Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023评论。M2 Pro在小型MacBook Pro中被放慢了速度

现在有了快速的WLAN。 Apple 已经升级了MacBook Pro 14,新的M2 Pro提供了更大的性能,快速WLAN终于得到了支持。总的来说,MBP 14是一台优秀的机器,但 ,也给小型MacBook Pro中的M2 Pro踩了一些刹车。Apple
Apple ARM MacBook Thunderbolt

在去年秋天推迟发布后,Apple ,现在终于提出了MacBook Pro机型的升级版。当然,新机型的核心是Apple 自己的M2 Pro和M2 Max SoC,据说在处理器和显卡方面都有明显的性能提升。同时,现在支持快速的6GHz WLAN网络(Wi-Fi 6E),而且,据Apple ,电池运行时间比以前更好。价格也增加了约150美元。

我们的评测设备是配备快速M2 Pro(12个CPU内核和19个GPU内核)的MacBook Pro 14,它有16GB内存和1TB SSD,售价为2499.00美元。我们的模型甚至安装了32GB内存和2TB固态硬盘,这就是为什么这里的价格上升到3299.00美元。由于Apple ,在2021年的模型中只引入了基本设计,外壳和输入设备都没有变化。更多信息,请参考我们之前的评论:

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro (MacBook Pro 14 2023 Series)
Processor
Apple M2 Pro 12 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 34 W PL2 / Short Burst
Graphics adapter
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Core: 1400 MHz
Memory
32 GB 
, LPDDR5-6400, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
14.20 inch 16:10, 3024 x 1964 pixel, Mini-LED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP2048Z, 2048 GB 
, 1970 GB free
Connections
3 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 3 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15.5 x 312.6 x 221.2
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple macOS 13 Ventura
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 Speakers, 3D Audio, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 96W PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.6 kg, Power Supply: 274 g
Price
3919 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
93.9 %
03/2023
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
91.9 %
06/2022
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
1.4 kg15.6 mm13.30"2560x1600
92.1 %
04/2022
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
87.7 %
12/2022
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1.5 kg18 mm14.50"3072x1920
89 %
03/2022
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.8 kg19 mm14.40"2400x1600
89.4 %
05/2022
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.8 mm14.00"2560x1440
88.8 %
10/2022
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
1.3 kg16.6 mm14.00"2880x1800

案例 -Apple 不做任何改变

关于案例,我们可以长话短说,因为从那时起就没有变化了。2021年模型以来没有任何变化。铝制外壳仍然具有极高的质量,但外壳的形状使14英寸机型(特别是)看起来非常笨重,尽管它与竞争对手的锥形单元直接相比并不高。根据不同的位置,在打字时,凸起的前缘可能被证明是有问题的,因为边缘很快就会压到手腕。MacBook Pro 14再次有银色 太空灰 两种颜色可供选择,这两个版本对灰尘都不是特别敏感。

唯一的视觉变化涉及MagSafe电缆,连接器现在的颜色与外壳相同。但电缆本身仍然是白色的,即使是太空 版本。

尺寸比较

325 mm 221 mm 18 mm 1.5 kg323 mm 228 mm 19 mm 1.8 kg319.7 mm 220 mm 16.8 mm 1.8 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg308.8 mm 215 mm 16.6 mm 1.3 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 15.6 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备--MacBook Pro现在配备了HDMI 2.1

连接方面也只有很小的变化--HMDI输出现在支持HDMI 2.1,而不是2.0。Apple ,甚至在这里有点超出标准,允许用户连接4K显示器,频率高达240 Hz(8K为60 Hz)。对于M2 Pro,最多可以连接两个外部显示器与集成显示器(2个6K 60 Hz通过Thunderbolt或1个6K 60 Hz通过Thunderbolt和1个4K 144 Hz通过HDMI)。对于M2 Max,最多可以连接四个外部显示器。

左边:MagSafe,2个USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,DisplayPort ALT模式1.4,Power Delivery),3.5mm音频。
左边:MagSafe,2个USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40Gbps,DisplayPort ALT模式1.4,Power Delivery),3.5mm音频。
右边:读卡器,USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40Gbit/s,DisplayPort-ALT模式1.4,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.1
右边:读卡器,USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4(40Gbit/s,DisplayPort-ALT模式1.4,Power Delivery),HDMI 2.1

SD卡阅读器

根据我们的测量,现在读卡器在复制时速度稍快,在使用我们的Angelbird AV Pro V60参考卡时,传输速度达到181 MB/s。根据AmorphousDiskMark,最大读取速度为208MB/s。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)
181 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core (AV PRO V60)
122 MB/s -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
121 MB/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia
  (17.6 - 205, n=63, last 2 years)
91.6 MB/s -49%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
57.8 MB/s -68%

沟通

2021年的MacBook Pro机型的一个缺点是WLAN连接相对较慢,因为只支持80MHz的连接。现在新的2023型号除了蓝牙5.3之外,终于支持Wi-Fi 6E,我们也能够连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络,没有问题。传输速率是我们迄今为止看到的最好的之一,所以新的MacBook Pro 14的速度是它的两倍多。前代产品(只要使用合适的路由器)。

Networking
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1741 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1777 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AX12
689 (min: 349) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 receive AX12
730 (min: 645) MBit/s ∼47%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AX12
772 (min: 748) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AX12
760 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
874 (min: 522) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
766 (min: 698) MBit/s ∼53%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 receive AXE11000
828 (min: 753) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
797 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼55%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1628 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1718 (min: 841) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1534 (min: 1271) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1454 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
iperf3 transmit AX12
1446 (min: 662) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
1293 (min: 1024) MBit/s ∼84%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AX12
1049 (min: 964) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AX12
1537 (min: 1431) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1570 (min: 1446) MBit/s ∼91%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1458 (min: 1294) MBit/s ∼100%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1777 (1685-1813)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1741 (1650-1785)

网络摄像头

室内,照明良好
室内,光线好,细节少,无噪音

Apple 继续安装其著名的1080p网络摄像头,但由于M2 Pro改进了图像处理,在某些情况下记录的质量略有提高。然而,遗憾的是,MacBooks仍然不支持Face ID或Center Stage。

ColorChecker
12.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro: 8.97 ∆E min: 4.65 - max: 17.31 ∆E

维护

维修选择仍然非常有限。最终,只有两个风扇可以被清洗。所有部件都是焊接的,既不能升级,也不能单独更换(在有缺陷的情况下)。与之相比前代产品芯片,散热器变得更小了。

内部布局(1TB型号)
内部布局(1TB型号)
比以前更小的散热器
比以前更小的散热器

担保

Apple 继续提供MacBook Pro 14 2023的一年保修,但在德国,当然适用24个月的法定保修。这在其他国家可能有所不同,所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

可以选择通过Apple Care+延长保修期。例如,在美国,买家可以选择99.99美元/年的年度保险(无限期,直到取消)或279.00美元的三年保险。这些价格在其他国家和其他货币也可能有所不同。

输入设备 - 良好的键盘,完美的触控板

至于输入设备,我们也参考了我们对上一代产品。键盘提供了良好的打字感觉,但与高端商务笔记本电脑相比,这里还有改进的余地。另一方面,Apple ,仍然提供最好的键盘背光,它由一个传感器自动调节,效果非常好。没有任何Windows笔记本电脑能与之媲美。

大尺寸触控板在功能和操作方面继续设定标准,因为在macOS中的实现也很出色。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光灯
键盘背光灯

显示 - 迷你LED面板,120赫兹

子像素矩阵
子像素矩阵

迷你LED面板也没有变化,但这也不是什么问题。主观的画质简直是出类拔萃,由于采用了120赫兹,移动图像显示得非常流畅。此外,Apple ,在实现HDR方面,显然是先驱者。虽然你通常必须在Windows设备上手动激活HDR模式,但它在这里自动工作。例如,只要一个相应的YouTube视频开始,面板就会从更高的亮度中受益。

在正常的SDR模式下,屏幕中心的亮度正好是500cd/m²,所以Apple ,对其进行了非常好的校准。迷你LED面板的黑度只有0.02,这导致了极高的对比度。在实践中,亮度和色温的自动调节是非常实用的。显示屏上方的缺口仍然不是特别漂亮,但从功能上看,这里没有更多的问题,而且缺口旁边的显示区域是叠加在正常的16:10上的,所以与其他16:10面板相比,你有更多的空间来容纳菜单元素。

最大HDR亮度
最大HDR亮度

在我们批评Apple ,因为在上一个型号的技术数据中只规定了HDR亮度,现在这个问题已经得到了纠正。HDR亮度仍然规定为1,600 cd/m²或全屏图像的1,000 cd/m²。我们在新的MacBook Pro 14 2023上测得的最大亮度为1481 cd/m²,在几乎完全白色的图像上测得的亮度为1082 cd/m²。

虽然Apple"的技术可以防止背光出血或光晕,但在有明亮物体的黑暗背景上,你仍然可以看到明显的绽放,例如鼠标指针。在明亮的物体周围会出现一个小的亮云。

482
cd/m²
497
cd/m²
490
cd/m²
488
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
494
cd/m²
471
cd/m²
491
cd/m²
486
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 500 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 488.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 500 cd/m²
Contrast: 25000:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
MNE507ZA1-1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
LQ144P1JX01, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.40
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
TL140BDXP02-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
MNE007ZA1-1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Display
0%
0%
-34%
-19%
-2%
-25%
Display P3 Coverage
99.2
99.3
0%
98.8
0%
65.7
-34%
80.6
-19%
97.2
-2%
74.1
-25%
sRGB Coverage
100
92.1
99.9
99.9
97.4
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
87.9
67.7
78.5
85.7
75.3
Response Times
-40%
223%
9%
-41%
47%
28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.2 ?(12.8, 22.4)
58.4 ?(27.6, 30.8)
-66%
42 ?(19.9, 22.1)
-19%
35 ?(16.4, 18.6)
1%
58.4 ?(26.8, 31.6)
-66%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
52%
31.5 ?(14, 17.5)
11%
Response Time Black / White *
26.4 ?(11.2, 15.2)
40.4 ?(20.8, 19.6)
-53%
27.8 ?(14.1, 13.7)
-5%
22 ?(11.6, 10.4)
17%
24 ?(8.4, 15.6)
9%
15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8)
42%
14.5 ?(4.7, 9.8)
45%
PWM Frequency
14880 ?(100, 500)
14880
0%
117780 ?(56)
692%
5000 ?(98)
-66%
Screen
33%
-191%
-171%
-183%
-250%
-234%
Brightness middle
500
489
-2%
514
3%
430
-14%
497
-1%
354
-29%
421
-16%
Brightness
489
479
-2%
497
2%
408
-17%
491
0%
328
-33%
416
-15%
Brightness Distribution
94
94
0%
93
-1%
85
-10%
92
-2%
86
-9%
89
-5%
Black Level *
0.02
0.01
50%
0.31
-1450%
0.29
-1350%
0.29
-1350%
0.37
-1750%
0.28
-1300%
Contrast
25000
48900
96%
1658
-93%
1483
-94%
1714
-93%
957
-96%
1504
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
0.8
33%
1.1
8%
0.7
42%
1.2
-0%
1.66
-38%
3.2
-167%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.6
1.3
50%
2.3
12%
1.3
50%
2.8
-8%
3.83
-47%
5.5
-112%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.1
35%
1.8
-6%
1.3
24%
1.9
-12%
1.6
6%
4.4
-159%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.24 98%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
2.14 103%
2.23 99%
2.22 99%
CCT
6791 96%
6764 96%
6526 100%
6821 95%
6542 99%
6384 102%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.6
0.4
0.8
2
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2% / 12%
11% / -71%
-65% / -126%
-81% / -134%
-68% / -173%
-77% / -167%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker

显示器的出厂校准非常好,无论是在灰度还是在色彩方面,都没有与P3参考色彩空间发生重大偏差。因此,即使色温略微过冷,也没有必要进行后续校准。与以前的Pro型号一样,我们无法校准显示器,因此在这一点上无法提供一个配置文件。P3色彩空间被完全覆盖。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

