Notebookcheck Logo

Medion Erazer Major X10笔记本电脑评测。英特尔A730M的首次亮相

在与Nvidia和AMD的对抗中挣扎。 Medion Major X10是一款非常令人兴奋的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑。它是我们审查的第一款采用英特尔A730M显卡的笔记本。在这次审查中,我们将看到它与其他笔记本电脑在性能方面的比较。
Alder Lake Arc Gaming Intel Laptop / Notebook

Erazer Major X10的价格约为1,700欧元(1,728美元),可在Medion的在线商店购买。.对于这个价格,你得到的不仅仅是32GB的双通道内存(2 x 16GB DDR5-4800),还有1TB的NVMe存储。这款笔记本电脑采用酷睿i7-12700H,这是一款在游戏笔记本电脑中非常受欢迎的14核处理器。正如一开始提到的,苛刻的图形处理是由英特尔的Arc A730M处理的--一个中档的GPU,主要是为了与 GeForce RTX 3060Radeon RX 6600M.这款笔记本电脑还配备了哑光165Hz显示屏,长宽比为16:10,分辨率为2,560 x 1,600。Windows 11家庭版使整个软件包更加完善。

Medion Erazer Major X10 (Erazer Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc A730M - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2050 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 30.0.101.1736, Switchable Graphics
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB of SODIMM DDR5-4800, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AUO B160QAN03.H, IPS, QHD+, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 Combined (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 359 x 265
Battery
80 Wh, 5195 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 300 W power supply, Medion Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.51 kg, Power Supply: 880 g
Price
1700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Major X10正在与其他中端游戏笔记本电脑竞争,如华硕TUF F17 FX707Z-HX011W,Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R(两者都有RTX 3060;一个有较高的TGP,另一个有平均的TGP)和HP Omen 16-c0077ng(RX 6600M)。据称较慢的 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7620配有GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus 7620也同样被列入对比表。我们将在后面的评论中解释原因。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
09/2022
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M
2.5 kg31 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.1 %
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.9 %
08/2022
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg28.6 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
08/2022
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18.99 mm16.00"3072x1920
86 %
04/2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440

底盘

从外观上看,Major X10让我们想起了联想的Legion 系列。Medion公司选择使用哑光的黑色底盘和铝制的盖子。在我们看来,机箱感觉很结实,尽管当你用力时,底座部分肯定会在某些地方弯曲,而且盖子可以更结实一些(就像大多数笔记本电脑的情况一样)。显示器可以打开到180°,这对笔记本电脑来说是相当不寻常的。铰链的工作没有任何问题。例如,该设备可以用一只手轻松打开。Medion公司为这台笔记本电脑配备了许多照明元素,使其对游戏玩家具有吸引力。除了键盘之外,盖子上的标志和两侧后部的十字线在视觉上也很突出。键盘上方的通风口采用了十字线设计,以补充整体的美感。

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

Major X10有一个非常好的配合和完成。在我们的评测单元上,所有的表面都整齐地连接在一起。在2.5公斤(5.5磅),这个16英寸的设备对于游戏笔记本电脑来说既不轻也不特别重。作为比较,稍大的华硕TUF F17和宏碁Nitro 5 AN517分别重2.5公斤(5.5磅)和3.1公斤(6.8磅),而16英寸的竞争对手Omen 16和Inspiron 16 Plus则稍轻一些,分别为2.3公斤(5.1磅)和2.1公斤(4.6磅)。根据制造商的说法,Major X10的厚度为2.7厘米(1.06英寸),不含脚垫,3.1厘米(1.22英寸)。

尺寸比较

400.5 mm 294 mm 28.6 mm 3.1 kg394 mm 264 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg370 mm 245 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 265 mm 31 mm 2.5 kg356.78 mm 251.9 mm 18.99 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

特点

接口

如果你不介意没有Thunderbolt端口和读卡器,你会对笔记本的端口选择感到满意。有三个USB A型接口和两个C型接口(与DisplayPort兼容),除了一个以外,都支持3.2 Gen 2标准。这款笔记本电脑还配备了一个组合音频插孔(耳机和麦克风),一个RJ45以太网端口和一个HDMI 2.0输出。由于最重要的端口位于笔记本电脑的背面,你不必担心在使用外部鼠标进行游戏时,你的行动会受到很大限制。

在左边。USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
在左边。USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
在后面。RJ45以太网,1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,HDMI 2.0,电源端口
在后面。RJ45以太网,1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,HDMI 2.0,电源端口
在右边:2个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括DisplayPort),USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
在右边:2个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括DisplayPort),USB-A 3.2 Gen 2

连接性

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,没有任何惊喜(笔记本电脑距离我们的参考路由器华硕AXE11000 1米)。该设备内部的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201模块提供了高传输速度,符合预期。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1734 (1678min - 1748max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=72)
1440 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1481 (1366min - 1520max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (438 - 1715, n=67)
1300 MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s -14%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1678-1748)
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (1366-1520)

网络摄像头

Medion可以做一个更好的网络摄像头。尽管网络摄像头比许多竞争对手略微清晰和快速,但它在色彩准确性方面有所欠缺,这与许多笔记本电脑上的内置网络摄像头很相似。

ColorChecker
16 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Major X10: 15.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.25 ∆E

辅料

我们的评测装置只配备了一个300瓦的电源,尺寸约为20 x 9 x 2厘米(7.9 x 3.5 x 0.8英寸)。

维护

该设备的内部可以以与大多数游戏笔记本电脑相同的方式进行维护。从底部卸下11颗十字螺丝后,你可以将底盖从笔记本上抬起来。因为有夹子将盖子固定住,所以你需要用一个平坦的工具施加很大的力量来做。在机箱内部,你会发现两个SODIMM插槽,两个M.2插槽(都位于盖子下面),无线模块和电池。冷却系统由两个风扇组成,共用几根热管。

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

担保

Erazer Major X10有24个月的保修期。

输入设备

键盘

这款16英寸的笔记本电脑采用了一个带有完整数字键盘的小圆盘,其按键比其他地方略窄。与许多其他制造商不同,Medion决定使用大小合适的方向键,而不是那些小的方向键--一些游戏玩家会对此感到高兴。我们也喜欢这款键盘的布局,它主要坚持了标准的QWERTZ设计。亮点之一是具有可调亮度水平的四区RGB照明。有几种模式可供选择,让你定制照明。对于游戏笔记本来说,键盘的打字感觉很好,也就是说,它给你足够的反馈。

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

触摸板

对触摸板也没有什么可抱怨的。尺寸约为12 x 6.5厘米(4.7 x 2.6英寸),由于其相当光滑的表面,它可以让手指毫不费力地滑过,也没有表现出任何问题(例如,在精确度和手势方面)。只有底部的点击区域对我们来说有点太脆弱了,尽管足够结实。

显示

一流的显示屏是该设备的一个突出特点。现在,16:10面板在游戏笔记本中也越来越受欢迎。而Medion也在顺应这一趋势。

429
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B160QAN03.H tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 489 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.205
Medion Erazer Major X10
AUO B160QAN03.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Display
-42%
-15%
1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
70.4
40.2
-43%
58.9
-16%
70.8
1%
68.8
-2%
sRGB Coverage
98
59.7
-39%
86.4
-12%
99.5
2%
96.9
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.5
41.5
-43%
60.5
-17%
73.2
1%
71.1
-2%
Response Times
-273%
16%
-256%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.9 ?(6.5, 7.4)
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
-182%
6 ?(3, 3)
57%
38 ?(21.2, 16.8)
-173%
13 ?(6, 7)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
-363%
8 ?(4, 4)
-25%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-338%
10 ?(5, 5)
-56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-66%
-36%
9%
-30%
Brightness middle
489
287
-41%
286
-42%
288.9
-41%
297
-39%
Brightness
436
268
-39%
278
-36%
276
-37%
283
-35%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
89
9%
92
12%
91
11%
Black Level *
0.4
0.17
57%
0.32
20%
0.26
35%
0.22
45%
Contrast
1223
1688
38%
894
-27%
1111
-9%
1350
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.08
5.1
-145%
3.05
-47%
1.88
10%
3.25
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.27
8.72
-104%
5.83
-37%
4.37
-2%
6.33
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.27
5.1
-302%
3.13
-146%
0.42
67%
1.11
13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
4.24
-63%
3.17
-22%
1.4
46%
6.97
-168%
Gamma
2.205 100%
2.44 90%
2.29 96%
2.3 96%
2.3 96%
CCT
6797 96%
6008 108%
6916 94%
6634 98%
6050 107%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-127% / -90%
-12% / -24%
-82% / -30%
-19% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

友达制造的165Hz显示屏(型号B160QAN03.H)几乎在所有方面都很出色。首先,在峰值亮度方面,它超过了竞争对手。该面板的平均峰值亮度为436cd/m²,从而使Major X10相当适合在户外使用。作为比较,竞争对手甚至不能达到300cd/m²。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(已校准)。
CalMAN:灰度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

第二,1,233:1的对比度对于IPS面板来说是非常好的。然而,这只足以使该笔记本电脑在我们的比较组中处于中间位置。也就是说,正如我们使用CalMan进行的测量所显示的那样(见截图),该显示器开箱后就已经有了相当的色彩准确性。它的色彩覆盖率应该能够满足大多数消费者--98%的sRGB覆盖率对于一台游戏笔记本来说是绰绰有余的。而且屏幕能够覆盖73%的AdobeRGB和70%的P3色彩空间。

Medion Erazer Major X10与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs P3
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs P3

视角是典型的IPS面板。我们的测量设备报告的响应时间为6毫秒(黑到白)和14毫秒(灰到灰),相对于我们比较中的其他笔记本电脑,这同样不坏。然而,有点遗憾的是,在边缘有一些明显的IPS光晕。我们的评测单元的亮度分布仅为82%。

屏幕上的光
屏幕上的光
子像素阵列
子像素阵列
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.5 ms rise
↘ 7.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

业绩

虽然拥有32GB的内存和12GB的VRAM叫作高端,但由于Major X10的图形性能不甚理想,我们只能将其归类为中端机器(后面有更深入的分析)。以1,700欧元(1,728美元)的价格,整体包装不能真正被认为是一个伟大的交易。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

你可以在预装的控制中心软件中选择三个配置文件。除非另有说明,测量是在Major X10的游戏模式下进行的,这应该与其他笔记本电脑的性能模式相似。你可以在下表中找到各种配置文件的PL1和PL2设置。

控制中心
控制中心
控制中心

处理器

这台Medion笔记本电脑中的酷睿i7-12700H是英特尔Alder Lake系列中的最新一代10纳米处理器。这个高端选项提供6个性能和8个效率核心,并能使用超线程处理多达20个线程的并行运算。在我们一系列的CPU测试中,Major X10即使没有激活Turbo模式也表现良好。在Cinebench R15循环测试中,其性能稳定在一个相当稳定的水平,略高于12700H的竞争对手所能达到的水平。甚至 Ryzen 7 5800H在惠普Omen 16中也不能与这个性能水平相提并论。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2237 (2206.41-2384.22)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2176 (2139.15-2407.46)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1998 (1901.59-2430.28)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
84 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
74.5 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
73.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
72.2 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
70.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.4 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
55.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19581 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
14899 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
14704 (12621.1min - 14704.4max) Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
13774 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points -18%
Single Core
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
1822 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
1816 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1816 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1766 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points -22%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +34%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
6030 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5648 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
5545 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points -15%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
698 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points -21%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
2430 (1901.59min - 2430.28max) Points +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
2412 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
2384 (2206.41min - 2384.22max) Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points -15%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
254 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points -13%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
235 Seconds * -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
227 Seconds * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
217 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.9 Seconds * +8%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77274 MIPS +23%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
62953 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
59929 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
54224 MIPS -14%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6133 MIPS +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
5907 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
5756 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5570 MIPS -6%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13627 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
13515 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
12157 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
11887 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points -40%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1811 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1733 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
1691 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points -25%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +30%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.3 fps -1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
9.06 fps -45%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * -95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * -82%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
50.7 s * -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
47.4 s *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.1 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.473 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.4687 sec * -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4679 sec * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * -2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4533 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15298
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
17026 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
130.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
131.96 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2384 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
200 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
263 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.6 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
83.1 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
69.8 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
61.9 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
54.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)
18634 KRay/s +144%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s +91%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12734 KRay/s +67%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s +42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7897 KRay/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
7632 KRay/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)
93571 Points +154%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points +149%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63563 Points +72%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36924 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
36879 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)
4332 MB/s +64%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2892 MB/s +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2696 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
2645 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)
109573 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98875 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
98756 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92646 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)
12203 Points +30%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
9397 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9061 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8567 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points +136%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)
47882 Points +124%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31113 Points +45%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points +30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21882 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
21413 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)
107712 MB/s +91%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s +51%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65597 MB/s +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56534 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
56481 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)
1213 MB/s +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
969 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
945 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
919 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)
10089 KRay/s +125%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s +71%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6747 KRay/s +50%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s +33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4681 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
4491 KRay/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
38760 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)
36818 MPixel/s -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35147 MPixel/s -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s -15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s -49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19573 MPixel/s -50%

系统性能

在系统性能方面,这台16英寸笔记本电脑在我们的比较中获得了第三名,在PCMark中获得了6830分的优异成绩。根据我们的主观印象,操作系统的反应速度和流畅性。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
6846 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (6830 - 6845, n=2)
6838 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6830 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6651 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
11116 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (10529 - 11116, n=2)
10823 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
10172 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9784 Points -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points +27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9119 Points +26%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9098 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
7260 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (7070 - 7260, n=2)
7165 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (10714 - 11691, n=2)
11203 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
10714 Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9409 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8950 Points -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1881 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1810 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1740 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1795 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1766 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1651 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1952 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1916 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1886 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1923 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1724 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1523 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points
PCMark 10 Score
6830 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
61237 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)
59453 MB/s -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54375 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41426 MB/s -32%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
65324 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)
63375 MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62046 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -12%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43175 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)
61670 MB/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
59407 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57432 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49644 MB/s -16%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)
87.3 ns *
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

正如笔记本电脑经常出现的情况一样,Major X10在延迟方面有一些问题。根据LatencyMon,该笔记本电脑只适合在有限的范围内进行实时音频和视频处理。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * -36%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * -23%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1710.5 μs *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1038 μs * +39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
989.5 μs * +42%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Major X10内置的NVMe固态硬盘具有高于平均水平的速度,会让竞争对手感到紧张。它具有出色的连续读取和写入速度,分别超过5,000 MB/s和4,000 MB/s(使用AS SSD Benchmark获得)。还有第二个PCIe M.2插槽,如果将来需要,你可以方便地扩展存储。

