Notebookcheck

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1专业笔记本电脑评测。基础机型能得到多少 "专业"?

MagSafe,M1 Pro,Mini-LED,120赫兹和一个凹槽... Apple ,推出了新的MacBook Pro 14,配备了自己的M1 CPU以及120Hz的新Mini-LED显示屏。在一些相当不成功的实验如触摸条和蝴蝶键盘之后,Apple ,重新引入了其他功能,如SD卡读卡器和MagSafe。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple ARM Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt

在Apple"自己的M1处理器亮相一年后,来自库比蒂诺的制造商现在推出了两款更快的芯片M1 Pro以及M1 Max,同时推出了两款完全翻新的MacBook Pro 14和16。我们在发布会上订购了新MacBook Pro 14的入门级规格,尽管以2249欧元的价格谈论入门级SKU有点棘手。除了新的处理器之外,Apple ,还回到了早期MacBook Pro机型的一些设计元素。触摸条没有了,端口方面的极简主义做法似乎也是过去的事情了。仍然没有USB-A端口,但你再次得到一个全尺寸的SD卡读卡器和一个HDMI输出。14.2英寸Mini-LED屏幕(Apple 称之为Liquid Retina XDR Display)是另一个亮点,应该是非常明亮。我们想知道带有M1 Pro的新MBP 14的性能如何,以及它是否能证明比MacBook Pro 13 M1或MacBook Air M1的价格高出很多。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Processor
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 8 x - 3.2 GHz, 22 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 15 W TDP
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR5-6400
Display
14.20 inch 16:10, 3024 x 1964 pixel 254 PPI, Mini-LED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Connections
3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.5 x 312.6 x 221.2
Battery
69.9 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Apple macOS 12 Monterey
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 Speakers, 3D Audio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 67W USB‑C Power Adapter, USB‑C to MagSafe 3 cable, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.6 kg, Power Supply: 274 g
Price
2.249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

possible competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
92.7 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
1.4 kg15.6 mm13.30"2560x1600
88.6 %
10/2021
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.4 kg16.7 mm14.20"2520x1680
87.5 %
07/2021
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.8 mm14.00"2560x1440
86 %
08/2021
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8 R4000
1.3 kg16.9 mm14.00"2880x1800
85.1 %
02/2021
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.6 kg16.9 mm14.00"1920x1080

外壳 - 新的MacBook Pro已经获得了重量级的。

当你拿出新的MacBook Pro 14时,你会立即注意到它的高重量和笨重的机箱,以Apple 标准。与最近的MacBooks不同的是,该机身不是锥形的,因此机身四周的厚度基本相同。尽管与MacBook Pro 13相比,其占地面积略大MacBook Pro 13,但MacBook Pro 14显得更加庞大和密集。另一方面,基本设计没有改变,你仍然得到一个银色或太空灰的一体成型铝制机箱。除了黑色键盘外,按键之间的间距现在也是黑色的。这绝对是一个品味问题,但我们更喜欢机箱颜色的间距。你现在还可以在底板上得到一个盖有MacBook Pro字样的印章。

一旦你打开MacBook,你会立即注意到显示屏上部中心的大凹槽。据Apple ,这个凹槽有助于保持窄边框,这是一个成功的例子(屏幕与机身的比例:88%)。该显示屏还提供了更多的像素(菜单栏基本上被放在实际的16:10屏幕上),但缺口看起来并不漂亮。

机箱的稳定性以及建造质量都很好;没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音,而且你不能在任何地方凹陷机箱。纤细的盖子比较灵活,你可以用大量集中的压力在屏幕上激起涟漪,但你真的要尝试一下,在实践中应该不是问题。中央铰链的调整几乎是完美的,因为它能很好地保持显示屏的位置(也是小角度),避免晃动,但你仍然可以用一只手舒适地打开它。另一方面,最大的打开角度不是很宽松,只有135度。根据你的手臂位置,你在打字时可能还会从高底座的边缘得到印记,这可能会让人不舒服。

正如我们之前所提到的,新的MacBook Pro 14的占地面积与MacBook Pro 13相比,实际上并没有大多少。MacBook Pro 13而且高度也相当,但由于重量较高,使用起来还是感觉笨重得多。你还必须考虑到PSU的重量为276克,包括运输过程中的MagSafe 3电缆。

Size Comparison

324 mm 222 mm 16.9 mm 1.6 kg319.7 mm 220 mm 16.8 mm 1.8 kg314 mm 230 mm 16.7 mm 1.4 kg312.4 mm 221.4 mm 16.9 mm 1.3 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 15.6 mm 1.4 kg

连接性--MagSafe、HDMI和读卡器回来了

看起来Apple ,最终接受了只有USB-C端口不是真正的解决方案,因为新的MacBook Pro 14再次提供了一个MagSafe电源接口、一个全尺寸SD卡读卡器以及一个HDMI视频输出。不幸的是,后者仅限于HDMI 2.0,所以4K显示器被限制在60 Hz(HDMI 2.1:[email protected] 120 Hz或[email protected] 60 Hz)。所有三个USB-C端口都支持最新的Thunderbolt 4标准,包括DisplayPort ALT模式。如果你买了带有M1 Pro的MBP 14,你可以以高达6K和60Hz的速度驱动两个外部屏幕;带有M1 Max的MBP 14的用户可以连接两个6K屏幕(60Hz)以及另一个4K显示器(60Hz)。

通过HDMI和Thunderbolt的视频输出效果都很好,但我们确实注意到通过HDMI的一些小的性能问题,但后面会有更多介绍。在60赫兹下的4K播放在LG的现代55英寸OLED电视上运行良好,你也可以为外部屏幕激活HDR。

我们设法用外部SSD记录了超过2.5GB/s的传输率。如果你使用扩展坞,macOS中似乎仍有一个错误,将传输速率限制在USB 3.0。

MagSafe连接器一如既往地工作,小型状态LED显示电池是否正在充电或充满。编织电缆给人留下了高质量的印象,它有足够长的2米。你真的要问自己,为什么Apple ,一开始就去掉了这个连接器。也可以通过USB-C为MBP 14充电(最高100W)。

我们秘密地希望有一个千兆以太网端口,也许包括在电源适配器中,就像我们在当前的iMac M1.你至少可以使用相应的Thunderbolt适配器来连接有线网络。

右侧。SD卡读卡器,USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,USB-4,DisplayPort,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0
右侧。SD卡读卡器,USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,USB-4,DisplayPort,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0
左侧。MagSafe 3, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, USB-4, DisplayPort, Power Delivery), 3.5 mm耳机
左侧。MagSafe 3, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, USB-4, DisplayPort, Power Delivery), 3.5 mm耳机

SD卡阅读器

SD卡明显突出于机箱。
SD卡明显突出于机箱。

全尺寸的SD卡读卡器又回来了,它再次位于右侧,就像多年前MacBook Pros上的那样。当我们从UHS-II参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60)复制图片时,我们可以确定最大传输速率为122MB/s。SD卡突出于机箱(类似于旧的MacBook Pros),不适合用于永久性存储扩展。然而,我们非常肯定你会得到相应的microSD适配器,它很快就会与机箱平齐。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
  (AV PRO V60)
122 MB/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 226, n=68, last 2 years)
80.1 MB/s ∼66% -34%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 32GB)
24.94 MB/s ∼20% -80%

通信 - Wi-Fi 6仅适用于80兆赫

Apple 只实现了熟悉的Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax)和蓝牙5.0的通信标准,但我们没有得到最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准,该标准目前正成为高端设备的新标准。Apple 宣传最大传输速率可达1.2Gbps,这证实了对80MHz的限制。我们用路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120进行的标准化Wi-Fi测试确定的传输速率超过700 Mbps,这与旧的MacBook Pro 13 M1.支持160兆赫的Windows竞争者更胜一筹,甚至基于英特尔的老款MacBook在这方面也有优势。

虽然信号质量和范围都很好,而且该设备很容易保持20MB/s的下载速度,这是我们互联网连接的最大值。

Apple 仍然没有实现WWAN模块(LTE或甚至5G),而是希望你使用你的iPhone或智能手机作为一个移动热点。不幸的是,这并不总是理想的,因为笔记本电脑天线的信号质量通常更好,而且智能手机会消耗相当多的电力。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (1216min - 1530max) MBit/s ∼100% +103%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1183 (575min - 1294max) MBit/s ∼85% +72%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1030 (684min - 1188max) MBit/s ∼74% +49%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=85, last 2 years)
998 MBit/s ∼71% +45%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
900 (774min - 1005max) MBit/s ∼64% +31%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
809 MBit/s ∼58% +17%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (405 - 1750, n=101)
789 MBit/s ∼56% +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
689 (349min - 730max) MBit/s ∼49%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
649 (611min - 664max) MBit/s ∼46% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (533min - 616max) MBit/s ∼42% -16%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1542 (1327min - 1601max) MBit/s ∼100% +111%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1449 (1384min - 1511max) MBit/s ∼94% +98%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1558, n=85, last 2 years)
1086 MBit/s ∼70% +49%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1079 (989min - 1182max) MBit/s ∼70% +48%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (806min - 821max) MBit/s ∼53% +12%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (284 - 1414, n=101)
769 MBit/s ∼50% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
765 MBit/s ∼50% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
757 (378min - 806max) MBit/s ∼49% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
730 (645min - 824max) MBit/s ∼47%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
667 (636min - 696max) MBit/s ∼43% -9%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800705647824757716764725748720779769727738680673645679783724743739723705733771757696689762789705647824757716764725748720779769727738680673645679783724743739723705733771757696689762789349712706697644726730707700718697702711709642670689695688704682696640682667708679694630625Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø730 (645-824)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø677 (349-730)

网络摄像头

前面的缺口容纳了一个1080p的网络摄像头,这听起来并不是一个很大的改进,但由于更宽的光圈(f/2.0)和M1 SoC的图像处理,结果并不坏。不过,考虑到凹槽的大小,我们还是希望看到一个更好的模块,也许是iPad Pro的12MP前置摄像头。iPad Pro.中央舞台的功能,也是iPad所熟悉的,也不支持。

ColorChecker
15.9 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry: 11.17 ∆E min: 3.97 - max: 24.53 ∆E

配件和包装

MacBook Pro 14的入门级型号在发货时配备了一个67W的USB-C电源适配器,以及一条USB-C到MagSafe的电缆(2米)。你也可以用PSU为任何带有相应电缆的USB-C设备充电。Apple ,提供更强大的96W电源适配器(多出20欧元,或单独购买时为85欧元),支持对内部电池快速充电。

Apple 粉丝会很高兴在盒子里发现两个黑色的Apple 标志贴纸,这在以前是为Mac Pro机型保留的。

我们通常不谈论笔记本电脑的包装,但Apple ,为新的MacBook Pro改变了它。你现在通过前面的条状物(2.2厘米)打开棕色盒子。之后,你可以打开两边,看到MBP的实际包装。这对于最初的产品展示来说是很好的,但让人更难再次使用这个盒子。

当你打开盒子时,你几乎摧毁了这个盒子...
当你打开盒子时,你几乎摧毁了这个盒子...
...但最初的产品介绍是不错的。
...但最初的产品介绍是不错的。

维护

下部面板用五角螺丝固定,但再次有一个额外的滑块机制(在两边的中间)。你不能直接抬起盖子,而是要把它滑向前面,当你想把它放回去时,会有点麻烦。内部布局看起来不错,但你不能做任何事情,没有理由打开箱子。据我们来自iFixit的同事说的同事,更换新的MacBook Pro型号的电池比较容易,MagSafe和USB的连接器也没有焊接,所以也可以更换。

内部布局
内部布局

担保

新的MacBook Pro机型再次提供12个月的基本保修,但你可以花299欧元购买延长保修期至三年(Apple Care+ for Mac)。

输入设备 - 带有触摸ID的魔法键盘

键盘

新款MacBook Pro 14最大的变化是没有了触摸条,其可用性总是取决于软件的支持。不过对许多用户来说,这很可能只是一个噱头,许多简单的操作(如改变显示屏亮度或音量)往往需要额外的触摸。Apple ,现在回到了简单的按钮,但与目前的MacBook Air相反,它们的垂直尺寸与所有其他按键相同。键盘照明的快捷键已被替换,你现在得到了搜索、麦克风和 "请勿打扰 "的特殊按键。键盘的亮度可以通过控制中心控制,或者你只是让亮度传感器做它的工作,这真的很好。这是Apple ,即使过了很多年,仍然比Windows设备有优势,因为它们通常不允许如此精细的调整,你经常要手动激活/关闭照明。

剪刀式按键的基本机制没有改变。在与MacBook Pro 13 M1的直接比较中,按键行程似乎略微更闷。MacBook Pro 13 M1和旧的MacBook Pro 16,但按键的反馈仍然是相同的。反馈仍然非常精确,但键程仍然有限。考虑到基本单元的厚度,我们希望看到更长的行程,因为主观的打字体验实在不如许多其他高端设备(如戴尔、惠普和联想的商务笔记本或微星笔记本的SteelSeries键盘),键盘在这方面仍可改进。

右上角电源按钮中的Touch ID指纹扫描仪现在有一个额外的环,但与以前的型号相比,功能仍然是一样的。它的工作仍然完美无缺,而且使用起来非常舒适。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

触摸板

大型TrackPad与以前的MacBooks相比也没有变化,但这根本不是问题。一些Windows的竞争对手已经缩小了差距,但Apple"的TrackPad仍然是触摸板的参考。滑动能力非常好,你可以非常精确地控制光标,而且由于与操作系统的完美结合,手势的效果非常好。Apple ,它的MacBook仍然没有配备触摸屏。

凹槽

屏幕顶部的凹槽通常会是显示部分的一部分,但我们认为它应该有自己的章节。就像在iPhone一样,你可能会在一段时间后习惯它,但我们认为这个小黑条看起来不是很好。还有一些必须解决的功能问题。

凹槽旁边的区域基本上是为菜单栏保留的,凹槽的区域不应该被菜单项使用。然而,看起来有些应用程序还不知道这一点,iStat的菜单就是一个例子。当你在全屏模式下使用应用程序时,菜单栏会自动变黑,所以你几乎拥有标准的16:10面板。这在Apple"自己的应用程序(如Safari)中运行良好,但(颇具讽刺意味的是)Apple"自己的新闻简报的会议应用程序使用了完整的显示尺寸,上面的图标不再可见。Apple ,为自己以及开发人员创造了额外的和不必要的工作。

凹槽在日常使用中非常明显。
凹槽在日常使用中非常明显。
当你在全屏模式下使用应用程序时,菜单栏会逐渐消失...
当你在全屏模式下使用应用程序时,菜单栏会逐渐消失...
...当你把光标移到它上面时,就会重新出现。
...当你把光标移到它上面时,就会重新出现。

显示屏 - 液体视网膜XDR Mini-LED,120 Hz

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Apple 传统上使用非常好的显示屏,新的MacBook Pro 14也不例外。新的Liquid Retina XDR屏幕的主观质量印象实在是令人惊讶。与OLED面板一样,Mini-LED屏幕可以管理极低的黑值,从而产生非常高的对比度。3024 x 1964像素的分辨率也确保了14.2英寸屏幕上的图片清晰而生动(254 ppi)。

我们已经 报道了新面板的亮度,因为Apple ,在其规格表中只列出了HDR内容的亮度值。我们可以确认,在相应的HDR内容下,该面板的最大亮度为1607尼特,一直到APL为50(平均画面水平;明亮和黑暗内容的均匀分布),在完全白色的屏幕上仍然超过1100尼特(至少是16:9视频,顶部和底部有小黑条)。而且HDR图像确实令人印象深刻,适合的内容看起来就很惊人,HDR能力(除了屏幕尺寸)可以与好的电视相媲美。

然而,这在日常情况下没有帮助,因为你在大部分时间都使用SDR内容。当一个应用程序(如Safari与相应的YouTube视频或Final Cut的预览屏幕)要求时,显示器将提供更高的HDR亮度水平。但除此之外,亮度被限制在500尼特,因此类似于较小的MacBook Pro 13 M1.你仍然受益于大幅提高的对比度,但我们认为Apple 应该在官方规格中提到这一点。否则,如果你期望所有内容的亮度都能达到1000尼特,那么你可能会感到失望,例如,当你想在户外工作时。

HDR内容的最大亮度。1607尼特
HDR内容的最大亮度。1607尼特
视角稳定
视角稳定

集成的亮度传感器和TreuTone技术(根据环境光线自动调整色温)工作得非常好,你很快就会习惯这些舒适的功能。一些Windows设备也支持色温的自动调整,但这些系统往往不能像Apple"的设备那样工作。

由于采用了Mini-LED技术,没有背光渗漏;即使在最大亮度下,黑色画面也是完全黑色的。对视角的稳定性也没有限制。然而,Mini-LED技术仍然有它的问题。就像在 iPad Pro的Mini-LED屏幕一样,我们可以在所有亮度水平上检测到持续的PWM闪动。这个频率非常高,对大多数用户来说应该不是问题,但如果你对闪烁非常敏感,你会对这个屏幕不是很满意。顺便说一下,我们也可以在最大HDR亮度下检测到PWM。响应时间也相当慢,但持续的PWM闪烁使得确定确切的数值很棘手。主观上,我们可以说,重影并不像在响应时间同样缓慢的Windows笔记本电脑上那样明显。也许120赫兹的刷新率在一定程度上减少了重影。

462
cd/m²
482
cd/m²
473
cd/m²
485
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
479
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 489 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 479 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 494 cd/m²
Contrast: 48900:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
99.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Lenovo LEN8A90, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
AU Optronics B140HAN06.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Display
-32%
-2%
-23%
-30%
Display P3 Coverage
99.3
67.8
-32%
97.2
-2%
76
-23%
69.03
-30%
sRGB Coverage
98.3
99.9
100
99.09
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.1
85.4
75.6
70.99
Response Times
259%
57%
73%
1%
-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)
48 ?(18.8, 29.2)
18%
37.6 ?(18.8, 18.8)
36%
16.4 ?(8, 8.4)
72%
37 ?(16, 21)
37%
56.4 ?(30, 26.4)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)
25.2 ?(8.4, 16.8)
38%
21.6 ?(10.8, 10.8)
47%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
73%
15 ?(5, 10)
63%
46 ?(24.4, 21.6)
-14%
PWM Frequency
14880
122000 ?(49)
720%
27780 ?(40)
87%
300 ?(40)
-98%
Screen
-396%
-351%
-520%
-508%
-388%
Brightness middle
489
510
4%
419
-14%
331.1
-32%
392
-20%
361.8
-26%
Brightness
479
491
3%
407
-15%
318
-34%
390
-19%
351
-27%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
93
-1%
91
-3%
80
-15%
90
-4%
Black Level *
0.01
0.29
-2800%
0.23
-2200%
0.36
-3500%
0.29
-2800%
0.28
-2700%
Contrast
48900
1759
-96%
1822
-96%
920
-98%
1352
-97%
1292
-97%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.8
1.3
-63%
1.9
-138%
2.25
-181%
3.4
-325%
1.44
-80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.3
3
-131%
3.6
-177%
4.62
-255%
6.41
-393%
3.3
-154%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.1
2
-82%
2.9
-164%
1.7
-55%
5.44
-395%
1.3
-18%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.14 103%
2.3 96%
2.44 90%
2.15 102%
CCT
6933 94%
6733 97%
6751 96%
6013 108%
6411 101%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.3
69.1
64.9
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
99.3
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.9
3.44
1.24
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-69% / -217%
-109% / -222%
-150% / -365%
-177% / -340%
-141% / -286%

* ... smaller is better

Apple ,每台显示器都在工厂进行了校准,在我们使用专业的CalMAN软件以及X-Rite i2 Pro 2分光光度计进行分析之后,我们可以证实这一说法。灰度和色彩的DeltaE-2000偏差在开箱后就已经很小了(与DCI-P3参考色彩空间相比),这意味着人眼无法看到与参考色彩的差异。该面板完全覆盖了DCI-P3参考色,我们无法通过自己的校准来提高性能,这就是为什么我们在这一点上不提供校准配置文件。这意味着你可以立即开始编辑图片和视频。

CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。

新的MacBook Pro机型支持Apple's Pro Motion技术,刷新率最高可达120 Hz。系统会自动决定何时提高刷新率,比如当你滚动浏览文件时,而对于静态图像则降低刷新率以节省电力。如果需要,你还可以设置一个固定的频率(60、59.94、50、48或47.95赫兹)。该系统在实践中运行良好,但还不是所有的应用程序都支持它(甚至是Apple"自己的Safari浏览器)。

在MacBook Pro 14的Mini-LED面板上也可以看到绽放(黑暗图像上明亮元素周围的光晕效果)。下面的视频稍微增强了这个问题,但在其他方面很好地表现了人眼在面板最大亮度下看到的情况。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.8 ms rise
↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 30.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21061 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

MacBook Pro 14的屏幕表面是光面的,但它不像许多带有触摸屏的Windows设备那样会反光。MacBook还得益于良好的亮度和极高的对比度,因此只要你能减少直接光源或墙壁等明亮物体的反射,你仍然可以在明亮的环境中舒适地工作。

室外(阴天
室外(阴天
室外(阴天
室外(阴天
室外(阴天
室外(阴天
室外(阴天
室外(阴天
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下
在户外(阳光下

性能--M1 Pro和PCIe 4.0

Apple 为MacBook Pro 14提供不同版本的M1 Pro或M1 Max SoC,它们在CPU以及GPU核心方面有所不同。这些核心本身与普通的M1 SoC基本相同,例如MacBook Air中就有这种SoC。因此,在日常情况下,你不会注意到MacBook Air M1和M1之间有任何显著的性能差异。MacBook Air M1MacBook Pro 13 M1或MacBook Pro 14。

SoC CPU Cores GPU Cores RAM 附加价格
M1 Pro 2个效率核心和6个性能核心 14 16或32GB 2个效率核心和6个性能核心。
M1 Pro 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 14 16或32GB 230欧元
M1 Pro 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 16 16或32GB 270欧元
M1 Max 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 24 32或64 GB 500欧元
M1 Max 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 32 32或64GB 730欧元

Apple ,由于多芯片版本,可以提高产量,因为所有M1 Pro芯片,例如,基本上是相同的。你得到的CPU有一个效率集群(2个核心)和两个性能集群(每个4个核心)。基本模型只是没有使用两个性能核心。因此,所有其他版本(包括M1 Max芯片)的CPU性能几乎相同,最大的区别是GPU性能。M1 Pro芯片有两个GPU集群,每个有8个核心,其中两个在14核心型号上被停用。

只有当你能使用额外的GPU性能和/或需要超过32GB的内存时,配备M1 Max的MacBook Pro 14才有意义。甜蜜点应该是具有10个CPU核心和16个GPU核心的完整版M1 Pro。

处理器 - 具有8个CPU核心的M1 Pro

GeekBench信息
GeekBench信息

正如我们提到的,新的CPU架构的基本 M1 Pro的基本CPU架构与普通的 M1 SoC我们从去年开始知道的。性能核心的运行频率高达3.2 GHz(效率核心高达2064 MHz),因此所有新的M1 Pro和M1 Max芯片的单核性能与旧的M1几乎相同。可能有一些应用程序会从更大的缓存和额外的内存中受益,但我们在做基准测试时没有注意到。性能非常好,所以这不是问题,但你应该知道,配备新的M1 Max的MacBook Pro 14不比MacBook Air M1在某些情况下,价格约为1000欧元。

在多核测试中,我们可以看到额外性能核心的好处,入门级的M1 Pro比M1快约20-25%,而拥有10个核心的M1 Pro(在MacBook Pro 16中测试)又快了30%。

有AMD和英特尔的CPU提供了更多的性能,但它们也需要更多的线程来实现同样的性能,而Apple'的SoC要高效得多。在单核测试中,全封装功率仅为7W(CPU核心为4W),在多核测试中仅为24.7W(CPU核心为~21W)。然而,看起来CPU集群消耗的功率与拥有10个内核的M1 Pro相同,它提供了更多的性能。

我们使用Cinebench R23 Multi结果(在M1 Pro MacBook上原生运行)进行比较。单核性能与目前英特尔Tiger Lake CPU和AMD的Zen 3芯片相当,但它们需要更多的功率(英特尔~20W @Core i7-1185G7 ;AMD~15W @Ryzen 7 5800U )。在多核测试中的优势较小,因为Ryzen 7 5800U(有16个线程)需要27W的功率才能获得类似的结果,而你必须采取英特尔的H系列CPU,如i7-11800H ,在ThinkPad P1 G4 ,以37W运行。

M1 Pro的性能很稳定,无论是在持续的工作负荷下还是在电池供电的情况下,风扇的噪音在纯粹的CPU负荷下只是一个安静的杂音。这里列出了更多的CPU基准测试Mobile Processors - Benchmark List

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

010521031542052563073584094510501155126013651470157516801785189019951314.671313.241315.531312.811314.581315.571314.671319.741313.631312.211305.361308.91309.591307.921308.131308.261304.721309.461308.31305.991310.321303.741311.131310.231312.291064.031068.351066.521063.941069.61067.261066.71067.521064.761066.441064.961067.181065.11065.561066.71066.271066.71066.811065.641065.811066.671062.051063.351067.181063.041066.441064.911065.051065.671064.881066.131065.641067.831066.891064.081065.331062.561067.071065.71066.351065.391066.841065.931065.051065.11067.291063.631066.181065.931066.551054.521027.191039.371034.291035.681041.81040.611041.261041.421038.131036.221036.751039.151037.81041.121037.321036.031039.961031.811039.961040.11037.881035.731036.431034.182009.652044.892051.492051.182051.812048.552055.392054.552054.442054.552052.862051.812057.612053.282056.342051.392048.452053.072052.972048.242048.242050.132056.132052.862051.492060.792052.762051.492056.032050.972056.342055.392056.242055.922050.232052.762056.452051.282051.182051.072056.242052.972054.652056.242056.032055.822053.182051.62053.392057.511925.021921.691915.531930.691931.061929.011894.031918.11921.61934.141936.391929.571924.371923.721927.81926.041922.521923.171928.731933.861932.181920.491916.531917.641922.061918.561920.311906.941890.811883.951878.21875.291863.51801.561852.371836.551841.111830.831827.41838.15936.79918903.73905.98906.29906.6903.73906.93906.29904.73904.04908.55910.17903.73909.5906.29905.35907.26903.73906.93907.91907.26907.91905.33907.26907.91910.17906.93906.95901.81907.89906.62906.93903.73902.49901.51907.89904.06909.5905.98908.22905.96905.98906.93904.36908.55905904.08905.65906.621674.91678.351676.521684.071682.091681.521680.811675.61681.241681.11683.011674.551677.991676.941681.171678.491677.781679.611683.791679.681680.111677.641680.251675.881678.561681.871685.271684.851690.121688.261687.191686.341682.791686.411685.91741.3725.23748.83755.4752.79761.08753.38760.95760.02753.74760.24759.84760.59761.24761.21760.14759.5762.01762.56755.56764.82763.59760.53759.79760.36761.69765.86760.64765.89766.2757.35766.12766.17766.31766.17765.14767.31768.15767.75766.31764.96763.45767.42767.19764.161435140713861396139814011401140614071405140214031409140714081407140914081409140314051409141014081405140614111408140714101405140614081406140614021407141414131403140214131405140914091401140714071404141114091405140714111406140314081405140514071410140914071362.311326.261311.391314.061314.581305.441269.121297.231275.921295.171271.51304.81284.231295.881279.061297.351280.71297.731283.611310.491270.081300.471268.871298.741283.94Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1: Ø1066 (1062.05-1069.6)
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø1038 (1027.19-1054.52)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2052 (2009.65-2060.79)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø1902 (1801.56-1936.39)
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø907 (901.51-936.79)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro: Ø1681 (1674.55-1690.12)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen Intel Core i5-1038NG7: Ø761 (725.23-768.15)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: ---
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total Score
Octane V2: Total Score
CPU Performance Rating
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
91.9 pt ∼92%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
85.5 pt ∼86%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
85.5 pt ∼86%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
81 pt ∼81%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 -3!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
77.6 pt ∼78%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
75.7 pt ∼76%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
73.7 pt ∼74%
Average of class Multimedia
 
64.1 pt ∼64%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA -4!
Intel Core i7-1165G7
58.8 pt ∼59%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M -2!
Intel Core i9-9880H
57.8 pt ∼58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen -2!
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
52.3 pt ∼52%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12652 (12516min - 12651.7max) Points ∼100% +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points ∼98% +29%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12109 Points ∼96% +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points ∼76%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
9581 Points ∼76% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
8758 Points ∼69% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
8747 (8681.12min - 8746.74max) Points ∼69% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
7811 Points ∼62% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 13205, n=66, last 2 years)
7441 Points ∼59% -22%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
6612 Points ∼52% -31%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5827 (1104.73min - 5827.22max) Points ∼46% -39%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
1531 Points ∼100% 0%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1518 Points ∼99% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
1513 Points ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1498 Points ∼98% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1556, n=61, last 2 years)
1356 Points ∼88% -11%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1345 Points ∼88% -12%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1218 Points ∼79% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1140 Points ∼74% -26%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2061 (2009.65min - 2060.79max) Points ∼100% +56%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1936 Points ∼94% +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points ∼82% +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1435 (1401min - 1435max) Points ∼70% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1362 (1268.87min - 1362.31max) Points ∼66% +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points ∼64%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
1320 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=113, last 2 years)
1093 Points ∼53% -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
1070 (1060min - 1070max) Points ∼52% -19%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1055 (1027.19min - 1054.52max) Points ∼51% -20%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
936.79 (901.51min - 936.79max) Points ∼45% -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
768 (720min - 768max) Points ∼37% -42%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
237 Points ∼100% +13%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
233 Points ∼98% +11%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
226.73 Points ∼96% +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points ∼89%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
210 Points ∼89% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points ∼88% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
208 Points ∼88% -1%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
197 Points ∼83% -6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 242, n=97, last 2 years)
195 Points ∼82% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼78% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼78% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
169 Points ∼71% -20%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points ∼100% +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points ∼80%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
9942 Points ∼80% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
7590 Points ∼61% -24%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7370 Points ∼59% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
7109 Points ∼57% -28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 12708, n=87, last 2 years)
5993 Points ∼48% -40%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
5985 Points ∼48% -40%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
4564 Points ∼37% -54%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
1769 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
1740 Points ∼98% -2%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
1588 Points ∼90% -10%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1535 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1782, n=87, last 2 years)
1369 Points ∼77% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
1265 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1115 Points ∼63% -37%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
213.5 Points ∼100% +3%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
208 Points ∼97% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
207.9 Points ∼97%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
193.5 Points ∼91% -7%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
191.762 Points ∼90% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
177.5 Points ∼83% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (121 - 215, n=26, last 2 years)
169 Points ∼79% -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
142.9 Points ∼67% -31%
WebXPRT 3 /
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
343 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
343 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
342 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
281 Points ∼82% -18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
279 Points ∼81% -19%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
264 Points ∼77% -23%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
242 Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (137 - 350, n=84, last 2 years)
232 Points ∼68% -32%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
213 Points ∼62% -38%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼54% -46%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
180 Points ∼52% -48%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
905 ms * ∼100% -122%
Average of class Multimedia
  (404 - 1225, n=96, last 2 years)
769 ms * ∼85% -89%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
764 ms * ∼84% -88%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
753.9 ms * ∼83% -85%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
723 ms * ∼80% -78%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
621 ms * ∼69% -53%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
604 ms * ∼67% -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
515.9 ms * ∼57% -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
407.2 ms * ∼45%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
407 ms * ∼45% -0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
405.4 ms * ∼45% -0%
Octane V2 / Total Score
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Core i7-11370H
68903 Points ∼100% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
66203 Points ∼96% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
65528 Points ∼95%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
 
65528 Points ∼95% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
62113 Points ∼90% -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5561 - 68406, n=31, last 2 years)
49217 Points ∼71% -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Intel Core i5-1038NG7
45151 Points ∼66% -31%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1320 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
91.84 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Help

系统性能

与采用M1处理器的小型MacBook机型一样,MBP 14是一个非常快速和反应灵敏的系统。通过Rosetta 2对应用程序的模拟也非常好(尽管可能有一些应用程序存在较多问题)。新的MacBook Pro 14主要是为内容创作者和程序员准备的,但你真的应该考虑一下你实际需要多少性能,以及你是否使用更快的M1 Pro或M1 Max可能更好。很难量化这些情况下的性能差异,因为每个用户的工作负荷都不同,而且没有那么多针对macOS的基准测试。BlackMagic测试显示,CPU的性能比旧的MBP 13采用英特尔i5 CPU,而在MacBook Pro 16中带有核心的M1 Pro有30%左右的优势,但普通的Apple M1 SoC则慢了约20%。另一方面,GPU的性能与老款相比明显要好得多MacBook Pro 16专用的Radeon Pro 5500M和M1的GPU也慢了约60%,而新MacBook Pro 16的16核GPU则有23%的优势。

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Average of class Multimedia
  (133 - 202, n=3, last 2 years)
166 fps ∼100% +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
163 fps ∼98% +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
133 fps ∼80%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
133 fps ∼80% 0%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512
56 fps ∼34% -58%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512
55 fps ∼33% -59%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
48 fps ∼29% -64%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F
21 fps ∼13% -84%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
39 fps ∼100% +86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
27 fps ∼69% +29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21 - 29, n=3, last 2 years)
25.7 fps ∼66% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F
23 fps ∼59% +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
21 fps ∼54%
Average Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
21 fps ∼54% 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512
17 fps ∼44% -19%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512
17 fps ∼44% -19%

存储设备

Apple 现在使用具有更快的PCIe 4.0接口的SSD。我们的入门级机型配备了512GB的驱动器,在初始设置后,你可以使用465GB。在基准测试中,传输率达到5GB/s以上;MacBook Pro 16中较大的1TB固态硬盘具有类似的读取速度,但写入速度更快。你可以获得MacBook Pro 14的高达8TB的固态硬盘存储,但额外的价格很高。从512GB跳到1TB需要230欧元,而升级到8TB则需要2760欧元的高额费用。更多的SSD基准测试可在 我们的技术部分.

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
5447.5 MB/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
5334 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512
2820.4 MB/s ∼52% -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
2797.6 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
2756 MB/s ∼51% -49%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F
2049 MB/s ∼38% -62%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
5888 MB/s ∼100% +32%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
4462.5 MB/s ∼76%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0512
2863.7 MB/s ∼49% -36%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
2431 MB/s ∼41% -46%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2020 2GHz i5 10th-Gen
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1038NG7, Apple SSD SM0512F
2314 MB/s ∼39% -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
2193.5 MB/s ∼37% -51%

GPU性能 - 14个GPU核心

与处理器方面一样,拥有14或16个GPU核心的M1 Pro版本在技术上是相同的。它们有两个GPU集群,每个集群有8个核心,但入门级型号每个集群只使用7个核心。最大功耗为15W,无论是在持续工作负荷下还是在电池电量下,性能都再次稳定。

纯粹的GPU性能比拥有16个GPU核心的M1 Pro慢12-13%左右,但明显比普通的Apple M1快(慢~45%)。旧的Radeon Pro 5500MMacBook Pro 16也明显被击败,考虑到低TDP,这令人印象深刻。你可以粗略地将14核M1 Pro GPU与GeForce GTX 1650,后者消耗的功率要大得多(~40W)。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
97 pt ∼97%
Average of class Multimedia
 
89.4 pt ∼89%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
87 pt ∼87%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
87 pt ∼87%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M -4!
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
57.7 pt ∼58%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 -5!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
51.4 pt ∼51%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) -2!
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
46.9 pt ∼47%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) -2!
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
46.6 pt ∼47%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
41.9 pt ∼42%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA -5!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
31.8 pt ∼32%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5 -3!
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
30.1 pt ∼30%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10352 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1765 - 20228, n=7, last 2 years)
9362 Points ∼90% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points ∼90%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
9267 Points ∼90% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4423 Points ∼43% -52%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2374 Points ∼23% -74%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10351 Points ∼100% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9089 Points ∼88%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
9089 Points ∼88% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1824 - 18779, n=7, last 2 years)
8970 Points ∼87% -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4062 Points ∼39% -55%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2371 Points ∼23% -74%
Geekbench 5.3
Metal Score 5.3
Average of class Multimedia
  (37319 - 67868, n=4, last 2 years)
51373 Points ∼100% +38%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
42115 Points ∼82% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
37319 Points ∼73%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
37319 Points ∼73% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
21951 Points ∼43% -41%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
20411 Points ∼40% -45%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
19064 Points ∼37% -49%
OpenCL Score 5.3
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
37867 Points ∼100% +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points ∼93%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
35173 Points ∼93% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4576 - 108378, n=76, last 2 years)
28909 Points ∼76% -18%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
19451 Points ∼51% -45%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
19078 Points ∼50% -46%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
18352 Points ∼48% -48%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
17029 Points ∼45% -52%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
16885 Points ∼45% -52%
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
12045 Points ∼32% -66%
GFXBench
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
166 fps ∼100% +13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.4 - 310, n=6, last 2 years)
153 fps ∼92% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps ∼89%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
147 fps ∼89% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
94.7 fps ∼57% -36%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
81.2 fps ∼49% -45%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
78.2 fps ∼47% -47%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
72.4 fps ∼44% -51%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
436 fps ∼100% +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (33.6 - 752, n=6, last 2 years)
395 fps ∼91% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps ∼90%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
394 fps ∼90% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
254 fps ∼58% -36%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
214.4 fps ∼49% -46%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
207 fps ∼47% -47%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
192 fps ∼44% -51%

游戏性能

在MacOS上,游戏仍然是一个棘手的话题。现在已经有一些原生游戏(如《夏娃在线》、《魔兽世界》),有些游戏是通过Rosetta 2模拟的。我们经常使用外部屏幕进行基准测试,因为内部显示器的分辨率很不常见,而且你往往不能选择传统的16:9分辨率。我们注意到,当我们通过HDMI连接外部屏幕时,出现了更多的停顿,而且性能也有点低。到目前为止,我们没有找到原因,但通过Thunderbolt的体验明显更顺畅。显然,你也可以使用Apple's Arcade游戏集,这些游戏运行得很完美。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020
Intel Core i9-10910, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
105 fps ∼100% +98%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
57 (45min) fps ∼54% +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
54 (46min) fps ∼51% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps ∼50%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
53 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10 - 105, n=26, last 2 years)
45.7 fps ∼44% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
23 fps ∼22% -57%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020
Intel Core i9-10910, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
114 fps ∼100% +97%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
63 (48min) fps ∼55% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
58 (48min) fps ∼51% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
58 fps ∼51%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
58 fps ∼51% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 107, n=25, last 2 years)
50.2 fps ∼44% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25 fps ∼22% -57%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020
Intel Core i9-10910, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
89 fps ∼100% +93%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
50 (37min) fps ∼56% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
46 (38min) fps ∼52% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
46 fps ∼52%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
46 fps ∼52% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 92, n=26, last 2 years)
40.2 fps ∼45% -13%
1280x720 Lowest Preset
Apple iMac 27 Mid 2020
Intel Core i9-10910, AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (Desktop)
158 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
122 fps ∼77%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
122 fps ∼77% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
120 (86min) fps ∼76% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (19 - 140, n=25, last 2 years)
91.1 fps ∼58% -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
66 fps ∼42% -46%
Borderlands 3
1280x720 Very Low Overall Quality (DX11)
Average of class Multimedia
  (39.3 - 128, n=14, last 2 years)
74.2 fps ∼100% +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
61.9 fps ∼83%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
61.9 fps ∼83% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
56.6 fps ∼76% -9%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
54 fps ∼73% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
30.4 fps ∼41% -51%
1920x1080 Medium Overall Quality (DX11)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
48 fps ∼100% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
39.4 fps ∼82%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
39.4 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.9 - 69.2, n=13, last 2 years)
39.4 fps ∼82% 0%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
33 fps ∼69% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
20.3 fps ∼42% -48%
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
41.4 fps ∼100% +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
34.8 fps ∼84% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
31.9 fps ∼77%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
31.9 fps ∼77% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.8 - 79.8, n=14, last 2 years)
31.2 fps ∼75% -2%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
20 fps ∼48% -37%
1920x1080 Badass Overall Quality (DX11)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
30.8 fps ∼100% +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
26.2 fps ∼85% +9%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9 - 71.6, n=13, last 2 years)
25.9 fps ∼84% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
24.1 fps ∼78%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
24.1 fps ∼78% 0%
Total War: Three Kingdoms
1280x720 Low (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
175 (116min) fps ∼100% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
171 fps ∼98%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
171 fps ∼98% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (50.9 - 201, n=14, last 2 years)
118 fps ∼67% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
114 fps ∼65% -33%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
100 fps ∼57% -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
93.4 fps ∼53% -45%
1920x1080 Medium (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
69.6 fps ∼100% +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
64.1 (55min) fps ∼92% +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
58 fps ∼83%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
58 fps ∼83% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.3 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
44.5 fps ∼64% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
33 fps ∼47% -43%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
33 fps ∼47% -43%
1920x1080 High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
43.8 fps ∼100% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
40.5 (34min) fps ∼92% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
36 fps ∼82%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
36 fps ∼82% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.8 - 80, n=14, last 2 years)
26.6 fps ∼61% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
20.6 fps ∼47% -43%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
20 fps ∼46% -44%
1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
31.8 fps ∼100% +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
29.7 (24min) fps ∼93% +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
27 fps ∼85%
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
27 fps ∼85% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.5 - 59, n=13, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼63% -26%
Apple iMac 24 M1 2021
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
15 fps ∼47% -44%
Witcher 3 (Steam)在高细节上运行良好(HairWorks必须被停用)。
Witcher 3 (Steam)在高细节上运行良好(HairWorks必须被停用)。

你也有其他选择,可以在Mac上运行Windows游戏。除了Parallels之外,还有CrossOver,它的兼容性有限,但应用程序可以使用Mac的所有资源(Parallels则不然)。)你必须做一些实验,但我们设法玩《侠盗猎车手5》(正常设置)和Witcher 3 (高设置,没有Nvidia Hair Works),没有大问题。另一方面,《F1 2020》只能以低细节运行,更高的设置导致了大量的图形问题。我们无法提供这些游戏的标准基准,因为我们仍然需要找到一个可靠的方法来捕捉fps数字。

GTA V的Steam版也可以通过CrossOver运行。
GTA V的Steam版也可以通过CrossOver运行。
它在中等设置下运行良好。
它在中等设置下运行良好。
low med. high ultraQHD
Civilization VI (2016) 120 72 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 122 58 53 46 30 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 171 58 36 27 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 61.9 39.4 31.9 24.1 fps
F1 2020 (2020) 65 fps

排放 - 安静的风扇和出色的扬声器

风扇噪音

两个风扇中的一个。
两个风扇中的一个。

Apple ,传统上喜欢更安静的风扇,但要牺牲更高的温度。MacBook Pro 14的两个风扇的最大速度分别为5779 rpm(左)和6241 rpm(右)。在日常情况下,你永远不会听到超过一个安静的杂音,风扇甚至经常完全停用。到3800转/分左右,我们只能测到大约30分贝(A),即使是纯粹的CPU或GPU负载和游戏时的前夕,我们也常常只能测到大约27分贝(A),这意味着MacBook Pro 14几乎听不到声音。只有当你以43.1-49.5 dB(A)同时对CPU和GPU施加压力时,风扇才会变得响亮,但当负载序列结束时,风扇速度迅速降低。我们没有听到任何电子噪音,如线圈啸叫。

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
Vega 8 R4000, R9 5900HX, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N
Noise
-12%
-5%
-12%
-4%
-9%
off / environment *
24.8
29.2
-18%
24.3
2%
25.1
-1%
26
-5%
26.3
-6%
Idle Minimum *
24.8
29.2
-18%
24.3
2%
25.2
-2%
26
-5%
26.5
-7%
Idle Average *
24.8
29.2
-18%
24.3
2%
25.2
-2%
26.5
-7%
26.5
-7%
Idle Maximum *
24.8
29.2
-18%
28.4
-15%
25.2
-2%
27.4
-10%
26.5
-7%
Load Average *
27.8
32.1
-15%
31.7
-14%
31
-12%
35
-26%
26.7
4%
Witcher 3 ultra *
27.8
31.7
-14%
44
-58%
40.7
-46%
Load Maximum *
49.5
41.9
15%
46.8
5%
51.7
-4%
34.6
30%
45.6
8%

* ... smaller is better

Noise Level

Idle
24.8 / 24.8 / 24.8 dB(A)
Load
27.8 / 49.5 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.8 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.532.730.534.832.629.430.235.42531.431.632.93531.830.931.736.73127.131.92630.523.72625.833.74031.43124.932.329.630.632.234503032.327.227.129.926.627.528.16328.330.325.325.628.525.124.526.48022.223.622.223.923.623.323.124.110021.224.321.622.523.523.123.32412519.824.219.323.322.121.921.923.216019.922.617.922.12221.820.122.320020.726.521.823.923.922.121.522.625018.824.617.820.821.620.818.82031518.32617.518.723.122.517.618.440016.627.616.517.32523.514.916.150017.730.317.416.425.224.213.715.36301630.716.914.927.524.41415.180018.334.219.815.52928.111.214.9100017.835.4201530.729.911.113.9125016.535.518.614.230.429.610.713.31600183920.815.233.832.812.213.920001639.918.813.434.23311.212.9250015.742.318.713.23634.611.612.4315012.738.714.212.132.130.211.712.3400012.738.312.712.129.6281212.8500012.33712.312.228.926.912.212.9630012.535.412.412.423.420.412.413800012.529.712.512.517.916.312.512.71000012.825.212.412.615.414.312.612.91250012.622.812.312.313.913.312.512.71600012.516.111.811.812.412.311.912.6SPL27.849.529.426.443.141.824.826N0.96.21.10.83.83.30.60.8median 16.5median 30.3median 17.5median 14.9median 25median 23.5median 12.5median 13.9Delta3.362.83.5442.33.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry

温度

在日常情况下,MacBook Pro 14的机箱几乎没有升温。然而,更多的CPU或GPU负载,很快就会导致温度升高,特别是中央键盘部分。这也是防御性风扇曲线的结果,我们在游戏过程中测量了最高温度,与我们的压力测试相比,风扇速度较低。而且你会注意到键盘上约48℃的温度是相当不舒服的。另一方面,底部面板保持较低的温度,略高于40℃,所以你仍然可以在腿上使用MacBook Pro。我们的压力测试显示,CPU的功耗在19.21W之间略有波动(效率核心:~2GHz,性能核心:~2.8-2.9GHz),而GPU则保持在15W满分。整体封装功率在43-46W之间略有波动,但总体上仍然非常稳定。

Max. Load
 39.6 °C46.5 °C38.5 °C 
 38.9 °C46.8 °C39.2 °C 
 29.7 °C28 °C29.8 °C 
Maximum: 46.8 °C
Average: 37.4 °C
40.2 °C40.9 °C40.4 °C
38.6 °C40.5 °C37.5 °C
30.9 °C32.5 °C31.4 °C
Maximum: 40.9 °C
Average: 37 °C
Power Supply (max.)  46.7 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.2 °C / -9.4 F).
闲置(顶部
闲置(顶部
Witcher 3 (顶部
Witcher 3 (顶部
压力测试(顶部
压力测试(顶部
闲置(底部)
闲置(底部)
Witcher 3 (底部)
Witcher 3 (底部)
压力测试(底部
压力测试(底部

发言人

耳机接口几乎是最大音量的。
耳机接口几乎是最大音量的。
耳机接口在50% - 舒适的音量
耳机接口在50% - 舒适的音量

在我们最初的实践中,我们并没有注意到扬声器质量的大规模升级。 我们最初的亲身体验我们的印象在更广泛的测试后发生了一些变化。带有6个扬声器的新音响系统是目前你能在移动设备中得到的最好的系统,它可以很容易地取代廉价的外部扬声器。与已经非常好的MacBook Pro 13 M1相比,这些模块甚至更响亮、更有力,这也体现在改进的低音覆盖上。

你可以享受到非常丰富和强大的声音,只有一个真正的重低音扬声器才是额外的改进。MacBook支持3D音频。我们用一套AirPods Pro对它进行了测试,主观表现与一台iPhone 12 Pro.

3.5毫米耳机接口在50%的音量(舒适的听觉音量)以内提供了非常好的性能,但在更高的音量下开始失真。我们将在更大的MacBook Pro 16 M1 Pro的评论中包括详细的分析。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.235.42531.734.93125.834.94032.236.95027.535.96324.544.38023.154.710023.365.112521.966.316020.164.520021.566.825018.869.831517.671.940014.972.650013.770.96301473.680011.273.7100011.171.6125010.772.3160012.272.4200011.273.5250011.674.5315011.775.740001273500012.273.8630012.469.7800012.568.21000012.667.11250012.563.91600011.968.5SPL24.884.9N0.668.3median 12.5median 71.6Delta2.3333.63228.928.231.331.629.13034.634.526.734.224.338.926.447.423.648.224.250.523.656.121.655.719.760.91862.117.663.81764.417.56416.666.416.170.415.767.615.969.515.865.516.162.516.761.317.160.217.360.517.862.618.261.818.357.718.753.829.277.51.241.1median 17.6median 61.82.33.435.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro EntryApple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 19%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

耗电 - HDR会消耗电池

显示屏对功耗的影响很大。最低和最高亮度(SDR;500尼特)之间的差异略高于8W。我们确定的最大空闲值几乎为12W,但在全亮度的HDR视频播放过程中,我们可以测量到高达26W的峰值。这也解释了为什么Apple 限制标准内容的亮度。

负载下的功耗非常稳定(下图中的波动是由Unigine Valley中的场景变化引起的),但你也注意到,68W的最大功耗奇怪地非常接近67W电源适配器的极限。实际上,我们可以用MacBook Pro 16 M1 Max的140W PSU测出略高的消耗量(高达82W)。这意味着你不能在组合CPU/GPU的工作负载中使用最大的性能,即使使用入门级的 M1 Pro,尽管对性能的影响不大。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.9 / 11.6 / 11.9 Watt
Load midlight 49.5 / 68.5 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, , Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1, M1 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 14s i7
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.20
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5
R9 5900HX, Vega 8 R4000, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Asus ZenBook Duo 14 UX482EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix HFM512GD3JX013N, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00
Average Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
39%
-0%
-127%
4%
11%
0%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
2.9
1.67
42%
4.4
-52%
9.4
-224%
4.6
-59%
3.6
-24%
2.9
-0%
6.04 ?(2.22 - 28.6, n=88, last 2 years)
-108%
Idle Average *
11.6
6.7
42%
8.7
25%
15.8
-36%
7.7
34%
9.3
20%
11.6
-0%
10.7 ?(3 - 26.5, n=88, last 2 years)
8%
Idle Maximum *
11.9
7.4
38%
9.6
19%
24.1
-103%
10.3
13%
10
16%
11.9
-0%
13.8 ?(4.6 - 42, n=88, last 2 years)
-16%
Load Average *
49.5
28
43%
46
7%
76.8
-55%
54
-9%
40.6
18%
49.5
-0%
66 ?(24.8 - 150, n=88, last 2 years)
-33%
Witcher 3 ultra *
58.2
42.2
27%
154
-165%
54.4
7%
44.3
24%
Load Maximum *
68.5
47.5
31%
87.6
-28%
189.7
-177%
44.5
35%
62.4
9%
68.5
-0%
95.1 ?(28.8 - 235, n=88, last 2 years)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0510152025303540455055606570758055.155.155.55555.855.655.855.15656.356.155.456.456.156.556.456.556.259.258.956.356.256.857.256.256.957.157.557.156.556.956.457.857.856.656.857.457.257.957.257.357.358.35858.358.157.958.357.458.358.258.458.358.358.858.958.258.859.261.759.658.75959.258.858.758.959.259.15958.959.659.459.159.45958.859.458.858.558.458.958.658.959.358.859.158.758.658.358.858.158.758.658.858.95858.958.45858.658.95959.258.758.759.159.357.858.959.558.85958.858.958.959.458.858.859.358.459.259.658.858.858.558.75959.659.158.258.958.858.558.558.258.9595958.658.15958.758.758.558.658.658.958.558.958.958.758.958.559.158.15858.758.458.458.458.658.758.258.358.558.958.958.758.758.158.358.758.558.558.758.657.859.258.858.258.758.758.758.858.555.155.155.55555.855.655.855.15656.356.155.456.456.156.556.456.556.259.258.956.356.256.857.256.256.957.157.557.156.556.956.457.857.856.656.857.457.257.957.257.357.358.35858.358.157.958.357.458.358.258.458.358.358.858.958.258.859.261.759.658.75959.258.858.758.959.259.15958.959.659.459.159.45958.859.458.858.558.458.958.658.959.358.859.158.758.658.358.858.158.758.658.858.95858.958.45858.658.95959.258.758.759.159.357.858.959.558.85958.858.958.959.458.858.859.358.459.259.658.858.858.558.75959.659.158.258.958.858.558.558.258.9595958.658.15958.758.758.558.658.658.958.558.958.958.758.958.559.158.15858.758.458.458.458.658.758.258.358.558.958.958.758.758.158.358.758.558.558.758.657.859.258.858.258.758.758.758.858.573.373.273.272.973.373.773.669.670.674.274.67273.67474.174.675.659.877.572.372.973.473.573.272.972.672.873.369.472.573.673.473.673.573.87474.372.170.675.772.873.173.673.273.273.37458.876.375.87273.975.673.571.771.976.773.872.673.271.972.472.57473.953.175.978.472.77372.374.474.57473.672.773.273.673.45977.372.472.672.972.872.673.173.372.96976.773.173.472.973.474.674.773.974.273.769.78270.574.675.272.675.669.972.160.871.175.675.475.775.770.67171.472.666.575.17777.171.372.270.164.773.774.676.476.177.176.976.376.253.363.87173.174.373.873.272.372.973.172.872.972.763.17475.976.776.676.277.273.372.670.175.675.67675.675.576.271.971.766.26973.575.274.274.574.175.974.273.674.173.170.77676.47272.365.565.666.167.567.157.667.668.168.26868.168.568.468.167.567.868.368.368.568.268.168.464.868.268.468.367.468.568.368.368.268.366.967.56768.159.468.26867.166.267.366.666.667.167.464.166.567.767.56867.968.268.266.768.268.368.267.867.967.967.867.668.367.867.568.368.26768.368.4686868.16867.968.362.867.76867.266.867.967.668.268.167.96868.267.960.566.567.26766.365.965.666.666.366.668.468.468.459.768.468.468.468.468.467.767.668.367.868.167.860.964.866.668.266.867.968.168.268.253.161.264.464.867.265.265.365.16565.564.765.165.965.868.168.268.168.168.468.468.258.666.567.267.466.967.567.667.767.867.866.867.667.967.26867.467.667.667.967.666.758.667.567.968.36867.667.967.968.367.868.265.967.367.968.268.468.167.568.368.467.5Tooltip
; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø58.2 (55-61.7)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25; 140W PSU: Ø72.9 (53.1-82)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25; 67W PSU: Ø67.1 (53.1-68.5)

电池运行时间

配备69.6Wh电池的MBP 14
配备69.6Wh电池的MBP 14

69.9Wh电池的运行时间根据你的使用情况有很大的不同;我们在压力测试中得到了从一小时到15小时的视频播放(150尼特的SDR)的一切。我们的Wi-Fi测试(Safari,窗口化,150尼特)运行了13.5小时,但在500尼特的最大亮度下只有6.5小时。在全屏模式下,以最大亮度播放HDR视频,只能运行约4小时。

MacBook Pro 14支持快速充电(通过MagSafe和USB-C),但不支持使用默认的67W电源适配器。我们记录到,当设备闲置时,使用67W电源的充电时间为2.5小时。如果你在这段时间内使用MacBook,时间会更长。MacBook Pro 16的140W PSU(提供与可选的96W PSU相同的充电性能,电池容量是这里的限制因素)需要1:35小时才能充满电。30分钟后可达到50%;52分钟后可达到80%。

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Safari 15.1)
13h 36min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Safari 15.1)