Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar惠普Victus 15笔记本电脑回顾。昂贵的预算游戏玩家
惠普Victus系列由经济型游戏笔记本组成，与制造商的高端Omen系列形成对比。因此，Victus模型具有较低的规格和有限的可配置选项，以保持低价格和竞争力。到目前为止，该系列有两个型号。15.6英寸的Victus 15和16.1英寸的 胜利者16.
我们的测试单元是Victus 15，配备了英特尔第12代酷睿i7-12700H处理器，GeForce RTX 3050 Ti，144 Hz 1080p IPS显示屏，以及仅8GB内存，零售价约为1200至1300美元。更少的SKU有酷睿i7-12650H、AMD Ryzen 7 5800H、RTX 3050或60 Hz 1080p显示屏，价格低几百美元，但我们的CPU和GPU配置是该机型的最高配置。
Victus 15的竞争对手包括其他入门级15.6英寸游戏笔记本电脑，如 戴尔G5 15, 联想IdeaPad Gaming 3, 微星GF或 GP系列, 或 华硕TUF系列.
更多惠普评论。
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Victus 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, Memory: 1468 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, 527.56, Optimus
Memory
8 GB
, Micron DDR4-3200, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN1521, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, 512 GB
Weight
2.331 kg, Power Supply: 641 g
Price
1300 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 % | 01/2023 | HP Victus 15 fa0020nr i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.8 % | HP Omen 15-en0375ng R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 82.7 % | 10/2021 | Dell G15 5515 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.9 % | 08/2022 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 78.2 % | 04/2022 | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M | 2.3 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.5 % | 11/2022 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 19.99 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例 - 预算中的好看的东西
该系统既大又重，比更昂贵的 Omen 15尽管Victus 15是一台较慢的笔记本电脑。值得庆幸的是，它不像竞争对手戴尔G15那样笨重，但它仍然偏重于2.3公斤。华硕 华硕TUF Dash F15 相比之下要轻几百克。
连接性 - 不支持Thunderbolt
除了一个USB-A端口，Omen 15上的所有端口都出现在Victus 15上。这里不支持Thunderbolt，可能是为了节省成本。
可以说，端口定位比戴尔G15或联想G15上的更好。 联想Legion 5 15因为惠普的后部没有端口，更容易接触到。
SD卡阅读器
我们很惊讶地看到一个集成的SD卡读卡器，因为许多经济型游戏笔记本电脑都省略了它。传输速度仅相当于 读取器的一半。或 Razer Blade但它比没有读卡器要好。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
沟通
包括一个联发科MT7921，用于2x2 Wi-Fi 6和蓝牙5.2连接。英特尔AX211是为Wi-Fi 6E提供的额外费用。在我们的测试中，尽管性能落后于其他大多数采用英特尔AX解决方案的笔记本电脑，但传输率还是很稳定。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø816 (759-856)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1122 (746-1279)
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø810 (699-859)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1128 (593-1213)
网络摄像头
网络摄像头是基本的100万像素传感器，没有红外或甚至隐私快门。惠普拥有一些最好的笔记本电脑网络摄像头，正如在最新的Spectre上看到的那样。 最新的Spectre和 EliteBook模型因此，我们的Victus上模糊的网络摄像头显然是一种削减成本的措施。
8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
11 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
14 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
维护
底部面板由七颗飞利浦螺钉固定，相对来说比较容易维修。用户可以直接访问单个M.2 PCIe4 x4 2280插槽，可拆卸的WLAN模块和2个SODIMM插槽。竞争对手华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC最多支持两个M.2固态硬盘，而我们的惠普只能支持一个。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外，零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买，通常有一年的制造商有限保修。
输入设备 - 宽大的键盘和点击板
键盘
更多的游戏笔记本开始整合数字键盘，Victus 15也不例外。我们特别欣赏的是，与戴尔G15或华硕TUF Dash F15上狭窄的数字键盘不同，数字键盘不比主要的QWERTY键窄。
在Victus上，打字时的按键反馈略微柔和，因此更加安静。然而，回车键和退格键有点太软，可以从更坚定的反馈中受益。
单区白色背光是照亮所有按键和符号的标准配置，而其他大多数游戏笔记本都有RGB选项。这里甚至没有背光亮度设置--要么开，要么关，中间没有任何设置。
触摸板
宽大的点击板只是比Legion 5 15上的点击板稍大一些（12.5 x 8厘米对12.5 x 7.5厘米）。在塑料表面上的牵引力很平稳，只有在较慢的速度下才有一点粘性，以便更准确地输入。集成的按键也很有弹性，不会太松弛。
点击板的两个最大缺点是按下时的反馈声很大，而且总体上容易积聚指纹。预计在很短的时间内，掌托、按键和点击板就会显得光亮而油腻。
显示屏 - 仅1080p
有以下四种显示方式可供选择。
- 1920 x 1080, 60 Hz, 250 nits, TN
- 1920 x 1080，60 Hz，250尼特，IPS
- 1920 x 1080，144赫兹，250尼特，IPS
- 1920 x 1080，60赫兹，300尼特，IPS
所有选项都是哑光的，没有OLED或更高分辨率的面板可供选择。我们的具体评测单位配备了上述加粗选项，以获得更流畅的用户体验，但糟糕的色彩和平均响应时间是将Victus 15与拥有更好显示屏的更昂贵的游戏笔记本区分开来的主要因素。胜利者 Omen 16系列例如，它提供了完整的sRGB覆盖率和更快的响应时间。
对比度对于经济型游戏笔记本来说至少是非常好的，约为1500:1。即便如此，由于面板的色域有限，颜色和内容并不突出。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN1521
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 284.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 262.1 cd/m² Minimum: 14.82 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 284.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1672:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.52 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.55