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7091 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4708 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1043 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 763.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3442 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3125 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 83.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 319.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
91 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.8 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.2 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
56.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
49.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
36.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4572 (1938.92min - 4572max) MB/s +28%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3582 (3181.8min - 3581.9max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s -1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2746 (2728.19min - 2745.84max) MB/s -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2355 (2335.33min - 2354.8max) MB/s -34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s -50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s -50%
seq write
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4434 (4418.88min - 4433.95max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)
3829 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3714 (3600.39min - 3714.27max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2786 (2776.21min - 2785.86max) MB/s -25%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s -29%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2020 (1893.72min - 2020.34max) MB/s -46%
seq q8 t1 read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6976 (5599.73min - 6976.39max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6792 (6372.24min - 6792.05max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)
6390 MB/s -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s -50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s -50%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3503 (3178.09min - 3503.42max) MB/s -50%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2569 (2176.89min - 2569.43max) MB/s -63%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5091 (5070.42min - 5091.14max) MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
5011 (4994.03min - 5010.93max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)
4818 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3016 (2902.04min - 3015.7max) MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s -40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2752 (2520.98min - 2752.46max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
90.4 (89.34min - 90.39max) MB/s +7%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
84.3 (83.89min - 84.32max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s -19%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
62.7 (61.51min - 62.72max) MB/s -26%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
48.8 (47.91min - 48.76max) MB/s -42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s -61%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s -61%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
295 (292.45min - 295.27max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
236 (235.61min - 236.11max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s -27%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
162.6 (156.2min - 162.6max) MB/s -45%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
144 (143.57min - 144.35max) MB/s -51%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3551 (3538.39min - 3550.66max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2780 (2665.55min - 2779.85max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)
2590 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s -38%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1798 (1787.41min - 1797.64max) MB/s -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
652 (637.52min - 651.63max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3398 (3342.89min - 3398.03max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2249 (2140.07min - 2249.23max) MB/s -34%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s -37%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2142 (2133.48min - 2142.48max) MB/s -37%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
408 (386.27min - 408.12max) MB/s -88%
AS SSD
Score Total
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
8906 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6843 Points -23%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5866 Points -34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5514 Points -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4577 Points -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2529 Points -72%
Score Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3464 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2508 Points -28%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2363 Points -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2182 Points -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2121 Points -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1190 Points -66%
Score Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3707 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3120 Points -16%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2325 Points -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2324 Points -37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1450 Points -61%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
762 Points -79%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5367 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
5200.42 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4963 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3148 MB/s -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2693.29 MB/s -48%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2656 MB/s -49%
Seq Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
4309.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)
3673 MB/s -15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2565 MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2535 MB/s -41%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1904 MB/s -56%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1683.46 MB/s -61%
4K Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
97.3 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)
66.9 MB/s -31%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
65.01 MB/s -33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.97 MB/s -45%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
52.1 MB/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
28.83 MB/s -70%
4K Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
294.39 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)
211 MB/s -28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
203.81 MB/s -31%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
197.81 MB/s -33%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
136.8 MB/s -54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
59 MB/s -80%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2846.23 MB/s
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1996 MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)
1939 MB/s -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1827 MB/s -36%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1591.21 MB/s -44%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
855.48 MB/s -70%
4K-64 Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2981.55 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)
2544 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2011 MB/s -33%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1931 MB/s -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1055.78 MB/s -65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
395.8 MB/s -87%
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.086 ms *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.078 ms * +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.075 ms * +13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.066 ms * +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.057 ms * +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)
0.05343 ms * +38%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.06 ms * -362%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.059 ms * -354%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)
0.04639 ms * -257%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.027 ms * -108%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.021 ms * -62%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.013 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10: Ø6972 (5977.93-7028.19)

图形卡

我们已经来到了Major X10最有趣的部分:它的显卡。这是英特尔Arc A730M(24个Xe核心和24个光线追踪单元)首次出现在我们的测试平台上。当涉及到合成图形基准时,英特尔GPU是一个出色的表现者。在3DMark测试中,它明显超过了GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,与GeForce RTX 3060和Radeon RX 6600M处于同一水平。启用Turbo模式后,Medion笔记本电脑能够从GPU中获得多出近20%的性能,并在我们的比较中加速超过其他设备。更多基准测试结果可以在 我们关于Arc A730M的页面.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
78.3 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1!
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
76.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
76 pt
Average Intel Arc A730M
 
69.1 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
68.4 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
66.5 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
45.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40487 Points +51%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
31859 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
31466 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30335 Points +13%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (24928 - 31551, n=4)
28692 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
28009 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
26822 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
18679 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +46%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
24460 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
23109 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
22409 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21574 Points +7%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (19850 - 22620, n=4)
21265 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
20179 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13760 Points -32%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12066 Points +39%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
10352 Points +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9000 Points +4%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (7212 - 10352, n=4)
8798 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
8677 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8342 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
8207 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5352 Points -38%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +68%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
5678 Points +24%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4789 Points +4%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (3758 - 5678, n=3)
4675 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
4588 Points
3DMark 06 Standard Score
46579 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
63844 points
3DMark 11 Performance
24223 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
119799 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44757 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18543 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9041 points
Help

游戏性能

相比之下,GPU在游戏基准测试中的情况非常复杂。即使A730M有时能够挑战RTX 3060和RX 6600M,但它经常只是徘徊在GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的性能水平,这通常出现在更便宜的游戏笔记本电脑中。在最坏的情况下,A730M甚至比RTX 3050 Ti还慢。考虑到GPU的价格和规格(12GB对4GB的VRAM),这是相当令人失望的。英特尔真的应该继续改善驱动支持。与我们在iGPU中看到的情况类似,一些游戏运行时出现了视觉伪影或其他杂项问题。我们还不得不处理偶尔的崩溃问题。也就是说,图形切换似乎工作良好。我们测试中使用的所有游戏都是直接分配给dGPU的。从根本上说,Arc A730M或多或少是为全高清显示器设计的。在1,920 x 1,080的分辨率下,几乎所有游戏在细节设置为高或非常高的情况下都能顺利运行。同时,更高的分辨率(如原生的2,560 x 1,600)使英特尔GPU达到极限。关于更多的GPU比较,你可以查看我们的游戏列表.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)
220 fps +93%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
159 fps +39%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
154 (18.3min, 38.2P0.1, 89.8P1) fps +35%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H
135 fps +18%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H
114 (101min) fps
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
108.4 (94min) fps -5%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +137%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
86.1 fps +74%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H
84 fps +70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
83 (16.2min, 27.8P0.1, 56.4P1) fps +68%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
57 (53min) fps +15%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H
49.4 (40min) fps

我们运行 在笔记本电脑上运行了Witcher 3在笔记本电脑上运行了一个小时,以检查3D性能在较长时间内的保持情况。结果是:没有出现性能下降或任何类似问题。

Witcher 3 FPS graph

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 i7-12700H, A730M: Ø48.4 (46-52)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø77.6 (73-84)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU: Ø78.8 (76-82)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø50.5 (48-54)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M: Ø79.4 (76-86)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 165.9 100.3 42.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 212 114 49.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 109.3 94.2 90.4 80.4
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 71 49.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 57.3 47.1 38.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 92 83 78
Strange Brigade (2018) 178.2 148.8 124.1
Hunt Showdown (2020) 88.2 72.3 50.1
Doom Eternal (2020) 112.4 104.2 101.7 70.9
Gears Tactics (2020) 147 99.2 79.7 52
Death Stranding (2020) 89.8 82.9 81.9 60
Crysis Remastered (2020) 125.4 60.7 50.1 34.8
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 72.7 54.8 42.5 34.7
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) 55.4 52.7 36.9
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) 167.1 149.4 140.6 97.4
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 85 75 48 35
Dirt 5 (2020) 80.6 64.5 54 44.2
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) 64 54 48 37
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 51.3 47.3 46.1 39.4
Hitman 3 (2021) 123 109 102 65
Outriders (2021) 90 76.1 69 43.9
Resident Evil Village (2021) 119.9 107.8 93.3 61.1
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) 88.5 81.9
Days Gone (2021) 80.2 76 58.2 42
Deathloop (2021) 76.2 65.5 54.6 37
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) 116.7 98.6 67.5
Far Cry 6 (2021) 87 75 65 47
Back 4 Blood (2021) 132.9 115.4 105.9 68.3
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 81 76 73 52
Riders Republic (2021) 60 51 47 34
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) 86 80 50 41
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 136.6 110.8 107.2 80.5
Halo Infinite (2021) 67.2 59.8 56.2 42.3
God of War (2022) 53.1 44.9 36.9 30.7
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 103 99 83 55
Dying Light 2 (2022) 60.9 51.2 35.6
GRID Legends (2022) 109 91 71 56.9
Elden Ring (2022) 59.9 59.7 56.9 46.2
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 71 57.5 57.4 30.9
Elex 2 (2022) 49.7 48.8 43.3 36.5
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 85.4 83.6 83.3 52.3
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 86.6 64.6 52 35.5
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 135.8 121.5 111.9 71.4
F1 22 (2022) 124 104 35 23.4
The Quarry (2022) 58.9 47.5 38.1 24.8

排放

噪声排放

当Major X10在游戏模式下运行时,可以明显听到声音。负载下的噪音水平可以达到49至51 dB(A),许多用户可能会认为这很烦人。也就是说,其他游戏笔记本也可以和Major X10一样响,甚至比它更响。我们肯定会建议使用耳机。在空闲状态下,你可以预期该设备会产生30至31 dB(A)的噪音,这相当明显,但不是特别安静。16英寸笔记本很少完全安静,因为风扇通常在运行。

Noise Level

Idle
25 / 30 / 31 dB(A)
Load
49 / 51 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.338.14236.340.22539.335.836.536.2353147.444.447.547.147.74029.931.431.229.933.85028.340.440.338.831.86333.826.230.228.636.68024.822.123.618.729.110023.719.520.91924.212525.617.718.118.827.916024.922.423.121.727.120028.923.22420.227.925028.823.724.120.730.331528.82222.719.330.44003220.820.5143450032.822.521.61835.16303522.921.616.337.180036.420.719.913.938.310003820.218.71339.5125040.32119.211.742.3160038.519.71810.741.2200037.217.816.410.439.7250035.91916.310.938.4315037171511.439.1400037.516.415.111.439.4500038.616.715.412.740.6630033.415.414.913.236.1800030.313.914.11233.3100002513.113.311.428.81250022.712.91311.124.71600019.812.212.510.419.7SPL48.831.13025.551N6.41.51.30.77.5median 32.8median 19.5median 18.1median 13median 35.1Delta633.13.15.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseMedion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
Noise
11%
-3%
4%
-6%
off / environment *
25
24
4%
25.5
-2%
23.3
7%
25
-0%
Idle Minimum *
25
24
4%
25.5
-2%
25.7
-3%
25
-0%
Idle Average *
30
24
20%
25.5
15%
26.1
13%
31.2
-4%
Idle Maximum *
31
24
23%
27
13%
30.6
1%
33.8
-9%
Load Average *
49
42.6
13%
52.6
-7%
46.2
6%
55.4
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
46.84
6%
49.2
2%
Load Maximum *
51
46.84
8%
68.2
-34%
49.4
3%
56
-10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

底盘温度给我们留下了复杂的感觉。一方面,机箱在闲置时比其竞争对手更热,顶部温度高达45°C(113°F),底部温度为48°C(118°F)。另一方面,当设备满负荷运行时,它不会变得太热。尽管如此,在游戏过程中,你可能仍然不应该把设备放在你的膝盖上。

Max. Load
 44 °C45 °C43 °C 
 41 °C41 °C39 °C 
 35 °C33 °C34 °C 
Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 39.4 °C
46 °C48 °C46 °C
40 °C47 °C39 °C
32 °C30 °C33 °C
Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 40.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
Heat
6%
1%
12%
15%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
52
-16%
48.3
-7%
46
-2%
40.6
10%
Maximum Bottom *
48
47
2%
52
-8%
45.8
5%
36
25%
Idle Upper Side *
38
31
18%
34.5
9%
29.2
23%
31.3
18%
Idle Bottom *
39
31
21%
35.8
8%
31
21%
36
8%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

与Witcher 3 ,Arc A730M完成了一小时的压力测试(运行FurMark和Prime95),平均温度约为65℃(149℉)。同时,酷睿i7-12700H轻而易举地通过了测试,运行温度略高于70°C(158°F),这对CPU来说也是绝对安全的。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.342.12536.239.13147.147.94029.931.55038.8286328.629.88018.723.51001927.212518.839.516021.747.520020.252.225020.759.531519.363.24001466.7500187063016.374.580013.972.510001373125011.773.3160010.770.1200010.469.8250010.970.6315011.467.8400011.461.5500012.759.2630013.264.380001266.71000011.462.21250011.159.61600010.448.7SPL25.581.6N0.752.2median 13median 64.3Delta3.18.130.331.130.33537.93539.837.139.836.131.736.134.632.934.631.129.531.130.920.730.932.523.332.540.11940.145.418.645.447.721.647.750.418.550.456.213.756.257.11357.164.111.464.170.611.170.673.410.673.474.28.374.271.38.571.364.38.864.362.89.562.858.510.158.562.410.762.465.51165.566.111.166.156.811.956.858.51258.551.211.751.247.611.447.64510.84579.523.479.542.60.542.6median 58.5median 11.4median 58.58.12.48.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseMedion Erazer Major X10Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Medion Erazer Major X10 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

发言人

Major X10的音质在游戏笔记本中属于平均水平。正如通常的情况一样,扬声器主要缺乏低音。因此,如果你想真正享受笔记本上的音乐和视频,你应该尽可能地拿一副耳机。

电源管理

消耗功率

很难理解为什么Medion将一个笨重的300瓦的电源与笔记本放在一起。在我们的压力测试中,Major X10使用的功率不超过220瓦,这表明一个更紧凑的230瓦的充电器会更合理。在负载情况下,该设备消耗122至220瓦的电力,这与配备RTX 3060的笔记本电脑相似。然而,其24至36瓦的高空闲功耗使其在对比组中稳居榜首。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 24 / 26 / 36 Watt
Load midlight 122 / 220 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
33%
23%
43%
13%
18%
Idle Minimum *
24
6.6
72%
9.7
60%
6.8
72%
12
50%
Idle Average *
26
8.3
68%
14.6
44%
9.6
63%
12.8
51%
Idle Maximum *
36
11.8
67%
16.7
54%
17
53%
18.5
49%
Load Average *
122
119
2%
166
-36%
117.5
4%
190
-56%
Witcher 3 ultra *
155.6
169
-9%
113.1
27%
194
-25%
Load Maximum *
220
222
-1%
235
-7%
137.4
38%
200
9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø155.6 (150.9-202)
Medion Erazer Major X10; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø143.9 (125.8-197.9)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø100 (96.6-118.3)
Medion Erazer Major X10; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.6 (120.3-131.2)
Medion Erazer Major X10; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø131.6 (129.2-152.8)
Medion Erazer Major X10; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø145.7 (141.1-159.1)

电池寿命

尽管Major X10的电池容量不错(80Wh),但它并不完全具备强大的耐力,在这方面经常落后于竞争对手。然而,当我们用它在中等屏幕亮度下通过Wi-Fi浏览互联网时,它的续航能力相当可观,达到6.5小时。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 13min
WiFi Websurfing
6h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
0h 47min
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M, 80 Wh
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90.61 Wh
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M, 70 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
112%
58%
72%
-9%
27%
Reader / Idle
493
701
42%
1114
126%
WiFi v1.3
400
519
30%
387
-3%
575
44%
363
-9%
Load
47
138
194%
111
136%
69
47%
H.264
462
317
419
Witcher 3 ultra
83

Pros

+ 伟大的16:10显示屏(亮度、色彩再现、分辨率...)。
+ 很好地利用了Core i7-12700H的功率
+ 两个M.2驱动器的空间
+ 32GB的DDR5内存
+ 非常快的固态硬盘

Cons

- Arc A730M的游戏性能波动很大
- 没有Thunderbolt,没有读卡器
- 闲置时的高耗电量
- 笨重的电源
- 负载下声音大

判决书

Erazer Major X10:评测单位由德国Medion公司慷慨提供。
Erazer Major X10:评测单位由德国Medion公司慷慨提供。

对于它所提供的游戏性能来说太昂贵了:这就是Medion Erazer Major X10可以被概括的方式。

虽然英特尔Arc A730M 在合成基准中表现相对较好,并在与GeForce RTX 3060Radeon RX 6600M 的竞争中表现出色,但其各种弱点和性能异常在实际游戏中变得明显,其性能水平与GeForce RTX 3050 Ti 相当甚至更差。因此,就性价比而言,很难推荐Arc A730M,特别是考虑到其电源效率仍有待提高。

否则,Major X10在大多数情况下是相当令人印象深刻的。特别是16英寸的屏幕,由于其16:10的长宽比、高分辨率(2,560 x 1,600)、高峰值亮度和出色的色彩再现,为购买该笔记本电脑提供了一个令人信服的理由。

总的来说,我们只向铁杆英特尔粉丝或那些对显示器极为挑剔的人推荐Major X10。所有其他需要或想要注意预算的游戏玩家可能应该看看带有RTX 3060或具有类似性能的GPU的笔记本电脑。Medion目前提供了一些具有这种规格的设备(更不用说它们通常更便宜)。

价格和可用性

Erazer Major X10配备酷睿i7-12700H、Arc A730M、32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘存储,价格约为1700欧元(1728美元),可从Medion的德国在线商店购买。.在本评论发表时,这款笔记本电脑还没有在其他地区上市。

Medion Erazer Major X10 - 09/12/2022 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
77 / 98 → 79%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
81%
Connectivity
60 / 80 → 75%
Weight
60 / 10-66 → 89%
Battery
72 / 95 → 76%
Display
92%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 87%
Noise
74 / 90 → 82%
Audio
75%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Average
76%
85%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Medion Erazer Major X10笔记本电脑评测。英特尔A730M的首次亮相
Florian Glaser, 2022-09-15 (Update: 2022-09-15)