结论--一个疯狂的概念,但实际上很有用
虽然独特的笔记本电脑设计,如 ThinkPad X1 Fold或 华硕 ZenBook Duo等独特的笔记本电脑设计让人兴奋不已,但它们在采用独特显示屏的过程中牺牲了一些人体工学设计。前者严重依赖笨重的配件来实现功能,而后者的双屏幕设置在软件支持方面可能会出现问题,视角也很刁钻。ThinkBook Plus Gen6 可折叠机型避免了所有这些问题,它采用传统而熟悉的 14 英寸蛤壳式设计,提供一块 16.7 英寸大显示屏,无需笨重的额外配件或支架。这种差异可以说是该机型的最大优势之一,尤其是对于经常需要处理小件物品或工作空间狭小的旅行者而言。
高大的 16.7 英寸 OLED 屏幕也有一些缺点。例如,不支持横向显示和触摸屏,而重量和厚度则分别比大多数传统的笔记本电脑(如 惠普 EliteBook G1i 14或 戴尔 XPS 14.
除了显示屏之外,端口选项也令人失望,而且价格也令人难以接受,接近 3500 美元,而上述 ZenBook Duo 则在 2000 美元左右。铰链角度比一般产品窄,这使得系统更难在膝上使用,尤其是在扩展显示模式下。
不过,由于扩展显示屏不需要额外的桌面空间或配件,我们发现几乎没有什么情况下我们会选择使用 14 英寸屏幕而不是 16.7 英寸屏幕。这种功能几乎让人上瘾,以至于普通的 14 英寸笔记本电脑显示屏开始感觉拥挤或太小。
Pros
Cons
ThinkBook Plus Gen6 在 2025 年美国消费电子展(CES 2025)上亮相,它是一款独特的 14 英寸蛤壳式笔记本电脑,可以垂直扩展 OLED 屏幕,从而获得更大的 16.7 英寸屏幕尺寸。它是继联想其他独特机型(如 ThinkBook Plus Twist Gen4等联想独特机型的脚步、 ThinkBook Plus Gen5 混合型 2 合 1Android 和 Windows 双启动,以及 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16和配备可折叠 OLED 的 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16。
除了我们的 Core Ultra 7 258V 测试机外,目前还没有其他配置,因为预计销量不会很大。事实上,该机型以 3300 美元的高价上市。
该领域的竞争对手包括传统的 14 英寸蛤壳机,如 戴尔 Pro 14 Premium或 惠普 EliteBook X G1i 14 AI或华硕 ZenBook 14 Duo 等双屏机型。
更多联想评测:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
表壳 - 传统外观与隐藏功能
机身顶部和底部采用阳极氧化铝材质,并通过了 MIL-STD-810H 认证,这与大多数其他 ThinkBook 机型相同。机身合上时,感觉和外观都与普通笔记本电脑无异,但打开盖子后,可滚动屏幕就显而易见了。
机箱的坚固程度参差不齐。虽然底座很坚固,但盖子比许多传统笔记本电脑(如 戴尔 XPS 14或 惠普 Spectre.由于 OLED 屏幕没有大猩猩玻璃加固,因此盖子更容易变形和扭曲。
由于铰链的最大角度比其他大多数笔记本电脑都窄,只有约 120 度,因此用户要小心使用。尤其是当显示屏处于扩展模式,重心发生变化时,铰链会感觉有点脆弱。
与戴尔 Pro 14 Premium 或惠普 EliteBook X G1i 14 等传统的 14 英寸蛤壳机相比,联想的笔记本明显更厚更重。 惠普 EliteBook X G1i 14因此,可滚动的 16.7 英寸屏幕肯定存在便携性方面的缺陷。相反,它与双屏幕的 华硕 ZenBook 14 Duo在尺寸和重量方面更为接近。即便如此,ThinkBook 可滚动屏幕仍然比大多数 16 英寸的蛤壳机(包括联想自己的 ThinkBook 16.
连接性
令人失望的是,端口仅限于左侧边缘的两个 USB-C Thunderbolt 4 端口。传统的蛤壳机,如 戴尔 Pro 14 Premium或惠普 EliteBook X G1i 14 相比,集成了更多选项,包括全尺寸 HDMI 和 USB-A。
网络摄像头
标配 500 万像素网络摄像头以及红外和电子快门。

维护
可持续性
电池组和扬声器使用了 30% 的消费后再生塑料,GaN USB-C 交流适配器使用了 90% 的再生塑料,底盖使用了 50% 的再生铝。包装不使用塑料。
配件和保修
与 ThinkPad Fold 不同的是,该机型并不依赖任何繁琐的配件来最大限度地发挥其独特功能,因此零售包装盒中没有任何额外配件。如果在美国购买,将享受标准的一年有限保修服务。
输入设备 - IdeaPad 多于 ThinkPad
键盘
打字体验与大多数其他 ThinkBook 和 IdeaPad 机型相似,好坏不一。如果键盘更像 ThinkPad,而不是更软更浅的按键,那就更好了。与旧款 ThinkBook 相比,现在的按键标签更大且居中。
触摸板
点击板尺寸(12 x 7.5 厘米)和质地与 ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid 完全相同。 ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid.但主要区别在于,ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable 的点击板具有触觉振动功能,按下时可获得更好的触觉反馈,类似于智能手机上的振动反馈。点击板的工作足够稳定,但如果将屏幕设置为扩展模式,垂直方向的光标移动可能会感到拥挤。
显示屏 - 14 英寸外形的 16.7 英寸 OLED 显示屏
当然,它的主角是可滚动的 14 至 16 英寸 120 Hz OLED 显示屏。在 14 英寸正常模式下,本机分辨率为 2000 x 1600(5:4);在 16 英寸扩展模式下,本机分辨率为 2000 x 2350(47:40)。专用键盘键可通过电机将显示屏扩展和缩回 10.5 厘米。请注意,如果电脑正在关机,扩展显示屏不会自动缩回;如果忘记缩回显示屏,则必须再次打开系统,才能缩回屏幕并正确合上盖子。如果在扩展模式下关闭盖子,系统会发出提示音,以防止潜在的损坏。
从人体工学角度看,扩展模式下的屏幕感觉很自然,没有学习曲线。它基本上变成了一个纵向的 16.7 英寸显示屏,可用于浏览或打开多个窗口。滚动屏幕避免了其他采用非传统屏幕的笔记本电脑(如 ThinkPad X1 Fold 16或 ZenBook Pro Duo.
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 390.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.66 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
calibrated: 0.47
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
CCT: 6277 K
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable Flexible OLED, 2000x2350, 16.7", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Pro 14 Premium LG Phillips 140WT1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Samsung SDC41BA, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 60 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -1% | -4% | -1% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.8 | 69.9 -29% | 99 0% | 98.4 0% | 99.9 1% | 99.7 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.4 -2% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 100 | 71.6 -28% | 95.8 -4% | 86.7 -13% | 95.2 -5% | 98.4 -2% |
Response Times | -9553% | -264% | -166% | -59% | -268% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.32 ? | 42.3 ? -13119% | 1.4 ? -338% | 1.51 ? -372% | 0.8 ? -150% | 1.8 ? -463% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.46 ? | 28 ? -5987% | 2.7 ? -487% | 1.36 ? -196% | 0.9 ? -96% | 2.4 ? -422% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 241.1 ? | 480 ? | 473.8 ? | 242.3 ? | |
PWM Amplitude * | 47 | 32 32% | 14 70% | 15 68% | 9.4 80% | |
Screen | -4% | -2% | 22% | 18% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 390.5 | 487.5 25% | 392.3 0% | 359 -8% | 381.1 -2% | 390.1 0% |
Brightness | 393 | 469 19% | 392 0% | 362 -8% | 381 -3% | 389 -1% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 95 -3% | 98 0% | 98 0% | 97 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.66 | 2.37 49% | 3.39 27% | 1.2 74% | 3.3 29% | 4.59 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.81 | 5.77 26% | 6.53 16% | 3.2 59% | 6.3 19% | 7.15 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.47 | 0.86 -83% | 0.99 -111% | 0.86 -83% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.8 -58% | 1.1 54% | 2.1 12% | 0.9 62% | 1.7 29% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.14 103% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.23 99% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6277 104% | 6540 99% | 6502 100% | 6433 101% | 6369 102% | 6220 105% |
Contrast | 1875 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -3192% /
-1600% | -89% /
-63% | -49% /
-32% | -14% /
-6% | -92% /
-66% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.46 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.23 ms rise | |
↘ 0.23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.17 ms rise | |
↘ 0.15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 47 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8320 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度一般,与许多其他 OLED Clamshell(如 戴尔 Pro 14 Premium.如下图所示,可滚动屏幕普遍存在眩光问题。一些替代产品,如 MacBook Pro 14等几款产品的显示屏亮度更高,户外使用更轻松。
性能 - 月亮湖效率
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。联想 Vantage 中的三个电源配置文件(省电模式、自适应模式和性能模式)与 Windows 的三个电源配置文件同步,便于控制。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 酷睿至尊 7 258V由于酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 已成为高端超薄笔记本电脑中常见的 CPU 选件,因此它已通过了严格的基准测试。处理器的原始性能与去年的 酷睿至尊 7 155U尽管集成的 NPU 和 GPU 性能更快,分别适合 Co-Pilot+ 和更轻量级的编辑工作负载。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (8454 - 12781, n=20) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (40875 - 63401, n=20) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1930 - 2817, n=20) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49084 - 49818, n=20) | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3817 - 4440, n=20) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (21670 - 33565, n=20) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (30957 - 40753, n=20) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (422 - 632, n=20) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4258 - 6930, n=20) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (44223 - 54971, n=20) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=19) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=19) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=19) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (8914 - 10216, n=19) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=18) | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=18) | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=18) | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=20) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7069 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (104408 - 114336, n=20) | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=20) | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (108842 - 117935, n=20) | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=20) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
三星 三星 PM9C1aPCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘显示,尽管其外形尺寸为 2242,但长时间保持超过 6000 MB/s 的传输速率不成问题。更常见的 M.2 2280 固态硬盘可能由于体积限制而不支持。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
弧形 Arc 140VArc 140V 是目前速度最快的集成显卡解决方案之一,是旧款 ThinkBook Plus 第 4 代 Twist设计的巨大升级。不过,由于内置显示屏的宽高比和分辨率与众不同,因此在大多数情况下,如果没有合适的外接显示器,不建议使用它来玩游戏。
如下表Fire Strike 所示,使用电池供电并不会造成重大的性能损失。
电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 10109 | 20718 | 3386 |
平衡模式 | 10015 | 22126 | 3645 |
电池供电 | 10114 | 22117 | 3624 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 12363 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34610 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9011 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4444 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable -1! | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium -1! | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 -1! | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 156 | 149.1 | 68.4 | 28.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 96.6 | 90 | 67.7 | 88.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 90.1 | 49.4 | 35.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.3 | 40.1 | 36.3 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 201 | 72.3 | 60.9 | 56.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 47.3 | 38.5 | 33.2 | 29.6 |
F1 24 (2024) | 99 | 88.2 | 66.2 | 21.6 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.3 / 46.7 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V | Dell Pro 14 Premium Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 268V, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02 | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 2% | 3% | -6% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 23.1 | 28.2 -22% | 23.1 -0% | 23.6 -2% | 27.5 -19% | 23.2 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 28.4 -22% | 23.1 -0% | 23.6 -2% | 28 -21% | 23.2 -0% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 28.4 -22% | 23.1 -0% | 23.6 -2% | 28.3 -22% | 23.2 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 28.8 -24% | 23.1 -0% | 23.6 -2% | 28.3 -22% | 23.2 -0% |
Load Average * | 39.3 | 33.5 15% | 38.2 3% | 39.8 -1% | 37.7 4% | 28 29% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 46.7 | 39.1 16% | 44.2 5% | 39.8 15% | 36.2 22% | 40.5 13% |
Load Maximum * | 46.7 | 40.4 13% | 44.2 5% | 39.8 15% | 37.6 19% | 40.4 13% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
系统后部附近用户较少接触的地方温度可达 40 摄氏度以上。键盘和掌托的温度也会明显升高,但不会让人感到不适。戴尔 戴尔 Pro 14 Premium和惠普 EliteBook X G1i 14 的运行温度都要低得多。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-4.8 °C / -8.6 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Dell Pro 14 Premium Intel Core Ultra 7 268V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 15% | 11% | 4% | 8% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.4 | 35 13% | 33 18% | 35.3 13% | 38 6% | 35.6 12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43 | 33.4 22% | 28 35% | 47.2 -10% | 39.4 8% | 41.6 3% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.6 | 23.8 11% | 28 -5% | 24.8 7% | 25 6% | 30.4 -14% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 24.2 13% | 28.8 -4% | 26.2 6% | 25 10% | 34 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 46 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.0 | -- | 81 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.8 | 1400 | 71 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.4 | 1900 | 68 |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 0.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, Flexible OLED, 2000x2350, 16.7" | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Pro 14 Premium Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 22% | 23% | -1% | 12% | -46% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6.5 | 2.5 62% | 3.5 46% | 4.1 37% | 3.1 52% | 9.3 -43% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 5.4 22% | 4.3 38% | 8.2 -19% | 4.4 36% | 10.9 -58% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.1 | 5.8 62% | 7.9 48% | 8.7 42% | 11.4 25% | 17.9 -19% |
Load Average * | 38.3 | 36.9 4% | 38.9 -2% | 56.7 -48% | 38.3 -0% | 62.4 -63% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 44.4 | 44.9 -1% | 38.7 13% | 47 -6% | 48.7 -10% | 57.9 -30% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.6 | 48.5 -9% | 39 13% | 48.7 -9% | 53.1 -19% | 61.5 -38% |
Load Maximum * | 63.4 | 54.6 14% | 60.7 4% | 65.1 -3% | 64.9 -2% | 107 -69% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
运行时间比许多采用 Lunar Lake 技术的 14 英寸笔记本电脑都要短,这在意料之中,但 Lunar Lake 已经非常省电,如果能拥有更大的 16.7 英寸 OLED 屏幕,那么节省几个小时也是值得的。我们使用 ThinkBook rollable 记录的实际网页浏览运行时间为 10.5 小时,而使用更传统的 戴尔 Pro 14 Premium则超过 15 小时。
使用附带的交流适配器从空电充至满电仅需不到 90 分钟。
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 66 Wh | HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | Dell Pro 14 Premium Core Ultra 7 268V, Arc 140V, 60 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, 75 Wh | HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 79% | 47% | 8% | 24% | -51% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 620 | 1110 79% | 909 47% | 667 8% | 767 24% | 305 -51% |
H.264 | 1015 |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable
- 08/14/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen6 Rollable Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,189.18 Lenovo - 21KG00ANUS ThinkBoo... List Price: 3300 USD | 1.7 kg | 19.15 mm | 16.70" 2000x2350 185 PPI Flexible OLED | |
HP EliteBook X G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $2,248.09 List Price: 3300 USD | 1.2 kg | 15 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
Dell Pro 14 Premium Intel Core Ultra 7 268V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $49.99 Smatree 14 inch Laptop Sleev... 2. $39.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 3. $55.99 Laptop Cover for Dell Pro 14... List Price: 2500 USD | 1.3 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,799.99 List Price: 2099€ | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
HP OmniBook X Flip 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $849.99 List Price: 950 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen5 Hybrid Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $749.98 Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Business... 2. $959.99 2025 Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i ... 3. $1,099.99 Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Gen 4 Bu... List Price: 2750 USD | 1.7 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.