判决
与 Yoga 系列类似，IdeaPad 通常是价格、性能和移动性的完美结合。后缀为 14IPH11 的 2026 版 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 也在许多方面给人留下了深刻印象。首先是成功的机身，时尚的设计和可翻转的屏幕赋予了这款 14 英寸设备适合各种场合（平板模式、站立模式......）的多功能特性。
无论是 Wi-Fi 7 芯片还是 Panther Lake 处理器，这款敞篷跑车的引擎盖看起来也很现代。不过，在测试中，酷睿至尊 5 322 只能在有限的程度上说服我们。虽然 CPU 性能与老款芯片相当，但 iGPU 的速度却相当令人失望，我们将在文章中加以说明。与此同时，适中的功耗和由此带来的宽裕电池续航时间也是加分项。
Pros
Cons
- $549.00Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14" WUXGA Touchscreen Intel Core Ultra 5 AI 8GB Ram 512 SSD Luna Grey Windows 11 83KR0047US
- $459.97Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14" FHD(1920 x 1200) IPS Touchscreen 2-in-1 Laptop, Intel Core i5-1235U, Backlit KB, Wi-Fi 6, Fingerprint, Thunderbolt™ 4, w/Stylus (8GB RAM | 512GB SSD)
- $430.00Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i Chromebook Plus 14" FHD+ 2-in-1 Touchscreen Laptop (Intel Core i3-1315U, 8GB RAM, 128GB eMMC + 128GB SD Card), Home, Students, Business, Backlit, Lightweight, Webcam, Chrome OS
作为本次测试的对比设备，我们使用了其他 14 英寸可转换设备，如价格稍高的 Yoga 7a 二合一配备 Ryzen AI 5 435和较早的英特尔代表机型 宏碁 Aspire Spin 14(Core Ultra 5 115U), 惠普 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14(酷睿 7 258V)和 戴尔 Inspiron 14 二合一(酷睿 i7-1255U)，以便分别对处理器和图形处理器进行更好的分类。
规格
箱子和设备
正如开头提到的，由于具有折叠功能、铰链坚固且做工精良，这款保护套绝对是一款全能产品。尽管尺寸小巧，但在稳定性方面几乎没有什么可抱怨的，1.6 千克左右的重量对于 14 英寸设备来说也是合理的。
我们认为连接的数量还不错。虽然没有 RJ45 端口，但有一个 HDMI 输出、一个音频插孔和一个中速 microSD 读卡器。四个 USB 端口（2x Type-C，包括 DisplayPort 和 PowerDelivery + 2x Type-A）也很有用，尽管联想只选择了 3.0 标准。
无线模块（Wi-Fi 7 与否）的性能也与预期和可能性有些差距。全高清网络摄像头提供了典型的笔记本电脑质量，甚至可以更清晰、色彩更准确。制造商还可以在机箱开启装置上下功夫，因为底板在某些地方固定得非常牢固。另一方面，IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 具有两个经典的 SO-DIMM 内存插槽和两个 M.2 插槽，这一点非常好，如今这已不再是理所当然的事情，尤其是在 14 英寸系列中。顺便提一下，供货范围不包括电源装置；可兼容 45 至 65 瓦的标准 Type-C 型号。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (28.1 - 197, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (28.9 - 254, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE213 160MHz (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE213 160MHz (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive RT-BE96U WiFi7 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
网络摄像头
维护
输入设备
输入设备--正如你对联想的期望--相对较好。键盘采用白色照明，布局合理，不过中间的方向箭头有点弱。打字手感不错，约 12 x 7.5 厘米的触摸板也是如此，不过其点击区域听起来有些摇晃。
显示屏
60 Hz 触摸屏的格式为 16:10，分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，由于表面光滑，反光性很强，因此户外使用很成问题，不过略低于 400 cd/m² 的亮度基本可以接受。与大多数 IPS 面板一样，对比度也未达到 1,000:1 大关，而色彩空间则无法与 Yoga 7a 2-in-1 和 OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 相提并论，后者的色彩空间约为 60% sRGB。在交货状态下，你也不应对色彩准确性抱有过高期望。响应时间和可视角度符合典型的 IPS 水平。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 411 cd/m²
Contrast: 1284:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.88 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
60.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
42% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.202
CCT: 6359 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 NV140WUM-N41 (BOE0C63), IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Samsung SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 BOE NV14N42, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 109% | -6% | 108% | -8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 42 | 99.9 138% | 39.1 -7% | 99.8 138% | 38.6 -8% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 60.9 | 100 64% | 57.9 -5% | 100 64% | 56.2 -8% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 43.4 | 97.5 125% | 40.5 -7% | 96.7 123% | 39.9 -8% |
| Response Times | 93% | -10% | 96% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 26.8 ? | 1.5 ? 94% | 28.8 ? -7% | 0.86 ? 97% | 27.2 ? -1% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 17.5 ? | 1.4 ? 92% | 19.7 ? -13% | 1.01 ? 94% | 20.8 ? -19% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 ? | 469 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 20 | 33.3 | |||
| Screen | 33% | 4% | 41% | -17% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 411 | 376 -9% | 357 -13% | 363.9 -11% | 269.4 -34% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 397 | 373 -6% | 344 -13% | 366 -8% | 260 -35% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 91 | 96 5% | 87 -4% | 99 9% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.32 | 0.26 19% | 0.41 -28% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 1284 | 1373 7% | 657 -49% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.88 | 2.19 68% | 6 13% | 0.84 88% | 6.53 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.85 | 6.96 65% | 22.87 -15% | 2.72 86% | 19.76 -0% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 1.6 72% | 3.5 40% | 1.1 81% | 5.4 7% |
| Gamma | 2.202 100% | 2.224 99% | 1.992 110% | 2.18 101% | 2.05 107% |
| CCT | 6359 102% | 6453 101% | 6585 99% | 6330 103% | 6007 108% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.76 | 4.46 | 0.82 | 3.13 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 78% /
64% | -4% /
-0% | 82% /
69% | -12% /
-14% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 17.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7819 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试配置包括 16GB DDR5 内存（2x 8）和 512GB NVMe 固态硬盘，既不简陋，也不特别丰富。从各方面考虑，这款处理器都处于低端和中端之间。
测试条件
Fn+Q 组合键可用于在三种性能配置文件之间切换。我们的测试在 "性能 "模式下进行，该模式通常基于 "自适应 "模式（见表）。
| 模式 | 电池 | 自适应 | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 33 dB(A) | 35 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率（FHD/超高清） | 8.5 帧/秒 | 8.8 帧/秒 | 8.9 帧/秒 |
| CPU PL1 | 16 W | 19 W | 24 W |
| CPU PL2 | 40 W | 45 W | 45 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 990 分 | 1156 分 | 1168 分 |
处理器
核心 Core Ultra 5 322采用现代 1.8 纳米工艺制造，共提供六个内核，不带超线程功能。然而，其性能往往无法与老式芯片相比。例如，在我们的基准测试中，它只能达到酷睿 i7-1255U 的水平。至少，Panther Lake 芯片比 Core Ultra 5 115U 稍微快一些。不过，酷睿至尊 7 258V 和 Ryzen AI 5 435 要快 20%左右。值得称赞的是，Ultra 5 322 还不得不使用比上述机型更少的内核。纯单核性能甚至令人印象深刻。
Cinebench R15 多回路
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 -1! | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 -1! | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 -1! | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1480 - 64158, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (11392 - 184800, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Convertible (797 - 8291, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Convertible (14686 - 148874, n=42, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (4929 - 97193, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (5271 - 190280, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Convertible (218 - 2017, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (14193 - 85327, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 (v6.50.5800) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1413 - 4402, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14 在对比设备中处于中游位置。在日常使用中，系统响应速度非常快。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 -1! | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 -4! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 10123, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12222, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (5062 - 17914, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=46, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (554 - 1942, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Convertible (381 - 1719, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (386 - 1089, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6331 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (23880 - 161475, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (19931 - 131960, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Convertible (17473 - 216896, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 5 322 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (6.9 - 536, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
闪迪的 512 GB 硬盘（型号 SN5100S）基于 2242 格式，是中速 NVMe 的代表之一。如果需要，还可以添加另一块固态硬盘；这块固态硬盘的格式高达 2280。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
Ultra 5 322 安装的 iGPU 是 图形 2 Xe3它具有 16 条管线和两个光线追踪核心，因此是这款 14 英寸机型的最大弱点。在 3DMark 测试中，IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 在测试领域排名靠后，落后于旧版的 Iris Xe Graphics G796EUs，也落后于 图形 4 核iGPU。与 Radeon 840M相比，Yoga 的图形芯片也不占优势。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 27030 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 19754 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4114 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 145115 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 18029 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2936 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
因此，联想电脑在游戏方面遇到困难也就不足为奇了。除了老游戏或要求不高的游戏，如 Dota 2大多数游戏即使在最低设置下也会卡顿，这就是为什么即使是休闲游戏玩家也一定要寻找其他具有更强大 iGPU 的笔记本电脑的原因。
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 | |
| Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 79.5, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 91.7 | 72.6 | 52.2 | 34.6 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 22.9 | 22.9 | 22.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 18.8 | 14 | 12.2 | 8.9 |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 16.1 | 11.4 | 9.2 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 6.5 | 6.2 | 6 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 29 | 23 | 18 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 8.5 | 7 | 5.1 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 29.2 | 18.3 | 9.1 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 25 | 22 | 15 | |
| Pragmata (2026) | 14.4 | 10.4 | 8.4 | |
| 007 First Light (2026) | 7.3 | 6.5 | 5.9 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
虽然 IdeaPad 5 在自适应模式下仍然相当安静，但在性能模式下，风扇的 42 至 44 分贝（A）噪音绝对会引起人们的注意，而竞争对手有时也能达到类似的数值。在空闲模式下，这款 14 英寸的机型安静宜人。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 44 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -7% | 12% | 7% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 25 -4% | 22.9 5% | 23.1 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 25 -4% | 23.2 3% | 24.7 -3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 29 -16% | 28 -12% | 23.2 7% | 24.7 1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 33 -27% | 29 -12% | 23.2 11% | 24.7 5% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43 | 41 5% | 37 14% | 27.8 35% | 27.7 36% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 42 | 40 5% | 47 -12% | 33.6 20% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 44 | 42 5% | 51 -16% | 43.4 1% | 45.1 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 45.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与其他同类产品一样，机身底部的发热量高于顶部，不过手掌部位始终凉爽宜人。在压力测试中，处理器的温度略低于 80 °C，完全可以接受。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -17% | 13% | 27% | 18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 47 | 59 -26% | 41 13% | 35.8 24% | 38.2 19% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 54 | 58 -7% | 47 13% | 37.6 30% | 45.6 16% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27 | 27 | 25.2 | 27.4 | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28 | 31 | 26.6 | 28.4 |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器可提供相当不错的音效，并能达到可用的最大音量。
Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
14 英寸设备的闲置功耗为 4 至 7 瓦，是同类产品中最经济的。我们测得的最大负载功率为 71 瓦。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 4 / 4.8 / 7.4 Watt |
| Load |
36 / 71 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -12% | -9% | -9% | -29% | -18% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4 | 4.3 -8% | 5 -25% | 3 25% | 5.2 -30% | 4.29 ? -7% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.8 | 4.7 2% | 6 -25% | 4.4 8% | 8.2 -71% | 7.1 ? -48% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.4 | 5.7 23% | 9 -22% | 9.4 -27% | 9.9 -34% | 8.68 ? -17% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 36 | 50 -39% | 32 11% | 42.3 -17% | 44.4 -23% | 44.1 ? -23% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 34 | 51.1 -50% | 34.4 -1% | 51.1 -50% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 71 | 72 -1% | 67 6% | 65 8% | 62.5 12% | 67.2 ? 5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 45.5 | 32 | 49.9 | |||
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 35 |
* ... smaller is better
电池寿命
超长的运行时间是绝对的亮点。在 WLAN 测试中，在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，运行时间超过 15 小时，这值得尊敬，也击败了所有竞争对手。
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Ultra 5 322, Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 PTL, 60 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 5 435, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Ultra 5 115U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 50 Wh | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 54 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -5% | -18% | -8% | -50% | -22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 15.3 | 14.6 -5% | 12.5 -18% | 14 -8% | 7.6 -50% | 11.9 ? -22% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 15.9 | 27 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 2.1 | 1.805 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
联想 IdeaPad 5 2 合 1 14IPH11 是一款成功的可折叠产品，但其酷睿 Ultra 5 322 的 GPU 性能很低。
Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11
- 05/29/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.1%  | Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 5 322 ⎘ Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $549.00 Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14"... 2. $459.97 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i 14" F... 3. $430.00 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i Chrom... List Price: 800 EUR | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
2. 81.5%  | Lenovo Yoga 7a 2-in-1 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $17.90 KEANBOLL 2-Pack Tempered Gla... 2. $53.99 WODBAO Laptop Case for Lenov... 3. $49.99 Laptop Case Cover for Lenovo... List Price: 1100 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15.4 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
3. 78.3%  | Acer Aspire Spin 14 ASP14-52MTN-51V5 Intel Core Ultra 5 115U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $29.99 65W Charger for Acer Aspire ... 2. $481.77 Acer Aspire 14 AI Copilot+ P... 3. $23.99 45W Laptop Charger Power Ada... List Price: 800 EUR | 1.6 kg | 21.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
4. 88.7%  | HP OmniBook Ultra Flip 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250 USD | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
5. 83.7% v7 (old)  | Dell Inspiron 14 7420 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1255U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $95.98 Replacement for Dell Inspiro... 2. $128.00 GBOLE Screen Replacement for... 3. $849.99 Dell Inspiron 14 7440 2-in-1... List Price: 1050 USD | 1.6 kg | 17.86 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
