Notebookcheck

死循环性能分析

在一个无限的循环中。 Deathloop不仅是一款原创的、设计精良的游戏,而且在视觉上也很震撼。故事也没有让人失望。我们在台式电脑和笔记本上对Deathloop进行了基准测试。我们的发现。它需要大量的VRAM。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
死亡之路

技术

法国开发商Arkane Studios主要以Dishonored系列游戏(该系列的第一款游戏于2012年发布,第二款于2016年发布)而闻名,它在制作非传统游戏方面很有一手。死神》也不例外,它将原创性的水平提升到了新的高度。这款第一人称射击游戏在视觉上和游戏性上都很难归类。它融合了《边疆3》等掠夺式射击游戏、角色扮演游戏(不同地点的各种任务)和《游侠》等老式地下城爬行游戏的元素(死亡会带来可怕的后果)。

死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路

Deathloop的主要特点之一是它所允许的自由度。由于有大量的武器、小工具和能力的选择,玩家可以自由定制他们的游戏风格。隐身系统很强大,枪战游戏也是如此。然而,在《毁灭战士》等游戏中,运动感觉更流畅一些,而且人工智能也不像它本来那样先进。在视觉上,《死神》也有可圈可点之处。与许多其他现代作品相比,游戏中有很多视觉上的变化。

死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路

总体而言,视觉效果可以说是好到非常好。纹理和效果看起来都令人印象深刻。该游戏的PC版提供了一个非常全面的图形设置菜单。虽然视频选项卡包含15个设置(其中一个用于可选的升频),但高级选项卡也有大约15个设置,由于包含的预设,所有这些都可以一举改变。预设范围从极低到超低(共六个)。非常好。图形变化可以在不重新启动的情况下应用。

死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路

Arkane工作室真的需要在优化VRAM使用方面下功夫。根据内置的VRAM测量仪,《死神》像热煎饼一样吞噬了VRAM。要在1080p的超级设置下运行游戏,你将需要一个至少有6GB VRAM的GPU。如果你想在超设置下以4K的速度进行游戏,将需要一个具有8GB VRAM的显卡。我们将在我们的基准测试中看到事情的实际情况如何。Deathloop应该是支持光线追踪的。因为只有一个RT效果(软阴影),它与预设相结合,我们将不进行任何额外的光线追踪基准测试。

死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路
死亡之路

基准

我们为这个性能分析创建了自己的基准序列。我们的基准测试发生在The Complex(游戏中约一小时)。正如你在下面的视频中看到的,在我们的基准中,主角在综合体外运行了30秒。我们使用CapFrameX来捕获帧率数据。Deathloop有一个硬性的120-FPS上限,这意味着在1080p的降低设置下,用强大的GPU进行游戏时,帧率往往会达到上限。

结果

基准测试主要使用我们的合作伙伴MSI和XMG(Schenker Technologies)借给我们的笔记本电脑进行。

FHD (1920x1080)

Deathloop不会在具有2GB视频缓冲区的GPU上运行。入门级的GPU,如 MX350MX450即使在最低设置下也不能处理这个游戏。在这里,4GB是最基本的。中档显卡的水平是 GeForce GTX 1650(Ti)可以在1080p的中等预设下运行Deathloop。一个中档次的GPU,如 GTX 1660 Ti需要在最高设置下达到可玩的帧率。

