Notebookcheck

微软 Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB) 变形本简短评测

Sebastian Bade (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 09/05/2017
Business Convertible / 2-in-1 Kaby Lake Tablet Windows

平价Surface!虽然现在已经是2017的下半年了,微软推出的这款节能型酷睿m3处理器笔记本,它的连接性依然需要重做。 快从评测中了解到它的续航能力如何,以及大品牌是否足以吸引用户。

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Surface Pro Series)
Graphics adapter
Memory
4096 MB 
, DDR3, dual-channel, onboard
Display
12.3 inch 3:2, 2736x1826 pixel 267 PPI, 10 finger multitouch, native pen support, LG Display LP123WQ112604, IPS, glossy: yes, detachable screen
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-Y Premium PCH
Storage
Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, 128 GB 
, 80 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek High Definition Audio
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: mic/headphone combo, Card Reader: micro SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyroscope, TPM 2.0
Networking
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller (a/b/g/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 292.1 x 201.4
Battery
45 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 13.5 h
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix front, Windows Hello
Secondary Camera: 8 MPix AF, rear
Additional features
Office 366 (trial), One Drive, Xing, Candy Crush, March of Empires, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
1.072 kg, Power Supply: 154 g
Price
879 ($899) EUR

 

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB)

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
72.62 MB/s ∼100% +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
60.5 MB/s ∼83%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
53.8 MB/s ∼74% -11%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
(Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
93.77 MB/s ∼100% +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
86.5 MB/s ∼92% +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
(Toshiba Exceria Pro M401 64 GB)
85.9 MB/s ∼92%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
586 MBit/s ∼100% +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
577 MBit/s ∼98% +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
550 MBit/s ∼94%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Tri-Band Wireless-AC 18260
513 MBit/s ∼88% -7%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Tri-Band Wireless-AC 18260
662 MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
655 MBit/s ∼99%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Marvell AVASTAR Wireless-AC Network Controller
618 MBit/s ∼93% -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265
440 MBit/s ∼66% -33%
430
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
455
cd/m²
461
cd/m²
452
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
449
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 461 cd/m² Average: 444.1 cd/m² Minimum: 4.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 461 cd/m²
Contrast: 1356:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.43 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.08 | - Ø
99% sRGB (Argyll) 64% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 3.03
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1826, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
LG Display LP123WQ112604, , 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
AUO B120YAN01 / AUO106F, , 2880x1920, 12
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
LG Philips, , 1920x1280, 12.1
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
LSN120QL01L01, , 2160 x 1440, 12
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Digital Flat Panel (NoName), , 2160x1440, 12.1
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Panasonic VVX12T041N00, , 2160x1440, 12
Screen
-16%
3%
-24%
-40%
-29%
111%
-37%
Brightness
444
466
5%
401
-10%
396
-11%
319
-28%
344
-23%
378
-15%
328
-26%
Brightness Distribution
93
92
-1%
88
-5%
88
-5%
97
4%
78
-16%
90
-3%
91
-2%
Black Level *
0.34
0.395
-16%
0.29
15%
0.3
12%
0.42
-24%
0.39
-15%
0.03
91%
0.38
-12%
Contrast
1356
1220
-10%
1438
6%
1353
0%
767
-43%
995
-27%
12100
792%
908
-33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.43
4
-17%
3.63
-6%
5.28
-54%
6.02
-76%
4.6
-34%
4.8
-40%
8.4
-145%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.08
5.7
-85%
2.18
29%
6.71
-118%
6.29
-104%
6.1
-98%
5.04
-64%
4.3
-40%
Gamma
3.03 79%
2.28 105%
3.09 78%
2.29 105%
2.4 100%
2.07 116%
2.57 93%
2.63 91%
CCT
7014 93%
7950 82%
6767 96%
6532 100%
7712 84%
7104 91%
7255 90%
7368 88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
64
62
-3%
63
-2%
59
-8%
47.8
-25%
59
-8%
73
14%
62
-3%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
96
-3%
99
0%
91
-8%
73.2
-26%
91
-8%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 52 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (42.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 57 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 6272 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC Latency
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (benchmark)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points ∼84% +51%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
141 Points ∼72% +31%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
130 Points ∼67% +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
115 Points ∼59% +6%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points ∼58% +6%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
111 Points ∼57% +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel Core m3-7Y30
108 Points ∼55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
86 Points ∼44% -20%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (min: 335.35) Points ∼19% +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
334 Points ∼16% +29%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
289 Points ∼13% +12%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
265 Points ∼12% +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel Core m3-7Y30
258 Points ∼12%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
255 Points ∼12% -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
234 Points ∼11% -9%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
204 Points ∼9% -21%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
253.3 Points ∼76% +47%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
219 Points ∼66% +27%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
207.01 Points ∼62% +20%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
184.45 Points ∼55% +7%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
178.8 Points ∼54% +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel Core m3-7Y30
172.36 Points ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
137.96 Points ∼41% -20%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
112.41 Points ∼34% -35%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
133.3 Points ∼40% -23%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
37106 Points ∼75% +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel Core i5-7300U
33186 Points ∼67% +41%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
30994 Points ∼63% +31%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
30411 Points ∼61% +29%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
26727 Points ∼54% +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel Core m3-7Y30
23605 Points ∼48%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
23339 Points ∼47% -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
18576 Points ∼38% -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel Core m3-6Y30
1873 ms * ∼3% -31%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel Core i5-6200U
1445.2 ms * ∼2% -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel Core m3-7Y30
1428 ms * ∼2%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel Core m5-6Y54
1305.7 ms * ∼2% +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel Core i5-7Y54
1132.1 ms * ∼2% +21%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel Core i7-7500U
1082 ms * ∼2% +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
927 ms * ∼2% +35%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
5253 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
5363
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
8846
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4071
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6419 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
11264 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
2.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
32.21 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.24 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
108 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
36.15 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
258 Points
Help
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 8 Storage
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4431 Points ∼100% +24%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4288 Points ∼97% +20%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
4216 Points ∼95% +18%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3996 Points ∼90% +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
3983 Points ∼90% +11%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3932 Points ∼89% +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
3586 Points ∼81%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
3311 Points ∼75% -8%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
5540 Points ∼100% +48%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3924 Points ∼71% +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
3754 Points ∼68%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
3423 Points ∼62% -9%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
4095 Points ∼100% +41%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
3281 Points ∼80% +13%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
3186 Points ∼78% +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3092 Points ∼76% +7%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
2983 Points ∼73% +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2936 Points ∼72% +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
2896 Points ∼71%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
2217 Points ∼54% -23%
PCMark 10
Productivity
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
6665 Points ∼100% +65%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
5009 Points ∼75% +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
4051 Points ∼61%
Score
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
3909 Points ∼100% +56%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
2957 Points ∼76% +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
2509 Points ∼64%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2896 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
3754 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3586 points
Help
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
78%
38%
193%
-2%
94%
-33%
-14%
Write 4k QD32
172
421.48
145%
373
117%
420.8
145%
268.4
56%
259
51%
135
-22%
197.1
15%
Read 4k QD32
301.8
485.58
61%
423
40%
504.1
67%
285
-6%
247.9
-18%
236.2
-22%
272
-10%
Write 4k
98.76
136.27
38%
125
27%
162.2
64%
90.27
-9%
120
22%
48.44
-51%
76.83
-22%
Read 4k
40.11
53.64
34%
46
15%
53.62
34%
28.31
-29%
52.34
30%
27.49
-31%
29.3
-27%
Write 512
241
791.87
229%
445
85%
1288
434%
295.7
23%
869
261%
160.9
-33%
201
-17%
Read 512
261.1
227.5
-13%
225
-14%
1301
398%
351.7
35%
697.5
167%
298.7
14%
374.9
44%
Write Seq
669.9
960.7
43%
853
27%
1702
154%
297.2
-56%
1259
88%
162.9
-76%
199.9
-70%
Read Seq
690.5
1307.9
89%
723
5%
2408
249%
500.5
-28%
1739
152%
419.8
-39%
518.1
-25%
Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
Sequential Read: 690.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 669.9 MB/s
512K Read: 261.1 MB/s
512K Write: 241 MB/s
4K Read: 40.11 MB/s
4K Write: 98.76 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 301.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 172 MB/s
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
1418 Points ∼100% +90%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
889 Points ∼63% +19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
797 Points ∼56% +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
748 Points ∼53%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
728 Points ∼51% -3%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
589 Points ∼42% -21%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
11264 Points ∼100% +85%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
7307 Points ∼65% +20%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
7270 Points ∼65% +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7300U
7265 Points ∼64% +19%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
6308 Points ∼56% +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
6164 Points ∼55% +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
6096 Points ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
4760 Points ∼42% -22%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, Intel Core i7-7660U
2493 Points ∼100% +99%
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1428 Points ∼57% +14%
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1416 Points ∼57% +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core m3-7Y30
1251 Points ∼50%
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m5-6Y54
1200 Points ∼48% -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
Intel HD Graphics 615, Intel Core i5-7Y54
1161 Points ∼47% -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
Intel HD Graphics 515, Intel Core m3-6Y30
980 Points ∼39% -22%
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
 
3DMark 11 Performance
1385 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
45269 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
4794 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
699 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
310 points
Help
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 42.625.220.84.6fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 31.222.718.9fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 14.29.4fps
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
HD Graphics 615, 7Y30, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
HD Graphics 620, 7300U, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Iris Plus Graphics 640, 7660U, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
HD Graphics 620, 7500U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0)
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
HD Graphics 515, 6Y54, Liteon L8H-256V2G
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
HD Graphics 615, 7Y54, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Lite-On CV1-8B128
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2
Heat
1%
6%
-3%
8%
-3%
-8%
-2%
Maximum Upper Side *
40.5
39.2
3%
42
-4%
42
-4%
39
4%
47.2
-17%
42.5
-5%
46.7
-15%
Maximum Bottom *
40.6
40.3
1%
42
-3%
43.6
-7%
41.2
-1%
49.8
-23%
44.6
-10%
51
-26%
Idle Upper Side *
37.8
37
2%
31
18%
32.8
13%
29.5
22%
30.8
19%
36.6
3%
29.5
22%
Idle Bottom *
32
32.3
-1%
28
12%
36.4
-14%
29.8
7%
29.2
9%
38.6
-21%
28.6
11%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 37.1 °C39 °C38.7 °C 
 34.8 °C37.4 °C37.4 °C 
 35 °C40.5 °C36.3 °C 
Maximum: 40.5 °C
Average: 37.4 °C
39 °C40.6 °C38 °C
37 °C39.8 °C35 °C
35.8 °C36.9 °C35.3 °C
Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.533.133.52533.132.933.13137.432.637.44034.829.834.85040.937.940.96331.731.131.78029.628.229.610034.524.534.512544.624.944.616049.524.449.52005223.35225050.622.250.631548.421.448.44005920.45950059.619.259.663062.118.762.180068.818.268.8100065.317.765.3125061.617.561.6160063.517.363.5200065.517.465.5250068.817.568.8315066.317.566.3400060.717.760.7500065.517.865.5630061.31861.3800058.318.258.31000056.918.256.91250051.918.351.91600044.318.444.3SPL76.530.376.5N381.438median 59.6Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)median 18.2median 59.6Delta6.52.26.536353637.428.237.435.825.435.83729.83737.928.537.940.728.940.740.429.140.440.928.940.943.528.443.545274548.723.848.75022.75056.721.956.758.320.958.358.120.558.162.219.562.264.918.464.960.818.260.860.917.860.961.21861.267.817.867.865.217.865.260.317.960.35817.95855.81855.856.71856.757.117.957.156.117.856.145.117.745.142.517.842.57430.77432.31.532.3median 57.1Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5median 18median 57.15.92.15.9hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5 audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 23%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.33 / 0.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 3.1 / 8.8 / 9.8 Watt
Load midlight 22.7 / 23.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM971 KUS020203M, IPS, 2736x1826, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM971 KUS030202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Samsung PM971 KUS040202M, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2880x1920, 12
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, Liteon L8H-256V2G, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.1
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 2160 x 1440, 12
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, Lite-On CV1-8B128, sAMOLED, 2160x1440, 12.1
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2, IPS, 2160x1440, 12
Power Consumption
-2%
-40%
-7%
-4%
4%
17%
-38%
Idle Minimum *
3.1
3.6
-16%
4.2
-35%
3.5
-13%
3.7
-19%
5
-61%
3.4
-10%
7.3
-135%
Idle Average *
8.8
8.1
8%
10.1
-15%
7.2
18%
6.8
23%
6.3
28%
8
9%
10
-14%
Idle Maximum *
9.8
8.7
11%
14
-43%
7.9
19%
7.6
22%
7.8
20%
9
8%
10.15
-4%
Load Average *
22.7
25.5
-12%
37.4
-65%
29.6
-30%
22.5
1%
19.5
14%
12
47%
25.2
-11%
Load Maximum *
23.6
23.5
-0%
34
-44%
30.8
-31%
34.5
-46%
19.6
17%
16.1
32%
29.3
-24%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.1

* ... smaller is better

Maximum battery runtime
Maximum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
Charging time
Charging time
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
15h 33min
WiFi Surfing v1.3 (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
11h 22min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 18min
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017)
7Y30, HD Graphics 615, 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i5
7300U, HD Graphics 620, 45 Wh
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
7660U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 45 Wh
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 720-12IKB
7500U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
HP Elite x2 1012 G1
6Y54, HD Graphics 515, 37 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Tablet Gen 2
7Y54, HD Graphics 615, 37 Wh
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro S W700N
6Y30, HD Graphics 515, 39.5 Wh
Acer Aspire Switch Alpha 12 SA5-271-56HM
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 37 Wh
Battery Runtime
2%
-26%
-39%
-32%
-32%
-9%
-39%
Reader / Idle
933
1054
13%
713
-24%
732
-22%
662
-29%
1110
19%
640
-31%
H.264
668
614
-8%
432
-35%
515
-23%
468
-30%
WiFi v1.3
682
744
9%
489
-28%
345
-49%
443
-35%
441
-35%
525
-23%
321
-53%
Load
198
168
-15%
112
-43%
111
-44%
130
-34%
134
-32%
112
-43%
Witcher 3 ultra
115

Pros

+ 优雅的高品质材料
+ 非常好的构建
+ 绝对无声
+ 重量轻
+ 电池寿命长
+ 非常好的屏幕(视角稳定,高色彩空间覆盖)
+ 吸引人的定价
+ 稳定的系统性能
+ 优秀的相机模块与Windows Hello

Cons

- 非常保守的热限(62°C)
- 高度反光的屏幕
- 没有USB Type-C
- 没有升级选项
- 非常昂贵的配件
- 没有其他硬件组合的可能
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017), courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017), courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

基于英特尔的酷睿m3 Y7Y30的微软Surface Pro 2017,各方面都是合适的,安装的硬件非常平衡。高效的组件可以大大改善已经很长的电池续航。但是,这是以牺牲计算能力为代价的。英特尔酷睿m3 7Y30足以满足日常工作,但不能与更快的i5和i7 Surface Pro 2017变形本竞争。然而,系统性能评价为良好,而与更快的竞品的距离通常只有几个百分点。

微软Surface Pro 2017入门级配置机,主要靠其价格吸引用户。唯一不足是, 制造商在此基础上不提供其他硬件配置。

极好的屏幕给我们留下了深刻的印象。其高的色彩空间覆盖和高屏幕分辨率,肯定适合准专业领域。然而,其面板必须接受批评,因为它高度反光的表面显然限制了其户外适应性。最大问题仍然是其有限的配置选项。128 GB的固态硬盘存储空间很快就会被用满,无法更换存储设备。此外,为什么外观保持先进,但连接性没有。2017,该机至少应该配备一个支持雷电的USB Type-C端口。

注:本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本,阅读完整的英文评测,请点击这里

Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) - 08/07/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
90 / 98 → 91%
Keyboard
89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
49 / 80 → 61%
Weight
74 / 78 → 91%
Battery
93%
Display
89%
Games Performance
54 / 68 → 79%
Application Performance
76 / 87 → 88%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
86 / 91 → 95%
Camera
71 / 85 → 83%
Average
81%
89%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 微软 Surface Pro (2017) (Core m3, 128GB, 4GB) 变形本简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2017-09- 5 (Update: 2017-09-11)