微软 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 评测--搭载骁龙 X Elite 的高端二合一设备
如今,Surface Pro 已经发展到了第 11 代,微软更新了其高端的 Surface Pro 2 合 1,为其配备了高通骁龙 X SoC。说起来,Surface Pro 搭载 ARM 处理器并不是什么新鲜事,因为自 Surface Pro 9 以来,英特尔和 ARM 型号一直并行销售。现在情况不再是这样了,因为新的 Surface Pro Copilot+ 没有英特尔芯片。与旧款 旧的 ARM 机型不过,新的骁龙 X 机型不能采用被动冷却方式。
新款 Surface Pro Copilot+ 有两个基本型号。基本版售价 1199 美元,配备了 骁龙 X PlusIPS 面板、16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。1499 美元起,我们有速度更快的 骁龙 X 精英版(X1E-80-100),配备高分辨率 OLED 触摸屏以及相同的内存和存储规格,即 16 GB 内存和 512 GB 固态硬盘。1699 美元可获得更大的 1 TB SSD,2099 美元可获得 32 GB 内存,换句话说,内存是原来的两倍。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.5 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 870 g | 9.3 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
85.7 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Minisforum V3 R7 8840U, Radeon 780M | 928 g | 9.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.2 % | v7 (old) | 10/2023 | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 1.3 kg | 18.7 mm | 13.40" | 2560x1600 | |
88.3 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
90.5 % | v7 (old) | 04/2024 | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.8 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core | 1.7 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们更新了评级系统,这意味着第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请参见 这里.
外壳 - Surface Pro 采用熟悉的金属外壳
微软没有改变 Surface Pro 的外壳。它再次采用了非常高级和稳定的金属外壳。银色外壳与黑色屏幕(包括边框)的组合形成了很好的对比。此外,这款二合一设备还有黑色、灰米色或宝石蓝三种颜色可供选择。
2 合 1 的质量仍然非常好,稳定性也非常突出。由于采用的是 OLED 面板(IPS 版本也不存在此类问题),因此没有吱吱作响的声音,图像瑕疵也不是问题。我们对内置脚架仍不完全满意。一方面,它的材料非常薄,因此有可能稍微弯曲。此外,如果把二合一手机放在膝盖上,薄薄的边缘很快就会变得令人讨厌。此外,铰链仍然有些松弛,但这一直是 Surface Pro 的问题所在。
平板电脑本身重 870 克,厚度为 9.3 毫米。与带有固定键盘的二合一设备相比,这当然是一个优势。不过,如果再加上一个键盘(约 350 克),这一优势就不再明显了。体积小巧的 39 瓦 PSU 重 213 克。
功能 - 配备 USB 4 的 ARM Surface
在接口方面,左侧有两个 USB-C 接口(4.0),右侧是我们熟悉的 Surface Connect 接口,通过该接口可以对二合一设备进行标准充电(当然也可以通过 USB-C 接口充电)。底座上的接口可以安装选配的键盘盖。Surface Pro 不带 SD 读卡器。
同时,我们还使用 KVM 切换器将 Surface Pro 与显示器连接起来,并能顺利使用所连接的输入和 USB 设备。
交流
作为标准配置,高通 SoC 提供包括蓝牙 5.4 在内的现代 WiFi 7 模块(Fast Connect 7800)。与华硕参考路由器配对后,传输速度非常高且稳定。在日常情况下,信号质量没有任何问题。据微软称,新款 Surface Pro 的 5G 型号将于今年晚些时候上市。
Networking | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Minisforum V3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
网络摄像头
Surface Pro 一直配备有出色的摄像头,第 11 代也不例外。前置摄像头为 1220 万像素,可拍摄 4:3 的图像(4,032 x 3,024 像素)或 16:9 的 830 万像素快照(3,840 x 2,160 像素)。录制视频的最高分辨率为 1440p,每秒 30 帧。
后置 1050 万像素摄像头,最大分辨率为 3,736 x 2,802 像素,纵横比为 4:3,或 16:9,930 万像素图像,分辨率为 4,046 x 2,286 像素。视频拍摄最高可达 4K,每秒 30 帧。两个摄像头的质量都非常好,大大优于目前所有其他笔记本电脑。图像非常清晰,色彩也非常准确。Surface Pro Copilot+ 网络摄像头还可以使用著名的 Studio Effects。
维护
机身后部还有一个小盖子,通过它可以非常方便地访问和交换已安装的 M.2 2230 SSD。要访问其他组件,则必须取下粘合的显示屏。此外,如有必要,还可以更换螺丝固定的电池。同样,风扇也可以进行清洁,不过这个过程需要花费不少力气。
保修
制造商提供 12 个月的保修服务,德国用户可享受两年的法定保修服务。在美国,制造商以 Microsoft Complete 的名义提供两年、三年或四年的延长保修(额外收取 149 美元、219 美元或 249 美元),其中包括意外损坏保修。 但不包括现场服务,设备必须送至制造商处。
输入设备 - 全新 Surface Pro 柔性键盘
新款 Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ 在销售时还附带键盘盖或触控笔,但我们的评测设备都没有附带。这意味着你只能使用功能出色的电容式触摸屏。微软继续提供我们熟悉的各种颜色的 Surface Pro 键盘和 Slim Pen,我们测试了这两款产品与旧款 Surface Pro 9 的组合。
据说新的 Surface Pro Flex 键盘更加稳定,而且无需与 Surface Pro 进行机械连接即可使用。但微软对此的要求也很高,因为键盘(黑色或淡蓝色)和 Slim Pen 套装的价格高达 449 美元。
显示屏 - 120 Hz OLED
由于我们使用的是光面 13 英寸触摸屏(康宁大猩猩 5 号玻璃),分辨率为 2,880 x 1,920 像素,纵横比为 3:2,因此这两款面板具有许多共同的特性。IPS 面板的亮度为 600 尼特,几乎与我们的 OLED 面板评测设备的 SDR 亮度相当。根据制造商的说法,这两种面板都可以单独校准,亮度和色温都可以通过传感器适应环境。从根本上说,三星 OLED 面板的主观图像质量非常好,机芯也受益于频率的提高(120 Hz),但在明亮区域会有轻微的可见光栅效应。
我们的测量结果表明,SDR 的最大亮度为 580 cd/m²,这意味着制造商未能达到预期目标。尽管如此,这与旧型号(约 450 cd/m²)相比还是有了显著提高。除了黑阶较低之外,OLED 面板还具有典型的出色对比度。在 HDR 模式下,我们在小幅图像上测得的对比度高达 918 cd/m²,在几乎全白的图像上测得的对比度为 770 cd/m²。这意味着 Surface Pro 比目前许多其他 OLED 设备更有优势,后者在 SDR 模式下通常只能达到 400 尼特(HDR:最高 650 尼特)。不过,Windows HDR 模式仍然只能手动激活。OLED 面板的响应速度非常快,而且不存在光线或屏幕出血的技术问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 578 cd/m²
Contrast: 14500:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 0.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ ATNA30DW01-1, OLED, 2880x1920, 13" | Minisforum V3 BOE, NE140QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV TL134ADXP01-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U LP129WT2-SPA6, IPS, 2880x1920, 13" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | -3% | -10% | 4% | 3% | -20% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.9 | 97.7 -1% | 95.1 -4% | 80.6 -19% | 99.8 1% | 99.9 1% | 65.6 -34% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.8 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 97.7 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.5 | 85.4 -5% | 84.4 -6% | 80.1 -11% | 97.3 9% | 96.6 8% | 67.7 -24% |
Response Times | -2152% | -1202% | -12282% | -91% | -40% | -360% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.32 ? | 10 ? -3025% | 4.79 ? -1397% | 59.6 ? -18525% | 0.8 ? -150% | 0.49 ? -53% | 13 ? -3963% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.58 ? | 8 ? -1279% | 6.42 ? -1007% | 35.6 ? -6038% | 1 ? -72% | 0.67 ? -16% | 19.4 ? -3245% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 240.5 ? -50% | 240 ? -50% | 29896 ? 6128% | |||
Screen | -323% | -314% | -199% | -206% | -47% | -171% | |
Brightness middle | 580 | 512 -12% | 473 -18% | 501.4 -14% | 371.6 -36% | 387 -33% | 455 -22% |
Brightness | 581 | 495 -15% | 445 -23% | 491 -15% | 373 -36% | 392 -33% | 453 -22% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 91 -8% | 89 -10% | 88 -11% | 99 0% | 98 -1% | 94 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.04 | 0.48 -1100% | 0.39 -875% | 0.32 -700% | 0.38 -850% | ||
Contrast | 14500 | 1067 -93% | 1213 -92% | 1567 -89% | 1197 -92% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 4.32 -517% | 3.3 -371% | 2.52 -260% | 4.91 -601% | 1 -43% | 1.7 -143% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 7.04 -235% | 8.93 -325% | 4.87 -132% | 8.33 -297% | 1.9 10% | 3.8 -81% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.6 | 4.22 -603% | 5.4 -800% | 2.8 -367% | 2.2 -267% | 1.7 -183% | 1.5 -150% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.31 95% | 2.11 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6484 100% | 6770 96% | 7540 86% | 6270 104% | 6120 106% | 6325 103% | 6761 96% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.17 | 1.09 | 0.45 | 1.59 | 1.5 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -826% /
-530% | -506% /
-379% | -4164% /
-2014% | -98% /
-125% | -28% /
-33% | -184% /
-179% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对面板进行了分析,作为标准配置,我们选择了涵盖 P3 色彩空间的Vivid配置文件。此外,还有一个 sRGB 配置文件,令人欣慰的是,这两个配置文件都校准得非常好,因为既没有色调,也没有个别颜色超过重要的目标值 3。由于我们的校准软件(i1 Profiler)目前与 ARM 版本的 Windows 不兼容,因此我们无法对显示器进行校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.58 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.29 ms rise | |
↘ 0.29 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.17 ms rise | |
↘ 0.15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 25 % | ≤ 69 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 69 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17212 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
新 Surface Pro 的 OLED 版本存在 PWM 闪烁。我们在最大亮度下没有检测到任何闪烁,但在 70% 到 99% 的亮度范围内,我们记录到频率为 120 Hz 的直流调光,这可能比传统的 PWM 更具破坏性。在频率为 480 Hz、亮度值为 69 % 或更低时,会出现这种情况。因此,对 PWM 闪烁敏感的用户最好选择 IPS 版本的 Surface Pro Copilot+。
Surface Pro 的屏幕反光很强,在室内也会出现恼人的反光。虽然亮度的提高和 OLED 面板的对比度有一点帮助,但在晴天或非常明亮的日子里,仍然很难在户外舒适地工作。除了从广角观看时会有轻微的蓝色色调(OLED 的典型特征)外,在视角稳定性方面没有任何限制。
性能 - 配备双核涡轮增压技术的 Snapdragon X Elite
全新 Surface Pro Copilot+ 的 IPS 机型配备了 骁龙 X Plus(X1P-64-100),而 OLED 版则始终使用功能更强大的 骁龙 X Elite(X1E-80-100),其中包括双核涡轮增压处理器。内存容量为 16 或 32 GB,采用快速 LPDDR5x-8448 内存。
我们尝试进行了一系列常规测试,但有些程序与 ARM 版 Windows 存在兼容性问题。在任务管理器的 "详细信息"部分,您还会看到手头的应用程序是 ARM 版本还是模拟版本。
测试条件
Surfaces 设备不提供自己的能源配置文件,而只提供 Windows 配置文件。不过,与 Windows 笔记本电脑相比,微软设备的这些配置文件名称不同。除了 "最佳性能"外,还有 "更佳性能 "(相当于 "平衡")和 "推荐"(相当于 "最佳能效")。我们使用 "最佳性能"进行了以下基准测试。新款 Surface Pro 11 没有官方的 TDP 数据,但根据我们的能耗测量结果,我们假定它的能耗水平在 23 瓦到最高 30 瓦之间。
处理器 - Snapdragon X1E-80-100
我们的评测设备配备了 骁龙 X Elite X1E-80-100该处理器提供 12 个主频为 3.4 GHz 的内核和一个主频为 4.0 GHz 的双核涡轮增压处理器。更多技术细节以及 ARM 处理器的能效测量结果请参阅 我们的分析文章.
当然,最重要的是本地 Geekbench 和 Cinebench 2024 基准测试,但我们也在测试过程中进行了其他 CPU 测试,以了解模拟应用程序的性能。多核性能取决于(与 AMD 和英特尔设备一样)功耗限制,Surface Pro 的 X1E-80-100 功耗比 Vivobook S 15及其 X1E-78-100.不过,在单核测试中,二合一设备得益于双核涡轮增压技术,性能提高了约 15%。目前的 AMD Ryzen 7 8840U在单核和多核测试中也明显落于下风。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
与配备 英特尔酷睿 i7-1255U在模拟测试中的性能更胜一筹,而采用 骁龙 8cx Gen3与新的骁龙 X Elite 相比完全没有胜算。在连续负载情况下,CPU 性能并不完全稳定,不过在 Cinebench 2024 等较长时间测试中,只运行一次就能明显看出这一点。在第二次运行时,R15 短测试已经显示出明显的下降,降幅约为 20%。在电池模式下,性能没有额外下降。
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average of class Tablet (795 - 893, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (621 - 927, n=5) | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (122 - 123, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (109 - 123, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Minisforum V3 |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (14234 - 14646, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=63, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2751 - 2845, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=63, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (6772 - 10028, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (3066 - 9927, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1273 - 1321, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (559 - 1559, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2539 - 3802, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (1175 - 3640, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (470 - 495, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (205 - 596, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1476 - 2249, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (433 - 2249, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (230 - 248, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Tablet (119 - 248, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average of class Tablet (351 - 1080, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (339 - 510, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (34299 - 45905, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (12470 - 44404, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (5242 - 5359, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Tablet (3915 - 5359, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (4.74 - 7.23, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.68 - 9.13, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average of class Tablet (51.9 - 117.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (51.7 - 98.5, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Asus Vivobook S 15 OLED Snapdragon | |
Average of class Tablet (0.532 - 1.012, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (0.63 - 0.67, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | |
Average of class Tablet | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2184 - 7339, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (2184 - 7637, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (5687 - 26391, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (5315 - 35296, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2607 - 2949, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Tablet (785 - 2607, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (68253 - 69762, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (27210 - 69762, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average of class Tablet (1161 - 3974, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (1521 - 2357, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (10117 - 15669, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (6842 - 16614, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (39956 - 71089, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (1275 - 71089, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (398 - 802, n=5) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (229 - 802, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (2581 - 4044, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average of class Tablet (1127 - 3718, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (28474 - 38707, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average of class Tablet (14660 - 38707, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
系统性能
在实际使用中,配备 Snapdragon 处理器的 Surface Pro 响应速度非常快,虽然我们在系统稳定性方面没有遇到任何问题,但并不是每个应用程序都能正常运行。如果你不是只打算使用日常应用程序(办公、浏览器、视频流),那么你应该提前做一些研究,以避免不愉快的意外。
在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中,Surface Pro Copilot+ 的表现明显优于最近评测的 Vivobook S 15在跨系统 CrossMark 测试中,Surface Pro Copilot+ 的表现明显优于最近评测的 Vivobook S 15,但仍略逊于直接竞争对手。在浏览器测试中,骁龙 2 合 1 遥遥领先于竞争对手。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1356 - 1443, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1271 - 1375, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (185 - 1797, n=63, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1492 - 1537, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (151 - 2350, n=63, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (1237 - 1401, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Average of class Tablet (205 - 1401, n=63, last 2 years) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (430 - 455, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (295 - 324, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS (391 - 422, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (44795 - 63495, n=5) | |
Average of class Tablet (32539 - 68769, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (58855 - 125604, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Tablet (31342 - 124555, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average of class Tablet (33224 - 62397, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (37270 - 45265, n=5) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Dell Latitude 9450 2-in-1 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 360 | |
Minisforum V3 | |
Asus ROG Flow X13 GV302XV | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, i7-1255U | |
Average of class Tablet (7.4 - 110, n=5, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 9, ARM | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 (7.4 - 8.8, n=5) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
由于 LatencyMon 应用程序无法在 ARM 系统上启动,我们无法进行标准的延迟测试。在播放 4K YouTube 视频时,至少没有出现丢帧问题。
大容量存储器
这款紧凑型 M.2 2230 固态硬盘来自三星(PM9B1),存储容量为 1 TB,初始启动后可用容量为 890 GB。这是一款中级 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘,最大传输速度约为 3.5 GB/s。虽然可以达到更高的速度,但其性能足以满足日常使用。此外,即使在长时间负载后,传输速度也能保持稳定。其他固态硬盘基准测试可参见 这里.