Deathloop
    1920x1080 Low Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
120 (24.7min, 96P0.1, 105P1) fps ∼63%
119 (84.7min, 98.7P0.1, 105P1) fps ∼60%
119 (80.8min, 88.4P0.1, 100P1) fps ∼72%
109 (75.8min, 79.2P0.1, 85.4P1) fps ∼66%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
120 (28.1min, 94.7P0.1, 106P1) fps ∼63%
118 (4.52min, 78P0.1, 103P1) fps ∼60%
110 (44.5min, 73.5P0.1, 88.9P1) fps ∼66%
100 (37min, 55.3P0.1, 75.3P1) fps ∼61%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
120 (42.6min, 93.2P0.1, 108P1) fps ∼63%
120 (28.3min, 93.8P0.1, 107P1) fps ∼61%
113 (46.5min, 74.4P0.1, 93.4P1) fps ∼68%
107 (41min, 65.8P0.1, 82.5P1) fps ∼65%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
119 (87.5min, 96.4P0.1, 103P1) fps ∼62%
119 (62.6min, 93.2P0.1, 101P1) fps ∼60%
119 (24.9min, 91.7P0.1, 103P1) fps ∼72%
114 (80.3min, 83.1P0.1, 89.4P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
119 (95.7min, 99P0.1, 105P1) fps ∼62%
119 (23.8min, 92.1P0.1, 103P1) fps ∼60%
118 (86.8min, 88.7P0.1, 98.5P1) fps ∼71%
114 (80.9min, 82.5P0.1, 89.6P1) fps ∼70%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
116 (19.2min, 27.4P0.1, 94.3P1) fps ∼61%
107 (18min, 23.4P0.1, 88.3P1) fps ∼54%
90.6 (20.5min, 46.5P0.1, 68.7P1) fps ∼55%
81.3 (32.2min, 35P0.1, 42.9P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
92.8 (15.6min, 18.5P0.1, 74.8P1) fps ∼49%
81.5 (18.5min, 60.4P0.1, 68.3P1) fps ∼41%
65.6 (26.1min, 49.4P0.1, 52.6P1) fps ∼40%
57.4 (25.9min, 43.3P0.1, 45.9P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
Schenker XMG Focus 17
79.6 (17.8min, 58P0.1, 63.3P1) fps ∼42%
70.2 (27.6min, 56.5P0.1, 58.5P1) fps ∼35%
49.3 (24min, 37.8P0.1, 39P1) fps ∼30%
42.2 (21.5min, 29.9P0.1, 31.4P1) fps ∼26%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
64.6 (20.1min, 45.4P0.1, 50.9P1) fps ∼34%
56.4 (19.7min, 43.6P0.1, 47.2P1) fps ∼28%
43.8 (17.5min, 18.5P0.1, 36.6P1) fps ∼26%
40.4 (17min, 20.9P0.1, 33.2P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
59 (18.7min, 36.8P0.1, 46.4P1) fps ∼31%
51.2 (17.5min, 26.3P0.1, 39.7P1) fps ∼26%
37.3 (15.1min, 15.6P0.1, 27.3P1) fps ∼22%
34.3 (14.9min, 19.9P0.1, 27.2P1) fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15
11.1 (6.99min, 7.11P0.1, 7.77P1) fps ∼6%
6.94 (4.03min, 4.2P0.1, 4.85P1) fps ∼4%
6.34 (2.64min, 2.81P0.1, 3.85P1) fps ∼4%
5.81 (3.76min, 3.81P0.1, 4.16P1) fps ∼4%
NVIDIA GeForce MX350, i5-10210U
Honor Magicbook Pro
9.96 (5.56min, 5.91P0.1, 7.11P1) fps ∼5%
8.17 (5.02min, 5.08P0.1, 5.63P1) fps ∼4%
6.62 (4.1min, 4.14P0.1, 4.58P1) fps ∼4%
6.4 (3.06min, 3.36P0.1, 4.46P1) fps ∼4%

QHD (2560x1440)

为了获得愉快的1440p游戏体验,一个拥有6GB VRAM的高端GPU是必须的。你将需要像 GeForce RTX 3060才能在1440p的超预设下以体面的帧率运行《死神》。

Deathloop
    2560x1440 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
114 (78.1min, 81.3P0.1, 88P1) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
108 (60.3min, 75P0.1, 82.6P1) fps ∼73%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
82.9 (14.5min, 17.2P0.1, 62.1P1) fps ∼56%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
80.3 (38.8min, 59.9P0.1, 65.6P1) fps ∼55%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
72 (15.7min, 15.9P0.1, 58P1) fps ∼49%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
58.7 (31.8min, 46.5P0.1, 48.9P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
40.1 (21.2min, 33.7P0.1, 34.7P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
26.3 (11.7min, 13.7P0.1, 22.3P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
22.1 (12.3min, 14.9P0.1, 17.9P1) fps ∼15%

UHD (3840x2160)

在4K时,即使是拥有8至16GB VRAM的最有能力的GPU也在挣扎。在笔记本GPU中,只有 RTX 3070RTX 3080可以处理4K下的Dealthloop。然而,最高端的台式机显卡甚至可以达到平均60 FPS。

Deathloop
    3840x2160 Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X
77.5 (51.6min, 61.8P0.1, 64.6P1) fps ∼78%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio
68.5 (48.9min, 57.1P0.1, 58.6P1) fps ∼69%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X
49.7 (14.5min, 16.4P0.1, 42.5P1) fps ∼50%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP
44.9 (30.1min, 37.6P0.1, 39.8P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP
40.3 (14.3min, 15.2P0.1, 33.7P1) fps ∼40%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP
32.8 (21.2min, 26.9P0.1, 28.2P1) fps ∼33%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H
MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD
21 (13.7min, 16.5P0.1, 18.8P1) fps ∼21%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GP75
11.9 (9.29min, 9.33P0.1, 10P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H
MSI GL75
8.11 (6.26min, 6.48P0.1, 7.11P1) fps ∼8%

注意事项

由于视频游戏的基准测试非常耗时,而且经常受到安装/激活限制的制约,在发布时,我们只能提供对Deathloop的部分性能分析。其他显卡将在未来几天和几周内加入。

恼人的是。我们的全AMD笔记本电脑 戴尔G5(Ryzen 7 4800H& Radeon RX 5600M)无法使用专用GPU启动Deathloop,即使我们使用了最新的GPU驱动。

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< PrevNext >Deathloop
 Deathloop (2021)
low
1280x720
Very Low Preset
med.
1920x1080
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
QHD
2560x1440
Ultra Preset
4K
3840x2160
Ultra Preset
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
119
118
114
114
77.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
119
119
114
108
68.5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
119
119
109
82.9
49.7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
120
113
107
80.3
44.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
118
110
100
72
40.3
AMD Radeon RX 6700M
99.8
85.1
77.3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
107
81.45n2
72.4n2
58.7
32.8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop)
119
102
86.9
69
46.8
27.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
81.5
65.6
57.4
40.1
21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
71.3n2
53.35n2
46.7n2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
56.4
43.8
40.4
26.3
11.9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
51.2
37.3
34.3
22.1
8.11
NVIDIA GeForce MX450
6.94
6.34
5.81
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
8.17
6.62
6.4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
37.6
18.1
13.7
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
23.7
11.2
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
11.6
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test Systems


设备
GPU CPU RAM 操作系统
XMG Neo 15 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17 NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti @85 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-11800H 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
微星GP65 NvidiaGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-9750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
微星GP75 NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
微星GL75 NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6) Intel Core i7-10750H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
小米RedmiBook Pro 15 NvidiaGeForce MX450 (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-11370H 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
Honor MagicBook Pro NvidiaGeForce MX350 (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Core i7-10210U 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
戴尔G5 15 SE AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Ryzen 7 4800H 2 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
微星 Prestige 14 Evo Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs) Intel Core i7-1185G7 1 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
台式电脑 I MSIGeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X)
MSIGeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X)
MSIGeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)
Intel Core i9-9900K 4 x 8 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64位
Desktop PC II NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X)
Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6)
NvidiaGeForce RTX 2080 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
NvidiaGeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
NvidiaGeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6)
KFA2GeForce GTX 1660 Super(6 GB GDDR6)
PNYGeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5)
KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 Super (4 GB GDDR6)
KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5)
AMD RadeonRX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6)
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 2 x 16 GB DDR4 Windows 10 64 Bit
4K显示器 Nvidia驱动程序 AMD驱动程序
华硕PB287Q,飞利浦Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK ForceWare 471.96 Adrenalin 21.9.1
Stanislav Kokhanyuk
Editor of the original article: Stanislav Kokhanyuk - Translator - 59 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2021
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18108 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 死循环性能分析
Florian Glaser, 2021-09-23 (Update: 2021-09-23)