结论——MacBook Pro 依然是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑，但已开始显露年代感
从几个月前我们对 M5 Pro 机型的评测中，我们已经知道 2026 款 MacBook Pro 16 是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑，但相比 MacBook Pro 14，更大的 16 英寸机身对性能强劲的 M5 Max SoC 的驾驭能力更强，其性能不仅更出色，而且更稳定。 然而，即便是16英寸的MacBook Pro也无法充分发挥M5 Max的全部潜力，其散热系统仅能支持70瓦的功耗。虽然对于4或5年前的旧款芯片（如M1 Max和M2 Max）来说，这还绰绰有余，但如今显然已远远不够。 再加上电源适配器功率不足以及供电方面的限制（即使使用更强大的电源适配器，满载运行一小时内电池电量仍会下降12%），这充分表明当前的机身和散热系统亟需重新设计。
请不要误会，MacBook Pro 16 依然是一款性能非常强劲的设备，其散热系统通常非常安静，甚至几乎听不到声音，但考虑到其售价，这些限制并不理想。 Wi-Fi 7 模块也是如此，它仅支持 160 MHz，因此传输速率上限约为 2 Gbps（而 320 MHz 模块可达 3-4 Gbps）。
另一方面，其 Mini-LED 面板在画面表现、亮度和色彩准确度方面，仍能轻松媲美最顶级的双层 OLED 面板。此外，您还可以选择哑光版本，如果传闻属实，不久后还将推出配备 OLED 触摸屏的 MacBook Pro。 总而言之，尽管存在一些缺点，搭载 M5 Max 的 16 英寸 MacBook Pro 仍是多媒体领域中性能最强劲、配置最全面的机型之一。
Pros
Cons
规格
外壳、连接性与输入设备
机身设计与前几代产品相似，采用高品质铝合金机身，配备优秀的输入设备以及 Thunderbolt 5 接口（三个端口）。不过，该机身重量达 2.14 公斤，相当沉重，市面上还有更轻便的替代产品。由于所有组件均采用焊接工艺，维护选项仍仅限于清洁风扇。 苹果的 N1 芯片支持蓝牙 6 以及 Wi-Fi 7，但受限于 160 MHz 的带宽，因此传输速率上限约为 2 Gbps。SDXC 读卡器速度较快，但不支持 SD-Express 标准。 1200 万像素的 CenterStage 网络摄像头表现良好，但照片和视频的分辨率较低，且仍不支持 Face ID。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (ADATA SD8.0 Express 512 GBAV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22.3 - 531, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (ADATA SD8.0 Express 512 GB) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (37.3 - 1455, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
显示屏——精美的Mini-LED面板
苹果仍沿用同一款Mini-LED面板（16.2英寸，3456 x 2204像素，120 Hz，镜面屏，无触控功能），该面板亦有哑光版本可选。时隔多年，其画质依然令人印象深刻，能呈现完美的纯黑和极为准确的色彩。 由于Mini-LED背光的存在，屏幕会出现闪烁现象，但其频率高达近15 kHz，因此应该不会造成任何问题。由于持续的闪烁，我们目前仍无法准确测定Mini-LED面板的响应时间，因此显示的结果并非完全准确。 请注意，该面板本身属于IPS屏幕，因此响应时间始终会比OLED面板慢。但在实际使用中，我们并未察觉到任何拖影问题。
在亮度方面，这款Mini-HDR面板仍能轻松媲美市面上最顶尖的双层OLED面板。 我们测得，在关闭光线传感器时，其SDR亮度接近700尼特；开启传感器时，最高可达1164尼特。对于HDR内容，我们测得最高亮度为1737尼特，纯白画面下则为1325尼特。此外，macOS在HDR处理方面仍优于Windows。 该面板完全覆盖了 sRGB 和 P3 色域，根据我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件进行的分析，其色彩准确度非常出色，但请注意，当在 sRGB 色域中工作时，亮度会受到 macOS 的限制。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 710 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
88.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2
CCT: 6760 K
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 ATNA60KA01-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 ATNA60HC03-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 160WV1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra ATNA60HR05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE ATNA60KA02-0, Tandem-OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE NE160QDM-NZB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -2% | -15% | -9% | -3% | -2% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1737 | 1600 -8% | 1600 -8% | 518 -70% | 1182 -32% | 1530 -12% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.3 | 97.4 -2% | 98.9 0% | 99.5 0% | 97 -2% | 98.8 -1% | 96.7 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.2 | 96.8 10% | 88.6 0% | 96.5 9% | 85.3 -3% | 88.9 1% | 86.5 -2% |
| Response Times | 91% | 85% | 87% | 62% | 91% | 78% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 43 ? | 0.27 ? 99% | 0.3 ? 99% | 0.65 ? 98% | 0.5 ? 99% | 0.26 ? 99% | 13.2 ? 69% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 41.2 ? | 0.37 ? 99% | 0.45 ? 99% | 0.87 ? 98% | 0.4 ? 99% | 0.42 ? 99% | 5.8 ? 86% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 14880 | 1200 | 480 ? | 240.2 ? | 240 ? | 1200 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 90 | 22 76% | 38 58% | 31 66% | 100 -11% | 22 76% | |
| Screen | 29% | 27% | -95% | 1% | -31% | -47% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 710 | 974 37% | 661 -7% | 395.4 -44% | 499 -30% | 578 -19% | 504 -29% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 682 | 979 44% | 663 -3% | 392 -43% | 505 -26% | 583 -15% | 504 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 98 5% | 99 6% | 95 2% | 97 4% | 98 5% | 94 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.37 | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 0.9 18% | 0.5 55% | 3.69 -235% | 0.9 18% | 1.6 -45% | 2 -82% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 1.7 19% | 1.4 33% | 7.94 -278% | 2.1 -0% | 4.5 -114% | 4.7 -124% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1.3 52% | 0.6 78% | 1.9 30% | 1.6 41% | 2.6 4% | 3.2 -19% |
| Gamma | 2 110% | 2.21 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.28 96% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6760 96% | 6751 96% | 6565 99% | 6274 104% | 6445 101% | 6527 100% | 7188 90% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.68 | 0.7 | |||||
| Contrast (:1) | 1362 | ||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 40% /
35% | 37% /
32% | -8% /
-28% | 18% /
12% | 19% /
6% | 10% /
-12% |
* ... smaller is better
性能——配备 48 GB 内存的 M5 Max
测试条件
下表展示了不同的功耗配置及其性能数据。我们在基准测试和测量中采用了“高功率”模式，以展示 M5 Max 的最大性能潜力。“自动”模式的性能依然非常强劲，我们建议将其用于日常任务。在电池供电模式下，测试结果完全一致。
| CPU（瓦特） | CB2024 Multi （分数） |
GPU（瓦特） | Steel Nomad （分数） |
《赛博朋克2077》 QHD Ultra（帧率） |
CPU&GPU TDP压力测试（瓦特） |
风扇最大噪音（dB(A)） | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 低功耗 | 13 | 999 | 9 | 2096 | 30 | 13 | 24.8 |
| 自动 | 75/54 | 2312 | 72/38 | 4373 | 62.7 | 94/48 | 40.9 |
| 高功率 | 2490 | 2073 | 72/42 | 4386 | 63.1 | 114/70 | 53.9 |
处理器
M5 Max CPU 的最大功耗可达 75 瓦，在持续负载下会稳定在 70 瓦，因此性能非常稳定。 当前 M5 世代的单核性能依然惊人，至少领先竞争对手两代（就连高通也才刚追上 M3 世代），多核性能同样出色。 与Windows平台上的直接竞争对手相比，其性能最高可达两倍；只有高性能游戏笔记本中英特尔和AMD的HX系列处理器才能在一定程度上与其匹敌。不过，在MacBook上，即使在电池供电状态下也能获得这一级别的性能，而Windows笔记本则无法做到这一点。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Max (2073 - 2490, n=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 2490, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Max (199 - 201, n=3) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (72.5 - 201, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max (29000 - 30057, n=5) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 30057, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average Apple M5 Max (4200 - 4336, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4336, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
系统与固态硬盘性能
系统性能卓越，MacBook Pro 16 的响应速度非常快，尽管在日常使用中你可能察觉不到 M5 Max 与基础型号之间的差异。 苹果采用了 PCIe 5.0 SSD，我们测试的这块 2 TB 硬盘（可用空间 1.94 TB）的写入和读取速度分别高达 17 GB/s 和 13 GB/s。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (2728 - 3231, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 3231, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (2477 - 2677, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (931 - 2677, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (3465 - 4522, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 4522, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (1777 - 2073, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2073, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (584 - 622, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 622, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (397 - 415, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 415, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max, Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (233 - 236, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
GPU性能
M5 Max GPU 可以访问系统内存，这意味着它比大多数搭载英伟达 GPU 的 Windows 竞争对手更具优势，因为后者的显存通常仅限于 8 GB 或 16 GB。搭载 AMD Strix Halo 以及即将推出的英伟达 RTX Spark 设备的系统也将具备这一优势。 就原始性能而言，拥有 40 个核心的 M5 Max GPU 性能极为强劲，在要求严苛的 3DMark Steel Nomad 测试中，其速度仅比 ProArt P16 中的 RTX 5090 （120W功耗）的性能仅慢12%，在严苛的3DMark Steel Nomad测试中，其表现明显优于搭载RTX 5060或RTX 5070显卡的直接竞争对手。 相比之下，其游戏性能稍逊一筹，但依然表现不俗，用户可以以最高画质运行所有受支持的游戏。不过，macOS平台上的游戏数量仍然有限，因此在这方面，Windows电脑仍更具优势。
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 4386 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 17649 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Multimedia (17.8 - 68, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (23.3 - 25.6, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12 - 105, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Average of class Multimedia (20 - 186, n=20, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (133 - 1042, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 M4 Max | |
| Average Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU (133 - 149, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Multimedia (105 - 492, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
| Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
| Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18 - 49, n=12, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Total War Pharaoh - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro | |
| Average of class Multimedia (35.3 - 58.9, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 210.6 | 170.3 | 141.7 | 134.6 | 96.4 | 50.6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 152.7 | 136.4 | 117.2 | 102.8 | 63.1 | 25.4 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 55.3 | 55.5 | 54.3 | |||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 75 | 67 | 61 | 42 | 37 | 26 |
排放与功耗
系统噪音
MacBook Pro 仍是一款非常安静的笔记本电脑，其风扇曲线设计也十分保守，因此短暂的峰值负载情况（尤其是在“自动”模式下）通常不会导致风扇运转声可闻。 如果真的对笔记本进行高负载运行，风扇在“高功率”模式下会非常响，噪音几乎达到 54 dB(A)；而在“自动”模式下，噪音则要安静得多，约为 41 dB(A)。不过，在“低功率”模式下，风扇以最低转速运行时完全听不到声音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 24.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 33.8 / 53.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) | ||
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | -0% | -1% | -2% | -4% | -10% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.8 | 23.3 6% | 25.1 -1% | 25 -1% | 24.3 2% | 24.1 3% | 24.2 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.8 | 23.4 6% | 25.1 -1% | 25 -1% | 24.3 2% | 24.1 3% | 24.2 2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.8 | 23.4 6% | 25.1 -1% | 25 -1% | 24.3 2% | 24.1 3% | 27.6 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.8 -4% | 25.1 -1% | 27.3 -10% | 28.3 -14% | 25.1 -1% | 32.6 -31% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 33.8 | 38 -12% | 36.9 -9% | 37.3 -10% | 38 -12% | 44.2 -31% | 42.6 -26% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 48.9 | 38.1 22% | 48.5 1% | 47.8 2% | 48.5 1% | 52.7 -8% | 51.2 -5% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 53.9 | 48.6 10% | 48.5 10% | 47.8 11% | 51.9 4% | 52.7 2% | 53.2 1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在满载状态下，表面温度也完全没有问题。我们测得的最高温度仅为43 °C，因此不存在任何限制。在压力测试中，M5 Max的功耗最高达到114瓦，随后迅速稳定在70瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.3 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-3.8 °C / -6.8 F).
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro M5 Pro 18-Core, M5 Pro 20-Core GPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | 3% | -8% | -9% | -2% | -10% | -11% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.3 | 40.6 6% | 40.6 6% | 42.7 1% | 44.7 -3% | 41.3 5% | 41.8 3% | 47 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.9 | 42.4 1% | 39.8 7% | 49.1 -14% | 42.8 -0% | 41.8 3% | 47.9 -12% | 51.6 -20% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 23.4 | 23.8 -2% | 23.2 1% | 25.4 -9% | 26.9 -15% | 25.5 -9% | 26.3 -12% | 24.9 -6% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.5 | 23.6 -0% | 23.8 -1% | 25.5 -9% | 27.3 -16% | 25.4 -8% | 27.6 -17% | 25.5 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
这款由六个模块组成的音箱系统依然是市面上最出色的产品之一，虽然竞争对手的表现也不遑多让，但它仍略胜一筹。
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.2% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗与电池续航时间
虽然 MacBook Pro 16 在轻度工作负载和空闲状态下能效表现良好，但在高负载下的功耗却是一个问题。 我们记录到的最高功耗为150瓦，在压力测试过程中，功耗在130至140瓦之间波动。然而，在进行一小时的综合工作负载测试后，电池电量从100%骤降至仅88%，这确实是个问题。 我们还测试了功率更高的180W电源适配器，但表现相同。在150尼特的亮度下，电池续航表现出色，Wi-Fi测试中可达18.5小时；而在最大SDR亮度下（考虑到高亮度），续航时间仍相当不错，接近7小时。
| Off / Standby | 0.08 / 1.1 Watt |
| Idle | 2.7 / 13.3 / 13.5 Watt |
| Load |
141 / 150.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro M5 Pro 18-Core, M5 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP4096Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Ultra 7 356H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, Tandem-OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | Average Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | 36% | 14% | -22% | -63% | -42% | -57% | 10% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.7 | 4.4 -63% | 4 -48% | 4.4 -63% | 8.5 -215% | 9 -233% | 8.8 -226% | 10.9 -304% | 2.6 ? 4% | 5.58 ? -107% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 13.3 | 18.3 -38% | 4.4 67% | 6.4 52% | 13.6 -2% | 14.8 -11% | 16.1 -21% | 12.1 9% | 12.5 ? 6% | 10.2 ? 23% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 13.5 | 18.4 -36% | 10.2 24% | 7.1 47% | 14.1 -4% | 16.7 -24% | 16.5 -22% | 12.5 7% | 12.7 ? 6% | 12.5 ? 7% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 141 | 84.2 40% | 44.2 69% | 55.1 61% | 84.5 40% | 92.8 34% | 89.3 37% | 129.3 8% | 118.3 ? 16% | 66.2 ? 53% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 136.7 | 79.8 42% | 62.4 54% | 133 3% | 118.1 14% | 212 -55% | 157.9 -16% | 172.8 -26% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 128.9 | 82.5 36% | 62.6 51% | 134.3 -4% | 120.3 7% | 215 -67% | 160.6 -25% | 176.6 -37% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 150.3 | 145 4% | 94.6 37% | 143.9 4% | 143 5% | 281.5 -87% | 177.4 -18% | 233.9 -56% | 124.6 ? 17% | 112.1 ? 25% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
Notebookcheck 评分
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max
- 08/27/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 92.4%  | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Max Apple M5 Max ⎘ Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 5699€ | 2.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED |
2. 92.3%  | Apple MacBook Pro 16 2026 M5 Pro Apple M5 Pro 18-Core ⎘ Apple M5 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 4096 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 5298€ | 2.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.20" 3456x2234 254 PPI Mini-LED |
3. 87.2%  | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,977.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... 2. $2,999.00 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... 3. $2,899.99 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... List Price: 2350 USD | 1.7 kg | 14.62 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
4. 90.7%  | Samsung Galaxy Book6 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 7 356H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3599€ | 1.9 kg | 15.4 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED |
5. 92.4%  | Lenovo ThinkPad T1g Gen 8 21TD003GE Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4500€ | 1.9 kg | 15.8 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI Tandem-OLED |
6. 89.9%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 16p G6 21R00013GE Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1939€ | 2.1 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
7. 90.4%  | Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 RTX 5070 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2800€ | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
8. 89.7%  | Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4799€ | 2 kg | 18.3 mm | 16.00" 3840x2400 283 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
