Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2笔记本电脑评测--新 M2的首次亮相Apple

Name: Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Brand: Apple

在一个熟悉的形状下有更多的性能。 我们仍需等待MacBook Air的全新重新设计，但Apple ，已经推出了配备新的Apple M2处理器的MacBook Pro 13的更新版本。其他方面的变化非常有限，因为显示屏以及包括Touch Bar在内的底盘都与之前的型号没有变化。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/22/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple ARM MacBook Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Ultrabook

有很多关于全面重新设计新MacBook Air的传言和猜测。 Apple's M2处理器的MacBook Air的全面重新设计。但第一台采用新M2 SoC的MacBook实际上是一个熟悉的伙伴，即MacBook Pro 13。它看起来就像之前的型号配备了M1芯片，没有凹槽的13.3英寸显示屏是相同的，你可以得到与Touch Bar相结合的魔法键盘。2022年的MacBook Pro 13也没有获得MagSafe连接器。

Apple 只为MacBook Pro 13提供更快的M2版本，它有8个CPU核心和10个GPU核心，而新的MacBook Air M2的入门级型号则以较慢的8核心GPU发货。MBP 13采用主动冷却解决方案，因此与被动冷却的MacBook Air M2相比，性能应该更加稳定。

配备M2处理器的2022年MacBook Pro 13的价格从1299美元开始，配备256GB固态硬盘存储和8GB内存；我们的评测单元配备16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘，售价1899美元。所有型号都采用相同的M2 SoC（8个CPU内核，10个GPU内核）。

Test device courtesy of Apple Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2

Processor

Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 20 W PL1 / Sustained

Graphics adapter

Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Core: 1398 MHz, 13.5 W TDP

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5-6400, onboard

Display

13.30 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 227 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz

Storage

Apple SSD AP1024Z, 1024 GB

, 956 GB free

Connections

2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 15.6 x 304.1 x 212.4

Battery

58.2 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Apple macOS 12 Monterey

Camera

Webcam: FaceTime HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 67W PSU, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.372 kg, Power Supply: 274 g

Price

2289 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
91.9 %	06/2022	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	1.4 kg	15.6 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
91.1 %	12/2020	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU	1.4 kg	15.6 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
91.1 %	12/2020	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU	1.3 kg	16.1 mm	13.30"	2560x1600
90.1 %	07/2022	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M	1.1 kg	14.9 mm	13.30"	2880x1800
86.7 %	05/2022	Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	885 g	11 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
88.8 %	02/2022	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.3 kg	16.5 mm	13.40"	2520x1680
88.3 %	06/2021	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	14.8 mm	13.40"	3456x2160

外壳 - 铝制MacBook没有变化

我们对MacBook Pro 13的铝制底盘非常了解，从以前的版本中可以看出。以前的迭代但它的高品质和出色的制造质量仍然是伟大的。唯一略显过时的方面是一旦你打开盖子，边框的大小，尽管有16:10的长宽比屏幕，但对于现代的副笔记本来说，边框还是有点宽。

在质量或稳定性方面没有什么可批评的。铝合金表面的最大优势是它们不容易变脏或变油，而且MacBook通常在多年后只要稍加保养就会看起来非常好。

尺寸比较

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - MBP 13再次采用雷电3技术

2022年的MacBook Pro 13 M2没有获得MagSafe连接器，这意味着你再次被限制在左侧的两个USB-C端口。它们支持Thunderbolt 3和USB 4的完整40 GB/s（USB 3.1 Gen.2的10 GB/s），以及充电和DisplayPort。除了集成显示器外，MBP 13 M2只能以6K/60 Hz的速度驱动一个额外的外部屏幕。

左侧：2个Thunderbolt 3（USB-C 4，40 GB/s，Power Delivery，DisplayPort ALT模式）。

沟通

新款Apple M2的Wi-Fi性能与M1相比没有真正的变化，很难令人信服。现代的Wi-Fi 6E标准不被支持，Wi-Fi 6连接只适用于80MHz频段，这意味着MacBook无法跟上160MHz Wi-Fi 6模块的传输速率。我们看到比以前的略有改善 MacBook Pro 13 M1结合华硕的新参考路由器，但传输速率仍然相当慢，约为800 Mbps。性能至少是稳定的，我们在审查期间没有注意到信号质量的任何问题，所以限制不是很大，除非你在个人网络中传输大型文件。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	909 (814^min - 1010^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (405 - 1750, n=103)	787 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	649 (611^min - 664^max) MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	617 (220^min - 685^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple AirPort Extreme M1	552 (257^min - 620^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1368 (681^min - 1483^max) MBit/s
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1258 (1143^min - 1362^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (284 - 1414, n=103)	765 MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	757 (378^min - 806^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple AirPort Extreme M1	672 (614^min - 682^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1553 (1443^min - 1620^max) MBit/s +88%
Average of class Subnotebook (353 - 1775, n=47, last 2 years)	1407 MBit/s +70%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	828 (753^min - 878^max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (234 - 1696, n=97)	820 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1492 (1365^min - 1583^max) MBit/s +87%
Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 1824, n=47, last 2 years)	1263 MBit/s +58%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (305 - 1757, n=97)	879 MBit/s +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	797 (751^min - 821^max) MBit/s

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (753-878)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø796 (751-821)

网络摄像头

虽然新的MacBook Air M2将获得一个1080p网络摄像头，但MBP 13仍然配备了我们从以前的迭代中了解到的720p FaceTime高清摄像头。它完成了自己的工作，但图片质量不是很有说服力。

ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2: 9.24 ∆E min: 4.92 - max: 14.38 ∆E

维护

用相应的Pentalobe螺丝刀拆卸底盖很容易，但你的维护工作仅限于清洁风扇。

输入设备 - 触摸条的寿命比预期长

输入设备也没有改变，这意味着2022年的MBP 13仍然配备了键盘上方的触摸条。这是最后一款配备小的触摸感应显示屏的机型，因此Apple ，接受它不过是一个噱头。所有其他MacBook型号再次配备了普通功能键。

在Apple ，在蝴蝶键实验后改回剪刀机构后，大多数用户应该对键盘感到满意，整体打字体验良好。背景照明的自动调节是一个非常方便的功能，提高了整体的用户体验。

大尺寸触控板仍然是移动领域的标杆，这也是出色的软件支持和与macOS整合的结果。

显示屏 - 没有凹槽的MacBook Pro 13

显示屏再次是熟悉的16:10 IPS屏幕，没有凹槽。这么多年过去了，主观的画质仍然很好。2560 x 1600像素的高分辨率确保了清晰的图像，色彩也不会令人失望。你还受益于自动亮度调节，效果非常好，还可以根据环境光线（True Tone）自动调节色温。macOS也没有任何缩放问题，这在采用高分辨率面板的Windows笔记本电脑上仍然是一个问题。

亮度的额定值为500尼特，我们的测试装置达到了514尼特（平均497尼特），结合0.31的体面黑值，这导致了超过1600:1的非常高的对比度。当面板亮度下降到56%及以下时，我们可以确定有闪烁现象，但这不是典型的PWM闪烁现象。117kHz的频率是非常高的，应该不会造成任何问题。响应时间对于IPS屏幕来说是不错的，我们没有注意到任何重影。

新款MacBook Air M2的显示屏 MacBook Air M2也将支持更宽的P3基准，其他规格也是相同的，只是外形尺寸略有不同（由于增加了垂直空间）。与较大的配备Mini-LED面板的MacBook Pro机型相比，较小的MBP 13并不支持更宽的P3基准。较小的MBP 13不支持高达120赫兹的更高刷新率或HDR功能。


487 cd/m²	497 cd/m²	476 cd/m²
512 cd/m²	514 cd/m²	502 cd/m²
503 cd/m²	500 cd/m²	484 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 514 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 497.2 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 513 cd/m²
Contrast: 1658:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED SDC4172, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30	Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE ATNA33XC10-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H TL134GDXP02-0, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Display			-1%	4%	3%	-22%	4%
Display P3 Coverage	98.8		98.6 0%	99.8 1%	99.81 1%	65.2 -34%	99.7 1%
sRGB Coverage	100		100 0%	100 0%	100 0%	92 -8%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	87.9		85.9 -2%	97.8 11%	95.55 9%	67.5 -23%	97.7 11%
Response Times		-0%	11%	30%	28%	-27%	29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42 ?(19.9, 22.1)	48 ?(18.8, 29.2) -14%	31 ?(14, 17) 26%	2.1 ?(1.1, 1) 95%	4 ?(2, 2) 90%	44.8 ?(22, 22.8) -7%	2.2 ?(1.2, 1) 95%
Response Time Black / White *	27.8 ?(14.1, 13.7)	25.2 ?(8.4, 16.8) 9%	26.1 ?(14.9, 11.2) 6%	1.68 ?(0.86, 0.82) 94%	2 ?(1, 1) 93%	22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4) 18%	2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 92%
PWM Frequency	117780 ?(56)	122000 ?(49) 4%	118000 ?(49, 155) 0%	240.4 ?(53) -100%	61 ?(90) -100%	9804 ?(20, 47) -92%	240.4 ?(51) -100%
Screen		-6%	-16%	74%	10%	-43%	-173%
Brightness middle	514	510 -1%	417 -19%	336 -35%	399 -22%	468 -9%	384 -25%
Brightness	497	491 -1%	395 -21%	338 -32%	403 -19%	450 -9%	387 -22%
Brightness Distribution	93	94 1%	91 -2%	99 6%	98 5%	92 -1%	97 4%
Black Level *	0.31	0.29 6%	0.39 -26%	0.02 94%	0.07 77%	0.23 26%
Contrast	1658	1759 6%	1069 -36%	16800 913%	5700 244%	2035 23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.1	1.3 -18%	1.12 -2%	1.8 -64%	1.35 -23%	2 -82%	4.56 -315%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.3	3 -30%	2.71 -18%	3.8 -65%	2.77 -20%	5.5 -139%	7.27 -216%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.6		0.77 -28%	1.8 -200%	1.35 -125%	1.5 -150%	4.52 -653%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	2 -11%	1.7 6%	0.9 50%	2.35 -31%	2.6 -44%	1.5 17%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.23 ^99%	2207 ^0%	2.22 ^99%	2.21 ^100%	2.17 ^101%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6764 ^96%	6933 ^94%	6870 ^95%	6580 ^99%	6824 ^95%	6511 ^100%	6219 ^105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		88.3					87.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		100					100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / -4%	-2% / -8%	36% / 51%	14% / 12%	-31% / -35%	-47% / -85%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计对屏幕进行了分析。Apple ，显示器传统上开箱后的校准非常好，2022年的MacBook Pro 13也不例外。灰度只显示出轻微的偏向蓝色/绿色的色彩，加上略微过冷的色温，但这用肉眼并不真正可见。另一方面，颜色偏差已经明显低于3的重要标志。

我们设法通过自己的校准进一步提高了显示器的性能，也消除了轻微的偏色（校准后的配置文件可以在上面的显示框中下载）。MBP 13几乎涵盖了完整的P3色域，因此在这个色彩空间中使用MacBook进行图片/视频编辑是没有问题的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.1 ms rise
27.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13.7 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.9 ms rise
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 22.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

117780 Hz

≤ 56 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 117780 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 56 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 117780 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

IPS屏幕的视角稳定性非常好，户外能力也不错。Apple ，使用的是光面面板，但它们的反射率就是不如许多竞争对手。高亮度也有助于在非常明亮的环境中看到显示内容。显然会有一些反射，但你应该能找到一个合适的位置，MBP 13在这方面就是比许多光面对手有优势。

性能 -Apple M2，16GB内存

2022年型号的MacBook Pro 13总是配备更快版本的新M2处理器，有8个CPU核心和10个GPU核心。入门级型号得到8GB内存，但你也可以选择16GB，现在甚至24GB的统一内存，现在也更快（LPDDR5-6400与LPDDR4x-4266在M1 MacBook).另一方面，新MacBook Air M2的入门级机型配备了较慢的8核GPU。

处理器 -Apple M2

新的Apple M2 SoC的CPU部分其实没有太大的变化，Apple 只是对现有的芯片进行了调整。我们将在以后的详细分析中介绍所有的变化，但它仍然是一个有两个集群的8核CPU，时钟比以前略高。有四个核心的效率集群最高达到2.424 GHz（以前是2.064 GHz），而四个性能核心现在最高达到3.48 GHz（以前是3.204 GHz）。制造工艺进行了调整（现在是台积电N5P，而不是台积电N5），但它仍然是一个5纳米的芯片，Apple ，无法战胜物理学，所以更高的时钟需要更多的功率。M1在多核负载时消耗约15W，新的M2在相同情况下消耗19W。Apple ，与竞争对手有相同的基本挑战。相对较小的时钟增长需要大量的额外功率。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1: Ø1066 (1062.05-1069.6)

Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1; Rosetta 2: Ø843 (817.01-1020.12)

Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)

Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø878 (859.75-883.65)

Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Standard: Ø922 (913.26-969.84)

Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H; Performance: Ø958 (953.54-961.86)

Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø695 (607.28-765.86)

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)

我们的Cinebench R15 Multi循环清楚地表明，在持续的工作负荷下，CPU的性能是完全稳定的，但我们将专注于Geekbench和Cinebench R23等原生基准测试来进行性能比较。Geekbench Multi显示最大的性能提升为18%，这也是Apple ，M2实际上只比小的10%慢M1 Pro8个CPU核心的M2实际上只慢10%。在其他基准测试中，比M1的优势要小一点（12%-15%）。

单核测试只显示了一个小的优势，但是我们在测试中也看到了3.3GHz的最大消耗，而不是宣传的3.48GHz。整体性能仍然非常好，也领先于新的Ryzen 7 6800U，比如说。英特尔目前的Alder Lake芯片提供更多的性能（见酷睿i7-1260P中的联想Yoga 9i 14)，但它们也消耗更多的电力(i7需要五倍的电力来提高13%的单核性能--5瓦对26瓦)。在相当的功率水平下（见Galaxy Book 2 Pro 13），酷睿i5-1240P但在与Apple M2的竞争中并不占优势。

在电池供电的情况下，CPU的性能是完全稳定的。请参阅我们的技术部分了解更多CPU基准测试。

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	10735 Points +23%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	10468 Points +20%
Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)	10289 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9581 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	8745 Points
Average Apple M2 (8517 - 8772, n=5)	8654 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	7811 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	7409 (6401.39^min - 7409.31^max) Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	5680 Points -35%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	5186 Points -41%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	5013 (4398.92^min - 5012.66^max) Points -43%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	1793 Points +13%
Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)	1627 Points +3%
Average Apple M2 (1580 - 1638, n=5)	1595 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	1581 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1531 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	1513 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	1496 Points -5%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1488 Points -6%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	1457 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	1218 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	640 Points -60%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	4060 Points +73%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	4048 Points +72%
Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)	3963 Points +69%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	2349 Points
Average Apple M2 (2231 - 2416, n=5)	2325 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	2178 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	2109 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	1982 Points -16%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	1873 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	1863 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	657 Points +72%
Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)	610 Points +60%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	564 Points +48%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	556 Points +46%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	431 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	406 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	401 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	381 Points
Average Apple M2 (216 - 446, n=5)	371 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	251 Points -34%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	1805 (1600.9^min - 1805.05^max) Points +47%
Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)	1757 Points +43%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1742 Points +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1320 (1307^min - 1320^max) Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	1229 (1226.62^min, 1226.74^P1 - 1232.55^max) Points
Average Apple M2 (1210 - 1243, n=5)	1222 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	1070 (1060^min - 1070^max) Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	1020 (817^min - 1020^max) Points -17%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	970 (913.26^min - 969.84^max) Points -21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	961 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	884 (859.75^min - 883.65^max) Points -28%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	766 (607.28^min - 765.86^max) Points -38%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	243 Points +9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	237 Points +6%
Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)	237 Points +6%
Average Apple M2 (222 - 229, n=5)	224 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	223 Points
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	221 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	210 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	208 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	208 Points -7%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	208 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	91.8 Points -59%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	710 Seconds * -19%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	637 Seconds * -7%
Average Apple M2 (549 - 713, n=5)	614 Seconds * -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	595 Seconds *
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	559 Seconds * +6%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	509 Seconds * +14%
Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)	386 Seconds * +35%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	310 Seconds * +48%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	300 Seconds * +50%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	10321 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9942 Points +11%
Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)	9084 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	8962 Points
Average Apple M2 (8491 - 8994, n=7)	8839 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	7613 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	7590 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	7578 Points -15%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	5771 Points -36%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	5402 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	4819 Points -46%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2	1937 Points
Average Apple M2 (1890 - 1953, n=7)	1918 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1769 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Core i7-1260P	1764 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1	1740 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1	1727 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)	1701 Points -12%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7	1541 Points -20%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	1514 Points -22%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H	1430 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P	672 Points -65%

* ... smaller is better

系统性能

以前的采用Apple M1处理器的MacBooks已经是非常敏捷的设备，这一点在新的M2 SoC上没有改变。在日常情况下，你无法真正注意到性能差异，类似的CrossMark测试结果也证实了这一点，但是在我们用Safari 15.5进行的浏览器基准测试中，M2的表现明显更好。

我们再次对Photoshop和Premiere Pro这两个Adobe应用程序进行了PugetBench测试。然而，该基准测试只支持这些应用程序的模拟英特尔版本，从主观上看，这些应用程序比它们的macOS优化版本明显要慢。我们已经注意到，与以前的测试相比，结果有一些变化。 M1 MacBook评论在我们的对Mac Studio的评论因此，PugetBench的结果并不具有真正的代表性，应该谨慎考虑。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score 0.9
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Live Playback 0.9 | Export 0.9 | GPU 0.9
Photoshop PugetBench: Filter Score | General Score | GPU Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Speedometer 2.0: Result

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)	1553 Points +3%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1496 - 1585, n=6)	1538 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1507 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1490 Points -1%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1481 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1355 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1352 Points -10%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)	1507 Points +9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1476 Points +7%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1424 Points +3%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1377 - 1441, n=6)	1409 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1382 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1305 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1274 Points -8%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1915 Points +4%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1777 - 1967, n=6)	1859 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1841 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)	1690 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1593 Points -13%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1554 Points -16%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1261 Points -32%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	1425 Points +33%
Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)	1329 Points +24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1293 Points +21%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (1065 - 1182, n=6)	1137 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	1069 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1044 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	1004 Points -6%

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	133 fps +56%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	85 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (59 - 85, n=6, last 2 years)	72 fps -15%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (59 - 85, n=4)	70.8 fps -17%

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Average of class Subnotebook (24 - 32, n=6, last 2 years)	26.8 fps +12%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (24 - 26, n=4)	24.8 fps +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	24 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	21 fps -12%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	837 Points +56%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	537 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (500 - 537, n=2)	519 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (335 - 537, n=3, last 2 years)	457 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	323 Points -40%

Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	806 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (747 - 828, n=3)	794 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (648 - 828, n=4, last 2 years)	757 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	667 Points -17%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	560 Points -31%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	177.7 Points +117%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	81.8 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (79.5 - 81.8, n=2)	80.7 Points -1%
Average of class Subnotebook (39 - 81.8, n=3, last 2 years)	66.8 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	38.8 Points -53%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	48 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (45.4 - 48, n=2)	46.7 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (41.5 - 48, n=3, last 2 years)	45 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	38.9 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	25.8 Points -46%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	31.6 Points +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	26.2 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (24.2 - 26.2, n=2)	25.2 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.2 - 26.2, n=3, last 2 years)	24.2 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	14.3 Points -45%

Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	81.9 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (62.8 - 86.9, n=3)	77.2 Points -6%
Average of class Subnotebook (62.8 - 86.9, n=4, last 2 years)	74.9 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	64.8 Points -21%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	61 Points -26%

Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (78.7 - 86.6, n=3)	81.5 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	79.3 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (61.6 - 86.6, n=4, last 2 years)	76.6 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	68.5 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	51 Points -36%

Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	83.8 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (75.6 - 83.8, n=3)	80.4 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (70.2 - 83.8, n=4, last 2 years)	77.9 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	75.9 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	60.6 Points -28%

Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook (166.4 - 478, n=38, last 2 years)	263 Points +16%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (220 - 239, n=6)	230 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	227.4 Points
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	207.9 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	191.3 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	178.7 Points -21%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	183.8 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	177.5 Points -22%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	173.3 Points -24%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	379 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (342 - 387, n=6)	368 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	343 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	304 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	281 Points -26%
Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years)	284 Points -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	281 Points -26%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	270 Points -29%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	250 Points -34%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	233 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	119.2 Points -69%

Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	406.6 runs/min
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU (363 - 428, n=6)	398 runs/min -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (176 - 674, n=27, last 2 years)	324 runs/min -20%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	265 runs/min -35%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1 7-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256Q	213 runs/min -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	262 runs/min -36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	213 runs/min -48%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	190 runs/min -53%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	176 runs/min -57%

存储设备

Apple MacBook Pro 13仍然使用PCIe-3.0-SSD，最大传输速率为~3.2 GB/s。这对日常工作来说已经足够快了，但是PCIe 4.0硬盘，也就是MacBook Pro 14中使用的PCIe 4.0硬盘。例如，MacBook Pro 14例如，PCIe 4.0硬盘会更快。我们的设备配备了一个1TB的固态硬盘，在初始设置后，你可以用956GB来存放自己的应用程序和文件。基本型号再次配备了256GB的驱动器，但你可以选择高达2TB的SSD存储。这里有更多的SSD基准测试。更多的SSD基准测试列在这里.

Drive Performance Rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	100 pt
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z	70.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple SSD AP1024Z	59.9 pt
Average of class Subnotebook	56 pt
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Q	52.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple SSD AP0256	50.3 pt

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	5448 MB/s +93%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z (2797 - 4860, n=5)	3240 MB/s +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple SSD AP1024Z	2819.3 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple SSD AP0256	2798 MB/s -1%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Q	2756 MB/s -2%
Average of class Subnotebook (1476 - 2948, n=6, last 2 years)	2632 MB/s -7%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	4463 MB/s +47%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z (2873 - 6126, n=5)	3609 MB/s +19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple SSD AP1024Z	3036.1 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook (1653 - 3243, n=6, last 2 years)	2840 MB/s -6%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple SSD AP0256Q	2431 MB/s -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple SSD AP0256	2194 MB/s -28%

GPU性能

虽然CPU部分的性能提升是适度的，但我们可以看到新的M2 SoC的图形性能有更大的改善，它获得了两个额外的内核(M1：7或8个GPU核心).M2 GPU的最大功耗应该是15W，但在我们的测试中，在高达1.398 MHz的情况下，我们只看到了13.5W（M1的8核GPU在相同情况下的功耗约为10W）。这意味着对于两个额外的核心来说，功耗的增加是相当小的。

在这种功率水平下，基准测试结果非常好，我们可以看到比Apple M1 GPU有很大改进。性能上的优势是比8核M1 GPU高出约40%。 8核M1 GPU在几乎所有的基准测试中都有40%左右的性能优势，这令人印象深刻。新的M2 GPU不能与较小的 14核的M1 Pro的GPU不过，它的速度仍在25-40%之间。

GPU性能再次完全稳定，无论是在持续工作负荷下还是在电池电量下。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里.

3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9089 Points +35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6728 Points
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (5137 - 6982, n=6)	6557 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	4950 Points -26%
Average of class Subnotebook (2001 - 9404, n=13, last 2 years)	4789 Points -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	4487 Points -33%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	4103 Points -39%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3827 Points -43%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	24875 Points
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (21302 - 25317, n=4)	24095 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (14403 - 24885, n=4, last 2 years)	21293 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	17731 Points -29%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	17731 Points -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	16159 Points -35%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	14403 Points -42%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9267 Points +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6823 Points
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (5328 - 6987, n=6)	6623 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook (2438 - 9340, n=24, last 2 years)	5503 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	4997 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	4515 Points -34%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	3793 Points -44%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	35173 Points +27%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	31996 Points +16%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (27489 - 27965, n=4)	27688 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	27602 Points
Average of class Subnotebook (10477 - 61067, n=66, last 2 years)	23958 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga 9i 14 2022 i7-1260P Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P	20391 Points -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	19078 Points -31%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1185G7	18831 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	18352 Points -34%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	17029 Points -38%
Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-11300H	15303 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	15269 Points -45%
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	37319 Points +24%
Average of class Subnotebook (26079 - 34823, n=6, last 2 years)	31015 Points +3%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (30149 - 33465, n=5)	30921 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	30166 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	21951 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	20411 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	19064 Points -37%

GFXBench
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	147 fps +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	109.8 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (77 - 110, n=6)	100.4 fps -9%
Average of class Subnotebook (31 - 120, n=10, last 2 years)	89.5 fps -18%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	81.2 fps -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	78.2 fps -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	72.4 fps -34%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	47.8 fps -56%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	394 fps +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	295 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (241 - 296, n=6)	282 fps -4%
Average of class Subnotebook (85 - 331, n=10, last 2 years)	243 fps -18%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	214.4 fps -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	207 fps -30%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	192 fps -35%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	120 fps -59%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	316 fps +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	229.9 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (136 - 232, n=6)	202 fps -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	197 fps -14%
Average of class Subnotebook (79 - 260, n=9, last 2 years)	185.1 fps -19%
Apple MacBook Air Late 2020 (M1, 8 Core GPU, 8 GB RAM) Apple M1 8-Core GPU, Apple M1	176.6 fps -23%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1 7-Core GPU, Apple M1	162 fps -30%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U	109.3 fps -52%

游戏性能

Mac上的游戏情况正在慢慢好转，但与Windows相比，可用的作品数量仍然非常有限。除了《古墓丽影》（Shadow of the Tomb Raider）这样的仿真游戏外，还有更多的原生游戏，如《魔兽世界》，在新的MacBook Pro 13 M2上以高设置运行得非常好。例如，秋季还会有《无主之地》的Mac版。CorssOver是另一种使用Windows标题的方法，它允许我们安装Steam版本的Witcher 3 。然而，与M1机器上的测试相比，我们注意到一些图形问题，所以你不能真正玩得很好（尽管与M1 MBP 13相比，主观性能印象好得多）。显然，你也可以使用Apple's Arcade系列的游戏，这些游戏在MacBook上运行得很好。

我们在审查过程中注意到一些额外的问题，游戏Borderlands 3总是在菜单中崩溃。我们能够进行的基准测试再次显示出比M1 GPU有40-50%的大改进。 M1 GPU特别是在更高的细节方面。M1 Pro的GPU M1 Pro(有14个GPU核心）仍然相当强大。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider: 1920x1080 Medium Preset | 1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM | Total War: Three Kingdoms: 1920x1080 High (incl textures) | 1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider / Medium Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	58 fps +49%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	39 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (26 - 62, n=10, last 2 years)	35.7 fps -8%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (28 - 40, n=4)	34.5 fps -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	25 fps -36%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU	22 (16^min) fps -44%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider / High Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	53 fps +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	36 fps
Average of class Subnotebook (24 - 50, n=10, last 2 years)	31.4 fps -13%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (25 - 36, n=4)	31 fps -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	23 fps -36%

Total War: Three Kingdoms / High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	36 fps +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	29 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (22 - 29.5, n=4)	26.7 fps -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (18 - 29, n=4, last 2 years)	23.8 fps -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	20.6 fps -29%
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU	17.4 (15^min) fps -40%

Total War: Three Kingdoms / Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	27 fps +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	21 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU (15.9 - 21.3, n=4)	18.6 fps -11%
Average of class Subnotebook (14 - 21, n=4, last 2 years)	16.7 fps -20%

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)		39	36	31	20
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	89	47	29	21

排放物 - MBP 13通常是无声的，但风扇可能很烦人

系统噪音

当你只是执行日常任务时，MacBook Pro 13的单个风扇往往完全停用，而且1200转/分钟的最低风扇速度也听不到，所以你可以在许多情况下享受一个安静的设备。一般来说，风扇曲线非常具有防御性，Apple ，可以接受高的芯片温度。短暂的峰值负载通常在不使用风扇的情况下得到补偿，这在我们的许多基准测试中也是如此（例如，Cinebench R23 Multi的单次运行）。

下表显示了不同风扇速度下的噪音水平。与原生应用程序相比，仿真应用程序往往会导致更多的风扇活动，但只有当你真正同时对CPU和GPU施加压力时，它才会很响。在压力测试中，我们测得的噪音高达49 dB(A)，这对这样一个紧凑的设备来说是很大的。

风扇转速（rpm）	风扇噪音（dB(A)）	应用
2300	24.5	-
2800	25.7	Cinebench R23 Multi 2分钟后
3200	28	Blender 3.2
3600	29.4	Cinebench R23 Multi 5分钟后
4000	32	-
4400	34.6	《古墓丽影》（模拟），Witcher 3 （通过CrossOver）。
4800	37.2	《魔兽世界
5200	40	Cinebench R15 Multi loop (emulated)
5600	42.7	Premiere Pro Puget Bench（模拟），有时也是全风扇速度
6000	44.5
6400	45.7
6800	47.4
7200	49	压力测试

我们还注意到，风扇在2800-3200转/分的范围内产生了相当令人不快的噪音，这有点令人讨厌。不过在更高的速度下，它被风扇的杂音所掩盖。总而言之，MacBook Pro 13的主动冷却解决方案并不理想。它可以非常响亮，但仍有冷却性能不足的情况，我们将在下一个评论部分看到。

我们没有注意到与外部屏幕结合使用时风扇活动的增加。我们的评测单元没有显示任何其他电子声音，如线圈的呜呜声。

Noise Level

Idle		23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Load		23.9 / 49 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)

	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1 8-Core GPU, M1, Apple SSD AP0256	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-11300H, Phison Electronics PS5012	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G
Noise		-18%	-6%	-10%	-8%	-0%
off / environment *	23.9	29.2 -22%	24 -0%	24.6 -3%	24.5 -3%	24.8 -4%
Idle Minimum *	23.9	29.2 -22%	24 -0%	24.6 -3%	24.5 -3%	25 -5%
Idle Average *	23.9	29.2 -22%	24 -0%	24.6 -3%	24.5 -3%	25 -5%
Idle Maximum *	23.9	29.2 -22%	24 -0%	26.3 -10%	28 -17%	25 -5%
Load Average *	23.9	32.1 -34%	33.1 -38%	38.4 -61%	35.9 -50%	25.3 -6%
Witcher 3 ultra *	34.6		40.2 -16%		35.9 -4%	35.8 -3%
Load Maximum *	49	41.9 14%	41.7 15%	38.7 21%	38.6 21%	35.8 27%

* ... smaller is better

温度

MacBook Pro 13的铝制机箱没有任何温度问题，只有当你真正同时对CPU以及GPU施加压力时，它才会明显变热。不过，底部高达43℃的温度意味着你可以把它放在腿上，即使在最大负荷下也没有任何问题（更不用说普通工作负荷）。键盘也会变热，但也没有什么限制。

我们可以看到M2 SoC在CPU/GPU综合负载期间的最大封装功率为35W。然而，这个数值只能维持几秒钟，然后就会下降到25W左右，同时风扇速度也在慢慢增加。一旦风扇达到最大速度，封装功率将稳定在28-30W，但芯片温度仍然很高，达到98℃。这意味着尽管有风扇，但冷却方案不能利用M2芯片的全部潜力。

Max. Load

Idle


41.9 °C	44.9 °C	41.6 °C
42.2 °C	45.1 °C	40.1 °C
33.5 °C	30.5 °C	33.6 °C

Maximum: 45.1 °C
Average: 39.3 °C


43 °C	42.4 °C	39.8 °C
40 °C	42.2 °C	39.4 °C
33.8 °C	34.9 °C	34.4 °C

Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 38.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.3 °C | Room Temperature 22.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.6 °C / 92.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).

	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry Apple M1, Apple M1 7-Core GPU	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M	Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H Intel Core i5-11300H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		7%	-3%	-12%	-14%	-2%	-8%
Maximum Upper Side *	45.1	41 9%	44 2%	47.9 -6%	47.9 -6%	42.8 5%	46.6 -3%
Maximum Bottom *	43	40.4 6%	44 -2%	56.1 -30%	51.3 -19%	46.9 -9%	46 -7%
Idle Upper Side *	25.2	23.6 6%	27 -7%	26.8 -6%	28.5 -13%	25.2 -0%	26.6 -6%
Idle Bottom *	25.4	23.6 7%	27 -6%	27.3 -7%	29.6 -17%	26 -2%	29.2 -15%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

MacBook Pro 13仍然配备了立体声扬声器，与许多其他超极本和副本相比，其声音非常好，而且更好。与拥有更多扬声器的Apple 系统相比（如MacBook Pro 14)，声音缺乏一点力量和空间感。我们已经迫不及待地想测试配备新的四扬声器音响系统的新MacBook Air。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--使用新的M2，电池运行时间将近20小时

消耗功率

MacBook Pro 13非常高效，尤其是在工作负荷较轻的场景下，但之前采用M1 SoC的MBP 13已经是这种情况。我们的负载测量再次表明M2芯片的功耗增加。压力测试结果也证实，M2的全部潜力无法长期利用。我们测得的功率高达56W，后来稳定在48W左右。因此，67W的电源适配器是完全足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.29 Watt
Idle	1.77 / 6.7 / 6.9 Watt
Load	30.9 / 56 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.30	Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ256HBJD, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Phison Electronics PS5012, LTPS, 2520x1680, 13.40	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40	Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		5%	12%	-49%	-28%	-41%	-52%	1%	-64%
Idle Minimum *	1.77	1.67 6%	1.9 -7%	4.8 -171%	4.3 -143%	4.2 -137%	5.7 -222%	1.952 ?(1.1 - 2.54, n=6) -10%	4.9 ?(1.77 - 11.8, n=61, last 2 years) -177%
Idle Average *	6.7	6.7 -0%	6.4 4%	8.7 -30%	6 10%	8.1 -21%	6 10%	8.71 ?(6 - 11.2, n=5) -30%	8.36 ?(4.6 - 17.4, n=61, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Maximum *	6.9	7.4 -7%	7 -1%	10.1 -46%	8.8 -28%	9 -30%	12.3 -78%	7.81 ?(2.6 - 11.5, n=6) -13%	10.4 ?(5.1 - 22.4, n=61, last 2 years) -51%
Load Average *	30.9	28 9%	25 19%	45.6 -48%	36 -17%	41.7 -35%	44.4 -44%	24.6 ?(9.1 - 33.6, n=6) 20%	45.9 ?(19.1 - 83.3, n=60, last 2 years) -49%
Witcher 3 ultra *	38.9			42.4 -9%	32.9 15%	40.1 -3%	36.5 6%
Load Maximum *	56	47.5 15%	30.3 46%	49.5 12%	60 -7%	68 -21%	47.8 15%	34.5 ?(10.2 - 56, n=6) 38%	66 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=61, last 2 years) -18%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.9 (37.2-39.6)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø45.3 (38.7-56)

Power Consumption external screen

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø29 (28.2-29.9)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø34.4 (32.8-35.7)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø9.78 (9.13-11.2)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø25.3 (24.4-27.2)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.63 (2.46-3.53)

电池运行时间

58.2Wh的电池与M2 SoC相结合，也能使运行时间超过19小时，这与前一型号基本相同。前一个型号.我们在调整亮度为150尼特的情况下进行了测试（从最大亮度开始减少7大步和2小步）。当你使用全亮度时，Wi-Fi运行时间下降到近10小时，这仍然是一个优秀的结果。Windows的对手们无法跟上这些结果。

