惠普 Victus 15 游戏笔记本电脑评测:Raptor Lake 和 Ada Lovelace
虽然高档笔记本电脑的价格逐年上涨,但 2024 年的经济型笔记本电脑市场却有大量令人兴奋的产品。例如,售价不到 1000 美元的 Victus 15-fa1057ng。与众多竞争对手不同的是,它配备了GeForce RTX 4050 和 6GB GDDR6 VRAM。辅以 酷睿 i5-13500H处理器(12 核 16 线程)、16 GB DDR4-3,200 内存(2x 8 GB SO-DIMM)和 512 GB PCIe M.2 固态硬盘。处理视觉输出的是一块哑光 144 Hz 全高清 IPS 显示屏,尽管它被指定为 250 尼特和 45% NTSC - 我们认为这些值已经过时,即使对于预算部门来说也是如此。软件包中的操作系统是 Windows 11 Home(也有搭载 FreeDOS 的廉价版)。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Victus 15 的竞争对手包括其他配备 RTX 4050 和最新 CPU 的游戏笔记本电脑,如 戴尔 G15 5530以及 宏碁 Nitro V 15 ANV15-51或 华硕 TUF A15 FA507表中列出了所有这些产品的对比。
由于机箱与前代 前代采用 酷睿 i7-12700H和 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti本文将简要介绍其外壳、功能和输入设备类别。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84 % | 02/2024 | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81 % | 01/2023 | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % | 01/2024 | Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % | 01/2024 | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % | 06/2023 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例
客户收到的是一个坚固的塑料外壳,这在这个价位的产品中很常见,不过它在某些地方可能会发出一些响声,而且缺乏高级的声音和感觉。重新设计或优化铰链可能会有好处。整体稳定性相似。最明显的是,当施加较大压力时,掌托可能会大幅弯曲。Victus 15 外形美观,结合了精巧而有趣的设计特点。尺寸和重量在平均范围内,但与竞争对手相比并不特别突出。
连接性
连接范围引起了不同的反应。虽然读卡器的缺失值得注意,但惠普在当代 USB 端口上却做出了妥协。可用的 USB 端口(2 个 Type-A、1 个 Type-C 和 DisplayPort)速度被限制在 5 Gbit/s。幸运的是,HDMI 端口被生产商指定为 2.1 版本。此外,还有一个音频接口和一个 RJ45 端口(仅限于 1 Gbit LAN,而不是 2.5)。由于大部分接口都位于机箱后半部,因此使用鼠标并不困难。
SD 读卡器
读卡器的速度属于中等水平。在传输多张 jpg 图像时,我们录得了 80 MB/s 的可靠速度。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
交流
Wi-Fi 性能略显不足。在距离参考路由器 3.28 英尺的范围测试中,集成的联发科模块在同类产品中排名最后。
网络摄像头
720p 网络摄像头的性能并不出众,还有改进的余地,尤其是在图像清晰度方面。
配件
笔记本电脑随附几本信息手册和一个不太笨重的 200 瓦电源装置。
维护
维护时需要小心谨慎。虽然底板上的十字螺丝可以较快地拆卸下来,但松开固定夹却有些困难,即使使用合适的工具也是如此。图片显示的是外壳的内部结构,所有重要部件都可以接触到。
保修
保修期只有 12 个月。
输入设备
键盘
在键盘方面,布局需要一些调整。紧凑的方向箭头和 F 行的非传统排列(电源按钮不在外缘,Ins 和 Del 不相邻等)也可能会引起一些人的注意。尽管如此,键盘还是提供了令人满意的键入体验。白色照明只有两种设置:开或关,亮度不可调。
触摸板
触摸板的质量与竞争产品相当。点击表面的滑动性能和功能既不差,也不是特别好。手势支持方面也没有明显问题。触摸板的尺寸约为 4.92 x 3.15 英寸,大小适中。
显示屏
显示效果不佳是最大的缺点。虽然黑度(0.28 cd/m²)和对比度(975:1)还算不错,但亮度还有待提高。即使在室内,249 cd/m² 的平均亮度也会造成问题。Victus 15 完全不适合在户外使用。
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 273 cd/m²
Contrast: 975:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.19 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.54
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
40.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.148
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng BOE094D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 BOEhydis NV15NY9 (Dell 18PJX), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S LG LP156WFJ-SPB4 (LGD0742), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF A15 FA507 N156HMA-GA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 7% | 76% | 3% | 66% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.2 | 42 7% | 71.1 81% | 40 2% | 64.9 66% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.9 | 62.7 8% | 99.3 72% | 60 4% | 96.5 67% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.5 | 43.4 7% | 71.4 76% | 41.4 2% | 66.6 64% |
Response Times | -58% | 62% | -51% | -28% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 23.8 ? | 35.2 ? -48% | 8.5 ? 64% | 34.2 ? -44% | 30.4 ? -28% |
Response Time Black / White * | 16.3 ? | 27.2 ? -67% | 6.7 ? 59% | 25.8 ? -58% | 20.8 ? -28% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 8% | 13% | -17% | 34% | |
Brightness middle | 273 | 284.3 4% | 389 42% | 292 7% | 288 5% |
Brightness | 249 | 262 5% | 374 50% | 263 6% | 271 9% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 87 4% | 89 6% | 80 -5% | 91 8% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.17 39% | 0.35 -25% | 0.25 11% | 0.17 39% |
Contrast | 975 | 1672 71% | 1111 14% | 1168 20% | 1694 74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.19 | 4.52 13% | 3.08 41% | 7.15 -38% | 1.9 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.16 | 18.67 12% | 5.44 74% | 15.51 27% | 3.3 84% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.54 | 1.55 66% | 1.17 74% | 4.13 9% | 0.9 80% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.1 -141% | 4.4 -159% | 4.9 -188% | 2.7 -59% |
Gamma | 2.148 102% | 2.3 96% | 2.409 91% | 2.014 109% | 2.32 95% |
CCT | 6819 95% | 6529 100% | 6350 102% | 7178 91% | 6535 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-1% | 50% /
34% | -22% /
-18% | 24% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
这款 15 英寸设备在色彩空间方面饱受批评。58% 的 sRGB 色彩空间造成的结果是画面乏善可陈,限制了电影、图片和游戏的视觉吸引力。一些竞争对手,如戴尔 G15 或华硕 TUF A15,在这方面的表现要好得多。
同时,视角稳定性和响应时间也符合典型的 IPS 标准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
16.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 8.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
23.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.1 ms rise | |
↘ 12.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能
在这种配置下,Victus 15 显然是一款中端笔记本电脑。虽然 16 GB 内存目前足以满足游戏需求,但仅有的 512 GB 固态硬盘很快就会变得拥挤不堪,尤其是 15 英寸机型没有提供第二个 M.2 插槽。
测试条件
Omen Gaming Hub 可让用户影响系统行为。各种电源控制模式不仅会影响音量,还会影响性能(见表)。我们的测试都是在 "标准 "模式下进行的,因为 "性能 "模式下的帧率提升往往与噪音的增加不成比例。有趣的是,在测试设备上,尽管 FPS 数值较低,但 "安静 "模式的噪音排放始终高于 "标准 "模式。
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco | Quiet | Standard | 性能 | |
噪音 | 36 dB(A) 46 dB(A) 42 dB(A) 48 dB(A) | |||
性能 | 60 fps 锁定 54 fps 78 fps 80 fps |
处理器
酷睿 i5-13500H 属于英特尔 Raptor Lake 系列产品,具有四个带超线程的性能核心和八个不带超线程的效率核心。在基准测试结果中,它的速度介于宏碁 Nitro V 15 的 酷睿 i5-13420H和戴尔 G15 的 酷睿 i5-13450HX.其 Ryzen 7 7735HSRyzen 7735HS 的初始性能大致相当,但在循环测试中,Core i5 失分较多,性能也不太稳定。将其与前代产品进行比较有些不公平,因为老款 Victus 的酷睿 i7 更多属于高端产品。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr -2! | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 -2! | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -4! | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (11081 - 15390, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (56813 - 74251, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (2621 - 3623, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (77835 - 85727, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (7249 - 8086, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (27820 - 38336, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (62657 - 120493, n=6) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (782 - 992, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (5955 - 8495, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (20212 - 37618, n=6) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,竞争对手几乎没有共同之处。在所有情况下,PCMark 10 的总体得分都非常接近,但在内存速度方面的差异更为明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6812 - 7228, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (9521 - 10019, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (8890 - 8968, n=2) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10134 - 11405, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (267 - 267, n=2) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=162, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (530 - 545, n=2) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6812 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (36916 - 57830, n=6) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (41676 - 65633, n=6) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (36826 - 60523, n=6) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Average Intel Core i5-13500H (86.2 - 96.1, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
如果您打算使用该系统进行实时音频和视频编辑,您可能需要考虑其他选择。根据 LatencyMon 工具,出厂状态下的延迟非常适中,这可能会导致某些任务出现问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
固态硬盘的冷却效果也不理想。虽然安装的 Kioxia 硬盘在最初几次运行中取得了值得称赞的结果,但随着时间的推移,它出现了明显的节流现象,这在我们的循环测试中得到了证明。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
目前 Nvidia 显卡的性能在很大程度上取决于所选的 TDP。惠普为 Victus 15 选择了 75 瓦(包括动态升压),这对于 RTX 4050 来说相对较低,但在许多基准测试中仅得到有限的反映。总体而言,3D 性能符合该显卡的平均水平。RTX 4050 的未来表现不太乐观,因为 6GB VRAM 和 96 位接口已经成为限制高要求游戏的因素。
3DMark 11 Performance | 25418 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 189586 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 55024 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 19211 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8149 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
不过,Victus 15 的速度足够快,在原始分辨率为 1,920 x 1,080 的高至最高设置下,可以流畅运行当前的大多数游戏。它仅在个别情况下面临挑战,例如 笼罩.事实上,RTX 4050 的最大 TDP 为 75 瓦,与 TGP 更高的笔记本电脑相比,并没有任何明显的影响,这与合成测试类似。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=38) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
Asus TUF A15 FA507 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (14.9 - 101.7, n=30) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
Enshrouded - 1920x1080 Max. Quality AA:FX | |
Average of class Gaming (21.3 - 101.5, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Scout E20 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (37.3 - 37.7, n=2) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng |
Palworld - 1920x1080 Epic Preset AA:TSR | |
Average of class Gaming (21.1 - 150.9, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Scout E20 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (71.9 - 74.9, n=2) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
Medion Erazer Scout E20 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (349 - 353, n=2) | |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
Average of class Gaming (22.1 - 358, n=7, last 2 years) |
我们测试了 3D 性能在较长时间内的表现,特别是在角色扮演游戏 60 分钟内的表现。 游戏Witcher 3(全高清/超高清)。帧速率长期保持相当稳定。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
GTA V (2015) | 172.4 | 160.7 | 89.1 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 78 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 159.7 | 141.1 | 130.7 | 122.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 105.1 | 80.3 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 113 | 101.1 | 81.5 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 197.1 | 159 | 139.1 | |
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 352 | 350 | 349 | |
Palworld (2024) | 93.3 | 72.5 | 71.9 | |
Enshrouded (2024) | 45.8 | 45.1 | 37.3 |
排放量
系统噪音
我们认为噪音发展符合预期。在 "标准 "模式下,这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑的噪音为 29-31 分贝(空闲)和 40-48 分贝(负载),既不是非常安静,也不是非常响亮,而是达到了中等水平,即使不戴耳机,大多数买家也能接受。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29 / 30 / 31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40 / 48 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H | Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13420H | Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 7% | 4% | -4% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 24.8 1% | 25 -0% | 25 -0% | 23.3 7% |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 26.2 10% | 25 14% | 25 14% | 23.3 20% |
Idle Average * | 30 | 29.2 3% | 26 13% | 29 3% | 23.3 22% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 29.4 5% | 30 3% | 30 3% | 23.3 25% |
Load Average * | 40 | 29.9 25% | 38 5% | 49 -23% | 29.6 26% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 41.1 2% | 44 -5% | 49 -17% | 43 -2% |
Load Maximum * | 48 | 45.5 5% | 50 -4% | 51 -6% | 43 10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱温度出奇地低。即使使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行了一小时的压力测试,机箱温度也仅为 107.6 °F。 这意味着 Victus 15 可以在游戏时轻松地放在腿上。在某些情况下,竞争对手的温度明显更高。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.6 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-4.1 °C / -7.4 F).
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13500H | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H | Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13450HX | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i5-13420H | Asus TUF A15 FA507 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | -30% | -14% | -13% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 37.2 11% | 58 -38% | 46 -10% | 48.9 -16% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 35.4 16% | 57 -36% | 48 -14% | 44.6 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24 | 22.4 7% | 30 -25% | 27 -13% | 27.1 -13% |
Idle Bottom * | 24 | 22.6 6% | 29 -21% | 28 -17% | 27.5 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
这些组件没有带来令人不快的意外。在长时间满负荷运行后,CPU 稳定在约 176 °F,而 GPU 则保持在平均 158 °F,在这种情况下也是完全可以接受的。
发言人
如果可能,应连接耳机或外置扬声器来欣赏媒体。Victus 15 的 2.0 音频系统在音频分析中仅获得了中等分数,在低音重现和最大音量方面存在明显不足。
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 56% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 66% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
适中的功耗值得赞赏。考虑到现有性能,5-9 瓦的空闲功耗和 72-176 瓦的负载功耗是合理的。电源装置尺寸适中。
Off / Standby | 0.1 / Watt |
Idle | 5 / 9 / 22 Watt |
Load |
72 / 176 Watt |
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | -21% | 9% | -14% | -82% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 5.1 -2% | 2 60% | 7 -40% | 8 -60% | 13.8 ? -176% |
Idle Average * | 9 | 15.1 -68% | 12 -33% | 8 11% | 12.1 -34% | 19.2 ? -113% |
Idle Maximum * | 22 | 18.9 14% | 27 -23% | 11 50% | 12.5 43% | 27 ? -23% |
Load Average * | 72 | 114.5 -59% | 100 -39% | 76 -6% | 74.9 -4% | 111.3 ? -55% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 113 | 113.9 -1% | 161.9 -43% | 98.2 13% | 136.6 -21% | |
Load Maximum * | 176 | 165.8 6% | 262 -49% | 136 23% | 185 -5% | 251 ? -43% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑在运行时间方面也不落后于竞争对手--相反。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,惠普的新产品在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下持续了约 7.5 小时,这对于一款游戏笔记本来说是个不错的结果。由于一个错误,前代产品的数值可能要差很多。
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Dell G15 5530, i5-13450HX RTX 4050 i5-13450HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | Asus TUF A15 FA507 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -72% | -6% | 25% | 56% | -18% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 448 | 127 -72% | 423 -6% | 561 25% | 701 56% | 368 ? -18% |
Reader / Idle | 155 | 1290 | 546 ? | |||
Load | 65 | 100 | 59 | 84.7 ? | ||
H.264 | 747 | 397 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决
Victus 15-fa1057ng 是一款典型的经济型游戏笔记本电脑,主要面向注重价格的游戏玩家。
塑料外壳虽然没有体现出高品质的工艺,但与输入设备一样可靠地履行了自己的职责。硬件与全高清分辨率配合得很好,为大多数游戏提供了不错的游戏体验,尽管 144 Hz 显示屏没有得到充分利用。来自 酷睿 i5-13500H和 GeForce RTX 4050仍在可控范围内。
一个优势是电池续航时间大大延长。
不过,用户必须接受色彩准确度和亮度有限的显示屏。对于那些优先考虑图像质量的用户来说,类似戴尔 G15 5530 或华硕 TUF A15 FA507 这样价格相近的替代品可能值得考虑。因此,改进显示质量将是继任者的一大进步。
价格和供应情况
惠普 Victus 15 配备了酷睿 i5-13500H,在各大在线零售商(如亚马逊)的售价约为 690 美元。
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng
-
01/31/2024 v7
Florian Glaser
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.