Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2笔记本电脑评测--新 M2的首次亮相Apple

在一个熟悉的形状下有更多的性能。 我们仍需等待MacBook Air的全新重新设计,但Apple ,已经推出了配备新的Apple M2处理器的MacBook Pro 13的更新版本。其他方面的变化非常有限,因为显示屏以及包括Touch Bar在内的底盘都与之前的型号没有变化。
Apple ARM MacBook Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Ultrabook

有很多关于全面重新设计新MacBook Air的传言和猜测。 Apple's M2处理器的MacBook Air的全面重新设计。但第一台采用新M2 SoC的MacBook实际上是一个熟悉的伙伴,即MacBook Pro 13。它看起来就像 之前的型号配备了M1芯片,没有凹槽的13.3英寸显示屏是相同的,你可以得到与Touch Bar相结合的魔法键盘。2022年的MacBook Pro 13也没有获得MagSafe连接器。

Apple 只为MacBook Pro 13提供更快的M2版本,它有8个CPU核心和10个GPU核心,而新的MacBook Air M2的入门级型号则以较慢的8核心GPU发货。MBP 13采用主动冷却解决方案,因此与被动冷却的MacBook Air M2相比,性能应该更加稳定。

配备M2处理器的2022年MacBook Pro 13的价格从1299美元开始,配备256GB固态硬盘存储和8GB内存;我们的评测单元配备16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,售价1899美元。所有型号都采用相同的M2 SoC(8个CPU内核,10个GPU内核)。

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Processor
Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Core: 1398 MHz, 13.5 W TDP
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR5-6400, onboard
Display
13.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 227 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP1024R, 1024 GB 
, 956 GB free
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.6 x 304.1 x 212.4
Battery
58.2 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Apple macOS 12 Monterey
Camera
Webcam: FaceTime HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 67W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.372 kg, Power Supply: 274 g
Price
2289 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
91.9 %
06/2022
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
1.4 kg15.6 mm13.30"2560x1600
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1, M1 8-Core GPU
1.4 kg15.6 mm13.30"2560x1600
91.1 %
12/2020
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU
1.3 kg16.1 mm13.30"2560x1600
06/2022
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
1.1 kg14.9 mm13.30"2880x1800
86.7 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
885 g11 mm13.30"1920x1080
88.8 %
02/2022
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.3 kg16.5 mm13.40"2520x1680
88 %
06/2021
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg14.8 mm13.40"3456x2160

外壳 - 铝制MacBook没有变化

我们对MacBook Pro 13的铝制底盘非常了解,从以前的版本中可以看出。 以前的迭代但它的高品质和出色的制造质量仍然是伟大的。唯一略显过时的方面是一旦你打开盖子,边框的大小,尽管有16:10的长宽比屏幕,但对于现代的副笔记本来说,边框还是有点宽。

在质量或稳定性方面没有什么可批评的。铝合金表面的最大优势是它们不容易变脏或变油,而且MacBook通常在多年后只要稍加保养就会看起来非常好。

尺寸比较

304.1 mm 212.4 mm 16.1 mm 1.3 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 15.6 mm 1.4 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 15.6 mm 1.4 kg306 mm 200 mm 11 mm 885 g297.2 mm 218.4 mm 16.5 mm 1.3 kg296.7 mm 210.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg296 mm 199 mm 14.8 mm 1.2 kg

连接性 - MBP 13再次采用雷电3技术

2022年的MacBook Pro 13 M2没有获得MagSafe连接器,这意味着你再次被限制在左侧的两个USB-C端口。它们支持Thunderbolt 3和USB 4的完整40 GB/s(USB 3.1 Gen.2的10 GB/s),以及充电和DisplayPort。除了集成显示器外,MBP 13 M2只能以6K/60 Hz的速度驱动一个额外的外部屏幕。

左侧:2个Thunderbolt 3(USB-C 4,40 GB/s,Power Delivery,DisplayPort ALT模式)。
左侧:2个Thunderbolt 3(USB-C 4,40 GB/s,Power Delivery,DisplayPort ALT模式)。
右侧:3.5毫米立体声
右侧:3.5毫米立体声

沟通

新款Apple M2的Wi-Fi性能与M1相比没有真正的变化,很难令人信服。现代的Wi-Fi 6E标准不被支持,Wi-Fi 6连接只适用于80MHz频段,这意味着MacBook无法跟上160MHz Wi-Fi 6模块的传输速率。我们看到比以前的略有改善 MacBook Pro 13 M1结合华硕的新参考路由器,但传输速率仍然相当慢,约为800 Mbps。性能至少是稳定的,我们在审查期间没有注意到信号质量的任何问题,所以限制不是很大,除非你在个人网络中传输大型文件。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Subnotebook
  (180 - 1614, n=87, last 2 years)
1021 MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
909 (814min - 1010max) MBit/s ∼89%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (405 - 1750, n=103)
787 MBit/s ∼77%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
649 (611min - 664max) MBit/s ∼64%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
617 (220min - 685max) MBit/s ∼60%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
552 (257min - 620max) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (681min - 1483max) MBit/s ∼100%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1258 (1143min - 1362max) MBit/s ∼92%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (182 - 1690, n=87, last 2 years)
1133 MBit/s ∼83%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (284 - 1414, n=103)
765 MBit/s ∼56%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
757 (378min - 806max) MBit/s ∼55%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple AirPort Extreme M1
672 (614min - 682max) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1553 (1443min - 1620max) MBit/s ∼100% +88%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (828 - 1657, n=3, last 2 years)
1346 MBit/s ∼87% +63%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
828 (753min - 878max) MBit/s ∼53%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (417 - 1363, n=25)
793 MBit/s ∼51% -4%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1492 (1365min - 1583max) MBit/s ∼100% +87%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (797 - 1557, n=3, last 2 years)
1282 MBit/s ∼86% +61%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (498 - 1251, n=25)
854 MBit/s ∼57% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
797 (751min - 821max) MBit/s ∼53%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850Tooltip
; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (753-878)
; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø796 (751-821)

网络摄像头

虽然新的MacBook Air M2将获得一个1080p网络摄像头,但MBP 13仍然配备了我们从以前的迭代中了解到的720p FaceTime高清摄像头。它完成了自己的工作,但图片质量不是很有说服力。

ColorChecker
10.1 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2: 9.24 ∆E min: 4.92 - max: 14.38 ∆E

维护

用相应的Pentalobe螺丝刀拆卸底盖很容易,但你的维护工作仅限于清洁风扇。

内部布局 MacBook Pro 13 M2
内部布局 MacBook Pro 13 M2

输入设备 - 触摸条的寿命比预期长

输入设备也没有改变,这意味着2022年的MBP 13仍然配备了键盘上方的触摸条。这是最后一款配备小的触摸感应显示屏的机型,因此Apple ,接受它不过是一个噱头。所有其他MacBook型号再次配备了普通功能键。

在Apple ,在蝴蝶键实验后改回剪刀机构后,大多数用户应该对键盘感到满意,整体打字体验良好。背景照明的自动调节是一个非常方便的功能,提高了整体的用户体验。

大尺寸触控板仍然是移动领域的标杆,这也是出色的软件支持和与macOS整合的结果。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘照明
键盘照明

显示屏 - 没有凹槽的MacBook Pro 13

子像素布局
子像素布局
没有背光灯出血的问题
没有背光灯出血的问题

显示屏再次是熟悉的16:10 IPS屏幕,没有凹槽。这么多年过去了,主观的画质仍然很好。2560 x 1600像素的高分辨率确保了清晰的图像,色彩也不会令人失望。你还受益于自动亮度调节,效果非常好,还可以根据环境光线(True Tone)自动调节色温。macOS也没有任何缩放问题,这在采用高分辨率面板的Windows笔记本电脑上仍然是一个问题。

亮度的额定值为500尼特,我们的测试装置达到了514尼特(平均497尼特),结合0.31的体面黑值,这导致了超过1600:1的非常高的对比度。当面板亮度下降到56%及以下时,我们可以确定有闪烁现象,但这不是典型的PWM闪烁现象。117kHz的频率是非常高的,应该不会造成任何问题。响应时间对于IPS屏幕来说是不错的,我们没有注意到任何重影。

新款MacBook Air M2的显示屏 MacBook Air M2也将支持更宽的P3基准,其他规格也是相同的,只是外形尺寸略有不同(由于增加了垂直空间)。与较大的 配备Mini-LED面板的MacBook Pro机型相比,较小的MBP 13并不支持更宽的P3基准。较小的MBP 13不支持高达120赫兹的更高刷新率或HDR功能。

487
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
476
cd/m²
512
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
502
cd/m²
503
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
484
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 514 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 497.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1658:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
ATNA33XC10-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
TL134GDXP02-0, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Display
-1%
4%
3%
-22%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
98.8
98.6
0%
99.8
1%
99.81
1%
65.2
-34%
99.7
1%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
100
0%
92
-8%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.9
85.9
-2%
97.8
11%
95.55
9%
67.5
-23%
97.7
11%
Response Times
-0%
11%
26%
28%
-27%
29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(19.9, 22.1)
48 ?(18.8, 29.2)
-14%
31 ?(14, 17)
26%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
91%
4 ?(2, 2)
90%
44.8 ?(22, 22.8)
-7%
2.2 ?(1.2, 1)
95%
Response Time Black / White *
27.8 ?(14.1, 13.7)
25.2 ?(8.4, 16.8)
9%
26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2)
6%
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
88%
2 ?(1, 1)
93%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
18%
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
92%
PWM Frequency
117780 ?(56)
122000 ?(49)
4%
118000 ?(49, 155)
0%
240.4 ?(53)
-100%
61 ?(90)
-100%
9804 ?(20, 47)
-92%
240.4 ?(51)
-100%
Screen
-6%
-16%
74%
10%
-43%
-173%
Brightness middle
514
510
-1%
417
-19%
336
-35%
399
-22%
468
-9%
384
-25%
Brightness
497
491
-1%
395
-21%
338
-32%
403
-19%
450
-9%
387
-22%
Brightness Distribution
93
94
1%
91
-2%
99
6%
98
5%
92
-1%
97
4%
Black Level *
0.31
0.29
6%
0.39
-26%
0.02
94%
0.07
77%
0.23
26%
Contrast
1658
1759
6%
1069
-36%
16800
913%
5700
244%
2035
23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.3
-18%
1.12
-2%
1.8
-64%
1.35
-23%
2
-82%
4.56
-315%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.3
3
-30%
2.71
-18%
3.8
-65%
2.77
-20%
5.5
-139%
7.27
-216%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.6
0.77
-28%
1.8
-200%
1.35
-125%
1.5
-150%
4.52
-653%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.8
2
-11%
1.7
6%
0.9
50%
2.35
-31%
2.6
-44%
1.5
17%
Gamma
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
2207 0%
2.22 99%
2.21 100%
2.17 101%
2.26 97%
CCT
6764 96%
6933 94%
6870 95%
6580 99%
6824 95%
6511 100%
6219 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
88.3
87.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-3% / -4%
-2% / -8%
35% / 51%
14% / 12%
-31% / -35%
-47% / -85%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(目标色彩空间P3)
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(目标色彩空间P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。

我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计对屏幕进行了分析。Apple ,显示器传统上开箱后的校准非常好,2022年的MacBook Pro 13也不例外。灰度只显示出轻微的偏向蓝色/绿色的色彩,加上略微过冷的色温,但这用肉眼并不真正可见。另一方面,颜色偏差已经明显低于3的重要标志。

我们设法通过自己的校准进一步提高了显示器的性能,也消除了轻微的偏色(校准后的配置文件可以在上面的显示框中下载)。MBP 13几乎涵盖了完整的P3色域,因此在这个色彩空间中使用MacBook进行图片/视频编辑是没有问题的。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.1 ms rise
↘ 13.7 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.9 ms rise
↘ 22.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 117780 Hz ≤ 56 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 117780 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 56 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 117780 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21805 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

视角稳定
视角稳定

IPS屏幕的视角稳定性非常好,户外能力也不错。Apple ,使用的是光面面板,但它们的反射率就是不如许多竞争对手。高亮度也有助于在非常明亮的环境中看到显示内容。显然会有一些反射,但你应该能找到一个合适的位置,MBP 13在这方面就是比许多光面对手有优势。

性能 -Apple M2,16GB内存

2022年型号的MacBook Pro 13总是配备更快版本的新M2处理器,有8个CPU核心和10个GPU核心。入门级型号得到8GB内存,但你也可以选择16GB,现在甚至24GB的统一内存,现在也更快(LPDDR5-6400与LPDDR4x-4266在M1 MacBook).另一方面,新MacBook Air M2的入门级机型配备了较慢的8核GPU。

处理器 -Apple M2

Apple M2 SoC (Image: )Apple
Apple M2 SoC (Image: )Apple

新的Apple M2 SoC的CPU部分其实没有太大的变化,Apple 只是对现有的芯片进行了调整。我们将在以后的详细分析中介绍所有的变化,但它仍然是一个有两个集群的8核CPU,时钟比以前略高。有四个核心的效率集群最高达到2.424 GHz(以前是2.064 GHz),而四个性能核心现在最高达到3.48 GHz(以前是3.204 GHz)。制造工艺进行了调整(现在是台积电N5P,而不是台积电N5),但它仍然是一个5纳米的芯片,Apple ,无法战胜物理学,所以更高的时钟需要更多的功率。M1在多核负载时消耗约15W,新的M2在相同情况下消耗19W。Apple ,与竞争对手有相同的基本挑战。相对较小的时钟增长需要大量的额外功率。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1: Ø1066 (1062.05-1069.6)
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø878 (859.75-883.65)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Standard: Ø922 (913.26-969.84)
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Performance: Ø958 (953.54-961.86)
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø695 (607.28-765.86)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)

我们的Cinebench R15 Multi循环清楚地表明,在持续的工作负荷下,CPU的性能是完全稳定的,但我们将专注于Geekbench和Cinebench R23等原生基准测试来进行性能比较。Geekbench Multi显示最大的性能提升为18%,这也是Apple ,M2实际上只比小的10%慢M1 Pro8个CPU核心的M2实际上只慢10%。在其他基准测试中,比M1的优势要小一点(12%-15%)。

单核测试只显示了一个小的优势,但是我们在测试中也看到了3.3GHz的最大消耗,而不是宣传的3.48GHz。整体性能仍然非常好,也领先于新的Ryzen 7 6800U,比如说。英特尔目前的Alder Lake芯片提供更多的性能(见酷睿i7-1260P中的联想Yoga 9i 14),但它们也消耗更多的电力(i7需要五倍的电力来提高13%的单核性能--5瓦对26瓦)。在相当的功率水平下(见Galaxy Book 2 Pro 13),酷睿i5-1240P但在与Apple M2的竞争中并不占优势。

在电池供电的情况下,CPU的性能是完全稳定的。请参阅 我们的技术部分了解更多CPU基准测试。

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10735 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points ∼98% +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points ∼89% +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8745 Points ∼81%
Average Apple M2
 
8745 Points ∼81% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
7811 Points ∼73% -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7409 (6401.39min - 7409.31max) Points ∼69% -15%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (965 - 12181, n=78, last 2 years)
5973 Points ∼56% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
5680 Points ∼53% -35%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5186 Points ∼48% -41%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5013 (4398.92min - 5012.66max) Points ∼47% -43%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1793 Points ∼100% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1581 Points ∼88%
Average Apple M2
 
1581 Points ∼88% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points ∼85% -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
1513 Points ∼84% -4%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1496 Points ∼83% -5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points ∼83% -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1457 Points ∼81% -8%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (409 - 1663, n=76, last 2 years)
1329 Points ∼74% -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1218 Points ∼68% -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
640 Points ∼36% -60%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points ∼100% +73%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
4048 Points ∼100% +72%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
2349 Points ∼58%
Average Apple M2
 
2349 Points ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
2178 Points ∼54% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (376 - 4704, n=97, last 2 years)
2156 Points ∼53% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
2109 Points ∼52% -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1982 Points ∼49% -16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1873 Points ∼46% -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1863 Points ∼46% -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
657 Points ∼100% +72%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points ∼86% +48%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
556 Points ∼85% +46%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (157 - 633, n=98, last 2 years)
491 Points ∼75% +29%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
431 Points ∼66% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
406 Points ∼62% +7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
401 Points ∼61% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
381 Points ∼58%
Average Apple M2
 
381 Points ∼58% 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
251 Points ∼38% -34%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1805 (1600.9min - 1805.05max) Points ∼100% +47%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points ∼97% +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points ∼73% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1229 (1226.62min, 1226.74P1 - 1232.55max) Points ∼68%
Average Apple M2
 
1229 Points ∼68% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
1070 (1060min - 1070max) Points ∼59% -13%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1020 (817min - 1020max) Points ∼57% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (223 - 2041, n=103, last 2 years)
979 Points ∼54% -20%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
970 (913.26min - 969.84max) Points ∼54% -21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
961 Points ∼53% -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
884 (859.75min - 883.65max) Points ∼49% -28%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
766 (607.28min - 765.86max) Points ∼42% -38%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
243 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points ∼98% +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
223 Points ∼92%
Average Apple M2
 
223 Points ∼92% 0%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
221 Points ∼91% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points ∼86% -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
208 Points ∼86% -7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
208 Points ∼86% -7%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
208 Points ∼86% -7%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (70.1 - 239, n=96, last 2 years)
191.8 Points ∼79% -14%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
91.8 Points ∼38% -59%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
710 Seconds * ∼100% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (253 - 2650, n=96, last 2 years)
656 Seconds * ∼92% -10%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
637 Seconds * ∼90% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
595 Seconds * ∼84%
Average Apple M2
 
595 Seconds * ∼84% -0%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
559 Seconds * ∼79% +6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
509 Seconds * ∼72% +14%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds * ∼44% +48%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
300 Seconds * ∼42% +50%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
10321 Points ∼100% +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points ∼96% +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8962 Points ∼87%
Average Apple M2
 
8962 Points ∼87% 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points ∼74% -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
7590 Points ∼74% -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
7578 Points ∼73% -15%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
5771 Points ∼56% -36%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
5402 Points ∼52% -40%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1024 - 9639, n=94, last 2 years)
5230 Points ∼51% -42%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
4819 Points ∼47% -46%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1937 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2
 
1937 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Core i7-1260P
1764 Points ∼91% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1
1740 Points ∼90% -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1
1727 Points ∼89% -11%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7
1541 Points ∼80% -20%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points ∼78% -22%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H
1430 Points ∼74% -26%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (293 - 1937, n=94, last 2 years)
1322 Points ∼68% -32%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P
672 Points ∼35% -65%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

以前的 采用Apple M1处理器的MacBooks已经是非常敏捷的设备,这一点在新的M2 SoC上没有改变。在日常情况下,你无法真正注意到性能差异,类似的CrossMark测试结果也证实了这一点,但是在我们用Safari 15.5进行的浏览器基准测试中,M2的表现明显更好。

我们再次对Photoshop和Premiere Pro这两个Adobe应用程序进行了PugetBench测试。然而,该基准测试只支持这些应用程序的模拟英特尔版本,从主观上看,这些应用程序比它们的macOS优化版本明显要慢。我们已经注意到,与以前的测试相比,结果有一些变化。 M1 MacBook评论在我们的 对Mac Studio的评论因此,PugetBench的结果并不具有真正的代表性,应该谨慎考虑。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Live Playback | Export | GPU
Photoshop PugetBench: Filter Score | General Score | GPU Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: ---
Speedometer 2.0: Result
CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
1507 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
1507 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1490 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points ∼98% -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1355 Points ∼90% -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1352 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (926 - 1507, n=18, last 2 years)
1293 Points ∼86% -14%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1476 Points ∼100% +7%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1424 Points ∼96% +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
1382 Points ∼94%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
1382 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (962 - 1555, n=18, last 2 years)
1314 Points ∼89% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1305 Points ∼88% -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1274 Points ∼86% -8%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1915 Points ∼100% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
1841 Points ∼96%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
1841 Points ∼96% 0%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1593 Points ∼83% -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1554 Points ∼81% -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (957 - 1841, n=18, last 2 years)
1331 Points ∼70% -28%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1261 Points ∼66% -32%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
1425 Points ∼100% +33%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points ∼91% +21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (746 - 1501, n=18, last 2 years)
1145 Points ∼80% +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
1069 Points ∼75%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
1069 Points ∼75% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1044 Points ∼73% -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
1004 Points ∼70% -6%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
133 fps ∼100% +56%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
85 fps ∼64%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
85 fps ∼64% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (55 - 85, n=2, last 2 years)
70 fps ∼53% -18%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
24 fps ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
24 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
21 fps ∼88% -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (17 - 24, n=2, last 2 years)
20.5 fps ∼85% -15%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
837 Points ∼100% +56%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
537 Points ∼64%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
537 Points ∼64% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (156 - 537, n=3, last 2 years)
339 Points ∼41% -37%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
323 Points ∼39% -40%
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
806 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
806 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
667 Points ∼83% -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (374 - 806, n=3, last 2 years)
580 Points ∼72% -28%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
560 Points ∼69% -31%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
177.7 Points ∼100% +117%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
81.8 Points ∼46%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
81.8 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14.7 - 81.8, n=3, last 2 years)
45.1 Points ∼25% -45%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
38.8 Points ∼22% -53%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
48 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
48 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
38.9 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16.4 - 48, n=3, last 2 years)
30.1 Points ∼63% -37%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
25.8 Points ∼54% -46%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
31.6 Points ∼100% +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
26.2 Points ∼83%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
26.2 Points ∼83% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4.2 - 26.2, n=3, last 2 years)
14.9 Points ∼47% -43%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
14.3 Points ∼45% -45%
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
81.9 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
81.9 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
64.8 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (42.7 - 81.9, n=3, last 2 years)
61.9 Points ∼76% -24%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
61 Points ∼74% -26%
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
79.3 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
79.3 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
68.5 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (32.1 - 79.3, n=3, last 2 years)
54.1 Points ∼68% -32%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
51 Points ∼64% -36%
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
83.8 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
83.8 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
75.9 Points ∼91% -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
60.6 Points ∼72% -28%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (34.2 - 83.8, n=3, last 2 years)
59.5 Points ∼71% -29%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
227.4 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
227 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211 Points ∼93% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
207.9 Points ∼91% -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
191.3 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
178.7 Points ∼79% -21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
183.8 Points ∼81% -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
177.5 Points ∼78% -22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
173.3 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (50 - 227, n=40, last 2 years)
166.5 Points ∼73% -27%
WebXPRT 3 /
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
379 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
379 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
343 Points ∼91% -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
304 Points ∼80% -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
281 Points ∼74% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
281 Points ∼74% -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
270 Points ∼71% -29%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
250 Points ∼66% -34%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
233 Points ∼61% -39%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (80.1 - 379, n=91, last 2 years)
228 Points ∼60% -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
119.2 Points ∼31% -69%
Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
407 runs/min ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
406.6 runs/min ∼100%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
265 runs/min ∼65% -35%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q
213 runs/min ∼52% -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
262 runs/min ∼64% -36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
213 runs/min ∼52% -48%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
190 runs/min ∼47% -53%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (42.9 - 407, n=23, last 2 years)
184.7 runs/min ∼45% -55%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
176 runs/min ∼43% -57%

存储设备

无定形磁盘标记
无定形磁盘标记

Apple MacBook Pro 13仍然使用PCIe-3.0-SSD,最大传输速率为~3.2 GB/s。这对日常工作来说已经足够快了,但是PCIe 4.0硬盘,也就是MacBook Pro 14中使用的PCIe 4.0硬盘。例如,MacBook Pro 14例如,PCIe 4.0硬盘会更快。我们的设备配备了一个1TB的固态硬盘,在初始设置后,你可以用956GB来存放自己的应用程序和文件。基本型号再次配备了256GB的驱动器,但你可以选择高达2TB的SSD存储。这里有更多的SSD基准测试。更多的SSD基准测试列在 这里.

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
100 pt ∼100%
Average Apple SSD AP1024R
 
87.4 pt ∼87%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024R
59.9 pt ∼60%
Average of class Subnotebook
 
55 pt ∼55%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Q
52.5 pt ∼53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple SSD AP0256
50.3 pt ∼50%
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
5448 MB/s ∼100% +93%
Average Apple SSD AP1024R
  (2819 - 5334, n=2)
4077 MB/s ∼75% +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024R
2819.3 MB/s ∼52%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple SSD AP0256
2798 MB/s ∼51% -1%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2728 - 2819, n=4, last 2 years)
2775 MB/s ∼51% -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Q
2756 MB/s ∼51% -2%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
4463 MB/s ∼100% +47%
Average Apple SSD AP1024R
  (3036 - 5888, n=2)
4462 MB/s ∼100% +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024R
3036.1 MB/s ∼68%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2194 - 3036, n=4, last 2 years)
2639 MB/s ∼59% -13%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Q
2431 MB/s ∼54% -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple SSD AP0256
2194 MB/s ∼49% -28%

GPU性能

虽然CPU部分的性能提升是适度的,但我们可以看到新的M2 SoC的图形性能有更大的改善,它获得了两个额外的内核(M1:7或8个GPU核心).M2 GPU的最大功耗应该是15W,但在我们的测试中,在高达1.398 MHz的情况下,我们只看到了13.5W(M1的8核GPU在相同情况下的功耗约为10W)。这意味着对于两个额外的核心来说,功耗的增加是相当小的。

在这种功率水平下,基准测试结果非常好,我们可以看到比Apple M1 GPU有很大改进。性能上的优势是比8核M1 GPU高出约40%。 8核M1 GPU在几乎所有的基准测试中都有40%左右的性能优势,这令人印象深刻。新的M2 GPU不能与较小的 14核的M1 Pro的GPU不过,它的速度仍在25-40%之间。

GPU性能再次完全稳定,无论是在持续工作负荷下还是在电池电量下。更多的GPU基准测试可在 这里.

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9089 Points ∼100% +35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6728 Points ∼74%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
6728 Points ∼74% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
4950 Points ∼54% -26%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4487 Points ∼49% -33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1816 - 9727, n=9, last 2 years)
4236 Points ∼47% -37%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4103 Points ∼45% -39%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3827 Points ∼42% -43%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
24875 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
24875 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
17731 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
17731 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
16159 Points ∼65% -35%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
14403 Points ∼58% -42%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5964 - 24875, n=8, last 2 years)
14052 Points ∼56% -44%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points ∼100% +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6823 Points ∼74%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
6823 Points ∼74% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
4997 Points ∼54% -27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
4515 Points ∼49% -34%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3793 Points ∼41% -44%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2000 - 6823, n=8, last 2 years)
3581 Points ∼39% -48%
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points ∼100% +27%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
31996 Points ∼91% +16%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
31115 Points ∼88% +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27602 Points ∼78%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
27602 Points ∼78% 0%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
20391 Points ∼58% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
19078 Points ∼54% -31%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7
18831 Points ∼54% -32%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
18352 Points ∼52% -34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1594 - 64697, n=94, last 2 years)
17290 Points ∼49% -37%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
17029 Points ∼48% -38%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H
15303 Points ∼44% -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
15269 Points ∼43% -45%
Metal Score 5.3
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
37319 Points ∼100% +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30166 Points ∼81%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
30166 Points ∼81% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (19064 - 30166, n=4, last 2 years)
22898 Points ∼61% -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
21951 Points ∼59% -27%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
20411 Points ∼55% -32%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
19064 Points ∼51% -37%
GFXBench
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps ∼100% +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
109.8 fps ∼75%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
109.8 fps ∼75% 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
81.2 fps ∼55% -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
78.2 fps ∼53% -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
72.4 fps ∼49% -34%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10 - 109.8, n=10, last 2 years)
54.9 fps ∼37% -50%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps ∼100% +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
295 fps ∼75%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
295 fps ∼75% 0%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
214.4 fps ∼54% -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
207 fps ∼53% -30%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
192 fps ∼49% -35%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (27 - 295, n=10, last 2 years)
145.5 fps ∼37% -51%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
316 fps ∼100% +37%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
230 fps ∼73% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
229.9 fps ∼73%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
197 fps ∼62% -14%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM)
Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1
176.6 fps ∼56% -23%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1
162 fps ∼51% -30%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (24 - 230, n=6, last 2 years)
147.2 fps ∼47% -36%

游戏性能

Witcher 3 (通过CrossOver)受到图形问题的影响
Witcher 3 (通过CrossOver)受到图形问题的影响

Mac上的游戏情况正在慢慢好转,但与Windows相比,可用的作品数量仍然非常有限。除了《古墓丽影》(Shadow of the Tomb Raider)这样的仿真游戏外,还有更多的原生游戏,如《魔兽世界》,在新的MacBook Pro 13 M2上以高设置运行得非常好。例如,秋季还会有《无主之地》的Mac版。CorssOver是另一种使用Windows标题的方法,它允许我们安装Steam版本的Witcher 3 。然而,与M1机器上的测试相比,我们注意到一些图形问题,所以你不能真正玩得很好(尽管与M1 MBP 13相比,主观性能印象好得多)。显然,你也可以使用Apple's Arcade系列的游戏,这些游戏在MacBook上运行得很好。

我们在审查过程中注意到一些额外的问题,游戏Borderlands 3总是在菜单中崩溃。我们能够进行的基准测试再次显示出比M1 GPU有40-50%的大改进。 M1 GPU特别是在更高的细节方面。M1 Pro的GPU M1 Pro(有14个GPU核心)仍然相当强大。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider / Medium Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
58 fps ∼100% +49%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
39 fps ∼67%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
39 fps ∼67% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
25 fps ∼43% -36%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10.7 - 39, n=16, last 2 years)
22.1 fps ∼38% -43%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
22 (16min) fps ∼38% -44%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider / High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps ∼100% +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
36 fps ∼68%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
36 fps ∼68% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (16 - 36, n=7, last 2 years)
24.3 fps ∼46% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
23 fps ∼43% -36%
Total War: Three Kingdoms / High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
36 fps ∼100% +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
29 fps ∼81%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
29 fps ∼81% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (7.5 - 36, n=8, last 2 years)
22.4 fps ∼62% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
20.6 fps ∼57% -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
17.4 (15min) fps ∼48% -40%
Total War: Three Kingdoms / Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
27 fps ∼100% +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
21 fps ∼78%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
21 fps ∼78% 0%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (5.6 - 21, n=4, last 2 years)
14.6 fps ∼54% -30%
low med. high ultraQHD
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 39 36 31 20
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 89 47 29 21

排放物 - MBP 13通常是无声的,但风扇可能很烦人

系统噪音

当你只是执行日常任务时,MacBook Pro 13的单个风扇往往完全停用,而且1200转/分钟的最低风扇速度也听不到,所以你可以在许多情况下享受一个安静的设备。一般来说,风扇曲线非常具有防御性,Apple ,可以接受高的芯片温度。短暂的峰值负载通常在不使用风扇的情况下得到补偿,这在我们的许多基准测试中也是如此(例如,Cinebench R23 Multi的单次运行)。

下表显示了不同风扇速度下的噪音水平。与原生应用程序相比,仿真应用程序往往会导致更多的风扇活动,但只有当你真正同时对CPU和GPU施加压力时,它才会很响。在压力测试中,我们测得的噪音高达49 dB(A),这对这样一个紧凑的设备来说是很大的。

风扇转速(rpm) 风扇噪音(dB(A)) 应用
2300 24.5 -
2800 25.7 Cinebench R23 Multi 2分钟后
3200 28 Blender 3.2
3600 29.4 Cinebench R23 Multi 5分钟后
4000 32 -
4400 34.6 《古墓丽影》(模拟),Witcher 3 (通过CrossOver)。
4800 37.2 《魔兽世界
5200 40 Cinebench R15 Multi loop (emulated)
5600 42.7 Premiere Pro Puget Bench(模拟),有时也是全风扇速度
6000 44.5
6400 45.7
6800 47.4
7200 49 压力测试

我们还注意到,风扇在2800-3200转/分的范围内产生了相当令人不快的噪音,这有点令人讨厌。不过在更高的速度下,它被风扇的杂音所掩盖。总而言之,MacBook Pro 13的主动冷却解决方案并不理想。它可以非常响亮,但仍有冷却性能不足的情况,我们将在下一个评论部分看到。

我们没有注意到与外部屏幕结合使用时风扇活动的增加。我们的评测单元没有显示任何其他电子声音,如线圈的呜呜声。

Noise Level

Idle
23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Load
23.9 / 49 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.534.433.330.131.336.732.829.933.530.933.52534.835.129.432.131.536.526.731.333.231.734.83126.229.12624.323.726.521.223.531.124.126.24029.22932.326.628.629.328.525.630.925.329.25028.827.828.129.42827.326.227.130.426.528.86323.122.124.220.820.525.12020.825.521.323.18022.623.322.620.320.124.218.62224.519.922.610022.121.822.818.620.520.118.519.622.116.622.112529.319.920.117.717.819.716.21822.21729.316021.223.218.716.317.117.314.518.722.214.421.220024.721.118.215.917.316.715.717.122.213.524.725030.522.318.116.517.715.71519.221.113.230.531526.12016.714.916.414.513.619.521.112.526.140029.323.218.216.114.814.212.922.124.112.129.350032.625.219.916.616.715.21324.225.810.832.663034.326.920.517.816.816.314.925.225.910.934.380033.125.419.616.816.414.413.123.624.311.433.1100032.724.519.717.416.414.412.52324.611.432.7125031.924.418.415.914.71311.422.924.111.131.9160036.328.321.918.91613.511.325.725.810.736.3200037.730.52319.71713.411.428.428.81137.7250041.933.925.422.22114.611.830.931.911.541.9315036.42718.916.713.812.111.624.625.81236.4400037.329.216.113.312.412.412.325.126.312.337.3500040.128.115.713.512.512.512.522.824.312.640.1630038.922.413.712.812.512.612.517.919.312.538.9800031.818.113.112.812.612.712.615.216.312.631.8100002714.412.712.612.612.712.713.714.112.7271250027.413.912.512.412.412.412.513.113.712.427.4160002012.21211.911.811.811.912.813.111.920SPL494032.129.42825.724.537.238.223.949N6.331.410.90.70.62.32.60.56.3median 31.9median 23.2median 18.4median 16.3median 16.4median 14.2median 12.6median 22.1median 24.1median 12.3median 31.9Delta4.93.12.11.81.71.41.13.22.80.64.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024R
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Noise
-18%
-10%
-10%
-8%
-0%
off / environment *
23.9
29.2
-22%
24
-0%
24.6
-3%
24.5
-3%
24.8
-4%
Idle Minimum *
23.9
29.2
-22%
24
-0%
24.6
-3%
24.5
-3%
25
-5%
Idle Average *
23.9
29.2
-22%
24
-0%
24.6
-3%
24.5
-3%
25
-5%
Idle Maximum *
23.9
29.2
-22%
24
-0%
26.3
-10%
28
-17%
25
-5%
Load Average *
23.9
32.1
-34%
33.1
-38%
38.4
-61%
35.9
-50%
25.3
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.6
47
-36%
35.9
-4%
35.8
-3%
Load Maximum *
49
41.9
14%
47
4%
38.7
21%
38.6
21%
35.8
27%

* ... smaller is better

温度

压力测试
压力测试

MacBook Pro 13的铝制机箱没有任何温度问题,只有当你真正同时对CPU以及GPU施加压力时,它才会明显变热。不过,底部高达43℃的温度意味着你可以把它放在腿上,即使在最大负荷下也没有任何问题(更不用说普通工作负荷)。键盘也会变热,但也没有什么限制。

我们可以看到M2 SoC在CPU/GPU综合负载期间的最大封装功率为35W。然而,这个数值只能维持几秒钟,然后就会下降到25W左右,同时风扇速度也在慢慢增加。一旦风扇达到最大速度,封装功率将稳定在28-30W,但芯片温度仍然很高,达到98℃。这意味着尽管有风扇,但冷却方案不能利用M2芯片的全部潜力。

Max. Load
 41.9 °C44.9 °C41.6 °C 
 42.2 °C45.1 °C40.1 °C 
 33.5 °C30.5 °C33.6 °C 
Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 39.3 °C
43 °C42.4 °C39.8 °C
40 °C42.2 °C39.4 °C
33.8 °C34.9 °C34.4 °C
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40.3 °C | Room Temperature 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.7 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.4 to 58.4 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.5 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
7%
-3%
-12%
-14%
-2%
-8%
Maximum Upper Side *
45.1
41
9%
44
2%
47.9
-6%
47.9
-6%
42.8
5%
46.6
-3%
Maximum Bottom *
43
40.4
6%
44
-2%
56.1
-30%
51.3
-19%
46.9
-9%
46
-7%
Idle Upper Side *
25.2
23.6
6%
27
-7%
26.8
-6%
28.5
-13%
25.2
-0%
26.6
-6%
Idle Bottom *
25.4
23.6
7%
27
-6%
27.3
-7%
29.6
-17%
26
-2%
29.2
-15%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

MacBook Pro 13仍然配备了立体声扬声器,与许多其他超极本和副本相比,其声音非常好,而且更好。与拥有更多扬声器的Apple 系统相比(如MacBook Pro 14),声音缺乏一点力量和空间感。我们已经迫不及待地想测试配备新的四扬声器音响系统的新MacBook Air。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2030.935.22531.734.13124.132.94025.334.45026.534.26321.337.38019.941.410016.651.81251757.216014.45220013.556.625013.260.131512.563.840012.165.950010.86763010.966.880011.467.3100011.470.5125011.172.7160010.771.720001173.1250011.57031501268.1400012.370.8500012.668.9630012.568.5800012.665.11000012.762.61250012.462.91600011.962.8SPL23.981.8N0.553.8median 12.3median 66.8Delta0.63.930.235.431.734.925.834.932.236.927.535.924.544.323.154.723.365.121.966.320.164.521.566.818.869.817.671.914.972.613.770.91473.611.273.711.171.610.772.312.272.411.273.511.674.511.775.7127312.273.812.469.712.568.212.667.112.563.911.968.524.884.90.668.3median 12.5median 71.62.33hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 50%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

能源管理--使用新的M2,电池运行时间将近20小时

消耗功率

MacBook Pro 13非常高效,尤其是在工作负荷较轻的场景下,但之前采用M1 SoC的MBP 13已经是这种情况。我们的负载测量再次表明M2芯片的功耗增加。压力测试结果也证实,M2的全部潜力无法长期利用。我们测得的功率高达56W,后来稳定在48W左右。因此,67W的电源适配器是完全足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.77 / 6.7 / 6.9 Watt
Load midlight 30.9 / 56 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024R, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB)
M1, M1 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry
M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H
i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Phison Electronics PS5012, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
 
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Power Consumption
5%
12%
-49%
-28%
-41%
-52%
0%
-43%
Idle Minimum *
1.77
1.67
6%
1.9
-7%
4.8
-171%
4.3
-143%
4.2
-137%
5.7
-222%
1.77
-0%
4.23 ?(1.67 - 9.9, n=94, last 2 years)
-139%
Idle Average *
6.7
6.7
-0%
6.4
4%
8.7
-30%
6
10%
8.1
-21%
6
10%
6.7
-0%
7.43 ?(4.6 - 14.1, n=94, last 2 years)
-11%
Idle Maximum *
6.9
7.4
-7%
7
-1%
10.1
-46%
8.8
-28%
9
-30%
12.3
-78%
6.9
-0%
9.19 ?(5.1 - 15.9, n=94, last 2 years)
-33%
Load Average *
30.9
28
9%
25
19%
45.6
-48%
36
-17%
41.7
-35%
44.4
-44%
30.9
-0%
39.7 ?(8.3 - 85.7, n=95, last 2 years)
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.9
42.4
-9%
32.9
15%
40.1
-3%
36.5
6%
Load Maximum *
56
47.5
15%
30.3
46%
49.5
12%
60
-7%
68
-21%
47.8
15%
56
-0%
57.7 ?(19.6 - 110.9, n=94, last 2 years)
-3%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.9 (37.2-39.6)
; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø45.3 (38.7-56)

Power Consumption external screen