Notebookcheck

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro回顾--最适合内容创作者的多媒体笔记本电脑?

完整版的M1 Pro性能如何? 我们回顾了新的MacBook Pro 16,它配备了Apple"最新的M1 Pro处理器的最强大版本,有16个GPU核心。Mini-LED面板再次给人留下深刻印象,就像在较小的14英寸机型上一样,有很棒的图片。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Apple ARM Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt Workstation
Apple 重新引入了 "有灰尘的 "端口。
Apple 重新引入了 "有灰尘的 "端口。

除了新的MacBook Pro 14,我们已经评测过了,Apple ,还推出了完全翻新的较大的MacBook Pro 16版本。它也可以使用新的M1 Pro和M1 Max芯片,并结合16英寸Mini-LED屏幕。我们的评测单位是配备16个GPU核心的M1 Pro SoC的型号;配备M1 Max和32个GPU核心的MacBook Pro 16的评测将在几天后进行。

我们在Apple"在线商店 "购买了我们的评论单元。它是配备M1 Pro SoC和16GB内存的基本型号;我们只勾选了较大的1TB固态硬盘。这个配置的价格是2979欧元(约合3,409美元)。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2021 Series)
Processor
Apple M1 Pro 10 x 2.1 - 3.2 GHz, 30 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR5-6400
Display
16.20 inch 16:10, 3456 x 2234 pixel 254 PPI, Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP1024R, 1024 GB 
, 947 GB free
Connections
0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 355.7 x 248.1
Battery
99.6 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple macOS 12 Monterey
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 Speakers, 3D Audio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W USB-C Power Adapter, 12 Months Warranty
Released
10/25/2021
Weight
2.153 kg, Power Supply: 353 g
Price
2979 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Comparison of potential competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
93.2 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
89.7 %
11/2019
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M
2 kg16.2 mm16.00"3072x1920
89.8 %
11/2021
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2 kg17.7 mm16.00"3840x2400
88.4 %
09/2021
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3456x2160
87.3 %
08/2021
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg18 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.9 %
10/2021
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080

外壳 - 新款MacBook Pro 16更显笨重

两款新机型MacBook Pro 16和MacBook Pro 14的底盘设计。MacBook Pro 14是相同的,而且都感觉相当笨重,因为机箱不是锥形的,所以机箱高度在任何地方都基本相同。然而,新的MBP之间的主观差异MBP 16和旧的MBP 16之间的主观差异,与新的MacBook Pro 14和旧的13英寸机型之间的差异相比,并不那么明显。13英寸机型.不过新机型仍然明显比旧的MBP 16厚(见下面的对比图片)。

MacBook Pro 16 2021(左)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(左)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(左)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(左)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(左)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(左)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(底部)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(顶部)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(底部)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(顶部)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2021(底部)与MacBook Pro 14 2021(顶部)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2019(左)与MacBook Pro 16 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2019(左)与MacBook Pro 16 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2019(左)与MacBook Pro 16 2021(右)相比。
MacBook Pro 16 2019(正面)与MacBook Pro 16 2021(背面)相比。

机箱本身的质量再次基本无懈可击(就像较小的MBP 14)。 Apple,铝制一体式机身设计再次给人留下了非常高质量的印象,两种颜色(银色和太空灰)都不太容易受到灰尘或指纹的影响。底座非常结实,没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音。盖子总体上也非常坚固,但与较小的MBP 14类似,我们可以再次用集中的压力在屏幕上激起一些涟漪,尽管这在实践中不应该是一个问题。

铰链也给较大的MacBook Pro留下了良好的印象。用一只手打开盖子没有问题,而且在小角度下不会自动掉下来,但是在调整打开角度(最大135度)时,与较小的兄弟姐妹相比,弹跳的幅度略大。这是由于屏幕面积较大的缘故。

新机型比老款MacBook Pro 16更笨重,但与Windows的竞争对手相比,情况有所不同,比如16英寸的竞争对手联想ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4.其他对手的占地面积较小,但它们也配备了略小的15.6英寸面板。不过,MacBook更纤细。它的重量约为2.1公斤,比竞争对手要重一些,但差别不大。

Size comparison

359.5 mm 253.8 mm 17.7 mm 2 kg358 mm 246 mm 16.2 mm 2 kg355.7 mm 248.1 mm 16.8 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 235 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg345 mm 230 mm 18 mm 1.9 kg

连接性 - MagSafe回来了

带状态指示灯的MagSafe连接器
带状态指示灯的MagSafe连接器
三星X5 Thunderbolt SSD
三星X5 Thunderbolt SSD

从纸面上看,新的MacBook Pro 16可能失去了一个Thunderbolt端口,因为现在你 "只 "得到三个而不是四个USB-C端口(更新为Thunderbolt 4)。然而,无论如何,其中一个TB端口通常会被电源适配器挡住,现在由MagSafe连接器负责,它已经回归。你也可以通过USB-C为MBP 16充电,但最多只能达到100瓦。还有两个熟悉的连接器也卷土重来。HDMI输出以及SDCX读卡器。一个USB-A端口可能也会适合,但缺乏它意味着你可能会不时地需要适配器。

端口标准只有Thunderbolt 4是最新的,而HDMI只支持2.0标准,所以外部4K显示器被限制在60 Hz。配备M1 Pro的SKU可以驱动多达两个外部4K屏幕,频率为60 Hz,而配备M1 Max的SKU可以驱动多达三个外部6K屏幕(60 Hz)和一个额外的4K显示器(60 Hz)。

每个Thunderbolt 4端口都通过40GB/s接口连接,我们设法用一个外部固态硬盘获得超过2.5GB/s的传输率。外接显示器和扩展坞仍有一些问题(传输率限于USB 3.0速度),但这是由新的macOS Monterey造成的。

左侧。MagSafe 3, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, USB-4, DisplayPort, Power Delivery), 3.5 mm耳机
左侧。MagSafe 3, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, USB-4, DisplayPort, Power Delivery), 3.5 mm耳机
右侧。SD卡读卡器,USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,USB-4,DisplayPort,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0
右侧。SD卡读卡器,USB-C和Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,USB-4,DisplayPort,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.0

SD卡阅读器

当我们从参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60 UHS-II)复制图片时,我们确定最大传输速率为121 MB/s。这里仍有改进的余地,因为竞争对手如戴尔XPS 15联想的ThinkPad P1 G4管理更高的传输速率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
  (AV Pro V60)
224 MB/s ∼100% +85%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE
  (AV PRO V60)
204 MB/s ∼91% +69%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s ∼54%
Average of class Multimedia
  (18.1 - 226, n=68, last 2 years)
80.1 MB/s ∼36% -34%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
  (AV Pro V60)
73.8 MB/s ∼33% -39%

沟通

Apple'的MacBook Pro 16不支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准,这在高端笔记本电脑中越来越普遍。制造商列出的最大传输速度为1.2Gbps,这意味着它只支持80MHz的Wi-Fi连接。根据路由器的不同,可能会有轻微的差异(华硕ROG Rapture管理的传输速率比我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120略好),但支持160 MHz的Windows竞争者在这方面肯定有优势。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1419 (1169min - 1609max) MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1368 (669min - 1440max) MBit/s ∼96% +77%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1076 (944min - 1117max) MBit/s ∼76% +39%
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 1563, n=85, last 2 years)
998 MBit/s ∼70% +29%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (405 - 1750, n=101)
789 MBit/s ∼56% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
772 (748min - 792max) MBit/s ∼54%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
766 (698min - 785max) MBit/s ∼54% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
689 (349min - 730max) MBit/s ∼49% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
581 (533min - 616max) MBit/s ∼41% -25%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1386 (1274min - 1446max) MBit/s ∼100% +59%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1363 (1311min - 1453max) MBit/s ∼98% +56%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s
1319 (1015min - 1489max) MBit/s ∼95% +51%
Average of class Multimedia
  (119 - 1558, n=85, last 2 years)
1086 MBit/s ∼78% +24%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
874 (522min - 938max) MBit/s ∼63%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
760 (404min - 869max) MBit/s ∼55% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Broadcom 802.11ac
817 (806min - 821max) MBit/s ∼59% -7%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (284 - 1414, n=101)
769 MBit/s ∼55% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
730 (645min - 824max) MBit/s ∼53% -16%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900522562700854861873730748935883896926931927935931930920921925933936928924938916927934927935831827645727643707718869821813802821769760850803654742812775625404864849792807824775793660522562700854861873730748935883896926931927935931930920921925933936928924938916927934927935831827645727643707718869821813802821769760850803654742812775625404864849792807824775793660781777761784766784761771769767772777779756772776768785779748785760792766766774767775780771698701775761776761763777777773777770766772765785766780770768775766767777773775763777758782Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Asus ROG Rapture: Ø874 (522-938)
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Netgear Nighthawk: Ø759 (404-869)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Netgear Nighthawk: Ø772 (748-792)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; Asus ROG Rapture: Ø766 (698-785)

网络摄像头

该缺口容纳了一个1080p的网络摄像头,光圈较宽(f/2.4)。与旧的720p型号相比,质量更好,M1 SoC的图像处理也有帮助,但如果你看一下iPhone的前置摄像头,还是会有点唏嘘。苹果手机iPad.iPad的Center Stage功能也无法使用,Apple ,MacBook Pro也没有配备Face ID模块。

ColorChecker
15.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
15.4 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
15 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro: 11.2 ∆E min: 3.97 - max: 24.53 ∆E

辅料

Apple ,所有型号的MacBook Pro 16都配有一个140瓦的电源适配器和一条充电线(USB-C到MagSafe 3,两米)。除了一些服务手册和两张黑色的Apple 标志贴纸,盒子里没有任何附件。

维护

像往常一样,底板是由五角螺丝固定的,相当容易拆卸。你将不得不把盖子推到前面,当你想把它放回去时,这可能是一个棘手的问题。你可以清洁两个风扇,但也就这样了。据我们来自iFixit的同事说,电池现在更容易更换,而且端口也没有焊接。

担保

保修期只有一年。你可以再加两年,费用为399欧元(约457美元)。

输入设备 - 魔术键盘和触摸识别

键盘

功能键回来了
功能键回来了

Apple ,保留了其熟悉的标准剪刀键的键盘,新键盘的打字体验与旧键盘几乎没有区别。MBP 16.敲击键盘的声音只是稍微有点闷。该键盘也用于其他MacBook机型,仍然以非常精确和均匀的反馈而令人信服,但考虑到更厚的基础单元,我们希望看到更多的键程。这也是一个品味问题,你可以非常迅速和舒适地打字,但在这个价格段有更好和更舒适的键盘的设备。

制造商现在使用黑色作为按键之间的空间,这在以前的版本中曾经是机箱的颜色。旧型号的Touch Bar也被标准功能键所取代,与目前的MacBook Air相反,它的垂直高度与所有其他按键相同。Apple ,在键盘照明方面肯定仍然领先于竞争对手,它可以自动激活/停用,强度可以按非常精细的步骤调整。大多数竞争对手只提供两到三个亮度级别,而且往往没有传感器。

Touch-ID指纹扫描仪位于右上角的电源按钮内,一个环形物突出了它,但这只是一个视觉噱头。

输入设备
输入设备

触摸板

Apple 也仍然是TrackPad方面的基准,因为光标控制(包括手势)与操作系统的结合是完美无缺的。滑行能力非常好,而且有很多选项可以配置(比如用三个手指移动窗口)。

显示屏 - 液体视网膜XDR迷你LED

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Apple ,14英寸和16英寸MacBook Pro机型的像素密度都达到了255 ppi。由于显示屏显然更大,分辨率也更高。Apple ,而不是IPS屏幕,现在使用Mini-LED面板。它可以管理极低的黑值和非常高的对比度,类似于OLED面板。然而,由于该技术,当明亮的内容显示在黑暗的背景上时,会出现明显的光晕效果。不过这只是一个小小的批评,因为主观的画面印象非常好。所有的内容都非常清晰明了,因为尽管分辨率很高,但macOS没有任何缩放问题,黑色是真正的黑色,这导致了极高的图像对比度。特别是HDR的内容看起来很好,而且视角的稳定性也很好。

最大HDR亮度
最大HDR亮度

像在较小的MacBook Pro 14 Apple,官方的亮度规格只适用于HDR图像。在APL为50的情况下(平均画面水平,明亮和黑暗内容的均匀分布),我们可以测量到高达1620尼特的峰值亮度,在完全白色的图像(至少是带有小黑边的16:9视频)中仍然非常好的1174尼特,所以我们可以确认Apple的说法。然而,这在大多数时候并没有真正的帮助,因为大多数日常的东西使用SDR内容,其中亮度再次被限制在500尼特多一点,这与前代产品相当。迷你LED面板有一个优势,因为它有卓越的对比度。只要有HDR图像的应用(例如Final Cut的预览窗口)需要更多的亮度,面板就会提供。

在15kHz左右的持续PWM闪烁是另一个问题,我们甚至可以在最大HDR亮度下检测到它。这个频率非常高,对大多数用户来说不是问题,但如果你对闪烁非常敏感,新MacBook Pro 16的面板就不适合你了。这种持续的闪烁也使人很难确定响应时间。根据我们的测量,它们是相当慢的,但你在实践中并没有真正注意到重影。看起来,Apple,动态刷新率高达120赫兹的专业运动技术有一定的帮助。例如,当你浏览操作系统时,你会注意到更平滑的过渡,但并不是所有Apple自己的应用程序都支持更高的刷新率。Safari浏览器就是这些应用之一,所以还不要指望更平滑的滚动。

凹槽和它旁边的区域(用于菜单项)基本上位于常规的16:10长宽比屏幕之上,并没有挡住面板的任何部分。凹槽看起来不是很吸引人,而且还可能存在一些功能问题,但是已经有工具可以将菜单栏涂黑,所以你永远不会看到凹槽。

493
cd/m²
487
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
514
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
501
cd/m²
496
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Liquid Retina XDR
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 514 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 497.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 514 cd/m²
Contrast: 25700:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Display
-1%
4%
3%
-19%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.1
85.7
-14%
99.9
1%
99.9
1%
66.9
-32%
99.3
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.4
-1%
100
0%
100
0%
97.1
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
88
98.9
12%
98.1
11%
95.3
8%
69
-22%
Response Times
275%
19%
30%
31%
90%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42.8 ?(19.6, 23.2)
52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5)
-22%
55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4)
-29%
3.6 ?(2, 1.6)
92%
2.4 ?(1, 1.4)
94%
4.2 ?(2.6, 1.6)
90%
58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)
-36%
Response Time Black / White *
91.6 ?(76, 15.6)
34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1)
62%
31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8)
66%
2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6)
97%
2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3)
97%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
89%
40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)
56%
PWM Frequency
14880
131700
785%
59.52 ?(99)
-100%
240.4 ?(52)
-98%
14880
0%
Screen
-262%
-269%
-49%
-85%
-227%
35%
Brightness middle
514
519
1%
630
23%
362
-30%
379.6
-26%
353.4
-31%
489
-5%
Brightness
497
477
-4%
622
25%
367
-26%
380
-24%
340
-32%
479
-4%
Brightness Distribution
95
86
-9%
90
-5%
97
2%
95
0%
92
-3%
94
-1%
Black Level *
0.02
0.39
-1850%
0.41
-1950%
0.06
-200%
0.31
-1450%
0.01
50%
Contrast
25700
1331
-95%
1537
-94%
6033
-77%
1140
-96%
48900
90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
2.28
-63%
2.2
-57%
2.1
-50%
5.15
-268%
2.17
-55%
0.8
43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.8
6.54
-134%
5
-79%
4.1
-46%
7.79
-178%
5.69
-103%
1.3
54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
0.9
61%
2.7
-17%
1.4
39%
2.6
-13%
3.4
-48%
1.1
52%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2145 0%
2.26 97%
2.18 101%
1.99 111%
2.2 100%
2.24 98%
CCT
6792 96%
6572 99%
6886 94%
6608 98%
6166 105%
6830 95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.86
1
2.5
3.1
1.05
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
78
Total Average (Program / Settings)
7% / -115%
-84% / -163%
-5% / -21%
-17% / -34%
-52% / -130%
14% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间DCI-P3)。

我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计进行的分析表明,新的MBP 16的面板校准与14英寸设备相比并不出色。 14英寸设备开箱即用。色温略微过冷,灰度中存在轻微的偏蓝。不幸的是,我们无法用我们的设备校准该面板。虽然颜色以及灰度的DeltaE-2000平均偏差都已经小于3,所以这是在一个非常高的水平上的呻吟,对图片/视频编辑没有任何限制。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
91.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 76 ms rise
↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.6 ms rise
↘ 23.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21061 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

MacBook Pro 16确实有一个光亮的屏幕表面,但它不像其他许多有光亮显示屏或触摸屏的笔记本电脑那样反光。只要你避免反射,即使在较亮的环境中,你仍然可以相当舒适地在户外工作,但该面板显然会从更高的亮度水平中受益。如果你看到Apple's specs并希望改善户外能力,你会在这方面感到失望。


性能 - 带有10/16个核心的M1 Pro

不同于较小的MacBook Pro 14,较大的16英寸机型总是以完整版本的M1 Pro SoC发货,所以你得到10个CPU核心(2个效率核心和8个性能核心)与16个GPU核心的组合。如果你选择类似的组件,这两个型号的价格差异只有230欧元(约263美元)。

