Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ笔记本电脑回顾。明亮的显示屏和丰富的性能
虽然基于英特尔/英伟达的游戏笔记本多如牛毛，但配备AMD CPU和专用AMD GPU的机型却很少。华硕已经解决了这种不平衡，并在Zephyrus G14中组建了一个非常紧凑的AMD笔记本。
在我们审查了 GA402RK(Ryzen 9 6900HS& Radeon RX 6800S) 几个月前，我们对GA402RJ版本进行了测试。后者也是非常强大的，由于有了 Ryzen 7 6800HS和一个 Radeon RX 6700S伴随着16GB DDR5-4800内存（8GB焊接，8GB SO-DIMM）和1TB NVMe SSD（熟悉的M.2格式）。
一个哑光的高分辨率16:10显示屏，120赫兹，再次照顾到了图像的再现。盖子上的花式照明（动漫矩阵LED）也再次上阵。该软件包由Windows 11 Home作为操作系统来完成。成本：约2,499.99美元--对于所提供的GPU能力来说，这是一个相当高的价格。
与Zephyrus G14竞争的主要是 Razer Blade 14，即在变体中配备了 Ryzen 9 5900HX和一个 GeForce RTX 3070较早的G14代表配备了一个 RTX 3060和一个 RTX 3050 Ti也出现在以下对比表中。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.4 % | 10/2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S | 1.7 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 86.7 % | 03/2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK R9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800S | 1.7 kg | 19.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 82.7 % | 10/2021 | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
| 83.5 % | 02/2021 | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM R9 5900HS, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.5 % | 07/2021 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 |
由于该机箱与链接的GA402RK(除了颜色之外：月光灰 而不是月光白），本文将不对机箱、连接和输入设备进行解释。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
沟通
网络摄像头
显示
在显示功能方面，华硕几乎提供了全部的菜单。500尼特、QHD、3毫秒、120赫兹、100% DCI-P3、Dolby Vision HDR、自适应同步和Pantone认证。所有这些都确保Zephyrus在实践中提供出色的图像质量。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 1190:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.45 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.213
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ BOEhydis NE140QDM-NX1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK NE140QDM-NX1 (BOE0A1D), IPS-Level, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC TL140BDXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM LM140LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 TL140BDXP02-2, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -1% | -20% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 97.6 | 97.4 0% | 94.2 -3% | 68.1 -30% | 97.2 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 92.4 -8% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.6 | 85.5 0% | 84.5 -1% | 67.7 -21% | 85.4 0% |
| Response Times | -1% | -71% | -337% | -89% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.3 ? | 8.8 ? -6% | 20 ? -141% | 34.4 ? -314% | 16.4 ? -98% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 6 ? | 6 ? -0% | 6 ? -0% | 27.6 ? -360% | 10.8 ? -80% |
| PWM Frequency | 26191 ? | 27170 ? 4% | |||
| Screen | -12% | -64% | -48% | -0% | |
| Brightness middle | 500 | 480 -4% | 333 -33% | 329.4 -34% | 331.1 -34% |
| Brightness | 470 | 456 -3% | 317 -33% | 311 -34% | 318 -32% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 80 -6% | 89 5% | 90 6% | 91 7% |
| Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.48 -14% | 0.36 14% | 0.39 7% | 0.36 14% |
| Contrast | 1190 | 1000 -16% | 925 -22% | 845 -29% | 920 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.45 | 2.62 -7% | 5.58 -128% | 4.01 -64% | 2.25 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.34 | 6.71 -26% | 10.62 -99% | 8.21 -54% | 4.62 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 1.12 7% | 2.88 -140% | 3.89 -224% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 4.2 -35% | 7.5 -142% | 3.2 -3% | 1.7 45% |
| Gamma | 2.213 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.2 100% | 2.3 96% |
| CCT | 7251 90% | 7122 91% | 7220 90% | 7070 92% | 6751 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-7% | -45% /
-52% | -135% /
-83% | -30% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
与配备R9 6900HS和RX 6800S的型号一样，GA402RJ也在几乎所有可以想象的方面表现良好。平均亮度为470cd/m²，与100%的sRGB覆盖率和86%的AdobeRGB覆盖率一样是一流的。大多数买家也会对其响应时间（低于10毫秒）感到非常满意。由于黑值（0.42 vs 0.48 cd/m²）稍好，对比度甚至略好于其姐妹型号GA402RK（1,190:1 vs 1,000:1），尽管这可能是由于典型的系列变化，因为面板基本上是相同的。
在色彩准确性方面也没有什么可抱怨的。G14在其交付状态下已经提供了非常自然的色彩。此外，这台14英寸的笔记本不仅适用于专业的图像和视频编辑。由于高亮度，这款华硕笔记本电脑在封闭的房间外看起来也很不错。几乎没有任何其他游戏笔记本如此适合在户外使用。
唯一的缺点是：显示屏在35%的亮度以下会闪烁。另一方面，26KHz是如此之高，即使是敏感的人也不应该有任何问题。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26191 Hz | ≤ 35 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26191 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 35 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26191 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩
Zephyrus G14绝对属于高端类别。强大的CPU/GPU组合、现代的DDR5内存和快速的NVMe固态硬盘确保该笔记本电脑在未来几年内不会受到影响。
测试条件
自从我们评测GA402RK以来，强大的Armoury Crate（见截图）有了一些变化。为了保持测试条件的可比性，我们选择了尽可能相似的设置。虽然3D和游戏基准测试是在Turbo profile和GPU模式Ultimate下进行的，但其余测试是在Performance profile和GPU模式Standard下进行的。
我们不建议在实践中使用Turbo 配置文件，因为噪音发展很高（性能增益不成比例），但由于TGP在性能 模式下会有波动--GA402RK会发出问候--并且在一段时间后会下降，Turbo 模式是我们测量GPU的更好选择，因为它更可靠。
| Armoury Crate | CPU PL1 (HWINFO) | CPU PL2 (HWINFO) | GPU Power Draw @Witcher 3 | Noise @Witcher 3 | FPS @Witcher 3 |
| 安静 | 90W | 113 W | ~40 W | ~38 dB(A) | ~50 FPS |
| 性能 | 100 W | 125 W | ~65-75 W | ~43 dB(A) | ~80 FPS |
| Turbo | 125 W | 157 W | ~100 W | ~51 dB(A) | ~85 FPS |
处理器
在技术上，Ryzen 7 6800HS与Ryzen 9 6900HS几乎没有区别。这两款芯片都被指定为35瓦，有16MB L3缓存，8个核心，可以并行处理16个线程。只有更昂贵的兄弟姐妹的时钟高出100 MHz（基本）或200 MHz（提升）。6800HS不是3.3到4.9GHz，而是 "只 "管理3.2到4.7GHz，这也是很充裕的。
正如预期的那样，这对兄弟姐妹在CPU测试中非常接近，这就是为什么纯粹从处理器的角度来看，价格高出近400欧元的G14型号并不真正值得。如我们的表格所示，性能倾向于Ryzen 9 5900HS和5900HX的前辈芯片。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustainted Load
| CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM -2! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 -2! | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=224, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，评测样本轻松地在Razer Blade 14之前取得了第二名。PCMark 10的7345分仅比GA402RK少5%。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 7345 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=223, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=220, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
有趣的是，延迟有了明显的改善。我们测得的延迟不是4200微秒左右，而是略低于1100微秒，根据LatencyMon工具，这仍然不是一个理想值。Razer Blade 14在这里表现得非常积极（低于400微秒）。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
该存储设备没有留下任何批评的余地。安装的美光1TB驱动器（2450）是竞争对手中最强大的固态硬盘之一，无论是在读取和写入过程方面。此外，其性能--类似于CPU--在很长一段时间内保持相当稳定。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
该显卡对我们来说特别令人兴奋，因为到目前为止我们还没有Radeon RX 6700S的基准测试。与RX 6800S相比，这个便宜的家族分支不得不用1,792而不是2,048个着色器来做。所谓的游戏频率是1,890而不是1,975 MHz，有效内存速度是14而不是16 Gbps。对于2022年，8GB GDDR6 VRAM既不多也不特别少。
如果合成图形测试是什么，Radeon 6700HS的性能比6800S低了近20%，属于GeForce RTX 3060和RTX 3070之间的中间水平。
| 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK -1! | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC -1! | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 48289 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 75332 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26867 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 212851 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 59135 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21375 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8547 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
只要你把自己限制在全高清，不使用光线追踪，在游戏中的情况也是类似的。除了AMD芯片已知的这里和那里的一些离群值外，RX 6700S大多在RTX 3070和RTX 3060之间。一旦使用QHD或4K范围内的高分辨率，3D性能（这也是目前AMD的典型特征）比Nvdia下降更多，这导致性能值与RTX 3060相似。光线追踪的性能--正如预期的那样--相当一般。在这里，RX 6700S通常与RTX 3050 Ti相当，后者被安装在更便宜的笔记本电脑中。我们参考了我们的GPU页面和我们的 游戏列表进行详细比较。
在没有光线追踪的情况下，Zephyrus G14的速度足以在2560 x 1600的原始分辨率下以高到非常高的细节运行几乎所有的现代游戏，即使不总是在60 FPS以上。它只在要求非常高和/或适度优化的游戏中达到极限，如毁灭之光2和 Elex 2.
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK | |
| Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM | |
| Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC | |
为了检查图形性能是否保持稳定，我们用 的Witcher 3，它已经使用了相当长的一段时间了。与它更昂贵的兄弟姐妹一样，随着时间的推移，在性能 模式下帧率明显下降--这个问题在Turbo 模式下几乎没有发生过，这就是为什么它被用于前面提到的3D和游戏基准测试（尽管噪音发展陡峭）。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
| GTA V (2015) | 170.9 | 154.7 | 81.3 | ||
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 246 | 144 | 84.3 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 145.1 | 114.7 | 103 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 106.7 | 78.6 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65.4 | 51.7 | 45.2 | ||
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 110 | 103 | 97 | 79 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 227 | 182.7 | 157.3 | ||
| Hunt Showdown (2020) | 124.7 | 99.3 | 72 | ||
| Doom Eternal (2020) | 218 | 194.7 | 189.7 | 120.8 | |
| Gears Tactics (2020) | 189 | 123 | 88.1 | 56.7 | |
| Death Stranding (2020) | 139.8 | 129.8 | 128 | 85.4 | |
| Crysis Remastered (2020) | 171.2 | 55 | 46.6 | 28.4 | |
| Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 102 | 94.9 | 82.9 | 73.1 | |
| Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 92 | 84.3 | 51.2 | ||
| Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 286 | 245 | 224 | 146.7 | |
| Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 109 | 96 | 59 | 38 | |
| Dirt 5 (2020) | 116 | 98 | 80.3 | 67.7 | |
| Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 113 | 93 | 79 | 49 | |
| Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 98.5 | 94.7 | 83.5 | 48.9 | |
| Hitman 3 (2021) | 178 | 159 | 146 | 83.4 | |
| Outriders (2021) | 115.5 | 111.3 | 96.9 | 56.3 | |
| Resident Evil Village (2021) | 195.7 | 180.1 | 142.8 | 92.3 | |
| Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 98.4 | 95.3 | |||
| Days Gone (2021) | 117.4 | 106.5 | 77.2 | 50.6 | |
| Deathloop (2021) | 110.8 | 89 | 66.3 | 39.6 | |
| Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 133.3 | 120.8 | 78.2 | ||
| Far Cry 6 (2021) | 107 | 93 | 86 | 59 | |
| Back 4 Blood (2021) | 200 | 171.3 | 157.3 | 92.4 | |
| Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 112 | 111 | 104 | 68 | |
| Riders Republic (2021) | 100 | 91 | 88 | 59 | |
| Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 140 | 138 | 74 | 54 | |
| Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 155.9 | 134.2 | 119.8 | 104.5 | |
| Halo Infinite (2021) | 97.9 | 80.8 | 75.9 | 53.9 | |
| God of War (2022) | 79 | 69.4 | 50.5 | 38.9 | |
| Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 159 | 157 | 126 | 66 | |
| Dying Light 2 (2022) | 64.8 | 50.9 | 31.1 | ||
| GRID Legends (2022) | 194 | 147 | 114 | 88.1 | |
| Elden Ring (2022) | 59.9 | 59.9 | 59.9 | 56.6 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 99.1 | 74 | 59.7 | 31.2 | |
| Elex 2 (2022) | 70.7 | 64.8 | 59.2 | 38.3 | |
| Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 116.4 | 115.3 | 115.2 | 59.8 | |
| Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 133 | 82.4 | 62.4 | 39.1 | |
| Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 202 | 179.5 | 165.4 | 97.9 | |
| F1 22 (2022) | 211 | 161 | 37 | 21 | |
| The Quarry (2022) | 95.3 | 76.1 | 54.8 | 35.3 |
排放
噪声
当启用Perfomance 模式时，风扇会产生相当好的效果。43至45 dB(A)的3D水平是清晰可闻的，但比许多大型游戏笔记本还要安静。在空闲模式和简单的活动中，如办公、视频和网络，风扇通常完全不活动，所以你只听到非常微妙的线圈啸叫（不幸的是，在3D模式下经常出现更强烈的线圈啸叫）。如果你一般希望它尽可能安静，最好使用Armoury Crate的静音模式，这样可以使风扇更加安静，更加频繁，对许多游戏来说是足够的。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 26 / 29 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45 / 45 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 0% | -14% | -10% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 24 4% | 30.5 -22% | 24.8 1% | 25.1 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24 4% | 33.3 -33% | 25.4 -2% | 25.2 -1% |
| Idle Average * | 26 | 26 -0% | 33.3 -28% | 34.5 -33% | 25.2 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29 | 31 -7% | 33.3 -15% | 34.5 -19% | 25.2 13% |
| Load Average * | 45 | 45 -0% | 36.1 20% | 35.4 21% | 31 31% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 43 -0% | 52.7 -23% | 44 -2% | |
| Load Maximum * | 45 | 45 -0% | 48.6 -8% | 52.3 -16% | 51.7 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
对于游戏笔记本来说，机箱温度是典型的。虽然14英寸的笔记本在闲置模式下仍然感觉相当凉爽，但在3D模式下，顶部和底部都突破了50℃的大关，这可能会困扰一些用户。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.2 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 6% | -10% | 1% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 53 | 55 -4% | 53.6 -1% | 55.4 -5% | 45 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 55 -2% | 49.9 8% | 62.2 -15% | 44.4 18% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 34 | 30 12% | 44.8 -32% | 31 9% | 40.2 -18% |
| Idle Bottom * | 38 | 32 16% | 44.1 -16% | 32.4 15% | 39.2 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在组件方面，特别是CPU开始出汗。在使用Furmark和Prime95工具满负荷工作60分钟后，Ryzen 7 6800HS达到约90℃。Radeon RX 6700S的温度仍然低约10℃。
发言人
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
由于图形切换（MUX开关），Zephyrus G14在空闲时消耗的能量非常少（12至26瓦），尽管竞争对手允许更少的能量。在负载情况下，我们的评测设备发出的功率在88到194瓦之间，这是一个可以接受的结果。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 2.5 Watt |
| Idle | 12 / 18 / 26 Watt |
| Load |
88 / 194 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 14% | 22% | 33% | 10% | -16% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12 | 7 42% | 8.1 32% | 5.6 53% | 9.4 22% | 13.8 ? -15% |
| Idle Average * | 18 | 14 22% | 12.9 28% | 10.4 42% | 15.8 12% | 19.2 ? -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 26 | 22 15% | 16.1 38% | 18 31% | 24.1 7% | 27 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 88 | 98 -11% | 102.4 -16% | 68 23% | 76.8 13% | 111.3 ? -26% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 157.7 | 141 11% | 113 28% | 154 2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 194 | 188 3% | 135.8 30% | 158.2 18% | 189.7 2% | 251 ? -29% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
除了良好的显示效果和紧凑的外壳外，电池寿命也是这款14英寸手机的最大亮点之一。在实际的WLAN测试中，在亮度降低到150cd/m²的情况下，华硕的这款产品持续了大约10个小时，这就注定了Zephyrus G14是一款移动伴侣。
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RK Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HS, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QEC GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, 76 Wh | Asus Zephyrus G14 GA401QM GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HS, 76 Wh | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 RTX 3070 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, 62 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -7% | 10% | 16% | -28% | -40% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 612 | 572 -7% | 674 10% | 710 16% | 439 -28% | 368 ? -40% |
| Reader / Idle | 1085 | 1144 | 1262 | 828 | 544 ? | |
| Load | 53 | 161 | 81 | 79 | 84.2 ? | |
| H.264 | 616 | 399 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
GA402RJ版本配有 Ryzen 7 6800HS和 Radeon RX 6700S肯定会找到粉丝。
几乎没有任何其他游戏笔记本在如此小的空间内提供如此多的动力。即使是Razer Blade 14也很难跟上。华硕再次创造了一个非常强大的14英寸笔记本，除了原始性能外，整体上还表现得非常好。无论是显示屏、输入设备、声音还是电池运行时间。质量和结果都处于较高的水平。
事实上，它没有达到 "非常好 "的评级，主要是由于一些较小的细节，如不理想的端口布局（集中放置的电源端口），部分不太明显的键盘标签和适度的网络摄像头。
那些正在为各种应用寻找一个紧凑的电源，并具有顶级显示和高续航能力的人，绝对应该给Zephyrus G14一个机会。
价格和可用性
有兴趣的买家可以直接通过华硕的官方网站查询华硕ROG Zephyrus G14的供货情况。首先，选择你的位置并在搜索栏中输入ROG Zephyrus G14（通过放大镜符号）。
供应情况似乎很普遍。例如，我们在美国找到了这款笔记本电脑(2,499.99美元),墨西哥(MX$60,299.00),the UK(1,599.99英镑),法国(1,499.99欧元),罗马尼亚(7,549.00 Lei),南非(39,999兰特),阿拉伯联合酋长国,印度(₹1,46,990.00),新加坡(3,298.00新元)和澳大利亚(AU$2,999.00)。
这份清单并不详尽。价格截止到2022年10月7日，可能会有变化。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
-
10/02/2022 v7
Florian Glaser
Pricecompare
