微软Surface Pro 9 ARM评测--高端ARM敞篷车令人失望

Name: Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM
Brand: Microsoft

5G和无风扇。 微软现在提供的新Surface Pro 9也采用了ARM处理器，这带来了一些优势，如集成5G连接和无风扇操作。另一方面，尽管价格更高，但性能也明显不如英特尔版本。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/06/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ARM 5G Convertible / 2-in-1 MS Surface Touchscreen Windows

微软已经停用了旧的废弃了旧的Surface Pro X产品线，现在提供两个版本的新Surface Pro 9来代替。我们已经测试了英特尔的型号现在我们看看采用高通公司ARM处理器的机型。乍一看，最明显的区别是ARM版本的集成5G调制解调器和没有风扇，这确保Surface Pro 9 ARM总是安静地运行。

就价格而言，配备8GB内存和128GB小型固态硬盘的ARM型号起价为1549欧元（约合人民币1648元），这使得它比配备8GB内存和256GB固态硬盘的Core-i5版本贵了1299欧元（约合人民币1382元；仅限可兑换，输入设备需额外付费）。虽然ARM版本当然提供5G，但如果有256GB的存储空间，它就比可比的i5型号贵350欧元（约372美元）。通过更昂贵的价格，微软暗示该产品至少是一样好的，但情况真的是这样吗？

我们的测试装置是带有256个固态硬盘存储的版本，价格为1659欧元（约合人民币1765元），另外280欧元（约合人民币298元）用于购买键盘和输入笔，结果是整套产品的总价格为1940欧元（约合人民币2063元）。由于许多地方与最近测试的英特尔型号相同，在这篇评论中，我们只讨论差异，主要关注ARM SoC的性能和兼容性。你可以在我们的评测中找到关于外壳、输入设备、显示器和扬声器的详细信息。配备Core-i7处理器的Surface Pro 9.

Test device courtesy of Microsoft Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM (Surface Pro Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 8 x 2.4 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X1 / A78

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 690

Memory

8 GB

, DDR4

Display

13.00 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 266 PPI, capacitive, native pen support, LP129WT232166, IPS, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256GB, 180 GB free

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, 1 Docking Station Port, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: light sensor, hall sensor, acceleration sensor, position sensor

Networking

Qualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1, 5G

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 9.3 x 287 x 209

Battery

47.7 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 19 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: IR
Primary Camera: 10 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 39W PSU, 12 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

883 g

Price

1660 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86.9 %	03/2023	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	883 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
88.4 %	01/2023	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	877 g	9.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
84.4 %	10/2019	Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685	1 kg	7.3 mm	13.00"	2880x1920
86.7 %	10/2022	Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1.1 kg	13.4 mm	13.30"	1920x1200
84 %	08/2021	HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680	1.3 kg	16 mm	13.50"	1920x1280
91.8 %	11/2022	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU	682 g	6.4 mm	12.90"	2732x2048

与英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9的区别

基本上，这两个版本的Surface Pro 9在外观上看起来几乎是一样的。由于它是被动冷却的，ARM型号只缺少风扇通风口。它也只有深灰色或银色可供选择。外壳的尺寸是相同的，因此可以使用相同的键盘。ARM型号只重了6克（约0.2盎司）。此外，充电器的功率较弱，为39瓦，但也稍轻（210克对260克，~7.4对9.2盎司）。背面的维护挡板，在英特尔型号中非常容易打开，而在ARM型号中又需要一个SIM卡工具。

内置的5G模块是两款机型之间的另一个重要区别，因为与前几代相比，微软不再为英特尔机型提供WWAN模块了。采用高通SoC的Surface Pro 9可以支持NanoSIM或eSIM。为了测试这一点，我们使用了Telekom公司的NanoSIM，能够毫无问题地连接到5G网络。

与英特尔版本的AX211模块一样，WLAN模块（高通WCN685x）支持当前的Wi-Fi 6E标准，我们能够毫无问题地连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。传输速率很稳定，但发送性能总体上稍弱。然而，在日常操作中，你应该不会在这里遇到任何限制。

最后，高通SoC还为内置摄像头提供了一些工作室效果。例如，你可以改变背景，或者相机可以让人集中在图像的中心，效果可以接受。

ARM型号还为微软自己的配件提供了Surface Connect端口，但这里缺少对Thunderbolt 4的支持。两个USB-C端口只支持USB-3.2标准，包括充电功能和图像输出。

尺寸比较

HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Microsoft Surface Pro X Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 DIN A4 ❌

左边：2个USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10Gbit/s，充电，DisplayPort ALT模式）。

Networking
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1387 (min: 1345) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1627 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1628 (min: 1529) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1632 (min: 1569) MBit/s ∼100%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Qualcomm Wi-Fi B/G/N/AC (2x2)
iperf3 transmit AX12	319 (min: 168) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AX12	595 (min: 575) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm WCN685x
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1745 (min: 1683) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1749 (min: 1715) MBit/s ∼100%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AX12	479 (min: 314) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	284 (min: 169) MBit/s ∼48%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼28%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼25%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼43%

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1386 (1345-1438)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1564-1665)

性能--微软SQ3别名骁龙8cx第三代

在新的Surface Pro 9 ARM中，微软使用了SQ3 SoC，它的另一个名字是高通Snapdragon 8cx第三代的另一个名称，该芯片也用于联想ThinkPad X13s，比如说。Adreno 690 GPU作为显卡，该SoC可以由8或16GB的内存支持。对于固态硬盘，你可以选择从128GB到512GB，但也有可能在以后更换紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘。

测试条件

没有具体的电源模式，我们也无法可靠地测量该处理器的时钟速度和TDP。根据高通公司的说法，其消耗量为7瓦。然而，从该设备的功耗来看，在负载下应该增加到近30瓦。

与我们之前测试的 Surface Pro X和 SQ1 SoC，微软现在支持64位应用程序的模拟，使我们也能运行明显更多的基准测试。但和以前一样，它仍然不支持所有的应用程序。

处理器 - 高通8cx第三代

高通公司高通公司8cx第三代芯片是一个具有四个性能（最高3GHz）和四个效率核心（最高2.4GHz）的ARM处理器，大致对应于Apple M2和目前英特尔移动处理器的设计理念。

8cx第三代的多核性能基本上一点也不差，对应于旧的 Surface Pro 7配有酷睿i7-1065G7.然而，问题是单核性能较弱，这在日常操作中也很容易被发现。Surface Pro 9在与现代英特尔CPU或甚至Apple 自己的ARM处理器（如M2）的竞争中根本没有机会。 Apple M2这里。

在电池运行中，CPU的性能并没有降低。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3: Ø700 (640.9-773.99)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U: Ø1293 (1168.77-1576.35)

Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7: Ø839 (789.09-994.68)

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø513 (475.43-784.28)

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Intel Core i7-1065G7: Ø592 (555.54-783.03)

Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Core i5-1035G4 Intel Core i5-1035G4: Ø518 (495.42-684.65)

Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2: Ø955 (863.48-1215.33)

Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	9517 Points +167%
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18070, n=66, last 2 years)	9450 Points +165%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	8667 Points +143%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	5668 Points +59%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	4125 Points +16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3534 - 3709, n=3)	3603 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3567 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3534 Points -1%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1656 Points +172%
Average of class Convertible (307 - 1970, n=66, last 2 years)	1590 Points +162%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	1585 Points +161%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	1512 Points +149%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	1305 Points +115%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	608 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	598 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (559 - 608, n=3)	588 Points -3%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	3616 Points +190%
Average of class Convertible (242 - 6954, n=66, last 2 years)	3561 Points +185%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	2231 Points +79%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	2097 Points +68%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	1573 Points +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1248 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (810 - 1258, n=3)	1105 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	810 Points -35%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	638 Points +221%
Average of class Convertible (116.8 - 755, n=65, last 2 years)	610 Points +207%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	578 Points +190%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	501 Points +152%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	222 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	216 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (199 - 222, n=3)	209 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	199 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=67, last 2 years)	1583 Points +105%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1576 (1168.77^min - 1576.35^max) Points +104%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	1215 (863^min - 1215^max) Points +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	995 (789.61^min - 994.68^max) Points +29%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	784 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	774 (640.9^min - 773.99^max) Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (723 - 774, n=2)	749 Points -3%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 287, n=65, last 2 years)	232 Points +95%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	224 Points +88%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	222 Points +86%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	222 Points +86%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	188 Points +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	119.1 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (119 - 119.1, n=2)	119.1 Points 0%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1600 Seconds * -51%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1059 - 1600, n=3)	1246 Seconds * -18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1059 Seconds *
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	735 Seconds * +31%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	713 Seconds * +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	569 Seconds * +46%
Average of class Convertible (193 - 3620, n=61, last 2 years)	441 Seconds * +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	382 Seconds * +64%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Convertible (7703 - 72400, n=63, last 2 years)	39855 MIPS +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	37320 MIPS +52%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	24679 MIPS +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	24505 MIPS
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	22950 MIPS -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (16223 - 24505, n=3)	21572 MIPS -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	16223 MIPS -34%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Convertible (2046 - 6417, n=63, last 2 years)	5177 MIPS +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	5168 MIPS +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	5150 MIPS +31%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	4313 MIPS +9%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3946 MIPS
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (3874 - 3946, n=3)	3912 MIPS -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3874 MIPS -2%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	8951 Points +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	8821 Points +17%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2	8524 Points +13%
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=67, last 2 years)	8263 Points +10%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	7522 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (4457 - 7522, n=2)	5990 Points -20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	5759 Points -23%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	4866 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	4457 Points -41%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G	3143 Points -58%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Microsoft SQ1	2875 Points -62%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2	1914 Points +13%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2	1890 Points +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	1712 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1690 Points
Average of class Convertible (319 - 1981, n=67, last 2 years)	1618 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1486 - 1690, n=2)	1588 Points -6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	1548 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1486 Points -12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	1334 Points -21%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G	801 Points -53%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Microsoft SQ1	739 Points -56%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Convertible (0.61 - 20.1, n=65, last 2 years)	10.5 fps +317%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	10.1 fps +301%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	6.49 fps +158%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	6.09 fps +142%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	2.52 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1.5 - 2.68, n=3)	2.23 fps -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1.5 fps -40%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	121.5 s *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (115.5 - 121.5, n=3)	118.2 s * +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	115.5 s * +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	57.2 s * +53%
Average of class Convertible (42 - 223, n=63, last 2 years)	53.9 s * +56%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	51.3 s * +58%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	51.1 s * +58%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1.013 sec *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1.011 - 1.013, n=3)	1.012 sec * -0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	1.011 sec * -0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7	0.68 sec * +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7	0.568 sec * +44%
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.967, n=63, last 2 years)	0.538 sec * +47%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U	0.52 sec * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

774 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

13.4 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

119.1 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Convertible	97.8 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	93.9 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	78.5 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	74.3 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	34.2 pt
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	29.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	22.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Convertible (109 - 25226, n=66, last 2 years)	8393 KRay/s +219%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8127 KRay/s +209%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7249 KRay/s +176%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6545 KRay/s +149%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	2627 KRay/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (343 - 2627, n=3)	1839 KRay/s -30%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	343 KRay/s -87%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 106512, n=65, last 2 years)	43819 Points +210%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	41353 Points +193%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	30075 Points +113%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	27865 Points +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	14650 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (13729 - 14650, n=3)	14164 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	14113 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2089 MB/s +83%
Average of class Convertible (121 - 4764, n=65, last 2 years)	2087 MB/s +82%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1983 MB/s +73%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1847 MB/s +61%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1144 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (453 - 1144, n=3)	900 MB/s -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	453 MB/s -60%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Convertible (3256 - 120368, n=65, last 2 years)	69642 Points +153%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	65820 Points +140%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47866 Points +74%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	44541 Points +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	27474 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (15447 - 27474, n=3)	23377 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	15447 Points -44%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Convertible (549 - 14835, n=65, last 2 years)	6351 Points +405%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	5095 Points +305%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4598 Points +266%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	4316 Points +243%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1257 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1223 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (1161 - 1257, n=3)	1214 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 56839, n=65, last 2 years)	22520 Points +214%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	19899 Points +178%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	18122 Points +153%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	17074 Points +138%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	7704 Points +8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7085 - 7704, n=3)	7318 Points +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	7166 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average of class Convertible (191 - 169089, n=65, last 2 years)	47023 MB/s +3577%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42553 MB/s +3227%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	42339 MB/s +3210%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	37654 MB/s +2844%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1279 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (638 - 1279, n=3)	1064 MB/s -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	638 MB/s -50%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1088, n=65, last 2 years)	615 MB/s +50%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	588 MB/s +43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	411 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (398 - 412, n=3)	407 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	398 MB/s -3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	319 MB/s -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	296 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Convertible (59 - 13175, n=65, last 2 years)	4451 KRay/s +223%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4400 KRay/s +219%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3857 KRay/s +180%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3565 KRay/s +159%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	1379 KRay/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (204 - 1379, n=3)	903 KRay/s -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	204 KRay/s -85%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44054 MPixel/s +215%
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	42654 MPixel/s +205%
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 Intel Core i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	37197 MPixel/s +166%
Average of class Convertible (2185 - 52599, n=65, last 2 years)	34367 MPixel/s +146%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	13965 MPixel/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (7622 - 14660, n=3)	12082 MPixel/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	7622 MPixel/s -45%

此外，我们还想简单了解一下高通处理器的效率。虽然8cx第三代在单核效率方面能够勉强领先于英特尔和AMD的竞争对手，但这并没有什么帮助，因为单核性能总体上非常低，这对设备的主观性能有影响。

在多核测试中，效率确实很差。我们可以证实这一点，因为尽管性能平平，但该设备在满负荷的情况下从插座中拉出40瓦，因此大约有30瓦被用于处理器。我们不能把这称为真正的高效。

Power Consumption
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	343 Points per Watt +208%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	342 Points per Watt +207%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV512G	240 Points per Watt +115%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	183.7 Points per Watt +65%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	158.6 Points per Watt +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	140.8 Points per Watt +26%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	111.5 Points per Watt
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry M2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z	179.3 Points per Watt +169%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z	173.1 Points per Watt +160%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	66.7 Points per Watt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	61.1 Points per Watt -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV512G	55.9 Points per Watt -16%
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF	48 Points per Watt -28%

系统性能

我们在合成测试方面受到限制，因为即使是跨平台的CrossMark也会反复崩溃。取而代之的是，我们展示了浏览器的基准测试，但这里的性能总体上也非常弱，也反映了主观的性能印象。虽然操作基本流畅，即使是打开设置等简单的任务，也会有一些明显的卡顿，而且设备很快就会被复杂的应用耗费掉。那些熟悉配备M1/M2 SoC的MacBook Air的人例如，期望在这里有类似的性能，肯定会感到失望。

WebXPRT 4: Overall | WebXPRT 3: Overall | Jetstream 2: Total Score | Speedometer 2.0: Result

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	228 Points +255%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	227 Points +254%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	67.2 Points +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	64.2 Points

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	342 Points +304%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	265 Points +213%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Adreno 680, SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	132 Points +56%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Adreno 685, SQ1, 256 GB NVMe	116 Points +37%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	84.7 Points

Jetstream 2 / Total Score
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	240.5 Points +53%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	225.315 Points +43%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	166.424 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	157.5 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Adreno 680, SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	85.4 Points -46%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Adreno 685, SQ1, 256 GB NVMe	76.7 Points -51%

Speedometer 2.0 / Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe	376 runs/min +151%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	261 runs/min +74%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	150 runs/min
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Adreno 680, SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	68.8 runs/min -54%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Adreno 685, SQ1, 256 GB NVMe	61.8 runs/min -59%

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	67017 MB/s +65%
Average of class Convertible (14439 - 95631, n=65, last 2 years)	59388 MB/s +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (40599 - 42710, n=3)	41534 MB/s +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	41293 MB/s +2%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	40599 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	59579 MB/s +80%
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 87812, n=65, last 2 years)	55672 MB/s +69%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	33757 MB/s +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (33013 - 33757, n=3)	33440 MB/s +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	33013 MB/s

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62132 MB/s +25%
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 93451, n=65, last 2 years)	61607 MB/s +24%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	49815 MB/s
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (49100 - 49815, n=3)	49567 MB/s 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	49100 MB/s -1%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	101.2 ns * -892%
Average of class Convertible (10.2 - 260, n=62, last 2 years)	99.9 ns * -879%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	18.8 ns * -84%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 (10.2 - 18.8, n=3)	13.1 ns * -28%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690	10.2 ns *

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

这款紧凑的M.2-2230固态硬盘来自SK海力士，提供256GB的存储容量，其中180GB在首次运行设备后仍可使用。在日常运行中，PCIe 3.0 SSd的传输率还可以，而且足够，特别是考虑到CPU的低性能。此外，即使在较长时间的负载后，传输率也保持不变。你可以找到更多的SSD基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 2968 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1640 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 79.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 187.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 27.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 45.5 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 439 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 714 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Convertible	93.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	79.1 pt
Global Average -3	72.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	59.6 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	53.9 pt
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA ^-8! Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	53.2 pt
Microsoft Surface Pro X ^-8! 256 GB NVMe	45.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Convertible (251 - 4494, n=62, last 2 years)	2565 MB/s +111%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2492 (2463.73^min - 2492.26^max) MB/s +105%
Global Average -3 (201 - 7045, n=1535)	2274 MB/s +87%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	2244 (2051.85^min - 2244.37^max) MB/s +85%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1216 (1188.74^min - 1215.93^max) MB/s
seq write
Average of class Convertible (195.5 - 4440, n=62, last 2 years)	2313 MB/s +58%
Global Average -3 (56.3 - 9307, n=1535)	2299 MB/s +57%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1954 (1874.02^min - 1954.13^max) MB/s +33%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1466 (1421.15^min - 1466.12^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	1353 (1318.27^min - 1353.29^max) MB/s -8%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Convertible (272 - 7152, n=62, last 2 years)	4201 MB/s +60%
Global Average -3 (200 - 16089, n=1535)	3806 MB/s +45%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	3499 (2732.17^min - 3499.31^max) MB/s +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	3095 (2836.41^min - 3095.4^max) MB/s +18%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	2620 (2449.47^min - 2619.97^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Convertible (215 - 5667, n=62, last 2 years)	3008 MB/s +86%
Global Average -3 (57 - 14571, n=1535)	2845 MB/s +76%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2410 (2398.51^min - 2410.26^max) MB/s +49%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	1734 (1475.35^min - 1734.13^max) MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1620 (1607.05^min - 1619.51^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	79.7 (72.36^min - 79.71^max) MB/s +104%
Average of class Convertible (9.13 - 90.3, n=62, last 2 years)	58.9 MB/s +51%
Global Average -3 (5.67 - 361, n=1535)	58.2 MB/s +49%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	39 (33.35^min - 38.96^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	33.1 (32.28^min - 33.05^max) MB/s -15%
4k q1 t1 write
Global Average -3 (13.8 - 429, n=1534)	164.9 MB/s +241%
Average of class Convertible (18.7 - 398, n=62, last 2 years)	151.4 MB/s +213%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	125.6 (122.85^min - 125.61^max) MB/s +160%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	66.7 (63.94^min - 66.65^max) MB/s +38%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	48.4 (39.33^min - 48.35^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Global Average -3 (26 - 6172, n=1534)	1391 MB/s +80%
Average of class Convertible (48.8 - 3881, n=62, last 2 years)	1053 MB/s +36%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	967 (896.77^min - 967.07^max) MB/s +25%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	774 (729.42^min - 773.82^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	665 (643^min - 665.11^max) MB/s -14%
4k q32 t16 write
Global Average -3 (13.1 - 5015, n=1534)	1207 MB/s +225%
Average of class Convertible (17.4 - 3537, n=62, last 2 years)	764 MB/s +106%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	398 (311.17^min - 397.76^max) MB/s +7%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	371 (347.99^min - 371.14^max) MB/s
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	354 (346.58^min - 354.16^max) MB/s -5%

AS SSD
Score Total
Average of class Convertible (125 - 7840, n=61, last 2 years)	3725 Points +119%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2783 Points +64%
Global Average -3 (19 - 13854, n=3211)	2764 Points +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	1993 Points +17%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1699 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	1685 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	1371 Points -19%
Score Read
Average of class Convertible (54 - 2943, n=61, last 2 years)	1304 Points +174%
Global Average -3 (6 - 26650, n=3212)	1083 Points +128%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	867 Points +82%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	841 Points +77%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	717 Points +51%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	639 Points +34%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	476 Points
Score Write
Average of class Convertible (45 - 3586, n=61, last 2 years)	1809 Points +77%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1551 Points +52%
Global Average -3 (4 - 7208, n=3212)	1166 Points +14%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1021 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	739 Points -28%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	672 Points -34%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	453 Points -56%
Seq Read
Average of class Convertible (226 - 5478, n=61, last 2 years)	3323 MB/s +43%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	2802 MB/s +21%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	2376 MB/s +3%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	2318 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	2291.46 MB/s -1%
Global Average -3 (226 - 12763, n=3428)	1840 MB/s -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	1413 MB/s -39%
Seq Write
Average of class Convertible (162.8 - 4335, n=61, last 2 years)	1977 MB/s +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1692 MB/s +37%
Global Average -3 (52.2 - 11316, n=3431)	1234 MB/s 0%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	1233 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	998.17 MB/s -19%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	881 MB/s -29%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	393 MB/s -68%
4K Read
Average of class Convertible (7.89 - 82.4, n=61, last 2 years)	55.7 MB/s +63%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	51.17 MB/s +50%
Global Average -3 (6.08 - 314, n=3421)	41.1 MB/s +20%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	36.3 MB/s +6%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	34.2 MB/s
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	25.86 MB/s -24%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	21.09 MB/s -38%
4K Write
Average of class Convertible (14 - 347, n=61, last 2 years)	163.2 MB/s +146%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	147.09 MB/s +122%
Global Average -3 (13.5 - 512, n=3421)	108.4 MB/s +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	71.41 MB/s +8%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	66.4 MB/s
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	55.6 MB/s -16%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	49.85 MB/s -25%
4K-64 Read
Average of class Convertible (19.6 - 2371, n=61, last 2 years)	916 MB/s +336%
Global Average -3 (13.1 - 3475, n=3420)	797 MB/s +280%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	601.19 MB/s +186%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	509.42 MB/s +143%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	477 MB/s +127%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	453.2 MB/s +116%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	210 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Average of class Convertible (15 - 3015, n=61, last 2 years)	1448 MB/s +74%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	1234.89 MB/s +48%
Global Average -3 (13.7 - 5909, n=3418)	873 MB/s +5%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	832 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	568.01 MB/s -32%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	529 MB/s -36%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	363.5 MB/s -56%
Access Time Read
Global Average -3 (0.012 - 33, n=3352)	0.657 ms * -960%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	0.148 ms * -139%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	0.087 ms * -40%
Average of class Convertible (0.021 - 0.244, n=60, last 2 years)	0.08413 ms * -36%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	0.062 ms *
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.05 ms * +19%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	0 ms * +100%
Access Time Write
Global Average -3 (0.011 - 60.7, n=3394)	0.56 ms * -849%
Average of class Convertible (0.017 - 0.865, n=61, last 2 years)	0.113 ms * -92%
Microsoft Surface Pro X 256 GB NVMe	0.076 ms * -29%
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	0.07 ms * -19%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM	0.059 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	0.052 ms * +12%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	0.03 ms * +49%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM: Ø2746 (2540.12-2818.15)

图形卡

图形计算由集成的阿德雷诺-690 GPU处理器，它能够在日常操作中毫无问题地再现高分辨率的视频。从纯粹的性能来看，我们看到与旧的Adreno 680相比，有大约25%的优势。 Adreno 680，但尘封已久的老式Iris Xe Graphics G7的英特尔CPU仍然明显更强大。的 M2 GPU目前iPad Pro 12.9的M2 GPU在一个完全不同的联盟中发挥着作用。

Surface Pro 9 ARM几乎不适合游戏，因为许多常规游戏几乎无法运行或根本无法启动。相反，你应该把自己限制在Windows商店的非常简单的游戏上（如纸牌游戏、象棋或麻将）。但至少Adreno 690的图形性能在电池运行以及较长时间的负载下保持稳定。你可以找到更多的GPU基准测试这里.

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Convertible (471 - 40768, n=65, last 2 years)	7870 Points +172%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	6251 Points +116%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	2979 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 (2898 - 2979, n=3)	2930 Points +1%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	2898 Points
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Qualcomm Adreno 680, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G	2278 Points -21%
Microsoft Surface Pro X Qualcomm Adreno 685, Microsoft SQ1	1927 Points -34%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Convertible (2965 - 154219, n=50, last 2 years)	32507 Points +65%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	19647 Points
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 (13768 - 19647, n=2)	16708 Points -15%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	13768 Points -30%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Convertible (365 - 29684, n=65, last 2 years)	5902 Points +95%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	5517 Points +82%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3028 Points
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 (2837 - 3028, n=2)	2933 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	2837 Points -6%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6909 Points +125%
Average of class Convertible (2276 - 15020, n=11, last 2 years)	4976 Points +62%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	3692 Points +20%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3067 Points
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 ()	3067 Points 0%
Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2	6919 Points +127%
Average of class Convertible (2191 - 15282, n=8, last 2 years)	5172 Points +70%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1255U	3812 Points +25%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Adreno 690, Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3	3045 Points
Average Qualcomm Adreno 690 ()	3045 Points 0%

3DMark 11 Performance		3077 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		8602 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		2911 points
Help

... in comparison

	low	med.	high	ultra
The Witcher 3 (2015)	35
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	57.1	54.5	47	40.7
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	20.7	18	16.3

排放和电源管理

噪声水平

与对比组中的其他ARM设备一样，被动冷却当然是一个优势，因为可转换装置的运行始终保持完全安静。我们也没有发现任何其他电子噪音。

温度

在日常操作中，这台敞篷车实际上一点也不发热。只有当你真正提高对处理器的要求时，热量才会变得明显，由于金属外壳有时甚至在手握敞篷车时感到不舒服的温度。例如，我们测量到背部的表面温度高达44℃（111°F）。我们不得不问，为什么ARM处理器在这里以如此高的功率运行。

Max. Load

Idle


39.9 °C	40 °C	39.8 °C
39 °C	40.8 °C	38.1 °C
36.1 °C	36.4 °C	33.2 °C

Maximum: 40.8 °C
Average: 38.1 °C


41.2 °C	43.4 °C	43 °C
39.7 °C	43.3 °C	42.9 °C
37.2 °C	38.9 °C	39.4 °C

Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 41 °C

Power Supply (max.) 37.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.2 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.4 °C / 97.5 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (-8.3 °C / -14.9 F).

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Microsoft Surface Pro X Microsoft SQ1, Qualcomm Adreno 685	Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 690	HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 680	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Heat		-9%	-9%	-32%	3%	-11%
Maximum Upper Side *	40.8	44.6 -9%	41.8 -2%	59 -45%	34.3 16%	36.9 10%
Maximum Bottom *	43.4	45.9 -6%	45.7 -5%	64.4 -48%	35.4 18%	37.6 13%
Idle Upper Side *	23.2	24.8 -7%	26.3 -13%	26.5 -14%	25.7 -11%	31.9 -38%
Idle Bottom *	22.6	25.3 -12%	25.8 -14%	26.8 -19%	25.1 -11%	29.4 -30%

* ... smaller is better

消耗功率

对于一个ARM设备来说，空闲测量值总体上略高，但这可能是由于一个错误造成的。即使我们能够将显示器的120赫兹模式切换到60赫兹，也没有任何影响（显示器也没有像通常切换时那样短暂变黑）。在负载情况下，该设备从插座上拉出的最大功率为40瓦，因此它充分利用了附带的39瓦充电器。我们更希望它能包括英特尔版本的60瓦充电器，它还提供一个额外的USB-A连接用于充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.31 / 0.41 Watt
Idle	2.8 / 6.8 / 8.1 Watt
Load	23.8 / 40.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3	Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV	Microsoft Surface Pro X Adreno 685, SQ1, 256 GB NVMe	Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE Adreno 690, SD 8cx Gen 3, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ	HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA Adreno 680, SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G	Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
Power Consumption		-67%	-0%	11%	36%	1%
Idle Minimum *	2.8	5.1 -82%	3.2 -14%	2.6 7%	2.3 18%	2.54 9%
Idle Average *	6.8	9.8 -44%	8.5 -25%	4.9 28%	3.7 46%	11.24 -65%
Idle Maximum *	8.1	11.3 -40%	9.6 -19%	5.2 36%	5.6 31%	11.48 -42%
Load Average *	23.8	47.5 -100%	19.8 17%	21.5 10%	13 45%	12.97 46%
Load Maximum *	40.2	68.5 -70%	24.7 39%	49.8 -24%	25 38%	16.6 59%
Witcher 3 ultra *		36

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø39.9 (39.4-40.2)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.9 (3.68-4.44)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø37.9 (35.2-40.4)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø33.2 (31.3-35.2)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø9.11 (7.42-15.3)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø32 (29.1-33.8)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø17 (12.3-19.2)

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.6 (2.72-4.61)

电池寿命

电池寿命也受到120赫兹错误的影响，总体上变得有点短。尽管英特尔型号的Surface Pro 9被超越了，但其背后的缺点是 ThinkPad X13s的劣势仍然显著。我们在150cd/m²亮度下的WLAN测试中测得10小时，而在全屏亮度下只有约6小时。在负载下，它可以持续140分钟。在60-Hz模式下，应该可以有更长的电池寿命。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)		10h 03min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 110)		6h 07min

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680, 46 Wh	874 min +45%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 49.5 Wh	848 min +41%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 40.88 Wh	671 min +11%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 47.7 Wh	603 min
Average of class Convertible (329 - 876, n=62, last 2 years)	563 min -7%
Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685, 38.2 Wh	469 min -22%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh	451 min -25%
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
HP EliteBook Folio 13.5-3G2L2EA SD 8cx Gen 2 5G, Adreno 680, 46 Wh	757 min +106%
Lenovo ThinkPad X13s Gen 1 21BX000QGE SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 49.5 Wh	614 min +67%
Average of class Convertible (300 - 566, n=20, last 2 years)	415 min +13%
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM SD 8cx Gen 3, Adreno 690, 47.7 Wh	367 min
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 47.7 Wh	314 min -14%
Microsoft Surface Pro X SQ1, Adreno 685, 38.2 Wh	286 min -22%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳

+ 良好的显示效果与120-Hz模式

+ 5G & Wi-Fi 6E

+ 可更换的SSD

+ 可选的带集成笔的键盘盖

Cons

- 负载下和游戏中机箱温度高

- 电池寿命相对较短

- 对64位应用程序的兼容性有限

- 性能明显弱于英特尔型号

- 3.5毫米的音频被移除

- 没有SD卡读卡器

- 只有一年的保修期

评语--Surface Pro 9的ARM型号没有得到推荐

与英特尔版本相比，微软Surface Pro 9的ARM型号有两个明显的优势英特尔版本.第一个优势是被动冷却，确保了可折叠电脑的无声运行。另一方面，我们也不得不说，整体性能处于较低水平。第二个优势是集成了5G调制解调器，但我们也发现，微软迫使客户在这里获得ARM版本，而不是像过去那样提供带有LTE/5G的英特尔型号，这是非常不幸的。

我们认为，现在在Surface Pro 9的标签下提供ARM型号是一个错误。微软以此表明产品水平相似，但在日常操作中根本不是这样的（尽管与Core-i5机型相比价格更高）。

总的来说，配备ARM处理器的Surface Pro肯定有很好的理由存在，而且由于改进了64位模拟，现在可以运行的应用程序明显增多。然而，它仍然不是配备X86处理器的机型的完全替代品。在日常操作中，该设备根本没有那么快，即使在简单的任务中，也会有一些小的停顿或延迟。那些期待采用ARM SoC的MacBook的性能的人 Apple 配备ARM SoC的MacBook的人肯定会在这里感到失望。在这种情况下，我们还认为，微软现在将ARM版本简单地作为Surface Pro 9提供的决定是有问题的。此外，如果客户想要一个集成的LTE/5G调制解调器，就不得不购买ARM型号。

尽管改进了对64位应用程序的兼容性，但配备ARM处理器的Surface Pro 9仍然不是一个成熟的Windows设备，因为不是所有的应用程序都能兼容。它不能满足用户与Surface "Pro "标签连接的要求。

ARM型号还提供了一个稳定的外壳，一个良好的显示屏和良好的扬声器。仅从这一点来看，它是一个很好的设备，但考虑到高昂的价格，与英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9相比，我们很难推荐ARM机型。英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9.当然，采用高通SoC的SP9也适用于简单的任务，但这也适用于 Apple iPad Pro 12.9它的M2 SoC几乎在所有领域都有优势。

价格和可用性

Surface Pro 9 ARM可以从微软商店购买，起价1169.99美元。，包括键盘和输入笔。亚马逊列出的型号从1299.99美元起。

Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM - 2023-03-04 03/04/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

91 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

87%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

59 / 75 → 78%

Weight

77 / 20-75 → 100%

Battery

88%

Display

90%

Games Performance

38 / 78 → 48%

Application Performance

54 / 85 → 64%

Temperature

81%

Noise

100%

Audio

81 / 91 → 89%

Camera

63 / 85 → 74%

Average

77%

87%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 508 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 387730 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 微软Surface Pro 9 ARM评测--高端ARM敞篷车令人失望

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-03- 6 (Update: 2023-03- 6)

微软Surface Pro 9 ARM评测--高端ARM敞篷车令人失望

潜在的竞争对手比较

与英特尔版本的Surface Pro 9的区别

尺寸比较

性能--微软SQ3别名骁龙8cx第三代

测试条件

处理器 - 高通8cx第三代

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

排放和电源管理

噪声水平

温度

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption with External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语--Surface Pro 9的ARM型号没有得到推荐

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare