Notebookcheck Logo

Medion Erazer Major X10笔记本电脑评测。英特尔A730M的首次亮相

在与Nvidia和AMD的对抗中挣扎。 Medion Major X10是一款非常令人兴奋的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑。它是我们审查的第一款采用英特尔A730M显卡的笔记本。在这次审查中,我们将看到它与其他笔记本电脑在性能方面的比较。
Alder Lake Arc Gaming Intel Laptop / Notebook

Erazer Major X10的价格约为1,700欧元(1,728美元),可在Medion的在线商店购买。.对于这个价格,你得到的不仅仅是32GB的双通道内存(2 x 16GB DDR5-4800),还有1TB的NVMe存储。这款笔记本电脑采用酷睿i7-12700H,这是一款在游戏笔记本电脑中非常受欢迎的14核处理器。正如一开始提到的,苛刻的图形处理是由英特尔的Arc A730M处理的--一个中档的GPU,主要是为了与 GeForce RTX 3060Radeon RX 6600M.这款笔记本电脑还配备了哑光165Hz显示屏,长宽比为16:10,分辨率为2,560 x 1,600。Windows 11家庭版使整个软件包更加完善。

Medion Erazer Major X10 (Erazer Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc A730M - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2050 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 30.0.101.1736, Switchable Graphics
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB of SODIMM DDR5-4800, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AUO B160QAN03.H, IPS, QHD+, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 Combined (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 359 x 265
Battery
80 Wh, 5195 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 300 W power supply, Medion Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.51 kg, Power Supply: 880 g
Price
1700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Major X10正在与其他中端游戏笔记本电脑竞争,如华硕TUF F17 FX707Z-HX011W,Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R(两者都有RTX 3060;一个有较高的TGP,另一个有平均的TGP)和HP Omen 16-c0077ng(RX 6600M)。据称较慢的 戴尔 Inspiron 16 Plus 7620配有GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的戴尔Inspiron 16 Plus 7620也同样被列入对比表。我们将在后面的评论中解释原因。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
09/2022
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M
2.5 kg31 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.1 %
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.9 %
08/2022
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg28.6 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
08/2022
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18.99 mm16.00"3072x1920
86 %
04/2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440

底盘

从外观上看,Major X10让我们想起了联想的Legion 系列。Medion公司选择使用哑光的黑色底盘和铝制的盖子。在我们看来,机箱感觉很结实,尽管当你用力时,底座部分肯定会在某些地方弯曲,而且盖子可以更结实一些(就像大多数笔记本电脑的情况一样)。显示器可以打开到180°,这对笔记本电脑来说是相当不寻常的。铰链的工作没有任何问题。例如,该设备可以用一只手轻松打开。Medion公司为这台笔记本电脑配备了许多照明元素,使其对游戏玩家具有吸引力。除了键盘之外,盖子上的标志和两侧后部的十字线在视觉上也很突出。键盘上方的通风口采用了十字线设计,以补充整体的美感。

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

Major X10有一个非常好的配合和完成。在我们的评测单元上,所有的表面都整齐地连接在一起。在2.5公斤(5.5磅),这个16英寸的设备对于游戏笔记本电脑来说既不轻也不特别重。作为比较,稍大的华硕TUF F17和宏碁Nitro 5 AN517分别重2.5公斤(5.5磅)和3.1公斤(6.8磅),而16英寸的竞争对手Omen 16和Inspiron 16 Plus则稍轻一些,分别为2.3公斤(5.1磅)和2.1公斤(4.6磅)。根据制造商的说法,Major X10的厚度为2.7厘米(1.06英寸),不含脚垫,3.1厘米(1.22英寸)。

尺寸比较

400.5 mm 294 mm 28.6 mm 3.1 kg394 mm 264 mm 25 mm 2.5 kg370 mm 245 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 265 mm 31 mm 2.5 kg356.78 mm 251.9 mm 18.99 mm 2.1 kg

特点

接口

如果你不介意没有Thunderbolt端口和读卡器,你会对笔记本的端口选择感到满意。有三个USB A型接口和两个C型接口(与DisplayPort兼容),除了一个以外,都支持3.2 Gen 2标准。这款笔记本电脑还配备了一个组合音频插孔(耳机和麦克风),一个RJ45以太网端口和一个HDMI 2.0输出。由于最重要的端口位于笔记本电脑的背面,你不必担心在使用外部鼠标进行游戏时,你的行动会受到很大限制。

在左边。USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
在左边。USB-A 3.2 Gen 2,3.5毫米音频插孔
在后面。RJ45以太网,1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,HDMI 2.0,电源端口
在后面。RJ45以太网,1个USB-A 3.2 Gen 1,HDMI 2.0,电源端口
在右边:2个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括DisplayPort),USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
在右边:2个USB-C 3.2 Gen 2(包括DisplayPort),USB-A 3.2 Gen 2

连接性

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,没有任何惊喜(笔记本电脑距离我们的参考路由器华硕AXE11000 1米)。该设备内部的英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201模块提供了高传输速度,符合预期。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1734 (1678min - 1748max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=37)
1477 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1769, n=44, last 2 years)
1467 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1481 (1366min - 1520max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (740 - 1780, n=37, last 2 years)
1374 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (745 - 1715, n=32)
1322 MBit/s ∼89% -11%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1678-1748)
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (1366-1520)

网络摄像头

Medion可以做一个更好的网络摄像头。尽管网络摄像头比许多竞争对手略微清晰和快速,但它在色彩准确性方面有所欠缺,这与许多笔记本电脑上的内置网络摄像头很相似。

ColorChecker
16 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Major X10: 15.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.25 ∆E

辅料

我们的评测装置只配备了一个300瓦的电源,尺寸约为20 x 9 x 2厘米(7.9 x 3.5 x 0.8英寸)。

维护

该设备的内部可以以与大多数游戏笔记本电脑相同的方式进行维护。从底部卸下11颗十字螺丝后,你可以将底盖从笔记本上抬起来。因为有夹子将盖子固定住,所以你需要用一个平坦的工具施加很大的力量来做。在机箱内部,你会发现两个SODIMM插槽,两个M.2插槽(都位于盖子下面),无线模块和电池。冷却系统由两个风扇组成,共用几根热管。

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

担保

Erazer Major X10有24个月的保修期。

输入设备

键盘

这款16英寸的笔记本电脑采用了一个带有完整数字键盘的小圆盘,其按键比其他地方略窄。与许多其他制造商不同,Medion决定使用大小合适的方向键,而不是那些小的方向键--一些游戏玩家会对此感到高兴。我们也喜欢这款键盘的布局,它主要坚持了标准的QWERTZ设计。亮点之一是具有可调亮度水平的四区RGB照明。有几种模式可供选择,让你定制照明。对于游戏笔记本来说,键盘的打字感觉很好,也就是说,它给你足够的反馈。

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

触摸板

对触摸板也没有什么可抱怨的。尺寸约为12 x 6.5厘米(4.7 x 2.6英寸),由于其相当光滑的表面,它可以让手指毫不费力地滑过,也没有表现出任何问题(例如,在精确度和手势方面)。只有底部的点击区域对我们来说有点太脆弱了,尽管足够结实。

显示

一流的显示屏是该设备的一个突出特点。现在,16:10面板在游戏笔记本中也越来越受欢迎。而Medion也在顺应这一趋势。

429
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B160QAN03.H
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 489 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.08 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.205
Medion Erazer Major X10
AUO B160QAN03.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Display
-42%
-15%
1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
70.4
40.2
-43%
58.9
-16%
70.8
1%
68.8
-2%
sRGB Coverage
98
59.7
-39%
86.4
-12%
99.5
2%
96.9
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.5
41.5
-43%
60.5
-17%
73.2
1%
71.1
-2%
Response Times
-273%
16%
-256%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.9 ?(6.5, 7.4)
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
-182%
6 ?(3, 3)
57%
38 ?(21.2, 16.8)
-173%
13 ?(6, 7)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
-363%
8 ?(4, 4)
-25%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-338%
10 ?(5, 5)
-56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-66%
-36%
9%
-30%
Brightness middle
489
287
-41%
286
-42%
288.9
-41%
297
-39%
Brightness
436
268
-39%
278
-36%
276
-37%
283
-35%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
89
9%
92
12%
91
11%
Black Level *
0.4
0.17
57%
0.32
20%
0.26
35%
0.22
45%
Contrast
1223
1688
38%
894
-27%
1111
-9%
1350
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.08
5.1
-145%
3.05
-47%
1.88
10%
3.25
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.27
8.72
-104%
5.83
-37%
4.37
-2%
6.33
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.27
5.1
-302%
3.13
-146%
0.42
67%
1.11
13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
4.24
-63%
3.17
-22%
1.4
46%
6.97
-168%
Gamma
2.205 100%
2.44 90%
2.29 96%
2.3 96%
2.3 96%
CCT
6797 96%
6008 108%
6916 94%
6634 98%
6050 107%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-127% / -90%
-12% / -24%
-82% / -30%
-19% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

友达制造的165Hz显示屏(型号B160QAN03.H)几乎在所有方面都很出色。首先,在峰值亮度方面,它超过了竞争对手。该面板的平均峰值亮度为436cd/m²,从而使Major X10相当适合在户外使用。作为比较,竞争对手甚至不能达到300cd/m²。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN:灰度(已校准)。
CalMAN:灰度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

第二,1,233:1的对比度对于IPS面板来说是非常好的。然而,这只足以使该笔记本电脑在我们的比较组中处于中间位置。也就是说,正如我们使用CalMan进行的测量所显示的那样(见截图),该显示器开箱后就已经有了相当的色彩准确性。它的色彩覆盖率应该能够满足大多数消费者--98%的sRGB覆盖率对于一台游戏笔记本来说是绰绰有余的。而且屏幕能够覆盖73%的AdobeRGB和70%的P3色彩空间。

Medion Erazer Major X10与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10与sRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10与AdobeRGB的对比
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs P3
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs P3

视角是典型的IPS面板。我们的测量设备报告的响应时间为6毫秒(黑到白)和14毫秒(灰到灰),相对于我们比较中的其他笔记本电脑,这同样不坏。然而,有点遗憾的是,在边缘有一些明显的IPS光晕。我们的评测单元的亮度分布仅为82%。

屏幕上的光
屏幕上的光
子像素阵列
子像素阵列
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.5 ms rise
↘ 7.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

业绩

虽然拥有32GB的内存和12GB的VRAM叫作高端,但由于Major X10的图形性能不甚理想,我们只能将其归类为中端机器(后面有更深入的分析)。以1,700欧元(1,728美元)的价格,整体包装不能真正被认为是一个伟大的交易。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

你可以在预装的控制中心软件中选择三个配置文件。除非另有说明,测量是在Major X10的游戏模式下进行的,这应该与其他笔记本电脑的性能模式相似。你可以在下表中找到各种配置文件的PL1和PL2设置。

控制中心
控制中心
控制中心

处理器

这台Medion笔记本电脑中的酷睿i7-12700H是英特尔Alder Lake系列中的最新一代10纳米处理器。这个高端选项提供6个性能和8个效率核心,并能使用超线程处理多达20个线程的并行运算。在我们一系列的CPU测试中,Major X10即使没有激活Turbo模式也表现良好。在Cinebench R15循环测试中,其性能稳定在一个相当稳定的水平,略高于12700H的竞争对手所能达到的水平。甚至 Ryzen 7 5800H在惠普Omen 16中也不能与这个性能水平相提并论。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2237 (2206.41-2384.22)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2176 (2139.15-2407.46)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1998 (1901.59-2430.28)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
81.6 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
80.9 pt ∼81%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
79.3 pt ∼79%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
77 pt ∼77%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
75 pt ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
 
69.8 pt ∼70%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.6 pt ∼57%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=56)
15698 Points ∼100% +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
14899 Points ∼95%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
14704 (12621.1min - 14704.4max) Points ∼94% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points ∼89% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
13774 Points ∼88% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23482, n=218, last 2 years)
13188 Points ∼84% -11%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points ∼78% -18%
Single Core
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
1822 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
1816 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1766 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=55)
1757 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1936, n=217, last 2 years)
1548 Points ∼85% -15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points ∼78% -22%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
6030 Points ∼100% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=56)
5937 Points ∼98% +7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5648 Points ∼94% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
5545 Points ∼92%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 9042, n=229, last 2 years)
5004 Points ∼83% -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points ∼80% -13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points ∼78% -15%
CPU (Single Core)
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
698 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points ∼99% -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=56)
678 Points ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 745, n=229, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼85% -15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼79% -21%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points ∼100% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=61)
2522 Points ∼89% +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
2430 (1901.59min - 2430.28max) Points ∼86% +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
2412 Points ∼86% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
2384 (2206.41min - 2384.22max) Points ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3652, n=227, last 2 years)
2119 Points ∼75% -11%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points ∼72% -15%
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼98% -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
254 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=56)
253 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 282, n=221, last 2 years)
236 Points ∼90% -10%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼87% -13%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
267 Seconds * ∼100% -23%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * ∼94% -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * ∼93% -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
235 Seconds * ∼88% -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
227 Seconds * ∼85% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=55)
225 Seconds * ∼84% -4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
217 Seconds * ∼81%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
62953 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=55)
60746 MIPS ∼96% -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
59929 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=225, last 2 years)
55039 MIPS ∼87% -13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS ∼87% -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
54224 MIPS ∼86% -14%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0 MIPS ∼0% -100%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
5907 MIPS ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
5756 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5907, n=55)
5627 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5570 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=225, last 2 years)
5554 MIPS ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
13515 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points ∼94% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
12157 Points ∼90%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
11887 Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=55)
11864 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=220, last 2 years)
9578 Points ∼71% -21%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points ∼54% -40%
Single-Core
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points ∼99% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=55)
1734 Points ∼97% -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1733 Points ∼97% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
1691 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=220, last 2 years)
1556 Points ∼87% -13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points ∼75% -25%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=56)
16.7 fps ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.4 fps ∼98%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.3 fps ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=229, last 2 years)
15.4 fps ∼92% -6%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps ∼91% -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps ∼84% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
9.06 fps ∼54% -45%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * ∼100% -95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * ∼93% -82%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 332, n=224, last 2 years)
52.2 s * ∼57% -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
50.7 s * ∼55% -7%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
47.4 s * ∼51%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.1 s * ∼50% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=55)
46 s * ∼50% +3%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=224, last 2 years)
0.536 sec * ∼100% -18%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * ∼96% -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.473 sec * ∼88% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=55)
0.4725 sec * ∼88% -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4679 sec * ∼87% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * ∼86% -2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4533 sec * ∼85%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15298
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
17026 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
130.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
131.96 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2384 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
200 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
263 Points
Help
Performance Rating
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
93.4 pt ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
 
82.2 pt ∼82%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
80.6 pt ∼81%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
78.4 pt ∼78%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
69.9 pt ∼70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
65.1 pt ∼65%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62 pt ∼62%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s ∼100% +91%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12734 KRay/s ∼87% +67%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 22183, n=192, last 2 years)
12283 KRay/s ∼84% +61%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=55)
10422 KRay/s ∼71% +37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7897 KRay/s ∼54% +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
7632 KRay/s ∼52%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s ∼47% -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points ∼100% +149%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=192, last 2 years)
66849 Points ∼73% +81%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63563 Points ∼69% +72%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=55)
50875 Points ∼55% +38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36924 Points ∼40% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
36879 Points ∼40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points ∼35% -12%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=192, last 2 years)
3110 MB/s ∼99% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=55)
3059 MB/s ∼97% +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2892 MB/s ∼92% +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2696 MB/s ∼86% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
2645 MB/s ∼84%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s ∼74% -12%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98875 Points ∼100% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
98756 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=55)
97639 Points ∼98% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 116406, n=192, last 2 years)
93549 Points ∼94% -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92646 Points ∼93% -6%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points ∼100% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=192, last 2 years)
10288 Points ∼87% +9%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
9397 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=55)
9092 Points ∼77% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9061 Points ∼77% -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8567 Points ∼72% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points ∼70% -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points ∼100% +136%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=192, last 2 years)
36463 Points ∼72% +70%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31113 Points ∼61% +45%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=55)
27280 Points ∼54% +27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21882 Points ∼43% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
21413 Points ∼42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points ∼37% -12%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s ∼100% +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 183146, n=192, last 2 years)
95725 MB/s ∼77% +69%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=55)
84090 MB/s ∼68% +49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65597 MB/s ∼53% +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56534 MB/s ∼46% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
56481 MB/s ∼46%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s ∼40% -12%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=55)
978 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
969 MB/s ∼99% +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
945 MB/s ∼97%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
919 MB/s ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s ∼83% -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s ∼80% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1408, n=213, last 2 years)
769 MB/s ∼79% -19%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s ∼100% +71%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6747 KRay/s ∼88% +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11913, n=192, last 2 years)
6668 KRay/s ∼87% +48%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=55)
5789 KRay/s ∼76% +29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4681 KRay/s ∼61% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
4491 KRay/s ∼59%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s ∼51% -13%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
38760 MPixel/s ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35147 MPixel/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=55)
33819 MPixel/s ∼87% -13%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 48269, n=192, last 2 years)
27040 MPixel/s ∼70% -30%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s ∼51% -49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19573 MPixel/s ∼50% -50%

系统性能

在系统性能方面,这台16英寸笔记本电脑在我们的比较中获得了第三名,在PCMark中获得了6830分的优异成绩。根据我们的主观印象,操作系统的反应速度和流畅性。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 8636, n=185, last 2 years)
6959 Points ∼97% +2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
6846 Points ∼96% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6830 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
 
6830 Points ∼96% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6651 Points ∼93% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points ∼84% -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
11116 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
 
11116 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
10172 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 11318, n=184, last 2 years)
10133 Points ∼91% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9784 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points ∼84% -16%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points ∼100% +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10932, n=184, last 2 years)
9150 Points ∼99% +26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9119 Points ∼99% +26%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9098 Points ∼99% +25%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
7260 Points ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
 
7260 Points ∼79% 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points ∼67% -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
10714 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
 
10714 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5288 - 14291, n=184, last 2 years)
9933 Points ∼93% -7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9409 Points ∼88% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8950 Points ∼84% -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1810 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2170, n=67, last 2 years)
1787 Points ∼99%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1740 Points ∼96%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points ∼91%
CrossMark / Productivity
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1766 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=67, last 2 years)
1726 Points ∼98%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1651 Points ∼93%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points ∼87%
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1916 Points ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2366, n=67, last 2 years)
1891 Points ∼96%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1886 Points ∼96%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1724 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=67, last 2 years)
1687 Points ∼98%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1523 Points ∼88%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points ∼70%
PCMark 10 Score
6830 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
61237 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 80511, n=55)
54669 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54375 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=192, last 2 years)
46883 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41426 MB/s ∼68% -32%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s ∼68% -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
65324 MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62046 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 79442, n=55)
58276 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=192, last 2 years)
50491 MB/s ∼77% -23%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43175 MB/s ∼66% -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
59407 MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57432 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 88660, n=55)
55630 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49644 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=192, last 2 years)
48205 MB/s ∼81% -19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s ∼69% -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * ∼100%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns * ∼91%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=55)
73.8 ns * ∼78%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 122, n=214, last 2 years)
66.1 ns * ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

正如笔记本电脑经常出现的情况一样,Major X10在延迟方面有一些问题。根据LatencyMon,该笔记本电脑只适合在有限的范围内进行实时音频和视频处理。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * ∼100% -36%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * ∼90% -23%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1710.5 μs * ∼74%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1038 μs * ∼45% +39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
989.5 μs * ∼43% +42%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Major X10内置的NVMe固态硬盘具有高于平均水平的速度,会让竞争对手感到紧张。它具有出色的连续读取和写入速度,分别超过5,000 MB/s和4,000 MB/s(使用AS SSD Benchmark获得)。还有第二个PCIe M.2插槽,如果将来需要,你可以方便地扩展存储。

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7091 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4708 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1043 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 763.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3442 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3125 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 83.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 319.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
91 pt ∼91%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.2 pt ∼70%
Average of class Gaming
 
60.9 pt ∼61%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
56.7 pt ∼57%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
49.3 pt ∼49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
36.9 pt ∼37%
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4572 (1938.92min - 4572max) MB/s ∼100% +28%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3582 (3181.8min - 3581.9max) MB/s ∼78%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 5568, n=180, last 2 years)
2798 MB/s ∼61% -22%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2746 (2728.19min - 2745.84max) MB/s ∼60% -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2355 (2335.33min - 2354.8max) MB/s ∼52% -34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s ∼39% -50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s ∼39% -50%
seq write
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4434 (4418.88min - 4433.95max) MB/s ∼100% +19%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3714 (3600.39min - 3714.27max) MB/s ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=179, last 2 years)
3018 MB/s ∼68% -19%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2786 (2776.21min - 2785.86max) MB/s ∼63% -25%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s ∼60% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s ∼60% -29%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2020 (1893.72min - 2020.34max) MB/s ∼46% -46%
seq q8 t1 read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6976 (5599.73min - 6976.39max) MB/s ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6792 (6372.24min - 6792.05max) MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=180, last 2 years)
4751 MB/s ∼68% -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s ∼50% -50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s ∼50% -50%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3503 (3178.09min - 3503.42max) MB/s ∼50% -50%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2569 (2176.89min - 2569.43max) MB/s ∼37% -63%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5091 (5070.42min - 5091.14max) MB/s ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
5011 (4994.03min - 5010.93max) MB/s ∼98%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 10261, n=180, last 2 years)
3639 MB/s ∼71% -27%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3016 (2902.04min - 3015.7max) MB/s ∼59% -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s ∼59% -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s ∼59% -40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2752 (2520.98min - 2752.46max) MB/s ∼54% -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
90.4 (89.34min - 90.39max) MB/s ∼100% +7%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
84.3 (83.89min - 84.32max) MB/s ∼93%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
62.7 (61.51min - 62.72max) MB/s ∼69% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=180, last 2 years)
62 MB/s ∼69% -26%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
48.8 (47.91min - 48.76max) MB/s ∼54% -42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s ∼36% -61%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s ∼36% -61%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
295 (292.45min - 295.27max) MB/s ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
236 (235.61min - 236.11max) MB/s ∼80% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s ∼73% -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s ∼73% -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)
193.8 MB/s ∼66% -34%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
162.6 (156.2min - 162.6max) MB/s ∼55% -45%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
144 (143.57min - 144.35max) MB/s ∼49% -51%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3551 (3538.39min - 3550.66max) MB/s ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2780 (2665.55min - 2779.85max) MB/s ∼78% -22%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s ∼62% -38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s ∼62% -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4483, n=179, last 2 years)
2176 MB/s ∼61% -39%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1798 (1787.41min - 1797.64max) MB/s ∼51% -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
652 (637.52min - 651.63max) MB/s ∼18% -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3398 (3342.89min - 3398.03max) MB/s ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s ∼68% -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s ∼68% -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2249 (2140.07min - 2249.23max) MB/s ∼66% -34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2142 (2133.48min - 2142.48max) MB/s ∼63% -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4383, n=179, last 2 years)
1991 MB/s ∼59% -41%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
408 (386.27min - 408.12max) MB/s ∼12% -88%
AS SSD
Score Total
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
8906 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9510, n=169, last 2 years)
6038 Points ∼68% -32%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5866 Points ∼66% -34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5514 Points ∼62% -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4577 Points ∼51% -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2529 Points ∼28% -72%
Score Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3464 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2363 Points ∼68% -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3629, n=169, last 2 years)
2255 Points ∼65% -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2182 Points ∼63% -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2121 Points ∼61% -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1190 Points ∼34% -66%
Score Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3707 Points ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (338 - 4522, n=169, last 2 years)
2662 Points ∼72% -28%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2325 Points ∼63% -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2324 Points ∼63% -37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1450 Points ∼39% -61%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
762 Points ∼21% -79%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5367 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
5200.42 MB/s ∼97%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 9971, n=169, last 2 years)
3846 MB/s ∼72% -26%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3148 MB/s ∼59% -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2693.29 MB/s ∼50% -48%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2656 MB/s ∼49% -49%
Seq Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
4309.4 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 8590, n=169, last 2 years)
2845 MB/s ∼66% -34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2565 MB/s ∼60% -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2535 MB/s ∼59% -41%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1904 MB/s ∼44% -56%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1683.46 MB/s ∼39% -61%
4K Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
97.3 MB/s ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
65.01 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 108, n=169, last 2 years)
60.8 MB/s ∼62% -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.97 MB/s ∼55% -45%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
52.1 MB/s ∼54% -46%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
28.83 MB/s ∼30% -70%
4K Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
294.39 MB/s ∼100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
203.81 MB/s ∼69% -31%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
197.81 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 364, n=169, last 2 years)
172.2 MB/s ∼58% -42%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
136.8 MB/s ∼46% -54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
59 MB/s ∼20% -80%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2846.23 MB/s ∼100%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1996 MB/s ∼70% -30%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1827 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (216 - 2963, n=169, last 2 years)
1810 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1591.21 MB/s ∼56% -44%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
855.48 MB/s ∼30% -70%
4K-64 Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2981.55 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (243 - 4008, n=169, last 2 years)
2217 MB/s ∼74% -26%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2011 MB/s ∼67% -33%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1931 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1055.78 MB/s ∼35% -65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
395.8 MB/s ∼13% -87%
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.086 ms * ∼100%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.078 ms * ∼91% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.075 ms * ∼87% +13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.066 ms * ∼77% +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.022 - 0.23, n=164, last 2 years)
0.06059 ms * ∼70% +30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.057 ms * ∼66% +34%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.06 ms * ∼100% -362%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.059 ms * ∼98% -354%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.012 - 0.425, n=169, last 2 years)
0.05854 ms * ∼98% -350%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.027 ms * ∼45% -108%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.021 ms * ∼35% -62%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.013 ms * ∼22%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10: Ø6972 (5977.93-7028.19)

图形卡

我们已经来到了Major X10最有趣的部分:它的显卡。这是英特尔Arc A730M(24个Xe核心和24个光线追踪单元)首次出现在我们的测试平台上。当涉及到合成图形基准时,英特尔GPU是一个出色的表现者。在3DMark测试中,它明显超过了GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,与GeForce RTX 3060和Radeon RX 6600M处于同一水平。启用Turbo模式后,Medion笔记本电脑能够从GPU中获得多出近20%的性能,并在我们的比较中加速超过其他设备。更多基准测试结果可以在 我们关于Arc A730M的页面.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.7 pt ∼98%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
96.5 pt ∼97%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1!
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
92.5 pt ∼93%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.7 pt ∼92%
Average Intel Arc A730M
 
89.3 pt ∼89%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
84.4 pt ∼84%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
82 pt ∼82%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
55.2 pt ∼55%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 45050, n=212, last 2 years)
32432 Points ∼100% +21%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
31859 Points ∼98% +19%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
31466 Points ∼97% +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30335 Points ∼94% +13%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (26822 - 31466, n=2)
29144 Points ∼90% +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
28009 Points ∼86% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
26822 Points ∼83%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
18679 Points ∼58% -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
24460 Points ∼100% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=229, last 2 years)
24333 Points ∼99% +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
23109 Points ∼94% +15%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
22409 Points ∼92% +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21574 Points ∼88% +7%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (20179 - 22409, n=2)
21294 Points ∼87% +6%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
20179 Points ∼82%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13760 Points ∼56% -32%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
10352 Points ∼100% +19%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (8677 - 10352, n=2)
9515 Points ∼92% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13835, n=229, last 2 years)
9448 Points ∼91% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9000 Points ∼87% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
8677 Points ∼84%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8342 Points ∼81% -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
8207 Points ∼79% -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5352 Points ∼52% -38%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 8462, n=141, last 2 years)
5820 Points ∼100% +27%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
5678 Points ∼98% +24%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (4588 - 5678, n=2)
5133 Points ∼88% +12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4789 Points ∼82% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
4588 Points ∼79%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
46579 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
63844 points
3DMark 11 Performance
24223 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
119799 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
44757 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18543 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9041 points
Help

游戏性能

相比之下,GPU在游戏基准测试中的情况非常复杂。即使A730M有时能够挑战RTX 3060和RX 6600M,但它经常只是徘徊在GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的性能水平,这通常出现在更便宜的游戏笔记本电脑中。在最坏的情况下,A730M甚至比RTX 3050 Ti还慢。考虑到GPU的价格和规格(12GB对4GB的VRAM),这是相当令人失望的。英特尔真的应该继续改善驱动支持。与我们在iGPU中看到的情况类似,一些游戏运行时出现了视觉伪影或其他杂项问题。我们还不得不处理偶尔的崩溃问题。也就是说,图形切换似乎工作良好。我们测试中使用的所有游戏都是直接分配给dGPU的。从根本上说,Arc A730M或多或少是为全高清显示器设计的。在1,920 x 1,080的分辨率下,几乎所有游戏在细节设置为高或非常高的情况下都能顺利运行。同时,更高的分辨率(如原生的2,560 x 1,600)使英特尔GPU达到极限。关于更多的GPU比较,你可以查看我们的游戏列表.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 268, n=168, last 2 years)
167.4 fps ∼100% +47%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
159 fps ∼95% +39%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
154 (18.3min, 38.2P0.1, 89.8P1) fps ∼92% +35%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H
135 fps ∼81% +18%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H
114 (101min) fps ∼68%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
108.4 (94min) fps ∼65% -5%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 130.6, n=225, last 2 years)
91.8 fps ∼100% +86%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
86.1 fps ∼94% +74%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H
84 fps ∼92% +70%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
83 (16.2min, 27.8P0.1, 56.4P1) fps ∼90% +68%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
57 (53min) fps ∼62% +15%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H
49.4 (40min