该迷你LED显示屏继续使用PWM来调节亮度。在正常的SDR模式下,这在整个亮度范围内是可以测量的,并使用14.88kHz的非常高的频率。这应该会减少受闪烁影响的人的数量。即使我们通过Vivid应用程序增加亮度,亮度也是通过PWM控制的。另一方面,在Vivid的最大亮度下,频率会转移到更高的40KHz。每次变化的振幅(即亮度的差异)相对较高。

最小亮度下的PWM(1级)
最小亮度下的PWM(1级)
PWM在25%左右的SDR
PWM在25%左右的SDR
在50%左右的SDR下的PWM
在50%左右的SDR下的PWM
在75%左右的SDR下的PWM
在75%左右的SDR下的PWM
在大约100%的SDR(500cd)下的PWM
在大约100%的SDR(500cd)下的PWM

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 14880 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting
≤ 500 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 14880 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % (500 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 14880 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18071 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

由于PWM控制的原因,测量显示器响应时间的确切时间是很困难的,我们只能因此给出一个近似值。白底黑字测试中的进度曲线是奇怪的。在这里,亮度分几步增加,只有在降低亮度时才是 "正常 "的。测量值更多的是在中下层,无法跟上快速的OLED显示器。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.2 ms rise
↘ 15.2 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.8 ms rise
↘ 22.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.9 ms).
在阳光下
在阳光下
室外(阴天)
室外(阴天)

不幸的是,目前天气不允许我们在明亮的天空下或在阳光下拍摄户外照片,这就是为什么我们暂时使用MacBook Pro 14 2021的以前的照片。基本上,MBP的显示屏不像大多数Windows设备那样会反光,良好的亮度和极高的对比度自然也在此有所帮助。只要你能避免直接反射,MacBook在明亮的环境中工作得很好。如果你需要超过500尼特的亮度,你也可以使用Vivid应用程序,例如,它可以让你在全屏模式下达到~1,000-1,100尼特,甚至在SDR模式下。迷你LED面板的可视角度稳定性也非常好。

视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - M2 Pro具有更多的效率核心

Apple M2 Pro (来源: )Apple
Apple M2 Pro (来源: )Apple

新的 M2 Pro-M2 Max SoCs是以前芯片的改进版,采用改进的5纳米工艺(N5P)制造,但基本架构没有变化。该 M2芯片是与 去年与MacBook Air去年推出的M2芯片已经暗示了事情的发展方向。性能核心的数量是相同的,但有两个额外的效率核心(共4个)。MacBook Pro 14还继续提供瘦身机型,配备6个性能核心和16个核心的GPU,而配备12个CPU核心(8P+4E)的完整M2 Pro仅在大号机型中是标准配置。 MacBook Pro 16.

根据Apple "在线商店 "中列出的官方价格,在基本型号(1999.00美元)的基础上增加了以下附加费。在美国的官方价格。在其他国家或其他在线零售商,价格(以及附加费)的差异可能较小或较大。

SoC CPU核心 GPU核心 RAM 附加费用
M2 Pro 4个效率核心和6个性能核心 16 16或32 GB
M2 Pro 4个效率核心和8个性能核心 19 16或32 GB 500美元
M2 Max 4个效率核心和8个性能核心 30 32、64或96 GB 1,100美元
M2 Max 4个效率核心和8个性能核心 38 32、64或96 GB 1,500美元

与上一代产品一样,CPU性能几乎相同,但新的M2芯片现在支持单核提升。在多核运行中,效率核心最高可达到2424 MHz,性能核心最高可达到3264 MHz。在单核运行中,P核在M2 Pro上能够达到3504 MHz,在M2 Max上甚至能够达到3,696 MHz。

M2 Pro和M2 Max之间的最大区别再次是集成显卡,现在它的核心也明显增多。此外,Apple ,共享内存的最大可能大小增加到96GB。尽管基本价格提高了,但升级也变得更加昂贵。特别是内存的价格相当可观:从16GB内存升级到32GB内存将使你花费400美元。因此,如果你想要M2 Max,你将不得不比基本型号多支付1100美元。考虑到M.2格式的快速PCIe 4.0固态硬盘已经可以以大约120美元的价格买到,固态硬盘的附加费用也仍然非常高(例如,从512GB到1TB需要200美元)。对于配备M2 Max、96GB内存和8TB SSD存储的最大配置的MacBook Pro 14 2023,最终价格为6,798.98美元。

处理器 - M2 Pro,有12个CPU核心

我们审查设备中的M2 Pro ,提供了一个4个核心的效率集群和两个各4个核心的性能集群,因此总共有12个核心和12个线程。在拥有8个P核的旧版M1 Pro中,我们测得CPU核在满负荷时的消耗量为27瓦和31瓦。在新的M2 Pro中,CPU现在消耗34瓦,尽管内部功率计量工具不再显示软件包的功率。基于纯粹的CPU消耗,我们看到最大负荷下的消耗量增加了25%。新SoC的效率将在另一篇文章中进一步详细讨论。

简而言之,Apple 已经能够提高性能。在Cinebench R23等原生基准测试中,单核性能现在比旧的M1 Pro/M1 Max快7%左右,比M2在MacBook Pro 13.Geekbench显示比M1 Pro领先11%,而M2则几乎持平。单核消耗从4瓦左右增加到6-7瓦左右。

在多核测试中,我们看到比M1 Pro领先20%,这也是Apple 所宣传的。与普通M2处理器相比,这里的领先优势甚至几乎达到70%。

在原生的Cinebench R23测试中,新的M2 Pro也很容易保持在英特尔酷睿i7-12700H在64瓦运行时,像在 联想Yoga Slim 7i Pro.然而,酷睿i7在单核测试中仍有轻微优势,但当你考虑到酷睿i7的性能核心需要23瓦左右,而M2 Pro仅有6-7瓦多一点时,这就非常令人印象深刻。新的MacBook Pro 14也明显超过了AMD的 Ryzen 9 6900HX中的AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX处理器。 Razer Blade 14.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

012024036048060072084096010801200132014401560168018001920204021602280Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro: Ø2069 (2052.12-2075.23)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1684 (1672.66-1688.19)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2055 (2007.13-2332.91)
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø947 (936.68-1007.91)
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2265 (2136.18-2287.68)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1988 (1948.94-2166.26)

虽然Cinebench R15的结果不具有代表性,因为该基准必须是模拟的,但多循环仍然可以很好地表明CPU在持续负载下的性能。在这里,MacBook Pro 14没有表现出任何弱点,可以轻松地保持其性能,没有任何问题。

这也适用于电池操作,CPU性能保持完全稳定(即使在低电池水平下,在3%的情况下,消耗也只下降到3瓦)。更多CPU基准测试可在我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
14917 Points +1%
Average Apple M2 Pro
  (14787 - 14802, n=2)
14795 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14787 Points
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14120 (13823.2min - 14120max) Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3127 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)
13837 Points -6%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
13572 Points -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
12386 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12370 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8745 Points -41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
6495 Points -56%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
1701 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia
  (878 - 2110, n=97, last 2 years)
1701 Points +3%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1678 Points +2%
Average Apple M2 Pro
  (1647 - 1648, n=2)
1648 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1647 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1581 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1534 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
1533 Points -7%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1529 Points -7%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1497 Points -9%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5762 Points +42%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5461 Points +35%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
5247 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1192 - 11768, n=96, last 2 years)
5204 Points +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
4044 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro
  (4018 - 4044, n=2)
4031 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
2750 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
2721 Points -33%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
2526 Points -38%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
2349 Points -42%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
701 Points +57%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
672 Points +50%
Average of class Multimedia
  (341 - 812, n=96, last 2 years)
638 Points +43%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
601 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
578 Points +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
447 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro
  (446 - 447, n=2)
447 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
395 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
393 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
381 Points -15%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
2333 (2007.13min - 2332.91max) Points +13%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2288 (2136.18min - 2287.68max) Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (580 - 4703, n=105, last 2 years)
2270 Points +10%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2166 (1948.94min - 2166.26max) Points +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
2069 (2052.12min, 2054.58P1 - 2075.23max) Points
Average Apple M2 Pro
 
2069 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1690 (1675min - 1690max) Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
1689 (1667min - 1689max) Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1229 (1226.62min, 1226.74P1 - 1232.55max) Points -41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1008 (936.68min - 1007.91max) Points -51%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (142.6 - 308, n=98, last 2 years)
248 Points +8%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
245 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
245 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
230 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro
 
230 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
223 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
223 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
210 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
209 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average Apple M2 Pro
  (14859 - 15013, n=3)
14961 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
14859 Points
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
12843 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
12563 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
12499 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia
  (3307 - 23059, n=99, last 2 years)
11100 Points -25%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
10976 Points -26%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
9647 Points -35%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8962 Points -40%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
5701 Points -62%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
1961 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro
  (1952 - 1961, n=3)
1957 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1937 Points -1%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1778 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro
1768 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max
1764 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
1762 Points -10%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2342, n=99, last 2 years)
1740 Points -11%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1558 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
1551 Points -21%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H
54.6 s *
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
50.1 s *
Average of class Multimedia
  (6.7 - 84.9, n=91, last 2 years)
48.6 s *
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.7 s *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.8 s *
Average Apple M2 Pro
 
6.7 s *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (190 - 1374, n=79, last 2 years)
452 Seconds * -37%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
388 Seconds * -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro
331 Seconds *
Average Apple M2 Pro
 
331 Seconds * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
140.91 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
230 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2069 Points
Help

系统性能

新的MacBook Pro 14 M2是一台速度极快、反应迅速的机器,但上一代产品也是如此,在日常使用中,你不会注意到两个版本之间有任何区别。在跨平台的CrossMark测试中,性能提高了约12%,在浏览器基准测试中性能也很出色。

为了完整起见,我们再次包括PudgetBench对Adobe Photoshop和Premiere Pro的测试结果,但测试只在模拟的英特尔版本的应用程序中运行。但如果你启动Apple Silicon的应用程序,速度优势是巨大的,Adobe的应用程序在MacBooks上运行得非常好。基本上,Apple SoC在图像和视频编辑方面的工作非常出色。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Jetstream 2: Total Score
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score 0.9
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score
CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1812 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (1797 - 1812, n=2)
1805 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1786 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1009 - 2146, n=89, last 2 years)
1682 Points -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1654 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1615 Points -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1507 Points -17%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1407 Points -22%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1653 Points +6%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1625 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (971 - 2064, n=89, last 2 years)
1608 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1562 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (1537 - 1562, n=2)
1550 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1417 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1382 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1379 Points -12%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (2330 - 2338, n=2)
2334 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
2330 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
2160 Points -7%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2049 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (933 - 2865, n=89, last 2 years)
1866 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1841 Points -21%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1727 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1472 Points -37%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1531 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1491 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia
  (926 - 2171, n=89, last 2 years)
1453 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1333 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (1306 - 1333, n=2)
1320 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
1202 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1087 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1069 Points -20%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
202 fps +20%
Average of class Multimedia
  (67 - 294, n=8, last 2 years)
176.9 fps +5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
169 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
169 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
85 fps -50%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 68, n=8, last 2 years)
46.4 fps +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
43 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
43 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
29 fps -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
24 fps -44%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
264.4 Points +11%
Average of class Multimedia
  (150.6 - 337, n=61, last 2 years)
260 Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
239 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
239 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
227.4 Points -5%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
218.069 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
212.5 Points -11%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
192.8 Points -19%
Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
406.6 runs/min +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
403 runs/min
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
403 runs/min 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (153.9 - 562, n=37, last 2 years)
342 runs/min -15%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
307 runs/min -24%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
282 runs/min -30%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
198 runs/min -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
657 ms * -48%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
585 ms * -32%
Average of class Multimedia
  (363 - 1016, n=96, last 2 years)
554 ms * -25%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
531 ms * -20%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
530 ms * -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
491.1 ms * -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
449.2 ms * -1%
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
444 ms * -0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
443.8 ms *
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
386 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
386 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
379 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
360 Points -7%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
301 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia
  (171.4 - 432, n=93, last 2 years)
292 Points -24%
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
277 Points -28%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
248 Points -36%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
256 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
253 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
253 Points 0%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
249 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia
  (133.2 - 348, n=66, last 2 years)
246 Points -3%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
1167 Points +28%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
913 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
913 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (413 - 1118, n=5, last 2 years)
798 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
537 Points -41%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
455 Points -50%
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Average of class Multimedia
  (737 - 1442, n=12, last 2 years)
1115 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
1075 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (951 - 1075, n=2)
1013 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
806 Points -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
796 Points -26%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
726 Points -32%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

无定形磁盘标记
无定形磁盘标记

2021年型号的MacBook Pro已经配备了快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,但据说配备512GB内存的新基本型号只配备了一个存储设备,这对性能产生了负面影响。我们很快就会亲自测试,但我们评测设备的2TB型号在速度上没有任何问题:读取速度超过6.5GB/s,写入速度约为7.7GB/s,该硬盘的速度非常快。在第一次启动后,用户仍有1.97TB的可用空间。更多的SSD基准测试列在这里.

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
 
99.9 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
98.7 pt
Average of class Multimedia
 
84.7 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple SSD AP0512
81.8 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
49.4 pt
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
5359.8 MB/s
Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
  (5294 - 5379, n=3)
5344 MB/s 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple SSD AP0512
5146 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (2877 - 5666, n=9, last 2 years)
4638 MB/s -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2819.3 MB/s -47%
5GB Write
Average Apple SSD AP2048Z
  (6389 - 6699, n=3)
6563 MB/s +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple SSD AP2048Z
6388.9 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia
  (2993 - 8271, n=9, last 2 years)
5440 MB/s -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple SSD AP0512
4437 MB/s -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
3036.1 MB/s -52%

图形卡

的新图形单元。M2 Pro提供16或19个GPU核心,时钟频率最高为1.4GHz。GPU的功耗也有一定程度的增加,但与之前的22瓦相比,差距明显降低到25瓦(M1 Pro 16C GPU与普通的M2处理器一样,GPU再次变得更加高效:与M1 Pro相比,基准测试中的性能提高了约25%,而与拥有24个GPU内核的M1 Max相比,差距则更大。 拥有24个GPU核心的M1 Max仅为11-18%(取决于测试)。

与Nvidia GPU相比,拥有19个核心的拥有19个内核的M2 Pro GPU在很大程度上处于 RTX 3050 Ti (50瓦)RTX 3060(95W)之间,并与 Radeon RX 6600M(80W),考虑到25瓦的低消耗,这又是一个出色的结果。图形性能在持续负载和电池模式下都保持完全稳定。

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
20228 Points +56%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
15730 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5-21DE003RGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14493 Points +12%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (12968 - 12997, n=2)
12983 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
12968 Points
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12910 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1867 - 31403, n=36, last 2 years)
12693 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10352 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
9565 Points -26%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9340 Points -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points -29%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9041 Points -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6823 Points -47%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
18779 Points +46%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
14727 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
12875 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
12875 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
10351 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
9501 Points -26%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
9461 Points -27%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9404 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9089 Points -29%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
8976 Points -30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (1854 - 20732, n=16, last 2 years)
8679 Points -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6728 Points -48%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
106415 Points +127%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme G5-21DE003RGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
93591 Points +99%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
61072 Points +30%
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
61067 Points +30%
HP ZBook Power 15 G9 6B8C4EA
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
60506 Points +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
60482 Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
58047 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia
  (9849 - 120093, n=98, last 2 years)
55391 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53776 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
51568 Points +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
46941 Points
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (45047 - 46941, n=2)
45994 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
37867 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points -25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27602 Points -41%
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
67868 Points +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (34398 - 100376, n=9, last 2 years)
63778 Points +23%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
58191 Points +12%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (52054 - 52608, n=2)
52331 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
52054 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
42115 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
37319 Points -28%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30166 Points -42%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
139.6 fps +52%
Average of class Multimedia
  (29.6 - 204, n=11, last 2 years)
103.3 fps +12%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (92.1 - 92.2, n=2)
92.2 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
92.1 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
71.7 fps -22%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
310.3 fps +47%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
240 fps +14%
Average of class Multimedia
  (62.8 - 446, n=11, last 2 years)
232 fps +10%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (210 - 211, n=2)
211 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
210.4 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
166 fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
109.8 fps -48%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
108 fps -49%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
752 fps +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
636 fps +13%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (565 - 568, n=2)
567 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
565.3 fps
Average of class Multimedia
  (160 - 950, n=11, last 2 years)
555 fps -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
436 fps -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
295 fps -48%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
255 fps -55%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (434 - 436, n=2)
435 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
434.4 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
424.2 fps -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple M1 Max
416 fps -4%
Average of class Multimedia
  (125 - 585, n=11, last 2 years)
400 fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro
345 fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
316 fps -27%
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11370H
252 fps -42%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
229.9 fps -47%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
97 Seconds *
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
97 Seconds * -0%
Average of class Multimedia
  (29.6 - 132, n=8, last 2 years)
75.6 Seconds * +22%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
58 Seconds *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
53 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (22 - 99, n=42, last 2 years)
42.6 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
111 Seconds *
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
91 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia
  (35 - 152, n=44, last 2 years)
76.4 Seconds *
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
456 Seconds * -38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (190 - 1374, n=79, last 2 years)
452 Seconds * -37%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
388 Seconds * -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
331 Seconds *
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
331 Seconds * -0%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

游戏在Mac上慢慢变得更有趣,因为现在有更多的游戏在M1和现在的M2上原生运行。例如,这包括《生化危机村》,它在MacBook Pro 14与M2 Pro上以1080p的最大细节(60-90FPS之间)完美流畅地运行,这可以从以下视频的演示序列中清楚地看到。此外,我们还进行了模拟游戏的常规基准测试,这些游戏也运行正常。然而,我们在与Steam连接的Crossover程序(可用于运行Windows游戏)方面遇到了一些困难,因此我们至今无法运行 Witcher 3《GTA V》 至今。


在仿真游戏《古墓丽影》《全面战争:三国》中,新的M2 Pro也比旧的M1 Pro领先约25%,比拥有24个核心的M1 Max落后约15%。在《边疆3》中,领先幅度略小,为11-16%。

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
87 fps +38%
Average of class Multimedia
  (32 - 153, n=13, last 2 years)
83.5 fps +33%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
77 fps +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
63 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
63 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
50 (37min) fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
46 fps -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
31 fps -51%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SM
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
97 fps +35%
Average of class Multimedia
  (38 - 146, n=12, last 2 years)
87.3 fps +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
79 fps +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
72 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
72 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
57 (45min) fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps -26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
36 fps -50%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
104 fps +30%
Average of class Multimedia
  (43 - 150, n=10, last 2 years)
85.2 fps +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
85 fps +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
80 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
80 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
63 (48min) fps -21%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
58 fps -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
39 fps -51%
Total War: Three Kingdoms
1920x1080 High (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
80 fps +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (33 - 113, n=8, last 2 years)
69.8 fps +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
62 fps +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
54 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
54 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
43.8 fps -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
36 fps -33%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
29 fps -46%
1920x1080 Ultra (incl textures)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
59 fps +48%
Average of class Multimedia
  (24 - 84, n=8, last 2 years)
51.5 fps +29%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
46 fps +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
40 fps
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
40 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
31.8 fps -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
27 fps -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
21 fps -47%
Borderlands 3
1920x1080 Medium Overall Quality (DX11)
Average of class Multimedia
  (52 - 72, n=5, last 2 years)
61 fps +13%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (54 - 60.3, n=2)
57.2 fps +6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
55.3 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
54 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
48 fps -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
47.7 fps -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
39.4 fps -27%
1920x1080 High Overall Quality (DX11)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
47.6 fps +19%
Average of class Multimedia
  (38 - 60.2, n=5, last 2 years)
45.2 fps +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
40.7 fps +2%
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
  (40 - 40.6, n=2)
40.3 fps +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
40 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Apple M1 Pro, Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
34.8 fps -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
31.9 fps -20%
low med. high ultraQHD
The Witcher 3 (2015) 57 51
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 169 80 72 63 40
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 269 84 54 40 25
Borderlands 3 (2019) 79 54 40 29

排放 - MacBook在日常使用中始终保持安静

噪声

两个风扇中的一个
两个风扇中的一个

2023型号的MacBook Pro 14在日常使用中也是一个非常安静的设备,两个风扇经常完全停用。Apple ,继续使用一个非常防御性的风扇曲线,允许芯片在风扇启动之前达到100℃。作为一项规则,这对于承受长时间的负载高峰而不使用风扇是绰绰有余的。然而,在负载下,风扇速度总是有一些波动。我们希望这里有一个稳定的噪音。

前两个风扇速度(高达2800转/分)在正常坐姿下几乎听不到,最大为26分贝(A)。我们在CPU纯负荷(多核)以及游戏(RE村)中都测得33-36分贝(A),在压力测试中最大为43.2分贝(A),据此该数值很快就平息在39-40分贝(A)。最大的风扇转速为6800转/分,比前代产品要高,在这个水平上,风扇的轰鸣声高达52分贝(A),我们只能手动触发。没有发现其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A)
Load
26 / 43.2 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.531.430.230.530.92832.728.62527.827.526.328.528.323.228.627.33127.325.323.325.122.823.724.423.14032.130.931.331.83233.831.431.75025.523.225.524.524.9222624.163242321.722.923.721.424.422.18022.621.62019.918.918.118.418.810019.523.122.722.421.520.219.718.712519.422.619.117.916.517.416.316.316018.120.616.416.114.41513.714.420021.521.618.518.715.918.817.417.325019.32320.120.117.618.217.717.93151823.919.819.116.216.715.416.240017.725.919.81813.91211.412.350019.127.721.120.315.512.81213.763017.727.320.619.41411.811.412.380020.929.424.222.415.612.31012.4100023.231.627.424.21713.210.212.6125020.931.425.623.215.111.71011.4160021.833.327.224.715.412.310.611.2200021.134.427.224.213.711.810.711.2250020.335.62823.913.211.811.211.6315015.430.52217.812.21211.612400014.831.423.618.512.312.311.912.1500013.229.819.214.512.612.712.312.363001325.914.313.312.612.812.412.5800013.12013.613.212.712.912.612.8100001316.71313.212.913.112.512.71250013.115.212.712.9131312.412.51600012.61312.112.412.412.411.811.8SPL3143.236.333.326.224.823.924.5N1.33.92.11.60.80.60.50.6median 18.1median 25.9median 20.1median 18.7median 14median 12.8median 12median 12.5Delta3.15.44.24.2221.91.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP0512
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Noise
-1%
-8%
-17%
-8%
-3%
-17%
off / environment *
23.9
23.9
-0%
24.8
-4%
24.6
-3%
24.7
-3%
23.3
3%
24.4
-2%
Idle Minimum *
23.9
23.9
-0%
24.8
-4%
24.6
-3%
24.7
-3%
23.3
3%
24.4
-2%
Idle Average *
23.9
23.9
-0%
24.8
-4%
24.6
-3%
24.7
-3%
23.3
3%
24.4
-2%
Idle Maximum *
23.9
23.9
-0%
24.8
-4%
24.6
-3%
24.7
-3%
23.3
3%
27.8
-16%
Load Average *
26
23.9
8%
30.4
-17%
45.1
-73%
33.2
-28%
34.7
-33%
43.3
-67%
Load Maximum *
43.2
49
-13%
49.5
-15%
50.4
-17%
46.7
-8%
42.1
3%
48.8
-13%
Witcher 3 ultra *
34.6
35.8
49.1
44.5
42.1
48.2

* ... smaller is better

温度

金属外壳在空转和低负荷时几乎不发热。然而,在负载情况下,特别是中央键盘区域仍然非常热,超过45°C,这在游戏时也很明显(这里的温度与压力测试相当)。在底部,金属外壳的温度仍然明显低于40°C,你可以将MBP 14放在膝盖上,不必担心。

Max. Load
 41.2 °C46.9 °C40.2 °C 
 40 °C45.3 °C38.4 °C 
 30.5 °C27.6 °C30.5 °C 
Maximum: 46.9 °C
Average: 37.8 °C
41.1 °C41.7 °C41.3 °C
37.7 °C40.7 °C37.9 °C
31.5 °C31.6 °C30.8 °C
Maximum: 41.7 °C
Average: 37.1 °C
Power Supply (max.)  43.1 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.9 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶面)
表面温度应力测试(顶面)
表面温度应力测试(底面)
表面温度应力测试(底面)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-9%
-8%
-23%
-0%
-35%
-27%
Maximum Upper Side *
46.9
45.1
4%
49.2
-5%
48
-2%
42.3
10%
40.6
13%
48.4
-3%
Maximum Bottom *
41.7
43
-3%
44.1
-6%
50.2
-20%
38.2
8%
42.6
-2%
57.1
-37%
Idle Upper Side *
21.4
25.2
-18%
23.5
-10%
27.7
-29%
23.4
-9%
38
-78%
28.1
-31%
Idle Bottom *
21.4
25.4
-19%
23.6
-10%
30.1
-41%
23.5
-10%
37
-73%
29
-36%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

压力测试的结果让我们有点吃惊,因为当CPU和GPU同时被置于负载之下时,CPU的性能会被大大扼杀。为了进行压力测试,我们使用了本地应用程序3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test和Cinebench R23。在压力测试开始时,M2 Pro的总消耗量跃升至47瓦,两个组件都有~23瓦可供支配,但仅1-2秒后,总消耗量就被限制在34瓦。在这里,GPU明显受到青睐,以整整25瓦的功率工作,而处理器仅以约8瓦的功率工作。

我们怀疑Apple ,把这个限制放在那里,以便在主电源和电池电源上的性能是相同的。正如我们稍后所见,我们的评测设备在压力测试开始时消耗了大约100瓦,后来又消耗了70瓦多一点的电量。当然,70瓦的电池是无法提供100瓦的。

压力测试的开始。总消耗量为47W
压力测试的开始。总消耗量为47W
几秒钟后进行压力测试。总消耗34W
几秒钟后进行压力测试。总消耗34W
0510152025Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø8.08 (7.65-23.333)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø25 (23.803-25.493)

发言人

MacBook Pro 14继续使用6个扬声器,产生非常好的声音。在我们的分析中,2023款的表现比它的前任略差前辈,但如果不与旧款直接比较,你就无法分辨出差别。也许这只是由于软件上的一个小变化。尽管如此,MBP 14仍然是拥有最佳扬声器的14英寸笔记本,只是刚刚被较大的 MacBook Pro 16.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.732.22528.6283124.428.24031.434.4502633.36324.443.18018.454.910019.76612516.367.116013.763.920017.466.325017.769.431515.472.840011.473.35001270.763011.473.98001073.4100010.271.912501071.9160010.673.2200010.774.1250011.272.2315011.675400011.969.9500012.372.8630012.469.9800012.665.81000012.565.91250012.465.11600011.864.5SPL23.984.3N0.566.6median 12median 70.7Delta1.93.430.235.431.734.925.834.932.236.927.535.924.544.323.154.723.365.121.966.320.164.521.566.818.869.817.671.914.972.613.770.91473.611.273.711.171.610.772.312.272.411.273.511.674.511.775.7127312.273.812.469.712.568.212.667.112.563.911.968.524.884.90.668.3median 12.5median 71.62.42.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--MBP 2023有更多的耐力

消耗功率

与它的前辈M1 Pro相比,Apple ,已经能够稍微减少空闲消耗。考虑到高分辨率和500cd/m²的亮度,11.5瓦的最大值是非常好的。然而,我们在HDR模式下测得的数值高达24瓦。另一方面,在负载情况下,没有什么变化--我们测得的短期最大值略低于100瓦,很快就趋于平稳,达到72瓦。因此,所提供的96瓦的电源适配器的尺寸是足够的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.26 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.4 / 11.3 / 11.5 Watt
Load midlight 59.6 / 100 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.30
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, IPS, 2400x1600, 14.40
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00
Average Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
 
Average of class Multimedia
 
Power Consumption
3%
-15%
38%
-50%
-2%
-158%
-53%
0%
-55%
Idle Minimum *
2.4
2.9
-21%
3.2
-33%
1.77
26%
7.1
-196%
2.6
-8%
10.2
-325%
7.5
-213%
2.4
-0%
7.2 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=95, last 2 years)
-200%
Idle Average *
11.3
11.6
-3%
12.6
-12%
6.7
41%
10.8
4%
7.1
37%
26
-130%
10.4
8%
11.3
-0%
11.6 ?(4.6 - 43, n=95, last 2 years)
-3%
Idle Maximum *
11.5
11.9
-3%
13
-13%
6.9
40%
11.6
-1%
7.9
31%
26.7
-132%
11.4
1%
11.5
-0%
14.4 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=95, last 2 years)
-25%
Load Average *
59.6
49.5
17%
57.9
3%
30.9
48%
84.8
-42%
76.8
-29%
89.3
-50%
83.3
-40%
59.6
-0%
76.5 ?(14.3 - 147, n=94, last 2 years)
-28%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.9
58.2
-4%
76.3
-36%
38.9
30%
91.3
-63%
83
-48%
158.7
-184%
92.7
-66%
Load Maximum *
100
68.5
31%
97.7
2%
56
44%
100.8
-1%
97.3
3%
227.5
-128%
110.3
-10%
100
-0%
118.1 ?(44 - 247, n=94, last 2 years)
-18%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55.9 (55-56.9)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø72.6 (65.5-100.1)

Power Consumption with an External Monitor

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø11.7 (9.94-13.6)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø53.7 (50.8-60.8)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø49.6 (48.4-50.8)

电池寿命

总体而言,电池寿命得到了改善。其结果几乎与前代产品在150cd/m²的负载测试(70分钟)和WLAN测试(13.5小时)中(亮度分7大步和2小步降低)。在全亮度下,WLAN测试的时间略多于7小时,长了半个多小时,而在150cd/m²的视频测试中,几乎是18小时,比旧款多了近三个小时。额外的效率核心在这里肯定会得到回报。然而,HDR下的视频播放仍然可以很快耗尽电池,因为4K和HDR下的YouTube视频运行了4:33小时,这又比前代产品略长。

在设备开启的情况下,用96瓦的电源进行完整的充电过程几乎正好需要两个小时,其中50%的容量在30多分钟后就可以再次使用,80%的容量在一小时后就可以使用。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
13h 27min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
7h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 10min
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, 70 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Max 24-Core GPU
M1 Max, M1 Max 24-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 14IAH7 82TK006CGE
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 70 Wh
Microsoft Surface Laptop Studio i7 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 58 Wh
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 62 Wh
SCHENKER Vision 14 2022 RTX 3050 Ti
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh
Average of class Multimedia
 
Battery Runtime
-1%
-18%
34%
-19%
-25%
2%
8%
-5%
H.264
917
900
-2%
726
-21%
1153
26%
532
-42%
739
-19%
666
-27%
690 ?(319 - 1481, n=50, last 2 years)
-25%
WiFi v1.3
807
816
1%
697
-14%
1144
42%
434
-46%
480
-41%
571
-29%
607
-25%
561 ?(262 - 1204, n=93, last 2 years)
-30%
Load
70
69
-1%
92
31%
60
-14%
93
33%
124
77%
97 ?(39 - 215, n=74, last 2 years)
39%

Pros

+ 高质量和稳定的外壳
+ 显示效果好,色彩准确
+ 极高的HDR亮度
+ 在日常使用中几乎总是非常安静
+ 非常高的系统性能
+ 非常快的M2 Pro SoC
+ 非常长的电池寿命
+ 卓越的扬声器
+ 高达96GB内存和8TB SSD存储

Cons

- 在Cpu和Gpu的同时负荷下,性能有限。
- 在SDR模式下,亮度限制在500 cd/m²。
- 持续的PWM闪动
- 只有一年的保修期
- 基本上没有维护选项
- 内存和SSD存储的附加费用非常高
- 没有Face ID或中心舞台的网络摄像头

结论 - MacBook Pro 14价格昂贵,但性能极好

在审查中。 Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro。评测设备由Apple 德国提供。
在审查中。 Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro。评测设备由Apple 德国提供。

很多人(包括我们)期待新的MacBook Pro机型采用3纳米SoC。尽管改进了5纳米工艺,新的M2 Pro是一个非常坚实的升级。图形性能增加了约25%,同时效率也有明显提高。处理器的性能也出现了高达20%的飞跃,但这伴随着高达25%的消耗增加。我们计划很快对新M2 SoC的效率进行更详细的分析。在日常使用中,新芯片的效率肯定更高,这仅仅是由于两个额外的效率核心能够承担更多的工作。

从根本上说,Apple ,它保持了对AMD和英特尔的优势,特别是在优化的应用中,鉴于相对较低的功耗,其结果非常好。此外,另一个显著的优势是,在电池模式下,性能控制也可以完全进入。然而,Apple ,也会减慢 M2 Pro有点慢,因为当CPU和GPU同时受力时,处理器就会被大幅削减。在这种情况下,M2 Pro可以提供更多的性能(散热可以处理,因为这里也有改进的空间),但Apple ,似乎决定不这样做。这有两个可能的原因:要么是电池性能不应该与主电源操作不同,即使是在这种极端情况下,要么是MacBook Pro根本不应该变得太吵。在任何情况下,潜力在这里被浪费了,由于新的M2 Max的图形单元(38个GPU核心)在MacBook Pro 16中能够消耗超过50瓦,在较小的MBP 14中使用大型M2 Max几乎不值得。

在其他方面,Apple ,解决了一些批评的要点,最终安装了HDMI 2.1和用于现代6GHz网络的快速Wi-Fi 6E。电池寿命在某些情况下也有所改善,迷你LED显示屏和音响系统都仍然值得参考。

MacBook Pro 2023的M2 Pro刚刚变得更好,现在提供更多性能。此外,客户现在得到了快速的Wi-Fi和改进的HDMI输出。价格可能很高,但新的MacBook Pro 14也是一台该死的好机器。然而,用M1 Pro从上一代产品转换过来,其实并不值得。

当然,仍有一些批评意见,这里只需提到不存在的维护或升级选项。如果这些标准是购买的决定性因素,那么尽管MacBook Pro 14在客观上具有出色的性能价值,但它立即失去了资格。此外,额外的RAM和SSD存储的附加费用仍然非常高。为了公平起见,我们应该记住,许多其他制造商正越来越多地依赖焊接部件,并且也限制了他们的高端设备的维护和/或升级选项。

在14英寸领域,不容易找到可比的竞争者。微软的 Surface Laptop Studio采用老式的Tiger Lake 处理器,性能较弱,而且在图形性能方面也落后。目前,Windows阵营中最有趣的竞争对手可能是 申科视界14它在性能方面可以跟上,尽管它的重量明显较低,而且也是非常模块化的。旧的 MacBook Pro 14 M1 Pro也仍然是一个值得考虑的选择。与配备快速M2 Pro、16GB内存和1TB固态硬盘的基本型号(建议零售价为2,999欧元)相比,使用相同配置的MacBook Pro 14 M1 Pro可以节省约600-700欧元。这里的性能略低,但仍然非常有竞争力。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

新的MacBook Pro 14似乎在全世界广泛销售。有兴趣的买家应该(在可能的情况下)比较Apple"的官方网站和通过典型零售商(如亚马逊)的价格。例如,在美国,我们审查的配置(M2 Pro(12C CPU),16GB内存和1TB SSD)可通过Apple ,价格为2,499.00美元。.在亚马逊,这个价格也便宜不了多少,US$2.489,00.其他零售商的差异可能更大。

价格截止到2023年1月28日,可能会有变化。

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro - 01/27/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
74 / 80 → 92%
Weight
68 / 20-72 → 92%
Battery
90 / 95 → 95%
Display
93%
Games Performance
95 / 90 → 100%
Application Performance
98 / 90 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
90 / 95 → 94%
Audio
96%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Average
86%
94%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023评论。M2 Pro在小型MacBook Pro中被放慢了速度
Andreas Osthoff, 2023-01-29 (Update: 2023-01-29)