Apple 应该再看看充电速度，因为当设备打开时，用67W的电源适配器从空电池完全充电需要2.5小时以上。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Safari 15.5)		19h 04min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 15.5)		9h 46min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		19h 13min

	Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 13 Late 2020 M1 Entry (8 / 256 GB) M1, M1 8-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh	Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry M1, M1 7-Core GPU, 49.9 Wh	Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book2 Pro 13 NP930XED-KA1DE i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh	Huawei MateBook 13s i5 11300H i5-11300H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 60 Wh	Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		4%	-16%	-37%	-40%	-47%	-66%	-26%	-38%
H.264	1153	1152 0%		912 -21%	693 -40%	661 -43%		900 -22%	794 ?(426 - 1153, n=30, last 2 years) -31%
WiFi v1.3	1144	1223 7%	960 -16%	550 -52%	695 -39%	563 -51%	391 -66%	816 -29%	629 ?(303 - 1144, n=63, last 2 years) -45%

Pros

+ 高效和强大的Apple M2 SoC

+ 制造质量和标志性设计

+ 非常高的系统性能

+ 非常好的显示屏

+ 良好的扬声器

+ 非常长的电池运行时间

+ 在日常情况下通常是无声的

Cons

- 在CPU/GPU综合工作负荷下，风扇非常嘈杂

- 弱的720p网络摄像头

- Wi-Fi 6限制在80MHz

- 既没有MagSafe、Thunderbolt 4，也没有PCIe 4.0

结论--MacBook Pro 13仍然是一款非常好的副笔记本

在审查中。 Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022。测试模型由Apple 德国提供。

2022年的MacBook Pro 13一开始可能看起来像回收，因为除了新的M2 SoC之外，该设备与旧型号完全相同。这也意味着你再次得到了触摸条，尽管所有其他的MacBooks都改回了传统功能键。我们不得不承认，看到MBP 13的另一次迭代，我们也很惊讶。

这款笔记本电脑显然是熟悉的，但这并不改变它仍然是一款非常好的次笔记本的事实。你可以得到一个稳定性很好的机箱，一个非常好的显示屏，良好的输入设备，新的M2芯片非常强大和高效。MacBook在大部分时间里也是静音的，整个包装只是工作得非常好。用户体验很好，这也是舒适功能的结果，如显示屏的自动亮度控制或键盘照明。一些笔记本电脑也提供这些功能，但往往没有那么可靠。电池运行时间再次非常长，超过19小时，与同等的Windows机器相比好得多。

配备新的M2处理器的MacBook Pro 13再次成为一款非常好的次笔记本。有一些缺点，但它们并不真正影响用户体验，整个包装只是工作得非常好。

新的M2处理器比以前更快，但我们很快会在另一篇文章中仔细研究。特别是处理器部分消耗了更多的电力，而GPU显示出更大的性能提升。总而言之，M2只是需要更多的电力，甚至MacBook Pro 13的主动冷却解决方案也不总是足够的。这些对于新MacBook Air M2的被动冷却来说不是好消息。 MacBook Air M2我们真的很好奇，Air将如何处理新的M2。我们还有点担心PSU的选择（默认为30W适配器），但我们必须再等一等，看看结果。

我们也不认为Apple ，继续提供小型MacBook Pro 13的时间会很长，因为MBP 13和新的MacBook Air M2正处于相同的价格范围。新款MacBook Air的规格也被提升到同一水平，配备了500尼特的P3显示屏，因此唯一的区别是主动冷却。仅仅这一方面是否能证明 "专业 "的称号是有问题的。Apple ，继续推出MacBook Air M1，在1000美元的细分市场拥有一款产品，这当然是合理的，但是新的Air和MBP 13是直接的竞争对手。我们怀疑Apple ，在某个时候（也许当现有库存全部售出时）将停产MBP 13，只提供13英寸MacBook Air。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

新的2022年MacBook Pro 13将于6月24日上市。你可以从百思买订购，价格为1299美元的入门级机型或我们的评测配置，配备16GB内存和1TB SSD存储，价格为1899美元，从Apple 商店。

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 - 2022-06-21 06/21/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

90 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

95%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

60 / 75 → 80%

Weight

71 / 20-75 → 92%

Battery

92%

Display

93%

Games Performance

82 / 78 → 100%

Application Performance

96 / 85 → 100%

Temperature

90%

Noise

91%

Audio

90 / 91 → 98%

Camera

35 / 85 → 41%

Average

83%

92%

Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1616 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 388744 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2笔记本电脑评测--新 M2的首次亮相Apple

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-06-22 (Update: 2022-06-22)

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2笔记本电脑评测--新 M2的首次亮相Apple

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 铝制MacBook没有变化

尺寸比较

连接性 - MBP 13再次采用雷电3技术

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 触摸条的寿命比预期长

显示屏 - 没有凹槽的MacBook Pro 13

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 -Apple M2，16GB内存

处理器 -Apple M2

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

存储设备

GPU性能

游戏性能

排放物 - MBP 13通常是无声的，但风扇可能很烦人

系统噪音

温度

发言人

Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

能源管理--使用新的M2，电池运行时间将近20小时

消耗功率

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Power Consumption external screen

电池运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论--MacBook Pro 13仍然是一款非常好的副笔记本

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare