Alienware x17 R2笔记本电脑回顾。峰值175WGeForce RTX 3080 Ti性能

戴尔去年年底推出了Alienware x17系列,采用了全新的机箱设计,以区别于现有的Alienware m17系列。今年,制造商刷新了产品线,推出了Alienware x17 R2,配备了12代英特尔Alder Lake-P CPU和GeForce RTX 3070/3080 Ti显卡,分别取代去年的11代Tiger Lake-H和RTX 3070/3080选项。其他更新也是如此,包括更快的内存(DDR4-3466到DDR5-4800),更新的显示选项,以及对MUX和高级优化的支持。
除了上面提到的内部更新外,Alienware x17 R2使用的机箱与Alienware x17 R1相同。我们建议检查出 我们对x17 R1的评论因为我们对机箱、Cherry机械键盘和端口的现有评论也适用于x17 R2。
关于所有可配置的选项,请看下面的官方技术规格。我们的具体测试单元是一个更高端的SKU,配备酷睿i9-12900HK,360赫兹1080p显示屏,以及175 WGeForce RTX 3080 Ti显卡,价格略低于4000美元。这一领域的竞争者包括其他超薄的17.3英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 微星GS77, Razer Blade 17,以及 华硕Zephyrus S17.
更多Alienware评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.2 % | 05/2022 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 20.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89 % | 09/2021 | Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 3.2 kg | 21.4 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
90.1 % | 08/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.2 % | 04/2022 | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 20.8 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.4 % | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS i9-10900K, GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile | 4.2 kg | 42 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | ||
83.2 % | 10/2021 | Gigabyte A7 X1 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 34 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
案例
虽然它被宣传为超薄游戏笔记本电脑,但与华硕Zephyrus S17、微星GS77或雷蛇Blade 17等替代品相比,Alienware x17 R2机箱仍然明显更重更大。作为回报,Alienware系统能够携带更强大的175瓦GPU,而其他大多数超薄游戏笔记本的功率都限制在140瓦或以下。
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (AV Pro V60) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12 | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD |
网络摄像头
与最新的Razer Blade 17的1080p相比,网络摄像头仍然是720p,没有物理隐私快门。支持Windows Hello。

显示
我们的AU Optronics B173HAN IPS面板几乎满足了所有的典型要求,包括快速的360赫兹刷新率,快速的黑白和灰度响应时间,以及完整的sRGB覆盖,适合游戏和大多数图形编辑。其他拥有17.3英寸1080p 360 Hz显示屏选项的笔记本电脑制造商可能会使用与我们的Alienware相同的AU Optronics面板。更高端的4K 120赫兹选项也是可用的,都支持G-Sync。
目前还没有OLED选项,而OLED可以提供比通常的IPS解决方案更广泛的DCI-P3色彩覆盖和更深的黑色水平。
有趣的是,我们的FHD面板没有原来x17 R1上的4K UHD面板那么亮。我们能够测量到这里的最大亮度为365尼特,而4K x17 R1的亮度为439尼特。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 365.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 1260:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.17 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 0.51
ΔE Greyscale 5.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
79.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
79.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E AU Optronics B173ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Gigabyte A7 X1 AU Optronics AUO8E8D, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 12% | 8% | 10% | 8% | -17% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 79.2 | 88.3 11% | 94.2 19% | 96.2 21% | 82.5 4% | 61.5 -22% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 98.7 -1% | 99.7 0% | 98 -2% | 90.9 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 79.6 | 100 26% | 84.4 6% | 85.8 8% | 96.6 21% | 63.2 -21% |
Response Times | -15% | 37% | -41% | -57% | -23% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.4 ? | 14.4 ? -16% | 4.8 61% | 17.6 ? -42% | 23.2 ? -87% | 16 ? -29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.2 ? | 10.4 ? -13% | 8 13% | 12.8 ? -39% | 11.6 ? -26% | 10.8 ? -17% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -6% | -29% | -12% | -55% | -39% | |
Brightness middle | 365.4 | 438.7 20% | 322 -12% | 334.8 -8% | 419.5 15% | 325 -11% |
Brightness | 344 | 435 26% | 288 -16% | 305 -11% | 413 20% | 318 -8% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 91 7% | 72 -15% | 79 -7% | 93 9% | 95 12% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.48 -66% | 0.3 -3% | 0.34 -17% | 0.4 -38% | 0.29 -0% |
Contrast | 1260 | 914 -27% | 1073 -15% | 985 -22% | 1049 -17% | 1121 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.17 | 4.34 -37% | 3.05 4% | 4.1 -29% | 3.4 -7% | 4.33 -37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.69 | 7.3 5% | 5.23 32% | 7.28 5% | 7.4 4% | 8.6 -12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.51 | 0.72 -41% | 1.92 -276% | 3.28 -543% | 1.95 -282% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 2.4 55% | 3.11 41% | 5.6 -6% | 2 62% | 5.5 -4% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.09 105% | 2.13 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% | 2.142 103% |
CCT | 5879 111% | 6413 101% | 6553 99% | 6314 103% | 6858 95% | 7893 82% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 84 | 84.6 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 97.9 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3% /
-4% | 5% /
-12% | -14% /
-11% | -35% /
-42% | -26% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21940 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
业绩
测试条件
处理器
原始CPU性能比我们数据库中具有相同功能的普通笔记本电脑快约10%至15%。 酷睿i9-12900HK.这是个不错的提升,超过了 酷睿i7-12800H或上一代的 酷睿i7-11800H在多线程工作负载中各提升了30%。AMD最新的Zen 3+ CPU,即 Ryzen 9 6900HX,在原始CineBench基准测试中也一直较慢,但在某些AIDA64基准测试中,它将超过Core i9-12900HK。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (1828 - 7366, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (316 - 739, n=10) | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (4796 - 19282, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (819 - 1940, n=10) | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (965 - 2944, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (119 - 279, n=10) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (172.5 - 483, n=9) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Corsair One i300 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (25736 - 75564, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (2898 - 6186, n=10) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Corsair One i300 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (5869 - 14294, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (843 - 1918, n=10) | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (5.33 - 21.6, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (34.8 - 89.1, n=10) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Corsair One i300 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (0.4155 - 0.994, n=10) | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Corsair One i300 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (2677 - 9759, n=10) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (12762 - 43695, n=10) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (841 - 3504, n=10) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (60202 - 107161, n=10) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (3225 - 10402, n=10) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (7417 - 27285, n=10) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (32382 - 106367, n=10) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (314 - 1209, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (1501 - 5748, n=10) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (24991 - 40648, n=10) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7149 - 8186, n=5) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9870 - 11205, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9173 - 10422, n=5) | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10951 - 13098, n=5) | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (970 - 2138, n=5) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (921 - 2038, n=5) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1007 - 2210, n=5) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1012 - 2234, n=5) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
PCMark 10 Score | 8186 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (53861 - 62959, n=10) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (57237 - 66989, n=10) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (54443 - 65268, n=10) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HK (98.4 - 109, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 |
* ... smaller is better
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E | |
MSI GT76 Titan DT 10SGS | |
Gigabyte A7 X1 | |
Global Average -3 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能
由于其非常高的TGP目标为175W,图形性能是所有游戏笔记本电脑中最快的之一。这款 2022年的Razer Blade 15例如,它配备了相同的 GeForce RTX 3080 TiGPU,尽管其TGP目标值较低,为110W,性能慢了25%至30%。在比较Alienware的GPU和微星GS77的相同GPU时,可以观察到类似的不足之处。 微星GS77的相同GPU进行比较时,也可以看到类似的缺陷。当与快于平均水平的CPU相结合时,用户可以期望帧率略高于大多数其他配备GeForce RTX 3080图形的游戏笔记本电脑。
我们的Alienware x17 R2中的移动RTX 3080 Ti最类似于 桌面GeForce RTX 3070.A 桌面RTX 3080 Ti仍然可以提供比我们的Alienware移动版快近50%的性能。
请记住,如果在平衡模式而不是最大风扇模式下运行,图形性能会更慢。 Fire Strike 在平衡电源配置文件上,图形得分将降低约8%至9%。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (14445 - 45050, n=17) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Schenker XMG Apex 17 M21 | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
MSI GF75 Thin 10SDR |
3DMark 11 Performance | 36680 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 63911 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27925 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 13568 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (148.3 - 215, n=9) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Corsair One i300 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (110 - 171, n=11) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Alienware m17 R3 P45E |