Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Air M2入门评测--非常好,但太贵的日常MacBook

M2的效率不如M1。 经过近两年的时间,MacBook Air M1终于有了一个继任者,它是专门为Apple"自己的芯片 "设计的。配备M2 CPU的新Air的价格也更高,因为配备8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的入门级设备起价为1299美元。这个价格是否合理?
Apple ARM Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt Ultrabook

旧的MacBook Pro 13配备新的Apple M2芯片,几周前推出,现在我们终于得到完全重新设计的MacBook Air M2。新的空气有很大的作用,因为以前的MacBook Air M1是过去两年中最好的紧凑型笔记本电脑之一。Apple ,希望通过一个完全重新设计的机箱继续这个成功故事,该机箱是为Apple"自己的M2处理器开发的。新的显示屏现在支持更大的P3色域,就像更大的MacBook Pro机型一样,而且面板更亮,你会得到新的扬声器,有一个1080p网络摄像头,流行的MagSafe连接器也回来了。然而,新机型的起价要高得多,基本机型为1199美元,只有8GB内存和256GB SSD存储。

似乎Apple ,也没有真正确定定价,仍然提供配备较慢的7核GPU的MacBook Air M1(目前),最有可能提供1000美元范围的产品。我们想了解新的MacBook Air M2的使用情况,被动冷却方案如何处理新的M2芯片,以及你在日常工作中是否真的注意到较慢的256GB SSD。

我们回顾了新的午夜色的MacBook Air M2的基本型号,我们在Apple's在线商店购买的(没有新闻单位)。如果你得到所有选项(24GB内存,2TB固态硬盘),新Air M2的价格将上升到2499美元。我们的编辑部目前也有一台MacBook Air M2,配备更快的10核GPU、16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘;相应的评论将很快发表。

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Processor
Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 9.5 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Core: 1398 MHz, 10 W TDP
Memory
8192 MB 
, LPDDR5-6400, onboard
Display
13.60 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1664 pixel 225 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP0256Z, 256 GB 
, 216 GB free
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.3 x 304.1 x 215
Battery
52.6 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Apple macOS 12 Monterey
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 30W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.215 kg, Power Supply: 174 g
Price
1499 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
92.3 %
07/2022
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2, M2 8-Core GPU
1.2 kg11.3 mm13.60"2560x1664
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600
91.9 %
06/2022
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
1.4 kg15.6 mm13.30"2560x1600
86.9 %
07/2022
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg15.3 mm13.40"3840x2400
90.1 %
07/2022
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
1.1 kg14.9 mm13.30"2880x1800
88.8 %
02/2022
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg16.5 mm13.40"2520x1680
87.8 %
01/2022
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
R7 5800U, Vega 8
1.3 kg14.9 mm13.30"1920x1200

案例--新的MacBook Air M2更轻薄、更大

Apple 没有使用老款的熟悉设计楔形底座的MacBook Air新的MacBook Air M2的基本设计与其他MacBook机型并不相似。机箱高度在前面和后面是相同的,新的Air非常薄,只有11.3毫米。旧款Air的正面更薄,但背面更厚。如果你以前使用过MacBook Pro,你知道底座的锋利边缘会很快在你的手腕上留下痕迹,这可能会让人感到不舒服。我们认为这在这里也可能是一个问题,但幸运的是,底座单元非常薄,我们没有任何问题。

由于前面的凹陷和调整良好的铰链,用一只手打开盖子非常容易。该设备使用熟悉的键盘,带有标准高度的功能键和当前的Touch-ID指纹扫描仪。与目前的MacBook Pro 14不同的是,各个按键之间的空间不是黑色的,而是仍然采用机箱颜色。带有圆角的盖子设计也与MBP 14.总而言之,我们不得不说Apple ,使用了相对较宽的边框,尤其是在显示屏下方,机身与屏幕的比例 "只有 "84%(我们还没有减去缺口)。

更薄的设计并不影响稳定性和质量印象。底座和盖子都非常结实,几乎没有任何凹陷或扭曲。我们也没有设法引起图片失真。铰链调整得很好,没有明显的弹跳,但最大打开角度被限制在130度左右。

蓝色的表面很容易留下指纹。
蓝色的表面很容易留下指纹。

除了熟悉的银色和太空灰,Apple ,还提供MacBook Air M2的两种新颜色选择,即Midnight和Starlight。我们购买的是Midnight版本,这是一种深蓝色,根据光线的不同,几乎看起来是黑色的。这种颜色在照片上和打开盒子时看起来很好,但表面极易受到指纹和灰尘的影响,几乎不可能保持清洁。USB-C接口很快就会出现一些划痕,由于颜色较深,与其他版本相比更明显。新的星光型号(明亮的银色,略带金色的色调)在这方面要好得多,与我们熟悉的银色和太空灰的颜色相似。

午夜与星光
午夜与星光

新的MacBook Air M2实际上比以前略深,而且占地面积也比以前略大。MacBook Air M1甚至是MacBook Pro 13 M2.然而,得益于薄薄的机身和圆润的边角,新MacBook仍然给人留下非常紧凑的印象。

华硕Zenbook S 13 VS.Apple MacBook Air M2 VS. Dell XPS 13 Plus
华硕Zenbook S 13 VS.Apple MacBook Air M2 VS. Dell XPS 13 Plus

一些竞争对手在这方面表现出色,包括新的戴尔XPS 13 Plus以及华硕Zenbook S 13.如果你经常在狭小的空间工作(如火车、飞机),这可能是一个重要的区别。

尽管机箱稍大,Apple ,设法减少新的空气M2的重量为1.215公斤,所以它是约60克轻比 前代产品,尽管你几乎不会注意到这一点。一些竞争对手更重,只有Zenbook S 13明显更轻,约为1.1公斤(或非触摸SKU分别为约1公斤)。MacBook Air M2的紧凑型30W电源适配器的重量为174克,包括MagSafe电缆。

尺寸比较

304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 15.6 mm 1.4 kg304.1 mm 215 mm 11.3 mm 1.2 kg299 mm 210 mm 14.9 mm 1.3 kg297.2 mm 218.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.3 kg296.7 mm 210.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg295.3 mm 199 mm 15.3 mm 1.2 kg

连接性--MagSafe回来了,但Wi-Fi仍然限制在80兆赫以内

Thunderbolt控制器
Thunderbolt控制器

MacBook Air M2在左侧配备了一个MagSafe接口,可以用来为设备充电(通过USB-C充电也仍然可以)。然而,在其他方面,与旧款MacBook Air M1相比,没有什么变化。MacBook Air M1,因为新的M2芯片仍然限于Thunderbolt 3,而且你只能连接一个外部屏幕(最高6K @60 Hz)。两侧各有一个USB-C接口也会更方便。

MagSafe连接器回来了。
MagSafe连接器回来了。
Air M2通过USB-C在4K屏幕上运行良好。
Air M2通过USB-C在4K屏幕上运行良好。
左侧。MagSafe,2个USB-C 4.0(Thunderbolt 3,40Gbps,Power Delivery,DisplayPort-Alt模式)。
左侧。MagSafe,2个USB-C 4.0(Thunderbolt 3,40Gbps,Power Delivery,DisplayPort-Alt模式)。
右侧:3.5毫米立体声插孔
右侧:3.5毫米立体声插孔

沟通

就像以前的MacBook Air M1新的M2 SoC再次被限制在80MHz的Wi-Fi(802.11ax)。没有对更快的160MHz网络或Wi-Fi 6E的支持,而蓝牙也仅限于旧的5.0标准。考虑到高昂的价格,你没有得到最新的标准,这很令人恼火。

考虑到80兆赫的限制,传输速率仍然很好,我们也可以看到华硕新的参考路由器(AXE1100)的改进,因为结果稳定在850-950Mbps之间,但新的Air M2的速度比MacBook Pro 13 M2和旧的MacBook Air M1。另一方面,一些Windows对手的速度达到了1.5Gbps以上。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1317 (1123min - 1404max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (180 - 1614, n=84, last 2 years)
1023 MBit/s ∼78%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
909 (814min - 1010max) MBit/s ∼69%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (405 - 1750, n=103)
787 MBit/s ∼60%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
552 (257min - 620max) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1258 (1143min - 1362max) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1248 (680min - 1346max) MBit/s ∼99%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (182 - 1690, n=84, last 2 years)
1136 MBit/s ∼90%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (284 - 1414, n=103)
765 MBit/s ∼61%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
672 (614min - 682max) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1558 (1401min, 1409.7P1 - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +80%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (1365min - 1583max) MBit/s ∼96% +72%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (343 - 1558, n=6, last 2 years)
1102 MBit/s ∼71% +27%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1499, n=33)
873 MBit/s ∼56% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
865 (856min, 856.29P1 - 874max) MBit/s ∼56%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
797 (751min - 821max) MBit/s ∼51% -8%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1662 (1600min - 1681max) MBit/s ∼100% +76%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1553 (1443min - 1620max) MBit/s ∼93% +64%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (353 - 1662, n=6, last 2 years)
1166 MBit/s ∼70% +23%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
945 (924min, 924.87P1 - 968max) MBit/s ∼57%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
828 (753min - 878max) MBit/s ∼50% -12%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1383, n=33)
821 MBit/s ∼49% -13%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø865 (856-874)
; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø945 (924-968)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头的情况类似于较大的MacBook Pro 14和Apple ,为新Air M2配备了一个1080p的传感器。结合M2的图像处理,效果其实还可以,但考虑到凹槽的大小,我们很确定iPad上的一个更大的传感器(支持中心舞台)也会适合。

ColorChecker
3.7 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry: 5.88 ∆E min: 1.75 - max: 11.28 ∆E

维护

夹子和金属托架固定底板。
夹子和金属托架固定底板。

拆除底板是很棘手的。你需要一个相应的Pentalobe螺丝刀(P5)和一个我们建议使用的吸盘。前面和侧面都有夹子,必须要松开,还有四个额外的固定装置。卸下螺丝后,我们建议将吸盘放在触控板区域的下方,然后用力拉动以松开夹子。之后,你可以将面板滑向前面,并将其取下。

不过,这样做其实没有什么好的理由。因为没有你可以清洗的风扇,而且所有的组件都被粘在或焊接在逻辑板上,所以没有什么你可以做的。

底板内侧
底板内侧
内部布局
内部布局

输入设备 -Apple 使用熟悉的魔法键盘

我们可以对键盘和触控板保持简短,因为没有什么可谈的。Apple ,现在使用我们已经从较大的MacBook Pro型号中知道的标准高度的功能键,包括目前的电源按钮的Touch-ID设计。键盘本身提供了精确的打字体验,但键程仍然很浅。不过你会习惯的,考虑到纤细的基本单元,打字体验还是不错的。相比之下MacBook Air M1相比,新键盘给人留下的印象是略微更坚实、更精确,但差异不大。背景照明仍然很好,通过传感器进行的精细调节仍然是无可匹敌的。

触控板也和以前一样好用,与操作系统的整合也很完美。它仍然是移动领域中最好的触控板。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示器 - 带有P3和凹槽的Air

新款MacBook Air M2现在有一个中央显示屏凹槽,可以容纳传感器以及网络摄像头,我们已经从较大的MacBook Pro机型中了解到。凹槽旁边的区域用于macOS菜单栏,额外的垂直像素(64)被添加到常规的16:10面板上,因此与MacBook Air M1相比,你得到的屏幕空间略多。MacBook Air M1.你还可以选择在全屏模式下使用应用程序时隐藏菜单栏,所以你基本上只看到16:10的屏幕。偶尔还是会有兼容性问题,但总的来说效果不错,你也会习惯这个凹槽。

除了2560 x 1664像素的略高分辨率,Apple ,还提升了液体视网膜面板(IPS)的其他规格。亮度像MBP 13一样攀升到500尼特,面板现在支持更广泛的P3色域。我们可以确认更高的亮度,但黑值(0.38)相对较高,所以对比度 "只有 "1400:1。

主观的画质非常好,尽管现代的OLED屏幕和较大的Mini-LED面板的MacBook Pro型号的Mini-LED面板提供更清晰的图像。然而,新的MacBook Air M2没有显示出PWM闪烁的迹象,这对一些用户来说肯定是一个优势。高还原度的Windows笔记本电脑仍然遭受偶尔的缩放问题,这对macOS来说绝对不是问题。像精确工作的自动亮度控制或True Tone等功能都非常方便。响应时间对于IPS屏幕来说是不错的,可视角度的稳定性也非常好。在最高亮度下,只有在黑暗的画面上有轻微的背光渗出,这其实并不重要。

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
只有轻微的背光渗漏
只有轻微的背光渗漏
视角稳定
视角稳定
458
cd/m²
463
cd/m²
457
cd/m²
507
cd/m²
526
cd/m²
493
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
480
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 526 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 486 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1384:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
87.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
LQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.40
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
TL134GDXP02-0, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
M133NW4JR0, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.30
Display
-1%
0%
-12%
4%
-22%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
98.4
98.6
0%
98.8
0%
76.5
-22%
99.8
1%
65.2
-34%
67.5
-31%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
92
-8%
97.1
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.6
85.9
-2%
87.9
0%
76
-13%
97.8
12%
67.5
-23%
68.8
-21%
Response Times
1%
-20%
-3%
94%
-14%
-47%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
32.9 ?(17.8, 15.1)
31 ?(14, 17)
6%
42 ?(19.9, 22.1)
-28%
38.9 ?(21.4, 17.5)
-18%
2.1 ?(1.1, 1)
94%
44.8 ?(22, 22.8)
-36%
53.2 ?(25.6, 27.6)
-62%
Response Time Black / White *
24.9 ?(10.4, 14.5)
26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2)
-5%
27.8 ?(14.1, 13.7)
-12%
21.9 ?(11.9, 10)
12%
1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82)
93%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
8%
32.8 ?(16.4, 16.4)
-32%
PWM Frequency
118000 ?(49, 155)
117780 ?(56)
240.4 ?(53)
9804 ?(20, 47)
Screen
-5%
11%
-36%
108%
-25%
-7%
Brightness middle
526
417
-21%
514
-2%
494
-6%
336
-36%
468
-11%
379
-28%
Brightness
486
395
-19%
497
2%
474
-2%
338
-30%
450
-7%
356
-27%
Brightness Distribution
87
91
5%
93
7%
89
2%
99
14%
92
6%
88
1%
Black Level *
0.38
0.39
-3%
0.31
18%
0.28
26%
0.02
95%
0.23
39%
0.23
39%
Contrast
1384
1069
-23%
1658
20%
1764
27%
16800
1114%
2035
47%
1648
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.12
14%
1.1
15%
3.1
-138%
1.8
-38%
2
-54%
1.6
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.71
-0%
2.3
15%
4.2
-56%
3.8
-41%
5.5
-104%
2.7
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.7
0.77
-10%
0.6
14%
1.5
-114%
1.8
-157%
1.5
-114%
1
-43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
1.7
15%
1.8
10%
3.2
-60%
0.9
55%
2.6
-30%
2
-0%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2207 0%
2.23 99%
2.41 91%
2.22 99%
2.17 101%
2.25 98%
CCT
6858 95%
6870 95%
6764 96%
6189 105%
6580 99%
6511 100%
6835 95%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / -3%
-3% / 4%
-17% / -26%
69% / 84%
-20% / -23%
-24% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(参考色彩空间P3)
CalMAN灰度(参考色彩空间P3)
CalMAN 饱和度扫描(参考色彩空间 P3)
CalMAN 饱和度扫描(参考色彩空间 P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker(参考色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(参考色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(参考色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(参考色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(参考色彩空间P3)
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(参考色彩空间P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(参考色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(参考色彩空间P3)。

显示器校准已经相当不错了,与P3参考色彩空间相比,色彩偏差已经在理想的范围内(较小的3),但我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行测量时,仍然发现有轻微的偏蓝/偏绿的色彩,同时色温略低。你可能不会注意到这一点,特别是如果你使用真实色调。

我们自己的校准(配置文件可以在上面的方框中免费下载)可以进一步提高性能,也可以消除偏色。P3的色域几乎被完全覆盖。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 10.4 ms rise
↘ 14.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (23.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
32.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.8 ms rise
↘ 15.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (36.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19959 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Apple 传统上使用反射程度低的光面面板,所以只要你能避免光源的直接反射,在户外就能很好地工作。新款MacBook Air M2的最大亮度增加,显然也有帮助。

在阳光下
在阳光下

性能 -Apple M2和慢速SSD

MacBook Air有两种不同版本的新Apple M2芯片。你总是得到一个8个核心的CPU(4倍性能,4倍效率),但也有8个核心和10个核心的GPU(+100美元)。1199美元的基本型号只能得到8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘,Apple ,升级到16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘的费用各200美元。现在,新机型最多可提供24GB内存和2TB SSD存储。

概述
概述
设备信息
设备信息

处理器 -Apple M2

Apple M2概述 (图片: )Apple
Apple M2概述 (图片: )Apple

Apple M2的基本处理器架构与旧的M1相比没有变化。 旧的M1你仍然可以得到总共8个核心,分布在两个集群中(性能集群和效率集群,各4个核心)。Apple ,确实增加了最大时钟,可以高达 400MHz。然而,这需要额外的功率,我们将在下面看一下效率,但单核消耗从~3.7W增加到~5.3W,多核消耗从~15W增加到~20W。

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2: Ø955 (863.48-1215.33)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Ultra-Performance: Ø1512 (1481.98-1677.36)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Optimized: Ø1066 (983.94-1625.95)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Standard: Ø922 (913.26-969.84)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Performance: Ø958 (953.54-961.86)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U; max. Performance: Ø1583 (1402.03-1924.93)
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE AMD Ryzen 7 5800U: Ø1501 (1244.94-1690.47)

Cinebench R15没有在MacBook Air M2上原生运行,但我们的循环显示,新的Air可以比上一代保持最大性能的时间长一些。 前代产品.虽然在测试过程中,两台设备越来越接近,几分钟后的差异也不是很大。总而言之,在多核情况下,你必须预期性能下降约30%,但单核性能完全稳定。

我们专注于原生基准测试,如Cinebench R23和Geekbench 5,以进行性能比较。单核性能提高了7%,多核性能提高了约18%。由于更高的时钟,单核性能甚至比M1 Pro略好。M1 ProM1 Max芯片相比,单核结果甚至略好于较大的MacBook Pro机型。

CPU的性能在电池供电时没有变化,更多的基准测试列在我们的 技术部分.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CPU Performance Rating
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
87.1 pt ∼87%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
84.4 pt ∼84%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
82.8 pt ∼83%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -3!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
82.6 pt ∼83%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
75 pt ∼75%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
69.6 pt ∼70%
Average Apple M2
 
67.6 pt ∼68%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
64.3 pt ∼64%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
60.7 pt ∼61%
Average of class Subnotebook
 
58 pt ∼58%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
56.9 pt ∼57%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points ∼100% +43%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points ∼85% +21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
9743 Points ∼79% +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points ∼77% +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8745 Points ∼71% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
8667 Points ∼70%
Average Apple M2
  (8517 - 8745, n=3)
8643 Points ∼70% 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
8068 Points ∼65% -7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7409 (6401.39min - 7409.31max) Points ∼60% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (965 - 12181, n=88, last 2 years)
6253 Points ∼51% -28%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5186 Points ∼42% -40%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1678 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
1585 Points ∼94%
Average Apple M2
  (1580 - 1585, n=3)
1582 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1581 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points ∼91% -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points ∼91% -3%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1496 Points ∼89% -6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points ∼89% -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1430 Points ∼85% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (409 - 1796, n=86, last 2 years)
1354 Points ∼81% -15%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1218 Points ∼73% -23%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points ∼100% +82%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
3909 Points ∼96% +75%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
2995 Points ∼74% +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
2721 Points ∼67% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
2349 Points ∼58% +5%
Average Apple M2
  (2231 - 2349, n=3)
2295 Points ∼57% +3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (376 - 4704, n=104, last 2 years)
2252 Points ∼55% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
2231 Points ∼55%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1982 Points ∼49% -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 (Rosetta)
1863 Points ∼46% -16%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
648 Points ∼100% +200%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points ∼87% +161%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
560 Points ∼86% +159%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 690, n=105, last 2 years)
496 Points ∼77% +130%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
431 Points ∼67% +100%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 (Rosetta)
401 Points ∼62% +86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
393 Points ∼61% +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
381 Points ∼59% +76%
Average Apple M2
  (216 - 381, n=3)
326 Points ∼50% +51%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
216 Points ∼33%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U (max. Performance)
1925 Points ∼100% +58%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1691 Points ∼88% +39%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points ∼90% +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points ∼88% +39%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P (Ultra-Performance)
1677 (1481.98min - 1677.36max) Points ∼87% +38%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P (Optimized)
1626 (983.94min - 1625.95max) Points ∼84% +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (Rosetta 2)
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points ∼69% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1229 (1226.62min, 1226.74P1 - 1232.55max) Points ∼64% +1%
Average Apple M2
  (1212 - 1229, n=3)
1219 Points ∼63% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
1215 (863min - 1215max) Points ∼63%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 (Rosetta 2)
1020 (817min - 1020max) Points ∼53% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 2041, n=111, last 2 years)
1020 Points ∼53% -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H (Standard)
970 (913.26min - 969.84max) Points ∼50% -20%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H (Performance)
961 Points ∼50% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
240 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points ∼99% +7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
229 Points ∼95% +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
223 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Apple M2
  (222 - 223, n=3)
223 Points ∼93% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
222 Points ∼93%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (Rosetta 2)
210 Points ∼88% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points ∼87% -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 (Rosetta 2)
208 Points ∼87% -6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
208 Points ∼87% -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (70.1 - 256, n=103, last 2 years)
195.4 Points ∼81% -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
713 Seconds * ∼100%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
710 Seconds * ∼100% -0%
Average Apple M2
  (595 - 713, n=3)
642 Seconds * ∼90% +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 2650, n=102, last 2 years)
635 Seconds * ∼89% +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
595 Seconds * ∼83% +17%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
509 Seconds * ∼71% +29%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
391 Seconds * ∼55% +45%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
319 Seconds * ∼45% +55%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds * ∼43% +57%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro (Blender 3.0 Beta M1)
183.3 Seconds * ∼26% +74%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points ∼100% +40%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points ∼80% +11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
9817 Points ∼79% +10%
Average Apple M2
  (8951 - 8991, n=3)
8968 Points ∼72% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8962 Points ∼72% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
8951 Points ∼72%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points ∼61% -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7578 Points ∼61% -15%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
6995 Points ∼56% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1024 - 9817, n=101, last 2 years)
5457 Points ∼44% -39%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5402 Points ∼43% -40%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1937 Points ∼100% +1%
Average Apple M2
  (1914 - 1937, n=3)
1925 Points ∼99% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
1914 Points ∼99%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points ∼91% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points ∼91% -8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1727 Points ∼89% -10%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1723 Points ∼89% -10%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points ∼78% -21%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
1436 Points ∼74% -25%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1430 Points ∼74% -25%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (293 - 1937, n=101, last 2 years)
1359 Points ∼70% -29%

* ... smaller is better

我们还想看一下新的Apple M2的效率,并与M1进行比较。我们在两台机器上运行了Cinebench R23单核和多核,并记录了软件包的功率,这使我们能够比较效率。这些数字清楚地表明,性能的提高是基于更高的消耗数字(+42 %@单核,~41 %@多核),这意味着与M1相比,效率明显下降。M1 SoC.然而,即使M2在单核效率方面仍然明显领先于英特尔和AMD。与英特尔的Alder Lake芯片相比,其多核优势也仍然令人印象深刻,但AMD也不差,新的Ryzen 7 6800U.

Package Power Cinebench R23 Multi

05101520Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z: Ø21.2 (20.586-21.892)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z: Ø20.2 (19.771-20.587)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q: Ø13.2 (10.435-15.548)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256: Ø15 (14.567-15.459)
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Package Power Efficiency
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
407 Points per Watt ∼100% +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
403 Points per Watt ∼99% +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
298 Points per Watt ∼73% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
297 Points per Watt ∼73%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
219 Points per Watt ∼54% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
219 Points per Watt ∼54% -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
78.3 Points per Watt ∼19% -74%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
64 Points per Watt ∼16% -78%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
61.8 Points per Watt ∼15% -79%
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Package Power Efficiency
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
561 Points per Watt ∼100% +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
521 Points per Watt ∼93% +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
433 Points per Watt ∼77% +6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
409 Points per Watt ∼73%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
399 Points per Watt ∼71% -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
383 Points per Watt ∼68% -6%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
374 Points per Watt ∼67% -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 Points per Watt ∼43% -40%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
197.6 Points per Watt ∼35% -52%
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Single Package Power
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
29 Watt * ∼100% -443%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
26 Watt * ∼90% -387%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
19 Watt * ∼66% -256%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
7 Watt * ∼24% -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
7 Watt * ∼24% -31%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
5.34 (5.015min, 5.07638P1 - 5.962max) Watt * ∼18%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
5.31 (4.821min, 4.85076P1 - 5.943max) Watt * ∼18% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
3.75 (3.575min, 3.58115P1 - 4.763max) Watt * ∼13% +30%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
3.68 (3.133min, 3.17243P0.1, 3.50554P1 - 5.517max) Watt * ∼13% +31%
Power Consumption / Cinebench R23 Multi Package Power
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
57 Watt * ∼100% -169%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
44 Watt * ∼77% -108%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
31 Watt * ∼54% -46%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
28 Watt * ∼49% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
25 Watt * ∼44% -18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
21.2 (20.586min, 20.6038P1 - 21.892max) Watt * ∼37%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
20.2 (19.771min, 19.7734P1 - 20.587max) Watt * ∼35% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
15 (14.567min, 14.5839P1 - 15.459max) Watt * ∼26% +29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
13.2 (10.435min, 10.497P1 - 15.548max) Watt * ∼23% +38%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

这两款MacBook Pro 13 M2和新的MacBook Air M2都是反应极其灵敏和快速的设备。操作系统运行非常流畅,没有任何停顿,MacBook可以立即从待机状态唤醒。Apple silicon的本地应用程序启动非常快,包括像Adobe Photoshop、Premiere Pro或DaVinci Resolve这样的复杂应用程序。在CrossMark和浏览器测试等合成基准测试中,性能也非常好。

为了完整起见,我们再次包括了PugetBench的结果(Photoshop和Premiere Pro),但该基准只与英特尔版本的应用程序兼容,因此不能代表性能。英特尔版本也明显比原生版本更迟钝。

Air M2的基本型号使用相同的媒体引擎,因此甚至支持高分辨率视频的编辑,包括多个4K ProRes流的并行编辑。当你导出大文件时,你最终会注意到性能下降,但对于偶尔的项目(例如度假视频),性能完全足够。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Photoshop PugetBench: Filter Score | General Score | GPU Score | Overall Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: GPU | Live Playback | Export | Overall Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: ---
WebXPRT 4: Overall Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
CrossMark / Overall
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1667 Points ∼100% +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1507 Points ∼90% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1501 Points ∼90%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
1501 Points ∼90% 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points ∼89% -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1355 Points ∼81% -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1352 Points ∼81% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (926 - 1667, n=28, last 2 years)
1339 Points ∼80% -11%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1335 Points ∼80% -11%
CrossMark / Productivity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1575 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1476 Points ∼94% +8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1424 Points ∼90% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1382 Points ∼88% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1371 Points ∼87%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
1371 Points ∼87% 0%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1355 Points ∼86% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (962 - 1657, n=28, last 2 years)
1341 Points ∼85% -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1274 Points ∼81% -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1861 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1848 Points ∼99%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
1848 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1841 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1593 Points ∼86% -14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1554 Points ∼84% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (957 - 1861, n=28, last 2 years)
1411 Points ∼76% -24%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1395 Points ∼75% -25%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1261 Points ∼68% -32%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1425 Points ∼100% +35%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1418 Points ∼100% +34%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points ∼91% +23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (746 - 1593, n=28, last 2 years)
1159 Points ∼81% +10%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1118 Points ∼78% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1069 Points ∼75% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1055 Points ∼74%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
1055 Points ∼74% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1004 Points ∼70% -5%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
85 fps ∼100% +13%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
75 fps ∼88%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
75 fps ∼88% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (55 - 85, n=4, last 2 years)
73.8 fps ∼87% -2%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
24 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
24 fps ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
24 fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17 - 24, n=4, last 2 years)
22.3 fps ∼93% -7%
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
81.9 Points ∼100% +20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (42.7 - 86.9, n=5, last 2 years)
68.1 Points ∼83% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
68 Points ∼83%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
68 Points ∼83% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
61 Points ∼74% -10%
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
79.3 Points ∼100% +29%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
61.6 Points ∼78%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
61.6 Points ∼78% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32.1 - 79.3, n=5, last 2 years)
60.5 Points ∼76% -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
51 Points ∼64% -17%
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
83.8 Points ∼100% +19%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
70.2 Points ∼84%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
70.2 Points ∼84% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.2 - 83.8, n=5, last 2 years)
66.1 Points ∼79% -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
60.6 Points ∼72% -14%
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
806 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
648 Points ∼80%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
648 Points ∼80% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (374 - 828, n=5, last 2 years)
643 Points ∼80% -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
560 Points ∼69% -14%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
26.2 Points ∼100% +18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
22.2 Points ∼85%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
22.2 Points ∼85% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4.2 - 26.2, n=5, last 2 years)
18.2 Points ∼69% -18%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
14.3 Points ∼55% -36%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
81.8 Points ∼100% +110%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.7 - 81.8, n=5, last 2 years)
50.8 Points ∼62% +30%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
39 Points ∼48%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
39 Points ∼48% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
38.8 Points ∼47% -1%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
48 Points ∼100% +16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
41.5 Points ∼86%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
41.5 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.4 - 48, n=5, last 2 years)
35.4 Points ∼74% -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
25.8 Points ∼54% -38%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
537 Points ∼100% +60%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 537, n=5, last 2 years)
370 Points ∼69% +10%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
335 Points ∼62%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
335 Points ∼62% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
323 Points ∼60% -4%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
239.8 Points ∼100% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
227.4 Points ∼95% +1%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
226 Points ∼94% 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
225.9 Points ∼94%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211 Points ∼88% -7%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
199.8 Points ∼83% -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
191.3 Points ∼80% -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
178.7 Points ∼75% -21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
183.8 Points ∼77% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (50 - 250, n=43, last 2 years)
173.5 Points ∼72% -23%
WebXPRT 3 /
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
379 Points ∼100% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
377 Points ∼99%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
377 Points ∼99% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
304 Points ∼80% -19%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
281 Points ∼74% -25%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
288 Points ∼76% -24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
270 Points ∼71% -28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
249 Points ∼66% -34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (80.1 - 379, n=99, last 2 years)
234 Points ∼62% -38%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
233 Points ∼61% -38%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall Score
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
248 Points ∼100% +10%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
226 Points ∼91%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
226 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (186.4 - 248, n=5, last 2 years)
215 Points ∼87% -5%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
189 Points ∼76% -16%
Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
406.6 runs/min ∼100% +5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
386 runs/min ∼95%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
386 runs/min ∼95% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
265 runs/min ∼65% -31%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
213 runs/min ∼52% -45%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
204 runs/min ∼50% -47%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (42.9 - 407, n=26, last 2 years)
201 runs/min ∼49% -48%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
Vega 8, R7 5800U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
192.9 runs/min ∼47% -50%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
190 runs/min ∼47% -51%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
176 runs/min ∼43% -54%

存储设备

无定形磁盘标记
无定形磁盘标记

MacBook Pro 13 M2和MacBook Air M2的基本型号都配备了256GB固态硬盘,只有一个NAND芯片,因此与配备512GB固态硬盘(两个NAND芯片)的型号,甚至是旧款的基本型号相比,传输速率要低得多。MacBook Air M1.然而,我们不知道Apple ,Air M1是否也改用了较慢的驱动器。

对于你的日常东西来说,传输率基本上还是可以的,你可能甚至不会注意到任何限制,但是带有共享内存的M2芯片会在内存满的时候把数据放在固态硬盘(交换内存)上,这样就会导致性能降低。在我们的审查中,我们只在Adobe Premiere Pro PugetBench测试中真正注意到这一点,与配备1TB固态硬盘的MacBook Air M2相比,视频输出的时间要长很多。这真的取决于你打算如何使用Air M2。如果你同时运行多个应用程序或许多浏览器标签(尤其是Chrome等第三方浏览器),很可能会出现明显的性能下降。如果可能的话,你也应该使用本地应用程序,因为通过Rosetta 2模拟的应用程序也会需要更多的内存。如果你想拥有一台可用于未来几年的设备,我们肯定会推荐你升级到512GB,价格为200美元。

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
100 pt ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
59.9 pt ∼60%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple SSD AP0512
57.5 pt ∼58%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Q
52.5 pt ∼53%
Average of class Subnotebook
 
51.9 pt ∼52%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple SSD AP0256
50.3 pt ∼50%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
32.1 pt ∼32%
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
5448 MB/s ∼100% +269%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2819.3 MB/s ∼52% +91%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple SSD AP0256
2798 MB/s ∼51% +90%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Q
2756 MB/s ∼51% +87%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple SSD AP0512
2728 MB/s ∼50% +85%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1476 - 2819, n=6, last 2 years)
2562 MB/s ∼47% +74%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1475.8 MB/s ∼27%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
4463 MB/s ∼100% +170%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
3036.1 MB/s ∼68% +84%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple SSD AP0512
2895 MB/s ∼65% +75%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1653 - 3036, n=6, last 2 years)
2538 MB/s ∼57% +54%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Q
2431 MB/s ∼54% +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple SSD AP0256
2194 MB/s ∼49% +33%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1652.8 MB/s ∼37%

GPU性能

我们的基本型号的MacBook Air M2配备的是较慢的 8核GPU最大核心时钟为1398 MHz。在我们的测试中,最大功耗为~10W,因此与旧的8核M1 GPU相当。Apple ,仍然设法提高了GPU的性能,我们看到比8核M1 GPU的优势为~15 %。 8核M1 GPU有15%的优势,比基本的 7核M1 GPU在合成基准测试中的优势。10核M2 GPU 10核M2 GPU则快了约20%,而 14核M1 Pro GPU则明显更强大。

那么,这一切对你的标准日常应用程序意味着什么?8核M2 GPU对于你所有的日常工作来说是绰绰有余的,升级到10个GPU核心并不是真正必要的。除了GPU核心的数量,反正没有什么区别,所谓更快的GPU在持续工作负荷下甚至没有巨大的优势,这两种型号都会失去性能。更快的10核GPU甚至更快地失去了更多性能(22%),而基本型号 "只 "失去了14%。在我们的20分钟压力测试后,10核GPU的优势下降到只有9%,所以我们不建议升级GPU。

图形性能在电池电量上没有减少。请参阅我们的 技术部分了解更多GPU基准测试。

野生动物极端压力测试 (MBA M2 8C-GPU)
野生动物极端压力测试 (MBA M2 8C-GPU)
野生动物极端压力测试(MBA M2 10C-GPU)
野生动物极端压力测试(MBA M2 10C-GPU)
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10352 Points ∼100% +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points ∼90% +63%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6823 Points ∼66% +20%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
5689 Points ∼55%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
5689 Points ∼55% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
4997 Points ∼48% -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4515 Points ∼44% -21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4081 Points ∼39% -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1726 - 6824, n=13, last 2 years)
3931 Points ∼38% -31%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3793 Points ∼37% -33%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10351 Points ∼100% +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9089 Points ∼88% +60%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6728 Points ∼65% +19%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
5673 Points ∼55%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
5673 Points ∼55% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
4950 Points ∼48% -13%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1816 - 9727, n=12, last 2 years)
4552 Points ∼44% -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4487 Points ∼43% -21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4057 Points ∼39% -28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3827 Points ∼37% -33%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
24875 Points ∼100% +18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
21009 Points ∼84%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
21009 Points ∼84% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
17731 Points ∼71% -16%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
17731 Points ∼71% -16%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
16159 Points ∼65% -23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5964 - 24885, n=10, last 2 years)
15831 Points ∼64% -25%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
14403 Points ∼58% -31%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Subnotebook
  (39.8 - 48.6, n=2, last 2 years)
44.2 fps ∼100% +11%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
39.8 fps ∼90%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
39.8 fps ∼90% 0%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
166 fps ∼100% +82%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps ∼89% +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
109.8 fps ∼66% +21%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
91 fps ∼55%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
91 fps ∼55% 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
81.2 fps ∼49% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
78.2 fps ∼47% -14%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
72.4 fps ∼44% -20%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10 - 110, n=13, last 2 years)
61.4 fps ∼37% -33%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.8 fps ∼29% -47%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
436 fps ∼100% +77%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps ∼90% +60%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
295 fps ∼68% +19%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
247 fps ∼57%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
247 fps ∼57% 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
214.4 fps ∼49% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
207 fps ∼47% -16%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
192 fps ∼44% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (27 - 296, n=13, last 2 years)
162.9 fps ∼37% -34%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
120 fps ∼28% -51%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
345 fps ∼100% +73%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
316 fps ∼92% +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
229.9 fps ∼67% +15%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
199.9 fps ∼58%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
199.9 fps ∼58% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
197 fps ∼57% -1%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
176.6 fps ∼51% -12%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
162 fps ∼47% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (24 - 230, n=9, last 2 years)
157.6 fps ∼46% -21%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
109.3 fps ∼32% -45%
Geekbench 5.4
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
42115 Points ∼100% +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
37319 Points ∼89% +43%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30166 Points ∼72% +16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
26079 Points ∼62%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
26079 Points ∼62% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19064 - 30269, n=6, last 2 years)
24657 Points ∼59% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
21951 Points ∼52% -16%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
20411 Points ∼48% -22%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
19064 Points ∼45% -27%
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
37867 Points ∼100% +60%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points ∼93% +49%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
31996 Points ∼84% +35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27602 Points ∼73% +17%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
23633 Points ∼62%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
23633 Points ∼62% 0%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
20364 Points ∼54% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
19078 Points ∼50% -19%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
18352 Points ∼48% -22%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1594 - 64697, n=103, last 2 years)
17181 Points ∼45% -27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
17029 Points ∼45% -28%
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
15477 Points ∼41% -35%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
15303 Points ∼40% -35%

游戏性能

要评估MacBooks的游戏性能并不容易。有一些原生游戏(如《魔兽世界》),但即使如此,要可靠地记录fps数字也是一个问题。还有一些仿真游戏,如《古墓丽影》或《边疆3》,你甚至可以使用CrossOver等软件来玩Windows游戏,如《Witcher 3 》,但总是会有一些问题,如图形问题。在Mac上玩的最好方法是Apple's Arcade collection或流媒体服务。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
36 fps ∼100% +50%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25 fps ∼69% +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16 - 36, n=9, last 2 years)
24.3 fps ∼68% +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
24 fps ∼67%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
24 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
23 fps ∼64% -4%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
39 fps ∼100% +39%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
28 fps ∼72%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
28 fps ∼72% 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
27 fps ∼69% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25 fps ∼64% -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10.7 - 39, n=17, last 2 years)
23.1 fps ∼59% -17%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
22 (16min) fps ∼56% -21%
Total War: Three Kingdoms
1920x1080 High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
29 fps ∼100% +61%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25.5 fps ∼88% +42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17.4 - 36, n=9, last 2 years)
24 fps ∼83% +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
20.6 fps ∼71% +14%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
18 fps ∼62%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
18 fps ∼62% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
17.4 (15min) fps ∼60% -3%
1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
21 fps ∼100% +50%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (13 - 21, n=5, last 2 years)
16.5 fps ∼79% +18%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
14 fps ∼67%
Average Apple M2 8-Core GPU
 
14 fps ∼67% 0%
low med. high ultra
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 62 28 24 20
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 77 39 18 14
Borderlands 3 (2019) 43 29.7 16.6 13.4

排放 - 静音运行

系统噪音

新的MacBook Air M2再次使用被动冷却解决方案,因此没有恼人的风扇噪音。在我们审查期间,我们也没有注意到任何电子声音。

温度

Apple 尽管有被动冷却装置,但它的表面温度管理得非常好。在日常工作中,你通常只能注意到温热的表面,甚至在负载下的最高温度也没有超过45℃,这与旧型号相当。然而,芯片本身在多核负载情况下会变得相当热,达到108℃。

Max. Load
 42.6 °C44.5 °C38.3 °C 
 39.3 °C40.6 °C35.7 °C 
 33.4 °C29.9 °C32.1 °C 
Maximum: 44.5 °C
Average: 37.4 °C
40.4 °C44.4 °C42.3 °C
37.7 °C41.6 °C39.2 °C
33.5 °C34.2 °C34 °C
Maximum: 44.4 °C
Average: 38.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.1 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.8 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.4 to 58.4 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.1 °C / 95.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (-6.7 °C / -12.1 F).
表面温度顶部(压力测试)
表面温度顶部(压力测试)
表面温度底部(压力测试)
表面温度底部(压力测试)
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s G3 20YA0005GE
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Heat
-6%
-3%
-11%
-16%
-4%
5%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.5
44
1%
45.1
-1%
41.1
8%
47.9
-8%
42.8
4%
36.5
18%
Maximum Bottom *
44.4
44
1%
43
3%
48.8
-10%
56.1
-26%
46.9
-6%
39.6
11%
Idle Upper Side *
23.9
27
-13%
25.2
-5%
28
-17%
26.8
-12%
25.2
-5%
24.5
-3%
Idle Bottom *
23.6
27
-14%
25.4
-8%
29.3
-24%
27.3
-16%
26
-10%
25
-6%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

对CPU和GPU数据的分析清楚地表明,该芯片不断降低性能,最终在9分钟左右达到了9.5W的水平,这实际上与MacBook Air M1的水平,这一点在下图中也有清楚显示。在压力测试后,性能立即降低,芯片必须冷却后才能再次提供峰值性能。

压力测试开始
压力测试开始
压力测试结束
压力测试结束