结论:MacBook Pro M5 现在更快了
Apple 新款 M5 SoC 再次大幅提升了性能,是目前市场上最快的单核处理器。与旧款 M4 SoC 相比,其多核和图形性能的提升幅度更大。此外,固态硬盘的速度也提高到了 PCIe 4.0 的水平。
散热仍由单个风扇负责,公平地说,在日常使用中你听不到风扇的声音。只有在 CPU 满负荷工作时,它的声音才会变得超大,在这种情况下,价格更高的 MBP 机型的双风扇系统无疑是更好的选择。Apple ,在设备的连接性方面也偷工减料,因为虽然新的 iPad Pro M5已经支持 Wi-Fi 7(即将推出的配备 M5 Pro/Max 的 MacBook 可能也会支持),但基本机型仍坚持使用 Wi-Fi 6。
除此之外,MacBook Pro 14 的许多功能依然出色,如果你发现自己很容易被反光所困扰,那么磨砂显示屏选项就是你的福音。基本机型的起售价为 1599 美元,但Apple 已将电源适配器从包装中移除。你也应该暂缓升级基本机型,因为配备 M5 Pro SoC 的 MacBook 最终可能会是更好的选择。
Pros
Cons
MacBook Pro 14 的基本型号再次成为Apple 配备全新一代 M5 处理器的首款 MacBook。它的基本价格下降了 100 美元,降至 1,599 美元,可获得配备 10 个内核、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘存储空间的 M5 处理器。不过,包装中不再包括充电器。我们的测试设备配备了 1 TB SSD、32 GB 内存和用于迷你 LED 面板的纳米纹理玻璃选件,因此在这种情况下,其总价高达 3000 美元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
与前代机型相比,这款笔记本电脑的外壳、端口或输入设备均未作任何改动。其铝合金一体成型机身结构依然工艺精湛、超级坚固。但是,几乎没有任何维护选项。虽然可以拆下机箱下盖,但只能清洁内部的风扇。
它的端口和连接性都没有变化。Thunderbolt 5 仍未出现(与更昂贵的 Pro 型号不同),这对大多数用户来说应该不是问题。更令人讨厌的是它没有 Wi-Fi 7,而新的 iPad Pro(同样配备了 M5)现在提供了 Wi-Fi 7。据推测,MacBook 的 M5 Pro 机型也将支持 Wi-Fi 7。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (21.1 - 198, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (27.4 - 262, n=44, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

可持续性
Apple 提供了 MacBook Pro M5 的全面环境报告。.该设备本身及其包装主要由可回收材料制成。据预测,配备 1 TB 固态硬盘和 24 GB 内存的机型在其预期使用寿命内的碳足迹为 185 千克。
显示屏 - 配备纳米纹理玻璃的微型 LED 显示屏
Apple 继续采用我们熟悉的 Mini LED 面板。购买者还可以选择哑光版本(+150 美元),我们在测试时就有这款产品。由于采用了哑光表面,它的图像质量受到了轻微影响,色彩也不那么绚丽,但反过来,你可以在明亮的环境中工作,而不必面对恼人的反光。Mini LED 背光以略低于 15 kHz 的极高频率持续闪烁,因此对敏感用户来说应该不会有什么问题。遗憾的是,由于这种闪烁,我们无法准确测定屏幕的响应时间,因此我们的测量结果意义有限。再加上其 120 Hz 的刷新率,也不会出现明显的重影现象。
在亮度方面,一切如初。在 SDR 模式下,我们测得的亮度超过 600 cd/m²,在启动环境光传感器的明亮环境中,最高可达 1,000 cd/m²。在 HDR 模式下,我们测得的亮度略低于 1,600 cd/m²。它对 HDR 内容的处理仍然非常出色。系统会自动识别此类内容,并相应地调整亮度。开箱即用,色彩准确度非常高。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 633 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
88.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6549 K
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | Dell 14 Premium Samsung 145FB02, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI LG Philips LGD07A1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5", 90 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 0% | -24% | -1% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.5 | 99.3 0% | 99.6 0% | 62.6 -37% | 98 -2% | 97.3 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 93.2 -7% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.8 | 87.2 -2% | 89 0% | 64 -28% | 88.1 -1% | 90.8 2% |
| Response Times | 90% | -36% | 11% | 79% | 88% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 49.4 ? | 0.72 ? 99% | 77.2 ? -56% | 55.8 ? -13% | 0.44 ? 99% | 0.39 ? 99% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 47 ? | 0.96 ? 98% | 71.6 ? -52% | 30.5 ? 35% | 0.61 ? 99% | 0.71 ? 98% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 14900 | 475 | 14880 ? | 240 ? | 360 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 90 | 23 74% | 90 -0% | 56 38% | 30 67% | |
| Screen | -111% | 20% | -237% | -16% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 633 | 349.3 -45% | 638 1% | 442.8 -30% | 400 -37% | 472 -25% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 619 | 352 -43% | 621 0% | 412 -33% | 403 -35% | 475 -23% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 98 7% | 95 3% | 87 -5% | 97 5% | 97 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.22 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 3.47 -247% | 0.6 40% | 5.92 -492% | 1 -0% | 1.4 -40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.2 | 7.38 -235% | 1.4 36% | 10.46 -375% | 2.8 -27% | 4.1 -86% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.6 -100% | 0.8 38% | 7.6 -485% | 1.3 -0% | 2 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6549 99% | 6758 96% | 6430 101% | 6728 97% | 6586 99% | 6493 100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 1.31 | ||||
| Contrast (:1) | 2013 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-33% | -5% /
1% | -83% /
-134% | 21% /
12% | 17% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 20.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
| ↘ 28.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 14900 Hz Amplitude: 90 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 14900 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 14900 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 配备 32GB 内存的 M5 SoC
MacBook Pro 14 专门配备了速度更快的 M5 SoC,具有 10 个 CPU 内核和 10 个 GPU 内核。你可以选择 16、24 或 32 GB 内存,但不能扩展。
处理器 -Apple M5
新的 M5 SoC 仍采用 3 纳米工艺制造,再次配备了 10 个内核。其中四个为快速性能内核,主频高达 4.608 GHz,六个为高效内核,最高主频为 3.048 GHz。该处理器的最大功耗为 30.5 瓦,随后很快降至 27.5 瓦。有关更多详细信息和效率值,请参阅 我们关于新款Apple M5 的分析文章。.
尤其是其单核性能再次令人印象深刻,Apple ,进一步扩大了其本已巨大的优势。与 新一代相比,优势达到了 10-13%。来自 AMD、英特尔和高通公司的其他竞争对手在这里毫无胜算。
在多核测试中,我们甚至看到了 19% 的性能提升,新款 M5 的性能超过了旧款 M3 Pro的性能。相比之下,目前 AMD 和英特尔的同类机型要达到这样的多核性能,需要大约 70-80 瓦的 TDP。在电池模式下,其性能保持完全稳定。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Dell 14 Premium -1! | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2069, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores) (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 200, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (2129 - 2426, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2426, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (2036 - 2344, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2344, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (2620 - 2820, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 2820, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (1307 - 1712, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2094, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (480 - 540, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 545, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (376 - 384, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 384, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU (228 - 243, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
图形处理器性能
新的 M5 GPU速度明显快于 M4 GPU,所需的最大功率同样为 18-19 瓦。我们注意到,与 M4 GPU的优势。这意味着 M5 GPU 的性能也超过了拥有 14 个内核的小型 14 核的 M3 Pro GPU并与旧的 M2 Pro GPU的水平。与其他制造商的进一步比较,请参阅我们的分析文章。
其游戏性能同样令人印象深刻,尤其是在运行《赛博朋克 2077》或《博德之门 3》等原生游戏时。此外,它的游戏性能保持绝对稳定。Metal FX 升频技术可进一步提高设备的性能。例如,我们可以将《赛博朋克 2077》(1080p,Ultra)的帧速率从 29.3 FPS 提高到 39.6 FPS,而不会明显影响图像质量。赛博朋克》未来还将支持Apple 自己版本的 "帧生成 "技术。
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1125 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 5221 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 5266 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 GPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 121, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 GPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (160 - 1042, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (169 - 401, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Dell 14 Premium | |
* ... smaller is better
| Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.4 - 121, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Entry | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 129, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 145 | 72 | 66 | 59 | 41 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 65 | 57 | 49 | 47 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 52.4 | 40.9 | 34.1 | 29.3 | 16.9 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 68.6 | 55.5 | 51.6 | 49 | 35.3 |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 32 | 30 | 26 | 16 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.5 / 24.5 / 24.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.2 / 48 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 M5 GPU, M5 (10 Cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP0512Z | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple SSD AP2048Z | Dell 14 Premium Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02 | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | -8% | -11% | -3% | -11% | -1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.5 | 25.4 -4% | 23.9 2% | 23 6% | 24 2% | 23.8 3% | 24.1 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.5 | 25.4 -4% | 23.9 2% | 23.2 5% | 24.4 -0% | 23.8 3% | 24.1 2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.5 | 25.4 -4% | 23.9 2% | 24 2% | 24.4 -0% | 23.8 3% | 24.1 2% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.5 | 25.4 -4% | 23.9 2% | 24.7 -1% | 24.5 -0% | 23.8 3% | 24.1 2% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.2 | 26.6 -6% | 30.2 -20% | 39 -55% | 25.4 -1% | 44.6 -77% | 25.3 -0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 30 | 40.1 -34% | 44.5 -48% | 43 -43% | 39.3 -31% | 35.9 -20% | 38.6 -29% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48 | 48.9 -2% | 44.5 7% | 44.9 6% | 43.1 10% | 44.6 7% | 40.5 16% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在执行简单任务时,MacBook Pro M5 的表面温度超低,即使在高负载情况下一般也不会变得很高。顺便提一下,我们在玩游戏时测得的温度最高(最高 45 °C),因为在这种情况下风扇的阻力很大。不过值得庆幸的是,这并没有造成任何限制。
在压力测试中,M5 SoC 的耗电量曾一度高达 44 瓦,但随后迅速下降,最终稳定在 30 瓦。因此,MacBook Pro 的基本型号无法在 CPU/GPU 综合负载下充分发挥 M5 的潜力。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.5 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.5 °C / 94.1 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 Apple M5 (10 Cores), Apple M5 GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores), Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU | Dell 14 Premium Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, AMD Radeon 890M | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | -3% | 3% | 3% | -12% | -22% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.8 | 41.5 5% | 47.3 -8% | 33 25% | 36 18% | 42 4% | 44.9 -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 40.6 | 40 1% | 44.2 -9% | 33.6 17% | 34.2 16% | 40.6 -0% | 51.5 -27% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 22.9 | 22.3 3% | 22.1 3% | 26.4 -15% | 25 -9% | 28.2 -23% | 28.9 -26% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 22.5 | 22.5 -0% | 22.1 2% | 25.6 -14% | 25.6 -14% | 28.9 -28% | 29.4 -31% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell 14 Premium audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
与上一代产品相比,这款笔记本电脑的闲置功耗略有降低,考虑到其高亮度,约 11 瓦的功耗是一个不错的值。在负载情况下,我们也没有发现任何意外。我们使用 70 瓦的电源适配器对 MacBook 进行了测试,结果显示电源适配器足够使用。不过,购买新款 MacBook Pro M5 的用户应注意,Apple ,现在销售该设备时不附带电源适配器;交货时只提供一根 MagSafe 电缆。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 M5 (10 Cores), M5 GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Dell 14 Premium Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02, OLED, 3200x2000, 14.5" | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Micron 2550 1TB MTFDKCD1T0TGE, OLED, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Average Apple M5 GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 3% | -27% | -14% | -58% | -39% | -0% | 31% | -52% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.1 | 2.1 -0% | 2.17 -3% | 4.4 -110% | 6.5 -210% | 5.5 -162% | 5.1 -143% | 2.04 ? 3% | 5.76 ? -174% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 11.6 | 12.5 -8% | 10.9 6% | 6.1 47% | 8.7 25% | 7.6 34% | 8.4 28% | 7.31 ? 37% | 10.5 ? 9% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 11.7 | 12.6 -8% | 11 6% | 13.7 -17% | 10.3 12% | 7.9 32% | 8.6 26% | 7.38 ? 37% | 12.4 ? -6% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 51.1 | 37.8 26% | 74.3 -45% | 53.8 -5% | 75.7 -48% | 77.9 -52% | 26.1 49% | 28.5 ? 44% | 68.1 ? -33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 42.4 | 40.2 5% | 80.5 -90% | 46.5 -10% | 73.1 -72% | 61.5 -45% | 35.3 17% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 43.6 | 42.8 2% | 50.7 -16% | 76.2 -75% | 63 -44% | 37.2 15% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 71.5 | 69 3% | 98.1 -37% | 62.7 12% | 100.7 -41% | 94.8 -33% | 67.1 6% | 46.6 ? 35% | 110.5 ? -55% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监视器时的耗电量
运行时间
虽然在 150 cd/m² 下进行 Wi-Fi 测试时测得的 16:42 小时仍是一个非常不错的结果,但该设备的续航时间不如前代机型。我们还发现,iPad Pro M5 的电池续航时间有所缩短。 iPad Pro M5的电池续航时间有所缩短,这可能是由于其单核运行功耗略有增加。在全亮度状态下,Wi-Fi 测试仍然持续了不到 5.5 小时。笔记本电脑的显示屏仍然是耗电大户。
Notebookcheck 总评分
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5
- 10/21/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 Apple M5 (10 Cores) ⎘ Apple M5 GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,999.00 Apple 2025 MacBook Pro Lapto... 2. $2,189.13 Apple 2024 MacBook Pro Lapto... 3. $19.96 BlueSwan Anti-Cracking Hard ... List Price: 2739€ | 1.5 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI Mini-LED | |
| Dell 14 Premium Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,698.00 List Price: 1950 USD | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" 3200x2000 260 PPI OLED | |
| HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,334.75 List Price: 2200 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,749.00 List Price: 1899€ | 1.5 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI MiniLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $115.99 TAICROWNE 73Wh L22C4PF4 Repl... 2. $1,135.88 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14AHP9-202... 3. $939.99 Lenovo Yoga 7i 2-in-1 Busine... List Price: 1599€ | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 14.50" 3072x1920 250 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $16.99 HSXIRQA 65W USB Type C Charg... 2. $928.99 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ... 3. $4.95 Keyboard Cover for 2025 2024... List Price: 1599€ | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.50" 2944x1840 239 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.



















































