性能发挥到极致,你可以轻松切换到性能模式。尽管如此,我们还将在一些测试领域看看性能模式的效果。在可选的Whisper模式下,处理器的消耗被限制在12瓦特。

处理器。Ryzen 7 6800U,8个核心

如其 锐真7 5800U前辈一样,新的 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U继续使用8个内核(16个线程),现在使用6纳米工艺制造。AMD规定芯片的TDP范围为15-28瓦,在Zenbook的情况下,短时负载为30瓦,之后稳定为25瓦。在这里,我们看到了与英特尔目前的Alder Lake处理器的明显区别,后者的功率限制明显更高,超过50瓦,供其支配。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø695 (607.28-765.86)
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø878 (859.75-883.65)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Standard: Ø922 (913.26-969.84)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Performance: Ø958 (953.54-961.86)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1118 (1067.98-1158.61)
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1634 (1600.9-1805.05)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多环路(平衡模式)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多环路(平衡模式)

Cinebench R15多循环清楚地表明,Ryzen 7 6800U在头几次运行后只损失了一点性能,然后在25瓦下稳定地运行。然而,与旧的Ryzen 7 5800U相比,也没有明显的性能优势。CB循环显示在性能模式下没有任何好处。

Ryzen 7的真正竞争者是新的酷睿i7-1255U我们能够在戴尔Inspiron 14上测试它。 戴尔Inspiron 14。这款产品在短时间内消耗高达39瓦,然后迅速平息在23瓦,这与Ryzen 7 6800U相当。然而,[酷睿i7-1255U]的多核性能显著降低(在CB循环期间为-30%)。事实上,桤木湖P 酷睿i7-1260P芯片在多核性能方面具有可比性,尽管由于额外的性能核心,它自然需要明显更多的功率(恒定的38瓦)。

在原始单核性能方面,AMD和Apple ,几乎不相上下(尽管Apple ,在这里效率更高),但由于性能核心的存在,英特尔在这里获得了领先。然而,这是以更高的时钟频率和更高的功耗为代价的,这通常也会导致风扇活动增加。

总而言之,新的Ryzen 7 6800U,由于其功率限制,是一个适合紧凑型笔记本电脑的处理器。然而,在电池模式下,性能会有所下降,因为处理器最多只允许消耗18瓦,几秒钟后降至16瓦。这并不影响单核性能,而多核性能则降低约25%。在12瓦的Whisper模式下,多核性能下降了约35%。

更多基准测试可在我们的 技术部分我们还建议看一下我们广泛的CPU效率比较评论。,在那里我们将新的AMD处理器与目前来自Apple 和英特尔的芯片进行比较。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
88.8 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
87.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
84.3 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
83.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
 
82.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
75.2 pt
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
74.7 pt
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry -1!
Apple M1
66.3 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
59.2 pt
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
57.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
36.2 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10735 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (9130 - 11741, n=7)
10653 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)
10289 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
8068 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7409 (6401.39min - 7409.31max) Points -29%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
7385 (7081.74min - 7384.56max) Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
5680 Points -46%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5186 Points -50%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5013 (4398.92min - 5012.66max) Points -52%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1793 Points +20%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
1775 Points +19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)
1627 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1496 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1457 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1430 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (878 - 1534, n=7)
1418 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1218 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
640 Points -57%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (3529 - 4574, n=8)
4122 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
4048 Points 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)
3963 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
2995 Points -26%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
2870 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
2178 Points -46%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1982 Points -51%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1873 Points -54%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1863 Points -54%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
682 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
657 Points +16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)
610 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
560 Points -1%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
556 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (341 - 602, n=8)
553 Points -2%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
431 Points -24%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
401 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
251 Points -55%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1925 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1691 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1805 (1600.9min - 1805.05max) Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (1463 - 1979, n=7)
1766 Points +1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)
1757 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points -24%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
1159 (1067.98min - 1158.61max) Points -33%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1020 (817min - 1020max) Points -41%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
970 (913.26min - 969.84max) Points -44%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
961 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
884 (859.75min - 883.65max) Points -49%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
766 (607.28min - 765.86max) Points -56%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
251 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
243 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)
237 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
229 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (142.6 - 246, n=6)
225 Points -5%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
221 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
208 Points -12%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
208 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
91.8 Points -61%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
710 Seconds * -129%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
637 Seconds * -105%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
559 Seconds * -80%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
509 Seconds * -64%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
416 Seconds * -34%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
391 Seconds * -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)
386 Seconds * -25%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (272 - 347, n=7)
303 Seconds * +2%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
300 Seconds * +3%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (40058 - 53934, n=6)
49128 MIPS +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47500 MIPS
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
45227 MIPS -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years)
44459 MIPS -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
39618 MIPS -17%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
34614 MIPS -27%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
29874 MIPS -37%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
26001 MIPS -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
23132 MIPS -51%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
18812 MIPS -60%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
5529 MIPS +2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
5441 MIPS 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5431 MIPS
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years)
5328 MIPS -2%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
5285 MIPS -3%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
5204 MIPS -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (3398 - 5511, n=6)
5120 MIPS -6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
4851 MIPS -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
3678 MIPS -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
2197 MIPS -60%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10321 Points +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points +31%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)
9084 Points +19%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (6854 - 8935, n=9)
7729 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7578 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
6995 Points -8%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
6778 Points -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5771 Points -24%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5402 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
4819 Points -37%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points +17%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1764 Points +17%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1727 Points +14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)
1701 Points +12%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
1640 Points +8%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1541 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1436 Points -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (926 - 1555, n=9)
1431 Points -5%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1430 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
672 Points -56%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (11.8 - 14.2, n=6)
13.1 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.6 fps
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
12.4 fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years)
11.9 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
9.68 fps -23%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
8.73 fps -31%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
7.55 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
6.92 fps -45%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
6.34 fps -50%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
120.5 s * -123%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (50.1 - 84.9, n=6)
59.2 s * -9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
54.1 s *
Average of class Subnotebook
  (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years)
52.6 s * +3%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
50.9 s * +6%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
49.3 s * +9%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
49.1 s * +9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
47.9 s * +11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
43.2 s * +20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
12.88 s * +76%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
1.236 sec * -134%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
0.732 sec * -38%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.624 sec * -18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
0.594 sec * -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
0.546 sec * -3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.529 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (0.508 - 0.529, n=5)
0.52 sec * +2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years)
0.52 sec * +2%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.4993 sec * +6%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U
0.4688 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
237 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1742 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
117.97 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Help
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
 
96.6 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
93.2 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
81.2 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
64.5 pt
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
34.5 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (10902 - 12818, n=6)
11822 KRay/s +6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11187 KRay/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years)
10054 KRay/s -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
8273 KRay/s -26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5909 KRay/s -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2882 KRay/s -74%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (67503 - 84031, n=6)
75814 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
71474 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years)
52488 Points -27%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33979 Points -52%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23248 Points -67%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
12712 Points -82%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (2296 - 2818, n=6)
2596 MB/s +6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2455 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years)
2361 MB/s -4%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2286 MB/s -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1530 MB/s -38%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1007 MB/s -59%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (62082 - 96306, n=6)
85211 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
82608 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years)
79878 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
49312 Points -40%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44677 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
29405 Points -64%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (7753 - 11982, n=6)
10823 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
10724 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years)
7617 Points -29%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4677 Points -56%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4063 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2925 Points -73%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (37417 - 45748, n=6)
41695 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39378 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years)
27533 Points -30%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
20202 Points -49%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14612 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
8608 Points -78%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
101595 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (50547 - 115681, n=6)
95178 MB/s -6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
71494 MB/s -30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years)
53217 MB/s -48%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52436 MB/s -48%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
20443 MB/s -80%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook
  (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years)
666 MB/s +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (554 - 755, n=6)
661 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
630 MB/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
384 MB/s -39%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
362 MB/s -43%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
258 MB/s -59%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (5825 - 6694, n=6)
6239 KRay/s +7%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5825 KRay/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years)
5239 KRay/s -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4454 KRay/s -24%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3272 KRay/s -44%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1816 KRay/s -69%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years)
35760 MPixel/s +43%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
33424 MPixel/s +33%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
28249 MPixel/s +13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
27619 MPixel/s +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (24728 - 27274, n=6)
26272 MPixel/s +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
25037 MPixel/s

系统性能

凭借快速的AMD处理器、16GB LPDDR5-6400内存和PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,Zenbook是一个非常强大和反应迅速的系统。合成基准测试也证实了这一点,在这些测试中,我们的评测设备几乎总是领先于竞争对手。在正常使用中也没有发现问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6346 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (5057 - 6639, n=7)
6058 Points -5%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years)
5879 Points -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5226 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
4950 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
4881 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10709 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
10492 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years)
10247 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (8143 - 10766, n=6)
9793 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
9704 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
9494 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8984 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (6089 - 9328, n=6)
8441 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years)
7857 Points -13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
6964 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
6430 Points -28%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
6352 Points -29%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (6066 - 8144, n=6)
7282 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7208 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years)
6923 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
5342 Points -26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
5304 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
5169 Points -28%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)
1553 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (1009 - 1575, n=7)
1436 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1355 Points -9%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1352 Points -9%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)
1507 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1476 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (971 - 1596, n=7)
1435 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1424 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1274 Points -14%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)
1690 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1593 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1554 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (1054 - 1686, n=7)
1486 Points -4%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1261 Points -19%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1425 Points +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)
1329 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (994 - 1473, n=7)
1302 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1004 Points -22%
PCMark 10 Score
6346 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years)
61239 MB/s +28%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
57332 MB/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
56136 MB/s +18%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
53900 MB/s +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (47010 - 52159, n=6)
50018 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
47701 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years)
57245 MB/s +45%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
56829 MB/s +44%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
55226 MB/s +40%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52798 MB/s +34%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (39197 - 45084, n=6)
42761 MB/s +9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39402 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
65335 MB/s +34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years)
64603 MB/s +33%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
58275 MB/s +20%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
54844 MB/s +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (48723 - 51117, n=6)
50328 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
48723 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
120.1 ns *
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
117 ns * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
  (106.3 - 123.1, n=6)
113 ns * +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years)
104 ns * +13%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
88.3 ns * +26%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的延迟测试中,当播放4K YouTube视频时,Zenbook没有显示任何问题,既没有延迟,也没有跳帧。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
3228 μs * -448%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1059 μs * -80%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
740 μs * -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
588.9 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

三星的M.2-2280固态硬盘的速度非常快。
三星的M.2-2280固态硬盘的速度非常快。

华硕使用了三星的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘。PM9A1(980 Pro的OEM版本)提供了1TB的存储容量,首次启动后大约有904GB可用。在基准测试中,M.2-2280硬盘实现了超过6GB/s的极高传输率,因此是目前移动领域最快的SSD之一。此外,尽管紧挨着CPU的位置有些不利,但性能仍然稳定,并不是所有拥有快速PCIe 4.0 SSD的设备都能做到这一点。更多SSD基准测试可在 这里.

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7112.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5233.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 449.11 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 515.54 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 67.08 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 152.69 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 517.14 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1559.86 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
93.5 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
77.8 pt
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
73.7 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
64.8 pt
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
53.5 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
38.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=82)
3780 MB/s +12%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3382 (3242.21min - 3381.81max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (452 - 4501, n=58, last 2 years)
2872 MB/s -15%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2237 (2200.54min - 2236.82max) MB/s -34%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
1669 (1658.05min - 1668.7max) MB/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
1469 (1284.35min - 1469.26max) MB/s -57%
seq write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=82)
3590 MB/s +13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3188 (3158.91min - 3187.67max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (153.3 - 5344, n=58, last 2 years)
2808 MB/s -12%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2131 (2095.68min - 2131.34max) MB/s -33%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1706 (1656.37min - 1706.24max) MB/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
1129 (1111.78min - 1128.74max) MB/s -65%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6654 (5007.16min - 6653.54max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=82)
6471 MB/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (558 - 7134, n=58, last 2 years)
4958 MB/s -25%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
3265 (2733.64min - 3265.24max) MB/s -51%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3261 (2825.7min - 3261.07max) MB/s -51%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
1584 (1489.82min - 1584.17max) MB/s -76%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4938 (4919.31min - 4937.74max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=82)
4809 MB/s -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (60 - 6751, n=58, last 2 years)
3775 MB/s -24%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2544 (2480.09min - 2543.64max) MB/s -48%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2527 (2511.97min - 2526.63max) MB/s -49%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
1014 (987.34min - 1013.83max) MB/s -79%
4k q1 t1 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=82)
77 MB/s +14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
67.3 (66.05min - 67.28max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12.6 - 88.6, n=58, last 2 years)
61.6 MB/s -8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
58.2 (57.45min - 58.23max) MB/s -14%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
56.5 (55.75min - 56.46max) MB/s -16%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
44.2 (42.17min - 44.2max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
261 (255.77min - 260.58max) MB/s +75%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=82)
188.1 MB/s +26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
169 (163.4min - 169.13max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.5 - 360, n=58, last 2 years)
154.8 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
149.4 (148.22min - 149.37max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
92 (90.59min - 91.98max) MB/s -38%
4k q32 t16 read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=82)
2567 MB/s +109%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
1732 (1718.36min - 1732.03max) MB/s +41%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1227 (1201.13min - 1227.26max) MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (283 - 4286, n=58, last 2 years)
1215 MB/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
814 (810.85min - 814.24max) MB/s -34%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
739 (720.09min - 739.43max) MB/s -40%
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2394 (2307.09min - 2394.3max) MB/s +373%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=82)
1938 MB/s +283%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 4189, n=58, last 2 years)
869 MB/s +72%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
749 (730.95min - 749.24max) MB/s +48%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
506 (496.78min - 506.11max) MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
469 (457.84min - 469.35max) MB/s -7%
AS SSD
Score Total
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=82)
6848 Points +23%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
5668 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5566 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (707 - 8892, n=56, last 2 years)
4437 Points -20%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
3692 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
2470 Points -56%
Score Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=82)
2415 Points +42%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2138 Points +25%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1705 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 3307, n=56, last 2 years)
1464 Points -14%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1416 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
1039 Points -39%
Score Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=82)
3269 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3101 Points
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2438 Points -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (327 - 3972, n=56, last 2 years)
2285 Points -26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1606 Points -48%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
952 Points -69%
Seq Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=82)
4909 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4664 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (508 - 5525, n=56, last 2 years)
3827 MB/s -18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
2694 MB/s -42%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2501 MB/s -46%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
2304 MB/s -51%
Seq Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=82)
3325 MB/s +53%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (386 - 4961, n=56, last 2 years)
2355 MB/s +8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2354 MB/s +8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2179 MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1407 MB/s -35%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
1042 MB/s -52%
4K Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=82)
72.5 MB/s +14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
63.64 MB/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
61 MB/s -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.8 - 96.2, n=56, last 2 years)
59.4 MB/s -7%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
54.4 MB/s -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
45.6 MB/s -28%
4K Write
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
195.8 MB/s +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=82)
186 MB/s +23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (65.5 - 256, n=56, last 2 years)
173.2 MB/s +15%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
170.7 MB/s +13%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
152.4 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
151.15 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=82)
1851 MB/s +58%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
1827 MB/s +56%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1174.58 MB/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1092 MB/s -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (187.3 - 2682, n=56, last 2 years)
1022 MB/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
763.3 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Write
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=82)
2750 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2732.34 MB/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
2032 MB/s -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 3410, n=56, last 2 years)
1873 MB/s -31%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
1269 MB/s -54%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
695.1 MB/s -75%
Access Time Read
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
0.18 ms * -683%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
0.064 ms * -178%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.021 - 0.257, n=56, last 2 years)
0.06214 ms * -170%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
0.051 ms * -122%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=81)
0.03737 ms * -62%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Subnotebook
  (0.016 - 0.523, n=56, last 2 years)
0.07618 ms * -182%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
0.062 ms * -130%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=82)
0.03445 ms * -28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.027 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
0.025 ms * +7%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Phison Electronics PS5012
0.022 ms * +19%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED: Ø6574 (5734.03-6616.08)

GPU性能

GPU-Z Radeon 680M
GPU-Z Radeon 680M

新Ryzen 6000 CPU的最大改进是集成显卡,即Radeon 680M。这是基于RDNA2架构(与目前的Radeon 6000M显卡一样),与Ryzen 7 6800U相结合,最大时钟为2.2 GHz(在H-CPU中高达2.4 GHz)。关于680M的更多技术细节可以在以下网站找到这里.

在合成基准测试中,新的Radeon 680M的速度约为旧的 RX Vega 8的前辈。即使是最快版本的 Xe Graphics G7 witt 96 EUs也明显超过了,就像专用的 NvidiaGeForce MX450.较新的 MX550仍然快一点,但差别不是很明显。然而。 Apple的7核M1-GPU更快,这也适用于OpenGL和OpenCL基准测试。

Radeon 680M的一大优势,特别是与目前Alder Lake CPU的Xe Graphics G7相比,是在视频播放过程中GPU负载非常低,这在本评论后面的电池运行时间测试中也很明显。在播放4K YouTube视频时,Radeon只使用了4-5%的容量,而目前的Xe Graphics G7使用了40%以上。

在性能模式下,苛刻的Time Spy 压力测试以97%通过,而在平衡模式下略低于90%,所以你应该预期有10%左右的性能损失。另外值得注意的是,性能模式在正常的GPU基准测试中没有带来任何优势。在电池模式下,图形性能下降了约20%。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
10331 Points +14%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (6858 - 11605, n=32)
9979 Points +10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9095 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2979 - 16904, n=55, last 2 years)
8227 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
8079 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
6954 Points -24%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
6647 Points -27%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
6174 Points -32%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
5800 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
5758 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
4895 Points -46%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6683 Points
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (3791 - 7593, n=33)
6660 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
6257 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2837 - 12349, n=59, last 2 years)
6026 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5753 Points -14%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
5479 Points -18%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
5191 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
4408 Points -34%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
4189 Points -37%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
3887 Points -42%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
3335 Points -50%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
2526 Points +10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2287 Points
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
2276 Points 0%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (1359 - 2607, n=33)
2221 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (811 - 4773, n=58, last 2 years)
2027 Points -11%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1784 Points -22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
1382 Points -40%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
1351 Points -41%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
1342 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
1285 Points -44%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1066 Points -53%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points +144%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2438 - 9340, n=24, last 2 years)
5503 Points +45%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
5048 Points +33%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4515 Points +19%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (2476 - 4497, n=7)
3812 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3793 Points
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14403 - 24885, n=4, last 2 years)
21293 Points +48%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
16159 Points +12%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (14403 - 16072, n=2)
15238 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
14403 Points
GFXBench
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps +208%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (31 - 120, n=10, last 2 years)
89.5 fps +87%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
72.4 fps +51%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
62.7 fps +31%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (47.8 - 50.6, n=2)
49.2 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.8 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps +228%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 331, n=10, last 2 years)
243 fps +103%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
192 fps +60%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
155.2 fps +29%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (120 - 121.1, n=2)
120.6 fps +1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
120 fps
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
316 fps +189%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (79 - 260, n=9, last 2 years)
185.1 fps +69%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
162 fps +48%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
153.9 fps +41%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
109.3 fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (105.6 - 109.3, n=2)
107.5 fps -2%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
NVIDIA GeForce MX550, Intel Core i7-1260P
39355 Points +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points +10%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
33149 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, Intel Core i7-1165G7
28741 Points -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
31996 Points
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (13008 - 34368, n=33)
29980 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10477 - 61067, n=66, last 2 years)
23958 Points -25%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
20391 Points -36%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
18831 Points -41%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
17029 Points -47%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U
15953 Points -50%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
15477 Points -52%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
15303 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
15269 Points -52%
3DMark 11 Performance
9140 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6154 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2548 points
Help

游戏性能

合成测试中的性能是一回事,但Radeon 680M在游戏测试中也取得了不错的成绩,明显领先于 Xe Graphics G7在大多数情况下,特别是在高图形细节方面,但 GeForce MX450仍然略快。总的来说,对于iGPU来说,性能非常好,在许多情况下,你可以在1080p下以中等或高细节进行游戏,只要标题不是太苛刻。例如,《赛博朋克2077》勉强可以玩,因为它即使在最低设置下也无法超过30 FPS。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
51 fps +28%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
43.5 fps +9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
40 fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (22.3 - 48, n=31)
37.3 fps -7%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
36 fps -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11.2 - 92, n=56, last 2 years)
34.9 fps -13%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
32 (29min) fps -20%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
28 fps -30%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.3 (23min) fps -37%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
23 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
16 fps -60%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
29 fps +26%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
23.8 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23 (19min, 22P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (14.3 - 27.1, n=31)
22.8 fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years)
18.9 fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
14.3 (13min, 13P1) fps -38%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.1 (13min, 13P1) fps -39%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
13.9 (12min) fps -40%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
12.3 (11min) fps -47%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
12.2 (11min, 11P1) fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
11 fps -52%
GTA V
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
155.6 (4.88min, 90.9P1) fps +29%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
120.4 (8.21min, 76.9P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (60.7 - 143.9, n=25)
119.1 fps -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (31 - 172.6, n=52, last 2 years)
104.1 fps -14%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
100.9 (18.3min, 66.7P1) fps -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
88.8 (13.9min, 52.6P1) fps -26%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
67.4 (14.7min, 43.5P1) fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
64.9 (6.74min, 32.3P1) fps -46%
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
77.6 (15.6min, 52.6P1) fps +65%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
50 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (25.9 - 99.1, n=28)
49.1 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
47 (6.64min, 31.3P1) fps
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10 - 121, n=51, last 2 years)
35.8 fps -24%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
26 (9.36min, 19.2P1) fps -45%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
24.9 (7.11min, 18.5P1) fps -47%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
16.2 (1.86min, 6.02P1) fps -66%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.2 (6.51min, 10.8P1) fps -70%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
115 (99.2min) fps +59%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
112 (101.3min) fps +55%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
72.3 (62.7min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (33.2 - 89.1, n=33)
71 fps -2%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
67.8 (58.8min) fps -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (37.4 - 114.4, n=58, last 2 years)
65.9 fps -9%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
57.2 (46.9min) fps -21%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
51.3 (45.6min) fps -29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
51.1 (46.2min) fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
44.7 (37min) fps -38%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
41.6 (16.9min) fps -42%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
106.7 (96.4min) fps +70%
Asus ZenBook 14X OLED UX5400EA-L7154W
Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX450
104.6 (89.4min) fps +67%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
62.7 (53.2min) fps 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
62.7 (53.2min) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (33.2 - 84.9, n=33)
62.5 fps 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (29.4 - 109.1, n=58, last 2 years)
59.6 fps -5%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
52.6 (46min) fps -16%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
47.5 (42.7min) fps -24%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1
Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
46.7 (41.8min) fps -26%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
43.4 (15.3min) fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
39.4 (32.6min) fps -37%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
44 fps +33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 79, n=37, last 2 years)
33.9 fps +3%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (18 - 41, n=24)
33.1 fps 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33 fps
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
30 fps -9%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
23 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
12 (10min) fps -64%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
40 fps +29%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (11 - 75, n=34, last 2 years)
32.6 fps +5%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (20 - 40, n=23)
32 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
31 fps
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
28 fps -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
22 fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
11 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
11 (9min) fps -65%
F1 2021
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
57.7 (50min, 42P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (26.8 - 69, n=20)
56.5 fps -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (24.4 - 120.8, n=19, last 2 years)
56.4 fps -2%
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
54.4 (42min, 40P1) fps -6%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
40.9 (35min, 32P1) fps -29%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo IdeaCentre AIO 3 24IAP7
Intel Core i7-1260P, NVIDIA GeForce MX550
30.4 (22min, 21P1) fps +23%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
29.9 (22min, 23P1) fps +21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.1 - 61.9, n=19, last 2 years)
29.4 fps +19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.7 (18min, 16P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (16.1 - 29.1, n=17)
24.2 fps -2%

在我们的Witcher 3 长时间测试中,即使在平衡模式下,游戏性能也保持稳定,但在要求较高的游戏中,短时间后会出现约10%的性能损失(与GPU压力测试类似)。在电池模式下也会出现20%左右的性能轻微下降。关于更多的游戏基准测试,我们可以参考我们的 技术部分.

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0510152025Tooltip
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M: Ø23 (21-25)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 136.1 120.4 47 21.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 123 40 23
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 111.2 96.9 72.3 62.7
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 59.8 31.6 21.9 16.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 46.9 39.7 33.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 57 36 33 31
Strange Brigade (2018) 125.1 54.7 46.6 40.2 25.3
F1 2021 (2021) 156.5 76.7 57.7 24.7 16.9
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 123 62 48 44
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 32 24 18 14

排放。带有良好扬声器的Zenbook

系统噪音

带风扇的冷却系统
带风扇的冷却系统

Zenbook S 13在日常使用中是一个非常安静的伙伴。在平衡模式下,短时间的负载峰值甚至可以在没有风扇的情况下进行管理。在游戏中,Zenbook达到了约40分贝(A),在压力测试中接近42分贝(A)。当然,风扇的噪音是可以听到的,但它绝不是令人不快或高调的。此外,在我们的评测样本中,我们没有发现任何电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。

在可选的性能模式下(仅在主电源运行时),风扇启动得更快,而且我们还观察到在负载下风扇噪音明显增大(压力测试和Witcher 3 ,均为47 dB(A))。如果你想在负载下保持安静,你应该选择耳语模式,因为在这里几乎听不到风扇的声音,只有33分贝(A)。

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 24 / 24 dB(A)
Load
33.1 / 41.7 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.52627.830.526.826.52527.428.129.130.73127.23125.825.127.932.428274028.427.831.534.630.231.95027.32725.430.723.328.16326.123.323.126.421.123.38027.122.621.721.91921.110022.622.322.320.819.618.912524.620.527.322.221.619.216020.919.625.81920.718.620019.722.122.218.820.719.525019.421.819.91816.716.931519.721.521.517.814.616.440019.925.424.617.313.515.250020.323.72316.811.615.163021.32524.216.311.115.180022.127.427.218.510.317.3100024.731.330.819.210.218.8125027.232.233.321.410.121.116003133.434.324.110.622.5200030.7373623.810.523.7250033.741.138.7251124.7315030.73934.422.411.722.540002633.532.420.411.920500025.531.730.517.912.117.4630022.730.729.315.412.414.6800019.629.127.713.812.413.51000018.326.625.513.812.412.8125001422.520.112.612.212.31600012.718.816.81212.311.6SPL40.24745.133.12432.6N2.94.84.41.60.61.4median 22.1median 26.6median 27.2median 18.5median 12.2median 17.4Delta3.35.54.82.822.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
Noise
5%
-5%
-2%
off / environment *
24
24.8
-3%
24.6
-3%
24.5
-2%
Idle Minimum *
24
25
-4%
24.6
-3%
24.5
-2%
Idle Average *
24
25
-4%
24.6
-3%
24.5
-2%
Idle Maximum *
24
25
-4%
26.3
-10%
28
-17%
Load Average *
33.1
25.3
24%
38.4
-16%
35.9
-8%
Witcher 3 ultra *
40.2
35.8
11%
35.9
11%
Load Maximum *
41.7
35.8
14%
38.7
7%
38.6
7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

Zenbook的表面温度在正常任务中完全没有问题,但在游戏或极端负荷下,你不应该把设备放在你的大腿上,因为我们偶尔会登记超过50℃的温度。在这些情况下,键盘也会强烈发热,但这并不证明对使用有限制。

由于风扇速度不同,在一小时的压力测试后,平衡模式和性能模式下的表面温度几乎是相同的。在性能模式下,TDP保持在25瓦,而平衡模式下的消耗量在测试过程中逐渐下降,最终稳定在15瓦。因此,那些需要最大性能的人应该使用性能模式。

CPU/iGPU数据压力测试(绿色:平衡,红色:性能)。
CPU/iGPU数据压力测试(绿色:平衡,红色:性能)。
Max. Load
 40.7 °C47.9 °C47 °C 
 38.8 °C47.2 °C45.8 °C 
 28.9 °C28.9 °C31.8 °C 
Maximum: 47.9 °C
Average: 39.7 °C
56.1 °C54.8 °C44.2 °C
43.2 °C41.9 °C41.3 °C
32.8 °C32.8 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 56.1 °C
Average: 42 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.1 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.8 °C / 89.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Heat
8%
4%
-1%
10%
Maximum Upper Side *
47.9
44
8%
46.6
3%
47.9
-0%
42.8
11%
Maximum Bottom *
56.1
44
22%
46
18%
51.3
9%
46.9
16%
Idle Upper Side *
26.8
27
-1%
26.6
1%
28.5
-6%
25.2
6%
Idle Bottom *
27.3
27
1%
29.2
-7%
29.6
-8%
26
5%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

Zenbook S 13的声音系统由两个模块组成,默认情况下,杜比访问应用程序的改进被激活。该应用程序有各种配置文件以及一个均衡器,允许你自己调整设置。整体效果非常令人信服:你可以毫无问题地听音乐或看视频,所以外部扬声器不是绝对必要的。由于笔记本电脑的结构,只有低音有些不足,但这也适用于大多数竞争对手。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.829.5253131.73128284030.229.85023.329.56321.128.2801932.610019.640.612521.643.816020.742.720020.748.925016.755.331514.662.840013.567.450011.668.563011.164.680010.368.7100010.268.7125010.167.9160010.665.1200010.564.125001163.5315011.757.3400011.959.5500012.158.6630012.456800012.458.81000012.461.61250012.259.51600012.361.1SPL2476.5N0.638.9median 12.2median 61.1Delta25.633.436.621.721.82020.62223.522.434.225.730.422.435.717.747.122.457.921.161.615.859.7156213.462.416.168.113.169.211.463.110.766.910.165.510.468.31168.71167.111.266.811.567.511.670.611.967.111.968.711.965.512.162.811.862.41160.623.979.60.547.3median 11.9median 65.523.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus Zenbook S 13 OLEDApple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理。Zenbook仍然经济实惠

消耗功率

65瓦的电源
65瓦的电源

高分辨率OLED屏幕 在空闲测量中让人感觉到,尽管SDR的亮度有限,但空闲消耗却增加到10瓦。在负载情况下,较低的TDP值的优势再次变得明显:与目前的英特尔笔记本电脑相比,它们往往不能从其65瓦的电源中获得足够的功率,在峰值负载期间总是不得不短暂地从电池中汲取能量,我们在Zenbook中记录的最大消耗量略低于50瓦,然后在测试过程中达到了略低于35瓦(平衡)或45瓦(性能)的水平。

因此,即使在压力测试中,65瓦的电源也有足够的规模,甚至有足够的容量为电池充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.51 / 0.65 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 4.8 / 8.7 / 10.1 Watt
Load midlight 45.6 / 49.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Phison Electronics PS5012, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Average AMD Radeon 680M
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
40%
2%
13%
1%
-20%
-7%
Idle Minimum *
4.8
1.9
60%
5.7
-19%
4.3
10%
4.2
12%
6.75 ?(2.2 - 10.8, n=30)
-41%
Idle Average *
8.7
6.4
26%
6
31%
6
31%
8.1
7%
Idle Maximum *
10.1
7
31%
12.3
-22%
8.8
13%
9
11%
Load Average *
45.6
25
45%
44.4
3%
36
21%
41.7
9%
52.8 ?(20 - 77.7, n=30)
-16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
42.4
36.5
14%
32.9
22%
40.1
5%
Load Maximum *
49.5
30.3
39%
47.8
3%
60
-21%
68
-37%
69.4 ?(48 - 103.2, n=30)
-40%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

051015202530354045Tooltip
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø42.4 (40.2-44.5)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø44.6 (42-49.5)

Power consumption with external monitor

051015202530354045Tooltip
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø37.8 (35.9-43.6)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø43.3 (42.1-44.3)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø41.5 (37.6-48)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø40 (38.6-44.9)

电池寿命

Zenbook S 13有一个67Wh的电池(4个单元),可以确保体面的运行时间。在日常使用中,OLED面板是最大的消费者,这就是为什么最大亮度对运行时间也有很大影响。例如,我们在150cd/m²(相当于最大亮度的70%)的WLAN测试中,运行时间略多于9小时。在全SDR亮度下,运行时间少了两个小时,约为7小时。

我们的HDR测试视频显示了为什么最大的HDR亮度并不总是可用:在全亮度下只能运行3小时多一点。另一个极端是我们在150cd/m²的正常视频测试,这表明新的Radeon 680M GPU的效率有多高。这里的运行时间刚刚超过15小时,我们反复检查了几次。

运行时间。全亮度下的HDR视频
运行时间。全亮度下的HDR视频
开启设备后的充电过程
开启设备后的充电过程

在笔记本电脑打开的情况下,充满电只需要2个多小时,在达到60%的标记(约41分钟)后,速度会稍微平缓下来。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 102)
9h 10min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 102)
7h 10min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 12min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 26min
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
75%
-29%
1%
-21%
-7%
H.264
912
693
-24%
661
-28%
WiFi v1.3
550
960
75%
391
-29%
695
26%
563
2%
Load
146
149
2%
94
-36%

Pros

+ 紧凑和高质量的外壳
+ 高CPU/GPU性能
+ 非常好的系统性能
+ 优秀的OLED屏幕
+ 针对PWM的软件解决方案
+ 通过BIOS更新的USB 4
+ 良好的电池寿命

Cons

- 不必要地难以接触到组件
- 720p的网络摄像头
- 电池模式下性能略有下降

结论:Zenbook是一个非常坚实的移动伴侣

在审查中。华硕Zenbook S 13 OLED。评测设备由德国AMD公司提供。
在审查中。华硕Zenbook S 13 OLED。评测设备由德国AMD公司提供。

华硕Zenbook S 13是一款非常成功的紧凑型笔记本,它结合了许多现代技术特征和全新的 Ryzen 7 6800U融合了许多现代技术特征和AMD的全新Ryzen 7 6800U。在审查过程中,我们没有遇到任何真正的弱点,我们的正面印象显然超过了负面印象。

AMD的新移动处理器在CPU领域只提供了轻微的改进,但集成的 Radeon-680M-GPU在性能上有了相当大的飞跃,甚至能够与专用的 GeForce MX450在真正的游戏基准测试中竞争。同时,该SoC的消耗率并不像目前Alder Lake芯片(不管是P系列还是U系列)那样高得离谱,这就是为什么在日常使用中风扇启动的频率要低得多。此外,65瓦的电源也完全足够。

但不仅是新的AMD芯片令人印象深刻。高质量的镁合金外壳非常紧凑,我们也喜欢输入设备,特别是键盘,因为Zenbook为一个非常薄的笔记本提供了1.4毫米的体面的键落。触摸板上的可选数字键盘也证明是有用的。端口(即使只有USB-C)是合适的,并将在未来通过BIOS更新扩展到USB 4,这将允许连接外部显卡,例如。电池寿命很好,OLED屏幕提供了非常好的图像质量,而且由于华硕的软件解决方案,面板可以调光,而不必忍受恼人的PWM闪烁。通过MyAsus应用程序进行的额外控制有些麻烦,我们希望看到与标准亮度控制更好的整合,但这是朝着正确方向迈出的一步。

新的Zenbook S 13是一款非常好的次笔记本,没有任何重大失误,并提供了很多性能。新的AMD Ryzen 7 6800U也给人留下了非常好的印象,比同类的英特尔Alder-Lake CPU工作效率高得多,使其成为目前紧凑型笔记本电脑的更好选择。

就缺点而言,我们肯定应该提到不必要的复杂的内部访问,而且1080p的网络摄像头肯定比720p的模块更符合时代要求。另一个读卡器也是可取的。但是,这些问题几乎没有影响到整体上的良好印象。相反,我们更认为可用性是一个问题,因为Zenbook还没有在商店里买到,而其他配备6800U的笔记本电脑也供不应求。

尽管功耗相对较低,但整体性能显然与Alder Lake P芯片相当,在我们的评测中,Alder Lake P芯片的功耗往往明显更高,给非常紧凑的笔记本电脑(或其冷却)带来了困难。该 三星Galaxy Book 2 Pro 13其较低的消耗率也表明,桤木湖i5-1240P在20瓦时几乎没有竞争力,而酷睿i7-1255U只在单核测试中具有优势,但它也需要相当多的电力。只要你使用所有的核心或显卡,AMD的Ryzen 7 6800U就明显领先。旧的 MacBook Air M1仍然是一个强大的竞争对手,仍然与完全更新的MacBook Air M2一起提供。尽管是被动冷却,但它提供了很多性能,因此效率更高,但显示屏不支持HDR。我们期望能够对目前的 戴尔XPS 13但根据我们之前对新英特尔芯片的研究结果,它的性能不太可能跟上Zenbook S 13。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

华硕Zenbook S 13尚未上市,无论是从华硕本身还是从通常的网上商店。建议感兴趣的买家定期在网上和供应商处查询。

Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED - 07/06/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
89 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
62 / 75 → 82%
Weight
74 / 20-75 → 98%
Battery
88%
Display
90%
Games Performance
72 / 78 → 92%
Application Performance
93 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
84%
Noise
94%
Audio
75 / 91 → 82%
Camera
31 / 85 → 36%
Average
80%
90%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 华硕Zenbook S 13 OLED笔记本电脑回顾。副笔记本以快速的AMD Ryzen 7 6800U给人留下深刻印象
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-07- 8 (Update: 2022-07- 8)