评语:MacBook Air 15 因 M5 和 Wi-Fi 7 而变得更出色
全新的Apple M5 SoC 功能强大,效率极高,与 MacBook Air 15 的被动散热系统完美匹配。在 Windows 领域,无论是 x86 芯片还是高通公司的 ARM CPU,都无法与之媲美。M5 的性能令人惊叹,在游戏中也非常高效,我们没有遇到任何节流现象。这意味着,即使是要求苛刻的游戏,如《赛博朋克 2077》或《博德之门 3》,这款轻薄、静音的 MacBook Air 也能流畅播放,而且不会降低细节。
其他改进还包括 Wi-Fi 以及更快的 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘,起价 1299 美元的基本型号也是如此。由于升级了内存和存储设备,我们的评测机型价格不菲,但基本机型的性能基本相同,这也是我们向大多数用户推荐的机型。
MacBook Air 的不足之处依然存在,如内存和存储空间焊接、缺少 Face-ID 和有限的端口数量,这在较大的 15 英寸机型上更加令人讨厌。我们并不在意 Air 上的 IPS 屏幕,因为它没有 PWM 问题,而且画质不错,但 60 Hz 的刷新率在 2026 年已经非常过时了。考虑到入门级的 MacBook Pro 14然而,我们认为Apple 并不想为 Air 提供更好的屏幕,而是希望你换成 Pro,以获得更好的屏幕。
Pros
Cons
Apple 新款 MacBook Air 配备了速度更快的 M5 SoC,拥有 10 个 GPU 内核。制造商还升级了 Wi-Fi 模块和固态硬盘的速度,你可以以 1299 美元的价格买到配备 16GB 内存和 512GB 固态硬盘存储空间的基本机型,而我们的评测机则有一些升级(32GB 内存和 2TB 存储空间),因此标价提高到 2299 美元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
包括端口、网络摄像头和输入设备在内的外壳设计与上一代 M4 机型相比没有变化 之前的 M4 型号因此,这款笔记本电脑依然非常轻薄,重量仅为 1.512 千克。Apple 升级了 Wi-Fi 模块,现在它支持最新的 Wi-Fi 7 标准,包括蓝牙 6.0。在我们的测试中,传输速率良好且稳定,与较小的 MacBook Air 13 M5.以下图片来自上一代 M4。
| Networking | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |

可持续性
显示屏 - 60 Hz IPS,无 PWM
Apple 由于没有改变显示屏,因此我们仍然可以获得一块 60 Hz 的 IPS 屏幕(2560 x 1664 像素,16:10),并提供良好的图像质量,但低频是一个问题。屏幕表面具有防反射功能,与其他大多数亮面屏幕相比具有明显的优势,这一点在下面的户外拍摄中也很明显。几乎没有背光出血现象,也没有 PWM 闪烁,同时响应时间也不明显。亮度和色温都可以自动调节。
亮度仍在 500 尼特以内,但黑色值稍高,为 0.44,最大对比度约为 1300:1。我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析后发现,出厂时的校准效果并不理想,在色温偏冷的情况下会出现明显的偏蓝现象。这提升了最大亮度,在使用 True Tone 时并不明显,但对于图片编辑来说并不理想。我们对面板进行了校准,明显提高了精确度(可在下面的框中免费下载相应的配置文件),因此图片编辑不成问题(P3 和 sRGB)。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 538 cd/m²
Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
calibrated: 0.7
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
97.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 7075 K
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Sharp LQ150P1JX61, IPS, 2496x1664, 15", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 1% | 5% | 6% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 97.5 | 98.7 1% | 98.1 1% | 100 3% | 99.5 2% | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.3 | 100 2% | 100 2% | 100 2% | 100 2% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 86.3 | 88.3 2% | 87.2 1% | 94.6 10% | 97.5 13% | |
| Response Times | 11% | -8% | 96% | -78% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 26.9 ? | 23.2 ? 14% | 33.4 ? -24% | 1.46 ? 95% | 44.4 ? -65% | 0.64 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 15.9 ? | 14.7 ? 8% | 14.7 ? 8% | 0.44 ? 97% | 30.3 ? -91% | 0.68 ? 96% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1200 ? | 240 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 22 | 50 | ||||
| Screen | 11% | 37% | 538% | 29% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 538 | 525 -2% | 599 11% | 509 -5% | 579.9 8% | 385 -28% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 521 | 513 -2% | 590 13% | 508 -2% | 576 11% | 391 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 90 | 87 -3% | 93 3% | 97 8% | 92 2% | 97 8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.44 | 0.32 27% | 0.4 9% | 0.01 98% | 0.34 23% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1223 | 1641 34% | 1498 22% | 50900 4062% | 1706 39% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.7 19% | 0.5 76% | 1.1 48% | 0.96 54% | 1.1 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.1 | 4 2% | 0.9 78% | 2.5 39% | 2.39 42% | 1.8 56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.7 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 2.7 13% | 0.6 81% | 1.5 52% | 1.4 55% | 1.4 55% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.28 96% | 2.13 103% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7075 92% | 7010 93% | 6543 99% | 6294 103% | 6407 101% | 6444 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
9% | 10% /
22% | 213% /
347% | -25% /
8% | 41% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.9 ms rise | |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 13.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7996 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 -Apple M5,10 核 GPU
处理器
新款Apple M5(4 个超级内核、6 个效率内核)的 CPU 性能非常惊人,是目前能买到的最快的单核处理器,而且速度还相当快。多核性能也非常出色,尽管系统必须很快降低功耗限制。在耗时几分钟的 Cinebench 2024 Multi 测试中,与配备主动散热系统的 MacBook Pro 14 M5 相比,差距仍然只有 18%。在 CB24 Multi 压力测试(30 分钟)后,结果仍然只低 10%。
在所有 CPU 基准测试中,新款 M5 机型比 MacBook Air 15 M4 快 14%。 MacBook Air 15 M4快 14%,与 MacBook Air 15 M3.CPU 性能不会因电池电量不足而降低。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core (957 - 1172, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core (199 - 200, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 200, n=56, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (2129 - 2426, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (2036 - 2344, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (2620 - 2820, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (1307 - 1712, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (480 - 540, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (376 - 384, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core, Apple M5 10-Core GPU (228 - 243, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
图形处理器性能
MacBook Air 15 配备了速度更快的 M5 SoC 和 10 核 GPU与 MacBook Pro 14 M5 一样。它在短期基准测试中的表现非常出色,我们只看到了最多 5% 的差距,而与之前的 MacBook Air 15 M4 相比,至少有 30% 的优势。不过,性能并不稳定,在 3DMark 压力测试(Steel Nomad Light)中会下降约 23%。
而游戏性能则完全稳定,因为 SoC 的功耗本来就不高(在《赛博朋克 2077》、《刺客信条暗影》或《博德之门 3》等游戏中约为 8 瓦)。我们已经在较小的 MacBook Air 13 M5其结果是,即使在较长的游戏时间内,游戏性能也完全稳定。如果减少细节,Air M5 甚至可以在完全静音的情况下处理这些要求苛刻的游戏,而不会出现节流现象。
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1070 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 5084 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (76.3 - 110, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (68 - 76.3, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 861, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU (344 - 429, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Assassin's Creed Shadows - 1920x1080 Low | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17 - 26, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Total War Pharaoh - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16.7 - 50, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:T | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (30 - 42, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M3 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GB | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 99 | 54 | 48 | 42 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 60.3 | 49.8 | 41 | 39.4 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 42.6 | 32.5 | 27.1 | 23.3 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 50.9 | 47.5 | ||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 26 | 23 | 20 | 13 |
排放与功耗
系统噪音
MacBook Air 仍然使用无风扇散热装置,因此笔记本电脑始终保持静音,我们也没有感受到任何其他电子噪音。与 Windows 竞争对手相比,这是一个巨大的优势。
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | |||||
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.9 | 24.4 | 23.3 | 24.6 | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.9 | 24.4 | 23.3 | 24.6 | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.9 | 24.4 | 23.3 | 24.6 | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.9 | 24.4 | 23.3 | 24.6 | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 31.8 | 35.8 | 25.7 | 28.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 38 | 39.4 | 31.1 | 32.4 | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 41.9 | 45 | 33.2 | 32.4 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度绝对没有问题,MacBook Air 通常会保持非常凉爽。如果压力很大,温度会略高于 40 °C,但这不成问题。在 CPU/GPU 综合负载的压力测试中,M5 SoC 的功耗高达 28 瓦,约 20 分钟后迅速降至 9 瓦左右。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.3 °C / 91.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-5.1 °C / -9.1 F).
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 0% | 0% | 2% | 7% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 44.1 | 44.9 -2% | 45.7 -4% | 42.1 5% | 45.4 -3% | 44.3 -0% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43.1 | 43.9 -2% | 42.9 -0% | 39.5 8% | 37.2 14% | 51.6 -20% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24 | 23.4 2% | 23.6 2% | 24.5 -2% | 22.4 7% | 25.1 -5% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.9 | 23.5 2% | 23.1 3% | 24.4 -2% | 22 8% | 25.8 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
MacBook Air 15 的扬声器系统再次表现出色,与较小的 MacBook Air 13 相比也略胜一筹。 MacBook Air 13.
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
与前代机型相比,功耗数据并无太大变化,也不会出现意外。在压力测试中,35 瓦的 PSU 会在几秒钟内限制功耗,但很快就会降到 30.5 瓦左右。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3" | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core, M4 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Kioxia THGJFJT2T85BAT01, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Average Apple M5 10-Core GPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -48% | -21% | -33% | -27% | 11% | -21% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.2 | 2.2 -0% | 3.2 -45% | 2.4 -9% | 3 -36% | 4.2 -91% | 2.09 ? 5% | 3.97 ? -80% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 11.7 | 11.5 2% | 8.7 26% | 3.9 67% | 8.3 29% | 5.6 52% | 8.77 ? 25% | 6.92 ? 41% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 11.8 | 11.6 2% | 9 24% | 5.1 57% | 8.4 29% | 7.8 34% | 8.85 ? 25% | 8.34 ? 29% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 36.2 | 34.5 5% | 44.7 -23% | 42.5 -17% | 34.3 5% | 28.3 22% | 31.1 ? 14% | 43.4 ? -20% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 21.7 | 26.2 -21% | 49.3 -127% | 40.2 -85% | 41 -89% | 38.2 -76% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 23.5 | 24.4 -4% | 51.1 -117% | 43.5 -85% | 45.8 -95% | 38.8 -65% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 37.4 | 37.5 -0% | 64.6 -73% | 64.4 -72% | 65.2 -74% | 61.9 -66% | 43.5 ? -16% | 66 ? -76% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中,M4 型号的电池续航时间为 17.2 小时,略高于 M4 型号的 16.5 小时。不过,最大亮度下的续航时间基本相同,均为 6.7 小时。
笔记本检查评级
Apple MacBook Air 15 M5
- 03/08/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 10-Core GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" 2880x1864 224 PPI IPS | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Apple M4 10-Core ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1999€ | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" 2880x1864 224 PPI IPS | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 15 Lunar Lake Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2760€ | 1.7 kg | 18.3 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1989€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 15 Snapdragon X Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1100 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.29 mm | 15.00" 2496x1664 200 PPI IPS | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB | List Price: 1799€ | 1.5 kg | 12.3 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.





















































