Notebookcheck

XMG Focus 17 (Clevo NP70HK)笔记本电脑回顾。配备RTX 3050 Ti的中档游戏笔记本

安培芯片接近其极限。 由于现代游戏对VRAM的要求不断提高,特别是入门级和中端GPU不得不面临越来越多的挣扎。继续阅读,了解XMG Focus 17在我们的游戏测试中对竞争对手的表现如何。
Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Tiger Lake

XMG Focus 17可以在制造商的网站bestware.com 。与Schenker Technologies的许多其他笔记本电脑相比,配置选项相当有限。例如,目前只有一个显示器(144赫兹的全高清IPS)、显卡(GeForce RTX 3050 Ti )和处理器(Core i7-11800H )的选项。在内存和存储方面有更多选择。前者从8GB到最大64GB不等,而后者由M.2固态硬盘和/或2.5英寸驱动器组成。主要是由于2.5英寸的插槽,电池容量只有49Wh。为了电池寿命,我们希望这里有两个M.2插槽。当涉及到无线模块、键盘语言和操作系统时,客户也可以选择。

在价格方面,XMG Focus 17的起价为1239欧元(约1439美元)。然而,我们的测试配置是32GB双通道内存和1TB固态硬盘,价格超过1500欧元(约合人民币1743元),这对一个配备RTX 3050 Ti的设备来说是相当大的。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4096 MB, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1500 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 471.96, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR4-3200, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, Full HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, NVMe, one M.2 slot (in use), one 2.5-inch slot (empty)
Soundcard
Realtek ALC256 @ Intel Tiger Point-LP PCH - cAVS
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1 headset, 1 mic, Card Reader: SD/SDHC/SDXC
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.5 x 397 x 262
Battery
49 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 150-watt power adapter, Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.458 kg, Power Supply: 440 g
Price
1,552 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

竞争对手包括其他配备中端或低端显卡的17英寸笔记本,如华硕ROG Strix G17 G713QE宏碁Nitro 5 AN517-53微星Katana GF76 11UE ,以及 华硕TUF F17 FX706HM 。所有这些笔记本电脑都作为对比设备出现在表格中。

注:由于外壳和连接性与15英寸版本基本相同,一些文字段落改编自XMG Focus的评测,只是稍作修改。XMG Focus 15的评论,只是稍作修改。

Possible contenders in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81.3 %
10/2021
Schenker XMG Focus 17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.4 %
09/2021
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg24.6 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.1 %
08/2021
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
80.4 %
09/2021
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg25.2 mm17.30"1920x1080
82.8 %
10/2021
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

案例

该机箱基于Clevo的裸机(NP70HK),几乎在每个方面都显得非常谨慎。除了微妙的设计,其余方面也相当不引人注目。17英寸的机身在大多数情况下都有一个干净的表面和良好的稳定性,但是当施加较强的压力时,塑料表面会在这里和那里弯曲,但这在实践中不会成为麻烦。铰链也给人留下了坚实的印象。虽然在设备打开时,底座会有一些晃动,但显示屏仍然可以用一只手打开。

XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17

约2.5公斤的重量是平均水平。竞争对手的重量在2.5至2.7公斤之间。Focus 17的建筑高度最低,为23.5毫米。

Size comparison

404 mm 280 mm 25 mm 2.6 kg399 mm 269 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg398 mm 273 mm 25.2 mm 2.7 kg397 mm 262 mm 23.5 mm 2.5 kg395 mm 282 mm 24.6 mm 2.5 kg

连接性

端口

可以不使用Thunderbolt的用户应该对Focus 17的连接性感到满意。左侧有一个肯辛顿锁、两个USB-A端口(1个2.0,1个3.0)和两个用于麦克风和耳机的音频插孔,右侧有一个成熟的读卡器、一个USB-C端口(3.2 Gen 2)、另一个USB-A端口(3.0)和一个带有可伸缩机制的RJ45端口。最后,电源和图像输出(HDMI 2.0,Mini DisplayPort 1.4)位于背面。

由于一些接口被放在后面,而且USB端口分布合理,应该有足够的肘部空间来使用外部鼠标。

左侧。Kensington锁、USB-A 3.0、USB-A 2.0、麦克风、耳麦
左侧。Kensington锁、USB-A 3.0、USB-A 2.0、麦克风、耳麦
右侧。读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.0、RJ45 LAN
右侧。读卡器、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2、USB-A 3.0、RJ45 LAN
背面。Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, 电源
背面。Mini DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.0, 电源

SD卡阅读器

内置的读卡器支持SD、SDHC和SDXC格式,提供适度的性能。你可以期望连续阅读和照片传输的速度在80到90MB/s左右。理论上,我们的128GB AV Pro V60参考卡可以达到200MB/s以上。所有其他竞争者都必须在没有读卡器的情况下才能做到。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years)
116 MB/s ∼100% +41%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
82 MB/s ∼71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 257, n=93, last 2 years)
130 MB/s ∼100% +43%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
91 MB/s ∼70%

沟通

我们的测试设备上有一个英特尔Wi-Fi 6 AX201作为无线模块,除了WLAN 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax标准之外,还支持蓝牙5.1。当在距离Netgear Nighthawk AX12参考路由器1米处测试时,Focus 17在发送数据时只表现得中规中矩,只有不到900 Mb/s。另一方面,在接收数据时,大约1300Mb/s是一个很好的速率。

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1422 (1363min - 1490max) MBit/s ∼100% +53%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1394 (758min - 1577max) MBit/s ∼98% +50%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=268)
1157 MBit/s ∼81% +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (338 - 1645, n=161, last 2 years)
1142 MBit/s ∼80% +23%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
927 (736min - 1013max) MBit/s ∼65%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
MediaTek MT7921
678 (519min - 770max) MBit/s ∼48% -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
582 (312min - 680max) MBit/s ∼41% -37%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1375 (1253min - 1402max) MBit/s ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1326 (1269min - 1361max) MBit/s ∼96%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1302 (718min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼95% -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=268)
1247 MBit/s ∼91% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=161, last 2 years)
1206 MBit/s ∼88% -9%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
MediaTek MT7921
788 (684min - 866max) MBit/s ∼57% -41%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
 
569 (350min - 709max) MBit/s ∼41% -57%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501340135713391314134013391351132113261340136113241339134513391315131913371269131813331308131313291314129313111304129713241340135713391314134013391351132113261340136113241339134513391315131913371269131813331308131313291314129313111304129713249479279189049309518938927369529219329669509788989458399839269359168748611013960918989977978Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1325 (1269-1361)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø927 (736-1013)

网络摄像头

像往常一样,你不应该对网络摄像头有太多的期望。图像清晰度和色彩还原度都相当一般。

ColorChecker
18.9 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
21 ∆E
19 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
17.9 ∆E
15 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
21 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Focus 17: 17.19 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 25.72 ∆E

辅料

盒子里的内容是一份快速启动指南,一张包含驱动程序的DVD,一个包含软件的U盘,以及2.5英寸插槽的螺丝。一个令人愉快的轻巧的150瓦模型作为Focus 17的电源适配器。

维护

要进入内部,你必须从底座的底部卸下总共15颗螺丝。然后,底盖可以用很小的力气拿下来。正如Clevo的典型做法一样,维护选项令人印象深刻。除了电池、WLAN模块和内存,M.2插槽和2.5英寸的插槽也可以进入。冷却系统由两个风扇组成,有几根热管通向CPU和GPU(都是焊接的,因此不能更换)。

XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17
XMG Focus 17

担保

基本保修期为两年(6个月的快速维修)。在整个期限内,可提供长达3年的快速维修服务,但需要额外收费。

输入设备

键盘

我们已经从其他Clevo裸机熟悉了这个键盘。这款可以用多种颜色和级别照明的Chiclet模型,提供了一个专门的数字键盘以及相当好的打字体验。客户也会对其舒适的按键尺寸感到满意。除了WASD键之外,方向箭头的尺寸也很合适。打字的噪音一般,所以它既不安静也不特别响。一个不错的特点。由于键盘的位置较高,掌托非常充裕。

触摸板

触摸板也令人印象深刻。15 x 9厘米对于一台17英寸的笔记本电脑来说是一个巨大的表面。遵循最新的趋势,这是一个没有专用按钮的ClickPad。光滑的表面和良好的精度为使用鼠标提供了非常流畅的体验。另一方面,制造商在稳定性方面需要改进。鼠标的替代物特别是在左边和右边的边缘会被过度地压入。同样的问题也影响到15英寸的同类产品

显示

一个传统的IPS面板,分辨率为1920x1080像素,频率为144赫兹,负责图像的再现。

320
cd/m²
311
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
309
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
285
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 320 cd/m² Average: 300.6 cd/m² Minimum: 18 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 309 cd/m²
Contrast: 1545:1 (Black: 0.2 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.04 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 0.94
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.159
Schenker XMG Focus 17
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
BOE NV173FHM-NX4 (BOE09B4), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
AU Optronics AUI8294 (B173HAN04.9), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
-37%
-43%
-38%
-38%
Display P3 Coverage
64.9
40.2
-38%
36.7
-43%
39.8
-39%
40.1
-38%
sRGB Coverage
96.4
60.3
-37%
55
-43%
59.51
-38%
60
-38%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
66.1
41.6
-37%
37.9
-43%
41.12
-38%
41.4
-37%
Response Times
-74%
-66%
-137%
-107%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
26.8 ?(14, 12.8)
-76%
24.8 ?(12.4, 12.4)
-63%
36.8 ?(17.2, 19.6)
-142%
32.4
-113%
Response Time Black / White *
11.2 ?(6, 5.2)
19.2 ?(10.8, 8.4)
-71%
18.8 ?(10.8, 8)
-68%
26 ?(13.6, 12.4)
-132%
22.4
-100%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-26%
-65%
-54%
-43%
Brightness middle
309
270.5
-12%
286
-7%
260
-16%
266
-14%
Brightness
301
269
-11%
261
-13%
251
-17%
264
-12%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
83
-7%
85
-4%
79
-11%
Black Level *
0.2
0.19
5%
0.23
-15%
0.26
-30%
0.32
-60%
Contrast
1545
1424
-8%
1243
-20%
1000
-35%
831
-46%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.04
4.39
-44%
4.92
-62%
3.9
-28%
3.97
-31%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
9.05
20.8
-130%
19.29
-113%
20.64
-128%
8.93
1%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
0.94
1.56
-66%
4.73
-403%
3.71
-295%
3.5
-272%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
4.5
3.1
31%
1.9
58%
1.6
64%
1.8
60%
Gamma
2.159 102%
2.14 103%
2.175 101%
2.068 106%
2.31 95%
CCT
7786 83%
6927 94%
6782 96%
6511 100%
6754 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
41.4
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
60
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-46% / -35%
-58% / -60%
-76% / -63%
-63% / -51%

* ... smaller is better

看看积极的方面,我们不得不提到良好的对比度。1,545:1是测试领域的最佳比率,紧随其后的是华硕Strix G17的1,424:1。0.2cd/m²的黑色水平也不需要在竞争中退缩。

卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:灰鳞
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
卡尔曼:色彩饱和度
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN: 灰度表(已校准
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN:色彩饱和度(已校准)。
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (已校准)

该面板在亮度方面的表现并不理想。平均301cd/m²的亮度足以排在第一位,但你会发现自己很快就希望在阳光较好的环境中获得更高的显示亮度(关键词:"户外使用")。色彩准确性也比Focus 15差。面板在被校准之前就有蓝色的色调。

XMG Focus 17与sRGB对比
XMG Focus 17与sRGB对比
子像素网格
子像素网格
XMG Focus 17 vs. AdobeRGB
XMG Focus 17 vs. AdobeRGB

我们能够测量出96%(sRGB)和66%(AdobeRGB)的色彩空间覆盖率--对于一台游戏笔记本来说,这是相对较好的数值。黑到白的响应时间为11.2毫秒,灰到灰的响应时间为15.2毫秒,比竞争对手的要好。

眩光
眩光
视角
视角

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7.6 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

测试条件

可以使用预装的控制中心软件来调整几个系统设置。我们的测试是在 "性能模式 "下进行的,使用的是自动风扇速度。

控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心
控制中心

业绩

尽管我们的评测样品配备了八核CPU、32GB内存和1TB固态硬盘,但XMG Focus 17 "只 "属于中端产品。GeForce RTX 3050 Ti是为休闲玩家准备的,他们不需要以最大的细节来玩每一个新的标题,也不指望系统能特别适应未来。

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

处理器

英特尔Core i7-11800H是目前移动游戏领域最具竞争力的处理器之一。这款10纳米的型号有24MB的L3缓存,可以使用超线程技术并行处理多达16个线程。负载下的时钟速率从2.3GHz到最高4.6GHz。

在我们的Cinebench循环中,Focus 17在微星Katana GF76(也是11800H)和华硕TUF F17(11900H )之间舒适地定位。在这里,CPU的性能在相当长的一段时间内保持稳定。尽管如此,Focus 17在与基于Ryzen 7 5800H 的笔记本电脑的竞争中遇到了困难。由于大多数3D应用都依赖于GPU,用户在游戏时不需要担心任何问题。

Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test

010521031542052563073584094510501155126013651470157516801785189019951922.151854.771869.61857.361784.841799.941781.11782.371762.741787.391796.141763.981788.671767.641788.591772.51792.361779.911777.461786.111767.641788.591768.891789.871801.232044.892051.912049.922055.922054.552054.972054.442054.342049.082053.392052.762059.312052.762054.762051.62055.922049.082049.922049.812053.812051.492055.712057.32056.242056.242049.922048.242056.342054.862051.492051.72049.812056.662053.282051.392054.762051.72049.712057.512053.282056.242053.812054.652053.392019.392049.292034.172047.192048.342054.34985.71987.24981.19980.2967.61981.55976.47979.84983.82985.32988.73980.2985.71987.61974.07981.33986.85982.29983.07982.83953.06981.93983.04956.07974.451822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62029.221957.331933.31876.081915.431921.231926.971872.051921.231895.641870.641906.941917.1818901908.311883.061899.881878.821901.231861.161743.831873.451858.821795.91934.241792.841805.381786.911776.041698.44Tooltip
Schenker XMG Focus 17 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1797 (1762.74-1922.15)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2052 (2019.39-2059.31)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ Intel Core i5-11300H: Ø980 (953.06-988.73)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1681 (1645.14-1822.57)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø1874 (1698.44-2029.22)
Cinebench R23
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13002 (12859.5min - 13002.3max) Points ∼100% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=26)
11885 Points ∼91% +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
11567 Points ∼89% +6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
11080 Points ∼85% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
10879 Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=86, last 2 years)
10858 Points ∼84% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
6581 Points ∼51% -40%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1574 Points ∼100% +14%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points ∼95% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=24)
1490 Points ∼95% +8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
1426 Points ∼91% +3%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1423 Points ∼90% +3%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1386 Points ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=85, last 2 years)
1366 Points ∼87% -1%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4990 Points ∼100% +25%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=28)
4597 Points ∼92% +15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
4403 Points ∼88% +11%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
4214 Points ∼84% +6%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
3983 Points ∼80%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=190, last 2 years)
3745 Points ∼75% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
2533 Points ∼51% -36%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
600 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
579 Points ∼97% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=25)
573 Points ∼96% +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼92% +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
546 Points ∼91% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
533 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=189, last 2 years)
498 Points ∼83% -7%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2059 (2019.39min - 2059.31max) Points ∼100% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
2029 Points ∼99% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=27)
1934 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1922 (1762.74min - 1922.15max) Points ∼93%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1823 (1645.14min - 1822.57max) Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=209, last 2 years)
1588 Points ∼77% -17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
989 (953.06min - 988.73max) Points ∼48% -49%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼95% +9%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points ∼94% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 231, n=24)
225 Points ∼93% +7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
211 Points ∼88% 0%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
210 Points ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=198, last 2 years)
202 Points ∼84% -4%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
466 Seconds * ∼100% -74%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 633, n=172, last 2 years)
316 Seconds * ∼68% -18%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
284 Seconds * ∼61% -6%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
268 Seconds * ∼58%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=24)
267 Seconds * ∼57% -0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
242 Seconds * ∼52% +10%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
237 Seconds * ∼51% +12%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54172 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
51756 MIPS ∼96%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
50441 MIPS ∼93% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (37641 - 56758, n=24)
49205 MIPS ∼91% -5%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
45311 MIPS ∼84% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=173, last 2 years)
44706 MIPS ∼83% -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
25564 MIPS ∼47% -51%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
5870 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5520 MIPS ∼94% +7%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
5511 MIPS ∼94% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=24)
5479 MIPS ∼93% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=173, last 2 years)
5231 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
5138 MIPS ∼88%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
4969 MIPS ∼85% -3%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
9580 Points ∼100%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
8470 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
7725 Points ∼81% -19%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=20)
7360 Points ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=171, last 2 years)
7176 Points ∼75% -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
4593 Points ∼48% -52%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
1576 Points ∼100% +7%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
1568 Points ∼99% +7%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1469 Points ∼93%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
1400 Points ∼89% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=20)
1390 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=171, last 2 years)
1308 Points ∼83% -11%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
14.9 fps ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.8 fps ∼99% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=24)
14.2 fps ∼95% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.9 fps ∼93%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.3 fps ∼89% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.4 - 19.8, n=172, last 2 years)
12.3 fps ∼83% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
8.3 fps ∼56% -40%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=164, last 2 years)
54.6 s * ∼100% -14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s * ∼98% -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
50.2 s * ∼92% -5%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
49.2 s * ∼90% -3%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.8 s * ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 50.7, n=24)
46 s * ∼84% +4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
45.8 s * ∼84% +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
Intel Core i5-11300H
0.609 sec * ∼100% -1%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.605 sec * ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=167, last 2 years)
0.582 sec * ∼96% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=24)
0.567 sec * ∼93% +6%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.559 sec * ∼92% +8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.529 sec * ∼87% +13%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼85% +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1922 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
193 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
210 Points
Help

系统性能

在很大程度上要归功于快速的固态硬盘,17英寸机在系统测试中脱颖而出。在PCMark 10中的6,556分使其排名第二,仅次于华硕TUF F17。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6901 Points ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6556 Points ∼95%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6505 Points ∼94% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
6493 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6019 - 6556, n=3)
6351 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=178, last 2 years)
6097 Points ∼88% -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
5705 Points ∼83% -13%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10602 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
10221 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
10213 Points ∼96% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9490 - 10221, n=3)
9961 Points ∼94% -3%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
9695 Points ∼91% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11266, n=176, last 2 years)
9636 Points ∼91% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
9156 Points ∼86% -10%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
9199 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9071 Points ∼99% +4%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8874 Points ∼96% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8723 Points ∼95%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
8721 Points ∼95% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8344 - 8723, n=3)
8569 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5813 - 10066, n=176, last 2 years)
8253 Points ∼90% -5%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9274 Points ∼100% +8%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8684 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8577 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7475 - 8577, n=3)
8150 Points ∼88% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
7907 Points ∼85% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=176, last 2 years)
7888 Points ∼85% -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
6311 Points ∼68% -26%
PCMark 10 Score
6556 points
Help

DPC延迟

低延迟也获得了奖励分。根据LatencyMon工具,Focus 17适用于实时音频和视频编辑。

延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
延迟监测
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
4527 μs * ∼100% -1084%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1398.7 μs * ∼31% -266%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
1369.2 μs * ∼30% -258%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1048.3 μs * ∼23% -174%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
382.2 μs * ∼8%

* ... smaller is better

储存

我们的测试设备是由高性能的三星固态硬盘提供动力。1TB版本的970 Evo Plus超越了大多数竞争的SSD。这款M.2硬盘在读取和写入方面都提供了一流的性能。

Schenker XMG Focus 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-35%
-0%
-46%
-10%
Write 4K
237.6
120.8
-49%
206.1
-13%
107.3
-55%
168.79
-29%
Read 4K
55.94
44.19
-21%
77.76
39%
45.46
-19%
72.04
29%
Write Seq
3012
1518
-50%
2842
-6%
978.3
-68%
Read Seq
2830
1828
-35%
2552
-10%
1255
-56%
Write 4K Q32T1
565.9
492.5
-13%
583.3
3%
578.8
2%
459.47
-19%
Read 4K Q32T1
712.1
390.7
-45%
663.1
-7%
299.6
-58%
473.07
-34%
Write Seq Q32T1
3287
1602
-51%
3014
-8%
977.7
-70%
3129.1
-5%
Read Seq Q32T1
3566
3086
-13%
3556
0%
1977
-45%
3528.8
-1%
AS SSD
-42%
10%
-68%
-0%
Seq Read
2994.79
2601.55
-13%
2858.63
-5%
1703.52
-43%
2837
-5%
Seq Write
2497.93
1217.67
-51%
2693.4
8%
715.57
-71%
1565
-37%
4K Read
48.67
42.31
-13%
68.81
41%
37.77
-22%
55.37
14%
4K Write
86.34
121.98
41%
154.53
79%
65.99
-24%
152.86
77%
4K-64 Read
2043.38
1181.76
-42%
1859.62
-9%
441.17
-78%
1326.97
-35%
4K-64 Write
2421.82
972.08
-60%
1679.81
-31%
734.85
-70%
1922.42
-21%
Access Time Read *
0.063
0.101
-60%
0.043
32%
0.191
-203%
0.035
44%
Access Time Write *
0.043
0.096
-123%
0.028
35%
0.053
-23%
0.028
35%
Score Read
2392
1484
-38%
2214
-7%
649
-73%
1666
-30%
Score Write
2758
1216
-56%
2104
-24%
872
-68%
2232
-19%
Score Total
6345
3394
-47%
5451
-14%
1816
-71%
4695
-26%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-39% / -39%
5% / 5%
-57% / -59%
-5% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3566 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3287 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 712.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 565.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2830 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3012 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 55.94 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 237.6 MB/s

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0180360540720900108012601440162018001980216023402520270028803060324034201815.711831.761869.821875.271876.1118911903.171934.411940.291940.71941.961941.961992.081998.592001.942002.152014.12051.642060.032061.922063.252119.82122.112123.582177.472178.732179.362184.62237.662303.092365.82423.052425.992426.42669.262940.623552.993553.623554.253554.883555.093555.533555.723557.823558.033558.453559.083559.713560.553560.75Tooltip
: Ø2514 (1815.71-3560.75)

图形卡

为了从GeForce RTX 3050 Ti中获得尽可能多的图形性能,制造商为Focus 17提供了75瓦的TGP(包括动态提升)。

然而,事实证明,可怜的视频内存量是有问题的。对于中端GPU来说,4GB已经不符合要求了。在2021年,至少应包括6GB的VRAM。新的游戏,如 死循环在全高清运行时已经需要超过4GB的容量--即使是在最低设置下。Nvidia在这里过于节俭,不必要地限制了GPU的未来性。你也不应该指望RTX 3050 Ti有很高的光线追踪性能。例如,在3DMark的Port Royal测试中的结果,与RTX 3060 相比是很糟糕的,后者经常出现在类似价格的笔记本电脑中。

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=197, last 2 years)
20078 Points ∼100% +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19737 Points ∼98% +35%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18851 Points ∼94% +29%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14815 Points ∼74% +1%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14599 Points ∼73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (12119 - 14815, n=7)
14241 Points ∼71% -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
12736 Points ∼63% -13%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=200, last 2 years)
7681 Points ∼100% +37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7582 Points ∼99% +36%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7175 Points ∼93% +28%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6122 Points ∼80% +9%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5591 Points ∼73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4591 - 6122, n=8)
5565 Points ∼72% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
4888 Points ∼64% -13%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (425 - 8032, n=115, last 2 years)
4856 Points ∼100% +753%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4208 Points ∼87% +640%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
588 Points ∼12% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (569 - 588, n=5)
578 Points ∼12% +2%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
569 Points ∼12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
425 Points ∼9% -25%
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
43575 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
13247 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
5991 points
Help

游戏性能

尽管内存有限,RTX 3050 Ti的速度足以在原生全高清分辨率下流畅地运行大多数游戏,并具有高至最大的细节。只有优化不佳和/或要求极高的游戏,例如 孤岛危机重制版,才会使DirectX 12芯片陷入困境。Focus 17在这方面也明显落后于配备RTX 3060的笔记本电脑。后者的性能大约快30%到40%。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
140.7 fps ∼100% +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (42.1 - 242, n=155, last 2 years)
138 fps ∼98% +38%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
134.4 fps ∼96% +34%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
104.2 (99min - 110max) fps ∼74% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
100 (85min) fps ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91 - 104, n=7)
100 fps ∼71% 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
84.5 (72min) fps ∼60% -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=197, last 2 years)
77.5 fps ∼100% +38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
74 fps ∼95% +31%
MSI Katana GF76 11UE
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
72.6 (61min) fps ∼94% +29%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
58.4 (56min - 60max) fps ∼75% +4%
Schenker XMG Focus 17
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
56.3 (47min) fps ∼73%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.3 - 58.4, n=10)
48.8 fps ∼63% -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-53-54DQ
GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU, i5-11300H
48.7 fps ∼63% -13%

我们检查了显卡在长时间的3D负载下的表现,用角色扮演游戏进行了60分钟的检查。在Witcher 3(Full HD/Ultra)。结果。与CPU的性能类似,GPU的性能也保持相当稳定。

The Witcher 3 FPS diagram

05101520253035404550556065705757565757565756575757575657575657565756575657575657565656565756575656575657565756565657565657565756565756565756565756575657565756565656575656575656575657565656575656555756565756575656565756565757565757565756575657575657565757565757565756575657575657575657565757565756575657575656565756565856575756575657565756575657565756575657565756565657565756575657565756575657575657575657575657575657575657575657565757565757565757575657575657575656565656575656565756565657565656575657565756575657565756575656565756565756565657565756575657575657575756575756575757565757575657575657575757565757565757575756575756565757565756575360575657575657565756575657565756565657575657565756565757565757575657575657565756575657565756575657565757575657575656575657575756575657565756575756575657565756575657565756575657565656565657565756565756575656575656575656575656575656565657565656565756565656565656575656565756565656565556565656565656565657565656565656565656565556565556565556565656565556565656565656565656555656565656555655565556555655565556565556555556555655555655555655555655555655555655565655555655565556555655555654565556555556555556555655555555565555565555565555555655555556555555565555555655555556555555555555555555555555555556545555555555555555555555555555555554555455565455555555555555565258555456555555555555555655555555565455555555565555555555555655555555555655555555565555565555555655555655555655565555555655565555565555565556555655565556555655555655565555565556555556555655565555565556555655555655555556555656555556555655565556555655565655565655555655565655565556555655565655565555565556555655565555565556555556555555565556555655565556555655565556555656555556555655565556555655565554555555545555555555565455555555565456555655555458555555565555565556555655565556565556555656555556555656555656555656565555565556565556555656555555565655555655565656555655565655565555565555565556565556565556565656555555565656555655565656565556565656565655565656555656565556565556565656565556565656555656565556565656565656565656565656575656565556565756565657565657565657565756565756565656565657565656575656565656565657565656575657565657565657565657565656565756565756575657565756565657565656575657565656565756575657565756575754595657565756565657565657565657565757565757565657565757565756575656575657565656565657575656575657575657565657565656565756565656565556565656565656565656565656565656555656565656565656545855575656565756565657565656565756565657565656565756565656575557565656565756565656555656565656565655565656565556565656555656565655565656565656565655565656565556565655565656565655565655565655565656555656565656565656565557565656565657565656565656565756575654595657565657565755575656575656575656565756565657565756565657565756575657565657565756575656565756565756565756565756575656575656575657565756565656575656565656565656565656565656565657555756575657565657565656565756565656565656575656565656565556565657555756565656565656565656565656555756565655565656565656565655565656555655565655565656555656565556565656555656565655565655565655565655565655565556565556555655555655565556555655565655555655