Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro回顾--最适合内容创作者的多媒体笔记本电脑？

Name: Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Brand: Apple

完整版的M1 Pro性能如何？ 我们回顾了新的MacBook Pro 16，它配备了Apple"最新的M1 Pro处理器的最强大版本，有16个GPU核心。Mini-LED面板再次给人留下深刻印象，就像在较小的14英寸机型上一样，有很棒的图片。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/14/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Apple ARM Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt Workstation

除了新的MacBook Pro 14，我们已经评测过了，Apple ，还推出了完全翻新的较大的MacBook Pro 16版本。它也可以使用新的M1 Pro和M1 Max芯片，并结合16英寸Mini-LED屏幕。我们的评测单位是配备16个GPU核心的M1 Pro SoC的型号；配备M1 Max和32个GPU核心的MacBook Pro 16的评测将在几天后进行。

我们在Apple"在线商店 "购买了我们的评论单元。它是配备M1 Pro SoC和16GB内存的基本型号；我们只勾选了较大的1TB固态硬盘。这个配置的价格是2979欧元（约合3,409美元）。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro (MacBook Pro 16 2021 Series)

Processor

Apple M1 Pro 10 x 2.1 - 3.2 GHz, 30 W PL1 / Sustained

Graphics adapter

Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5-6400

Display

16.20 inch 16:10, 3456 x 2234 pixel 254 PPI, Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

Apple SSD AP1024R, 1024 GB

, 947 GB free

Connections

0 USB 3.1 Gen2, 3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 16.8 x 355.7 x 248.1

Battery

99.6 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Apple macOS 12 Monterey

Camera

Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 6 Speakers, 3D Audio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 140W USB-C Power Adapter, 12 Months Warranty

Released

10/25/2021

Weight

2.153 kg, Power Supply: 353 g

Price

2979 Euro

Links

Apple homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Comparison of potential competitors

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
93.2 %	11/2021	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	2.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.20"	3456x2234
89.7 %	11/2019	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M	2 kg	16.2 mm	16.00"	3072x1920
89.8 %	11/2021	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	17.7 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
88.4 %	09/2021	Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3456x2160
87.8 %	08/2021	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3840x2160
88.9 %	10/2021	Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳 - 新款MacBook Pro 16更显笨重

两款新机型MacBook Pro 16和MacBook Pro 14的底盘设计。MacBook Pro 14是相同的，而且都感觉相当笨重，因为机箱不是锥形的，所以机箱高度在任何地方都基本相同。然而，新的MBP之间的主观差异MBP 16和旧的MBP 16之间的主观差异，与新的MacBook Pro 14和旧的13英寸机型之间的差异相比，并不那么明显。13英寸机型.不过新机型仍然明显比旧的MBP 16厚（见下面的对比图片）。

MacBook Pro 16 2021（左）与MacBook Pro 14 2021（右）相比。

MacBook Pro 16 2021（底部）与MacBook Pro 14 2021（顶部）相比。

MacBook Pro 16 2019（左）与MacBook Pro 16 2021（右）相比。

MacBook Pro 16 2019（正面）与MacBook Pro 16 2021（背面）相比。

机箱本身的质量再次基本无懈可击（就像较小的MBP 14）。 Apple，铝制一体式机身设计再次给人留下了非常高质量的印象，两种颜色（银色和太空灰）都不太容易受到灰尘或指纹的影响。底座非常结实，没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音。盖子总体上也非常坚固，但与较小的MBP 14类似，我们可以再次用集中的压力在屏幕上激起一些涟漪，尽管这在实践中不应该是一个问题。

铰链也给较大的MacBook Pro留下了良好的印象。用一只手打开盖子没有问题，而且在小角度下不会自动掉下来，但是在调整打开角度（最大135度）时，与较小的兄弟姐妹相比，弹跳的幅度略大。这是由于屏幕面积较大的缘故。

新机型比老款MacBook Pro 16更笨重，但与Windows的竞争对手相比，情况有所不同，比如16英寸的竞争对手联想ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4.其他对手的占地面积较小，但它们也配备了略小的15.6英寸面板。不过，MacBook更纤细。它的重量约为2.1公斤，比竞争对手要重一些，但差别不大。

Size comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - MagSafe回来了

从纸面上看，新的MacBook Pro 16可能失去了一个Thunderbolt端口，因为现在你 "只 "得到三个而不是四个USB-C端口（更新为Thunderbolt 4）。然而，无论如何，其中一个TB端口通常会被电源适配器挡住，现在由MagSafe连接器负责，它已经回归。你也可以通过USB-C为MBP 16充电，但最多只能达到100瓦。还有两个熟悉的连接器也卷土重来。HDMI输出以及SDCX读卡器。一个USB-A端口可能也会适合，但缺乏它意味着你可能会不时地需要适配器。

端口标准只有Thunderbolt 4是最新的，而HDMI只支持2.0标准，所以外部4K显示器被限制在60 Hz。配备M1 Pro的SKU可以驱动多达两个外部4K屏幕，频率为60 Hz，而配备M1 Max的SKU可以驱动多达三个外部6K屏幕（60 Hz）和一个额外的4K显示器（60 Hz）。

每个Thunderbolt 4端口都通过40GB/s接口连接，我们设法用一个外部固态硬盘获得超过2.5GB/s的传输率。外接显示器和扩展坞仍有一些问题（传输率限于USB 3.0速度），但这是由新的macOS Monterey造成的。

左侧。MagSafe 3, 2x USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4 (40 Gbps, USB-4, DisplayPort, Power Delivery), 3.5 mm耳机

右侧。SD卡读卡器，USB-C和Thunderbolt 4（40Gbps，USB-4，DisplayPort，Power Delivery），HDMI 2.0

SD卡阅读器

当我们从参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60 UHS-II）复制图片时，我们确定最大传输速率为121 MB/s。这里仍有改进的余地，因为竞争对手如戴尔XPS 15或联想的ThinkPad P1 G4管理更高的传输速率。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED (AV Pro V60)	224 MB/s +85%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y30017GE (AV PRO V60)	204 MB/s +69%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	121 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	93.2 MB/s -23%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 (AV Pro V60)	73.8 MB/s -39%

沟通

Apple'的MacBook Pro 16不支持最新的Wi-Fi 6E标准，这在高端笔记本电脑中越来越普遍。制造商列出的最大传输速度为1.2Gbps，这意味着它只支持80MHz的Wi-Fi连接。根据路由器的不同，可能会有轻微的差异（华硕ROG Rapture管理的传输速率比我们的参考路由器Netgear Nighthawk RAX120略好），但支持160 MHz的Windows竞争者在这方面肯定有优势。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1419 (1169^min - 1609^max) MBit/s +84%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1368 (669^min - 1440^max) MBit/s +77%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1076 (944^min - 1117^max) MBit/s +39%
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years)	998 MBit/s +29%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (405 - 1750, n=103)	787 MBit/s +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	772 (748^min - 792^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	689 (349^min - 730^max) MBit/s -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac	581 (533^min - 616^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average of class Multimedia (last 2 years)	1675 MBit/s +120%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1386 (1274^min - 1446^max) MBit/s +82%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1363 (1311^min - 1453^max) MBit/s +79%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650s	1319 (1015^min - 1489^max) MBit/s +74%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Broadcom 802.11ac	817 (806^min - 821^max) MBit/s +8%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (284 - 1414, n=103)	765 MBit/s +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	760 (404^min - 869^max) MBit/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax	730 (645^min - 824^max) MBit/s -4%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000; Asus ROG Rapture: Ø874 (522-938)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; Netgear Nighthawk: Ø759 (404-869)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; Asus ROG Rapture: Ø766 (698-785)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; Netgear Nighthawk: Ø772 (748-792)

网络摄像头

该缺口容纳了一个1080p的网络摄像头，光圈较宽（f/2.4）。与旧的720p型号相比，质量更好，M1 SoC的图像处理也有帮助，但如果你看一下iPhone的前置摄像头，还是会有点唏嘘。苹果手机和iPad.iPad的Center Stage功能也无法使用，Apple ，MacBook Pro也没有配备Face ID模块。

ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro: 11.2 ∆E min: 3.97 - max: 24.53 ∆E

辅料

Apple ，所有型号的MacBook Pro 16都配有一个140瓦的电源适配器和一条充电线（USB-C到MagSafe 3，两米）。除了一些服务手册和两张黑色的Apple 标志贴纸，盒子里没有任何附件。

维护

像往常一样，底板是由五角螺丝固定的，相当容易拆卸。你将不得不把盖子推到前面，当你想把它放回去时，这可能是一个棘手的问题。你可以清洁两个风扇，但也就这样了。据我们来自iFixit的同事说，电池现在更容易更换，而且端口也没有焊接。

担保

保修期只有一年。你可以再加两年，费用为399欧元（约457美元）。

输入设备 - 魔术键盘和触摸识别

键盘

Apple ，保留了其熟悉的标准剪刀键的键盘，新键盘的打字体验与旧键盘几乎没有区别。MBP 16.敲击键盘的声音只是稍微有点闷。该键盘也用于其他MacBook机型，仍然以非常精确和均匀的反馈而令人信服，但考虑到更厚的基础单元，我们希望看到更多的键程。这也是一个品味问题，你可以非常迅速和舒适地打字，但在这个价格段有更好和更舒适的键盘的设备。

制造商现在使用黑色作为按键之间的空间，这在以前的版本中曾经是机箱的颜色。旧型号的Touch Bar也被标准功能键所取代，与目前的MacBook Air相反，它的垂直高度与所有其他按键相同。Apple ，在键盘照明方面肯定仍然领先于竞争对手，它可以自动激活/停用，强度可以按非常精细的步骤调整。大多数竞争对手只提供两到三个亮度级别，而且往往没有传感器。

Touch-ID指纹扫描仪位于右上角的电源按钮内，一个环形物突出了它，但这只是一个视觉噱头。

触摸板

Apple 也仍然是TrackPad方面的基准，因为光标控制（包括手势）与操作系统的结合是完美无缺的。滑行能力非常好，而且有很多选项可以配置（比如用三个手指移动窗口）。

显示屏 - 液体视网膜XDR迷你LED

Apple ，14英寸和16英寸MacBook Pro机型的像素密度都达到了255 ppi。由于显示屏显然更大，分辨率也更高。Apple ，而不是IPS屏幕，现在使用Mini-LED面板。它可以管理极低的黑值和非常高的对比度，类似于OLED面板。然而，由于该技术，当明亮的内容显示在黑暗的背景上时，会出现明显的光晕效果。不过这只是一个小小的批评，因为主观的画面印象非常好。所有的内容都非常清晰明了，因为尽管分辨率很高，但macOS没有任何缩放问题，黑色是真正的黑色，这导致了极高的图像对比度。特别是HDR的内容看起来很好，而且视角的稳定性也很好。

像在较小的MacBook Pro 14 Apple，官方的亮度规格只适用于HDR图像。在APL为50的情况下（平均画面水平，明亮和黑暗内容的均匀分布），我们可以测量到高达1620尼特的峰值亮度，在完全白色的图像（至少是带有小黑边的16:9视频）中仍然非常好的1174尼特，所以我们可以确认Apple的说法。然而，这在大多数时候并没有真正的帮助，因为大多数日常的东西使用SDR内容，其中亮度再次被限制在500尼特多一点，这与前代产品相当。迷你LED面板有一个优势，因为它有卓越的对比度。只要有HDR图像的应用（例如Final Cut的预览窗口）需要更多的亮度，面板就会提供。

在15kHz左右的持续PWM闪烁是另一个问题，我们甚至可以在最大HDR亮度下检测到它。这个频率非常高，对大多数用户来说不是问题，但如果你对闪烁非常敏感，新MacBook Pro 16的面板就不适合你了。这种持续的闪烁也使人很难确定响应时间。根据我们的测量，它们是相当慢的，但你在实践中并没有真正注意到重影。看起来，Apple，动态刷新率高达120赫兹的专业运动技术有一定的帮助。例如，当你浏览操作系统时，你会注意到更平滑的过渡，但并不是所有Apple自己的应用程序都支持更高的刷新率。Safari浏览器就是这些应用之一，所以还不要指望更平滑的滚动。

凹槽和它旁边的区域（用于菜单项）基本上位于常规的16:10长宽比屏幕之上，并没有挡住面板的任何部分。凹槽看起来不是很吸引人，而且还可能存在一些功能问题，但是已经有工具可以将菜单栏涂黑，所以你永远不会看到凹槽。


493 cd/m²	487 cd/m²	497 cd/m²
500 cd/m²	514 cd/m²	494 cd/m²
494 cd/m²	501 cd/m²	496 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Liquid Retina XDR tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 514 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 497.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 514 cd/m²
Contrast: 25700:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27

	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Liquid Retina XDR, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M APPA044, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 LP160UQ1-SPB1, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED SDC414D, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 SDC4145, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Display			-1%	4%	3%	-19%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	99.1		85.7 -14%	99.9 1%	99.9 1%	66.9 -32%	99.3 0%
sRGB Coverage	100		99.4 -1%	100 0%	100 0%	97.1 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	88		98.9 12%	98.1 11%	95.3 8%	69 -22%
Response Times		275%	19%	30%	31%	90%	7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	42.8 ?(19.6, 23.2)	52.4 ?(23.9, 28.5) -22%	55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4) -29%	3.6 ?(2, 1.6) 92%	2.4 ?(1, 1.4) 94%	4.2 ?(2.6, 1.6) 90%	58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8) -36%
Response Time Black / White *	91.6 ?(76, 15.6)	34.9 ?(17.8, 17.1) 62%	31.2 ?(16.4, 14.8) 66%	2.8 ?(1.2, 1.6) 97%	2.4 ?(1.1, 1.3) 97%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) 89%	40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6) 56%
PWM Frequency	14880	131700 785%		59.5 ?(99) -100%	240.4 ?(52) -98%		14880 0%
Screen		-262%	-269%	-49%	-85%	-227%	35%
Brightness middle	514	519 1%	630 23%	362 -30%	379.6 -26%	353.4 -31%	489 -5%
Brightness	497	477 -4%	622 25%	367 -26%	380 -24%	340 -32%	479 -4%
Brightness Distribution	95	86 -9%	90 -5%	97 2%	95 0%	92 -3%	94 -1%
Black Level *	0.02	0.39 -1850%	0.41 -1950%	0.06 -200%		0.31 -1450%	0.01 50%
Contrast	25700	1331 -95%	1537 -94%	6033 -77%		1140 -96%	48900 90%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.4	2.28 -63%	2.2 -57%	2.1 -50%	5.15 -268%	2.17 -55%	0.8 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.8	6.54 -134%	5 -79%	4.1 -46%	7.79 -178%	5.69 -103%	1.3 54%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.3	0.9 61%	2.7 -17%	1.4 39%	2.6 -13%	3.4 -48%	1.1 52%
Gamma	2.27 ^97%	2145 ^0%	2.26 ^97%	2.18 ^101%	1.99 ^111%	2.2 ^100%	2.24 ^98%
CCT	6792 ^96%	6572 ^99%	6886 ^94%	6608 ^98%	6166 ^105%	6830 ^95%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		0.86	1	2.5	3.1	1.05
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		78
Total Average (Program / Settings)		7% / -115%	-84% / -163%	-5% / -21%	-17% / -34%	-52% / -130%	14% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计进行的分析表明，新的MBP 16的面板校准与14英寸设备相比并不出色。 14英寸设备开箱即用。色温略微过冷，灰度中存在轻微的偏蓝。不幸的是，我们无法用我们的设备校准该面板。虽然颜色以及灰度的DeltaE-2000平均偏差都已经小于3，所以这是在一个非常高的水平上的呻吟，对图片/视频编辑没有任何限制。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
91.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 76 ms rise
91.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 15.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 100 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 19.6 ms rise
42.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 23.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

14880 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

MacBook Pro 16确实有一个光亮的屏幕表面，但它不像其他许多有光亮显示屏或触摸屏的笔记本电脑那样反光。只要你避免反射，即使在较亮的环境中，你仍然可以相当舒适地在户外工作，但该面板显然会从更高的亮度水平中受益。如果你看到Apple's specs并希望改善户外能力，你会在这方面感到失望。

性能 - 带有10/16个核心的M1 Pro

不同于较小的MacBook Pro 14，较大的16英寸机型总是以完整版本的M1 Pro SoC发货，所以你得到10个CPU核心（2个效率核心和8个性能核心）与16个GPU核心的组合。如果你选择类似的组件，这两个型号的价格差异只有230欧元（约263美元）。

SoC	CPU Cores	GPU Cores	RAM	附加价格
M1 Pro	2个效率核心和8个性能核心	16	16或32 GB
M1 Max	2个效率核心和8个性能核心	24	32或64GB	230欧元(~263美元)
M1 Max	2个效率核心和8个性能核心	32	32或64GB	410欧元(~469美元)

Apple 还提供两个版本的新M1 Max芯片（有24或32个GPU核心）作为可选升级。CPU性能将基本保持不变；一些应用程序可能从更多的内存中受益。你可以用M1 Pro升级到32GB内存，用M1 Max一路升级到64GB。

处理器 - 具有10个核心的M1 Pro

M1 Pro由两个效率集群（两个核心，最高2,064 MHz）与两个性能集群相结合，每个集群有4个核心（最高3.2 GHz）。核心的基本架构与去年的Apple M1 SoC没有区别，例如MacBook Air和MacBook Pro 13使用的就是这种系统。这意味着单核性能也具有可比性，可选的M1 Max芯片也是如此。Apple ，在这方面可以跟上AMD和英特尔的现代移动处理器，但效率更高（~7 W封装和4 W核心与~20 W @英特尔和~15 W @AMD）。

在MacBook Pro 16上原生运行的Cinebench R23 Multi测试，其结果是封装功耗为~30W，核心功耗为~27W。这与目前的AMD Ryzen 7 5800U(Zen 3，8个核心，16个线程)，但性能较低(~20%)，与较小的8核M1 Pro芯片。AMD和英特尔都有在45W领域性能更强的移动CPU，但它们的耗电量也更大。新款MacBook Pro 16的一个主要优势是性能稳定，无论是在持续工作负荷下还是在电池电量下都是如此。更多的CPU基准测试可在这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro: Ø1681 (1674.55-1690.12)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; macOS 10.15.1: Ø1407 (1386-1435)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H; Win 10: Ø1296 (1268.87-1362.31)

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H: Ø1803 (1759.48-1988.07)

Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H; Ultra Performance: Ø1663 (1589.38-2024.19)

Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1625 (1566.05-2009.95)

HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1806 (1765.46-1841.11)

Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1867 (1776.59-1876.96)

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Multimedia	82.9 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry ^-8! Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	79.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro ^-5! Apple M1 Pro	76.7 pt
Average Apple M1 Pro ^-5!	76.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	75.1 pt
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	73.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) ^-2! Intel Core i7-11800H	72.8 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	67.9 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	54.9 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)	14237 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	12370 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	12370 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	12197 (11396.1^min - 12197.5^max) Points -1%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	12166 (11410^min - 12166.4^max) Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	11935 Points -4%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	10531 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9581 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	8758 Points -29%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	8747 (8681.12^min - 8746.74^max) Points -29%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)	1716 Points +12%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1569 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	1552 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	1534 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	1534 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1531 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	1513 Points -1%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	1498 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	1140 Points -26%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)	5373 Points +97%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	4706 Points +73%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	4663 Points +71%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	4660 Points +71%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	3848 Points +41%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	3422 Points +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	3057 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	2721 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	2721 Points 0%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)	647 Points +65%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	610 Points +55%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	607 Points +54%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	582 Points +48%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	581 Points +48%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	453 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	442 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	393 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	393 Points 0%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2327 Points +38%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	2024 Points +20%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	2010 Points +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	1988 (1759.48^min - 1988.07^max) Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	1877 (1776.59^min - 1876.96^max) Points +11%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1841 (1765.46^min - 1841.11^max) Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	1690 (1675^min - 1690^max) Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	1690 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	1435 (1401^min - 1435^max) Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	1362 (1268.87^min - 1362.31^max) Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1320 (1307^min - 1320^max) Points -22%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points +20%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	236 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	233 Points +11%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	228 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	227 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	210 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	209 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	209 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	184 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	184 Points -12%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	343 Seconds * -87%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	298 Seconds * -63%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)	264 Seconds * -44%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	259 Seconds * -41%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	257 Seconds * -40%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	254 Seconds * -39%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	183.3 Seconds *
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	183.3 Seconds * -0%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)	57526 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	53597 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	50552 MIPS
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	50050 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	42570 MIPS
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	39455 MIPS

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	5773 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	5762 MIPS
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)	5637 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	5480 MIPS
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	5427 MIPS
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	4837 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	12499 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	12499 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)	11417 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9942 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	9451 Points -24%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	8164 Points -35%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	7286 Points -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	7109 Points -43%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	1769 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro	1768 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro ()	1768 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)	1761 Points 0%
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	1702 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	1659 Points -6%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	1540 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	1115 Points -37%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)	15.7 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	15 fps
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	14.5 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	14.4 fps
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	12.4 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	10.6 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	58.9 s *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	16.5 s *
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	48.6 s *
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)	47.9 s *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	47.5 s *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	45.9 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	45.8 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	0.6904 sec *
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H	0.661 sec *
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED Intel Core i7-11800H	0.567 sec *
HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 Intel Core i9-11950H	0.551 sec *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H	0.55 sec *
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 Intel Core i7-11850H	0.541 sec *
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)	0.4805 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1690 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

85.5 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.5 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

209 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

新的MacBook Pro 16是一台非常快的多媒体笔记本电脑，所有任务的执行都非常快，没有明显的延迟。由于Rosetta 2，你也可以使用英特尔应用程序，而且效果很好，但当你使用Photoshop或Premiere Pro等复杂的应用程序时，你会注意到性能上的差异，M1版本要快得多。我们包括了PugetBench的结果，但它们并不具有真正的代表性，因为它们只在模拟的英特尔版本的Adobe应用程序中运行。

跨平台基准测试CrossMark显示，配备M1 Pro的MacBook Pro 16比小型的MacBook Pro 14的优势，但ThinkPad P1 G4配有酷睿i7和GeForce RTX 3070更快。这显然取决于你使用的软件，如果你能利用ProRes，例如，配备M1芯片的MacBooks将有巨大优势。

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Average of class Multimedia (67 - 294, n=8, last 2 years)	176.9 fps +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	163 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	163 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	133 fps -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	48 fps -71%

Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 68, n=8, last 2 years)	46.4 fps +72%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	39 fps +44%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	27 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	27 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	21 fps -22%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)	1702 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1644 Points +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	1556 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	1556 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1490 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	940 Points -40%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)	1622 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1613 Points +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	1342 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	1342 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1305 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	937 Points -30%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	2054 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	2054 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1915 Points -7%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)	1897 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1726 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	971 Points -53%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1507 Points +43%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)	1461 Points +38%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	1055 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	1055 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	1044 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	860 Points -18%

Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Average of class Multimedia (737 - 1442, n=12, last 2 years)	1115 Points +61%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	971 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	711 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	694 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	694 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	667 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	667 Points -4%

Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Average of class Multimedia (72.7 - 146.8, n=12, last 2 years)	108.4 Points +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	107.6 Points +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	78.8 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	78.8 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	76 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	75.9 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	66.8 Points -15%

Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Average of class Multimedia (63.1 - 165, n=12, last 2 years)	127.1 Points +82%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	88.6 Points +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	69.7 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	69.7 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	68.5 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.3 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	59.5 Points -15%

Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	105.5 Points +53%
Average of class Multimedia (81.8 - 123.3, n=12, last 2 years)	96 Points +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.8 Points +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	73.9 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	69.1 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	69.1 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	64.8 Points -6%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	837 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (413 - 1118, n=5, last 2 years)	798 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	756 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	748 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	748 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	658 Points -12%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9
Average of class Multimedia (28 - 99.8, n=4, last 2 years)	70.7 Points +74%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	58.3 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	53.3 Points +31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	40.7 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	40.7 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	38.9 Points -4%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	177.7 Points +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	145 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	145 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	117 Points -19%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	104 Points -28%
Average of class Multimedia (69.6 - 134.7, n=4, last 2 years)	103.4 Points -29%

Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	57.2 Points +70%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4-20Y5CTO1WW (3050 Ti) GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	43.7 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia (20.7 - 61.5, n=4, last 2 years)	38 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	33.7 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	33.7 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512	31.6 Points -6%

存储设备

Apple ，新的MacBook Pro机型采用更快的PCIe 4.0存储。基本型号配备的是512GB固态硬盘；我们的测试装置配备的是可选的1TB硬盘。读取性能与较小的固态硬盘相似，但1TB型号在写入性能方面更快。总而言之，传输率非常好，超过5GB/s。在AmorphousDiskMark 3.1中，我们也看到非常好的结果。只有4K写入结果与高端PCIe固态硬盘相比相当低。Apple ，提供高达8TB的内部固态硬盘存储，但价格是天文数字（从512GB的固态硬盘跳到8TB是2760欧元（约3158美元））。更多的SSD基准数据列在这里.

Drive Performance Rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple SSD AP1024R	99 pt
Average Apple SSD AP1024R	99 pt
Average of class Multimedia	88.8 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	87.9 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171	50 pt

Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	5448 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple SSD AP1024R	5334 MB/s
Average Apple SSD AP1024R ()	5334 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (2877 - 5666, n=9, last 2 years)	4638 MB/s -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171	2788 MB/s -48%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple SSD AP1024R	5888 MB/s
Average Apple SSD AP1024R ()	5888 MB/s 0%
Average of class Multimedia (2993 - 8271, n=9, last 2 years)	5440 MB/s -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple SSD AP0512	4463 MB/s -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Apple SSD AP1024 7171	2880 MB/s -51%

GPU性能

与较小的MBP 14 Apple ，MBP 16只配备了最快的M1 Pro SoC，它提供10个CPU内核和16个GPU内核。与14核GPU相比，其优势仅有8-12%，这取决于基准测试，所以并不很大。Nvidia的RTX 3050 Ti在戴尔XPS 15明显更快，而在性能方面与Apple iGPU最接近的对手是专用的GeForce GTX 1650来自Nvidia。然而，M1 iGPU的效率更高，需要的电力更少。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | GFXBench

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 ^-5! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	100 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	89.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia	79.7 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	62.4 pt
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	62.4 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	55.7 pt
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED ^-5! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	53.3 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M ^-4! AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	39.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) ^-5! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	10.5 pt

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	15730 Points +52%
Average of class Multimedia (1867 - 31403, n=40, last 2 years)	12942 Points +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	10352 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	10352 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9267 Points -10%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	14727 Points +42%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	10351 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	10351 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	9089 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia (1854 - 20732, n=15, last 2 years)	8797 Points -15%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11850H	109988 Points +190%
Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	58601 Points +55%
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 120093, n=99, last 2 years)	57318 Points +51%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	51568 Points +36%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	37867 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	37867 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	35173 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	11499 Points -70%
Metal Score
Average of class Multimedia (34398 - 100376, n=9, last 2 years)	63778 Points +51%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	58191 Points +38%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	42115 Points
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	42115 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	37319 Points -11%

GFXBench
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	636 fps +46%
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 950, n=11, last 2 years)	555 fps +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	436 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	436 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	394 fps -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	254 fps -42%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max	240 fps +45%
Average of class Multimedia (62.8 - 446, n=11, last 2 years)	232 fps +40%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro	166 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	166 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core	147 fps -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, Intel Core i9-9880H	94.7 fps -43%

游戏性能

与Windows笔记本电脑相比，MacBook Pro 16的游戏能力要有限得多，因为没有那么多游戏。只有一些游戏对macOS有原生支持，一些游戏可以模拟或通过CrossWare等附加软件运行（如通过Steam的TheWitcher 3或GTA V），但MacBook就是不属于游戏设备。显然，你也可以利用Apple"自己的街机游戏集 "的优势。

我们进行的游戏基准测试显示，新的MacBook Pro 16比MBP 14稍有优势。MBP 14配备14核GPU和旧的MacBook Pro 16配备专用的Radeon Pro 5500M.

Shadow of the Tomb Raider | Total War: Three Kingdoms

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	127 (93^min) fps +102%
Average of class Multimedia (43 - 150, n=10, last 2 years)	85.2 fps +35%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	63 (48^min) fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	63 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	58 (48^min) fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	58 fps -8%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	124 (92^min) fps +118%
Average of class Multimedia (38 - 146, n=12, last 2 years)	87.3 fps +53%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	57 (45^min) fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	57 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	54 (46^min) fps -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	53 fps -7%
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	115 (89^min) fps +130%
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 153, n=13, last 2 years)	83.5 fps +67%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	50 (37^min) fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	50 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	46 (38^min) fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	46 fps -8%

Total War: Three Kingdoms
1920x1080 Medium (incl textures)
Average of class Multimedia (52 - 170, n=8, last 2 years)	107.5 fps +54%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	69.6 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	69.6 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	64.1 (55^min) fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	58 fps -17%
1920x1080 High (incl textures)
Average of class Multimedia (33 - 113, n=8, last 2 years)	69.8 fps +59%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	43.8 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	43.8 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	40.5 (34^min) fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	36 fps -18%
1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Average of class Multimedia (24 - 84, n=8, last 2 years)	51.5 fps +62%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	31.8 fps
Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU ()	31.8 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Intel Core i9-9880H, AMD Radeon Pro 5500M	29.7 (24^min) fps -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU	27 fps -15%

	low	med.	high	ultra
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016)			54.2	43.1
Civilization VI (2016)			45.5	45.5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)		63	57	50
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019)	114	69.6	43.8	31.8
Borderlands 3 (2019)	56.6	48	34.8	26.2

排放 - MBP 16非常安静

系统噪音

与14英寸机型相比，MacBook Pro 16的两个风扇要安静得多。14英寸机型即使在最大负荷的情况下，旋转速度也不会超过3000转/分钟，这导致了约37分贝（A）。如果你只对处理器或显卡施加压力，你几乎听不到超过27 dB(A)的声音（在游戏期间也是如此），因此，尽管性能很高，但该设备在正常环境下根本听不到。你可以通过工具将风扇手动设置到最大速度（约49 dB(A)），但我们在测试中从未达到这个水平。我们没有注意到任何电子噪音（如线圈啸叫）。

Noise Level

Idle		24.7 / 24.7 / 24.7 dB(A)
Load		26.1 / 37.4 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.7 dB(A)

	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, M1 Pro, Apple SSD AP1024R	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M Radeon Pro 5500M, i9-9880H, Apple SSD AP1024 7171	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11850H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB	Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
Noise		-29%	-13%	-4%	-15%	-18%	-7%
off / environment *	24.7	29.8 -21%	23.8 4%	23.8 4%	23.5 5%	25.1 -2%	24.8 -0%
Idle Minimum *	24.7	29.9 -21%	23.8 4%	23.8 4%	25.3 -2%	25.3 -2%	24.8 -0%
Idle Average *	24.7	29.9 -21%	23.8 4%	23.8 4%	25.3 -2%	25.3 -2%	24.8 -0%
Idle Maximum *	24.7	29.9 -21%	28.3 -15%	23.8 4%	25.3 -2%	25.3 -2%	24.8 -0%
Load Average *	26.1	43 -65%	38.6 -48%	36 -38%	41.2 -58%	42 -61%	27.8 -7%
Load Maximum *	37.4	46.1 -23%	47.4 -27%	38.2 -2%	49.4 -32%	51.6 -38%	49.5 -32%
Witcher 3 ultra *		45.4	47.4	36	49.4	45.6	27.8

* ... smaller is better

温度

冷却系统在M1 Pro上没有问题，尽管有安静的风扇，但在负载下表面温度并不高。特别是键盘比较小的MBP 14保持较低的温度。在大多数日常工作中，你几乎不会注意到任何升温，M1 Pro的高效架构在这方面肯定会得到回报，因为Windows的竞争对手会达到明显的高温度。在压力测试中，M1 Pro的性能也很稳定，这对于强大的Windows笔记本电脑来说是不可能的事。

Max. Load

Idle


41 °C	41 °C	40 °C
36 °C	37 °C	33 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 35 °C


39 °C	39 °C	39 °C
35 °C	37 °C	35 °C
31 °C	32 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 35.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 64 MAX

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.2 °C / -0.4 F).

发言人

新款MacBook Pro 16中的扬声器与旧款中已经很出色的声音系统相比有所改进。旧型号甚至性能略好于MacBook Pro 14在频率图上的表现。从主观上讲，考虑到机箱的尺寸，声音非常好，由于有四个低音单元，甚至有一些低音来自于薄薄的机箱。具有6个扬声器的音响系统也支持3D音频，而且效果出奇地好。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple 还改进了集成的耳机插孔，它现在支持阻抗更高的耳机，但我们的测量清楚地表明，在更高的音量下有失真现象。这意味着它不能取代高质量的外部放大器，但它现在支持高阻抗的耳机。

能源管理--M1 Pro非常高效

消耗功率

我们的空闲测量结果显示，与之前使用SDR内容的MacBook Pro 16类似，但当你消耗HDR内容时，会出现高达30W的峰值。我们确定负载下的平均功率略高于50W，在压力测试中高达90W，这意味着MBP 16再次比Windows的竞争对手高效得多。对于MBP 16的基本型号来说，140W的电源适配器几乎太强大了，我们有点惊讶Apple ，没有省钱，只用96W的电源适配器发货。这将不支持快速充电，但这也是较小的MBP 14的基本型号的情况。较小的MBP 14的基本型号也是如此，该型号默认使用67瓦的电源。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.23 / 3.2 Watt
Idle	5 / 15.1 / 15.5 Watt
Load	54 / 90 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, Apple SSD AP1024 7171, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 16.00	Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM981a MZVLB2T0HALB, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20	Average Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-9%	-58%	-17%	-87%	-145%	24%	0%	-19%
Idle Minimum *	5	3.7 26%	8.1 -62%	7.6 -52%	11 -120%	19.5 -290%	2.9 42%	5 ?() -0%	7.27 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=96, last 2 years) -45%
Idle Average *	15.1	12.1 20%	20.2 -34%	9.9 34%	18.8 -25%	23.3 -54%	11.6 23%	15.1 ?() -0%	11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=96, last 2 years) 22%
Idle Maximum *	15.5	17 -10%	21.9 -41%	10.8 30%	31.7 -105%	40.1 -159%	11.9 23%	15.5 ?() -0%	14.5 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=96, last 2 years) 6%
Load Average *	54	91.5 -69%	88.2 -63%	81 -50%	105.2 -95%	98.9 -83%	49.5 8%	54 ?() -0%	77.6 ?(14.3 - 147, n=95, last 2 years) -44%
Load Maximum *	90	102.3 -14%	170.6 -90%	131 -46%	171.8 -91%	214 -138%	68.5 24%	90 ?() -0%	120.9 ?(47.7 - 247, n=95, last 2 years) -34%
Witcher 3 ultra *		103	149	76.2	148	174	58.2

* ... smaller is better

当我们看一下内部消耗时，M1 Pro也是非常高效的（通过powermetrics），在基准测试开始时没有节流或涡轮增压峰值。

电池运行时间

16英寸MacBook Pro的电池容量为99.6Wh，因此与较小的MBP 14（69.9Wh）相比要高得多，在我们的测试中，电池运行时间也更好。我们的Wi-Fi测试在调整亮度为150尼特的情况下运行了近17个小时，在最大SDR亮度下仍有8小时左右。与以前的macOS版本相反，我们在使用全屏模式时没有看到差异。在我们采用M1 Max SoC的MBP 16（目前也在评测中）的测试装置上，一个最大亮度的HDR视频运行了约4.5小时，这比较小的MBP 14的4小时要长一些。另一方面，150尼特的标准视频可运行约17.5小时。

140瓦的电源适配器支持快速充电，30分钟后可获得50%的容量。你也可以通过USB-C端口为MBP 16充电，但它们不支持快速充电。

我们没有注意到电池供电时CPU或GPU的性能下降。与Windows竞争产品相比，这是MacBook Pro 16的又一优势，在Windows竞争产品中，强大的系统在电池供电时总是会降低性能（尤其是dGPU）。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Fullscreen)		16h 56min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		17h 28min

	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro M1 Pro, M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M i9-9880H, Radeon Pro 5500M, 99.8 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4S0KS00 i7-11850H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9510 11800H RTX 3050 Ti OLED i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	HP ZBook Studio 15 G8 i9-11950H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-37%	-59%	-50%	-64%	-65%	-17%	-38%
H.264	1048	580 -45%	429 -59%	624 -40%			900 -14%	714 ?(319 - 1481, n=54, last 2 years) -32%
WiFi v1.3	1016	718 -29%	417 -59%	420 -59%	369 -64%	353 -65%	816 -20%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) -44%
Witcher 3 ultra		54						81.8 ?(57 - 104, n=5, last 2 years)
Load		58	74	106	106		69	95.7 ?(39 - 212, n=76, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle					774			907 ?(506 - 1506, n=24, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高质量和坚固的底盘

+ 显示效果好，色彩准确

+ 极高的HDR亮度

+ 非常安静的风扇

+ 非常高的系统性能

+ 效率极高的M1 Pro SoC

+ 电池运行时间长

+ 笔记本电脑上最好的扬声器系统

+ 高达64GB内存和8TB SSD

Cons

- 凹槽（看起来并不好看，而且有一些功能问题

- 特别提款权的亮度限制在500尼特

- 持续的PWM闪动和缓慢的响应时间

- 既没有HDMI 2.1、Wi-Fi 6E或Wi-Fi 6 160 MHz，也没有蓝牙5.2

- 只有1年的保修期

- 没有维护选项

- 内存和固态硬盘的升级成本非常高

结论 - 新设计在MacBook Pro 16上效果更好

与较小的14英寸机型相比，新的MacBook Pro 16给人留下的整体印象略好。较小的14英寸机型.笨重的机箱设计并不十分明显，M1 Pro的完整版更有说服力。冷却解决方案也更安静，在大多数任务中，你几乎听不到更多安静的杂音。Apple"自己的处理器的高效率提高了几个方面。除了安静的风扇之外，它还提供了良好的性能数据，而且性能非常稳定，无论是在主电源还是电池电源上。其他配有专用GPU的多媒体笔记本电脑在这些方面无法与新的MBP 16相提并论。

当我们谈及屏幕时，我们几乎可以重复我们对MBP 14的评价。图像质量非常好，尤其是HDR内容。标准SDR内容的500尼特的限制应该由Apple ，我们会在户外欣赏到更高的亮度值。持续的PWM闪烁也会给一些用户带来问题。

采用Mini-LED技术的新型液体视网膜XDR显示屏并不完美，但其画质令人惊叹，尤其是HDR内容。与较小的14英寸机型相比，扬声器的效果也更好一些。

连接标准也没有真正满足高端期望，因为Wi-Fi模块、HDMI端口以及读卡器都有改进的余地。此外，几乎没有任何维护选项，存储和内存升级也非常昂贵。然而，好在Apple ，仍然提供那么多的内部存储（高达8TB）。

新款MacBook Pro 16是一款令人印象深刻的多媒体笔记本电脑，绝对是内容创作者的最佳设备之一，特别是当他们在处理HDR内容时。尽管性能很高，但该设备保持非常安静和凉爽，这在目前的同类Windows笔记本电脑上是不可能的。

凭借高性能和HDR面板，新MacBook Pro 16主要是为内容创作者设计的，如果他们需要更多的内存和/或更多的GPU性能，他们可能会从升级到可选的M1 Max芯片中受益。如果你不确定你是否需要升级，你可能用M1 Pro就可以了。与MBP 14不同，更大的MBP 16不提供较慢的M1 Pro版本，因此更容易选择适合你的SKU。

如果你只是想买一台高端多媒体笔记本电脑，拥有出色的屏幕、长的电池运行时间和出色的扬声器，并且愿意支付高价，那么MacBook Pro 16也是一个好选择。然而，你应该知道，MacBook Pro不是游戏笔记本电脑，因为macOS的大片游戏不多。在这种情况下，我们会推荐一个Windows设备来代替它（如戴尔XPS 15或联想ThinkPad X1 Extreme G4)，因为有更多的游戏可用。其他领域（如CAD、工程）也取决于软件支持。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

新款MacBook Pro 16的供应目前是有限的。最好的选择是在Apple"零售店 "提货，在那里你可以以2699美元的价格买到我们的测试设备和1TB SDD，或者以2499美元买到512GB SSD存储的基本型号。

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro - 2021-11-13 11/13/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

90 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

100%

Connectivity

63 / 80 → 79%

Weight

62 / 20-72 → 81%

Battery

91 / 95 → 96%

Display

93%

Games Performance

91 / 90 → 100%

Application Performance

96 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

93%

Noise

97 / 95 → 100%

Audio

98%

Camera

37 / 85 → 43%

Average

85%

93%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1620 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 391930 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro回顾--最适合内容创作者的多媒体笔记本电脑？

Andreas Osthoff, 2021-11-14 (Update: 2021-11-14)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro回顾--最适合内容创作者的多媒体笔记本电脑？

Comparison of potential competitors

外壳 - 新款MacBook Pro 16更显笨重

Size comparison

连接性 - MagSafe回来了

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

辅料

维护

担保

输入设备 - 魔术键盘和触摸识别

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 - 液体视网膜XDR迷你LED

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 带有10/16个核心的M1 Pro

处理器 - 具有10个核心的M1 Pro

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

存储设备

GPU性能

游戏性能

排放 - MBP 16非常安静

系统噪音

温度

发言人

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2019 i9 5500M audio analysis

能源管理--M1 Pro非常高效

消耗功率

电池运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 新设计在MacBook Pro 16上效果更好

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare