申克 XMG 酷睿 16 游戏笔记本评测--联想Legion Pro 5 16 的真正竞争对手

Name: SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Brand: SCHENKER

核心游戏业务。 申克的酷睿 16（同方 GM6XG7X）是一款出色的游戏笔记本电脑，由于配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 和 RTX 4070（或 RTX 4060）以及可选机械键盘等一系列其他出色功能，它无需躲避任何中高端竞争对手。

Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/11/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Zen 4

我们测试的最后一款 XMG Core 是XMG Core 15(88 %)。RTX 3060.现在，申克又推出了 16 英寸版本的酷睿。我们将看看除了屏幕尺寸之外的所有变化。

我们将把酷睿 16 与LenovoLegion Pro 5 16 Gen 8 ，Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 ，HP Omen Transcend 16 ，MSI Stealth 16 Studio 和HP Victus 16 进行比较。

Test device courtesy of Bestware

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

XMG Core 16

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS 8 x 3.8 - 5.1 GHz, Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 140 W TDP, Geforce 537.13, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, 2x 16 GB SK Hynix DDR5-5600

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0AF0 (), IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, 1024 GB

, 860 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset jack, Card Reader: Full SD Card Reader

Networking

Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 26.1 x 358.4 x 266.8

Battery

99 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: Full-HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo Speaker, Keyboard: mechanical keyboard with RGB backlight, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, Pickup and Return

Weight

2.39 kg, Power Supply: 628 g

Price

2230 Euro

Links

SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.2 %	10/2023	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	26.1 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 %	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.1 %	06/2023	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	27.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
87.9 %	08/2023	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.8 %	07/2023	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2 kg	19.95 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
85.1 %	09/2023	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	24 mm	16.10"	1920x1080

外壳与连接 - 时尚的 Core 16

这款笔记本电脑采用了申克典型的时尚风格--一切都保持深灰色。较硬的底座和较软的底板由塑料制成，闪亮的显示屏盖由金属制成。后者有点容易沾染指纹。盖子可以打开 135 度。

一切看起来都相当稳定，做工也不错。左侧底座仅在我们第一次尝试扭动时发出嘎吱声。

它的尺寸和重量一般，与LenovoLegion Pro 5 16 相仿。

这款游戏笔记本包含所有最重要的端口，包括一个完整的 SD 读卡器。遗憾的是，USB-C 端口不支持 Thunderbolt、Power Delivery 或 DisplayPort。对于后者，笔记本电脑配备了专用的 MiniDisplayPort。该设备无法通过 USB-C 接口充电，左侧的 USB-A 接口仍为 2.0 类型！

之前提到的 SD 读卡器速度非常慢，比所有前代产品和竞争对手都慢。至少它配备了一个读卡器。

英特尔 AX200 支持 WiFi 6，但仅限于 5 GHz 频率。它的传输速率不错，而且相对稳定。

尺寸比较

HP Victus 16-r0077ng Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) HP Omen Transcend 16 MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	158 (154.8^min - 166.31^max) MB/s +355%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=98, last 2 years)	97.8 MB/s +182%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.3 MB/s +131%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	34.7 (33.73^min - 34.77^max) MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	180.68 MB/s +407%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)	121.1 MB/s +240%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	87.5 MB/s +146%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	35.62 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1679 (1470^min - 1802^max) MBit/s +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1494 (1257^min - 1548^max) MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1170^min - 1766^max) MBit/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1325 (977^min - 1480^max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1263 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (694 - 1629, n=17)	1257 MBit/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1173 (839^min - 1366^max) MBit/s -21%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921	714 (679^min - 745^max) MBit/s -52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1725 (1685^min - 1740^max) MBit/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1583 (1176^min - 1662^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1438 (767^min - 1513^max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1397 MBit/s -12%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (832 - 1722, n=17)	1383 MBit/s -13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1364 (675^min - 1404^max) MBit/s -14%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1339 (1216^min - 1449^max) MBit/s -15%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng MediaTek MT7921	726 (714^min - 732^max) MBit/s -54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1674 (1337^min - 1789^max) MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1612 (1573^min - 1655^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1490 (1301^min - 1671^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)	1472 MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1446 (1206^min - 1531^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (1006 - 1696, n=5)	1388 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1726 (876^min - 1760^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1585 (1559^min - 1625^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (1347 - 1700, n=5)	1536 MBit/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1513 (1467^min - 1553^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)	1511 MBit/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1446 (731^min - 1469^max) MBit/s

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1490 (1301-1671)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1674 (1337-1789)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1585 (1559-1625)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1696 (876-1760)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1470-1802)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1725 (1685-1740)

ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23): 7.31 ∆E min: 1.12 - max: 15.96 ∆E

输入设备 - 机械或薄膜按键

在这款笔记本电脑上，你可以选择机械键盘（如我们的测试机型）或 "静音薄膜键盘"。这两种键盘都带有 RGB 背光，但只有机械键盘才有独立的 RGB 灯光按键。静音薄膜键盘只有单区 RGB 灯光。

机械键盘只有功能键采用了更安静的薄膜开关。所有其他按键都有很好的压力点，并提供清晰的反馈。你必须喜欢打字时的巨大噪音，而且它肯定不适合带进图书馆。

像往常一样，申克采用了非常整洁的布局，没有任何装饰。包括数字键盘在内的所有按键都排成六排。这意味着您可以非常容易地找到所有按键--通常按键都很小（约 1.45 x 1.45 厘米）。

触摸板虽然有点小（约 11.7 x 7.2 厘米），但却非常光滑，即使你的手指还没有完全干透。双击左上角可以（取消）激活触摸板，一个微型 LED 灯会显示触摸板的当前状态。集成的点击按钮会给你适当的反馈，但声音不会太大。有时，点击会有点卡住，也就是说，当你松开拖放后，它不会立即释放。

显示屏 - 著名的 16:10 1,600p IPS 面板

从外观上看，申克公司在其所有 16 英寸机型上都使用了相同的 1:10 240Hz 雾面显示屏，分辨率为 1600p。这意味着我们在申克 Vision 16 Pro和XMG Neo 16.

这块屏幕无疑达到了很好的效果。它的亮度为 350 尼特，对比度略高于 1,000:1。sRGB 显示速度足够快，我们没有注意到任何 PWM。你可以看到一些背光出血现象，但并不严重。

我们注意到的一点是，通过特殊按键改变亮度只有在再次松开按键时才会生效，这有点恼人。


352 cd/m²	374 cd/m²	337 cd/m²
352 cd/m²	376 cd/m²	336 cd/m²
368 cd/m²	382 cd/m²	349 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE0AF0 () tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 382 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 358.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: 1139:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.88
ΔE Greyscale 3.57 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	HP Omen Transcend 16 AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	HP Victus 16-r0077ng CMN162D, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Display		3%	0%	24%	21%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	68.3	70.4 3%	67.9 -1%	99.2 45%	96.4 41%	66.7 -2%
sRGB Coverage	98.6	99.6 1%	99.1 1%	100 1%	99.7 1%	98 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	72.6 4%	69.9 0%	87.6 26%	84.8 22%	69 -1%
Response Times		5%	21%	-214%	41%	-13%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)	7 ?(3.2, 3.8) 47%	11 ?(5, 6) 17%	26.4 ?(15, 11.4) -100%	4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2) 67%	13.3 ?(6, 7.3) -1%
Response Time Black / White *	6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)	9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2) -38%	5 ?(2, 3) 24%	28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6) -327%	5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4) 15%	8.2 ?(4.5, 3.7) -24%
PWM Frequency				3506 ?(100)
Screen		26%	18%	195%	-30%	17%
Brightness middle	376	355.3 -6%	520 38%	791.1 110%	424 13%	308 -18%
Brightness	358	340 -5%	494 38%	800 123%	411 15%	285 -20%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	91 3%	95 8%	88 0%	85 -3%
Black Level *	0.33	0.32 3%	0.39 -18%	0.04 88%	0.37 -12%	0.25 24%
Contrast	1139	1110 -3%	1333 17%	19778 1636%	1146 1%	1232 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.74	1.13 59%	1.94 29%	4.37 -59%	3.04 -11%	1.3 53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	6.78	2.78 59%	5.62 17%	10.39 -53%	7.5 -11%	2.76 59%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.88	0.32 64%	0.74 16%	1.04 -18%	3.04 -245%	0.92 -5%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.57	1.4 61%	2.94 18%	6.5 -82%	4.34 -22%	1.7 52%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.24 ^98%	2.37 ^93%	2.28 ^96%	2.32 ^95%	2.167 ^102%
CCT	7246 ^90%	6372 ^102%	6443 ^101%	6000 ^108%	6952 ^93%	6767 ^96%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 18%	13% / 14%	2% / 100%	11% / -9%	1% / 9%

* ... smaller is better

通过使用 Xrite 色彩测量设备和 Calman 软件，我们可以大幅提高屏幕的色彩表现（但并非完全理想），使色彩和灰度 DeltaE 值（标准偏差）降至 1。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 2.5 ms rise
6.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.1 ms rise
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在室外，当你正对着显示屏时，在阴暗处也能很好地阅读。

性能 - 强劲的 RTX 4070 和 Ryzen 7

......（英文RTX 4070是酷睿 16 成为游戏笔记本电脑的关键所在。专业人士和创意人士可能也会对这款设备感兴趣--不过，对于这些人来说，sRGB 色彩空间可能还不够，DisplayP3 也未涵盖在内。

与更普遍的英特尔 CPU 组合相比，该设备安装了AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS。安装。高端 CPU 加上 32GB 内存和显卡，实际上使这款设备更像是一款高端游戏笔记本电脑。几乎所有当前流行的游戏都能在其 1600p 原生分辨率下流畅运行，并获得最佳细节。

在申克的订购网站bestware.com，你可以对笔记本电脑进行大量配置，选择不同的固态硬盘和内存制造商，等等。您需要记住这一点，因为我们的测试只考虑了我们的具体配置。

测试条件

申克设备的控制中心可让您设置性能预设值以及手动设置单个性能参数。这意味着您可以根据个人需求改变游戏笔记本电脑的性能。其他设置也是如此，例如键盘照明、充电行为和显示屏。

处理器

AMD 的 Ryzen 7 7840HS配备 8 个 Zen 4 内核，由于采用了 SMT 技术，线程数增加到 16 个。这些内核的主频从 3.8 GHz（基本主频）高达 5.1 GHz（单核提升）。这使它成为 Pheonix 系列中第二快的 CPU，仅次于Ryzen 9 7940HS.

相比之下，其性能与酷睿 i7-13700H.惠普Victus 16和微星 Stealth 16 Studio则更快。英特尔的 HX 处理器，尤其是更昂贵的i9-13900HX显然处于领先地位。

在 Cinebench R15 连续测试中，我们注意到性能没有下降--即使在第一次运行后，性能也始终保持在较高水平。这样，CPU 的 TDP 始终保持在 80 瓦。

在 "发烧友 "模式下，开始运行时的功耗为 65 瓦，随后降至 55 瓦。在平衡模式下，CPU 仅在短时间内保持 50 至 55 瓦，随后降至 35 瓦。

在电池模式下，我们测得开始时有一小段时间为 30 瓦，随后为 25 瓦。其 Cinebench R15 分数从 2,681 降至 1,730 - 下降了 35%。

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS: Ø2303 (2287.15-2328.15)

HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	71.1 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	67 pt
Average of class Gaming	67 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	63.8 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	63.4 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	55.3 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	25932 (23977.8^min - 25931.6^max) Points +51%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	20034 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=227, last 2 years)	19753 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	18060 (17729.5^min - 18059.9^max) Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	17205 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (15515 - 17214, n=16)	16432 Points -4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	15410 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	14131 Points -18%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2105 Points +19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1854 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	1846 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=225, last 2 years)	1823 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1737 - 1812, n=16)	1771 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1767 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	1687 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1546 Points -13%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	9895 Points +49%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	7674 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=225, last 2 years)	7509 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7072 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6656 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6061 - 6744, n=16)	6418 Points -4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	5895 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5502 Points -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points +17%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	719 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	717 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=225, last 2 years)	702 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	686 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (661 - 705, n=16)	686 Points 0%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	649 Points -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	601 Points -12%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4100 (3846.15^min - 4100.04^max) Points +53%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=229, last 2 years)	3121 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2978 (2861.03^min - 2977.96^max) Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	2854 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	2681 (2635.57^min - 2681.14^max) Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (2473 - 2729, n=15)	2592 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	2328 Points -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	2317 (2203.13^min - 2316.56^max) Points -14%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	299 Points +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	294 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (270 - 286, n=15)	278 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	273 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	270 Points
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=228, last 2 years)	269 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	247 Points -9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	245 Points -9%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	219 Seconds * -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	215 Seconds * -16%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (185 - 229, n=17)	198.7 Seconds * -7%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=222, last 2 years)	198.3 Seconds * -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	186 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	174 Seconds * +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	169 Seconds * +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	123 Seconds * +34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	105001 MIPS +44%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=224, last 2 years)	77901 MIPS +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	76344 MIPS +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	75557 MIPS +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	73035 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (59538 - 73035, n=17)	69052 MIPS -5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	65405 MIPS -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	61191 MIPS -16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	7244 MIPS +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6866 MIPS +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	6632 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (6049 - 6754, n=17)	6559 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=224, last 2 years)	6157 MIPS -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	6125 MIPS -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	5584 MIPS -16%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	5559 MIPS -16%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19012 Points +61%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=229, last 2 years)	13737 Points +16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	13239 Points +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12378 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	11803 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (8446 - 12339, n=19)	11651 Points -1%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	11504 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	9683 Points -18%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2058 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	2040 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (1837 - 2017, n=19)	1968 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	1951 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	1829 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=229, last 2 years)	1818 Points -7%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	1685 Points -14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	1555 Points -20%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	26.2 fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	23.2 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	21.6 fps
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=227, last 2 years)	21.4 fps -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (11.7 - 21.8, n=17)	19.8 fps -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	19.7 fps -9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	17.5 fps -19%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	16.6 fps -23%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	68.1 s *
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	61.5 s * +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	54.6 s * +20%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	53.4 s * +22%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=221, last 2 years)	49.3 s * +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (38.3 - 68.3, n=17)	48.6 s * +29%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43.8 s * +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	37.9 s * +44%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H	0.504 sec * -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	0.4958 sec * -14%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=224, last 2 years)	0.468 sec * -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4498 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (0.4184 - 0.4739, n=17)	0.4393 sec * -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	0.4352 sec *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	0.421 sec * +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4028 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2681 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

161.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

270 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	92 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	87 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.9 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.5 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67.2 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29656 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27731 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (24712 - 28921, n=17)	26530 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	23600 KRay/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=220, last 2 years)	18886 KRay/s -32%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17934 KRay/s -35%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17161 KRay/s -38%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14470 KRay/s -48%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120974 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118600 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117390 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (103755 - 123167, n=17)	113554 Points -4%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105483 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=220, last 2 years)	94637 Points -20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81656 Points -31%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72193 Points -39%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	5888 MB/s +20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4974 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4920 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (4293 - 5096, n=17)	4773 MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=220, last 2 years)	4377 MB/s -11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4080 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3492 MB/s -29%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3326 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126954 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	126217 Points +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (105028 - 122681, n=17)	115459 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=220, last 2 years)	110118 Points +5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108729 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105597 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105028 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91638 Points -13%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15887 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15189 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (14385 - 15525, n=17)	15006 Points -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13440 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13097 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=220, last 2 years)	12259 Points -19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11050 Points -27%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8677 Points -43%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64255 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63114 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (55540 - 65812, n=17)	60530 Points -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58716 Points -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58232 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=220, last 2 years)	48276 Points -24%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44154 Points -30%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	36179 Points -43%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (67389 - 177158, n=17)	127587 MB/s +44%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111789 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=220, last 2 years)	107673 MB/s +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88619 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81504 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71191 MB/s -20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66484 MB/s -25%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55915 MB/s -37%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1689 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=220, last 2 years)	1224 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1147 MB/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1099 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (949 - 1123, n=17)	1062 MB/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1032 MB/s -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	950 MB/s -14%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	906 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15975 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	14776 KRay/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (13100 - 15599, n=17)	14237 KRay/s -4%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	12891 KRay/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=220, last 2 years)	10219 KRay/s -31%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9680 KRay/s -34%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9094 KRay/s -38%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7770 KRay/s -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50609 MPixel/s +27%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	46114 MPixel/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39928 MPixel/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39045 MPixel/s -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (17615 - 41157, n=17)	37292 MPixel/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=221, last 2 years)	37030 MPixel/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28499 MPixel/s -29%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	27554 MPixel/s -31%

系统性能

与联想Legion Pro 5 16和HP Omen Transcend 16在系统性能方面，酷睿 16 遥遥领先。主观上，一切运行也都很流畅。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8206 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	8183 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8167 - 8183, n=2)	8175 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	8153 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=195, last 2 years)	7601 Points -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7329 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7220 Points -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	7158 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	11302 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10934 - 11250, n=2)	11092 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11074 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10934 Points
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=194, last 2 years)	10735 Points -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10707 Points -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10579 Points -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10491 Points -4%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	10526 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10179 - 10526, n=2)	10353 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10235 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=194, last 2 years)	9737 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	9735 Points -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9376 Points -11%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9146 Points -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	8974 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	13370 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13229 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	12920 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12908 - 12920, n=2)	12914 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=194, last 2 years)	11502 Points -11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10860 Points -16%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10558 Points -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	10358 Points -20%

CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2027 Points +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1970 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)	1884 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1789 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1694 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1694 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1535 Points -9%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1930 Points +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1812 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)	1793 Points +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1705 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1629 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1629 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1508 Points -7%

CrossMark / Creativity
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	2316 Points +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2222 Points +19%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)	2051 Points +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1936 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1862 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1862 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1637 Points -12%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1785 Points +24%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)	1704 Points +19%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1635 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1557 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1435 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ()	1435 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1337 Points -7%

PCMark 10 Score		8183 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77103 MB/s +14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69289 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67907 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30937 - 72158, n=17)	65945 MB/s -3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60917 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=220, last 2 years)	59740 MB/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50007 MB/s -26%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47903 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84131 MB/s +39%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73950 MB/s +22%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70121 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=220, last 2 years)	63721 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	60730 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (30497 - 61911, n=17)	57613 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50703 MB/s -17%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	50111 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84517 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (34590 - 93323, n=17)	83733 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76244 MB/s -10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71464 MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=220, last 2 years)	61941 MB/s -27%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61520 MB/s -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54955 MB/s -35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	54587 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.1 ns * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	93.5 ns * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (85.1 - 112, n=17)	92.4 ns * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.9 ns *
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.8 ns * -0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	87.6 ns * -0%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=217, last 2 years)	86.9 ns * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.5 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

相比之下，根据 LatencyMon 的测试结果，酷睿 16 是为数不多的无需应对任何延迟的游戏笔记本电脑之一。至少，在我们的测试中，该工具没有发现任何异常高的延迟--非常好！我们的 4K/60 fps YouTube 视频播放流畅，没有掉帧。只有联想Legion Pro 5 16在这一领域表现类似。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	18226.8 μs * -2608%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1697 μs * -152%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1518 μs * -126%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1312.1 μs * -95%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	673.1 μs *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	603 μs * +10%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

申克在设备中安装了 1 TB 的三星 990 Pro。这款固态硬盘是目前速度最快的型号之一--在我们的固态硬盘最佳列表中排名第四。在酷睿16中，它虽然没有发挥出全部潜能，但速度仍然非常快。此外，它的性能在很长一段时间内都能保持稳定，与同样快速的固态硬盘形成鲜明对比。联想Legion Pro 5 16.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7129 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5731 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 435 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 386 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 145.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 422 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1171 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	88.7 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	88.2 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	83.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	72.4 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	70.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	69.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	64.9 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.2 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4677 (4664.17^min - 4676.56^max) MB/s +36%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3520 (3490.23^min - 3519.95^max) MB/s +2%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=194, last 2 years)	3502 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3449 (3368.24^min - 3448.79^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2809 - 4234, n=11)	3355 MB/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3349 (938.07^min - 3349.15^max) MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3023 (3010.73^min - 3023.25^max) MB/s -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2735 (2694.63^min - 2735.3^max) MB/s -21%
seq write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3637 - 5842, n=11)	4901 MB/s +35%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4485 (775.32^min - 4484.81^max) MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4326 (4313.21^min - 4326.48^max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=194, last 2 years)	3768 MB/s +4%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	3641 (3537^min - 3640.66^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3637 (3591.53^min - 3636.88^max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3152 (3026.22^min - 3152.01^max) MB/s -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2220 (2186.31^min - 2219.63^max) MB/s -39%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	7137 (6595.15^min - 7137.45^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (7011 - 7148, n=11)	7103 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6899 (5306.42^min - 6899.46^max) MB/s -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6661 (6037.07^min - 6660.97^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6660 (6017.57^min - 6659.93^max) MB/s -7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6460 (6020.84^min - 6459.94^max) MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=194, last 2 years)	6283 MB/s -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	6169 (5196.32^min - 6168.56^max) MB/s -14%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6818 (6604.35^min - 6817.63^max) MB/s
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (6531 - 6897, n=11)	6775 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5716 (5661.68^min - 5716.31^max) MB/s -16%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5355 (5315.44^min - 5354.87^max) MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4926^min - 4942.6^max) MB/s -28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4803 (4344.79^min - 4802.73^max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=194, last 2 years)	4733 MB/s -31%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2216 (2187.96^min - 2215.64^max) MB/s -67%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	80.1 (78.57^min - 80.12^max) MB/s +25%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (55.3 - 84.5, n=11)	74.7 MB/s +16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.9 (64.79^min - 67.93^max) MB/s +6%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=194, last 2 years)	67.4 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	64.2 (63.05^min - 64.22^max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	56.6 (54^min - 56.56^max) MB/s -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	56.3 (55.9^min - 56.3^max) MB/s -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	48.4 (47.92^min - 48.42^max) MB/s -25%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	253 (250.9^min - 252.85^max) MB/s +73%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (146.3 - 343, n=11)	250 MB/s +71%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	244 (243^min - 243.65^max) MB/s +67%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=194, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +53%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	159.6 (158.36^min - 159.58^max) MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	146.3 (140.58^min - 146.31^max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	142.3 (140.08^min - 142.3^max) MB/s -3%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	127 (124.67^min - 127.01^max) MB/s -13%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4173 (4166.98^min - 4173.4^max) MB/s +287%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (818 - 4923, n=11)	3366 MB/s +213%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3311 (3243.78^min - 3311.19^max) MB/s +207%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3013 (755.04^min - 3013.06^max) MB/s +180%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=194, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s +140%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1077 (1013.53^min - 1077.14^max) MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1004 (933.19^min - 1004.48^max) MB/s -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	932 (919.54^min - 932.39^max) MB/s -13%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3552 (3546.24^min - 3551.63^max) MB/s +760%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 (1172^min - 2736.15^max) MB/s +562%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (413 - 4683, n=11)	2709 MB/s +556%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2193 (2174.06^min - 2193.44^max) MB/s +431%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=194, last 2 years)	2153 MB/s +421%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	501 (456.23^min - 501.33^max) MB/s +21%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	488 (476.91^min - 488.32^max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	413 (372.31^min - 412.68^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8963 Points +45%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (5405 - 10265, n=11)	8463 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8452 Points +36%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7774 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=182, last 2 years)	6818 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	6291 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	6198 Points
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	4988 Points -20%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3449 Points +115%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3174 Points +98%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1349 - 4721, n=11)	3049 Points +90%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2959 Points +85%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=182, last 2 years)	2494 Points +56%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1603 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	1523 Points -5%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	1480 Points -8%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	4064 Points +7%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (2308 - 4684, n=11)	4009 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3832 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3812 Points
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3723 Points -2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3331 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=182, last 2 years)	3117 Points -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2858 Points -25%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5621.18 MB/s +29%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	5588.41 MB/s +28%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	5265.97 MB/s +21%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5185.49 MB/s +19%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (4362 - 5760, n=11)	5138 MB/s +18%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5126 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=182, last 2 years)	4916 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	4362 MB/s
Seq Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (3376 - 5609, n=11)	4780 MB/s +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4546 MB/s +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010.3 MB/s +19%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3900.46 MB/s +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3875.81 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=182, last 2 years)	3614 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3376 MB/s
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2831.66 MB/s -16%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.46 MB/s +20%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (61.2 - 76.8, n=11)	70.4 MB/s +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.7 MB/s +11%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=182, last 2 years)	66.5 MB/s +9%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	62.76 MB/s +3%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	61.43 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	61.2 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	54.59 MB/s -11%
4K Write
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (181.9 - 306, n=11)	226 MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	211.54 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=182, last 2 years)	210 MB/s +15%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	209.28 MB/s +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	207 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	181.9 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	177.87 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	137.9 MB/s -24%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2813.87 MB/s +155%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2593.07 MB/s +135%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (787 - 3164, n=11)	2383 MB/s +116%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2378 MB/s +115%
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=182, last 2 years)	1930 MB/s +75%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	1105 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	909.92 MB/s -18%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	892.37 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	3498.72 MB/s +6%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (1592 - 3975, n=11)	3317 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	3293 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3219.74 MB/s -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3195.33 MB/s -3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2669 MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=182, last 2 years)	2549 MB/s -23%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	2365.53 MB/s -28%
Access Time Read
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.079 ms * -259%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=181, last 2 years)	0.05376 ms * -144%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.052 ms * -136%
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.018 - 0.074, n=11)	0.03891 ms * -77%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.031 ms * -41%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.027 ms * -23%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.023 ms * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.064 ms * -191%
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	0.054 ms * -145%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=182, last 2 years)	0.0472 ms * -115%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.029 ms * -32%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	0.022 ms *
Average Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB (0.012 - 0.053, n=11)	0.02091 ms * +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms * +9%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02	0.02 ms * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)

图形卡

英伟达™ (NVIDIA®)英伟达GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑 GPU可充分利用 140 瓦（115 瓦 + 25 瓦动态提升）的功率。另外，你也可以用更低的价格购买到笔记本电脑的RTX 4060.在 3DMarks 合成测试中，酷睿 16 遥遥领先于其他竞争对手--其性能比我们数据库中典型的 RTX 4070 平均值高出约 13%。

在电池模式下，当我们再次运行时，原来的 32,810 分只剩下 16,407 分。 Fire Strike再次运行时的 32,810 分仅剩下 16,407 分，下降了 50%。

酷睿 16 在游戏中的速度也很快，但这次它并没有拔得头筹。这可能是由于《DOTA 2》等重 CPU 的游戏所致。在这些游戏中，许多竞争对手都取得了更好的 CPU 性能。

在平衡模式下，它在运行《Witcher 3 》时的表现很奇怪：游戏运行速度约为 117 帧/秒，几乎与超速模式下的速度相当。这也意味着风扇运行时的噪音并没有降低。大约一分钟后，帧速率突然降到了 30，而风扇发出的噪音只有 28 分贝。看来这个模式并没有完全优化。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	99.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	93.7 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	91.7 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	91.4 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	90.4 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.3 pt
Average of class Gaming	87.5 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86.7 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	45606 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	41302 Points -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	41090 Points -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	40995 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=225, last 2 years)	40701 Points -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 46434, n=50)	40358 Points -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	39951 Points -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	38784 Points -15%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	175566 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	169253 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	163483 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	157673 Points -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (54238 - 193851, n=20)	149792 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=137, last 2 years)	136316 Points -19%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	32810 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	30936 Points -6%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30239 Points -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	30051 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	29853 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=230, last 2 years)	29606 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (16212 - 33451, n=50)	29284 Points -11%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	27343 Points -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	13040 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	12617 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=227, last 2 years)	12103 Points -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	11960 Points -8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11955 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	11868 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6241 - 13391, n=49)	11762 Points -10%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	11168 Points -14%

3DMark 11 Performance		36692 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		65883 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		28810 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		12909 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24 Seconds * -20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23 Seconds * -15%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=180, last 2 years)	23 Seconds * -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 28, n=49)	21.4 Seconds * -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	21 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	20 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	19 Seconds * +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +5%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=187, last 2 years)	39 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 142, n=52)	38.9 Seconds * -22%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds * -13%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	36 Seconds * -13%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	36 Seconds * -13%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	35 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	33 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	32 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	379 Seconds * -27%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	364 Seconds * -22%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=200, last 2 years)	314 Seconds * -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	299 Seconds * -0%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS	298 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (158 - 428, n=49)	286 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX	277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	94.7 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	91.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	87.8 pt
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.5 pt
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	78.3 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.8 (114^min) fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=222, last 2 years)	117.6 fps -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111.8 (102^min) fps -7%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.9 (3.81^min, 76.9^P1) fps +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.7 (4.54^min, 76.9^P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116.1 (4.31^min, 83.3^P1) fps
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	112.8 (4.13^min, 66.7^P1) fps -3%
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=212, last 2 years)	107.8 fps -7%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.4 (36.1^min, 71.4^P1) fps -16%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	124.8 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.9 fps -4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=223, last 2 years)	111.5 fps -11%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.3 fps -12%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	109.1 fps -13%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	223 (89^min, 167.8^P1) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	218 (57.2^min, 162.5^P1) fps
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	208 (60.7^min, 153.8^P1) fps -5%
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=220, last 2 years)	208 fps -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	200 (31.2^min, 147.4^P1) fps -8%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	192.6 (25.1^min, 144.3^P1) fps -12%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	192 (24.8^min, 138.8^P1) fps -12%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	182 (152.8^min) fps +35%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	168.4 (146.6^min) fps +25%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	154.7 (131.1^min) fps +15%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=232, last 2 years)	143.7 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134.8 (119.8^min) fps
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	131.6 (112.7^min) fps -2%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114.8 (97.8^min) fps -15%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	132.9 fps +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.8 fps +38%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110.2 fps +29%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=237, last 2 years)	102.5 fps +20%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95.4 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85.5 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	76.3 fps -11%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	597 (520^min) fps +64%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	500.9 (442^min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (314 - 617, n=22)	467 fps +28%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	452.3 fps +24%
Average of class Gaming (54.1 - 718, n=124, last 2 years)	427 fps +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	364.2 fps
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	322.5 (274^min) fps -11%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	415.1 (392^min) fps +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	390.5 fps +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	375.9 (351^min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (123.3 - 449, n=24)	348 fps +19%
Average of class Gaming (34.2 - 617, n=136, last 2 years)	329 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	291.5 fps
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	257.3 (239^min) fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	245.2 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	226.7 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (123.9 - 268, n=36)	226 fps -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	222.7 (209^min) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=162, last 2 years)	221 fps -10%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	213.3 (182^min) fps -13%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	120 fps
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119.8 (114^min) fps 0%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=222, last 2 years)	117.6 fps -2%
HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	114 fps -5%
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.2 (98^min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=52)	111.9 fps -7%
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	111.8 (102^min) fps -7%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)

HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	185.4		174.1	116.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	364.2	291.5	245.2	120	92
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	161.2	153.5	142.2	134.8		136.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	215	171.4	124.8		91
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	123.7	108.3	85.5			85.7
Strange Brigade (2018)	367	302	249	218
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)				77.2	55.3

排放与动力 - 酷睿 16 动力强劲

噪音排放

在空闲模式下，风扇通常根本不转，尤其是在平衡模式下。即使在超频模式下，情况也是如此，但风扇有时也会快速转动。

在负载情况下，酷睿 16 的噪音水平会稳步上升，而不是大幅跃升。这意味着在平均负载下，例如在第一个 3DMark06 基准测试场景中，其噪音水平仍然相对较低。

在连续的游戏过程中，它的噪音会变大一些，但竞争对手的噪音水平也差不多--Acer Nitro 16 的噪音实际上大得让人难以忍受。微星 Stealth 16 Studio，尤其是性能较弱的HP Victus 16 仍然比较安静。

Noise Level

Idle		23 / 28.48 / 28.48 dB(A)
Load		30 / 54.12 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	HP Omen Transcend 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	HP Victus 16-r0077ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
Noise		5%	-6%	-12%	5%	-8%
off / environment *	23	23.2 -1%	25.7 -12%	22.9 -0%	24 -4%	25 -9%
Idle Minimum *	23	23.2 -1%	25.7 -12%	29.1 -27%	24 -4%	28 -22%
Idle Average *	28.48	23.2 19%	25.7 10%	29.1 -2%	24 16%	29 -2%
Idle Maximum *	28.48	26.2 8%	26.3 8%	29.1 -2%	24 16%	30 -5%
Load Average *	30	31.4 -5%	33.9 -13%	45.7 -52%	34.81 -16%	43 -43%
Witcher 3 ultra *	54.12	48.4 11%		54.3 -0%	44.05 19%	46 15%
Load Maximum *	54.12	53.8 1%	62 -15%	54.3 -0%	51.57 5%	48 11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

申克公司强调，它使用的是液态金属导热膏。酷睿 16 从未出现过发热现象--在持续负载的情况下，我们在背面中央测得的热点温度为 46 °C。左侧和 WASD 键的温度似乎略高于右侧。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


43 °C	46 °C	43 °C
40 °C	43 °C	35 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 36.8 °C


39 °C	44 °C	44 °C
28 °C	33 °C	30 °C
25 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 32.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 59 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


31 °C	32 °C	32 °C
30 °C	31 °C	30 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 32 °C
Average: 29.7 °C


31 °C	33 °C	32 °C
31 °C	30 °C	30 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 29.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 33 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


42 °C	44 °C	38 °C
39 °C	42 °C	29 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 35 °C


40 °C	42 °C	42 °C
26 °C	30 °C	30 °C
25 °C	25 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 31.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 54 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).

	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	HP Victus 16-r0077ng Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		8%	-3%	-1%	-26%	-10%
Maximum Upper Side *	46	41.8 9%	41.5 10%	47.4 -3%	60 -30%	51 -11%
Maximum Bottom *	44	41.4 6%	51.8 -18%	54.4 -24%	61 -39%	54 -23%
Idle Upper Side *	32	29 9%	31.6 1%	28.4 11%	38.2 -19%	37 -16%
Idle Bottom *	33	30.4 8%	34.5 -5%	29.2 12%	37.7 -14%	29 12%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

立体声扬声器音量不大，低音不多，中低音也不平衡。只有高音均衡且线性。要获得更好的音频体验，应使用耳机或外部系统。耳机插孔和麦克风插孔输入可用于连接前者。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

在空闲模式下，它的功耗适中--我们已经习惯了上一代 XMG 机型较高的功耗值。在游戏模式下，它的耗电量与性能息息相关，这就是为什么这款笔记本电脑的耗电量介于两款笔记本电脑之间的原因。联想Legion Pro 5和HP Omen Transcend 16 之间。和MSI Stealth 16 Studio 之间。和HP Victus 16之间。

我们测得的短期最大功耗为 280 瓦--230 瓦的电源（现在是 FSP，而不是 LiteOn）可能会在这方面有些吃力。不过，在全高清超高清模式下运行 Witcher 3 时，酷睿的平均功耗为 179 瓦，这意味着电源应该有足够的储备用于游戏，而且可以始终可靠地为笔记本电脑充电。不过，我们测得的功耗在压力测试的前几分钟一直高于 230 瓦--请看下面的曲线。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.7 Watt
Idle	11 / 15.2 / 16 Watt
Load	64 / 280 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-26%	-19%	-82%	-6%	1%	-21%	-37%
Idle Minimum *	11	8.1 26%	11.6 -5%	19.2 -75%	11 -0%	8 27%	12.1 ?(4.3 - 26.7, n=41) -10%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=177, last 2 years) -25%
Idle Average *	15.2	15.9 -5%	15.6 -3%	22.7 -49%	18 -18%	13 14%	16.9 ?(4.6 - 34.1, n=41) -11%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=177, last 2 years) -26%
Idle Maximum *	16	37.2 -133%	16.5 -3%	55.4 -246%	19 -19%	22 -38%	24.1 ?(9 - 55.4, n=41) -51%	26.9 ?(9 - 101.1, n=177, last 2 years) -68%
Load Average *	64	90.9 -42%	155 -142%	128.4 -101%	91 -42%	86 -34%	99.5 ?(59.2 - 178, n=41) -55%	111.2 ?(32.1 - 202, n=177, last 2 years) -74%
Witcher 3 ultra *	179	189.6 -6%	154.8 14%	206 -15%	130 27%	141.8 21%
Load Maximum *	280	263.5 6%	205 27%	292 -4%	228 19%	233 17%	220 ?(107 - 319, n=41) 21%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=176, last 2 years) 10%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø179 (165.22-211.94)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø189.6 (178.6-202)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø154.8 (151.7-164.2)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø209 (119.15-279.86)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø190.7 (148.9-264)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø181.6 (150.2-215)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.3 (10.513-15.76)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø13.6 (8.19-21.9)

Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.2 (6.7-17.5)

Power consumption with external monitor

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø119.6 (116.33-121.43)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø147.3 (143.4-160)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø107.7 (82.83-112.88)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø146.3 (139.7-154.4)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø112.9 (64.19-116.81)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø174.3 (168.88-181.28)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø211 (203-215)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø181.8 (170.33-191.61)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø190.6 (186.4-199)

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16.3 (13.916-21.789)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø12.5 (7.11-23.4)

运行时间

申克在笔记本电脑中安装了一块 99 Wh 的电池。联想联想Legion Pro 5 16仅配备了 80 Wh 电池，但一些竞争对手，如MSI Stealth 16或HP Omen Transcend 16的电池容量相当。

即便如此，我们还是缺少控制中心的省电模式--平衡模式是最低可用模式。我们的 H.264 编码电影在亮度降低的情况下连续循环播放了 8 个多小时。在 150 尼特的 WLAN 测试中，Core 也达到了近 8.5 小时。只有Acer Nitro 16 能达到这一水平。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		8h 21min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		10h 9min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 23min

	SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	HP Victus 16-r0077ng i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-55%	-6%	-50%	-11%	-15%	-34%
H.264	609		614 1%		462 -24%		399 ?(56 - 747, n=91, last 2 years) -34%
WiFi v1.3	501	240 -52%	540 8%	250 -50%	466 -7%	426 -15%	369 ?(57 - 745, n=179, last 2 years) -26%
Load	143	61 -57%	105 -27%	73 -49%	142 -1%		84.5 ?(40 - 173, n=141, last 2 years) -41%
Reader / Idle		392	729	375	661		543 ?(57 - 1290, n=83, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 可选择机械键盘或薄膜按键

+ 1,600p sRGB 显示屏，具有极低的 DeltaE 值

+ 强大的 RTX 4070（比平均值高 13）

+ 速度极快的固态硬盘（三星 990 Pro）

+ 保持相对低温

+ 良好的运行时间

Cons

- 平衡模式行为（游戏时）

- 触摸板点击时会有点卡

- 电源在最大负载下接近极限

结论 - 出色的游戏笔记本电脑，没有任何重大缺陷

配备 RTX 4070 的 16 英寸笔记本电脑起价约为 1,600 美元。但这并不意味着酷睿 16 完全物美价廉（见下文）。反过来，它确实提供了良好的 3D 性能、市场上最快的固态硬盘之一、可选的机械键盘、良好的 1,600p sRGB 面板和较低的 DeltaE 值等等。这是一款全面的游戏笔记本电脑，其性能恰到好处。要想获得更好的性能水平，就必须使用 HX 处理器，因为 RTX 4070 的性能非常出色。

你必须仔细观察这款设备，才能找到任何值得批评的地方。在极端情况下，230 瓦的电源可能会超负荷--至少在我们的压力测试中，电源超负荷运行了几分钟。在游戏中，这被证明是没有问题的。它的平衡模式还不够完善，只有在游戏一分钟后才真正起作用，性能下降到电池水平。

在我们的所有测试中，XMG 酷睿 16 凭借其强大的 RTX 4070 和校准良好的 sRGB 显示屏，被证明是一款优秀的游戏笔记本电脑。

酷睿 16 的最大竞争对手是联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8它在很多方面表现类似，但价格更低。另一方面，它的运行时间也不尽如人意。

价格和供应情况

您可以通过bestware.com 购买申克的笔记本电脑。.我们的配置价格约为 2360 美元。

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) - 2023-10-05 10/05/2023 v7
Christian Hintze

Chassis

83 / 98 → 84%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

65 / 80 → 81%

Weight

61 / 10-66 → 90%

Battery

83 / 95 → 87%

Display

89%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

96%

Temperature

89 / 95 → 94%

Noise

81 / 90 → 90%

Audio

72%

Average

82%

89%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 222 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 392227 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 申克 XMG 酷睿 16 游戏笔记本评测--联想Legion Pro 5 16 的真正竞争对手

Christian Hintze, 2023-10-11 (Update: 2023-10-11)

申克 XMG 酷睿 16 游戏笔记本评测--联想Legion Pro 5 16 的真正竞争对手

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳与连接 - 时尚的 Core 16

尺寸比较

输入设备 - 机械或薄膜按键

显示屏 - 著名的 16:10 1,600p IPS 面板

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 强劲的 RTX 4070 和 Ryzen 7

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放与动力 - 酷睿 16 动力强劲

噪音排放

温度

发言人

SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 出色的游戏笔记本电脑，没有任何重大缺陷

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare