Android 配备 5G 和大量内存的中端最佳商务平板电脑 - 联想 Tab K12 评测

Name: Lenovo Tab K12
Brand: Lenovo

非常适合商务用途。

联想 Tab K12 是一款 12 英寸商务平板电脑，配备 5G、12 GB 内存和充电器，对个人用户来说也很有趣。我们将向您展示这款平板电脑的显示屏、电池、GPS 和软件到底有多出色，以及令人失望的地方。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 03/29/2026 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android ARM Tablet

联想 Tab K12 的评价

乍一看，联想 Tab K12 和联想 Idea Tab Plus 相似得令人困惑。然而，仔细观察就会发现它们在功能、供货范围和其他细节上的不同：Tab K12 只提供一年保修，这对商务设备来说很正常。但对于欧盟的个人用户，经销商保修期仍为 24 个月。

Tab K12 还附带一个充电器。软件没有一些预装的臃肿软件，而且针对公司的集中管理进行了更好的优化。在中欧，你主要得到的版本与 5G，我们批评没有可用的想法 Tab 加。另一方面，你必须在交付范围内没有手写笔，但你也得到 12 GB 的 RAM 作为回报。

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

就其本身而言，联想 Tab K12 是一款令人信服的 12 英寸平板电脑，铝制外壳相对较轻，GPS 定位精确。充电速度相当快，电池续航时间也令人信服。此外，它还配备了无 PWM 显示屏和出色的扬声器。

不过，蹩脚的 WLAN 功能和只能达到及格水平的性能以及没有指纹传感器都令人讨厌。

Pros

+ 可使用笔输入

+ 轻质外壳

+ 精确的 GPS

+ 提供 5G 版本

+ 无 PWM 闪烁

+ 充电快，运行时间长

+ 完整的扬声器音效

Cons

- 仅限 4 年更新

- 仅支持 WiFi 5

- 无指纹传感器

- 性能一般

- 仍有臃肿软件

- 供货范围不包括手写笔

价格和供应情况

联想 Tab K12 在amazon.de有售，价格约为 420 欧元（约合 485 美元）。

不过，其他在线零售商的售价也较低，约为 350 欧元（约合 404 美元）起。

Bestpreis 346 € lapstars

Lenovo Tab K12 TB361ZU, Luna Grey, 12GB RAM, 256GB Flash, 5G (ZAGG0085SE)

2. 355 € notebookkontor.de
3. 368 € Alternate
4. 378 € Alternate.at

联想 Tab K12 的评价
规格
外壳 - 令人印象深刻的轻质铝机箱
功能 - 带有大量内存的平板电脑
软件 - 少一点臃肿的软件
通信与全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 速度缓慢，令人失望
照相机 - 简单图片
配件 - 可使用笔输入
输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器丢失
显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 屏幕
性能 - 越多越好
排放--几乎没有变暖
电池寿命 - 快速充电，长时间运行
Notebookcheck 总体评分
可比较的替代品

联想 Tab K12 并非完全默默无闻：联想的 Idea Tab Plus就是近亲。不过，Tab K12 的目标是通过特殊的商务功能来加分，它配备了电源装置、更大的内存，甚至可以根据要求提供 5G。不过，你也必须忍受较短的保修期。

我们将对这款商务版 Tab K12 进行仔细研究，看看是否值得投资。

规格

Lenovo Tab K12 (Tab K Series)

Processor

Mediatek Dimensity 6400 8c/8t, 2 x 2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A76, 6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G57 MP2

Memory

12 GB

Display

12.10 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 249 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 90 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB

, 228 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, hall

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B5/B8), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B71), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n71/n75/n77/n78), LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.55 x 278.8 x 181.05

Battery

10200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 45 Watt wired charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 13 MPix
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4 speakers with Dolby Atmos support, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, IP52 certified, fanless

Weight

530 g

Price

349 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 令人印象深刻的轻质铝机箱

Tab K12 的铝制机身重 530 克（约合 1.2 磅），就其尺寸而言非常轻巧，但看起来仍然很结实，几乎无法扭动。

机壳上似乎印有高质量的天线，但由于背面还有一条宽塑料条，我们怀疑天线就藏在塑料条后面，其他部分只是装饰。

7 毫米（约 0.3 英寸）的显示屏边缘相当纤薄，但平板电脑仍然可以可靠地握持和操作。

该平板电脑具有 IP52 防护等级，可防止灰尘和溅水，因此不应浸入水中。颜色只是略带蓝灰色。

尺寸比较

Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Lenovo Tab K12 Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro DIN A4 ❌

功能 - 带有大量内存的平板电脑

我们的测试设备配备 12GB 内存和 256GB 大容量存储。我们还配备了 5G 模块，但也有存储容量更小和仅 WLAN 的型号。种类繁多表明，企业客户可以很好地进行配置。

遗憾的是，USB 端口只能按照 USB 2.0 标准传输数据，不能输出图像信号。底部的三个 Pogo 引脚可以连接键盘盖。

microSD 读卡器

平板电脑最多可使用 2 TB 存储卡。在我们使用 Angelbird V60 参考卡进行的测试中，数据传输速率高于平均水平。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (Angelbird V60)	47.9 MB/s +2%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (Angelbird V60)	46.8 MB/s
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 (Angelbird V60)	40.5 MB/s -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	38.25 MB/s -18%
Average of class Tablet (10.2 - 57.4, n=46, last 2 years)	36.8 MB/s -21%

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

Lenovo Tab K12; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.8-48.5)

Lenovo Tab K12; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (52.9-82.4)

软件 - 少一点臃肿的软件

我们的测试设备配备了Android 16 和 2025 年 11 月起的安全更新，因此联想在提供及时更新方面似乎做得不多。在Android 17 之前应该会有新的操作系统，在 2029 年 9 月 1 日之前应该会有安全更新。对于这个价位的平板电脑来说，这其实还算可以，但欧盟实际上规定了更长的更新时间。

特殊模式允许在窗口或分屏视图中打开应用程序。如果公司有许多平板电脑在使用，还可以改进管理选项。联想还减少了预装的臃肿软件，以加快设置速度。尽管如此，有些应用程序仍然是预装的，这在专业环境中是难以理解的。

可持续性

包装不含塑料，制造商通常会在几个月后提供维修说明和备件。

没有关于二氧化碳排放量或所用材料的信息。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 速度缓慢，令人失望

在 Wi-Fi 环境中，它的速度并不快；Wi-Fi 5 已是最好的了。使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture AXE11000，数据传输速率达到了预期水平，而且相当稳定，但同类平板电脑有时要快得多。

路由器安装了 5G 模块。它提供的频率范围很广，因此平板电脑可以在许多国家使用移动互联网。在我们的测试中，随机测试的接收质量大多不错。

Networking
Lenovo Tab K12 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	274 (min: 238) MBit/s ∼30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	338 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼41%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	291 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼32%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	327 (min: 216) MBit/s ∼39%
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	995 (min: 822) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1590 (min: 1429) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	918 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	831 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1655 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1222 (min: 1067) MBit/s ∼77%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	337 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	330 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	330 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼20%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	291 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼18%
Average of class Tablet
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	588 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	691 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1192 (min: 330) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1404 (min: 291) MBit/s ∼88%

Lenovo Tab K12; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø274 (238-295)

Lenovo Tab K12; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø338 (291-361)

除了 GPS、GLONASS 和伽利略系统外，SBAS 系统也能提供更精确的卫星定位。

我们的自行车之旅显示，尽管在道路和小径上的定位并不完全准确，但定位效果良好。该平板电脑可用于导航，没有任何重大限制。

照相机 - 简单图片

主摄像头分辨率为 1300 万像素，提供自动对焦功能，而前置摄像头为 800 万像素，只能进行固定对焦。

图像质量可以接受，但真正的摄影发烧友会很快回到智能手机上。

您还可以使用主摄像头扫描文件，使用前置摄像头进行视频会议。两者都能很好地工作，但必须确保有足够的光线。

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plant Main camera environment Main camera Low Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件 - 可使用笔输入

包装中包括一个 45 瓦的充电器和一根 USB 数据线，以及一个用于打开卡槽的 SIM 卡工具。

您必须单独购买触控笔；例如，联想提供的带蓝牙功能的 Tab Pen Plus 售价约为 59 欧元（约合 68 美元）。键盘盖可从联想或第三方供应商处购买，有多种款式。

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器丢失

触摸屏反应迅速，屏幕的 90 Hz 帧速率意味着输入也能很快完成。

没有指纹传感器，只能使用 2D 面部识别进行生物解锁。这种方式虽然足够可靠，但安全性较差。因此，最好不要在平板电脑上保存商业机密。

我们在对 Idea Tab Plus 的评测中详细介绍了笔输入的感觉。 Idea Tab Plus.

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 屏幕

幸运的是，Tab K12 的 IPS 屏幕不会出现 PWM 闪烁，因此也适合较为敏感的人群使用。分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素，像素密度高，显示效果细腻。

在明亮的环境光线下，屏幕亮度约为 630 cd/m²。在较小的表面上，这一数值会略有增加。该平板电脑可在户外使用，但在阳光直射下很难看到屏幕上的任何内容。

色彩显示偶尔会有些不准确，整体略微偏绿。


623 cd/m²	624 cd/m²	621 cd/m²
614 cd/m²	635 cd/m²	619 cd/m²
630 cd/m²	623 cd/m²	624 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 635 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 623.7 cd/m² Minimum: 3.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 635 cd/m²
Contrast: 1296:1 (Black: 0.49 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.21 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.75}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
134.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.197
CCT: 6304 K

	Lenovo Tab K12 IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"	Lenovo Idea Tab Plus IPS, 2560x1600, 12.1"	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro IPS, 2944x1840, 12.7"	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro TFT-LCD, 2560x1600, 12.1"
Screen		18%	-5%	32%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	635	633 0%	413 -35%	582 -8%
Brightness (cd/m²)	624	622 0%	394 -37%	553 -11%
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	95 -2%	89 -8%	87 -10%
Black Level * (cd/m²)	0.49	0.54 -10%	0.45 8%	0.33 33%
Contrast (:1)	1296	1172 -10%	918 -29%	1764 36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.21	1.81 57%	2.85 32%	0.8 81%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.71	2.98 61%	6.16 20%	2.2 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.8	2.5 48%	4.3 10%	1.6 67%
Gamma	2.197 ^100%	1.934 ^114%	2.239 ^98%	2.21 ^100%
CCT	6304 ^103%	6853 ^95%	7476 ^87%	6294 ^103%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	664 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	537 cd/m² -19%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	628 cd/m²
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	400 cd/m² -36%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7962 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
24.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14.2 ms rise
24.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.2 ms rise
21.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 33 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms).

性能 - 越多越好

联发科联发科 Dimensity 6400联发科 Dimensity 6400 的性能足以满足中端市场的需求，但与此同时，正如我们的基准比较所示，在这个价格范围内，你也可以买到性能更强的平板电脑。此外，SoC 并不总是能保证真正的流畅运行。

在图形性能方面，你不应该指望在最高设置下流畅地玩要求苛刻的游戏。上网冲浪通常会快速流畅。内存速度不是很快，但数据传输足够快。

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (323 - 4128, n=93, last 2 years)	1557 Points +95%
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1423 Points +78%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	1241 Points +56%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	798 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (761 - 814, n=5)	788 Points -1%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	761 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (1104 - 16544, n=93, last 2 years)	4955 Points +145%
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	4652 Points +130%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	3262 Points +61%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	2025 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (1983 - 2072, n=5)	2021 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	2002 Points -1%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (235067 - 3475590, n=64, last 2 years)	1301213 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	759560 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (430344 - 468240, n=2)	449292 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	430344 Points

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	20688 Points +69%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	14222 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet (7084 - 27428, n=68, last 2 years)	13443 Points +10%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	12223 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (12202 - 12223, n=2)	12213 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	12202 Points 0%

CrossMark - Overall
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300, Mali-G615 MP6, 8192	1023 Points +103%
Average of class Tablet (319 - 2155, n=53, last 2 years)	977 Points +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	792 Points +57%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	504 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (502 - 504, n=2)	503 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (195 - 13159, n=61, last 2 years)	6241 Points +99%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	5076 Points +62%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	3140 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	3134 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (3110 - 3140, n=3)	3128 Points 0%
System
Average of class Tablet (904 - 18343, n=61, last 2 years)	9405 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	8102 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	5595 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	5592 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (5353 - 5595, n=3)	5513 Points -1%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (401 - 17963, n=61, last 2 years)	7429 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	5338 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	4972 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	4970 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (4562 - 4972, n=3)	4835 Points -3%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (88 - 55810, n=61, last 2 years)	16599 Points +517%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	10056 Points +274%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (2677 - 3018, n=3)	2795 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	2689 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	2677 Points 0%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 2370, n=61, last 2 years)	1577 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	1526 Points +17%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	1300 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	1297 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (1269 - 1300, n=3)	1289 Points -1%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet (3164 - 76852, n=57, last 2 years)	16756 Points +146%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	8216 Points +20%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	6819 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6803 - 6819, n=2)	6811 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	6803 Points 0%

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (248 - 50153, n=45, last 2 years)	4749 Points +419%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	915 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (910 - 915, n=2)	913 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	910 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	Points -100%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet (166 - 5295, n=36, last 2 years)	610 Points +179%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	246 Points +12%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (218 - 231, n=4)	225 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	219 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	218 Points 0%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet (154 - 41155, n=36, last 2 years)	2755 Points +748%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (322 - 334, n=4)	328 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	325 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	322 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	246 Points -24%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Tablet (88 - 57388, n=36, last 2 years)	3976 Points +1812%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	590 Points +184%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	208 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	205 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (203 - 208, n=4)	205 Points -1%

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Tablet (66.1 - 8305, n=10, last 2 years)	1057 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	111 Points
Score V6
Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 17293, n=31, last 2 years)	3607 Points +1503%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4, Adreno 810, 8192	2013 Points +795%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288	225 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (224 - 225, n=2)	225 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192	224 Points 0%

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2502 Points +645%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	336 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	328 Points -2%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2685 Points +685%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	342 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	339 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1816 Points +50%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1212 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1210 Points 0%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	140 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	138 Points -1%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	139 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	137 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps +129%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	41 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -2%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	135 fps +141%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	56 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	51 fps +104%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	25 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	86 fps +126%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	38 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	33 fps +136%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	64 fps +167%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	24 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +117%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.3 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.1 fps -2%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	36 fps +157%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	14 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps +391%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps +216%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.7 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.6 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps +471%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps +275%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.6 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5.5 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps +307%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	28 fps +208%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.1 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.9 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps +426%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	55 fps +262%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15.2 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	15 fps -1%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14 fps +460%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 4, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	9.3 fps +272%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.5 fps
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2.4 fps -4%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Tablet (35.8 - 395, n=65, last 2 years)	156.7 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 142.0.7444.48)	143.861 Points +51%
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (94.3 - 98.2, n=4)	96.2 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab K12 (Chrome 146)	95.233 Points
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155)	94.343 Points -1%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 790, n=49, last 2 years)	220 runs/min +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 142.0.7444.48)	185 runs/min +110%
Lenovo Tab K12 (Chrome 146)	88 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (87.9 - 88, n=2)	88 runs/min 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155)	87.9 runs/min 0%

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=63, last 2 years)	14.5 runs/min +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 142.0.7444.48)	10.8 runs/min +70%
Lenovo Tab K12 (Chrome 146)	6.35 runs/min
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (6.11 - 6.35, n=2)	6.23 runs/min -2%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155)	6.11 runs/min -4%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 142.0.7444.48)	147 Points +62%
Average of class Tablet (39 - 376, n=66, last 2 years)	144.7 Points +59%
Lenovo Tab K12 (Chrome 146)	91 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (90 - 91, n=2)	90.5 Points -1%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155)	90 Points -1%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 142.0.7444.48)	49622 Points +73%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=85, last 2 years)	46875 Points +63%
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro (Chrome 139)	46855 Points +63%
Lenovo Tab K12 (Chrome 146)	28702 Points
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (28640 - 28702, n=2)	28671 Points 0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155)	28640 Points 0%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=75, last 2 years)	2377 ms * -58%
Lenovo Tab K12 (Chrome 146)	1504.2 ms *
Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400 (1504 - 1504, n=2)	1504 ms * -0%
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus (Chrome 140.0.7339.155)	1503.7 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro (Chrome 142.0.7444.48)	819.1 ms * +46%

* ... smaller is better

	Lenovo Tab K12	Lenovo Idea Tab Plus	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro	Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5		-4%	114%	9%	11%	87%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	602.3	526.82 -13%	2123 252%	983.31 63%	899 ?(482 - 1041, n=63) 49%	1843 ?(126.9 - 4093, n=80, last 2 years) 206%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	601.8	527.26 -12%	1745 190%	915.09 52%	733 ?(369 - 998, n=63) 22%	1442 ?(80.4 - 3773, n=80, last 2 years) 140%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	258.6	271.5 5%	244 -6%	150.42 -42%	225 ?(99.7 - 295, n=63) -13%	256 ?(20.1 - 475, n=80, last 2 years) -1%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	289.9	304.01 5%	352 21%	180.77 -38%	249 ?(99.2 - 390, n=63) -14%	293 ?(9.1 - 989, n=80, last 2 years) 1%

排放--几乎没有变暖

温度

平板电脑通常会保持相当低的温度，即使在长时间负载后也是如此。

压力测试也显示 SoC 没有出现节流现象。

Max. Load

Idle


30.1 °C	34.2 °C	29.1 °C
28.8 °C	28.9 °C	28.6 °C
28.7 °C	28.5 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 34.2 °C
Average: 29.4 °C


27.8 °C	34.5 °C	33.9 °C
27.2 °C	27.5 °C	29.7 °C
27.1 °C	27.2 °C	28.8 °C

Maximum: 34.5 °C
Average: 29.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.6 °C / 92 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark 压力测试

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 %
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 %
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 % 0%
Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.7 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.1 % +1%
Lenovo Tab K12 Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6400, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	97.9 %

Lenovo Tab K12; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø2.04 (2.03-2.04)

Lenovo Tab K12; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.24-7.28)

Lenovo Tab K12; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø1.03 (1.016-1.037)

发言人

四个扬声器产生的音效不错，音量也足够大。音量大时，声音会变得有些单薄，但略微可闻的低音通常可以弥补这一点。

没有 3.5 毫米音频接口，音频连接使用 USB 端口。此外，还可以通过蓝牙连接扬声器和耳机，蓝牙有许多重要的编解码器。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo Tab K12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 64% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (92.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 20%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 快速充电，长时间运行

能源消耗

该平板电脑的充电功率可达 45 瓦，充电时间不到 1:30 小时。

与同类设备相比，它的能耗总体较低。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	2 / 2.3 / 2.5 Watt
Load	5.9 / 7.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo Tab K12 10200 mAh	Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 10200 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro 12000 mAh	Average Mediatek Dimensity 6400	Average of class Tablet
Power Consumption		3%	-88%	6%	-60%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	2	1.9 5%	1.22 39%	1.597 ?(0.89 - 2, n=3) 20%	2.05 ?(0.7 - 5.6, n=73, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Average * (Watt)	2.3	2.1 9%	7.21 -213%	2.19 ?(2.1 - 2.3, n=3) 5%	4.07 ?(1.2 - 9.2, n=73, last 2 years) -77%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	2.5	2.4 4%	7.23 -189%	2.37 ?(2.2 - 2.5, n=3) 5%	4.43 ?(1.56 - 9.5, n=73, last 2 years) -77%
Load Average * (Watt)	5.9	5.9 -0%	8.9 -51%	5.9 ?(5.9 - 5.9, n=2) -0%	9.27 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=65, last 2 years) -57%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	7.2	7.3 -1%	8.94 -24%	7.25 ?(7.2 - 7.3, n=2) -1%	13.6 ?(5.7 - 41.6, n=65, last 2 years) -89%

* ... smaller is better

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab K12; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.79 (2.03-5.97)

Lenovo Tab K12; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.19 (2.12-2.5)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Lenovo Tab K12; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.57 (3.32-4.51)

Lenovo Tab K12; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2.19 (2.12-2.5)

电池寿命

在我们的无线局域网测试中，这款平板电脑只用了不到 15 个小时，表现出色，10,200 毫安时电池的续航时间也不错，即使在附近没有电源插座的情况下，你也能度过漫长的工作日。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		14h 48min

	Lenovo Tab K12 10200 mAh	Lenovo Idea Tab Plus 10200 mAh	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro 10200 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro 12000 mAh
Battery runtime		1%	-11%	18%
WiFi v1.3 (h)	14.8	14.9 1%	13.1 -11%	17.5 18%
Reader / Idle (h)				48.3
Load (h)				4.8

Notebookcheck 总体评分

联想 Tab K12 主要面向企业客户，但如果私人客户看重良好的设备和大量内存，那么它也会是一款有趣的产品。

Back to the verdict

Lenovo Tab K12 - 03/27/2026 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

86 / 98 → 88%

Keyboard

71 / 80 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

40 / 69 → 59%

Weight

83 / 40-88 → 89%

Battery

90%

Display

82%

Games Performance

5 / 65 → 8%

Application Performance

56 / 92 → 61%

AI Performance

14%

Temperature

95%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 91 → 85%

Camera

54 / 90 → 60%

Average

62%

79%

Tablet - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
94.9%

Repairability
50%

Software Updates
55%

Total Sustainability Score: 50%

可比较的替代品

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 78.7%	Lenovo Tab K12 Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	List Price: 349€	530 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS
2. 78.9%	Lenovo Idea Tab Plus Mediatek Dimensity 6400 ⎘ ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	List Price: 299 Euro	530 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI IPS
3. 83%	Motorola Moto Pad 60 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8300 ⎘ ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 128 GB	List Price: 310€	620 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12.70" 2944x1840 273 PPI IPS
4. 81.2%	Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘ 8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1	List Price: 300€	610 g	256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12.10" 2560x1600 249 PPI TFT-LCD

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!

Android 配备 5G 和大量内存的中端最佳商务平板电脑 - 联想 Tab K12 评测

非常适合商务用途。

联想 Tab K12 的评价

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

Table of Contents

规格

外壳 - 令人印象深刻的轻质铝机箱

尺寸比较

功能 - 带有大量内存的平板电脑

microSD 读卡器

跨平台磁盘测试 (CPDT)

软件 - 少一点臃肿的软件

可持续性

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - WiFi 5 速度缓慢，令人失望

照相机 - 简单图片

配件 - 可使用笔输入

输入设备和操作 - 指纹传感器丢失

显示屏 - 无 PWM 的 IPS 屏幕

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 越多越好

排放--几乎没有变暖

温度

3DMark 压力测试

发言人

Lenovo Tab K12 audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Pad 2 Pro audio analysis

电池寿命 - 快速充电，长时间运行

能源消耗

耗电量：Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

功耗：GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

可比较的替代品

Transparency

More articles related to this device