Notebookcheck Logo

申科XMG Neo 15游戏笔记本电脑评测。带有液体冷却端口的Ryzen 6000

请加满油。 申克公司在其Neo 15阵容中推出了一款采用最新AMD Ryzen 6000处理器的新机型,即Ryzen 9 6900HX。这一次,我们还将结合RTX 3070 Ti对这款游戏笔记本电脑进行评估。这款采用Zen架构的CPU在与久经考验的英特尔对应产品的竞争中表现如何?请继续阅读以了解详情。
AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Ryzen (Zen)

基于英特尔的 我们在7月份审查的基于英特尔的Neo 15是一款不寻常的笔记本电脑,它具有连接可选的OASIS冷却系统(单独出售,价格约为199欧元,或198美元),我们也在同一时间进行了测试。

XMG现在已经推出了一个新的Neo 15型号,配备了最新的AMD Ryzen处理器。改用AMD CPU也带来了端口选择等方面的一些其他变化。

那么,与基于英特尔的机型相比,基于AMD的Neo的性能如何?在这篇评论中,我们将测试配备价格稍高的RTX 3070 Ti的变体(其价格仍为2850欧元,或2826美元),并看看硬件变化对笔记本电脑的性能和排放意味着什么。

除了仅仅比较基于AMD和英特尔的Neo 15,我们还将把评测机型与其他配备RTX 3070 Ti的游戏笔记本进行对比,例如 MSI Raider GE67, 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15, Acer Nitro 5MSI Stealth GS66.

XMG Neo 15 (XMG Neo 15 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 150 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), 517.48, Optimus and MUX Switch
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR5-4800
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0A67, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, 960 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset + Microphone, Card Reader: Full SD card reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26.6 x 360.2 x 243.5
Battery
93 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: Full HD webcam (Hello compatible)
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speakers, Keyboard: optomechanical keyboard with per-key RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, Pickup & return
Weight
2.268 kg, Power Supply: 1.043 kg
Price
2877 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
11/2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
88.4 %
07/2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.7 %
07/2022
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.3 %
06/2022
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
84 %
06/2022
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm15.60"2560x1440
84.5 %
02/2022
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg19.8 mm15.60"2560x1440

外壳 - 坚固的键盘甲板,(过于)柔软的下层外壳

对于一台游戏笔记本电脑来说,Neo 15并没有过于华丽的设计。在大多数情况下,其颜色方案从普通的深灰色到黑色不等。显示屏盖和底座部分是由金属制成的,而底部和边框是由软塑料制成的。在盖子的中央有一个XMG的标志。前面的点状LED条确实给设备带来了某种游戏美感。

由于使用了金属,Neo 15感觉非常坚固,特别是在底座部分。笔记本电脑几乎没有任何弯曲,扭曲或弯曲时也不会发出任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。当然,盖子的硬度要低一些。也就是说,显示屏可以承受一些扭曲而不受影响。然而,一个缺点是,指纹会在哑光表面上积累。

不幸的是,塑料下壳非常柔软,可能会发生这种情况:如果你只用一只手在 "错误 "的地方(即右下角的通风口周围)握住设备,这个地方可能会被推到很远,以至于触碰到旋转的风扇。

除此以外,Neo 15拥有出色的装配和加工,感觉非常紧凑和坚固,配备的铰链足够牢固,但不会太硬。

在26.6毫米(1.05英寸)的厚度上,尼奥并没有试图与超薄的 Razer Blade 15.但由于其紧凑的设计,它给人的感觉比实际情况略薄。大多数竞争对手的厚度大致相同;只有 MSI Stealth是相当苗条的。

笔记本电脑的紧凑性也反映在它的尺寸上--其他的笔记本电脑都没有Neo 15所占的深度小。就重量而言,Neo在对比组中处于正中间的位置。只有Stealth轻了100克(0.22磅),而Nitro和MSI GE67都重了约200克(0.44磅)。

尺寸比较

363.5 mm 272.9 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.3 kg360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 267 mm 23.4 mm 2.5 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 248 mm 19.8 mm 2.2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

规格 - 没有Thunderbolt,USB-C端口速度慢

不幸的是,基于AMD的Neo 15上的USB-C端口与英特尔型号的不同。在AMD版本中,你不仅没有得到Thunderbolt,而且USB-C端口只有3.2 Gen2x1类型,而不是Gen2x2。同样也不支持Power Delivery。

从积极的方面看,这款笔记本电脑有两个独立的音频插孔(麦克风+耳机),而且端口在左、右和后面都有很好的安排。XMG OASIS的也位于后部。

后部。电源端口,LAN,HDMI 2.1,USB-C 3.2 Gen2×1(DisplayPort 1.4a,G-SYNC),OASIS连接
后部。电源端口,LAN,HDMI 2.1,USB-C 3.2 Gen2×1(DisplayPort 1.4a,G-SYNC),OASIS连接
右:2个USB-A 3.2 Gen1,SD读卡器
右:2个USB-A 3.2 Gen1,SD读卡器
左侧:耳机插孔、麦克风插孔、USB-A 3.2 Gen2×1
左侧:耳机插孔、麦克风插孔、USB-A 3.2 Gen2×1
前面。LED灯条
前面。LED灯条

SD卡阅读器

传输速度相当慢
传输速度相当慢

读卡器接受普通的SD卡。当你插入SD卡时,大约一半的卡会伸出插槽,因为它没有锁定机制。

该读卡器的传输速度或多或少处于较低水平。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
100.5 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +25%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.2 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
78.9 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (26 - 269, n=93, last 2 years)
122.3 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
88.52 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
83.05 MB/s -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.3 MB/s -7%

连接性

Neo配备了一个英特尔AX200无线模块。虽然这个无线卡支持Wi-Fi 6,但它仍然不能在6GHz频段工作。它能提供良好和稳定的传输速率,但对比中的其他Wi-Fi模块则略微快一些。

可更换的Wi-Fi模块
可更换的Wi-Fi模块
英特尔AX200选项的价格高出14欧元
英特尔AX200选项的价格高出14欧元
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1592 (1234min - 1729max) MBit/s +7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1490 (1385min - 1614max) MBit/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1486 (1366min - 1546max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1482 (962min - 1587max) MBit/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)
1274 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (694 - 1629, n=17)
1257 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1748 (903min - 1835max) MBit/s +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1717 (1477min - 1748max) MBit/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1667 (839min - 1727max) MBit/s +8%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1569 (622min - 1690max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1547 (1419min - 1573max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1406 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (832 - 1722, n=17)
1383 MBit/s -11%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1486 (1366-1546)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1482 (962-1587)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1547 (1419-1573)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1718 (903-1835)

网络摄像头

好处:Neo 15配备了一个全高清网络摄像头。不太好的地方:图像质量比一些720p型号的产品要差(见下面的照片)。

尽管有良好的照明:糟糕的颜色和黑暗的、冲淡的图像
尽管有良好的照明:糟糕的颜色和黑暗的、冲淡的图像
ColorChecker
24.5 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23.7 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
27 ∆E
27.2 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
33.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
26.9 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti): 25.9 ∆E min: 2.47 - max: 36.57 ∆E

安全问题

Neo 15上没有指纹传感器,但是TPM 2.0和Kensington插槽都在船上。

配件和保修

保修选项
保修选项

与许多其他制造商不同,申克公司以不吝惜配件而闻名。例如,盒子里有一个大鼠标垫和一个包含驱动程序的U盘。

该公司提供24个月的保修,包括取货和退货服务,以及购买后头六个月内的快速维修。

维护

塑料底部由总共14颗十字头螺钉固定,其中四颗在液体冷却端口上。当你从背面开始时,非常容易抬起底板。一旦笔记本机箱被打开,你就可以看到两个M.2 SSD插槽、风扇、电池、Wi-Fi模块和两个内存插槽。

笔记本电脑内部
笔记本电脑内部
内存插槽
内存插槽
冷却回路和水的连接
冷却回路和水的连接

输入设备 - 光机械开关

键盘

光电机械键盘几乎占据了15英寸笔记本电脑的整个宽度。这足以容纳全尺寸的按键,甚至旁边还有同样大小的数字键盘。键盘之间的空间不大,但考虑到它们有多大,这并不是一个问题。

键盘有一个非常整洁的布局--所有东西都放在一个长方形内,没有任何凹槽或类似的东西。一方面,这意味着没有一个键是突出的或与其他键隔离的,用户只需要依靠图例和自己的经验来导航键盘。另一方面,所有的东西都在它该在的地方。

由于其适度的键程和清晰的反馈,Neo上的键盘在打字时也相当舒适,因此能够快速打字。打字的声音有点 "哗啦啦",但也不算太糟。这款笔记本电脑还具有每个键的RGB照明,可在黑暗环境中使用。

键盘
键盘
全尺寸的箭头、F和数字键
全尺寸的箭头、F和数字键
每键RGB照明。他们的键盘可能非常容易受到碎屑和灰尘的影响。
每键RGB照明。他们的键盘可能非常容易受到碎屑和灰尘的影响。

触摸板

触摸板
触摸板

触摸板大小适中(约11.6 x 7.4厘米,或4.6 x 2.9英寸),表面光滑,这意味着即使你的手指在触摸板上缓慢滑动也不会出现卡顿现象。左上角有一个微小的LED,指示触摸板是否启用。

集成的点击按钮比我们认为的舒适程度略微偏硬,但它们提供了独特的反馈和清晰的点击声。

显示屏 - 240Hz QHD显示屏,全sRGB覆盖

申克公司在所有型号上使用相同的16:9 QHD IPS面板,分辨率为2,560 x 1,440。该显示屏的峰值亮度为350尼特,这是一个相对较好的水平,使Neo 15领先于微星的Stealth和宏碁的Nitro。

然而,其亮度分布仅为82%,有些低于平均水平。特别是,屏幕底部的亮度明显较低。

对于这个级别的笔记本电脑来说,黑度和对比度都很好。该显示器还具有良好的响应时间,并且不使用PWM。

通过亚光覆盖的颗粒状子像素
通过亚光覆盖的颗粒状子像素
沿着下边缘几乎没有明显的屏幕出血现象
沿着下边缘几乎没有明显的屏幕出血现象
371
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
341
cd/m²
342
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0A67 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 342.8 cd/m² Minimum: 8.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 367 cd/m²
Contrast: 1321:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.31 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 3.28 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
BOE0A67, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ2, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.60
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Sharp LQ156T1JW04 (SHP153C), IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display
-1%
1%
21%
21%
21%
Display P3 Coverage
68.9
68.2
-1%
71.7
4%
96.2
40%
95.6
39%
96.4
40%
sRGB Coverage
97.7
97.2
-1%
89.7
-8%
99.9
2%
99.8
2%
99.7
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
70.4
69.4
-1%
75.2
7%
84.5
20%
85.2
21%
85.6
22%
Response Times
0%
97%
39%
-22%
29%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.4 ?(5.8, 6.6)
12.4 ?(5.8, 6.6)
-0%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
98%
7.86 ?(4.02, 3.84)
37%

4.21 ?(1.98, 2.23)
66%

15.7 ?(7.5, 8.2)
-27%
6 ?(3.2, 2.8)
52%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(4.6, 4.2)
8.8 ?(4.6, 4.2)
-0%
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
95%
7.5 ?(3.89, 3.61)
15%
10.2 ?(6.1, 4.1)
-16%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
5%
PWM Frequency
480.4 ?(100)
Screen
15%
-30%
-35%
-30%
-43%
Brightness middle
370
365
-1%
356.1
-4%
346
-6%
332
-10%
272
-26%
Brightness
343
335
-2%
358
4%
329
-4%
303
-12%
253
-26%
Brightness Distribution
82
81
-1%
99
21%
91
11%
86
5%
87
6%
Black Level *
0.28
0.32
-14%
0.59
-111%
0.29
-4%
0.25
11%
Contrast
1321
1141
-14%
586
-56%
1145
-13%
1088
-18%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.31
1.38
40%
4.83
-109%
3.06
-32%
3.61
-56%
3.73
-61%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.03
2.01
50%
7.94
-97%
5.81
-44%
7.71
-91%
9.43
-134%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.28
1.36
59%
3.1
5%
5.2
-59%
6.5
-98%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.48 89%
2.2 100%
2.12 104%
2.155 102%
2.172 101%
CCT
6206 105%
6412 101%
5938 109%
7021 93%
6724 97%
6485 100%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.22
2.57
0.59
0.98
Total Average (Program / Settings)
5% / 9%
23% / 1%
8% / -5%
-10% / -17%
2% / -17%

* ... smaller is better

该屏幕并不真正适合专业的照片和视频编辑。虽然该显示器有完整的sRGB覆盖,但它只能覆盖大约70%的AdobeRGB和DisplayP3色彩空间。

sRGB
sRGB
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB
显示P3
显示P3

显示屏在开箱时就已经被校准得相当好。尽管Delta E值不是特别低,但即使我们自己手动校准了屏幕,也没有任何改善。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校验
饱和度校验
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.8 ms rise
↘ 6.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在户外使用该设备时,你应该寻找一个阴凉的地方,并确保你是直着看显示屏的。这是因为当以某种角度或在阳光直射下观看时,屏幕内容非常难以阅读。

在树荫下
在树荫下
在阴凉处,屏幕以一定角度观看
在阴凉处,屏幕以一定角度观看
间接阳光
间接阳光
光线直接照射;屏幕以一定角度观看
光线直接照射;屏幕以一定角度观看
典型的IPS面板的广视角:色彩和亮度只有在极端的角度才开始下降
典型的IPS面板的广视角:色彩和亮度只有在极端的角度才开始下降

性能--AMD和英特尔几乎不相上下

GPU选项
GPU选项

在bestware的网站上,你可以找到许多不同的方式来配置Neo 15 M22。但它总是配备相同的面板和AMD处理器。那些想用英特尔CPU代替的人可以看看Neo 15 E22。

笔记本电脑 RTX 3070 Ti与最低端的GPU选项(RTX 3060)相比,我们的评测单位在购买价格上增加了约497欧元(494美元)。RTX 3060).从RTX 3060升级到RTX 3080 Ti,将花费1376欧元(1368美元)。 RTX 3080 Ti.

许多其他组件,如固态硬盘、DDR5内存和Wi-Fi模块,也同样可以升级。

测试条件

控制中心软件提供了几个性能配置文件(平衡、爱好者和超增压)。我们选择了最强大的模式(Overboost),使我们得到了最好的基准结果,尽管Schenker推荐的是中间选项,该选项旨在成为性能和噪音水平之间的最佳妥协。

此外,该软件允许用户手动调整各种参数(如动态提升)以及偏移值。尽管如此,我们还是希望看到在选项中增加一个静音模式。

控制中心主菜单
控制中心主菜单
性能简介
性能简介
一般设置
一般设置

处理器

极端性能模式下的TDP
极端性能模式下的TDP
发烧友模式下的TDP
发烧友模式下的TDP
电池供电的TDP
电池供电的TDP

与Neo 15 E22不同的是,它配备了一个 酷睿i7-12700H,Neo M22采用的是 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX.Zen 3+ CPU有八个核心,可以在4.9 GHz的速度下运行,并同时运行16个线程。该处理器还包含一个 Radeon 680M集成GPU。

当连续循环运行Cinebench时,Ryzen CPU提供了其一贯的性能,在最初几次运行后没有任何下滑。然而,基于英特尔的Neo 15中的Core i7-12700H略微快一些。而这一点自然也适用于 酷睿i9-12900H或甚至ROG Strix中的 酷睿i7-12800HX微星GE67中的Core i7-12800HX。

TDP始终保持在90瓦以下。在 "发烧友 "模式下,用电量略微下降到约85瓦特。

相比之下,当笔记本电脑使用电池供电时,性能有所下降,TDP降低到 "仅仅 "50瓦。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2355 (2309.87-2379.68)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2688 (2667.56-2711.13)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2788 (2732.8-2978.18)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
82.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
79.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
77.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
75.3 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
75.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
71.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
62.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
62.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
22456 (19998.9min - 22456.2max) Points +55%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points +34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
19064 Points +31%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
17940 Points +24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
17626 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
16624 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14512 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9709 - 15100, n=19)
13307 Points -8%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1918 Points +21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
1817 Points +15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1812 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1808 Points +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1803 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1583 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1516 - 1616, n=19)
1565 Points -1%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
8564 Points +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points +32%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
7109 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6741 Points +20%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
6651 Points +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
6404 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5598 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (3742 - 5813, n=19)
5162 Points -8%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
728 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
694 Points +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
693 Points +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
690 Points +11%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
676 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
619 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (595 - 631, n=19)
610 Points -1%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
3383 (3163.31min - 3383.24max) Points +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points +29%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
2978 (2732.8min - 2978.18max) Points +25%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
2844 (2577.65min - 2843.74max) Points +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
2731 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 (2667.56min - 2711.13max) Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2380 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1588 - 2411, n=19)
2163 Points -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points +4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
260 Points +3%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
260 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
251.83 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (241 - 261, n=19)
250 Points -1%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (212 - 357, n=21)
239 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
215 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * +7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
200.1 Seconds * +7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
187 Seconds * +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177.7 Seconds * +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
175.4 Seconds * +18%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
153.1 Seconds * +29%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
76947 MIPS +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
71756 MIPS +13%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
69454 MIPS +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
67680 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
63442 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (49526 - 65336, n=20)
60091 MIPS -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
56454 MIPS -11%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS +5%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
5881 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5848 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5821 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
5820 MIPS 0%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
5804 MIPS 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5090 - 6070, n=20)
5799 MIPS 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
5624 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
14213 Points +38%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
14140 Points +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13161 Points +28%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
13033 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10274 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
10180 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (8313 - 10490, n=21)
9642 Points -6%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
1849 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
1762 Points +10%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1759 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1755 Points +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
1718 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1597 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1523 - 1652, n=21)
1589 Points -1%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
24.9 fps +39%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
21.1 fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.7 fps +16%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
19.6 fps +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
18.2 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
17.9 fps
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)
16.7 fps -7%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
81.7 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)
53.1 s * +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * +40%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
48.2 s * +41%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
42 s * +49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
41.1 s * +50%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.3 s * +51%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
39.7 s * +51%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4874 sec *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)
0.483 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * +3%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
0.459 sec * +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4565 sec * +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4548 sec * +7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.448 sec * +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4316 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
144.73 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.62 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2380 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
251.83 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
93.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
84.3 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
84.1 pt
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
72.1 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
17008 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10950 - 17963, n=20)
15327 KRay/s -10%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
11088 KRay/s -35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9592 KRay/s -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9159 KRay/s -46%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9023 KRay/s -47%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8562 KRay/s -50%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106412 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (71414 - 110797, n=20)
96546 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points -13%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49654 Points -53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42697 Points -60%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41723 Points -61%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
41116 Points -61%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40112 Points -62%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s +22%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3977 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3536 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3471 MB/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (2471 - 3804, n=20)
3301 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3235 MB/s -9%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3192 MB/s -10%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2995 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105546 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104784 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (84185 - 107544, n=20)
100656 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
98607 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98058 Points -7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97910 Points -7%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91366 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13205 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10970 - 13205, n=20)
12630 Points -4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12303 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10220 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9923 Points -25%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9902 Points -25%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9899 Points -25%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58527 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (39164 - 61370, n=20)
52842 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points -19%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31771 Points -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
25718 Points -56%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25690 Points -56%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24769 Points -58%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
24075 Points -59%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117708 MB/s +78%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (54613 - 142360, n=20)
115891 MB/s +75%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s +61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104589 MB/s +58%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99638 MB/s +50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66240 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64966 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60972 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1351 MB/s +92%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s +70%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1188 MB/s +69%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s +60%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1078 MB/s +53%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1069 MB/s +52%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (578 - 911, n=20)
803 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
705 MB/s
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9005 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5798 - 9540, n=20)
8175 KRay/s -9%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6675 KRay/s -26%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5498 KRay/s -39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5337 KRay/s -41%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5237 KRay/s -42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
5011 KRay/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40310 MPixel/s +36%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39921 MPixel/s +35%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39856 MPixel/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
32445 MPixel/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
29677 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (26873 - 30604, n=20)
29389 MPixel/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
20495 MPixel/s -31%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中,Neo 15提供的结果或多或少符合我们的预期。然而,除了摇摇欲坠的宏碁Nitro 5之外,其他竞争对手的速度都比较快,尤其是 MSI Raider GE67华硕ROG Strix.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8042 Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7904 Points +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7582 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7579 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7161 - 7332, n=3)
7227 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7188 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6941 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10919 Points +5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10847 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10708 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10431 - 10934, n=3)
10688 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10586 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10431 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9892 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10424 Points +9%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10023 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9593 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9043 - 9960, n=3)
9532 Points -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9495 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9111 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9024 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12897 Points +28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
12249 Points +22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12007 Points +19%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
11488 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points +13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10165 Points +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9351 - 10817, n=3)
10081 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10074 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2044 Points +26%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1973 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)
1876 Points +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1808 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1788 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1624 - 1743, n=2)
1684 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1624 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1968 Points +24%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1874 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)
1787 Points +12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1748 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1696 Points +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1722, n=2)
1657 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1591 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2115 Points +21%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2089 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2041 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)
2040 Points +17%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1861 Points +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1749 - 1809, n=2)
1779 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1749 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2069 Points +50%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1941 Points +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)
1700 Points +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1693 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1526 Points +10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1382 - 1615, n=2)
1499 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1382 Points
PCMark 10 Score
7188 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62646 MB/s +25%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61994 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61561 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (47938 - 53345, n=20)
50405 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50140 MB/s
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49810 MB/s -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42783 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66478 MB/s +30%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65341 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
65018 MB/s +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57329 MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51131 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (43892 - 53321, n=20)
51062 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45184 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66256 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65252 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64873 MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s +11%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57764 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55326 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (51085 - 57202, n=20)
55188 MB/s 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
44759 MB/s -19%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.6 ns * -9%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.7 ns * -7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns * -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89.7 ns *
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)
88.7 ns * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在打开几个浏览器标签到我们的主页后,我们遇到了第一个DPC问题。在以60 FPS播放我们的4K YouTube视频时,延迟增加。内核驱动被怀疑是这个问题的主要原因。

但至少没有任何丢帧,而且在播放测试视频时,CPU/GPU的使用率非常低。

YouTube测试
YouTube测试
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2181.7 μs * -5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2156 μs * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2068.1 μs *
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1698.6 μs * +18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
892.1 μs * +57%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
814 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

Neo 15可以配置无数的SSD选项。我们的评测单元采用了1TB的三星980 Pro固态硬盘,目前在我们的SSD/HDD基准列表中排名第12位。.即使在很长一段时间内,该驱动器也能保持其出色的性能。

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Sequential Read: 5296MB/s
Sequential Write: 3924MB/s
4K Read: 68.11MB/s
4K Write: 143.25MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2601.35MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2560.4MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.046ms
Access Time Write: 0.028ms
Copy ISO: 2937.66MB/s
Copy Program: 334.98MB/s
Copy Game: 1038.5MB/s
Score Read: 3199Points
Score Write: 3096Points
Score Total: 7860Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
90.4 pt
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.8 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS -8!
WDC PC SN810 1TB
84.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
79.4 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76.8 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
75.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
69.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
63.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4634 (4608.92min - 4633.62max) MB/s +19%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3929 (3604.38min - 3929.22max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3880 (3859.81min - 3880.36max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 - 4315, n=26)
3877 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3705 (3693.25min - 3705.04max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2397 (2152.62min - 2396.66max) MB/s -38%
seq write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4488 (4442.32min - 4488.16max) MB/s +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4412 (4063.44min - 4411.99max) MB/s +9%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4063 (4026.53min - 4062.87max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4051 (4025.48min - 4050.73max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 - 4493, n=26)
3893 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3808 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3185 (2997.88min - 3185.36max) MB/s -21%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7006 (6563.67min - 7005.79max) MB/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6809 (5948.57min - 6809.45max) MB/s +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6702 (6133.86min - 6702.29max) MB/s +7%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6683 (5972.9min - 6683.05max) MB/s +7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 - 6902, n=26)
6544 MB/s +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6357 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6248 (5834.07min - 6247.63max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5263 (5104.74min - 5263.39max) MB/s +6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5239 (5165.29min - 5239.11max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4986 (4942.54min - 4986.4max) MB/s
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4985 (4972.98min - 4985.35max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4970 (4954.68min - 4969.54max) MB/s 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 - 5087, n=26)
4879 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4779 MB/s -4%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
93 (92.3min - 92.97max) MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
86.8 (82.52min - 86.79max) MB/s +12%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (61.1 - 94.3, n=26)
79.9 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.2 (76.43min - 77.18max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
74.7 (73.84min - 74.66max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
55.7 (54.2min - 55.72max) MB/s -28%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
294 (279.47min - 294.26max) MB/s +88%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
275 (263.41min - 275.06max) MB/s +75%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
239 (239.08min - 239.49max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +43%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (132.2 - 311, n=26)
217 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
156.7 (155.32min - 156.74max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
153.4 (152.53min - 153.37max) MB/s -2%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4468 MB/s
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4176 (4172.05min - 4175.71max) MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3975 (3854.22min - 3974.57max) MB/s -11%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (895 - 4483, n=26)
3197 MB/s -28%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3032 (3023.35min - 3032.48max) MB/s -32%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s -42%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
926 (908.86min - 925.85max) MB/s -79%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3841 (3812.52min - 3841.45max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3509 (3396.26min - 3509.01max) MB/s -9%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3491 (3437.82min - 3491.16max) MB/s -9%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (345 - 4383, n=26)
2341 MB/s -39%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2286 (2167.11min - 2286.44max) MB/s -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2147 MB/s -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
358 (345.46min - 358.45max) MB/s -91%
AS SSD
Score Total
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9031 Points +15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8980 Points +14%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
8556 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7860 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3394 - 9322, n=24)
7334 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7266 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1923 - 13854, n=184, last 2 years)
6784 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5629 Points -28%
Score Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3482 Points +9%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3469 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3378 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3199 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2885 Points -10%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1501 - 3512, n=24)
2811 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (528 - 4721, n=184, last 2 years)
2489 Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1501 Points -53%
Score Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3999 Points +29%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3799 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3462 Points +12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3325 Points +7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1130 - 4194, n=24)
3159 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3096 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=184, last 2 years)
3089 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2968 Points -4%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5588.43 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5563.48 MB/s +5%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5450 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5296 MB/s
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5282.63 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5065 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1759 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
4937 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (545 - 5692, n=24)
4838 MB/s -9%
Seq Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4795 MB/s +22%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4179.97 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4045.87 MB/s +3%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3975.65 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3924 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
3647 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1613 - 4136, n=24)
3490 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2678 MB/s -32%
4K Read
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
86.37 MB/s +27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.33 MB/s +21%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
81.9 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
81.3 MB/s +19%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (53.5 - 86.8, n=24)
72 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
71.34 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
68.11 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=184, last 2 years)
66.7 MB/s -2%
4K Write
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
302.8 MB/s +111%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
248.96 MB/s +74%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
240.81 MB/s +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=184, last 2 years)
210 MB/s +47%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
203.6 MB/s +42%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (134.6 - 254, n=24)
188.8 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
181.62 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
143.25 MB/s
4K-64 Read
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2855 MB/s +10%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2854.25 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2740.24 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2601.35 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2243.61 MB/s -14%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (915 - 2938, n=24)
2234 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 3475, n=184, last 2 years)
1923 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
922.98 MB/s -65%
4K-64 Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3345.62 MB/s +31%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3160.56 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3012.05 MB/s +18%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (557 - 3708, n=24)
2622 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2560.4 MB/s
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2542 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=184, last 2 years)
2517 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2346 MB/s -8%
Access Time Read
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.075 ms * -63%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.07 ms * -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=182, last 2 years)
0.05422 ms * -18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.046 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.042 ms * +9%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.022 - 0.073, n=24)
0.04075 ms * +11%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.029 ms * +37%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.022 ms * +52%
Access Time Write
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.054 ms * -93%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=184, last 2 years)
0.04705 ms * -68%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.018 - 0.089, n=24)
0.03363 ms * -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.028 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * +21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.017 ms * +39%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.012 ms * +57%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6462 (6111.88-6479.82)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5118 (1464.03-6680.48)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø3862 (2977.33-7025.67)

图形卡

图形卡选项
图形卡选项

我们的评测装置有一个 GeForce RTX 3070 TiTGP目标为150瓦,包括动态提升。这些值可以在控制中心手动调整。另外,你也可以在Neo 15上安装各种GPU,包括 RTX 3060RTX 3080 Ti.

正如我们所预期的那样,评测单位的GPU得分比普通的RTX 3070 Ti高出5%至10%。微星 微星GE67是对比中唯一明显更快的设备。虽然 Strix Scar往往比Neo的得分高,但性能差异大多可以忽略不计,大约只有2%。

Neo 15在使用电池运行时失去了大量的3D性能。例如,当我们拔掉笔记本的电源并再次运行Fire Strike ,物理和图形得分分别只有20,021和5,238,而不是Neo与电源连接时获得的26,338和28,105。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Time Spy
Time Spy
Cloud Gate
Cloud Gate
Fire Strike,插入了
Fire Strike,插入了
Fire Strike蓄电池,在电池上
Fire Strike蓄电池,在电池上
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
98.9 pt
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
98.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
91.3 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
87.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
86.2 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
83.6 pt
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
78.8 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
78.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
42212 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
40518 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=229, last 2 years)
40173 Points +4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
39673 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
38809 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
36842 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points -7%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32525 Points -16%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
177275 Points +33%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
168590 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
135868 Points +2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
134948 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
133665 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
124813 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
90822 Points -32%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
31096 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
30976 Points +10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
29292 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=233, last 2 years)
29268 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
28105 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
27447 Points -2%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25169 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12055 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=231, last 2 years)
11960 Points +14%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
11938 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
11197 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10495 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10356 Points -1%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9758 Points -7%
3DMark 11 Performance
30616 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
57616 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24908 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10520 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
380 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)
275 Seconds * +28%
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
48 Seconds * -100%
Dell G16 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
31 Seconds * -29%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
28 Seconds * -17%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25 Seconds * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
24 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=176, last 2 years)
23.3 Seconds * +3%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
83 Seconds * -113%
Dell G16 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
52 Seconds * -33%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
41 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
40 Seconds * -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)
39.5 Seconds * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
39 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
447 Seconds * -24%
Lenovo IdeaPad Gaming 3 15IAH7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i5-12500H
385 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
360 Seconds *
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
339 Seconds * +6%
Dell G16 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
326 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=195, last 2 years)
317 Seconds * +12%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

Neo 15基本上能够流畅地运行所有测试的游戏,即使在QHD分辨率和最大设置下也是如此。只有在《毁灭之光2》(35 FPS)等游戏中,当光线追踪设置设置为高时,笔记本电脑才开始出现一些问题。

在比较中,游戏测试结果与3DMark的测试结果相似:Neo中的GPU在很大程度上(但并不总是)比普通的RTX 3070 Ti表现更好。也就是说,华硕ROG Strix Scar,特别是微星GE67的速度比Neo快。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
242.8 fps +25%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
223.3 (204min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 449, n=165, last 2 years)
218 fps +12%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
209 (173min, 174.1P1) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
195 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (139.7 - 226, n=27)
188.8 fps -3%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
166 (146min) fps -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
162.7 (31.9min, 45.3P0.1, 89P1) fps -17%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
127.8 fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years)
116.1 fps +6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.7 (105min) fps +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (95min, 95P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)
102.4 fps -7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 (18.6min, 23.1P0.1, 56.2P1) fps -10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.4 (78min) fps -18%
Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (35.8 - 174, n=26, last 2 years)
83.9 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (66 - 85.5, n=7)
73.1 fps -11%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
69.6 (34.6min, 35.5P0.1, 63.5P1) fps -16%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (31.1 - 121, n=20, last 2 years)
65.6 fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (46.7 - 60, n=7)
51.9 fps -12%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
51.3 (26min, 43.2P0.1, 47.2P1) fps -13%
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 83.9, n=21, last 2 years)
42.2 fps +21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (28.7 - 54.9, n=6)
36.6 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35 fps
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31.1 (4.28min, 6.05P0.1, 19.2P1) fps -11%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
142 fps +19%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
138 (117min) fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 232, n=113, last 2 years)
134.4 fps +13%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (113min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (99 - 147, n=23)
129.6 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
119 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99 (80min) fps -17%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
132 fps +20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
130 (102min) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=123, last 2 years)
125.8 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91 - 138, n=25)
120.4 fps +9%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (98min) fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110 fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91 (67min) fps -17%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116 fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 194, n=91, last 2 years)
113.4 fps +11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
107 (95min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (77 - 111, n=15)
97.4 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77 (55min) fps -25%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
178.1 (3.97min, 142.9P1) fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
177.7 (3.45min, 125P1) fps +14%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
172.2 (3.94min, 111.1P1) fps +10%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
170 (3.61min, 111P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (80 - 181.9, n=28)
165.5 fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.3 - 187.1, n=180, last 2 years)
163.2 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
156.2 (4.41min, 90.9P1) fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
152.5 (3.87min, 90.9P1) fps -2%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
123.9 (6.53min, 76.9P1) fps +27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
123.1 (5.36min, 83.3P1) fps +26%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
122 (6.11min, 90.9P1) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44 - 123.9, n=36)
106.7 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years)
106.7 fps +9%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105 (21.6min, 71.4P1) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.6 (6.57min, 66.7P1) fps
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95 (14min, 62.5P1) fps -3%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110.8 (4.43min, 71.4P1) fps +19%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.7 (11.2min, 76.9P1) fps +17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
101.9 (4.88min, 66.7P1) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (5.61 - 160.6, n=135, last 2 years)
101.8 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (72.7 - 108.7, n=22)
92.9 fps 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81.8 (30.2min, 58.8P1) fps -12%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
235 (5min, 176P1) fps +14%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
235 (75.3min, 181.1P1) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (17.5 - 465, n=188, last 2 years)
230 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
225 (88.1min, 166.3P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
206 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (112 - 248, n=27)
203 fps -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
198.2 (99min, 137.5P1) fps -4%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
175 (95.7min, 131P1) fps -15%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
207 (107.5min, 154.2P1) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=223, last 2 years)
205 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
201 (40.6min, 148.9P1) fps +6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
196.2 (70.2min, 148.7P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
189 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (109 - 221, n=37)
179.9 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
178.3 (43.7min, 126.3P1) fps -6%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
153 (77.1min, 115P1) fps -19%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (79.8 - 322, n=135, last 2 years)
179.1 fps +25%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
154.1 (113.5min, 117.6P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
148.5 (30.1min, 117.7P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
146 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
143 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (110.7 - 160.5, n=21)
137.4 fps -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
136.7 (20min, 96.9P1) fps -4%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
164.8 (145.2min) fps +42%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158 (139.6min) fps +36%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155.9 (136.3min) fps +34%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
155.3 (136.9min) fps +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.9 - 244, n=234, last 2 years)
151.8 fps +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (75.4 - 170.2, n=38)
142.8 fps +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
133.3 (119.3min) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
116.3 (103.2min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
158.4 (137.8min) fps +39%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
151 (132.8min) fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
149.9 (129.9min) fps +31%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
147.7 (130.1min) fps +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=235, last 2 years)
142.1 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)
135.6 fps +19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
126.8 (112.5min) fps +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
114.1 (99.4min) fps
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
133.4 fps +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.7 - 193.1, n=231, last 2 years)
127.3 fps +34%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122.4 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (57.3 - 145.7, n=36)
118.4 fps +25%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117 fps +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
109.8 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
94.9 fps
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.9 fps +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=240, last 2 years)
101.2 fps +30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.6 - 116.9, n=37)
95.5 fps +23%
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.6 fps +18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
89.7 fps +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
77.6 fps

在Witcher 3 ,帧率基本稳定。但是我们注意到,GPU温度(平行记录)在测试期间持续上升,并没有真正稳定下来。这表明,在长时间运行高要求的游戏后,GPU可能开始出现热节流现象,尽管在一小时的测试中没有发生这种情况。GPU的平均用电量为120瓦。

在比较中,即使是基于英特尔的Neo与RTX 3080 Ti在相同的设置下也没有大幅提高。一般来说,基于英特尔的Neo中极其昂贵的GPU很难用它提供的性能收益来证明其高价。根据游戏和设置的不同,它只领先约1%至25%。

GPU时钟速度
GPU时钟速度
温度
温度
消耗功率
消耗功率

Witcher 3 FPS chart

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø104.8 (99-112)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø109.2 (98-119)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø110.9 (105-117)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø109 (96-120)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 176.6 170.3 156.2 97.6 93
The Witcher 3 (2015) 195 110
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 135.9 123.1 116.3 114.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 109.5 94.9 77.6
Far Cry 5 (2018) 119 110 102
Strange Brigade (2018) 305 224 206 189 143
Dying Light 2 (2022) 82.5 59

排放 - 怠速时比Intel Neo更冷

噪声排放

虽然笔记本没有静音模式,但里面的风扇在空闲时经常不转。有趣的是,尽管有一个较弱的GPU,基于AMD的Neo在负载下并不像基于Intel的同类产品那样保持安静。在竞争对手中,只有宏碁Nitro 5稍微安静一些。但话说回来,它的性能也不如Neo。

当风扇不工作时,机箱里会发出柔和但高调的哔哔声。虽然这种噪音在风扇运转时听不到,但在安静的环境中还是很烦人的。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 25.82 / 27.3 dB(A)
Load
42.7 / 56 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.835.239.82534.625.934.63149.828.549.8403434.6345028.131.528.16333.119.633.18026.916.726.910028.520.928.512529.518.629.516032.615.732.620036.615.136.625036.51636.531535.711.735.740037103750040.18.340.163041.37.941.380040.77.840.7100043.58.343.5125044944160047.59.247.5200045.69.745.625004410.344315044.510.844.5400044.611.344.6500044.711.444.7630040.911.440.980003811.5381000034.711.534.71250031.211.331.21600027.310.527.3SPL55.722.655.7N10.30.410.3median 40.1median 11.3median 40.1Delta62.86hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Noise
-1%
3%
-30%
-8%
-9%
off / environment *
23
23
-0%
22.7
1%
26.86
-17%
26
-13%
24
-4%
Idle Minimum *
23
23
-0%
22.9
-0%
39.07
-70%
26
-13%
31
-35%
Idle Average *
25.82
26.39
-2%
22.9
11%
39.07
-51%
29
-12%
32
-24%
Idle Maximum *
27.3
26.39
3%
22.9
16%
39.07
-43%
33
-21%
35
-28%
Load Average *
42.7
45.52
-7%
44.4
-4%
53.34
-25%
47
-10%
48
-12%
Witcher 3 ultra *
56
55.89
-0%
55.7
1%
56.6
-1%
53
5%
43
23%
Load Maximum *
56
55.89
-0%
57.4
-3%
56.6
-1%
53
5%
48
14%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在空闲状态下,机箱温度仍然比基于英特尔的Neo与RTX 3080 Ti的温度更舒适。然而,这一优势在负载下几乎消失了。对比组中的其他设备可以得到与Neo差不多的温度。但在所有东西中,正是性能高但略显笨重的微星GE67比其他游戏笔记本运行得更凉爽。

掌托不曾变得令人不快,WASD键也是如此。热量主要集中在中间和靠近显示屏的区域。薄薄的塑料底板有许多通风口,导致它的温度大大高于键盘甲板。

Max. Load
 34 °C41 °C33 °C 
 34 °C41 °C29 °C 
 30 °C29 °C26 °C 
Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 33 °C
52 °C57 °C52 °C
34 °C54 °C41 °C
24 °C24 °C24 °C
Maximum: 57 °C
Average: 40.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42 °C | Room Temperature 18.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
-20%
11%
-14%
-9%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
41
44
-7%
34.4
16%
42.6
-4%
48
-17%
54
-32%
Maximum Bottom *
57
56
2%
42
26%
50.2
12%
51
11%
59
-4%
Idle Upper Side *
28
38
-36%
24
14%
36.2
-29%
34
-21%
26
7%
Idle Bottom *
30
41
-37%
33.2
-11%
40.2
-34%
33
-10%
27
10%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

与许多基于英特尔的系统不同,Neo的CPU时钟速度在我们一小时的压力测试中能够保持相当稳定。核心在4.1GHz开始测试,没有低于3.9GHz。它们还设法偶尔接近初始值。核心温度保持在恒定的95°C(203°F),平均用电量为64瓦特。

相比之下,GPU的数值波动更大。在最初以1.7GHz的速度运行后,GPU有时会下降到1GHz,然后再返回到初始时钟速度。在测试期间,VRAM速度是恒定的。GPU温度稳定在78°C(172°F)左右,而功耗很少达到150瓦的目标,平均约为114瓦。

压力测试。CPU时钟速度
压力测试。CPU时钟速度
压力测试。CPU的耗电量
压力测试。CPU的耗电量
压力测试。CPU温度
压力测试。CPU温度
压力测试。GPU时钟速度
压力测试。GPU时钟速度
压力测试。GPU的耗电量
压力测试。GPU的耗电量
压力测试。GPU温度
压力测试。GPU温度
压力测试期间的散热情况(上)。
压力测试期间的散热情况(上)。
压力测试期间的散热情况(底部)。
压力测试期间的散热情况(底部)。
压力测试期间的充电器
压力测试期间的充电器
Witcher 3 期间的散热情况(顶部)
Witcher 3 期间的散热情况(顶部)
Witcher 3 期间的散热情况(底部)
Witcher 3 期间的散热情况(底部)
在此过程中的充电器Witcher 3
在此过程中的充电器Witcher 3
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
系统空闲 -- -- 55 44
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 3.9 1,522 95 77
Witcher 3 应力 3.1 1,550 67 83

发言人

向下发射的扬声器只能获得适度的音量,几乎没有任何低音。
向下发射的扬声器只能获得适度的音量,几乎没有任何低音。
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203935.2392539.325.939.33142.628.542.64035.834.635.85028.131.528.16333.719.633.78028.816.728.810027.820.927.812534.318.634.316041.815.741.820045.415.145.425048.91648.931551.111.751.140056.91056.950065.68.365.6630717.97180072.67.872.61000708.370125067.4967.4160060.79.260.7200066.69.766.6250062.610.362.6315060.710.860.7400063.711.363.7500066.611.466.6630065.211.465.2800061.711.561.71000057.411.557.41250053.511.353.51600055.110.555.1SPL78.322.678.3N420.442median 60.7median 11.3median 60.7Delta8.62.88.634231917.718.525.71821.822.929.628.338.327.448.233.156.621.557.223.55627.859.621.86120.962.419.365.919.267.614.867.31470.612.770.312.77212.27112.671.612.870.512.267.512.662.712.76112.859.612.862.512.556.912.554.511.653.226.980.50.948.4median 12.8median 62.53.56.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.26 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - XMG Neo 15有很好的电池寿命

消耗功率

笔记本电脑在空闲时使用13到20瓦的功率,这取决于所选择的性能配置文件和显示亮度。在我们的比较中,这充其量是一个平均结果。

当运行Witcher 3 ,系统消耗了大约200瓦的功率--比稍快的华硕ROG Strix多出一小部分。

在压力测试期间,我们测量了260瓦的临时峰值功率使用。笨重的280瓦充电器可以轻松处理笔记本电脑的电源需求,特别是考虑到在压力测试过程中,功耗稳定在210瓦。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.09 / 4.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13 / 17 / 20 Watt
Load midlight 89 / 260 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS-level, 2560x1440, 15.60
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS-Level, 2560x1440, 15.60
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-14%
-20%
5%
3%
3%
-19%
-14%
Idle Minimum *
13
15
-15%
16.1
-24%
7.56
42%
7
46%
11
15%
14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27)
-9%
Idle Average *
17
18
-6%
17.1
-1%
13.5
21%
15
12%
16
6%
19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27)
-17%
Idle Maximum *
20
18
10%
26.6
-33%
16.87
16%
24
-20%
23
-15%
26.2 ?(14.3 - 47.3, n=27)
-31%
Load Average *
89
123
-38%
116.3
-31%
128.9
-45%
124
-39%
110
-24%
125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27)
-41%
Witcher 3 ultra *
200
234
-17%
237
-19%
196.2
2%
195.1
2%
151
24%
Load Maximum *
260
301
-16%
291.1
-12%
274.86
-6%
220
15%
230
12%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240255Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø200 (192.94-225.82)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø223 (151.92-260.36)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø135.2 (131.53-158.24)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø133.5 (130.82-135.34)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø180.3 (173.85-184.8)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø193.3 (191.07-195.82)

电池寿命

申克公司为这台笔记本电脑配备了96Wh的电池。除了宏碁Nitro之外,对比中的所有设备都有类似的大电池。

相对于竞争对手,XMG Neo 15的电池寿命非常出色。看来申克公司对电源模式的微调工作做得很好。

在任何情况下,在屏幕亮度调低的情况下,这台笔记本电脑为我们提供了近11小时的网络浏览和视频播放。即使在最大屏幕亮度下,我们仍然能够通过Wi-Fi上网8.5小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
10h 53min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
8h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
10h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 38min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti)
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 57.5 Wh
MSI Stealth GS66 12UGS
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-24%
-9%
-30%
-49%
-26%
-32%
H.264
643
428
-33%
510
-21%
283
-56%
WiFi v1.3
653
464
-29%
336
-49%
501.4
-23%
234
-64%
324
-50%
Load
98
88
-10%
128
31%
52
-47%
72
-27%
96
-2%
Reader / Idle
505
340
467
Witcher 3 ultra
70

Pros

+ 液体冷却连接
+ 坚固的键盘甲板
+ 易于维护
+ 伟大的键盘
+ 许多手动性能设置
+ 怠速时比基于英特尔的Neo更冷
+ 绝佳的电池寿命

Cons

- 小写字母太软
- 没有Thunderbolt
- 糟糕的全高清网络摄像头

结论 - 英特尔还是AMD?这是一个偏好的问题。

XMG Neo 15是由Schenker为这次审查提供的。
XMG Neo 15是由Schenker为这次审查提供的。

即使采用AMD处理器,Neo 15也是一款出色的游戏笔记本电脑。在空闲状态下,基于AMD的Neo比基于英特尔的同类产品运行得更冷,电池寿命更长。反过来说,它的CPU性能略低,而且缺乏对Thunderbolt的支持。消费者需要决定什么对他们更重要。

这款笔记本电脑的游戏性能处于中上水平,但可以使用广泛的手动设置来进一步提高。

超强的电池寿命给我们留下了深刻的印象,但在某些方面却略显纠结。我们喜欢显示屏和键盘甲板上使用的坚固的金属材料,但下壳太软,我们不喜欢。该设备有一个全高清网络摄像头,但它提供的图像质量很差,许多720p的型号根本能做得更好。这里仍有一点改进的余地。也就是说,这是一个相对较小的批评。

配备AMD Ryzen的XMG Neo 15是一款性能优异的游戏笔记本电脑,没有任何重大的缺点,它有一个可选外部水冷的连接。尽管如此,这款笔记本电脑上的许多伟大想法中的一些仍然可以使用一些改进。

如果你正在寻找替代品,我们特别推荐 Msi ge6 hx 12ugs它在几乎所有的性能测试中都领先,但在排放方面也没有差多少。你也可以看看 华硕ROG Strix Scar这款笔记本电脑与Neo 15并驾齐驱。

价格和可用性

Neo 15可以在XMG自己的网上商店(bestware.com)进行多种配置。我们的评测模型,价格为2877欧元(2850美元),来自该网站.选择RTX 3060而不是RTX 3070 Ti,你可以节省近500欧元(495美元)!如果你在比较网站上看了一下,你就会发现,你的价格比RTX 3070 Ti高。如果你在比较网站上寻找,你可能有时也会发现笔记本电脑的价格略低。

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Ryzen 9 6900HX, RTX 3070 Ti) - 10/26/2022 v7
Christian Hintze

Chassis
84 / 98 → 86%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 84%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
88 / 95 → 93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 90%
Noise
72 / 90 → 80%
Audio
70%
Camera
37 / 85 → 44%
Average
78%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 申科XMG Neo 15游戏笔记本电脑评测。带有液体冷却端口的Ryzen 6000
Christian Hintze, 2022-11- 3 (Update: 2022-11- 3)