SoC CPU Cores GPU Cores RAM 附加价格
M1 Pro 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 16 16或32 GB
M1 Max 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 24 32或64GB 230欧元(~263美元)
M1 Max 2个效率核心和8个性能核心 32 32或64GB 410欧元(~469美元)

Apple 还提供两个版本的新M1 Max芯片(有24或32个GPU核心)作为可选升级。CPU性能将基本保持不变;一些应用程序可能从更多的内存中受益。你可以用M1 Pro升级到32GB内存,用M1 Max一路升级到64GB。

处理器 - 具有10个核心的M1 Pro

M1 Pro由两个效率集群(两个核心,最高2,064 MHz)与两个性能集群相结合,每个集群有4个核心(最高3.2 GHz)。核心的基本架构与去年的Apple M1 SoC没有区别,例如MacBook Air和MacBook Pro 13使用的就是这种系统。这意味着单核性能也具有可比性,可选的M1 Max芯片也是如此。Apple ,在这方面可以跟上AMD和英特尔的现代移动处理器,但效率更高(~7 W封装和4 W核心与~20 W @英特尔和~15 W @AMD)。

在MacBook Pro 16上原生运行的Cinebench R23 Multi测试,其结果是封装功耗为~30W,核心功耗为~27W。这与目前的AMD Ryzen 7 5800U(Zen 3,8个核心,16个线程),但性能较低(~20%),与较小的8核M1 Pro芯片。AMD和英特尔都有在45W领域性能更强的移动CPU,但它们的耗电量也更大。新款MacBook Pro 16的一个主要优势是性能稳定,无论是在持续工作负荷下还是在电池电量下都是如此。更多的CPU基准测试可在 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

010521031542052563073584094510501155126013651470157516801785189019951674.91678.351676.521684.071682.091681.521680.811675.61681.241681.11683.011674.551677.991676.941681.171678.491677.781679.611683.791679.681680.111677.641680.251675.881678.561681.871685.271684.851690.121688.261687.191686.341682.791686.411685.911435140713861396139814011401140614071405140214031409140714081407140914081409140314051409141014081405140614111408140714101405140614081406140614021407141414131403140214131405140914091401140714071404141114091405140714111406140314081405140514071410140914071362.311326.261311.391314.061314.581305.441269.121297.231275.921295.171271.51304.81284.231295.881279.061297.351280.71297.731283.611310.491270.081300.471268.871298.741283.941988.071908.761871.081840.691828.661819.751805.381798.81790.831792.441777.071793.321787.231777.381775.491769.521778.091773.211773.441776.361768.581776.281766.781759.481766.082024.191795.411719.621716.151694.561589.381592.361604.241764.291641.031604.31636.061638.141622.591637.131644.471621.531629.861618.521618.841620.481643.391641.291614.41639.212009.951786.831594.261566.051577.781576.61568.631574.681576.61580.531586.421599.31587.361601.351646.631593.311589.381604.111648.741647.651598.341636.061647.651607.331613.421841.111804.241802.051822.661804.481802.371820.421789.951808.561813.241816.371817.271813.811806.281802.781813.41792.841801.881802.451790.991819.511820.081813.811796.861795.981808.891811.761819.341802.531792.681811.351797.591803.021809.051814.221801.961803.351810.771805.711796.541812.251787.471809.381816.781809.221765.461813.41808.151793.81804.161850.481828.741861.761866.111776.591868.811863.411870.031867.851873.891866.981868.721864.451864.711874.061876.521874.851870.31875.031869.771867.411871.171872.661871.351873.011861.761867.241874.331868.631867.151865.851869.951871.081860.721876.71873.711869.861866.021867.151869.861876.961871.261870.991870.31875.121872.481868.371870.121872.41863.151314.671313.241315.531312.811314.581315.571314.671319.741313.631312.211305.361308.91309.591307.921308.131308.261304.721309.461308.31305.991310.321303.741311.131310.231312.29Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro: Ø1681 (1674.55-1690.12)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1803 (1759.48-1988.07)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -8!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
84.8 pt ∼85%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro -5!
Apple M1 Pro
84.1 pt ∼84%
Average Apple M1 Pro -5!
 
84.1 pt ∼84%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
81.8 pt ∼82%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
80.5 pt ∼81%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
80.1 pt ∼80%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
74.4 pt ∼74%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
60.9 pt ∼61%
Average of class Multimedia
 
54 pt ∼54%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
12370 Points ∼100% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12197 (11396.1min - 12197.5max) Points ∼99% -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
12166 (11410min - 12166.4max) Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
11935 Points ∼96% -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
10531 Points ∼85% -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points ∼77% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
8758 Points ∼71% -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
8747 (8681.12min - 8746.74max) Points ∼71% -29%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3121 - 13205, n=66, last 2 years)
7441 Points ∼60% -40%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1569 Points ∼100% +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
1552 Points ∼99% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points ∼98%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
1534 Points ∼98% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points ∼98% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points ∼96% -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1498 Points ∼95% -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (980 - 1556, n=61, last 2 years)
1356 Points ∼86% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1140 Points ∼73% -26%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4706 Points ∼100% +73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
4663 Points ∼99% +71%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
4660 Points ∼99% +71%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
3848 Points ∼82% +41%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
3422 Points ∼73% +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
3057 Points ∼65% +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
2721 Points ∼58%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
2721 Points ∼58% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (727 - 5128, n=98, last 2 years)
2436 Points ∼52% -10%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
610 Points ∼100% +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
607 Points ∼100% +54%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼95% +48%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼95% +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (311 - 601, n=98, last 2 years)
492 Points ∼81% +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
453 Points ∼74% +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
442 Points ∼72% +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
393 Points ∼64%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
393 Points ∼64% 0%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2024.19 Points ∼100% +20%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009.95 Points ∼99% +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
1988 (1759.48min - 1988.07max) Points ∼98% +18%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1877 (1776.59min - 1876.96max) Points ∼93% +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1841 (1765.46min - 1841.11max) Points ∼91% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points ∼83%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
1690 Points ∼83% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1435 (1401min - 1435max) Points ∼71% -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1362 (1268.87min - 1362.31max) Points ∼67% -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points ∼65% -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (334 - 2154, n=113, last 2 years)
1093 Points ∼54% -35%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
236 Points ∼100% +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
233 Points ∼99% +11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼97% +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points ∼96% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points ∼89% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points ∼89%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
209 Points ∼89% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (126 - 242, n=97, last 2 years)
195 Points ∼83% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼78% -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
184 Points ∼78% -12%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (183 - 1439, n=88, last 2 years)
516 Seconds * ∼100% -182%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
343 Seconds * ∼66% -87%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
298 Seconds * ∼58% -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
259 Seconds * ∼50% -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
257 Seconds * ∼50% -40%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
254 Seconds * ∼49% -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
183.3 Seconds * ∼36%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
183 Seconds * ∼35% -0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
53597 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
50552 MIPS ∼94%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
50050 MIPS ∼93%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
42570 MIPS ∼79%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
39455 MIPS ∼74%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8984 - 59653, n=85, last 2 years)
30183 MIPS ∼56%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
5773 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
5762 MIPS ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5480 MIPS ∼95%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
5427 MIPS ∼94%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3406 - 5865, n=85, last 2 years)
4975 MIPS ∼86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
4837 MIPS ∼84%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
12499 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points ∼80% -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
9451 Points ∼76% -24%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
8164 Points ∼65% -35%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
7286 Points ∼58% -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
7109 Points ∼57% -43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1604 - 12708, n=87, last 2 years)
5993 Points ∼48% -52%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro
 
1768 Points ∼100% 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
1702 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
1659 Points ∼94% -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
1540 Points ∼87% -13%
Average of class Multimedia
  (813 - 1782, n=87, last 2 years)
1369 Points ∼77% -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
1115 Points ∼63% -37%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15 fps ∼100%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.5 fps ∼97%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
14.4 fps ∼96%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.4 fps ∼83%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
10.6 fps ∼71%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1.39 - 15.9, n=84, last 2 years)
8.17 fps ∼54%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
58.9 s * ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
16.5 s * ∼28%
Average of class Multimedia
  (30.2 - 99.2, n=84, last 2 years)
54.7 s * ∼93%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
48.6 s * ∼83%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.9 s * ∼78%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
45.8 s * ∼78%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.6904 sec * ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H
0.661 sec * ∼96%
Average of class Multimedia
  (0.4851 - 1.002, n=86, last 2 years)
0.619 sec * ∼90%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.567 sec * ∼82%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.551 sec * ∼80%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.55 sec * ∼80%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
Intel Core i7-11850H
0.541 sec * ∼78%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1690 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
85.51 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
209 Points
Help

系统性能

新的MacBook Pro 16是一台非常快的多媒体笔记本电脑,所有任务的执行都非常快,没有明显的延迟。由于Rosetta 2,你也可以使用英特尔应用程序,而且效果很好,但当你使用Photoshop或Premiere Pro等复杂的应用程序时,你会注意到性能上的差异,M1版本要快得多。我们包括了PugetBench的结果,但它们并不具有真正的代表性,因为它们只在模拟的英特尔版本的Adobe应用程序中运行。

跨平台基准测试CrossMark显示,配备M1 Pro的MacBook Pro 16比小型的MacBook Pro 14的优势,但ThinkPad P1 G4配有酷睿i7和GeForce RTX 3070更快。这显然取决于你使用的软件,如果你能利用ProRes,例如,配备M1芯片的MacBooks将有巨大优势。

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Average of class Multimedia
  (133 - 202, n=3, last 2 years)
166 fps ∼100% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
163 fps ∼98%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
163 fps ∼98% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
133 fps ∼80% -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
48 fps ∼29% -71%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
39 fps ∼100% +44%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
27 fps ∼69%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
27 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (21 - 29, n=3, last 2 years)
25.7 fps ∼66% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
21 fps ∼54% -22%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1644 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1490 - 1604, n=4, last 2 years)
1559 Points ∼95% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1556 Points ∼95%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
1556 Points ∼95% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
1490 Points ∼91% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
940 Points ∼57% -40%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1613 Points ∼100% +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1305 - 1366, n=4, last 2 years)
1344 Points ∼83% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1342 Points ∼83%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
1342 Points ∼83% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
1305 Points ∼81% -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
937 Points ∼58% -30%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Multimedia
  (1915 - 2152, n=4, last 2 years)
2056 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
2054 Points ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
2054 Points ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
1915 Points ∼93% -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1726 Points ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
971 Points ∼47% -53%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1507 Points ∼100% +43%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1044 - 1080, n=4, last 2 years)
1064 Points ∼71% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
1055 Points ∼70%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
1055 Points ∼70% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
1044 Points ∼69% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
860 Points ∼57% -18%
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
971 Points ∼100% +40%
Average of class Multimedia
  (667 - 809, n=4, last 2 years)
720 Points ∼74% +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
711 Points ∼73% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
694 Points ∼71%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
694 Points ∼71% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
667 Points ∼69% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
667 Points ∼69% -4%
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
107.6 Points ∼100% +37%
Average of class Multimedia
  (75.9 - 98.5, n=4, last 2 years)
82.3 Points ∼76% +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
78.8 Points ∼73%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
78.8 Points ∼73% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76 Points ∼71% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
75.9 Points ∼71% -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
66.8 Points ∼62% -15%
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
88.6 Points ∼100% +27%
Average of class Multimedia
  (60.3 - 86.5, n=4, last 2 years)
71.3 Points ∼80% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
69.7 Points ∼79%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
69.7 Points ∼79% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
68.5 Points ∼77% -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.3 Points ∼68% -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
59.5 Points ∼67% -15%
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
105.5 Points ∼100% +53%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.8 Points ∼78% +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
73.9 Points ∼70% +7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (64.8 - 81.8, n=4, last 2 years)
72.7 Points ∼69% +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
69.1 Points ∼65%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
69.1 Points ∼65% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
64.8 Points ∼61% -6%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
837 Points ∼100% +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (658 - 1080, n=4, last 2 years)
831 Points ∼99% +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
756 Points ∼90% +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
748 Points ∼89%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
748 Points ∼89% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
658 Points ∼79% -12%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
58.3 Points ∼100% +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
53.3 Points ∼91% +31%
Average of class Multimedia
  (38.9 - 53.3, n=4, last 2 years)
46.5 Points ∼80% +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
40.7 Points ∼70%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
40.7 Points ∼70% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
38.9 Points ∼67% -4%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
177.7 Points ∼100% +23%
Average of class Multimedia
  (104 - 216, n=4, last 2 years)
161 Points ∼91% +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
145 Points ∼82%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
145 Points ∼82% 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
117 Points ∼66% -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
104 Points ∼59% -28%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
57.2 Points ∼100% +70%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
43.7 Points ∼76% +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (31.6 - 54.8, n=4, last 2 years)
41 Points ∼72% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
33.7 Points ∼59%
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
33.7 Points ∼59% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
31.6 Points ∼55% -6%

存储设备

Apple ,新的MacBook Pro机型采用更快的PCIe 4.0存储。基本型号配备的是512GB固态硬盘;我们的测试装置配备的是可选的1TB硬盘。读取性能与较小的固态硬盘相似,但1TB型号在写入性能方面更快。总而言之,传输率非常好,超过5GB/s。在AmorphousDiskMark 3.1中,我们也看到非常好的结果。只有4K写入结果与高端PCIe固态硬盘相比相当低。Apple ,提供高达8TB的内部固态硬盘存储,但价格是天文数字(从512GB的固态硬盘跳到8TB是2760欧元(约3158美元))。更多的SSD基准数据列在 这里.

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple SSD AP1024R
99 pt ∼99%
Average Apple SSD AP1024R
 
99 pt ∼99%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
 
87.9 pt ∼88%
Average of class Multimedia
 
86.2 pt ∼86%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
50 pt ∼50%
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
 
5447.5 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple SSD AP1024R
5334 MB/s ∼98%
Average Apple SSD AP1024R
 
5334 MB/s ∼98% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2622 - 5448, n=5, last 2 years)
4797 MB/s ∼88% -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
2788 MB/s ∼51% -48%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple SSD AP1024R
5888 MB/s ∼100%
Average Apple SSD AP1024R
 
5888 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2519 - 6243, n=5, last 2 years)
4963 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
 
4462.5 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Apple SSD AP1024 7171
2880 MB/s ∼49% -51%

GPU性能

与较小的MBP 14 Apple ,MBP 16只配备了最快的M1 Pro SoC,它提供10个CPU内核和16个GPU内核。与14核GPU相比,其优势仅有8-12%,这取决于基准测试,所以并不很大。Nvidia的RTX 3050 Ti戴尔XPS 15明显更快,而在性能方面与Apple iGPU最接近的对手是专用的GeForce GTX 1650来自Nvidia。然而,M1 iGPU的效率更高,需要的电力更少。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 -5!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H
100 pt ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
91.1 pt ∼91%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
64.1 pt ∼64%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
64.1 pt ∼64%
Average of class Multimedia
 
60.7 pt ∼61%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
57.3 pt ∼57%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED -5!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
53.3 pt ∼53%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M -4!
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
39.7 pt ∼40%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -5!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10.5 pt ∼11%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
15496 Points ∼100% +50%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10352 Points ∼67%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
10352 Points ∼67% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1765 - 20228, n=7, last 2 years)
9362 Points ∼60% -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points ∼60% -10%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
14113 Points ∼100% +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10351 Points ∼73%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
10351 Points ∼73% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9089 Points ∼64% -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1824 - 18779, n=7, last 2 years)
8970 Points ∼64% -13%
Geekbench 5.3
OpenCL Score 5.3
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H
109988 Points ∼100% +190%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
58601 Points ∼53% +55%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
51568 Points ∼47% +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
37867 Points ∼34%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
37867 Points ∼34% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points ∼32% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (4576 - 108378, n=76, last 2 years)
28909 Points ∼26% -24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11499 Points ∼10% -70%
Metal Score 5.3
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
58191 Points ∼100% +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (37319 - 67868, n=4, last 2 years)
51373 Points ∼88% +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
42115 Points ∼72%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
42115 Points ∼72% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
37319 Points ∼64% -11%
GFXBench
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
636 fps ∼100% +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
436 fps ∼69%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
436 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (33.6 - 752, n=6, last 2 years)
395 fps ∼62% -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps ∼62% -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
254 fps ∼40% -42%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
240 fps ∼100% +45%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
166 fps ∼69%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
166 fps ∼69% 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (11.4 - 310, n=6, last 2 years)
153 fps ∼64% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps ∼61% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H
94.7 fps ∼39% -43%

游戏性能

与Windows笔记本电脑相比,MacBook Pro 16的游戏能力要有限得多,因为没有那么多游戏。只有一些游戏对macOS有原生支持,一些游戏可以模拟或通过CrossWare等附加软件运行(如通过Steam的TheWitcher 3GTA V),但MacBook就是不属于游戏设备。显然,你也可以利用Apple"自己的街机游戏集 "的优势。

我们进行的游戏基准测试显示,新的MacBook Pro 16比MBP 14稍有优势。MBP 14配备14核GPU和旧的MacBook Pro 16配备专用的Radeon Pro 5500M.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127 (93min) fps ∼100% +102%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
63 (48min) fps ∼50%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
63 fps ∼50% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
58 (48min) fps ∼46% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
58 fps ∼46% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17 - 107, n=25, last 2 years)
50.2 fps ∼40% -20%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
124 (92min) fps ∼100% +118%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
57 (45min) fps ∼46%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
57 fps ∼46% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
54 (46min) fps ∼44% -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps ∼43% -7%
Average of class Multimedia
  (10 - 105, n=26, last 2 years)
45.7 fps ∼37% -20%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
115 (89min) fps ∼100% +130%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
50 (37min) fps ∼43%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
50 fps ∼43% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
46 (38min) fps ∼40% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
46 fps ∼40% -8%
Average of class Multimedia
  (8 - 92, n=26, last 2 years)
40.2 fps ∼35% -20%
Total War: Three Kingdoms
1920x1080 Medium (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
69.6 fps ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
69.6 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
64.1 (55min) fps ∼92% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
58 fps ∼83% -17%
Average of class Multimedia
  (12.3 - 127, n=14, last 2 years)
44.5 fps ∼64% -36%
1920x1080 High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
43.8 fps ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
43.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
40.5 (34min) fps ∼92% -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
36 fps ∼82% -18%
Average of class Multimedia
  (5.8 - 80, n=14, last 2 years)
26.6 fps ∼61% -39%
1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
31.8 fps ∼100%
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
31.8 fps ∼100% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M
29.7 (24min) fps ∼93% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
27 fps ∼85% -15%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3.5 - 59, n=13, last 2 years)
19.9 fps ∼63% -37%
low med. high ultra
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 54.2 43.1 fps
Civilization VI (2016) 45.5 45.5 fps
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 63 57 50 fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 114 69.6 43.8 31.8 fps
Borderlands 3 (2019) 56.6 48 34.8 26.2 fps

排放 - MBP 16非常安静

系统噪音

与14英寸机型相比,MacBook Pro 16的两个风扇要安静得多。14英寸机型即使在最大负荷的情况下,旋转速度也不会超过3000转/分钟,这导致了约37分贝(A)。如果你只对处理器或显卡施加压力,你几乎听不到超过27 dB(A)的声音(在游戏期间也是如此),因此,尽管性能很高,但该设备在正常环境下根本听不到。你可以通过工具将风扇手动设置到最大速度(约49 dB(A)),但我们在测试中从未达到这个水平。我们没有注意到任何电子噪音(如线圈啸叫)。

Noise Level

Idle
24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A)
Load
26.1 / 37.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2024.625.528.127.226.325.62522.322.221.42221.423.73126.127.625.226.626254023.523.621.724.225.124.35020.120.520.418.922.521.16318.421.123.622.123.420.18023.226.728.126.82625.71001820.822.918.318.82112523.823.625.622.722.12416025.727.129.526.32627.62001921.628.220.219.322.225019.524.131.317.817.623.731519.425.63417.817.725.340020.224.53320.819.524.450015.42131.514.91521.363015.924.935.212.411.824.680015.727.835.111.511.226.710001527.336.210.810.526.2125013.127.638.510.41026.6160012.329.339.910.210.128.620001228.440.710.710.626.8250011.426.2401110.924.7315011.323.537.211.411.322.7400011.721.838.51211.620.4500012.116.53711.91215.4630012.113.934.911.91213.5800012.112.930.612.312.312.81000012.612.725.112.512.612.712500121222.511.91212.11600011.111.217.11111.211.2SPL2637.449.52524.736.4N0.72.36.40.60.62.1median 13.1median 23.6median 34median 12median 12median 23.7Delta35.1533.15.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core
Noise
-29%
-13%
-4%
-15%
-18%
-7%
off / environment *
24.7
29.8
-21%
23.8
4%
23.8
4%
23.5
5%
25.1
-2%
24.8
-0%
Idle Minimum *
24.7
29.9
-21%
23.8
4%
23.8
4%
25.3
-2%
25.3
-2%
24.8
-0%
Idle Average *
24.7
29.9
-21%
23.8
4%
23.8
4%
25.3
-2%
25.3
-2%
24.8
-0%
Idle Maximum *
24.7
29.9
-21%
28.3
-15%
23.8
4%
25.3
-2%
25.3
-2%
24.8
-0%
Load Average *
26.1
43
-65%
38.6
-48%
36
-38%
41.2
-58%
42
-61%
27.8
-7%
Load Maximum *
37.4
46.1
-23%
47.4
-27%
38.2
-2%
49.4
-32%
51.6
-38%
49.5
-32%
Witcher 3 ultra *
45.4
47.4
36
49.4
45.6
27.8

* ... smaller is better

温度

冷却系统在M1 Pro上没有问题,尽管有安静的风扇,但在负载下表面温度并不高。特别是键盘比较小的MBP 14保持较低的温度。在大多数日常工作中,你几乎不会注意到任何升温,M1 Pro的高效架构在这方面肯定会得到回报,因为Windows的竞争对手会达到明显的高温度。在压力测试中,M1 Pro的性能也很稳定,这对于强大的Windows笔记本电脑来说是不可能的事。

Max. Load
 41 °C41 °C40 °C 
 36 °C37 °C33 °C 
 29 °C29 °C29 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 35 °C
39 °C39 °C39 °C
35 °C37 °C35 °C
31 °C32 °C32 °C
Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 35.4 °C
Power Supply (max.)  40 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 64 MAX
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).

发言人

新款MacBook Pro 16中的扬声器与旧款中已经很出色的声音系统相比有所改进。旧型号甚至性能略好于MacBook Pro 14在频率图上的表现。从主观上讲,考虑到机箱的尺寸,声音非常好,由于有四个低音单元,甚至有一些低音来自于薄薄的机箱。具有6个扬声器的音响系统也支持3D音频,而且效果出奇地好。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2026.325.82521.422.1312624.94025.127.65022.532.56323.448.7802655.810018.860.912522.167.2160267020019.372.325017.674.231517.774.340019.575.35001571.763011.871.380011.274100010.574.212501072.7160010.172200010.672250010.975315011.374.8400011.671.750001269.763001269.6800012.371.11000012.669.6125001270.11600011.269.8SPL24.784.7N0.666.6median 12median 71.7Delta3.11.430.235.431.734.925.834.932.236.927.535.924.544.323.154.723.365.121.966.320.164.521.566.818.869.817.671.914.972.613.770.91473.611.273.711.171.610.772.312.272.411.273.511.674.511.775.7127312.273.812.469.712.568.212.667.112.563.911.968.524.884.90.668.3median 12.5median 71.62.333634.529.530.93130.229.830.629.434.728.345.226.557.325.562.523.667.722.167.323.569.62271.32170.620.974.219.872.818.970.418.573.318.273.417.771.617.371.417.369.71769.41769.41767.417.166.91768.317.166.417.163.11761.917.360.13082.31.360.7median 17.7median 69.41.92.3hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 ProApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro EntryApple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (3.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 41%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 20%, worst was 65%

Apple 还改进了集成的耳机插孔,它现在支持阻抗更高的耳机,但我们的测量清楚地表明,在更高的音量下有失真现象。这意味着它不能取代高质量的外部放大器,但它现在支持高阻抗的耳机。

在50%的音量(舒适的音量)下,音频测量耳机端口
在50%的音量(舒适的音量)下,音频测量耳机端口
最小音量下的音频测量耳机端口
最小音量下的音频测量耳机端口
在几乎最大音量下的音频测量耳机端口
在几乎最大音量下的音频测量耳机端口

能源管理--M1 Pro非常高效

消耗功率

我们的空闲测量结果显示,与之前使用SDR内容的MacBook Pro 16类似,但当你消耗HDR内容时,会出现高达30W的峰值。我们确定负载下的平均功率略高于50W,在压力测试中高达90W,这意味着MBP 16再次比Windows的竞争对手高效得多。对于MBP 16的基本型号来说,140W的电源适配器几乎太强大了,我们有点惊讶Apple ,没有省钱,只用96W的电源适配器发货。这将不支持快速充电,但这也是较小的MBP 14的基本型号的情况。较小的MBP 14的基本型号也是如此,该型号默认使用67瓦的电源。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.23 / 3.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5 / 15.1 / 15.5 Watt
Load midlight 54 / 90 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, , Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
-9%
-58%
-17%
-87%
-145%
24%
0%
-2%
Idle Minimum *
5
3.7
26%
8.1
-62%
7.6
-52%
11
-120%
19.5
-290%
2.9
42%
5
-0%
6.04 ?(2.22 - 28.6, n=88, last 2 years)
-21%
Idle Average *
15.1
12.1
20%
20.2
-34%
9.9
34%
18.8
-25%
23.3
-54%
11.6
23%
15.1
-0%
10.7 ?(3 - 26.5, n=88, last 2 years)
29%
Idle Maximum *
15.5
17
-10%
21.9
-41%
10.8
30%
31.7
-105%
40.1
-159%
11.9
23%
15.5
-0%
13.8 ?(4.6 - 42, n=88, last 2 years)
11%
Load Average *
54
91.5
-69%
88.2
-63%
81
-50%
105.2
-95%
98.9
-83%
49.5
8%
54
-0%
66 ?(24.8 - 150, n=88, last 2 years)
-22%
Load Maximum *
90
102.3
-14%
170.6
-90%
131
-46%
171.8
-91%
214
-138%
68.5
24%
90
-0%
95.1 ?(28.8 - 235, n=88, last 2 years)
-6%
Witcher 3 ultra *
103
149
76.2
148
174
58.2

* ... smaller is better

当我们看一下内部消耗时,M1 Pro也是非常高效的(通过powermetrics),在基准测试开始时没有节流或涡轮增压峰值。

Cinebench R23通过powermetrics的内部功率
Cinebench R23通过powermetrics的内部功率
Prime95 通过功率计量学对内部功率进行压力测试
Prime95 通过功率计量学对内部功率进行压力测试
Valley GPU Benchmark的内部功率测量法
Valley GPU Benchmark的内部功率测量法

电池运行时间

使用电池供电的Cinebench R23 - 没有性能缺陷
使用电池供电的Cinebench R23 - 没有性能缺陷

16英寸MacBook Pro的电池容量为99.6Wh,因此与较小的MBP 14(69.9Wh)相比要高得多,在我们的测试中,电池运行时间也更好。我们的Wi-Fi测试在调整亮度为150尼特的情况下运行了近17个小时,在最大SDR亮度下仍有8小时左右。与以前的macOS版本相反,我们在使用全屏模式时没有看到差异。在我们采用M1 Max SoC的MBP 16(目前也在评测中)的测试装置上,一个最大亮度的HDR视频运行了约4.5小时,这比较小的MBP 14的4小时要长一些。另一方面,150尼特的标准视频可运行约17.5小时。

140瓦的电源适配器支持快速充电,30分钟后可获得50%的容量。你也可以通过USB-C端口为MBP 16充电,但它们不支持快速充电。

我们没有注意到电池供电时CPU或GPU的性能下降。与Windows竞争产品相比,这是MacBook Pro 16的又一优势,在Windows竞争产品中,强大的系统在电池供电时总是会降低性能(尤其是dGPU)。

Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Fullscreen)
16h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness
7h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 28min
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M
i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00
i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8
i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-37%
-59%
-50%
-64%
-65%
-17%
-41%
Reader / Idle
774
1159 ?(274 - 2407, n=51, last 2 years)
H.264
1048
580
-45%
429
-59%
624
-40%
900
-14%
690 ?(323 - 1122, n=33, last 2 years)
-34%
WiFi v1.3
1016
718
-29%
417
-59%
420
-59%
369
-64%
353
-65%
816
-20%
532 ?(198 - 1016, n=88, last 2 years)
-48%
Load
58
74
106
106
69
104 ?(41 - 265, n=71, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra
54
95 ?(66 - 130, n=4, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高质量和坚固的底盘
+ 显示效果好,色彩准确
+ 极高的HDR亮度
+ 非常安静的风扇
+ 非常高的系统性能
+ 效率极高的M1 Pro SoC