Notebookcheck Logo

华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版评测。7的支持下的AMD笔记本

马拉松奇迹。 华硕TUF Gaming A16不仅包含一个CPU，还包含一个来自当前AMD一代的GPU。在我们的评论中找出升级是否值得或性能提升是否不足。
AMD Gaming Laptop / Notebook Radeon Ryzen (Zen)
华硕TUF游戏机A16

不出所料，全新的TUF Gaming A16将有几个型号。根据不同的型号，一个Ryzen 7 7735HS或 Ryzen 9 7940HS作为CPU，而无论是一个 Radeon RX 7600S或 Radeon RX 7700S被用作显卡。与过去一样，S表示适度的功耗。16英寸显示屏也继续存在：要么是FHD+面板（1920x1200），165赫兹和100% sRGB覆盖，要么是QHD+面板（2560x1600），240赫兹和100% DCI-P3覆盖。根据华硕网站，DDR5内存范围为8至32GB，存储容量为512GB至2TB。

我们的评测设备是便宜的版本之一，配备了Ryzen 7 7735HS、Radeon RX 7600S、FHD+面板、16GB内存和1TB SSD。

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (TUF Gaming A16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS 8 x 3.2 - 4.8 GHz, 114 W PL2 / Short Burst, 105 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-HS Refresh
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 7600S - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1865 MHz, 95 W TDP, GDDR6, Adrenalin 22.40.01.11, MUX-Switch
Memory
16 GB 
, 2x 8 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-4800 Dual-Channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, FreeSync Premium, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, 1024 GB 
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2-2280-slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC256 @ AMD K19.4
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 Combo (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 355 x 252
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 240 W Power Supply, Armoury Crate, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.188 kg, Power Supply: 532 g
Links
Asus homepage
Asus notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.2 %
02/2023
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S		2.2 kg27 mm16.00"1920x1200
86.9 %
09/2022
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"3840x2400
87.2 %
03/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		2.1 kg24.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.4 %
10/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S		1.7 kg19.5 mm14.00"2560x1600
89.3 %
01/2023
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S		2.2 kg16.9 mm16.00"2560x1600

案例

外壳得到了一个好的分数。华硕选择了塑料（基本单元）和金属（盖板）的组合，以及一个体面的材料强度/厚度。机箱只有在重压下才会有明显的屈服。与其他设备相比，盖子也相当抗扭，尽管指纹很快就会在金属盖上聚集。

至于设计，华硕在微妙和俏皮之间成功地做出了妥协。虽然深色的颜色相当朴素，但制造商对一些细节（电源按钮、功能灯、盖子的形状）却很有创意。在我们的评测样品中，所有的设计元素都非常干净地组合在一起。

华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16

A16不一定是最轻和最紧凑的游戏笔记本之一。在2.2公斤的重量下，这款16英寸的笔记本在适合频繁旅行方面受到限制，但大多数竞争设备在这里有可比性的数值。高度也是一个类似的故事，最大为2.7厘米。

尺寸比较

❌
355 mm 252 mm 27 mm 2.2 kg354.9 mm 251.9 mm 24.95 mm 2.1 kg358 mm 252 mm 19.8 mm 2.3 kg357.7 mm 260 mm 16.9 mm 2.2 kg312 mm 227 mm 19.5 mm 1.7 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备

连接性

根据华硕的主页，端口的范围因型号不同而不同。例如，USB 4端口不是标准配置，而是只安装在更好或更昂贵的型号中。我们的评测设备不得不使用两个USB-A 3.2 Gen1端口和两个USB-C 3.2 Gen2端口（后者支持DisplayPort）。一个积极的方面。其中一个Type-C端口可以实现高达100瓦的电力传输。A16还有一个HDMI 2.1输出，一个RJ45端口，一个音频插孔和一个用于Kensington锁的开口。只缺少一个读卡器。

连接的分布更多是为右手设计的。由于许多端口放在左边，在左边使用鼠标可能会导致限制。

左侧：电源、RJ45网络、HDMI 2.1、2个USB-C 3.2 Gen2（包括显示端口）、USB-A 3.2 Gen1、音频
左侧：电源、RJ45网络、HDMI 2.1、2个USB-C 3.2 Gen2（包括显示端口）、USB-A 3.2 Gen1、音频
右侧。USB-A 3.2 Gen1，Kensington锁
右侧。USB-A 3.2 Gen1，Kensington锁

沟通

在WLAN性能方面，这款笔记本电脑以高达900MBit/s的发送和接收速率位居中场，我们在距离我们的新华硕Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器一米处测量了这一数据。尽管Zephyrus G14采用了类似的联发科芯片，但这一点显然被Zephyrus G14超越了。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1769 (1729min - 1795max) MBit/s +97%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s +56%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
899 (755min - 936max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (104.2 - 968, n=16)
800 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s +40%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
MediaTek MT7921
908 (806min - 973max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (47.8 - 985, n=16)
820 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1445 (1383min - 1538max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (90 - 972, n=16)
628 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AX12
Average of class Gaming
  (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)
1139 MBit/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1045 (936min - 1115max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (548 - 985, n=16)
797 MBit/s
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø908 (806-973)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø898 (755-936)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1768 (1729-1795)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1383-1538)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1045 (936-1115)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头的性能也很一般。与大多数笔记本一样，它缺乏图像清晰度和色彩准确性。

ColorChecker
13.4 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
13 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617: 12 ∆E min: 6.47 - max: 16.89 ∆E

辅料

我们的评测样品所包含的唯一附件是一些信息手册。240瓦的电源装置重量刚刚超过500克，尺寸约为16 x 7.5 x 2厘米，所以它既不小也不特别笨重。

维护

要进入TUF Gaming A16的内部，必须从底部卸下10多颗十字螺丝。然后，整个底板可以用很大的力气从其锚定处撬开。几乎所有组件都可以看到，而固态硬盘和内存模块则隐藏在塑料薄膜后面（见照片）。

华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16

担保

在德国，保修期超过24个月。这在其他国家可能有所不同，所以买家应在购买前与卖家仔细核实。

输入设备

键盘

华硕可以稍微改进一下键盘。虽然键盘总体上是一个体面的数字，但仔细检查后会发现一些弱点和不一致的地方。从打字的感觉开始，在压力点和行程方面感觉有点松软。我们希望这里的反馈更清晰或更硬。

布局也是值得商榷的。除了F键之外，方向箭头也非常小。笔者认为，一些功能（如回车/退车）被合并在一起的事实是不方便的。此外，字迹相对较弱，因此可以分几步调整的白色背光在白天也应该保持激活状态。完整的数字键盘和四个特殊键，包括音量控制，应该被视为加分项。

华硕TUF游戏机A16
华硕TUF游戏机A16

触摸板

触摸板几乎在所有方面都令人印象深刻。除了它的尺寸（约13 x 7.5厘米），它的滑行特性也很令人满意。由于表面光滑，可以实现极快的输入。触摸板的精确性和干净的手势支持也得到了进一步的赞扬。然而，底部的点击按钮并不十分完美。这些按钮可以更稳定一些，不那么摇摇欲坠。

显示

TUF Gaming A16提供一个16:10格式的哑光16英寸显示屏。我们的评测模型采用了165赫兹的面板，分辨率为1,920 x 1,200。

294
cd/m²		296
cd/m²		298
cd/m²
298
cd/m²		308
cd/m²		301
cd/m²
277
cd/m²		286
cd/m²		282
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 293.3 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 308 cd/m²
Contrast: 1339:1 (Black: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.02
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.228
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16.00		HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Samsung SDC4174, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00		Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
TL156VDXP0101, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60		Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
BOEhydis NE140QDM-NX1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00		Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
23%
-3%
21%
1%
Display P3 Coverage
69.4
99.3
43%
66.4
-4%
97.6
41%
69.8
1%
sRGB Coverage
97.8
100
2%
97
-1%
99.9
2%
98.1
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.9
88
24%
68.5
-3%
85.6
21%
71.9
1%
Response Times
85%
20%
46%
7%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
17 ?(8, 9)
2 ?(1, 1)
88%
5.6 ?(3.2, 2.4)
67%
8.3 ?(3.5, 4.8)
51%
10 ?(4.8, 5.2)
41%
Response Time Black / White *
10.1 ?(5.4, 4.7)
1.9 ?(0.8, 1.1)
81%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
-27%
6 ?(1.8, 4.2)
41%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
-27%
PWM Frequency
240.4 ?(100)
26191 ?(35)
Screen
-6%
-3%
-20%
1%
Brightness middle
308
328.8
7%
353.7
15%
500
62%
492.4
60%
Brightness
293
332
13%
340
16%
470
60%
471
61%
Brightness Distribution
90
97
8%
89
-1%
85
-6%
90
0%
Black Level *
0.23
0.34
-48%
0.42
-83%
0.4
-74%
Contrast
1339
1040
-22%
1190
-11%
1231
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.47
1.53
-4%
1.74
-18%
2.45
-67%
1.9
-29%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.98
6.04
-103%
3.63
-22%
5.34
-79%
3.81
-28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.02
0.5
51%
1.2
-18%
0.99
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.3
41%
2.1
5%
3.1
-41%
1.7
23%
Gamma
2.228 99%
2.18 101%
2.3 96%
2.213 99%
2.36 93%
CCT
6228 104%
6362 102%
6257 104%
7251 90%
6497 100%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
34% / 18%
5% / 1%
16% / -2%
3% / 2%

* ... smaller is better

如果你不考虑糟糕的亮度（平均只有293cd/m²），IPS屏幕几乎没有显示任何弱点。0.23cd/m²的黑值应该能满足大多数买家的要求，对比度超过1,300:1也应如此。此外，响应时间（黑到白10毫秒，灰到灰17毫秒）也不错，而且良好的色彩再现不需要校准。

卡尔曼：灰阶
卡尔曼：灰阶
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
卡尔曼：色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN：灰度（已校准）。
CalMAN：灰度（已校准）。
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）。
CalMAN：色彩饱和度（已校准）。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

对于色彩空间，我们的测量设备记录了98%的sRGB，71%的AdobeRGB和69%的P3--对于一个游戏笔记本来说是可用的数值。视角符合典型的IPS标准，所以它们相当好，即使是从陡峭的角度。

华硕TUF Gaming A16与sRGB对比
华硕TUF Gaming A16与sRGB对比
华硕TUF Gaming A16 VS AdobeRGB
华硕TUF Gaming A16 VS AdobeRGB
华硕TUF Gaming A16 VS P3
华硕TUF Gaming A16 VS P3

对于户外使用，更高的亮度水平将是可取的。此外，我们的评测设备在底部边缘有光晕（只有在深色内容中可见）。

背光照明
背光照明
子像素网格
子像素网格
视角稳定
视角稳定

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.4 ms rise
↘ 4.7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8 ms rise
↘ 9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

业绩

在设备方面，TUF Gaming A16属于中端产品。希望多年来以最大细节进行游戏的热情玩家应该到其他地方去寻找更强大的硬件。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

测试条件

在预装的Armory Crate中可以选择各种性能配置和GPU模式，由于功能众多，有时会出现过载和混乱。除非另有说明，我们所有的测试都是在性能 模式下进行的，GPU模式设置为标准。虽然Turbo 模式会多出几个百分点（注意Cinebench循环和3DMark分数），但这是以不成比例的高噪音水平为代价的。

军械库板条箱
军械库板条箱
静音模式 性能模式 涡轮模式
CPU PL1 75瓦 105瓦 120瓦
CPU PL2 90瓦 114瓦 144瓦

处理器

Ryzen 7 7735HS是一款配备16MB L3缓存的八核处理器，通过6纳米工艺制造，通过SMT可以并行处理多达16个线程。基本时钟为3.2 GHz，在负载下可能达到4.75 GHz。TDP的范围是35至54瓦，取决于笔记本的情况。由于图形切换，TUF A16可以在dGPU和Radeon 680M之间自动切换。Radeon 680M集成在处理器中，这对于要求不高的游戏来说绝对是足够的。

在Cinebench R15的长期测试中，Ryzen 7 7735HS提供了令人满意的稳定性能值，没有下降，这也适用于大多数竞争对手。其速度始终与联想Legion S7（R9 6900HX）和惠普Envy 16（Core i7-12700H）相当。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2250 (2235.89-2298.72)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode) AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2318 (2250.73-2354.6)
HP Envy 16 h0112nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2325 (2293.84-2590.34)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS: Ø1945 (1933.96-1986.89)
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2304 (2277.39-2359.33)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
82 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
76.5 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
69.7 pt
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
69.3 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
65.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
 
62.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
59.1 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=232, last 2 years)
19581 Points +40%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
17713 (16651.9min - 17712.9max) Points +27%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14584 (14179.8min - 14584.2max) Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
13995 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
13094 (11750.2min - 13094.1max) Points -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (11072 - 14131, n=11)
13062 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
11992 Points -14%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=230, last 2 years)
1816 Points +16%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1772 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
1771 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1614 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1561 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1288 - 1570, n=11)
1525 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
1455 Points -7%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=230, last 2 years)
7442 Points +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
6754 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5596 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5441 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (4339 - 5502, n=11)
5067 Points -7%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5053 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
4634 Points -15%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=230, last 2 years)
699 Points +14%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
630 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
612 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (502 - 613, n=11)
595 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
570 Points -7%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3101 Points +35%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
2735 (2614.89min - 2735.42max) Points +19%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
2590 (2293.84min - 2590.34max) Points +13%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2359 (2277.39min - 2359.33max) Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
2299 (2235.89min - 2298.72max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1795 - 2355, n=13)
2164 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
1987 (1933.96min - 1986.89max) Points -14%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
268 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
257 Points +4%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
253 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
248 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (206 - 255, n=12)
245 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
234 Points -6%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
258 Seconds * -15%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
249 Seconds * -11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (219 - 279, n=11)
240 Seconds * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
225 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
214 Seconds * +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
198.9 Seconds * +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
182 Seconds * +19%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=229, last 2 years)
77274 MIPS +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
67160 MIPS +10%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
63347 MIPS +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
61292 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (48327 - 63214, n=11)
58608 MIPS -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
56170 MIPS -8%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
54715 MIPS -11%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=229, last 2 years)
6133 MIPS +6%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
6070 MIPS +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
5779 MIPS
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5706 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (4779 - 5849, n=11)
5665 MIPS -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
5495 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
5381 MIPS -7%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years)
13627 Points +39%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
12640 Points +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
12358 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10007 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
9836 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (7368 - 10126, n=11)
9316 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
9298 Points -5%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=234, last 2 years)
1811 Points +15%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1773 Points +13%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
1751 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1642 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
1574 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1327 - 1615, n=11)
1538 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
1492 Points -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=232, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +22%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.5 fps +17%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18.3 fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
17.5 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (12.7 - 17.7, n=11)
16.2 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
15.1 fps -14%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.9 fps -15%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
59.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
55 s * +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (44.3 - 63.8, n=11)
53 s * +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
49.9 s * +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
49.1 s * +17%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
48.9 s * +17%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
45.3 s * +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS
0.512 sec * -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (0.4822 - 0.585, n=11)
0.506 sec * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
0.5 sec *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=229, last 2 years)
0.4687 sec * +6%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4655 sec * +7%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4636 sec * +7%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4586 sec * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15192
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
6340
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
41586
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
26.32 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.92 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2299 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
220 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
248 Points
Help
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
94.5 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
90.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.1 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
 
80.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
78.6 pt
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
70.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=225, last 2 years)
18634 KRay/s +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
16661 KRay/s
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
15934 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (12718 - 17161, n=12)
15178 KRay/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
13411 KRay/s -20%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11996 KRay/s -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9486 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
103791 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
101275 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (81722 - 105483, n=12)
94941 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=225, last 2 years)
93571 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
86254 Points -15%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
60379 Points -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41434 Points -59%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=225, last 2 years)
4332 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
3579 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
3494 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3288 MB/s -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (2818 - 3494, n=12)
3223 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
2953 MB/s -15%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2847 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=225, last 2 years)
109573 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
107544 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
104709 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
101825 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
100537 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (90101 - 108729, n=12)
100503 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99267 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
12977 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
12691 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (11441 - 13097, n=12)
12470 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=225, last 2 years)
12203 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
12044 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9852 Points -22%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8137 Points -36%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
56836 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55209 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (44756 - 58232, n=12)
52136 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=225, last 2 years)
47882 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
47307 Points -14%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
29979 Points -46%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26379 Points -52%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
137177 MB/s +112%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
120077 MB/s +86%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=225, last 2 years)
107712 MB/s +66%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
106504 MB/s +65%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (49927 - 137629, n=12)
85928 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66712 MB/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
64725 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=225, last 2 years)
1213 MB/s +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1164 MB/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
883 MB/s
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
870 MB/s -1%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
807 MB/s -9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (651 - 906, n=12)
800 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
760 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=225, last 2 years)
10089 KRay/s +13%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
8965 KRay/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
8923 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (1459 - 9094, n=12)
7474 KRay/s -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
7183 KRay/s -20%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6418 KRay/s -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5486 KRay/s -39%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
37404 MPixel/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=226, last 2 years)
36818 MPixel/s +32%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
33509 MPixel/s +20%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
28697 MPixel/s +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
27871 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (19153 - 30542, n=12)
27676 MPixel/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
27474 MPixel/s -1%

系统性能

在系统测试中，Gaming A16在比较领域中排在最后一名（仅次于Zephyrus G14），但在PCMark 10中的7332分仍然是一个好成绩。有点恼人的是，在交付状态下，系统在打开程序时有时会冻结或挂起几秒钟。这是由于Armoury Crate软件中的Smart Access Graphic选项造成的，它负责GPU的切换。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7669 Points +5%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7595 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
7426 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
7345 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
7332 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
7332 Points 0%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
12144 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
10712 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10622 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
10622 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10499 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
10149 Points -4%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
9876 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
9429 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
9332 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
9332 Points 0%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9224 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9070 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
11672 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
11572 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
11237 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
10790 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
10790 Points 0%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10617 Points -2%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1826 Points
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1722 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1728 Points
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1681 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2016 Points
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1828 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1599 Points
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1549 Points
PCMark 10 Score
7332 points
Help
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=225, last 2 years)
59453 MB/s +22%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56883 MB/s +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
53661 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
48817 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
48549 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (30324 - 52012, n=12)
48183 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
48013 MB/s -1%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
66192 MB/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=225, last 2 years)
63375 MB/s +26%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59205 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
50420 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
50377 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
50338 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (33938 - 51856, n=12)
48330 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=225, last 2 years)
61670 MB/s +12%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58969 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
58758 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
55107 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
55012 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
54997 MB/s 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (33175 - 55284, n=12)
52586 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
91.7 ns * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S
90.2 ns * -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
  (78.2 - 109.7, n=12)
88.5 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=222, last 2 years)
87.3 ns * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S
84.6 ns *
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
84.1 ns * +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

尽管到目前为止，延迟是测试领域中最好的，但LatencyMon工具预见了在实时处理音频内容或类似内容时可能出现的问题，这应该只影响一小部分买家。

延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1111.5 μs * -367%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
942.5 μs * -296%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
889.1 μs * -274%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
719 μs * -202%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
237.9 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

华硕为我们的评测配置提供了一个基于M.2的1TB SSD。这块NVMe硬盘为PCIe标准提供了坚实的性能，连续读取速度接近4000MB/s，连续写入速度约3000MB/s（AS SSD基准）。一个好处是：箱子里还有一个M.2插槽是空的。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4630 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3428 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 519 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 253.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2597 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3099 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.44 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 166.1 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
88 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
83.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
75.2 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
73.2 pt
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
70.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
69.3 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
 
63.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3596 (3543.98min - 3596.34max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s +44%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3337 (3241.38min - 3336.82max) MB/s +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2460 (2456.1min - 2460.17max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2383 (2361.29min - 2382.94max) MB/s -3%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1870 - 2660, n=10)
2264 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2083 (2073.03min - 2082.92max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3835 (3803.76min - 3834.73max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)
3829 MB/s +28%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3337 (3241.38min - 3337.44max) MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3237 (949.8min - 3236.98max) MB/s +8%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2991 (2932.66min - 2991.48max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2894 (2651.7min - 2893.78max) MB/s -3%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2166 - 3141, n=10)
2737 MB/s -8%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
7123 (6733.33min - 7122.99max) MB/s +54%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6593 (5975.42min - 6593.24max) MB/s +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)
6390 MB/s +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
4633 (4029.05min - 4633.45max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (4239 - 5055, n=10)
4594 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3563 (3320.84min - 3562.65max) MB/s -23%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3554 (3284.35min - 3554.02max) MB/s -23%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6188 (6162.53min - 6187.64max) MB/s +81%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4991 (4646.87min - 4990.59max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)
4818 MB/s +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3415 (3353.98min - 3415.42max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (2884 - 3635, n=10)
3338 MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3287 (3261.26min - 3287.42max) MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2869 (2667.88min - 2869.19max) MB/s -16%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
69.4 (68.09min - 69.4max) MB/s +95%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s +91%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
66.2 (64.89min - 66.16max) MB/s +86%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
59.7 (59.49min - 59.72max) MB/s +68%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
49 (47.57min - 48.98max) MB/s +38%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
35.5 (35.31min - 35.47max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (14.6 - 37.7, n=10)
32.3 MB/s -9%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
225 (223.07min - 224.58max) MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +24%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (84.9 - 286, n=10)
214 MB/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
211 (210.13min - 210.73max) MB/s +16%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
194 (190.1min - 194.04max) MB/s +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
181.3 (175.93min - 181.25max) MB/s
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
143.6 (143.02min - 143.57max) MB/s -21%
4k q32 t16 read
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)
2590 MB/s +28%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2217 (2210.73min - 2217.07max) MB/s +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2025 (1213.07min - 2024.78max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1846 (1840.32min - 1845.53max) MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1529 (1514.72min - 1528.96max) MB/s -24%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (283 - 2850, n=10)
1472 MB/s -27%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1310 (1228.8min - 1310.37max) MB/s -35%
4k q32 t16 write
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2314 (2299.73min - 2313.93max) MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2291 (2256.15min - 2290.93max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2074 (162.35min - 2073.69max) MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (222 - 2635, n=10)
1500 MB/s -35%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
592 (584.52min - 591.69max) MB/s -74%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
546 (534.95min - 545.61max) MB/s -76%
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
7311 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6843 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
6640 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6117 Points +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
5903 Points
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
5456 Points -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (3295 - 6406, n=10)
5026 Points -15%
Score Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2687 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2508 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2348 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2291 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1970 Points -16%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (787 - 2482, n=10)
1885 Points -20%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1653 Points -30%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3748 Points +56%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3248 Points +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3120 Points +30%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3011 Points +25%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2660 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
2404 Points
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1456 - 2796, n=10)
2234 Points -7%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
5177.64 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4963 MB/s +25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3976.53 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (3616 - 4177, n=10)
3881 MB/s -2%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3716.29 MB/s -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3013 MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2999.71 MB/s -25%
Seq Write
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)
3673 MB/s +22%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3327.08 MB/s +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
3020.8 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2927.58 MB/s -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2768 MB/s -8%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (1946 - 3177, n=10)
2671 MB/s -12%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2419.13 MB/s -20%
4K Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
73.57 MB/s +49%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
66.9 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)
66.9 MB/s +36%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
61.23 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
59.83 MB/s +21%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (37.9 - 58.8, n=10)
52.2 MB/s +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
49.25 MB/s
4K Write
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (152.2 - 288, n=10)
221 MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
194.83 MB/s +28%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
194.68 MB/s +27%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
189.48 MB/s +24%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
184.8 MB/s +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
152.75 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2313.48 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)
1939 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1923 MB/s +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1901.41 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (349 - 2005, n=10)
1444 MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
1392.07 MB/s -27%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1220.1 MB/s -36%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
3226.15 MB/s +66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2760.09 MB/s +42%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2574.57 MB/s +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)
2544 MB/s +31%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2198 MB/s +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1949.13 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (954 - 2255, n=10)
1751 MB/s -10%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
0.075 ms * -50%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.022 - 0.116, n=10)
0.0632 ms * -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)
0.05343 ms * -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.05 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.03 ms * +40%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.03 ms * +40%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.024 ms * +52%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
0.169 ms * -61%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
  (0.091 - 0.136, n=10)
0.1052 ms * -0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
0.105 ms *
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.081 ms * +23%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.061 ms * +42%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
0.06 ms * +43%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)
0.04639 ms * +56%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0235470705940117514101645188021152350258528203055329035253760399542304465Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617: Ø4593 (4015.9-4669.31)

图形卡

华硕安装了一个中端GPU以配合中端CPU。Radeon RX 7600S提供1,792个着色器单元，游戏时钟为1,865 MHz。8GB GDDR6显存只有128位，按照今天的标准，这有点紧张。

RX 7600S在基准图表中表现得足够好。在3DMarks中，该显卡与旧的RX 6800S大致处于同一水平（但有更好的光线追踪性能）。具有相同的TGP的RTX 3060偶尔会有很大的表现。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
96.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode)
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
82.2 pt
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
 
80.6 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
79.2 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
79.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
74.9 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
74.6 pt
HP Envy 16 h0112nr -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
60.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40487 Points +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode)
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
35278 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
35198 Points +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (33037 - 35278, n=4)
34188 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
33988 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
32662 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30772 Points -9%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
26862 Points -21%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode)
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
164406 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
159767 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (150582 - 164406, n=3)
156931 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
153853 Points +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
150582 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
121675 Points -19%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
81209 Points -46%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=236, last 2 years)
29457 Points +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode)
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
25900 Points +2%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (25514 - 26154, n=3)
25856 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
25625 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
25514 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
24135 Points -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
22915 Points -10%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18797 Points -26%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12066 Points +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode)
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
9208 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9174 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (9080 - 9208, n=3)
9164 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
9080 Points
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
8820 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
8316 Points -8%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7708 Points -15%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=155, last 2 years)
7720 Points +70%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
5350 Points +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (Turbo Mode)
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
4600 Points +1%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (4535 - 4655, n=3)
4597 Points +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S
4535 Points
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S
3979 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
AMD Radeon RX 6700S
3803 Points -16%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
46893 points
3DMark Vantage P Result
79339 points
3DMark 11 Performance
26235 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
233845 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59913 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
22642 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9261 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Gaming
  (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)
275 Seconds * -272%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
75 Seconds * -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
74 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
74 Seconds * -0%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
462 Seconds * -23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
376 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
361 Seconds * +4%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (301 - 376, n=2)
339 Seconds * +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=199, last 2 years)
315 Seconds * +16%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

游戏基准测试并没有呈现出统一的画面。有时RX 7600S的表现略低于GeForce RTX 3060的水平，有时略高于此。与合成基准类似，RX 7600S几乎没有区别于其RX 6700S和RX 6800S的前辈，这对于一个新的模型系列来说有点令人失望（更深入的比较，见我们的 游戏列表.)

尽管如此，TUF Gaming A16的速度足以以60 FPS以上的速度运行几乎所有的FHD游戏。该显卡还将合理地适用于QHD显示器，帧率为40以上。只有在4K范围内，RX 7600S才会迅速耗尽动力。在这里，如果选择最大设置，目前的标题很少超过40 FPS。

Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 v4.00 | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
96.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM -1!
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
88.2 pt
HP Envy 16 h0112nr -1!
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
83.4 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
76 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 -1!
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
72.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ -1!
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
67.7 pt
The Witcher 3 v4.00 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
103.1 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 150, n=16, last 2 years)
87.4 fps -15%
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +29%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
91.5 (87min) fps +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
91 (77min) fps
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
90.7 (86min) fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
84.3 (69min) fps -7%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
82.8 (78min) fps -9%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=218, last 2 years)
107.4 fps +26%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
103.3 (8.55min, 71.4P1) fps +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
97.9 (4.48min, 62.5P1) fps +15%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
88.7 (8min, 62.5P1) fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
85.5 (3.46min, 62.5P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
81.3 (9.16min, 55.6P1) fps -5%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=228, last 2 years)
111.4 fps +42%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
91.9 fps +18%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
87.6 fps +12%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
83.9 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
78.6 fps +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
78.2 fps
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=226, last 2 years)
207 fps +27%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
171.1 (119.3min, 125.3P1) fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
162.7 (111.4min, 120.7P1) fps
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
160 (75.9min, 121P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
157.3 (108.2min, 113.2P1) fps -3%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
140.4 (96.1min, 105.2P1) fps -14%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
148 (129.6min) fps +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=238, last 2 years)
142.8 fps +30%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
139 (117.8min) fps +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
110 (85.8min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
103 (86.9min) fps -6%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
99.4 (82.9min) fps -10%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
107 fps +95%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
103 fps +87%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=243, last 2 years)
102 fps +85%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
55 fps
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
52.3 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
45.2 fps -18%
The Witcher 3 v4.00
1920x1080 High Preset / On AA:FX
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
129.5 (27.8min, 79P0.1, 106.3P1) fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
129.5 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.1 - 173, n=14, last 2 years)
89.5 fps -31%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset / On AA:FX
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
103.1 fps
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  ()
103.1 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 150, n=16, last 2 years)
87.4 fps -15%
The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=166, last 2 years)
220 fps +45%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
186.8 (175min) fps +23%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
164 (156min) fps +8%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
161.2 (152min) fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (152 - 166.5, n=2)
159.3 fps +5%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
152 (134min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
144 (124min) fps -5%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=226, last 2 years)
117.1 fps +29%
Average AMD Radeon RX 7600S
  (91 - 98.1, n=2)
94.6 fps +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
91.5 (87min) fps +1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS
91 (77min) fps
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX
90.7 (86min) fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
Radeon RX 6700S, R7 6800HS
84.3 (69min) fps -7%
HP Envy 16 h0112nr
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
82.8 (78min) fps -9%

在我们用60分钟的测试中 TheWitcher 3,如我们的图表所示，除了轻微的波动之外，性能方面没有任何异常（例如帧率下降）。然而，AMD仍然需要调整驱动程序：在测试中出现了一两次崩溃。 F1 22通常在启动时崩溃并有错误信息。

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
HP Envy 16 h0112nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; The Witcher 3: Ø78.7 (69-84)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU; The Witcher 3: Ø84.6 (73-90)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S; The Witcher 3: Ø71.5 (62-85)
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S; The Witcher 3: Ø84.2 (65-100)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S; The Witcher 3 v4.00: Ø109.4 (99-115)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 169 154.1 85.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 186.7 152 91
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 131.4 112.5 110
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 103.4 78.2
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 68.2 55
Far Cry 5 (2018) 102 99 96
Strange Brigade (2018) 227 190 162.7
Outriders (2021) 115.2 103.2 89.1 59.7 32.9
Resident Evil Village (2021) 165.4 159.1 141.5 92.3 45.7
Days Gone (2021) 131.3 111.7 79.9 56.5 30.6
Deathloop (2021) 112.1 93.2 69.4 48.7 23
Back 4 Blood (2021) 186.9 155.2 146 94.7 48.4
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 110 108 102 75 42
Riders Republic (2021) 91 87 83 68 35
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 163.8 139.5 125.5 110.3 68.6
Halo Infinite (2021) 101.3 83.7 79.6 59.5 34.1
God of War (2022) 93.7 80.9 57.7 45.8 28
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 156 154 125 76 37
Dying Light 2 (2022) 79.1 65.7 43.2 20.8
Elden Ring (2022) 59.7 59.6 59.5 58.2 34.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 103 84 69.7 42.9 18.4
Elex 2 (2022) 111.7 100.3 86.7 59.9 31.3
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 125.1 122.7 115.3 75.4 35.8
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) 177.6 169.4 147.4 104.1 51.7
F1 22 (2022) 0 () 0 () 0 () 0 () 0 ()
The Quarry (2022) 95 77.9 57.1 37.9 12.8
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 53.7 46 39.7 28.2 15.2
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 75 68.6 65.9 47.4 17.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 135 99 94 65 37
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 96 86.7 79.8 55.9 30
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 79.4 48.6 48.4 35.6 20.9
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 103.6 81.8 66.5 51.1 29.9
High On Life (2023) 138.7 103.7 80.5 49.1 21
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 156.7 129.5 103.1 69.3 36.3
Dead Space Remake (2023) 62.2 52.6 52.3 34.8 11.3

排放

噪声

对于一个中端游戏机来说，A16在负载下变得相当响亮。在Witcher 3 测试和满负荷的情况下，我们检测到16英寸处理器在没有耳机的情况下发出了非常明显的、令人讨厌的50 dB(A)的声音。在空闲模式和简单的活动中，如办公应用、视频播放和网上冲浪，风扇是舒适的抑制。在正常情况下，笔记本是无声的。如果你想让它在任何情况下都尽可能地安静，只需激活静音 模式。

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 25 / 28 dB(A)
Load
42 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204440.739.436.942.5254139.738.835.843.33152.749.346.645.646.14032.63130.52831.65027.32829.629.528.56327.32824.127.128.58022.518.820.117.533.410018.917.314.314.223.912521.528.715.114.524.916023.723.91615.527.820026.725.321.618.530.125036.318.617.115.932.131523.915.413.511.530.840026.920.511.6113350032.920.21110.135.763030.215.510.810.538.180031.216.710.510.137.8100031.414.71110.538.1125032.815.710.710.840.1160033.916.711.210.842.9200031.413.811.511.338.7250029.414.511.711.737.6315029.316.512.612.139.6400027.613.812.812.636.4500030.216.313.112.738.1630025.614.613.512.938.7800019.914.113.413.134.61000017.613.71312.829.71250015.313.212.912.525.2160001512.912.911.821.9SPL42.328.324.624.150.5N4.11.10.60.57.4median 27.6median 15.7median 12.9median 12.1median 35.7Delta5.431.51.25.1hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S		HP Envy 16 h0112nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S		Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
Noise
1%
1%
0%
8%
off / environment *
24
22.8
5%
23.2
3%
25
-4%
23.1
4%
Idle Minimum *
24
22.9
5%
23.6
2%
25
-4%
23.1
4%
Idle Average *
25
22.9
8%
23.6
6%
26
-4%
23.1
8%
Idle Maximum *
28
30.5
-9%
25.4
9%
29
-4%
23.1
17%
Load Average *
42
41.4
1%
38
10%
45
-7%
31.4
25%
Witcher 3 ultra *
50
51.1
-2%
54.1
-8%
43
14%
51.4
-3%
Load Maximum *
50
51.4
-3%
57.2
-14%
45
10%
51.2
-2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

除了噪音之外，温度的发展也相当高。即使在空闲模式下，机箱在某些地方也会升温到40℃，这是测试领域的最高值。任何长时间将笔记本放在腿上的人都不会对A16感到满意。在负载情况下，上侧的温度也比同类平均水平高，最高为54℃。

Max. Load
 53 °C54 °C47 °C 
 41 °C49 °C47 °C 
 35 °C36 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 54 °C
Average: 43.7 °C
47 °C45 °C47 °C
34 °C33 °C34 °C
27 °C30 °C26 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  52 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.7 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S		HP Envy 16 h0112nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S		Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S
Heat
14%
5%
2%
18%
Maximum Upper Side *
54
45.2
16%
44.4
18%
53
2%
46.6
14%
Maximum Bottom *
47
44
6%
48.8
-4%
54
-15%
50.8
-8%
Idle Upper Side *
40
33.6
16%
37.8
5%
34
15%
26.4
34%
Idle Bottom *
40
32.6
18%
39.6
1%
38
5%
27.2
32%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

这也难怪，因为这些组件在负载下达到了很高的温度。在使用Furmark和Prime95进行60分钟的压力测试后，处理器升温到90℃以上（GPU：约80℃）。在TheWitcher 3 中，Ryzen 7 7735HS只保持在80℃左右的轻微温度（GPU也是约80℃）。

压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
压力测试
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

发言人

扬声器充其量是平庸的。我们的音频分析发现弱点主要在低音的强度上--大多数笔记本在这方面没有更好的表现。至少82dB(A)的最大音量是相当高的。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.242.22537.239.83147.447.94032.137.45040.640.36326.430.38024.635.610026.135.812523.142.516023.946.920022.952.425021.861.431514.961.54001265.750012.670.463013.373.680012.971.5100010.872.3125010.672.1160010.371200010.471250011.164.5315011.670.1400012.274.9500012.166.3630012.958800012.557.41000012.2541250011.846.31600011.145.7SPL2582.4N0.753.3median 12.2median 64.5Delta2.9936.634.836.627.928.227.923.924.223.923.222.923.222.522.122.525.927.625.930.521.330.535.619.135.638.318.138.34312.74347.114.447.154.715.154.759.716.559.762.414.362.466.512.966.568.210.968.268.89.868.863.89.963.862.41062.465.110.465.165.710.765.760.111.160.16511.46569.111.569.160.711.460.756.311.756.355.312.255.354.812.254.858.312.158.359.311.359.376.723.676.739.30.539.3median 60.1median 11.7median 60.171.97hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus TUF Gaming A16 FA617Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 59% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理

消耗功率

在积极的一面，A16在功耗方面从竞争中脱颖而出。如果你把所有的数值加在一起，这款16英寸的产品在某种程度上比其同类产品更经济。就所提供的性能而言，8至16瓦的空闲消耗和97至168瓦的负载消耗是可以接受的。240瓦的电源（更强大的配置为280瓦）是绰绰有余的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8 / 11 / 16 Watt
Load midlight 97 / 168 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S		HP Envy 16 h0112nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU		Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S		Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S		Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-21%
-17%
-30%
-16%
-56%
Idle Minimum *
8
10
-25%
6.3
21%
12
-50%
8.8
-10%
13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years)
-73%
Idle Average *
11
10.9
1%
9.8
11%
18
-64%
14.7
-34%
19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years)
-75%
Idle Maximum *
16
27.8
-74%
26.5
-66%
26
-63%
19.8
-24%
27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years)
-69%
Load Average *
97
116.4
-20%
103.8
-7%
88
9%
85.3
12%
111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years)
-15%
Witcher 3 ultra *
161.5
133.7
17%
189
-17%
157.7
2%
167.5
-4%
Load Maximum *
168
209.8
-25%
241.9
-44%
194
-15%
230.7
-37%
251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years)
-49%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø161.5 (157.8-165)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø163.1 (162-164.4)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.9 (7.44-15.3)

Power Consumption with an External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø98.3 (95.4-101.5)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø105.6 (99.2-114.6)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø157.1 (154.6-160)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø149.7 (145.7-154.4)
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø17.3 (11.5-24.2)

电池寿命

TUF Gaming A16的最大亮点是充足的电池寿命。得益于强大的90Wh电池，这款16英寸的笔记本在理想条件下（无负载，最低显示亮度）可以持续20小时，这是测试领域的最佳价值。在现实情况下，如在中等亮度下通过WLAN上网，笔记本可以持续12小时左右--也是非常值得称赞的（在静音 模式下的测量）。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
20h 12min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 04min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 30min
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617
R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh		HP Envy 16 h0112nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh		Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh		Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402RJ
R7 6800HS, Radeon RX 6700S, 76 Wh		Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7
R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S, 71 Wh		Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-14%
-37%
-15%
-48%
-37%
Reader / Idle
1212
1068
-12%
947
-22%
544 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)
-55%
WiFi v1.3
724
472
-35%
285
-61%
612
-15%
374
-48%
368 ?(57 - 745, n=181, last 2 years)
-49%
Load
90
94
4%
66
-27%
84.2 ?(36 - 173, n=143, last 2 years)
-6%

Pros

+ 通过USB-C提供电源（100W）
+ 极长的电池寿命
+ 一流的触摸板
+ 良好的165赫兹显示屏
+ 免费的M.2插槽

Cons

- 高温和噪音的发展
- 海绵状的键盘反馈
- 声音可以更好
- WLAN性能差
- 糟糕的网络摄像头

判决书

华硕TUF Gaming A16 FA617：评测设备由德国华硕提供
华硕TUF Gaming A16 FA617：评测设备由德国华硕提供

如果3D操作中陡峭的温度和噪音发展不会困扰你，TUF Gaming A16 FA617是一款成功的中端游戏笔记本。

的 Ryzen 7 7735HS和 Radeon RX 7600S在我们的审查配置中，为1920x1200的原生分辨率提供了足够的动力，即使是在现代的标题中。16英寸的屏幕提供了良好的对比度，干净的颜色和坚实的响应时间，尽管亮度可以更好一点。

该机箱在外观上不显眼，拥有相当好的连接性和一个伟大的触摸板。键盘的反馈有点松动，华硕应该在未来加以改进。声音和网络摄像头也可以做一些优化。

电池寿命（长达20小时）是一个绝对的卖点。几乎没有任何其他游戏笔记本能达到如此高的效果。

总的来说，这款笔记本电脑足够好，可以获得86%的评分。作为替代品，读者应该考虑16英寸的 Legion S7配有 Ryzen 9 6900HX和一个 Radeon RX 6800S，取得了89%的略高评价。同时，英特尔和Nvidia的粉丝可以去买 TUF Gaming F15与它的 酷睿i7-12700H和 GeForce RTX 3060或类似的笔记本（尽管RTX 3060的继任者已经在地平线上）。

价格和可用性

华硕TUF游戏机A16优势版FA617似乎还没有在美国或其他地方销售。有兴趣的买家应定期通过华硕的官方网站检查供应情况的变化。

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 - 02/13/2023 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
79 / 98 → 81%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
62 / 80 → 77%
Weight
62 / 10-66 → 93%
Battery
89 / 95 → 94%
Display
88%
Games Performance
97%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
81 / 95 → 85%
Noise
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
73%
Camera
40 / 85 → 47%
Average
78%
86%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕TUF Gaming A16优势版评测。7的支持下的AMD笔记本
Florian Glaser, 2023-02-14 (Update: 2023-02-14)