Notebookcheck Logo

惠普Victus 15笔记本电脑回顾。昂贵的预算游戏玩家

GeForce RTX 3050 Ti的老化程度不高。 Victus 15应该是Omen系列的一个钱包友好型替代品,但是它的零售价很高,为1200美元的入门级GPU,其性能几乎与两年前的GTX 1660 Ti相同,走了一条细线。
Alder Lake Laptop / Notebook Gaming Geforce

惠普Victus系列由经济型游戏笔记本组成,与制造商的高端Omen系列形成对比。因此,Victus模型具有较低的规格和有限的可配置选项,以保持低价格和竞争力。到目前为止,该系列有两个型号。15.6英寸的Victus 15和16.1英寸的 胜利者16.

我们的测试单元是Victus 15,配备了英特尔第12代酷睿i7-12700H处理器,GeForce RTX 3050 Ti,144 Hz 1080p IPS显示屏,以及仅8GB内存,零售价约为1200至1300美元。更少的SKU有酷睿i7-12650H、AMD Ryzen 7 5800H、RTX 3050或60 Hz 1080p显示屏,价格低几百美元,但我们的CPU和GPU配置是该机型的最高配置。

Victus 15的竞争对手包括其他入门级15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 戴尔G5 15, 联想IdeaPad Gaming 3, 微星GFGP系列, 或 华硕TUF系列.

更多惠普评论。

HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Victus 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1468 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, 527.56, Optimus
Memory
8 GB 
, Micron DDR4-3200, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN1521, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headset, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23.6 x 358 x 255
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 720p30
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: B&O Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes
Weight
2.331 kg, Power Supply: 641 g
Price
1300 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
81 %
01/2023
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23.6 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.8 %
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2.2 kg23 mm15.60"1920x1080
82.7 %
10/2021
Dell G15 5515
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg24.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.9 %
08/2022
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1.9 kg20.7 mm15.60"2560x1440
78.2 %
04/2022
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
2.3 kg24.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.5 %
11/2022
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.99 mm15.60"1920x1080

案例 - 预算中的好看的东西

机箱由更锐利的轮廓和更大的后部组成,与Omen 15的更简单和更方正的外观形成对比。 Omen 1516.这是一个令人不快的全黑设计,没有任何不必要的表面口音或明显的 "玩家 "美学,而其他入门级游戏笔记本电脑往往有这种美学。

机箱的硬度比Omen系列低了一个档次,特别是在铰链方面。显示器在调整角度时往往会吱吱作响,铰链在全部打开时感觉不是很结实。另外,对于一个预算系统来说,底座是相当不错的,在试图扭转它时只有轻微的翘起。

该系统既大又重,比更昂贵的 Omen 15尽管Victus 15是一台较慢的笔记本电脑。值得庆幸的是,它不像竞争对手戴尔G15那样笨重,但它仍然偏重于2.3公斤。华硕 华硕TUF Dash F15 相比之下要轻几百克。

有三种颜色可供选择。黑色、深蓝色和白色
有三种颜色可供选择。黑色、深蓝色和白色
哑光表面随着时间的推移很容易积累难看的油脂和指纹
哑光表面随着时间的推移很容易积累难看的油脂和指纹
盖子打开到最大角度(~150度)。
盖子打开到最大角度(~150度)。
从上到下都是光滑的单色底盘。外盖是铝制的,而底座是塑料的。
从上到下都是光滑的单色底盘。外盖是铝制的,而底座是塑料的。
铰链相对较弱,在最大角度时有明显的吱吱声。
铰链相对较弱,在最大角度时有明显的吱吱声。
沿着后部和大部分底部有大量的通风格栅
沿着后部和大部分底部有大量的通风格栅

尺寸比较

359 mm 259 mm 24.95 mm 2.3 kg357.26 mm 272.11 mm 24.9 mm 2.4 kg358 mm 255 mm 23.6 mm 2.3 kg358 mm 240 mm 23 mm 2.2 kg358.8 mm 262.35 mm 19.99 mm 2.4 kg354 mm 251 mm 20.7 mm 1.9 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt

除了一个USB-A端口,Omen 15上的所有端口都出现在Victus 15上。这里不支持Thunderbolt,可能是为了节省成本。

可以说,端口定位比戴尔G15或联想G15上的更好。 联想Legion 5 15因为惠普的后部没有端口,更容易接触到。

前面。没有端口
前面。没有端口
右边。USB-C (5 Gbps) w/ DisplayPort 1.4, Gigabit RJ-45, USB-A (5 Gbps), HDMI 2.1
右边。USB-C (5 Gbps) w/ DisplayPort 1.4, Gigabit RJ-45, USB-A (5 Gbps), HDMI 2.1
后方。没有端口
后方。没有端口
左边:AC适配器、USB-A(5Gbps)、3.5毫米耳机、SD读卡器
左边:AC适配器、USB-A(5Gbps)、3.5毫米耳机、SD读卡器

SD卡阅读器

我们很惊讶地看到一个集成的SD卡读卡器,因为许多经济型游戏笔记本电脑都省略了它。传输速度仅相当于 读取器的一半。Razer Blade但它比没有读卡器要好。

完全插入的SD卡几乎与机箱的边缘齐平,便于安全运输。
完全插入的SD卡几乎与机箱的边缘齐平,便于安全运输。
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
148.5 (139.82min - 150.43max) MB/s ∼100% +105%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
141.3 (140.8min - 141.54max) MB/s ∼95% +95%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83.2 MB/s ∼56% +15%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.4 MB/s ∼49%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
71 MB/s ∼48% -2%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
59 MB/s ∼40% -19%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
210.33 MB/s ∼100% +147%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
185.04 MB/s ∼88% +118%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
88 MB/s ∼42% +4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
85 MB/s ∼40%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
82.3 MB/s ∼39% -3%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
81.3 MB/s ∼39% -4%

沟通

包括一个联发科MT7921,用于2x2 Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.2连接。英特尔AX211是为Wi-Fi 6E提供的额外费用。在我们的测试中,尽管性能落后于其他大多数采用英特尔AX解决方案的笔记本电脑,但传输率还是很稳定。

可拆卸的WLAN模块
可拆卸的WLAN模块
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1448 (759min - 1518max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1122 (911min - 1241max) MBit/s ∼77%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
642 MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 receive AX12
Dell G15 5515
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1437 (1264min - 1567max) MBit/s ∼100%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1330 (1258min - 1404max) MBit/s ∼93%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
542 MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1538 (1343min - 1633max) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1427 (759min - 1517max) MBit/s ∼100% +76%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1148 (593min - 1213max) MBit/s ∼80% +42%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
MediaTek MT7921
811 (699min - 859max) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1278 (997min - 1422max) MBit/s ∼100% +57%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1122 (746min - 1279max) MBit/s ∼88% +38%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
MediaTek MT7921
816 (759min - 856max) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1237 (634min - 1339max) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250Tooltip
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (759-856)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1122 (746-1279)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø810 (699-859)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1128 (593-1213)

网络摄像头

网络摄像头是基本的100万像素传感器,没有红外或甚至隐私快门。惠普拥有一些最好的笔记本电脑网络摄像头,正如在最新的Spectre上看到的那样。 最新的SpectreEliteBook模型因此,我们的Victus上模糊的网络摄像头显然是一种削减成本的措施。

ColorChecker
8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Victus 15 fa0020nr: 10.98 ∆E min: 3.2 - max: 16.83 ∆E

维护

底部面板由七颗飞利浦螺钉固定,相对来说比较容易维修。用户可以直接访问单个M.2 PCIe4 x4 2280插槽,可拆卸的WLAN模块和2个SODIMM插槽。竞争对手华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC最多支持两个M.2固态硬盘,而我们的惠普只能支持一个。

配件和保修

除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的制造商有限保修。

输入设备 - 宽大的键盘和点击板

键盘

更多的游戏笔记本开始整合数字键盘,Victus 15也不例外。我们特别欣赏的是,与戴尔G15或华硕TUF Dash F15上狭窄的数字键盘不同,数字键盘不比主要的QWERTY键窄。

在Victus上,打字时的按键反馈略微柔和,因此更加安静。然而,回车键和退格键有点太软,可以从更坚定的反馈中受益。

单区白色背光是照亮所有按键和符号的标准配置,而其他大多数游戏笔记本都有RGB选项。这里甚至没有背光亮度设置--要么开,要么关,中间没有任何设置。

触摸板

宽大的点击板只是比Legion 5 15上的点击板稍大一些(12.5 x 8厘米对12.5 x 7.5厘米)。在塑料表面上的牵引力很平稳,只有在较慢的速度下才有一点粘性,以便更准确地输入。集成的按键也很有弹性,不会太松弛。

点击板的两个最大缺点是按下时的反馈声很大,而且总体上容易积聚指纹。预计在很短的时间内,掌托、按键和点击板就会显得光亮而油腻。

Victus 15键盘将Omen 15上较大的方向键换成了一个集成的数字键盘。
Victus 15键盘将Omen 15上较大的方向键换成了一个集成的数字键盘。
新的点击板看起来不错,但很快就会变脏。
新的点击板看起来不错,但很快就会变脏。
按键反馈适中,并带有类似于Omen系列的安静的咔哒声。
按键反馈适中,并带有类似于Omen系列的安静的咔哒声。
数字键盘的大小与QWERTY键相同,这在许多笔记本电脑上是不常见的。
数字键盘的大小与QWERTY键相同,这在许多笔记本电脑上是不常见的。

显示屏 - 仅1080p

有以下四种显示方式可供选择。

  • 1920 x 1080, 60 Hz, 250 nits, TN
  • 1920 x 1080,60 Hz,250尼特,IPS
  • 1920 x 1080,144赫兹,250尼特,IPS
  • 1920 x 1080,60赫兹,300尼特,IPS

所有选项都是哑光的,没有OLED或更高分辨率的面板可供选择。我们的具体评测单位配备了上述加粗选项,以获得更流畅的用户体验,但糟糕的色彩和平均响应时间是将Victus 15与拥有更好显示屏的更昂贵的游戏笔记本区分开来的主要因素。胜利者 Omen 16系列例如,它提供了完整的sRGB覆盖率和更快的响应时间。

对比度对于经济型游戏笔记本来说至少是非常好的,约为1500:1。即便如此,由于面板的色域有限,颜色和内容并不突出。

没有边缘到边缘的玻璃、OLED或1440p+分辨率选项
没有边缘到边缘的玻璃、OLED或1440p+分辨率选项
狭窄的侧边框
狭窄的侧边框
哑光面板只是比亮光的替代品稍有颗粒感。
哑光面板只是比亮光的替代品稍有颗粒感。
沿着墙角有适度不均匀的背光渗出
沿着墙角有适度不均匀的背光渗出
265.3
cd/m²
266.4
cd/m²
251.2
cd/m²
264.1
cd/m²
284.3
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
249.8
cd/m²
279.5
cd/m²
251
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
CMN1521
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 284.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 262.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14.82 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 284.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1672:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.55
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Dell G15 5515
BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
CSOT MNF601CA1-3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display
-7%
-8%
94%
0%
62%
Display P3 Coverage
42
39.12
-7%
39.1
-7%
95.8
128%
42.1
0%
69.1
65%
sRGB Coverage
62.7
57.6
-8%
56.9
-9%
99.9
59%
62.8
0%
99.5
59%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
43.4
40.42
-7%
40.4
-7%
85.1
96%
43.6
0%
70
61%
Response Times
19%
33%
69%
22%
57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.2 ?(18, 17.2)
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
14%
25.2 ?(12.4, 12.8)
28%
8.4 ?(4.4, 4)
76%
25.6 ?(14, 11.6)
27%
14.8 ?(8, 6.8)
58%
Response Time Black / White *
27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6)
20.8 ?(11.6, 9.2)
24%
16.8 ?(9.2, 7.6)
38%
10.4 ?(6.4, 4)
62%
22.8 ?(13.2, 9.6)
16%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
56%
PWM Frequency
200 ?(99)
200 ?(99)
Screen
-31%
-43%
-9%
-37%
-3%
Brightness middle
284.3
297
4%
278
-2%
354.2
25%
265.1
-7%
363.5
28%
Brightness
262
275
5%
262
0%
330
26%
245
-6%
350
34%
Brightness Distribution
87
88
1%
83
-5%
88
1%
87
0%
89
2%
Black Level *
0.17
0.33
-94%
0.36
-112%
0.32
-88%
0.35
-106%
0.39
-129%
Contrast
1672
900
-46%
772
-54%
1107
-34%
757
-55%
932
-44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.52
4.54
-0%
5.74
-27%
4.06
10%
4.68
-4%
3.68
19%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
18.67
18.92
-1%
19.63
-5%
8.81
53%
19.96
-7%
8.92
52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.55
4.66
-201%
4.7
-203%
3.7
-139%
0.53
66%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.1
2.1
49%
3.1
24%
6.7
-63%
4.5
-10%
6.5
-59%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.066 106%
2.011 109%
2.12 104%
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
CCT
6529 100%
6291 103%
6207 105%
6731 97%
6632 98%
5995 108%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-6% / -19%
-6% / -24%
51% / 27%
-5% / -21%
39% / 19%

* ... smaller is better

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3

该显示器在开箱时没有经过校准,其平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别高达4.1和4.52。自己校准面板会使这些值分别降至0.6和1.55,但由于上述狭窄的sRGB覆盖范围,较高的饱和度水平仍然非常不准确。我们下面的Calman屏幕截图显示,特别是蓝色和洋红色的颜色比其他颜色更不准确。

我们建议应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件,这可以帮助提高较低饱和度水平的色彩准确性。

校准前的灰度
校准前的灰度
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的饱和扫频
校准前的ColorChecker
校准前的ColorChecker
校准后的灰度
校准后的灰度
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的饱和扫频
校准后的ColorChecker
校准后的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.6 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 17.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18925 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

哑光面板的亮度不够,无法在户外舒适地观看。眩光是永远存在的,颜色也因此而变得模糊不清。你必须投资于价格较高的游戏笔记本电脑,其显示屏更亮,如 Razer Blade 15在户外更容易看到。

阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
在户外的阴凉处
在户外的阴凉处
阳光下的室外
阳光下的室外
宽广的IPS可视角度。只有从极端角度观看时,颜色和对比度才会下降
宽广的IPS可视角度。只有从极端角度观看时,颜色和对比度才会下降

性能 - 英特尔Alder Lake-H第12代产品

 

测试条件

在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和预装的Omen Gaming Hub软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式。我们还确保启用HP Boost模式和Nvidia GPU,如下面的截图所示。事实上,在多个菜单下隐藏着许多单独的电源设置,特别是当你在较低和较高的性能水平之间不断切换时,会令人感到沮丧。

处理器 - 有限的涡轮增压

CPU性能很好,但性能的可持续性可以更好。如下图所示,在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,性能会下降多达28%。即使在性能模式下运行系统并激活HP Boost,也会出现这种下降,这在游戏笔记本上看到是令人失望的。这 联想Legion 5 15笔记本,它配备了相同的 酷睿i7-12700HCPU,可以提供46%的多线程性能,因为它的CPU几乎没有那么严重的节流。

选择价格较低的 AMD Ryzen 5800H与我们的酷睿i7-12700H相比,Victus 15的SKU将导致约20%至25%的性能下降。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1980 (1935.64-2695.78)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2876 (2825.86-2915.88)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2360 (2296.08-2730.75)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
87.8 pt ∼88%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
83.1 pt ∼83%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
82.4 pt ∼82%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
76.3 pt ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
74.6 pt ∼75%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.1 pt ∼73%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
66.7 pt ∼67%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
65.4 pt ∼65%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58.2 pt ∼58%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
55.1 pt ∼55%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
54.7 pt ∼55%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng -2!
Intel Core i5-10300H
42.5 pt ∼43%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
22456 (19998.9min - 22456.2max) Points ∼100% +47%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
19330 (18286.2min - 19329.7max) Points ∼86% +27%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
16575 Points ∼74% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=62)
15624 Points ∼70% +2%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
15386 Points ∼69% +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
15271 (12272min - 15271.4max) Points ∼68%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13149 Points ∼59% -14%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
12076 (11562.4min - 12075.6max) Points ∼54% -21%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11912 Points ∼53% -22%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
11267 Points ∼50% -26%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
9223 (9127.25min - 9223.34max) Points ∼41% -40%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
1888 Points ∼100% +8%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
1828 Points ∼97% +4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1812 Points ∼96% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points ∼96% +3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
1770 Points ∼94% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=61)
1757 Points ∼93% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1488 Points ∼79% -15%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1417 Points ∼75% -19%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1376 Points ∼73% -22%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1248 Points ∼66% -29%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
8564 Points ∼100% +45%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
7407 Points ∼86% +25%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
6812 Points ∼80% +15%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=62)
5926 Points ∼69% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5921 Points ∼69%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
5383 Points ∼63% -9%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5158 Points ∼60% -13%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
4627 Points ∼54% -22%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4588 Points ∼54% -23%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4380 Points ∼51% -26%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3565 Points ∼42% -40%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
2240 Points ∼26% -62%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
732 Points ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
706 Points ∼96% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
698 Points ∼95% +2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
681 Points ∼93%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
680 Points ∼93% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=62)
678 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
676 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
583 Points ∼80% -14%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼76% -19%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
537 Points ∼73% -21%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
486 Points ∼66% -29%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
454 Points ∼62% -33%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
3383 (3163.31min - 3383.24max) Points ∼100% +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
2916 (2825.86min - 2915.88max) Points ∼86% +8%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
2721 (2470.66min - 2721.46max) Points ∼80% +1%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
2697 (2132.31min - 2697.42max) Points ∼80% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
2696 (1935.64min - 2695.78max) Points ∼80%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=68)
2517 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2176 Points ∼64% -19%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1968 Points ∼58% -27%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1909 (1812.99min - 1909.31max) Points ∼56% -29%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
1840 (1786.43min - 1839.59max) Points ∼54% -32%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1516 (1493.93min - 1515.9max) Points ∼45% -44%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
907 Points ∼27% -66%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points ∼100% +7%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
266 Points ∼97% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼95% +2%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
260 Points ∼95% +2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=63)
253 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
248 Points ∼90% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
241 Points ∼88% -6%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼83% -11%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
223 Points ∼81% -13%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
190 Points ∼69% -26%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
188 Points ∼68% -27%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
481.4 Seconds * ∼100% -106%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
333 Seconds * ∼69% -42%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
268 Seconds * ∼56% -15%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
259 Seconds * ∼54% -11%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
259 Seconds * ∼54% -11%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
234 Seconds * ∼49%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
229.9 Seconds * ∼48% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=61)
224 Seconds * ∼47% +4%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
220 Seconds * ∼46% +6%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
186 Seconds * ∼39% +21%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
168 Seconds * ∼35% +28%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
153.1 Seconds * ∼32% +35%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
76947 MIPS ∼100% +51%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
70549 MIPS ∼92% +39%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
70322 MIPS ∼91% +38%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
62231 MIPS ∼81% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=61)
60268 MIPS ∼78% +18%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
55954 MIPS ∼73% +10%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53762 MIPS ∼70% +6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
50905 MIPS ∼66%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50075 MIPS ∼65% -2%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
48051 MIPS ∼62% -6%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
45162 MIPS ∼59% -11%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
24768 MIPS ∼32% -51%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
5848 MIPS ∼100% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
5826 MIPS ∼100%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
5797 MIPS ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
5761 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5678 MIPS ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=61)
5644 MIPS ∼97% -3%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
5624 MIPS ∼96% -3%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5538 MIPS ∼95% -5%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
5387 MIPS ∼92% -8%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
5348 MIPS ∼91% -8%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4951 MIPS ∼85% -15%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4638 MIPS ∼79% -20%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
14213 Points ∼100% +37%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
13844 Points ∼97% +34%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
12998 Points ∼91% +26%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
12008 Points ∼84% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=62)
11710 Points ∼82% +13%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
10348 Points ∼73%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
9758 Points ∼69% -6%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
8073 Points ∼57% -22%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
7607 Points ∼54% -26%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7441 Points ∼52% -28%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
6911 Points ∼49% -33%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4722 Points ∼33% -54%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
4720 Points ∼33% -54%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
1863 Points ∼100% +5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points ∼96%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
1771 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1759 Points ∼94% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
1755 Points ∼94% -2%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
1741 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=62)
1731 Points ∼93% -3%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1496 Points ∼80% -16%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1453 Points ∼78% -18%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
1445 Points ∼78% -19%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1241 Points ∼67% -30%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
1235 Points ∼66% -31%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1203 Points ∼65% -32%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
24.9 fps ∼100% +59%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
21.8 fps ∼88% +39%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
20.5 fps ∼82% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=62)
16.7 fps ∼67% +6%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
16.2 fps ∼65% +3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
15.7 fps ∼63%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.3 fps ∼61% -3%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.3 fps ∼57% -9%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
13.9 fps ∼56% -11%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
12.9 fps ∼52% -18%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
11.9 fps ∼48% -24%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
7.78 fps ∼31% -50%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
107 s * ∼100% -117%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
69.2 s * ∼65% -40%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
57.6 s * ∼54% -17%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.4 s * ∼49% -6%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
49.4 s * ∼46% -0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
49.3 s * ∼46%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
47.1 s * ∼44% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=61)
45.8 s * ∼43% +7%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
42 s * ∼39% +15%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
41.3 s * ∼39% +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
40.1 s * ∼37% +19%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
23.85 s * ∼22% +52%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
Intel Core i5-10300H
0.63 sec * ∼100% -34%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.575 sec * ∼91% -22%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
0.537 sec * ∼85% -14%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼82% -10%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.512 sec * ∼81% -9%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H
0.4786 sec * ∼76% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=61)
0.4724 sec * ∼75% -0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4715 sec * ∼75%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
0.459 sec * ∼73% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4581 sec * ∼73% +3%
Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.455 sec * ∼72% +3%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4358 sec * ∼69% +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2696 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
216 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
256 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95.9 pt ∼96%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
79.2 pt ∼79%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
77.9 pt ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
70.6 pt ∼71%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
67 pt ∼67%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
63.5 pt ∼64%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
45.3 pt ∼45%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
17957 KRay/s ∼100% +41%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
14111 KRay/s ∼79% +11%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
14048 KRay/s ∼78% +11%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12692 KRay/s ∼71%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=61)
10801 KRay/s ∼60% -15%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
10654 KRay/s ∼59% -16%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
5422 KRay/s ∼30% -57%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
88152 Points ∼100% +40%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
87981 Points ∼100% +40%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
76466 Points ∼87% +22%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
68121 Points ∼77% +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62814 Points ∼71%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=61)
52646 Points ∼60% -16%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
26386 Points ∼30% -58%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4242 MB/s ∼100% +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=61)
3078 MB/s ∼73% +7%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
3016 MB/s ∼71% +5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2876 MB/s ∼68%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
2483 MB/s ∼59% -14%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
2319 MB/s ∼55% -19%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
1979 MB/s ∼47% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
103202 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
102409 Points ∼99%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
98068 Points ∼95% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=61)
97871 Points ∼95% -4%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
95763 Points ∼93% -6%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
75120 Points ∼73% -27%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
74279 Points ∼72% -27%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
14249 Points ∼100% +69%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
11770 Points ∼83% +40%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9933 Points ∼70% +18%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
9159 Points ∼64% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=61)
9064 Points ∼64% +8%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8415 Points ∼59%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
6820 Points ∼48% -19%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
48518 Points ∼100% +54%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43231 Points ∼89% +37%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
40244 Points ∼83% +28%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
37500 Points ∼77% +19%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31516 Points ∼65%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=61)
27881 Points ∼57% -12%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
15001 Points ∼31% -52%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
144360 MB/s ∼100% +139%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
118674 MB/s ∼82% +96%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
90741 MB/s ∼63% +50%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=61)
84959 MB/s ∼59% +41%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
73420 MB/s ∼51% +22%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
60410 MB/s ∼42%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
38553 MB/s ∼27% -36%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
1163 MB/s ∼100% +44%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=61)
972 MB/s ∼84% +20%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
820 MB/s ∼71% +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
808 MB/s ∼69%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
772 MB/s ∼66% -4%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
636 MB/s ∼55% -21%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
590 MB/s ∼51% -27%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9692 KRay/s ∼100% +43%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
7634 KRay/s ∼79% +12%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
7399 KRay/s ∼76% +9%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6790 KRay/s ∼70%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=61)
5974 KRay/s ∼62% -12%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
5637 KRay/s ∼58% -17%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
3096 KRay/s ∼32% -54%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
35300 MPixel/s ∼100% +79%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=61)
32995 MPixel/s ∼93% +67%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
28998 MPixel/s ∼82% +47%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
27243 MPixel/s ∼77% +38%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
20323 MPixel/s ∼58% +3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
19764 MPixel/s ∼56%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
15107 MPixel/s ∼43% -24%

系统性能

由于更快的第12代英特尔CPU和PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,PCMark的结果比许多其他旧的或预算的游戏笔记本要高。尽管如此,它仍然落后于配备更快的RTX 3060 GPU的笔记本电脑,如联想Legion 5 15。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
8156 Points ∼100% +18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6918 Points ∼85%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
6908 Points ∼85% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6623 - 7075, n=5)
6823 Points ∼84% -1%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Radeon RX 5500M, R5 5600H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6228 Points ∼76% -10%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
6098 Points ∼75% -12%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5766 Points ∼71% -17%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
11318 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
10533 Points ∼93% +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10401 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9540 - 10970, n=5)
10305 Points ∼91% -1%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Radeon RX 5500M, R5 5600H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
9752 Points ∼86% -6%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
9631 Points ∼85% -7%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8934 Points ∼79% -14%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
10362 Points ∼100% +14%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
9233 Points ∼89% +2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9053 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8530 - 9555, n=5)
9050 Points ∼87% 0%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Radeon RX 5500M, R5 5600H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8811 Points ∼85% -3%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
8625 Points ∼83% -5%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7386 Points ∼71% -18%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
12554 Points ∼100% +32%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9542 Points ∼76%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8855 - 9542, n=5)
9253 Points ∼74% -3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
9198 Points ∼73% -4%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
7887 Points ∼63% -17%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Radeon RX 5500M, R5 5600H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7632 Points ∼61% -20%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
7408 Points ∼59% -22%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
2017 Points ∼100% +22%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1808 Points ∼90% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1654 - 1872, n=5)
1721 Points ∼85% +4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1656 Points ∼82%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
1958 Points ∼100% +23%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1738 Points ∼89% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1595 - 1792, n=5)
1666 Points ∼85% +4%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1595 Points ∼81%
CrossMark / Creativity
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
2017 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1909 Points ∼95% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1699 - 1993, n=5)
1832 Points ∼91% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1826 Points ∼91%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
2207 Points ∼100% +60%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1724 Points ∼78% +25%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1383 - 1768, n=5)
1576 Points ∼71% +14%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1383 Points ∼63%
PCMark 10 Score
6918 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=61)
53737 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
51652 MB/s ∼96% +23%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
46470 MB/s ∼86% +11%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
42141 MB/s ∼78% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
42004 MB/s ∼78%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
40055 MB/s ∼75% -5%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
38595 MB/s ∼72% -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
60298 MB/s ∼100% +28%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=61)
57183 MB/s ∼95% +22%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
49621 MB/s ∼82% +6%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
47412 MB/s ∼79% +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
46966 MB/s ∼78%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
46452 MB/s ∼77% -1%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
43850 MB/s ∼73% -7%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
59356 MB/s ∼100% +33%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=61)
54607 MB/s ∼92% +22%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
50882 MB/s ∼86% +14%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
45622 MB/s ∼77% +2%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
44756 MB/s ∼75%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
36667 MB/s ∼62% -18%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
34820 MB/s ∼59% -22%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
95.9 ns * ∼100% -22%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
83.2 ns * ∼87% -6%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
78.7 ns * ∼82%
Dell G15 5515
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
78.3 ns * ∼82% +1%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M
76.6 ns * ∼80% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=61)
75.1 ns * ∼78% +5%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel Core i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下,4K视频播放是完美的,没有掉帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1554.9 μs * ∼100%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Radeon RX 5500M, R5 5600H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1144.4 μs * ∼74% +26%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1077.6 μs * ∼69% +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H
896.7 μs * ∼58% +42%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
776 μs * ∼50% +50%
Dell G15 5515
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
648 μs * ∼42% +58%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器

我们的测试装置包括一个快速 三星PM9A1PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘,连续读取和写入速度分别高达6900 MB/s和5000 MB/s。然而,正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环测试结果所示,性能在大约5分钟的压力后会出现节流。虽然零节流是最好的,但延迟的性能损失不太可能影响用户体验。

AS SSD
AS SSD
CDM 8
CDM 8
有空间可以放置第二块M.2 2280固态硬盘,但惠普已经取消了这一功能,可能是为了保持低成本,鼓励用户购买更昂贵的Omen 15。
有空间可以放置第二块M.2 2280固态硬盘,但惠普已经取消了这一功能,可能是为了保持低成本,鼓励用户购买更昂贵的Omen 15。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6781 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4993 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 429.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 347 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3779 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2745 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 70.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 124.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
90.9 pt ∼91%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
62.5 pt ∼63%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
54.5 pt ∼55%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
43.5 pt ∼44%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
39.1 pt ∼39%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
27.3 pt ∼27%
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
5217 (5203.87min - 5216.88max) MB/s ∼100% +41%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3702 (3637.58min - 3701.54max) MB/s ∼71%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
2022 (1997.95min - 2021.5max) MB/s ∼39% -45%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2017 (1984.34min - 2017.25max) MB/s ∼39% -46%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1873 (1707.98min - 1872.94max) MB/s ∼36% -49%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1291 (1255.35min - 1291.43max) MB/s ∼25% -65%
seq write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
4897 (3448.11min - 4896.85max) MB/s ∼100% +57%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3113 (2869.67min - 3113.43max) MB/s ∼64%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2422 (2382.84min - 2422max) MB/s ∼49% -22%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1663 (89.94min - 1663.22max) MB/s ∼34% -47%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1620 (1315.87min - 1620.14max) MB/s ∼33% -48%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
980 (973.35min - 979.79max) MB/s ∼20% -69%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
7087 (5653.31min - 7087.33max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6719 (5699.43min - 6719.47max) MB/s ∼95%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2971 (2662.21min - 2971.11max) MB/s ∼42% -56%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2884 (2356.88min - 2883.79max) MB/s ∼41% -57%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
2268 (2042.21min - 2267.99max) MB/s ∼32% -66%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1983 (1223.9min - 1983.26max) MB/s ∼28% -70%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4857 (4829.1min - 4856.73max) MB/s ∼100%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2719 (2626.26min - 2719.17max) MB/s ∼56% -44%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1745 (1716.18min - 1745.18max) MB/s ∼36% -64%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1669 (1647.46min - 1668.51max) MB/s ∼34% -66%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
1498 (1232.29min - 1498.21max) MB/s ∼31% -69%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
978 (974.19min - 977.55max) MB/s ∼20% -80%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
83.5 (81.68min - 83.51max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
80.9 (75.58min - 80.91max) MB/s ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
74.8 (74.7min - 74.8max) MB/s ∼90% -8%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
54.3 (53.88min - 54.34max) MB/s ∼65% -33%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
43.5 (43.27min - 43.5max) MB/s ∼52% -46%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
41.9 (40.83min - 41.93max) MB/s ∼50% -48%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
369 (353.26min - 369.49max) MB/s ∼100% +186%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
236 (133.37min - 235.74max) MB/s ∼64% +83%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
198 (172.5min - 197.93max) MB/s ∼54% +53%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
154.2 (152.73min - 154.18max) MB/s ∼42% +19%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
129.2 (127.83min - 129.15max) MB/s ∼35%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
104 (103.47min - 103.94max) MB/s ∼28% -20%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
4443 (4409.57min - 4442.75max) MB/s ∼100% +392%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1911 (1874.27min - 1911.14max) MB/s ∼43% +112%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1362 (1077.22min - 1361.69max) MB/s ∼31% +51%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
903 (865.18min - 903.16max) MB/s ∼20%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
476 (474.31min - 475.67max) MB/s ∼11% -47%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
313 (302.06min - 312.63max) MB/s ∼7% -65%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
2050 (1045.7min - 2049.6max) MB/s ∼100% +451%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1613 (652.19min - 1612.82max) MB/s ∼79% +334%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1180 (174.62min - 1179.96max) MB/s ∼58% +217%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1078 (929.48min - 1077.95max) MB/s ∼53% +190%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
978 (971.42min - 978.34max) MB/s ∼48% +163%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
372 (363.89min - 371.6max) MB/s ∼18%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
9510 Points ∼100% +80%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5285 Points ∼56%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
5075 Points ∼53% -4%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
3522 Points ∼37% -33%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
2535 Points ∼27% -52%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1923 Points ∼20% -64%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
3428 Points ∼100% +159%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1738 Points ∼51% +31%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1566 Points ∼46% +18%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1322 Points ∼39%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
801 Points ∼23% -39%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
528 Points ∼15% -60%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
4522 Points ∼100% +35%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3361 Points ∼74%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2449 Points ∼54% -27%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1358 Points ∼30% -60%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1192 Points ∼26% -65%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1151 Points ∼25% -66%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
5844.9 MB/s ∼100% +42%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4111.85 MB/s ∼70%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
2735.98 MB/s ∼47% -33%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
2555 MB/s ∼44% -38%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2255 MB/s ∼39% -45%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1759.09 MB/s ∼30% -57%
Seq Write
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2232.79 MB/s ∼100%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2129 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
2038.42 MB/s ∼91% -9%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1791 MB/s ∼80% -20%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1485.81 MB/s ∼67% -33%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
933.61 MB/s ∼42% -58%
4K Read
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
77.91 MB/s ∼100% +8%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
71.99 MB/s ∼92% 0%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
71.91 MB/s ∼92%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
49.5 MB/s ∼64% -31%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
40.72 MB/s ∼52% -43%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
37.8 MB/s ∼49% -47%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
310.54 MB/s ∼100% +83%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
204.37 MB/s ∼66% +20%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
175.1 MB/s ∼56% +3%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
169.96 MB/s ∼55%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
129.37 MB/s ∼42% -24%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
86.7 MB/s ∼28% -49%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
2771.98 MB/s ∼100% +231%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
1463 MB/s ∼53% +74%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
1273 MB/s ∼46% +52%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
838.49 MB/s ∼30%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
449.02 MB/s ∼16% -46%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
311.72 MB/s ∼11% -63%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
4007.67 MB/s ∼100% +35%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2967.73 MB/s ∼74%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
2061 MB/s ∼51% -31%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
1005.05 MB/s ∼25% -66%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
928.21 MB/s ∼23% -69%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
926 MB/s ∼23% -69%
Access Time Read
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.164 ms * ∼100% -257%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
0.163 ms * ∼99% -254%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
0.138 ms * ∼84% -200%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
0.074 ms * ∼45% -61%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.046 ms * ∼28%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
0.037 ms * ∼23% +20%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
0.099 ms * ∼100% -34%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
0.084 ms * ∼85% -14%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.074 ms * ∼75%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
 
0.053 ms * ∼54% +28%
Dell G15 5515
Samsung PM991a MZ9LQ512HBLU-00BD1
0.044 ms * ∼44% +41%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
0.022 ms * ∼22% +70%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

033567010051340167520102345268030153350368540204355469050255360569560306365Tooltip
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr: Ø6108 (4190.96-6688.07)

GPU性能 - 75 W TGP

图形性能可与较早的 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti移动RTX 2060同时比标准的 移动RTX 3050.RTX 3050系列一直有些令人失望,因为竞争者是 Radeon RX 6600M售价大致相同,但性能快50%。即便如此,大多数游戏仍然可以在原生1080p分辨率下播放,包括赛博朋克2077

我们惊讶地看到,尽管我们的系统内存只有8GB,但大多数游戏仍然可以运行得非常好。除了像《赛博朋克2077》这样要求非常高的游戏,如果在Ultra设置下,性能可能会慢10%左右外,平均帧率是我们期望的,与其他具有相同GPU的笔记本电脑相比是如此。

高级图形功能,如Optimus 2.0、集成G-Sync或MUX,在这台预算机上不被支持。没有 GeForce RTX 3060或更高的选项,也没有。

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Fire Strike (提升关闭)
Fire Strike (提升关闭)
Fire Strike (提升上)
Fire Strike (提升上)
Fire Strike 超强
Fire Strike 超强
速度之道
速度之道
Time Spy
Time Spy
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
34993 Points ∼100% +139%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
31096 Points ∼89% +113%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
30521 Points ∼87% +109%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
22257 Points ∼64% +52%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
21876 Points ∼63% +50%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
15499 Points ∼44% +6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
14746 Points ∼42% +1%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14628 Points ∼42%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
13362 Points ∼38% -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7917 - 15611, n=26)
13090 Points ∼37% -11%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
11621 Points ∼33% -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
12253 Points ∼100% +124%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
11938 Points ∼97% +118%
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY
AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11313 Points ∼92% +106%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9145 Points ∼75% +67%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7200 Points ∼59% +31%
HP Omen 15-en0375ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
5819 Points ∼47% +6%
HP Omen 15-ek0456ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-10300H
5735 Points ∼47% +5%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
5481 Points ∼45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
  (3744 - 6122, n=27)
5177 Points ∼42% -6%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H
4995 Points ∼41% -9%
MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US
AMD Radeon RX 5500M, AMD Ryzen 5 5600H
3875 Points ∼32% -29%
2560x1440 Time Spy CPU
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800HX
14286 Points ∼100% +31%
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
14196 Points ∼99% +31%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
13252 Points ∼93% +22%
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10868 Points ∼76%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12650H