结论 - M5 Pro 与 MacBook Pro 16 完美契合
新的Apple M5 Pro SoC 非常适合 MacBook Pro 16，因为它可以充分发挥芯片的性能，而不会出现节流现象。与之前的 M4 Pro 芯片相比，我们看到了明显的性能优势（CPU 约占 20%，GPU 占 30-50%），Apple ，还包括 Wi-Fi 7 和速度更快的 PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘。与我们之前的 M4 Pro 评测机相比，电池运行时间稍短，但额外的 RAM 很可能也会增加功耗。
其他方面保持不变，这意味着你可以获得 Thunderbolt 5 端口，但读卡器仍然不支持 SD Express。Mini-LED 面板仍然是最好的面板之一，可选的哑光表面也是它优于大多数竞争对手的一大优势；只有联想在 ThinkPad T1g 中提供了哑光 Tandem-OLED 面板。 ThinkPad T1g.在大多数情况下，MacBook 也能保持安静。
价格仍然很高，尤其是在增加升级的情况下。配备 RTX 5070 的 Windows 笔记本电脑的 GPU 性能更高，尽管 MacBook 显然没有 8GB VRAM 的限制，这对于创意工作流程来说是一大优势。附带的 140W PSU 也不够用，尽管这个问题没有 M5 Max 机型那么严重，我们将在即将发布的 MacBook Pro 14 M5 Max 的评测中。.
总之，有了全新的 M5 Pro 芯片和 Wi-Fi 7 以及 PCIe 5.0 等新功能，MacBook Pro 16 变得更加出色。
Pros
Cons
Apple 推出配备全新 M5 Pro SoC 的升级版 MacBook Pro 16。基本型号售价 2699 美元，容量为 24 GB，现在的存储容量是以前的两倍，达到 1 TB，速度也比以前更快（PCIe 5.0）。此外，还配备了 Wi-Fi 7。我们的评测机型有一些价格不菲的升级（哑光纳米纹理显示屏、64 GB 内存、4 TB SSD 存储），因此价格增至 4449 美元。
规格
与 MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro 相比的变化
Apple 机箱没有改变，其中包括连接（3x Thunderbolt 5）以及 1200 万像素中心舞台网络摄像头、输入设备和 Mini-LED 面板。请参阅 我们对 M4 Pro MacBook Pro 16 的全面评测了解有关这些主题的更多信息。维护选项仍然仅限于风扇和电池，而其他所有组件都是焊接的。
SD 卡读卡器也保持不变，这意味着 UHS 标准的性能良好，但不支持最新的 SD Express 标准。新的Apple N1 芯片提供 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 6，在我们的测试中传输速率非常高且稳定。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (ADATA SD8.0 Express 512 GBAV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21.1 - 531, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (ADATA SD8.0 Express 512 GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 1455, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性
性能 - M5 Pro 和 PCIe 5.0
全新 MacBook Pro 16 始终配备最快的 M5 Pro芯片，拥有 18 个 CPU 内核和 20 个 GPU 内核。此外，你还能获得至少 24GB LPDDR5x-9600 内存和 1 TB 更快的 PCIe 5.0 存储空间。
测试条件
MacBook Pro 提供三种不同的性能模式：默认的自动模式、低功耗模式和高功率模式。只有在高功率模式下，CPU 才能发挥最大性能，而 GPU 和游戏性能则没有差别。我们使用高功率模式进行基准测试，以显示 M5 Pro 的最大性能潜力。在电池供电模式下，所有三种模式的性能数据相同。
| CPU (瓦特) | CB2024 Multi (分) |
GPU (瓦特) | Steel Nomad (分) |
赛博朋克 2077 1080p Ultra (fps) |
TDP 压力测试 CPU&GPU (瓦特) |
最大风扇噪音 (dB(A)) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低功耗 | 12 | 853 | 8 | 1266 | 31.1 | 10 | 听不清 (1400 rpm) |
| 自动 | 72/52 | 1537 | 38 | 2314 | 57.5 | 88/50 | 41.6 (3600 rpm) |
| 大功率 | 72/62 | 2053 | 38 | 2323 | 57.5 | 92/70 | 51.7 -> 49.6 (4600 rpm) |
处理器 - M5 Pro，18 个 CPU 内核
MacBook Pro 16 配备了新的 M5 Pro SoC它使用 18 个 CPU 内核（6 个超级内核、12 个性能内核），与全新 M5 Max 的 CPU 完全相同。请参阅我们的 CPU 分析了解更多芯片细节和能效数据。
如上表所示，CPU 在负载情况下的功耗高达 72 瓦，在持续工作负载情况下功耗稳定在 62 瓦，因此整体性能非常稳定。基准测试结果非常好，新的 M5 Pro CPU 比旧的 M4 Max 快一点点，比上一代的 M4 Pro.不过，这也意味着新的 M5 Max 实际上并不比旧的 M4 Max 快多少。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 201, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 28436, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4326, n=76, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
Apple 与 M4 Pro 相比，内存带宽也略有增加。总体而言，在日常使用场景中，你不会发现与配备 M5 Max 的昂贵 MacBook Pro 机型或价格低廉得多的 MacBook Pro 16 M5 基本机型或旧款 MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro 有什么不同。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2725, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2489, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 3438, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2024, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 596, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 402, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 18-Core, Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Apple 现在，它使用速度更快的 PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘，我们的测试设备采用 4 TB 版本，峰值传输速率高达 17 GB/s。
图形处理器性能
新的 M5 Pro 的 20 核 GPU与之前的 M4 Pro 相比，M5 Pro 的性能有了很大提升，我们在合成基准测试中看到了 30-50% 的改进。与 Windows 系统的竞争对手相比，M5 Pro 的 GPU 性能比大多数多媒体笔记本的 RTX 5070 慢 15%。游戏性能在很大程度上取决于游戏名称。例如，在《博德之门 3》中，M5 Pro 的性能接近 RTX 5070，而在《赛 博 朋克 2077》和《刺客信条：暗影》中，M5 Pro 的性能则要慢得多。
无论是在持续工作负载还是在电池供电情况下，GPU 性能都完全稳定，而使用 dGPU 的 Windows 笔记本电脑却并非如此。请参阅 我们专门的 GPU 分析，了解更多信息以及全新 M5 Pro GPU 的性能和效率数据。.
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2323 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 10018 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 68, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20 - 186, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (134.5 - 1042, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Asus ProArt P16 H7606WP | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 130.8 | 100.4 | 87.5 | 83.8 | 56.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 100.7 | 80.3 | 66.5 | 57.8 | 33.4 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 74.4 | 62.1 | 55.4 | 54 | 53.9 |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 50 | 46 | 40 | 26 | 22 |
排放与功耗
系统噪音
高效的 M5 Pro 芯片与防御性风扇曲线的结合，再次造就了这款日常使用的笔记本电脑非常安静。风扇经常处于关闭状态，第一级风扇的转速为 1400 转/分钟，听不到任何声音，因此当你对笔记本电脑施加更大压力时，它也能保持安静。游戏模式也非常高效，只有 33 分贝（A）和 2600 转/分钟，而我们的压力测试很快就达到 51 分贝（A）以上，然后在 49.6 分贝（A）和 4600 转/分钟时趋于平稳。在自动模式下，我们测得的噪音为 41.6 dB(A)，转速为 3600 转/分钟，比以前安静了一些。在低功耗模式下，笔记本电脑的噪音仍然很小（1400rpm）。其他电子噪音也没有问题。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.4 / 25.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.4 / 51.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.4 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro M5 Pro 18-Core, M5 Pro 20-Core GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 14-Core, M4 Pro 20-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -12% | -21% | -17% | 6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.4 | 25.1 1% | 25 2% | 24.2 5% | 24.1 5% | 24 6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.4 | 25.1 1% | 25 2% | 24.2 5% | 24.1 5% | 24 6% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.4 | 25.1 1% | 25 2% | 27.6 -9% | 24.1 5% | 24 6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 25.4 | 25.1 1% | 27.3 -7% | 32.6 -28% | 25.1 1% | 24 6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.4 | 36.9 -45% | 37.3 -47% | 42.6 -68% | 44.2 -74% | 25.3 -0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 33.6 | 48.5 -44% | 47.8 -42% | 51.2 -52% | 52.7 -57% | 33.9 -1% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 51.7 | 48.5 6% | 47.8 8% | 53.2 -3% | 52.7 -2% | 42.3 18% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度没有问题，在负载情况下，我们测得的温度仅略高于 40 °C。在压力测试中，M5 Pro 的功耗高达 92 瓦，然后在高功率模式下稳定在 70 瓦（或在自动模式下分别为 88 瓦和 50 瓦）。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.8 °C / 91 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-4.1 °C / -7.3 F).
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro M5 Pro 18-Core, M5 Pro 20-Core GPU | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 14-Core, M4 Pro 20-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -10% | -13% | -11% | 3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.6 | 42.7 -5% | 44.7 -10% | 47 -16% | 41.8 -3% | 42.7 -5% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.4 | 49.1 -16% | 42.8 -1% | 51.6 -22% | 47.9 -13% | 43.1 -2% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 23.8 | 25.4 -7% | 26.9 -13% | 24.9 -5% | 26.3 -11% | 21.5 10% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.6 | 25.5 -8% | 27.3 -16% | 25.5 -8% | 27.6 -17% | 21.5 9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
尽管竞争对手迎头赶上，大多数昂贵的多媒体笔记本电脑都提供了良好的音响系统，但Apple 仍领先一步，MacBook Pro 16 的六扬声器音响系统仍是笔记本电脑中最好的音响系统之一。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
与我们测试过的 MacBook Pro 16 M4 Pro 相比，空闲时的耗电量略高，但也要考虑到额外的内存。负载情况下的功耗也比以前高一些，但与 Windows 系统的竞争对手相比仍然较低。在最大负载情况下，MBP 16 的 140 瓦 PSU 会在一段时间内成为限制因素，最终耗电量会稳定在 134 瓦左右。在使用 180 瓦 PSU 的情况下，我们测得的最大功耗为 147 瓦。虽然差别不大，但在这些综合工作负载下，电池电量略有消耗，尽管电池指示灯仍显示 100%，MagSafe 连接器上的 LED 小灯也保持绿色。另一方面，我们的测量设备清楚地显示，压力测试后电池电量充足，因此Apple 隐藏了原装 PSU 电量不足的事实。
| Off / Standby | 0.22 / 0.42 Watt |
| Idle | 4.4 / 18.3 / 18.4 Watt |
| Load |
84.2 / 145 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro M5 Pro 18-Core, M5 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP4096Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, Tandem-OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 14-Core, M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | Average Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | -20% | -61% | -43% | 3% | 0% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.4 | 4.4 -0% | 8.5 -93% | 10.9 -148% | 8.8 -100% | 4.6 -5% | 4.4 ? -0% | 5.9 ? -34% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 18.3 | 6.4 65% | 13.6 26% | 12.1 34% | 16.1 12% | 16.8 8% | 18.3 ? -0% | 10.3 ? 44% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 18.4 | 7.1 61% | 14.1 23% | 12.5 32% | 16.5 10% | 17.1 7% | 18.4 ? -0% | 12.2 ? 34% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 84.2 | 55.1 35% | 84.5 -0% | 129.3 -54% | 89.3 -6% | 76.4 9% | 84.2 ? -0% | 66.6 ? 21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 79.8 | 133 -67% | 118.1 -48% | 172.8 -117% | 157.9 -98% | 79.3 1% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 82.5 | 134.3 -63% | 120.3 -46% | 176.6 -114% | 160.6 -95% | 83.4 -1% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 145 | 143.9 1% | 143 1% | 233.9 -61% | 177.4 -22% | 138.1 5% | 145 ? -0% | 113.1 ? 22% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
在空闲功耗略有增加之后，我们还可以看到电池运行时间略有下降。在我们以 150 尼特进行的 Wi-Fi 测试中，电池续航时间为 18.5 小时，比上一代产品缩短了一个小时。尽管如此，测试结果仍然非常出色，而且明显优于大多数 Windows 替代产品，只有三星的Galaxy Book6 Ultra 电池容量更小，但仍能与之保持一致。在显示屏亮度达到最大值的情况下，续航时间再次低于前者，分别为 6.6 小时和 7.3 小时，而Galaxy Book6 Ultra 则明显领先，达到 8.4 小时（但亮度较低，分别为 500 尼特和 MBP 16 的 ~630 尼特）。
笔记本检查评级
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro
- 03/09/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 92.3%  | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro Apple M5 Pro 18-Core ⎘ Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD | List Price: 5298€ | 2.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED |
2. 90.7%  | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | List Price: 3599€ | 1.9 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
3. 92.4%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 4500€ | 1.9 kg | 15.8 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI Tandem-OLED |
4. 89.7%  | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 4799€ | 2 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED |
5. 90.4%  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 2800€ | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
6. 93%  | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro 14-Core ⎘ Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4219€ | 2.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
