Notebookcheck Logo

Apple MacBook Air M2评测--更快的10核GPU并不值得购买

昂贵的空气必须提前节流。 在我们测试了基本型号之后,我们现在也拿到了配备16GB内存、1TB大固态硬盘和更快的10核GPU版本的新MacBook Air M2,并通过我们的测试。然而,显卡的更新特别令人失望,因为被动冷却的MacBook Air M2需要快速节流其性能。
ARM Apple Laptop / Notebook MacBook Thunderbolt Ultrabook

我们已经能够广泛地测试新的MacBook Air M2,现在我们的测试中有一个配备更快的10核GPU和更多存储的型号。这是星光色的配置,带有更快的M2芯片,16GB的共享工作内存,以及一个大的1TB SSD。在这次审查中,我们主要想集中讨论与基本型号的区别。对于其他部分,如外壳、设备、输入设备、显示器和扬声器,我们请你参考我们对基本版的评论,因为在这些方面没有差异。

我们已经知道,新的MacBook Air M2的价格已经明显提高。我们这里有一个装备精良的模型(建议零售价2,309欧元,约合2,380美元),你已经进入了一个 MacBook Pro 14的范围,它在许多方面(性能、Mini-LED显示屏、连接、扬声器)显然更有优势。配备16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘的MBP 14基本型号目前在市场上的售价约为1950至2000欧元(约合2,010-2,061美元),而配备1TB固态硬盘的型号售价约为2,300欧元(约合2,371美元),这与我们的Air M2测试单元的价格相同。当然,Air的目标受众不同,移动性更好,但我们也将Pro列入我们的比较图表中。

Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Processor
Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz, 20 W PL2 / Short Burst, 9 W PL1 / Sustained
Graphics adapter
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 13.5 W TDP
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5-6400, onboard
Display
13.60 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1664 pixel 225 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
Apple SSD AP1024Z, 1024 GB 
, 965 GB free
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 11.3 x 304.1 x 215
Battery
52.6 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Apple macOS 12 Monterey
Camera
Webcam: 1080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: quad speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 35W dual USB-C PSU, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.23 kg, Power Supply: 189 g
Price
2309 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
92 %
08/2022
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
1.2 kg11.3 mm13.60"2560x1664
92.3 %
07/2022
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2, M2 8-Core GPU
1.2 kg11.3 mm13.60"2560x1664
91.9 %
06/2022
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU
1.4 kg15.6 mm13.30"2560x1600
92.7 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
1.6 kg15.5 mm14.20"3024x1964
90.1 %
07/2022
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
1.1 kg14.9 mm13.30"2880x1800
86.9 %
07/2022
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg15.3 mm13.40"3840x2400

案例--星光色明显不容易受影响

随着新的 午夜色的MacBook Air M2我们确定,虽然深蓝色看起来非常好,但它也非常容易受到灰尘和指纹的影响。目前的测试设备也是新的星光色版本(银色,略带金色),在这些方面明显不容易受到影响,更符合已知的银色和太空灰的版本。

在我们对基本版本的评论中,我们已经提到,尽管新的MacBook Air M2非常苗条,但它仍然比直接竞争对手,如 戴尔XPS 13 Plus华硕ZenBook S 13.如果我们也把它与 MacBook Pro 14的对比,Pro主观上显得明显更笨重,当然也更厚,而且重了约400克(约0.9磅)。然而,就纯粹的占地面积而言,两者的差别并不是很大。

尺寸比较

312.6 mm 221.2 mm 15.5 mm 1.6 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 15.6 mm 1.4 kg304.1 mm 215 mm 11.3 mm 1.2 kg296.7 mm 210.5 mm 14.9 mm 1.1 kg295.3 mm 199 mm 15.3 mm 1.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

显示屏 - 一个没有时间抖动的IPS面板

我们请你参考我们的对基本版的评论了解有关显示的信息。在评论区,我们被问及时间性抖动(它被用来创造更多色彩深度的错觉)。因此,我们用显微镜检查了Air M2的IPS面板,并创建了一个每秒240张图像的慢动作记录。虽然我们能够检测到时间上的抖动,例如,在目前的 采用Mini-LED面板的MacBook Pro 16在一些特定的灰色色调中,这在旧的MacBook Air M1中并不存在。 MacBook Air M1和新的MacBook Air M2都没有这种情况。

性能 -Apple M2,有10个GPU核心

处理器

由于新MacBook Air的处理器模块无论配置如何始终保持不变(共有8个核心,由4个性能核心和4个效率核心组成),我们可以在这里简单介绍一下。性能基本上是相同的。在Cinebench循环中,我们看到基本型号在几次运行后有轻微的优势,在最后的运行中,高端Air的速度也是最小的。然而,这也可以用芯片本身的正常差异来解释。在实践中,这种差异是不明显的。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2: Ø994 (917.47-1212.01)
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2: Ø955 (863.48-1215.33)
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2 Apple M2: Ø1229 (1226.62-1232.55)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry Apple M1 Pro 8-Core; Rosetta 2: Ø1311 (1303.74-1319.74)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1607 (1576.98-1742.1)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Ultra-Performance: Ø1512 (1481.98-1677.36)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Optimized: Ø1066 (983.94-1625.95)

Apple 由于比M1处理器的时钟速度更高,因此能够提高单核和多核性能,但你也要为它付出更高的功耗。我们已经在另一篇文章中表明 另一篇文章因此,在处理器性能方面,M2也不像它的前辈那样高效运行。

然而,新的M2芯片总体上对日常工作产生的性能绰绰有余,即使与MacBook Air的被动冷却相结合。事实上,新的Air M2几乎能够与 8核M1 ProMacBook Pro 14,至少在简短的多核基准测试中,尽管Pro 14的性能仍然完全稳定,没有下降。

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
CPU Performance Rating
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
91.8 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
90.1 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry -3!
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
89.5 pt
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
87.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
73.8 pt
Average Apple M2
 
73 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
72.9 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
68.4 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points +23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years)
10289 Points +21%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
9743 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9581 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8745 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
8667 Points +2%
Average Apple M2
  (8517 - 8772, n=5)
8654 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
8517 Points
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1678 Points +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years)
1627 Points +3%
Average Apple M2
  (1580 - 1638, n=5)
1595 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
1585 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1581 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
1580 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1531 Points -3%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points -6%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points +76%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years)
3963 Points +72%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
3909 Points +70%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
2349 Points +2%
Average Apple M2
  (2231 - 2416, n=5)
2325 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
2306 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
2231 Points -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
648 Points +71%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years)
610 Points +61%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points +48%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
381 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
380 Points
Average Apple M2
  (216 - 446, n=5)
371 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
216 Points -43%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook
  (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years)
1757 Points +45%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points +44%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1677 (1481.98min - 1677.36max) Points +38%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1626 (983.94min - 1625.95max) Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1320 (1307min - 1320max) Points +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1229 (1226.62min, 1226.74P1 - 1232.55max) Points +1%
Average Apple M2
  (1210 - 1243, n=5)
1222 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
1215 (863min - 1215max) Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
1212 (917min - 1212max) Points
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
240 Points +8%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points +6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years)
237 Points +6%
Average Apple M2
  (222 - 229, n=5)
224 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
223 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
223 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
222 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
210 Points -6%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
713 Seconds * -16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
616.7 Seconds *
Average Apple M2
  (549 - 713, n=5)
614 Seconds * -0%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
595 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years)
386 Seconds * +37%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
319 Seconds * +48%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds * +50%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9942 Points +11%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
9817 Points +9%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years)
9084 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
8991 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
8962 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
8951 Points 0%
Average Apple M2
  (8491 - 8994, n=7)
8839 Points -2%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points -15%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2
1937 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2
1925 Points
Average Apple M2
  (1890 - 1953, n=7)
1918 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2
1914 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
1769 Points -8%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P
1723 Points -10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)
1701 Points -12%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points -21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1212 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
223 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
128.65 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.5 %
Help

系统性能

在主观性能方面,我们最初并没有注意到与MacBook Air M2基本款的任何区别。 基本型号的MacBook Air M2特别是在日常工作中,如写邮件、播放视频或上网冲浪。然而,在一些基准测试中,更大的存储空间和更快的SSD变得很明显。基本上,模拟程序通过Rosetta 2运行也没有任何问题,但是Apple 芯片的原生应用程序通常更快,资源效率更高。一个很好的例子是Adobe Photoshop和Premiere Pro应用程序,它们都可以接受英特尔版本的运行,但明显比原生应用程序慢。 因此,PugetBench的结果也只有有限的用途,但它们仍然显示出与MacBook Air M2的基本型号相比,增加的工作内存和更快的SSD的优势。

CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test: 12:1 8K Metal | 12:1 8K CPU
Photoshop PugetBench: Overall Score | GPU Score | General Score | Filter Score
Premiere Pro PugetBench: Overall Score 0.9 | Export 0.9 | Live Playback 0.9 | GPU 0.9
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Speedometer 2.0: Result
CrossMark / Overall
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1667 Points +11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years)
1553 Points +4%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1496 - 1585, n=6)
1538 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1507 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1501 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1496 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1490 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1481 Points -1%
CrossMark / Productivity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1575 Points +14%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years)
1507 Points +9%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1476 Points +7%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1377 - 1441, n=6)
1409 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1382 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1377 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1371 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1305 Points -5%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1915 Points +5%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1861 Points +2%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1777 - 1967, n=6)
1859 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1848 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1841 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1819 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years)
1690 Points -7%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1554 Points -15%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1418 Points +33%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years)
1329 Points +25%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1293 Points +21%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (1065 - 1182, n=6)
1137 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1069 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1065 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1055 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
1044 Points -2%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K Metal
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
133 fps +66%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
85 fps +6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
80 fps
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
75 fps -6%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (59 - 85, n=6, last 2 years)
72 fps -10%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (59 - 85, n=4)
70.8 fps -11%
Blackmagic RAW Speed Test / 12:1 8K CPU
Average of class Subnotebook
  (24 - 32, n=6, last 2 years)
26.8 fps +12%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (24 - 26, n=4)
24.8 fps +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
24 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
24 fps 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
24 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
21 fps -12%
Photoshop PugetBench / Overall Score
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
828 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
806 Points -3%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (747 - 828, n=3)
794 Points -4%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (648 - 828, n=4, last 2 years)
757 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
667 Points -19%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
648 Points -22%
Photoshop PugetBench / GPU Score
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
83.8 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
81.9 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (75.6 - 83.8, n=3)
80.4 Points -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (70.2 - 83.8, n=4, last 2 years)
77.9 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
75.9 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
70.2 Points -14%
Photoshop PugetBench / General Score
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (78.7 - 86.6, n=3)
81.5 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
79.3 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
78.7 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (61.6 - 86.6, n=4, last 2 years)
76.6 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
68.5 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
61.6 Points -22%
Photoshop PugetBench / Filter Score
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
86.9 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
81.9 Points -6%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (62.8 - 86.9, n=3)
77.2 Points -11%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (62.8 - 86.9, n=4, last 2 years)
74.9 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
68 Points -22%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
64.8 Points -25%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Overall Score 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
837 Points +67%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
537 Points +7%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (500 - 537, n=2)
519 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
500 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (335 - 537, n=3, last 2 years)
457 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
335 Points -33%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Export 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
48 Points +6%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (45.4 - 48, n=2)
46.7 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
45.4 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (41.5 - 48, n=3, last 2 years)
45 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
41.5 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
38.9 Points -14%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / Live Playback 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
177.7 Points +124%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
81.8 Points +3%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (79.5 - 81.8, n=2)
80.7 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
79.5 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (39 - 81.8, n=3, last 2 years)
66.8 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
39 Points -51%
Premiere Pro PugetBench / GPU 0.9
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
31.6 Points +31%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
26.2 Points +8%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (24.2 - 26.2, n=2)
25.2 Points +4%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
24.2 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (22.2 - 26.2, n=3, last 2 years)
24.2 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
22.2 Points -8%
Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook
  (166.4 - 478, n=38, last 2 years)
263 Points +16%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
239.8 Points +6%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (220 - 239, n=6)
230 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
227.4 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
226.8 Points
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
225.9 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
207.9 Points -8%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
379 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
377 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
375 Points
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (342 - 387, n=6)
368 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
343 Points -9%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
288 Points -23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years)
284 Points -24%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
270 Points -28%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
248 Points +10%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years)
240 Points +7%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (223 - 256, n=5)
237 Points +5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
226 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
225 Points
Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
406.6 runs/min +4%
Average Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (363 - 428, n=6)
398 runs/min +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
392 runs/min
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
386 runs/min -2%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (176 - 674, n=27, last 2 years)
324 runs/min -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
262 runs/min -33%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
204 runs/min -48%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
176 runs/min -55%

存储解决方案

无定形磁盘标记
无定形磁盘标记

在所有关于新的MacBook型号的256-GB固态硬盘的讨论之后,MacBook Air M2中的1-TB SD再次达到了超过3GB/s的通常传输率。然而,即使是这样也不是目前的技术水平,因为尽管1-TB SSD的溢价很高,达到460欧元(约474美元),但它仍然使用过时的PCIe 3.0连接。更大的MacBook Pro 14在这里有明显的优势,因为它已经使用更快的PCIe 4.0型号。

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
100 pt
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
 
70.2 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
59.9 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple SSD AP1024Z
59.5 pt
Average of class Subnotebook
 
56 pt
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
32.1 pt
Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB Read
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
5448 MB/s +95%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
  (2797 - 4860, n=5)
3240 MB/s +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2819.3 MB/s +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple SSD AP1024Z
2796.5 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1476 - 2948, n=6, last 2 years)
2632 MB/s -6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1475.8 MB/s -47%
5GB Write
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple SSD AP0512
4463 MB/s +48%
Average Apple SSD AP1024Z
  (2873 - 6126, n=5)
3609 MB/s +20%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple SSD AP1024Z
3036.1 MB/s +1%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple SSD AP1024Z
3017.3 MB/s
Average of class Subnotebook
  (1653 - 3243, n=6, last 2 years)
2840 MB/s -6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple SSD AP0256Z
1652.8 MB/s -45%

图形卡

除了内核数量之外,新的GPU没有任何区别。 Apple M2Apple ,因为8核的基本型号和更快的10核版本的核心都达到了1,398 MHz的最高时钟速度。与旧版M1相比,M2的图形性能总体上得到了改善,与CPU核心相比,Apple ,成功地略微提高了提高了效率这里。

然而,在13.5瓦左右,功耗总体上仍然略有增加。这导致在恒定负载下,例如在游戏过程中,图形性能必须比基本型号的情况更快、更强地降低。其结果是,与M2的8核GPU相比,几分钟后,优势从19%缩减到只有约9%

野生动物极端压力测试(MBA M2 10C GPU)。
野生动物极端压力测试(MBA M2 10C GPU)。
野生动物极端压力测试(MBA M2 8C GPU)。
野生动物极端压力测试(MBA M2 8C GPU)。

因此,只有在短期的基准测试中才会有真正的优势。在日常操作中,8核GPU已经绰绰有余。因此,没有真正的理由要为10核GPU支付额外的费用。 10核GPU在新的MacBook Air M2中。然而,我们也想与更大的MacBook Pro 14做一个简单的比较 MacBook Pro 14这里,即使是 14核GPU的基本型号也至少快30-40%,而且在这个性能水平上也保持不变。

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9267 Points +36%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6824 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6823 Points 0%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (5328 - 6987, n=6)
6623 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
5689 Points -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2438 - 9340, n=24, last 2 years)
5503 Points -19%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4081 Points -40%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3793 Points -44%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
9089 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6772 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6728 Points -1%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (5137 - 6982, n=6)
6557 Points -3%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
5673 Points -16%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (2001 - 9404, n=13, last 2 years)
4789 Points -29%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
4057 Points -40%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3827 Points -43%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
24885 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
24875 Points 0%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (21302 - 25317, n=4)
24095 Points -3%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (14403 - 24885, n=4, last 2 years)
21293 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
21009 Points -16%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
14403 Points -42%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
48.6 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (35.6 - 48.6, n=5)
45.6 fps -6%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
39.8 fps -18%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (12 - 52.6, n=9, last 2 years)
39.5 fps -19%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
147 fps +34%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
110 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
109.8 fps 0%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (77 - 110, n=6)
100.4 fps -9%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
91 fps -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (31 - 120, n=10, last 2 years)
89.5 fps -19%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.8 fps -57%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
316 fps +40%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
229.9 fps +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
226 fps
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (136 - 232, n=6)
202 fps -11%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
199.9 fps -12%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (79 - 260, n=9, last 2 years)
185.1 fps -18%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
109.3 fps -52%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
394 fps +33%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
296 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
295 fps 0%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (241 - 296, n=6)
282 fps -5%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
247 fps -17%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (85 - 331, n=10, last 2 years)
243 fps -18%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
120 fps -59%
Geekbench 5.5
Metal Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
37319 Points +23%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (26079 - 34823, n=6, last 2 years)
31015 Points +2%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (30149 - 33465, n=5)
30921 Points +2%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30269 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30166 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
26079 Points -14%
OpenCL Score
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
35173 Points +28%
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
31996 Points +16%
Average Apple M2 10-Core GPU
  (27489 - 27965, n=4)
27688 Points +1%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27602 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27489 Points
Average of class Subnotebook
  (10477 - 61067, n=66, last 2 years)
23958 Points -13%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2 8-Core GPU, Apple M2
23633 Points -14%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
20364 Points -26%
low med. high ultra
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) 60 28 25 21
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) 88.6 46.3 26.3 15.9
Borderlands 3 (2019) 53.1 34.2 23.8 16.4

排放和电源管理

噪声排放

当然,更昂贵的MacBook Air M2也是被动冷却的,所以它在运行过程中保持完全安静。我们也无法检测到任何其他电子噪音。

温度

由于两款机型的被动冷却系统是相同的,所以在表面温度方面也没有实际差异。反正在日常操作中没有任何问题,即使在高负荷下,Apple ,也能很好地控制机箱温度,所以你仍然可以将MacBook Air M2放在腿上运行而没有任何担心。

Max. Load
 43.5 °C44.7 °C39.5 °C 
 40.4 °C40.7 °C36.2 °C 
 34.9 °C31.3 °C33.3 °C 
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 38.3 °C
41.5 °C44.6 °C42.8 °C
38.7 °C41.7 °C40.2 °C
33.6 °C35.1 °C34.6 °C
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 39.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  44.1 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.1 °C / 95.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-6.8 °C / -12.3 F).
表面温度-顶部(压力测试)
表面温度-顶部(压力测试)
表面温度-底部(压力测试)
表面温度-底部(压力测试)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
Apple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
3%
1%
3%
-12%
-7%
Maximum Upper Side *
44.7
44.5
-0%
45.1
-1%
46.8
-5%
47.9
-7%
41.1
8%
Maximum Bottom *
44.6
44.4
-0%
43
4%
40.9
8%
56.1
-26%
48.8
-9%
Idle Upper Side *
25.1
23.9
5%
25.2
-0%
24.2
4%
26.8
-7%
28
-12%
Idle Bottom *
25.3
23.6
7%
25.4
-0%
24.2
4%
27.3
-8%
29.3
-16%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在我们的压力测试中,我们看到基本上与基本模型中的行为相同。在开始时,M2被允许短暂地消耗约33瓦,然后消耗迅速下降,最后也较快地平息在一个略低的封装功率,不到9瓦。这在下面的图表中也很容易看到,该图表将我们压力测试中的两款MacBook Air M2的封装功率、CPU功率和GPU功率进行了相互比较。

051015202530Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test Package Power: Ø10.4 (8.57-33.115)
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test Package Power: Ø11.7 (8.755-31.792)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4.04 (3.269-17.596)
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4.94 (3.508-18.952)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø4.28 (3.27-13.289)
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø4.93 (3.505-11.119)

然而,这里也有一种情况,即性能完全可以满足日常任务的需要,MacBook Air M2根本不是为持续负载而设计的。那些想要不断获取M2的全部性能的人将无法避免主动冷却的 MacBook Pro 13 M2.

最初的压力测试
最初的压力测试
最后的压力测试
最后的压力测试

发言人

我们在基本型号的测试中已经看到,MacBook Air M2的新的扬声器系统再次非常好,但与之前的相比,并不代表明显的改进。 MacBook Air M1.这款 MacBook Pro 14带附加模块的MacBook Pro 14在这里再次表现得更好,只有更大的MacBook Pro 16才超过它。 MacBook Pro 16.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.828.52528.427.53122.324.34027.9315022.128.86321.524.78018.132.710016.950.712518.556.91601851.920016.456.925015.56031514.365.340012.968.650012.270.963011.969.280011.567.1100011.868.2125011.167.9160011.369.3200011.571250011.671.6315012.172.4400012.671.9500012.471.6630012.972.1800013.169.41000012.771.71250012.872.11600013.660.8SPL24.482.7N0.658.3median 12.7median 69.2Delta1.34.730.235.431.734.925.834.932.236.927.535.924.544.323.154.723.365.121.966.320.164.521.566.818.869.817.671.914.972.613.770.91473.611.273.711.171.610.772.312.272.411.273.511.674.511.775.7127312.273.812.469.712.568.212.667.112.563.911.968.524.884.90.668.3median 12.5median 71.62.42.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

消耗功率

在我们的测量中,在空闲运行期间,更昂贵的MacBook Air M2版本比基本版本的耗电量略高。在这里,芯片之间的差异可能发挥了作用,但我们的测试装置也有更多的存储/RAM模块,也需要电源。一旦你在MacBook上施加更重的负载,你将再次清楚地看到35瓦的充电器是限制因素。使用100瓦的充电器,我们能够看到最大功耗略高于55瓦,之后也有一段时间是~38瓦。

最大功率消耗高于55瓦
最大功率消耗高于55瓦
新的35瓦充电器并不比普通的30瓦型号大。
新的35瓦充电器并不比普通的30瓦型号大。

在更昂贵的MacBook Air M2型号中,还包括新的双USB-C充电器。这对大多数用户来说应该是完全足够的,而且第二个USB-C连接在许多情况下也会有帮助。作为选择(没有额外费用),你也可以切换到更强大的67瓦充电器,这尤其对充电时间有积极影响,因为新的MacBook Air M2届时也将支持更快的充电。

Charging time with the device on, idle, Wi-Fi on, brightness 150 cd/m²
30% 50% 80% 90% 100%
30瓦的充电器 41分钟 69分钟 111分钟 126分钟 147分钟
35瓦的充电器 34分钟 57分钟 92分钟 108分钟 122分钟
100瓦的充电器 17分钟 28分钟 51分钟 66分钟 85分钟
Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.16 / 0.32 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.9 / 9.6 / 9.7 Watt
Load midlight 32.4 / 35.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, M1 Pro 8-Core, Apple SSD AP0512
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Power Consumption
8%
-2%
-55%
-44%
-87%
Idle Minimum *
1.9
1.87
2%
1.77
7%
2.9
-53%
4.8
-153%
7
-268%
Idle Average *
9.6
9.2
4%
6.7
30%
11.6
-21%
8.7
9%
11
-15%
Idle Maximum *
9.7
9.3
4%
6.9
29%
11.9
-23%
10.1
-4%
11.4
-18%
Load Average *
32.4
28.5
12%
30.9
5%
49.5
-53%
45.6
-41%
59.7
-84%
Witcher 3 ultra *
30.8
27.4
11%
38.9
-26%
58.2
-89%
42.4
-38%
49.4
-60%
Load Maximum *
35.7
31
13%
56
-57%
68.5
-92%
49.5
-39%
63
-76%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

05101520253035Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø30.8 (23.2-35.2)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø30.5 (23.7-35.8)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

051015202530Tooltip
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø9.13 (8.7-10.1)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø24.9 (22.3-29.1)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø22.8 (17-32.9)
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.13 (2.1-2.28)

电池寿命

由于功耗略高,测量的电池寿命也比基本型号的情况略差。然而,如果将显示亮度调整到150cd/m²,在WLAN测试和播放视频时的运行时间仍然非常好。在全亮度下,电池寿命明显缩短。

MacBook Pro 14在这里又很有趣,因为尽管在150cd/m²的情况下运行时间缩短了一小时,但当MacBook Pro 14调整到全SDR亮度时(与新的MacBook Air M2的亮度相当),其持续时间甚至略长。虽然新的Air M2在WLAN测试中没有完全持续6小时,但MacBook Pro 14能够持续6.5小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 15.6)
14h 44min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 15.6)
5h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
15h 46min
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry
M2, M2 8-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2022 M2
M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 58.2 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 M1 Pro Entry
M1 Pro 8-Core, M1 Pro 14-Core GPU, 69.9 Wh
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 67 Wh
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K
i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh
Average of class Subnotebook
 
Battery Runtime
4%
26%
-7%
-21%
-42%
-23%
H.264
946
989
5%
1153
22%
900
-5%
912
-4%
657
-31%
WiFi v1.3
884
910
3%
1144
29%
816
-8%
550
-38%
414
-53%

Pros

+ 纤细、高质量的外壳
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 无声运行
+ 采用p3和无pwm的更明亮的显示屏
+ 非常好的扬声器
+ 在150尼特条件下电池寿命长
+ 良好的系统性能
+ 磁性安全系统

Cons

- 既没有Thunderbolt 4,也没有Wi-Fi 6,频率为160 MHz,只支持单一外部显示器
- 效率低于M1 SoC
- 只有PCIe 3.0 SSD
- 充电器太弱
- 高负载下性能显著下降
- 入门级价格高,升级费用昂贵

结论 - 升级后的MacBook Air M2太贵了

Apple MacBook Air M2的评论。测试装置由 德国提供。Apple
Apple MacBook Air M2的评论。测试装置由 德国提供。Apple

在我们已经测试了 基本版的新MacBook Air M2广泛,现在的升级只能在有限的程度上给我们留下深刻印象。由于新的256-GB驱动器的速度问题,特别是更大更快的固态硬盘对消费者来说可能最有意义。然而,我们仍然要对Apple ,这是一个PCIe 3.0的连接,而不是更快的PCIe 4.0驱动器,尽管有高昂的额外费用。此外,我们认为1499欧元(约1545美元)的基本版本应该已经配备了512GB的固态硬盘。升级到更多的工作内存可能也是有意义的,特别是如果你经常使用第三方软件(如谷歌浏览器,有一堆打开的标签)或仿真软件。

另一方面,在我们看来,更快的GPU是完全没有意义的。在功能上,与基本型号没有区别,而且几分钟后性能优势已经大大缩水,因此在游戏时,例如,与8核GPU相比已经没有明显优势。虽然在短期基准测试中存在约20%的优势,但这在实践中并没有多大的区别,因为更快的GPU由于更高的功耗也必须更快地节流。那些想持续利用M2的全部图形性能的人,不得不选择 MacBook Pro 13 M2配备主动冷却装置。

新款MacBook Air M2中更快的10核GPU的额外溢价并不值得。即使内存和固态硬盘的升级非常昂贵,因为这是典型的Apple ,尤其是固态硬盘升级到至少512GB,绝对值得推荐。如果你随后也升级工作内存,你最终会进入明显更强大和装备更好的MacBook Pro 14的价格范围。

然而,新的MacBook Air M2在升级后最大的问题是价格,因为目前MacBook Air M2的价格略高于配备类似设备的 MacBook Pro 14(起价约为1,950欧元(约合2,010美元),配备16GB内存和512GB固态硬盘),尽管它具有许多优势(更多的连接,明显更高的性能,具有高HDR亮度的Mini-LED面板,更好的扬声器)。新款Air M2的占地面积并没有小多少(新款Air也是由 华硕ZenBook S 13戴尔XPS 13 Plus这里的竞争对手)。唯一两个真正的优势是外壳明显更薄,重量也轻了约400克(约0.9磅)。因此,那些不一定需要最轻的MacBook,并愿意支付约2000欧元(约合人民币2061元)的人,也许更适合使用MacBook Pro 14。

但所有这些都不能改变一个事实,即更昂贵的MacBook Air M2版本在日常操作中也非常好用,而且也只是一个非常好的副笔记本。虽然你肯定可以就性价比进行辩论,但这在设备质量的评估中并没有起到任何作用。

价格和可用性

MacBook Air M2可以在Apple Store进行配置。并有1199美元起的价格。我们的测试配置为1,899美元。 亚马逊也列出了一个1499美元的版本。

Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU - 08/11/2022 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
89 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
61 / 75 → 82%
Weight
72 / 20-75 → 95%
Battery
90%
Display
92%
Games Performance
68 / 78 → 87%
Application Performance
91 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
89 / 91 → 98%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
82%
92%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple MacBook Air M2评测--更快的10核GPU并不值得购买
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-08-13 (Update: 2022-08-13)