ΔE Greyscale 4.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
43.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr CMN1521, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Omen 15-en0375ng BOE0852, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell G15 5515 BOE092A, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB CSOT MNF601CA1-3, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | -8% | 94% | 0% | 62% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42 | 39.12 -7% | 39.1 -7% | 95.8 128% | 42.1 0% | 69.1 65% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.7 | 57.6 -8% | 56.9 -9% | 99.9 59% | 62.8 0% | 99.5 59% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.4 | 40.42 -7% | 40.4 -7% | 85.1 96% | 43.6 0% | 70 61% |
| Response Times | 19% | 33% | 69% | 22% | 57% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 30.4 ? 14% | 25.2 ? 28% | 8.4 ? 76% | 25.6 ? 27% | 14.8 ? 58% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 20.8 ? 24% | 16.8 ? 38% | 10.4 ? 62% | 22.8 ? 16% | 12 ? 56% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? | ||||
| Screen | -31% | -43% | -9% | -37% | -3% | |
| Brightness middle | 284.3 | 297 4% | 278 -2% | 354.2 25% | 265.1 -7% | 363.5 28% |
| Brightness | 262 | 275 5% | 262 0% | 330 26% | 245 -6% | 350 34% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 88 1% | 83 -5% | 88 1% | 87 0% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.33 -94% | 0.36 -112% | 0.32 -88% | 0.35 -106% | 0.39 -129% |
| Contrast | 1672 | 900 -46% | 772 -54% | 1107 -34% | 757 -55% | 932 -44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.52 | 4.54 -0% | 5.74 -27% | 4.06 10% | 4.68 -4% | 3.68 19% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.67 | 18.92 -1% | 19.63 -5% | 8.81 53% | 19.96 -7% | 8.92 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.55 | 4.66 -201% | 4.7 -203% | 3.7 -139% | 0.53 66% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.1 | 2.1 49% | 3.1 24% | 6.7 -63% | 4.5 -10% | 6.5 -59% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.066 106% | 2.011 109% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
| CCT | 6529 100% | 6291 103% | 6207 105% | 6731 97% | 6632 98% | 5995 108% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-19% | -6% /
-24% | 51% /
27% | -5% /
-21% | 39% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
该显示器在开箱时没有经过校准，其平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别高达4.1和4.52。自己校准面板会使这些值分别降至0.6和1.55，但由于上述狭窄的sRGB覆盖范围，较高的饱和度水平仍然非常不准确。我们下面的Calman屏幕截图显示，特别是蓝色和洋红色的颜色比其他颜色更不准确。
我们建议应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件，这可以帮助提高较低饱和度水平的色彩准确性。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18925 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
哑光面板的亮度不够，无法在户外舒适地观看。眩光是永远存在的，颜色也因此而变得模糊不清。你必须投资于价格较高的游戏笔记本电脑，其显示屏更亮，如 Razer Blade 15在户外更容易看到。
性能 - 英特尔Alder Lake-H第12代产品
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们通过Windows和预装的Omen Gaming Hub软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式。我们还确保启用HP Boost模式和Nvidia GPU，如下面的截图所示。事实上，在多个菜单下隐藏着许多单独的电源设置，特别是当你在较低和较高的性能水平之间不断切换时，会令人感到沮丧。
处理器 - 有限的涡轮增压
CPU性能很好，但性能的可持续性可以更好。如下图所示，在循环运行CineBench R15 xT时，性能会下降多达28%。即使在性能模式下运行系统并激活HP Boost，也会出现这种下降，这在游戏笔记本上看到是令人失望的。这 联想Legion 5 15笔记本，它配备了相同的 酷睿i7-12700HCPU，可以提供46%的多线程性能，因为它的CPU几乎没有那么严重的节流。
选择价格较低的 AMD Ryzen 5800H与我们的酷睿i7-12700H相比，Victus 15的SKU将导致约20%至25%的性能下降。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1980 (1935.64-2695.78)
Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2876 (2825.86-2915.88)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2360 (2296.08-2730.75)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2656 (2614.89-2735.42)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4032 - 19330, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (778 - 1826, n=61) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1576 - 7407, n=62) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (300 - 704, n=62) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1379 - 2916, n=68) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (113 - 263, n=63) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2743 - 5972, n=61) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (4.67 - 21.8, n=62) | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (34.2 - 95.3, n=61) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (0.4441 - 1.052, n=61) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Razer Blade 17 (i7-12800H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (2585 - 17957, n=61) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12439 - 90760, n=61) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (833 - 4242, n=61) | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (57923 - 103202, n=61) | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (3249 - 9939, n=61) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (7135 - 44760, n=61) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (31839 - 144360, n=61) | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (305 - 1171, n=61) | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (1437 - 9692, n=61) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (12863 - 52207, n=61) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
系统性能
由于更快的第12代英特尔CPU和PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘，PCMark的结果比许多其他旧的或预算的游戏笔记本要高。尽管如此，它仍然落后于配备更快的RTX 3060 GPU的笔记本电脑，如联想Legion 5 15。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (6623 - 7075, n=5) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (9540 - 10970, n=5) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8530 - 9555, n=5) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (8855 - 9542, n=5) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1654 - 1872, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1595 - 1792, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1699 - 1993, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (1383 - 1768, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6918 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25615 - 80511, n=61) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (25586 - 79442, n=61) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (23679 - 88660, n=61) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12700H (76.2 - 133.9, n=61) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下，4K视频播放是完美的，没有掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器
我们的测试装置包括一个快速 三星PM9A1PCIe4 x4 NVMe固态硬盘，连续读取和写入速度分别高达6900 MB/s和5000 MB/s。然而，正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环测试结果所示，性能在大约5分钟的压力后会出现节流。虽然零节流是最好的，但延迟的性能损失不太可能影响用户体验。
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6781 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4993 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
429.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
347 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3779 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2745 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
70.12 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
124.2 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
HP Victus 15 fa0020nr: Ø6108 (4190.96-6688.07)
GPU性能 - 75 W TGP
图形性能可与较早的 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti或 移动RTX 2060同时比标准的 移动RTX 3050.RTX 3050系列一直有些令人失望，因为竞争者是 Radeon RX 6600M售价大致相同，但性能快50%。即便如此，大多数游戏仍然可以在原生1080p分辨率下播放，包括赛博朋克2077。
我们惊讶地看到，尽管我们的系统内存只有8GB，但大多数游戏仍然可以运行得非常好。除了像《赛博朋克2077》这样要求非常高的游戏，如果在Ultra设置下，性能可能会慢10%左右外，平均帧率是我们期望的，与其他具有相同GPU的笔记本电脑相比是如此。
高级图形功能，如Optimus 2.0、集成G-Sync或MUX，在这台预算机上不被支持。没有 GeForce RTX 3060或更高的选项，也没有。
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (7917 - 15611, n=26) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus ROG Strix G15 G513QY | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
| HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
| HP Omen 15-ek0456ng | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU (3744 - 6122, n=27) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy CPU | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IAH7H 82RB | |
| Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
| HP Victus 15 fa0020nr | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |