Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Omen 16游戏笔记本电脑评测。少即是多

不是一个奇迹般的机器,但足够了。 惠普的Omen 16配备了AMD的Ryzen处理器,在游戏组件的使用上很节俭。因此,不能期待顶级性能,但对于许多流行的游戏作品来说,这并不是严格意义上的必要。此外,即使在测试中发现了一些弱点,乐趣也不会因为看到价格而停止。
Mario Petzold, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
AMD Cezanne (Zen 3) Gaming Radeon Laptop / Notebook

与目前的许多竞争对手一样,惠普Omen使用16英寸显示屏。因此,这款游戏笔记本具有合理的便携性,同时还能提供令人愉悦的大画面。可以选择全高清或QHD作为分辨率大小。至于处理器,这是以AMD Ryzen的形式出现的,其中的带宽从Ryzen 5到Ryzen 9不等。

除了NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070(在我们对前身惠普Omen 16-b0085ng的测试中使用),还有AMD Radeon RX 6600M。这就是我们的测试设备与AMD Ryzen 7 5800H结合使用的东西。就性能而言,这款游戏笔记本大致相当于惠普Victus 16或微星Alpha 15,与惠普Omen 16一样,目前价格约为1300欧元(约1413美元)。

一个微妙的区别仍然存在。省电绝对不是它的长处之一。这对我们的测试结果有一些明显的影响。

HP Omen 16-c0077ng (Omen 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 134 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 6600M - 8192 MB, Core: 2416 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.15021.1001
Memory
16384 MB 
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 182 PPI, BOE09E5, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 899 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo Headset, Card Reader: SD Card Reader
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26 x 370 x 245
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HP Wide Vision 720p
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.25 kg, Power Supply: 750 g
Price
1700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
04/2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440
82.6 %
01/2022
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.4 kg23.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
11/2021
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg29 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.4 %
12/2021
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.3 %
10/2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
86.6 %
10/2021
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23 mm16.10"1920x1080
87.4 %
08/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg26.85 mm16.00"2560x1600

案例--惠普兆头的小光景

除了铰链之外,笔记本的外观是由塑料制成的。因此,结构的稳定性受到影响。虽然略微弯曲的键盘框架几乎看不出来,但大型显示屏似乎有点过于弯曲。特别是,用一只手打开它,屏幕会不必要地弯曲。像许多商务笔记本那样的铝制盖子在这里会有帮助。

总的来说,它的构造给人留下了高质量的印象。所有的部件都能很好地结合在一起,而且缝隙均匀。扭曲的可能性是有限的。但惠普可以让显示屏的框架更坚硬一些。铰链似乎也有点太弱了,以至于屏幕摇摇晃晃,但它仍然可以同时用一只手打开。

即使从远处看,彩虹色的标志也很突出。
即使从远处看,彩虹色的标志也很突出。
显示器可以打开到145°。
大风扇是必不可少的,但需要很大的空间。
刚好够大:铰链。

大尺寸是由于16英寸显示屏的缘故。即使是纤细的显示屏边缘也只能在有限的范围内进行补偿,因此,标准的笔记本电脑包或笔记本背包可能会太紧。在外壳厚度方面,惠普Omen 16比其前代产品厚3毫米(约0.12英寸)。由于冷却系统特别大,它在底座的后部区域突出于机箱,因此它的性能值也超过了其他具有类似性能的游戏笔记本电脑。

所有塑料的优点是重量相对较低,只有2.25公斤(约5.0磅)。然而,230瓦的电源使总重量增加到3公斤(约6.6磅)。

尺寸比较

370 mm 245 mm 26 mm 2.3 kg369.2 mm 248 mm 23 mm 2.4 kg361 mm 258 mm 29 mm 2.1 kg363.4 mm 255 mm 23.9 mm 2.3 kg359 mm 259 mm 23.95 mm 2.4 kg

硬件 - 适用于游戏笔记本

在三种不同的显示器输出之间的选择是值得称赞的。有了USB-C、miniDP和HDMI,几乎所有的外部显示器都能得到满足。由于有DP 1.4和HDMI 2.1,还可以连接4K以上分辨率的显示器。

机箱左右两边的USB接口,几乎可以毫无问题地连接桌面上的所有东西。然而,各个连接点之间的距离有时非常紧张。右边的两个USB端口只相隔4毫米(约0.16英寸)的宽度。

虽然端口的数量似乎非常实用,但特别是USB-A的速度是一个缺点。所有三个端口都只能达到5Gbit/s,因此只能达到USB 3.0标准。至少USB-C连接管理10 Gbit/s,但与这里不支持的Thunderbolt 4相比,这只是目前技术上可能做到的一小部分。

左边:电源,1Gbit网络,USB-A 3.0(5Gbit/s,HP睡眠和充电),miniDP,HDMI,USB-C(10Gbit/s,PD,DP),耳机,SD卡插槽
左边:电源,1Gbit网络,USB-A 3.0(5Gbit/s,HP睡眠和充电),miniDP,HDMI,USB-C(10Gbit/s,PD,DP),耳机,SD卡插槽
右:2个USB-A 3.0 (5 Gbit/s)
右:2个USB-A 3.0 (5 Gbit/s)

SD卡阅读器

用我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考存储卡测试,读卡器的速度可以明显提高。然而,那些不完全是雄心勃勃的爱好摄影的人几乎不会注意到这个缺点。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H (AV Pro V60)
201 MB/s ∼100% +190%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years)
117.3 MB/s ∼58% +70%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75 MB/s ∼37% +8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.2 MB/s ∼34%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
19.8 MB/s ∼10% -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H (AV Pro V60)
206 MB/s ∼100% +156%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=87, last 2 years)
136.8 MB/s ∼66% +70%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s ∼39%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s ∼37% -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
26.9 MB/s ∼13% -67%

沟通

除了局域网端口外,还提供了Wi-Fi 6。与惠普Victus 16一样,这里使用的是Realtek WLAN卡,在我们的测试中,这种硬件的性能大致是平均水平。但由于惠普Omen 16处于游戏笔记本的入门级领域,这应该足够了。然而,看看我们评测中所有游戏笔记本的平均值就会发现,吞吐率通常要高得多。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1424 (731min - 1507max) MBit/s ∼100% +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1622, n=166, last 2 years)
1158 MBit/s ∼81% +28%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1115 (720min - 827max) MBit/s ∼78% +23%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1084 (531min - 1102max) MBit/s ∼76% +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
967 (471min - 1048max) MBit/s ∼68% +7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
928 (483min - 1003max) MBit/s ∼65% +3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (492min - 1037max) MBit/s ∼63% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
904 (826min - 950max) MBit/s ∼63%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (424 - 928, n=20)
787 MBit/s ∼55% -13%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1665 (857min - 1700max) MBit/s ∼100% +131%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1487 (1350min - 1522max) MBit/s ∼89% +107%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=166, last 2 years)
1232 MBit/s ∼74% +71%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1052 (986min - 1142max) MBit/s ∼63% +46%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
992 (835min - 956max) MBit/s ∼60% +38%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
928 (868min - 988max) MBit/s ∼56% +29%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 877, n=20)
745 MBit/s ∼45% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
732 (376min - 763max) MBit/s ∼44% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
720 (664min - 751max) MBit/s ∼43%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
HP Omen 16-c0077ng RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø720 (664-751)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1383-1538)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (826-950)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1045 (936-1115)

网络摄像头

惠普Omen 16网络摄像头的分辨率和色彩准确性最多只能满足最低要求,尽管这是该领域的普遍做法。

ColorChecker
21.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
18 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 16-c0077ng: 18.72 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.42 ∆E

维护

没有隐藏的螺丝,没有牢固的塑料夹子。松开八颗螺丝后,需要一点技巧来拆卸底板。但是,一个扁平的撬动工具永远不会有坏处。

之后,所有的关键位置都很容易接触到,以便清洁通风或更换电池,电池被拧在六个点上。两个内存插槽可用于升级的可能性。另一个NVMe固态硬盘可以插入未配备的M.2插槽中。WLAN模块,安装在离热管有点太近的地方,对我们的口味来说,也可以被替换。

输入设备--游戏键盘会发出彩色的光芒


四个区域可以进行颜色调整。
四个区域可以进行颜色调整。

键盘

这款键盘似乎完全是为游戏而设。即使只有1毫米的下划线对要求高的用户来说似乎很浅,但防滑的表面和按键之间的适当距离确保了快速和准确的输入。右侧没有数字栏,而是有被赋予大量空间的方向键。不幸的是,它正上方的排列看起来有点混乱,这在最初是特别令人恼火的。删除 "和 "电源 "键并不完全在我们期望的位置。带有电源控制、颜色控制和其他实用的游戏额外功能的Omen游戏中心的快速通道被放在显眼的位置。

键盘照明非常好看。然而,在这里,有些东西被削减了。只有四个区域可供选择,它们可以发出18种不同的颜色的光芒。只有在安装了Omen Light Studio之后,才增加了一些额外的动作配置文件,这些配置文件一般都是面向声音播放或显示器的内容。由于颜色选择有限,而且一次只能显示四种颜色,所以效果显得很简陋。另一方面,带有独立 "WASD "键的静态显示看起来不错。

在我们的测试设备中,有一个工艺上的缺陷不应该不被提及。大写锁定 "键的位置是歪的。当背光开启时,这一点尤其明显,尽管该按钮的功能似乎没有受到影响。

没有数字键盘,但有空间容纳方向键和Omen游戏中心。
没有数字键盘,但有空间容纳方向键和Omen游戏中心。
大写字母锁安装得很歪。
大写字母锁安装得很歪。

触摸板

在所有的可能性中,人们很可能会用一个单独的鼠标来使用HP Omen 16。但触摸板是相当有说服力的。它反应迅速,磨砂而光滑的表面允许精确的控制,即使是用多个手指。当然,如果下面有几个按钮就更好了,但对于使用振荡式游戏鼠标的满腔热血的玩家来说,无论如何也是无趣的。

显示屏--惠普也考虑到了高要求的游戏玩家

在右下角可以看到一个非常微弱的光环。
在右下角可以看到一个非常微弱的光环。

除了这里使用的2,560×1,440像素的QHD显示屏外,惠普还为Omen 16提供了一个对角线屏幕尺寸为16.1英寸的全高清面板。由于它的尺寸,选择更高的分辨率似乎是合理的,因为屏幕看起来就像一个27英寸的桌面显示器,也站在27英寸之外。此外,全高清版本只提供144赫兹,而较大的变体则提供165赫兹。这种差异是否真的可以感觉到,完全是另一个问题。

与前辈或竞争对手Omen 16-b085ng或Victus 16相比,惠普已经将峰值亮度从400cd/m²降低到300cd/m²。当在办公桌上使用并远离光线明亮的工作站时,这种差异应该很难被注意到。另一方面,均匀的照明是一个积极的方面,由于亮度降低,屏幕出血现象也不那么明显了。在我们的测试机型中,只有右下角出现了极小的异常情况。

与其他惠普机型一样,我们无法确定PWM闪烁。在响应时间方面也没有什么可挑剔的。许多其他游戏笔记本也在10毫秒左右。

295
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09E5
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 297 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 282.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1350:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.25 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 6.97 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Panda LM156LF-2F03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-5%
-5%
-41%
4%
4%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
68.8
65.9
-4%
64.5
-6%
39.7
-42%
72.6
6%
72.3
5%
sRGB Coverage
96.9
91.6
-5%
95.9
-1%
59.7
-38%
100
3%
99.5
3%
99
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.1
67
-6%
65.8
-7%
41.1
-42%
73.5
3%
73.8
4%
73
3%
Response Times
44%
-16%
-208%
-9%
7%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13 ?(6, 7)
5.06 ?(2.5, 2.56)
61%
15
-15%
40.4 ?(18.4, 22)
-211%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
26%
8 ?(4.2, 3.8)
38%
9.2
29%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5, 5)
7.44 ?(3.76, 3.68)
26%
11.6
-16%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-204%
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
-44%
12.4 ?(6.6, 5.8)
-24%
4.8
52%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-20%
-2%
-49%
4%
-26%
14%
Brightness middle
297
311
5%
393
32%
283
-5%
361
22%
405
36%
551
86%
Brightness
283
325
15%
353
25%
266
-6%
341
20%
378
34%
523
85%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
83
-9%
85
-7%
88
-3%
87
-4%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.47
-114%
0.2
9%
0.3
-36%
0.34
-55%
0.54
-145%
Contrast
1350
1414
5%
836
-38%
1415
5%
1203
-11%
1191
-12%
1020
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.25
5.06
-56%
2.84
13%
5.32
-64%
2.44
25%
3.7
-14%
1.8
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.33
8.37
-32%
7.15
-13%
17.68
-179%
6.37
-1%
7.77
-23%
2.53
60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.11
2.62
-136%
0.67
40%
3.94
-255%
1.26
-14%
3.49
-214%
1.66
-50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.97
4.8
31%
3.73
46%
2.9
58%
4.6
34%
5.88
16%
1.85
73%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.12 104%
2.53 87%
2.062 107%
2.268 97%
2.57 86%
2.3 96%
CCT
6050 107%
8002 81%
7312 89%
7167 91%
6609 98%
6342 102%
6338 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
73.76
72.81
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.47
99.41
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / -7%
-8% / -5%
-99% / -70%
-0% / 2%
-5% / -15%
19% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

该显示器提供了良好的图片,具有良好的对比度和很低的黑值。不幸的是,出厂设置并不十分理想,因此可以观察到轻微的黄色色调。经过校准(表上面有相应的配置文件可供下载),肉眼应该不再能看到颜色偏差。

由于该显示器不是为专业用户设计的,它提供了足够的色彩再现,几乎百分之百地覆盖了sRGB色彩空间。

卡尔曼:灰度
卡尔曼:灰度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
卡尔曼:饱和度
卡尔曼:饱和度
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN:灰度(校准的)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
CalMAN: 饱和度(已校准)
97%的sRGB覆盖率
97%的sRGB覆盖率
DCI-P3的覆盖率为69%。
DCI-P3的覆盖率为69%。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在300cd/m²的情况下,Omen 16只应在紧急情况下在户外使用。尤其是游戏,因为颜色更不明显,所以不是很吸引人。但是,即使在阳光直射下,文本和简单的图形仍然清晰可见。哑光显示表面在此做出了贡献。相比之下,亮度在室内是绰绰有余的,特别是因为0.22cd/m²的极低黑值确保了高对比度。

阳光直射下的文本
阳光直射下的文本
背光下的图像
背光下的图像

IPS面板在通常的观察角度下是稳定的。即使在尖锐的角度也无法检测到颜色变化。然而,亮度从大约70°到80°明显下降,尽管这几乎不是一个实用的观看角度。

性能--惠普专注于动力

我们的惠普Omen 16中的AMD Ryzen 7 5800H和AMD Radeon RX 6600M,对于目前的游戏有足够的动力。16GB的内存几乎应该足够了,而且以后可以很容易地扩展。然而,当系统在QHD显示屏上以165帧的速度运行时,笔记本的极限得到了测试。另一方面,在许多游戏中,60帧似乎几乎可以毫不费力地实现。

为了尽可能拉伸这些极限,我们在Omen Gaming Hub中选择了 "性能 "选项,这使得处理器的供电量增加了近20%。

处理器

AMD Ryzen 7 5800H的耗电量几乎是无限的。在零点几秒的时间里,它可以消耗160W。在更长的时间里,134W是标准。例如,这两个数值都明显高于采用相同CPU的微星Alpha 15中的设置。

然而,无法确定更大的性能飞跃。至少,通常价格低廉的CPU可以与英特尔酷睿i7-11800或i7-12800H竞争,尽管是以牺牲效率为代价。在我们的基准测试中,增加功耗的效果并不明显。Omen 16在各种评级中大多处于中场,被竞争对手紧密包围。所有可以说的是,该处理器提供了它所能提供的一切。

真正引人注目的是Cinebench循环中的数值没有下降,这通常可以防止系统过热。惠普Omen 16只是将其通风量提升到最大,然后抵消了性能的任何下降。

Cinebench R15 multi sustained load

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1973 (1963.86-1985.21)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2055.92-2084.96)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2126 (2093.8-2147.31)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
83.1 pt ∼83%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
81 pt ∼81%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
79.1 pt ∼79%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
78.6 pt ∼79%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
76.3 pt ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
76.3 pt ∼76%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
75.6 pt ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
 
73.7 pt ∼74%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
68 pt ∼68%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12817 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11938 Points ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12738 Points ∼99% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12663 Points ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
12409 Points ∼97% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12083 Points ∼94% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4032 - 19282, n=155, last 2 years)
12045 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=24)
11930 Points ∼93% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10097 Points ∼79% -17%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
1511 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (778 - 1920, n=154, last 2 years)
1470 Points ∼97% +4%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1432 Points ∼95% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1427 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=24)
1410 Points ∼93% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1407 Points ∼93% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1374 Points ∼91% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1294 Points ∼86% -9%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4982 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4611 Points ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4946 Points ∼99% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4913 Points ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
4831 Points ∼97% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4663 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=26)
4617 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 7382, n=227, last 2 years)
4273 Points ∼86% -10%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4172 Points ∼84% -12%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
558 Points ∼95% +1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
558 Points ∼95% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼95% +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=25)
549 Points ∼94% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (300 - 736, n=227, last 2 years)
542 Points ∼93% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
529 Points ∼90% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
502 Points ∼86% -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
2147 (2093.8min - 2147.31max) Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2095 (2082.79min - 2095.01max) Points ∼98% +3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2093 (2069.32min - 2093.04max) Points ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2085 (2055.92min - 2084.96max) Points ∼97% +3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=23)
1990 Points ∼93% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1985 (1963.86min - 1985.21max) Points ∼92% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1982 (1952.36min - 1982.46max) Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2944, n=239, last 2 years)
1797 Points ∼84% -11%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
230 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
209 Points ∼90% -9%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=24)
229 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 277, n=229, last 2 years)
217 Points ∼94% -5%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 732, n=226, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * ∼100% -17%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
257 Seconds * ∼87% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=24)
257 Seconds * ∼87% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
256 Seconds * ∼87% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
255 Seconds * ∼86% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * ∼83% +3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * ∼85%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * ∼83% +3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
241 Seconds * ∼82% +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Seconds * ∼77% +10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58467 MIPS ∼100%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56716 MIPS ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56682 MIPS ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56187 MIPS ∼96%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56348 MIPS ∼96%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
54903 MIPS ∼94%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54228 MIPS ∼93%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (51114 - 59986, n=24)
52358 MIPS ∼90%
Average of class Gaming
  (21148 - 76063, n=226, last 2 years)
48605 MIPS ∼83%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0 MIPS ∼0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
5674 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS ∼99% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5575 MIPS ∼98% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5508 MIPS ∼97% +2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5502 MIPS ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5497 MIPS ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5038 MIPS ∼89% -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=24)
5481 MIPS ∼97% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (2743 - 6506, n=226, last 2 years)
5361 MIPS ∼94% -1%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
9261 Points ∼100% +26%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8389 Points ∼91% +15%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8266 Points ∼89% +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8244 Points ∼89% +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7993 Points ∼86% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 14294, n=219, last 2 years)
8162 Points ∼88% +11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7899 Points ∼85% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (7326 - 9062, n=23)
7821 Points ∼84% +7%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7392 Points ∼80% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points ∼79%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
1588 Points ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1501 Points ∼95% +12%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1492 Points ∼94% +12%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1472 Points ∼93% +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=23)
1447 Points ∼91% +8%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1436 Points ∼90% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1918, n=219, last 2 years)
1421 Points ∼89% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1393 Points ∼88% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1347 Points ∼85% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points ∼84%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
16.6 fps ∼100% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
16.1 fps ∼97% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps ∼89% -3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps ∼94% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps ∼92% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps ∼92%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps ∼91% -1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps ∼91% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=24)
14.7 fps ∼89% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.67 - 22, n=225, last 2 years)
13.5 fps ∼81% -11%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
99.9 s * ∼100% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.9 s * ∼57% +38%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=24)
66.3 s * ∼66% +28%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.7 s * ∼57% +39%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.4 s * ∼56% +39%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
55.9 s * ∼56% +39%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s * ∼54% +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=222, last 2 years)
53.1 s * ∼53% +42%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s * ∼46% +50%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.559 sec * ∼100% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * ∼94% -2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼99% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4218 - 1.088, n=222, last 2 years)
0.556 sec * ∼99% -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=23)
0.525 sec * ∼94% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.522 sec * ∼93% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.52 sec * ∼93% -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼93% -0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * ∼92%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼92% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2030 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
143 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.8 pt ∼98%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
96.9 pt ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95.1 pt ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
95 pt ∼95%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.5 pt ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
92.7 pt ∼93%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
89.4 pt ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
 
79.1 pt ∼79%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14805 KRay/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14349 KRay/s ∼97% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14775 KRay/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14725 KRay/s ∼99% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s ∼99%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14273 KRay/s ∼96% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14203 KRay/s ∼96% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (10349 - 15169, n=24)
14140 KRay/s ∼96% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=180, last 2 years)
11544 KRay/s ∼78% -21%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94920 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94497 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94054 Points ∼99% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89066 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points ∼97%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
89725 Points ∼95% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
89240 Points ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (63663 - 95954, n=24)
88499 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 110797, n=180, last 2 years)
62775 Points ∼66% -32%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3230 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3209 MB/s ∼99% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3048 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3164 MB/s ∼98% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s ∼97%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3049 MB/s ∼94% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3049 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (2096 - 3287, n=24)
3015 MB/s ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (833 - 4851, n=180, last 2 years)
2805 MB/s ∼87% -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97488 Points ∼98% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96679 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96626 Points ∼97% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (92948 - 99215, n=24)
96207 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
96014 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93649 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92948 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (30447 - 132615, n=180, last 2 years)
88751 Points ∼89% -11%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11821 Points ∼100% 0%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11782 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11722 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11629 Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (9962 - 11871, n=24)
11567 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11409 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11398 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (3007 - 17639, n=180, last 2 years)
9921 Points ∼84% -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52168 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52072 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
51892 Points ∼99% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
49017 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points ∼97%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
49254 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49016 Points ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (36083 - 52732, n=24)
48605 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 61370, n=180, last 2 years)
33892 Points ∼65% -33%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
125127 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
124083 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
119353 MB/s ∼95% -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s ∼99%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
121180 MB/s ∼97% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
119953 MB/s ∼96% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (50226 - 127832, n=24)
115036 MB/s ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 156370, n=180, last 2 years)
74705 MB/s ∼60% -40%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
50226 MB/s ∼40% -60%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
803 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
802 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
795 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
783 MB/s ∼97% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
789 MB/s ∼97% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
783 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (591 - 828, n=24)
780 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (305 - 1209, n=201, last 2 years)
668 MB/s ∼82% -18%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7871 KRay/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7826 KRay/s ∼99% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7644 KRay/s ∼97% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7488 KRay/s ∼95% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7526 KRay/s ∼96% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7469 KRay/s ∼95% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5457 - 7884, n=24)
7447 KRay/s ∼95% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=180, last 2 years)
6253 KRay/s ∼79% -18%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=180, last 2 years)
24077 MPixel/s ∼100% +21%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
20495 MPixel/s ∼85% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
20026 MPixel/s ∼83% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
19344 MPixel/s ∼80% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19952 MPixel/s ∼83% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s ∼83%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19901 MPixel/s ∼83% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (14445 - 25421, n=24)
17797 MPixel/s ∼74% -11%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14445 MPixel/s ∼60% -27%

系统性能

与其前身类似,考虑到直接的竞争,系统性能是令人信服的。考虑到测量中可能出现的波动,Omen 16与其竞争对手基本持平,并始终接近顶端。创建和编辑图像和视频的成绩甚至高于平均水平。配备NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060的型号在这里不能完全跟上。

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
7231 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (6875 - 7150, n=2)
7013 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
6875 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6717 Points ∼93% -6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
6703 Points ∼93% -6%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
6665 Points ∼92% -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=191, last 2 years)
6416 Points ∼89% -10%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10735 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (9907 - 10479, n=2)
10193 Points ∼95% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9943 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9907 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9905 Points ∼92% -5%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
9867 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=190, last 2 years)
9797 Points ∼91% -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9548 Points ∼89% -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (8922 - 9231, n=2)
9077 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
8935 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8923 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
8922 Points ∼97% -3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
8890 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8866 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
8798 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=190, last 2 years)
8614 Points ∼93% -7%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10700 Points ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (9977 - 10257, n=2)
10117 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9977 Points ∼93% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9715 Points ∼91% -5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9377 Points ∼88% -9%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
9161 Points ∼86% -11%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8660 Points ∼81% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=190, last 2 years)
8629 Points ∼81% -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=22, last 2 years)
1701 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1309 Points ∼77%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1302 - 1309, n=3)
1305 Points ∼77%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=22, last 2 years)
1657 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1285 Points ∼78%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1284 - 1285, n=3)
1285 Points ∼78%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=22, last 2 years)
1773 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1401 Points ∼79%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1384 - 1401, n=3)
1391 Points ∼78%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=22, last 2 years)
1644 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1129 Points ∼69%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1116 - 1136, n=3)
1127 Points ∼69%
PCMark 10 Score
7150 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=180, last 2 years)
41939 MB/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (34964 - 44180, n=24)
39751 MB/s ∼95% -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=180, last 2 years)
45768 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (39990 - 47260, n=24)
44954 MB/s ∼96% -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=180, last 2 years)
44175 MB/s ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s ∼93%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (28456 - 47022, n=24)
38054 MB/s ∼86% -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns * ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (76.3 - 105.1, n=24)
81.9 ns * ∼95% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (78.1 - 122, n=202, last 2 years)
62.4 ns * ∼72% +28%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

在播放4K视频时,只有三个跳帧是一个不错的结果。另一方面,测量的延迟显示,驱动程序的调整似乎并不理想。惠普Omen 16仅有不到2毫秒的延迟,在排名中处于领先地位,不幸的是这是最差的结果。但应该记住,其他可比的游戏笔记本在这一类别中也是没有说服力的。

4K的YouTube流媒体
4K的YouTube流媒体
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * ∼100%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
1550 μs * ∼74% +26%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1330 μs * ∼63% +37%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1161 μs * ∼55% +45%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1154 μs * ∼55% +45%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1010 μs * ∼48% +52%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
698 μs * ∼33% +67%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

安装的NVMe固态硬盘三星PM981a,像许多其他笔记本一样,能够充分展示其能力。几乎所有的记录值都高于平均水平,这也解释了为什么在我们的硬盘和固态硬盘的表格中,这种固态硬盘被发现在我们表格的顶部。

通过PCIe 4.0,这款固态硬盘的速度会更快,但AMD处理器不支持这种方式。主板上的连接本身甚至会有这种能力。但这个功能在这个系统的性能中并没有发挥重要作用。

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Sequential Read: 3148MB/s
Sequential Write: 2565MB/s
4K Read: 52.1MB/s
4K Write: 136.8MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1996MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1931MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.066ms
Access Time Write: 0.027ms
Score Read: 2363Points
Score Write: 2325Points
Score Total: 5866Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
94
67.6
-28%
70
-26%
66.5
-29%
87.6
-7%
18.2
-81%
54.7
-42%
83.3
-11%
86.1
-8%
AS SSD
-31%
-24%
-36%
-6%
-163%
-151%
-14%
-22%
Score Total
5866
3300
-44%
3394
-42%
3329
-43%
5503
-6%
910
-84%
3636
-38%
4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37)
-18%
4988 ?(910 - 9279, n=181, last 2 years)
-15%
Score Read
2363
1157
-51%
1612
-32%
1574
-33%
2017
-15%
389
-84%
1493
-37%
1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37)
-24%
1859 ?(389 - 3587, n=181, last 2 years)
-21%
Score Write
2325
1546
-34%
1007
-57%
1000
-57%
2452
5%
338
-85%
1397
-40%
2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37)
-8%
2193 ?(335 - 4414, n=181, last 2 years)
-6%
Seq Read
3148
2016
-36%
2589
-18%
2844
-10%
2383
-24%
925
-71%
2695
-14%
2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37)
-19%
3004 ?(252 - 6562, n=181, last 2 years)
-5%
Seq Write
2565
1830
-29%
1435
-44%
1779
-31%
2466
-4%
496
-81%
2384
-7%
2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37)
-19%
2358 ?(308 - 7663, n=181, last 2 years)
-8%
4K Read
52.1
55.2
6%
53.6
3%
42.9
-18%
44.14
-15%
19.99
-62%
29.75
-43%
53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37)
2%
54 ?(20 - 108, n=181, last 2 years)
4%
4K Write
136.8
127.7
-7%
154.2
13%
130.7
-4%
117.5
-14%
17.96
-87%
52
-62%
131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37)
-4%
146.2 ?(18 - 364, n=181, last 2 years)
7%
4K-64 Read
1996
901
-55%
1299
-35%
1246
-38%
1734
-13%
276.2
-86%
1193
-40%
1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37)
-26%
1505 ?(216 - 2959, n=181, last 2 years)
-25%
4K-64 Write
1931
1235
-36%
710
-63%
692
-64%
2088
8%
270.2
-86%
1107
-43%
1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37)
-7%
1820 ?(191.8 - 3859, n=181, last 2 years)
-6%
Access Time Read *
0.066
0.087
-32%
0.056
15%
0.089
-35%
0.049
26%
0.23
-248%
0.136
-106%
0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36)
24%
0.06528 ?(0.018 - 0.23, n=174, last 2 years)
1%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.032
-19%
0.027
-0%
0.043
-59%
0.032
-19%
0.249
-822%
0.36
-1233%
0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37)
-56%
0.07174 ?(0.012 - 0.588, n=181, last 2 years)
-166%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-30% / -30%
-25% / -24%
-33% / -35%
-7% / -7%
-122% / -156%
-97% / -142%
-13% / -14%
-15% / -21%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
HP Omen 16-c0077ng Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3535 (3326.44-3565.79)
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD: Ø1469 (269.9-1640.05)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW): Ø2984 (2805.94-2994.62)

GPU性能

AMD Radeon RX 6600M是入门级显卡之一,与NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060大致相当。AMD卡提供更大的视频内存,因此它应该能够在某种程度上更好地处理要求更高的标题。

然而,与处理器不同的是,Omen 16没有为GPU提供额外的电源,而只是提供最大115W的电源。在一些游戏笔记本电脑中,如Schenker XMG Apex 15,该卡由Nvidia提供最大130W的电源。

在电池模式下,惠普甚至将功耗限制在25W。如果没有永久性的电源,游戏只能在有限的范围内进行。

3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkFire Strike - 最大性能
3DMarkFire Strike - 最大性能
3DMarkFire Strike - 电池模式
3DMarkFire Strike - 电池模式
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
100 pt ∼100%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
98.9 pt ∼99%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
87.7 pt ∼88%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
 
87.5 pt ∼88%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
81.8 pt ∼82%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
80.6 pt ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
 
80.3 pt ∼80%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
76.2 pt ∼76%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
68.4 pt ∼68%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
36137 Points ∼100% +13%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34644 Points ∼96% +9%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
31859 Points ∼88%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (27030 - 31859, n=3)
30197 Points ∼84% -5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
30152 Points ∼83% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 45050, n=209, last 2 years)
28849 Points ∼80% -9%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
28599 Points ∼79% -10%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27030 Points ∼75% -15%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
25142 Points ∼70% -21%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
158182 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
144092 Points ∼91% +13%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (127549 - 155788, n=3)
142476 Points ∼90% +12%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
127549 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (23059 - 192950, n=175, last 2 years)
109117 Points ∼69% -14%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
97003 Points ∼61% -24%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
83364 Points ∼53% -35%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
83077 Points ∼53% -35%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
24460 Points ∼100%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24384 Points ∼100% 0%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (21876 - 24788, n=4)
23924 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
21876 Points ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
21828 Points ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=228, last 2 years)
21674 Points ∼89% -11%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
20712 Points ∼85% -15%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
18806 Points ∼77% -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10019 Points ∼100% +22%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8863 Points ∼88% +8%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8851 Points ∼88% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13455, n=230, last 2 years)
8381 Points ∼84% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8207 Points ∼82%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (7200 - 8234, n=4)
7870 Points ∼79% -4%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7450 Points ∼74% -9%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7200 Points ∼72% -12%
3DMark 11 Performance
25021 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
51430 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
21360 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8353 points
Help

游戏性能

关于可能的游戏的选择,几乎没有任何限制。目前的游戏即使在QHD分辨率下也能达到可观的帧率。特别是那些专门为广大观众编程的游戏,通常对系统性能要求较低。这里的图形性能对于从运动模拟到战斗游戏的三A级游戏来说,应该可以满足一段时间的需求。

在全高清情况下,即使选择了最高级别的细节,三位数的帧速率几乎总是可以实现的,以供应显示器的165赫兹的内容。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98.6 fps ∼100% +17%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.5 fps ∼88% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
86 fps ∼87% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
84 fps ∼85%
Average of class Gaming
  (30 - 128, n=226, last 2 years)
82.8 fps ∼84% -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (75.4 - 84, n=3)
80.2 fps ∼81% -5%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
77.4 (65min) fps ∼78% -8%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
75.4 (64min, 64.6P1) fps ∼76% -10%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70.9 (60min) fps ∼72% -16%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
192 (92.1min, 144P1) fps ∼100% +24%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
178 (45.3min, 135P1) fps ∼93% +15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
155 fps ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 221, n=139, last 2 years)
153.4 fps ∼80% -1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (138 - 155, n=4)