惠普Victus 15笔记本电脑回顾。昂贵的预算游戏玩家

惠普Victus系列由经济型游戏笔记本组成,与制造商的高端Omen系列形成对比。因此,Victus模型具有较低的规格和有限的可配置选项,以保持低价格和竞争力。到目前为止,该系列有两个型号。15.6英寸的Victus 15和16.1英寸的 胜利者16.
我们的测试单元是Victus 15,配备了英特尔第12代酷睿i7-12700H处理器,GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,144 Hz 1080p IPS显示屏,以及仅8GB内存,零售价约为1200至1300美元。更少的SKU有酷睿i7-12650H、AMD Ryzen 7 5800H、RTX 3050或60 Hz 1080p显示屏,价格低几百美元,但我们的CPU和GPU配置是该机型的最高配置。
Victus 15的竞争对手包括其他入门级15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 戴尔G5 15, 联想IdeaPad Gaming 3, 微星GF或 GP系列, 或 华硕TUF系列.
更多惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81 % | 01/2023 | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.8 % | HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
82.7 % | 10/2021 | Dell G15 5515 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.9 % | 08/2022 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
78.2 % | 04/2022 | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M | 2.3 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.5 % | 11/2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 预算中的好看的东西
该系统既大又重,比更昂贵的 Omen 15尽管Victus 15是一台较慢的笔记本电脑。值得庆幸的是,它不像竞争对手戴尔G15那样笨重,但它仍然偏重于2.3公斤。华硕 华硕TUF Dash F15 相比之下要轻几百克。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
除了一个USB-A端口,Omen 15上的所有端口都出现在Victus 15上。这里不支持Thunderbolt,可能是为了节省成本。
可以说,端口定位比戴尔G15或联想G15上的更好。 联想Legion 5 15因为惠普的后部没有端口,更容易接触到。
SD卡阅读器
我们很惊讶地看到一个集成的SD卡读卡器,因为许多经济型游戏笔记本电脑都省略了它。传输速度仅相当于 读取器的一半。或 Razer Blade但它比没有读卡器要好。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB |
网络摄像头
网络摄像头是基本的100万像素传感器,没有红外或甚至隐私快门。惠普拥有一些最好的笔记本电脑网络摄像头,正如在最新的Spectre上看到的那样。 最新的Spectre和 EliteBook模型因此,我们的Victus上模糊的网络摄像头显然是一种削减成本的措施。

维护
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的制造商有限保修。
输入设备 - 宽大的键盘和点击板
键盘
更多的游戏笔记本开始整合数字键盘,Victus 15也不例外。我们特别欣赏的是,与戴尔G15或华硕TUF Dash F15上狭窄的数字键盘不同,数字键盘不比主要的QWERTY键窄。
在Victus上,打字时的按键反馈略微柔和,因此更加安静。然而,回车键和退格键有点太软,可以从更坚定的反馈中受益。
单区白色背光是照亮所有按键和符号的标准配置,而其他大多数游戏笔记本都有RGB选项。这里甚至没有背光亮度设置--要么开,要么关,中间没有任何设置。
触摸板
显示屏 - 仅1080p
有以下四种显示方式可供选择。
- 1920 x 1080, 60 Hz, 250 nits, TN
- 1920 x 1080,60 Hz,250尼特,IPS
- 1920 x 1080,144赫兹,250尼特,IPS
- 1920 x 1080,60赫兹,300尼特,IPS
所有选项都是哑光的,没有OLED或更高分辨率的面板可供选择。我们的具体评测单位配备了上述加粗选项,以获得更流畅的用户体验,但糟糕的色彩和平均响应时间是将Victus 15与拥有更好显示屏的更昂贵的游戏笔记本区分开来的主要因素。胜利者 Omen 16系列例如,它提供了完整的sRGB覆盖率和更快的响应时间。
对比度对于经济型游戏笔记本来说至少是非常好的,约为1500:1。即便如此,由于面板的色域有限,颜色和内容并不突出。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 284.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1672:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.55
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Omen 15-en0375ng BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G15 5515 BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB CSOT MNF601CA1-3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -8% | 94% | 0% | 62% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 42 | 39.12 -7% | 39.1 -7% | 95.8 128% | 42.1 0% | 69.1 65% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.7 | 57.6 -8% | 56.9 -9% | 99.9 59% | 62.8 0% | 99.5 59% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.4 | 40.42 -7% | 40.4 -7% | 85.1 96% | 43.6 0% | 70 61% |
Response Times | 19% | 33% | 69% | 22% | 57% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 30.4 ? 14% | 25.2 ? 28% | 8.4 ? 76% | 25.6 ? 27% | 14.8 ? 58% |
Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 20.8 ? 24% | 16.8 ? 38% | 10.4 ? 62% | 22.8 ? 16% | 12 ? 56% |
PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? | ||||
Screen | -31% | -43% | -9% | -37% | -3% | |
Brightness middle | 284.3 | 297 4% | 278 -2% | 354.2 25% | 265.1 -7% | 363.5 28% |
Brightness | 262 | 275 5% | 262 0% | 330 26% | 245 -6% | 350 34% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 83 -5% | 88 1% | 87 0% | 89 2% |
Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.33 -94% | 0.36 -112% | 0.32 -88% | 0.35 -106% | 0.39 -129% |
Contrast | 1672 | 900 -46% | 772 -54% | 1107 -34% | 757 -55% | 932 -44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.52 | 4.54 -0% | 5.74 -27% | 4.06 10% | 4.68 -4% | 3.68 19% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.67 | 18.92 -1% | 19.63 -5% | 8.81 53% | 19.96 -7% | 8.92 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.55 | 4.66 -201% | 4.7 -203% | 3.7 -139% | 0.53 66% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 2.1 49% | 3.1 24% | 6.7 -63% | 4.5 -10% | 6.5 -59% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.066 106% | 2.011 109% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6529 100% | 6291 103% | 6207 105% | 6731 97% | 6632 98% | 5995 108% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-19% | -6% /
-24% | 51% /
27% | -5% /
-21% | 39% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18925 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
哑光面板的亮度不够,无法在户外舒适地观看。眩光是永远存在的,颜色也因此而变得模糊不清。你必须投资于价格较高的游戏笔记本电脑,其显示屏更亮,如 Razer Blade 15在户外更容易看到。
性能 - 英特尔Alder Lake-H第12代产品
测试条件
处理器 - 有限的涡轮增压
CPU性能很好,但性能的可持续性可以更好。如下图所示,在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,性能会下降多达28%。即使在性能模式下运行系统并激活HP Boost,也会出现这种下降,这在游戏笔记本上看到是令人失望的。这 联想Legion 5 15笔记本,它配备了相同的 酷睿i7-12700HCPU,可以提供46%的多线程性能,因为它的CPU几乎没有那么严重的节流。
选择价格较低的 AMD Ryzen 5800H与我们的酷睿i7-12700H相比,Victus 15的SKU将导致约20%至25%的性能下降。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=61) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=62) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=62) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=68) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=63) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=61) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=62) | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=61) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=61) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=61) | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=61) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=61) | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=61) | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=61) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=61) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=61) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=61) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=61) | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=61) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Dell G15 5515 |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (6623 - 7075, n=5) | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (9540 - 10970, n=5) | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8530 - 9555, n=5) | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8855 - 9542, n=5) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Dell G15 5515 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1654 - 1872, n=5) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1595 - 1792, n=5) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1699 - 1993, n=5) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1383 - 1768, n=5) | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr |
PCMark 10 Score | 6918 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=61) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Dell G15 5515 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=61) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Dell G15 5515 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=61) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Dell G15 5515 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=61) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Dell G15 5515 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的测试装置包括一个快速 三星PM9A1PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速度分别高达6900 MB/s和5000 MB/s。然而,正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环测试结果所示,性能在大约5分钟的压力后会出现节流。虽然零节流是最好的,但延迟的性能损失不太可能影响用户体验。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Dell G15 5515 | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 75 W TGP
图形性能可与较早的 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti或 移动RTX 2060同时比标准的 移动RTX 3050.RTX 3050系列一直有些令人失望,因为竞争者是 Radeon RX 6600M售价大致相同,但性能快50%。即便如此,大多数游戏仍然可以在原生1080p分辨率下播放,包括赛博朋克2077。
我们惊讶地看到,尽管我们的系统内存只有8GB,但大多数游戏仍然可以运行得非常好。除了像《赛博朋克2077》这样要求非常高的游戏,如果在Ultra设置下,性能可能会慢10%左右外,平均帧率是我们期望的,与其他具有相同GPU的笔记本电脑相比是如此。
高级图形功能,如Optimus 2.0、集成G-Sync或MUX,在这台预算机上不被支持。没有 GeForce RTX 3060或更高的选项,也没有。
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7917 - 15611, n=26) | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (3744 - 6122, n=27) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |