Notebookcheck

惠普 Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测

Sebastian Bade (translated by Kangfei Zheng), 07/18/2017
Gaming Geforce Kaby Lake Notebook Windows

跟新了,有人在吗?这一更新花费了一些时间。惠普已为其15英寸机型的Omen 系列做了性能提升。一个Kaby Lake 中央处理器和Pascal NVIDIA图形处理器已经被添加—— 但该机值得期待吗?

HP Omen 15-ax213ng (Omen Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 2.8 GHz
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) - 4096 MB, Core: 1493 MHz, Memory: 7000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 382.05, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, 2 of 2 slots in use, Dual Channel, max. 16 GB
Display
15.6 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel 141 PPI, AU Optronics AUO41ED, IPS, 全高清, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB 
, M.2 SSD Type 2280 + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm, 2.5 inch
Soundcard
Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Sunrise Point-LP PCH - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio combo, Card Reader: SD,SDHC,SDXC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor
Networking
Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n/ac), Bluetooth 4.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 24.5 x 382 x 253
Battery
63.3 Wh Lithium-Ion, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0 (Bang & Olufsen Audio), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Power supply: 150 Watt, Accessories: QuickStart guide, other informational material, Programs: Microsoft Office 365 Trial, various tools from manufacturer, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.253 kg, Power Supply: 449 g
Price
1510 EUR

 

HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t
HP Omen 15t

Size Comparison

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus FX502VM-AS73
78.8 MB/s ∼100% +5%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
75 MB/s ∼95% 0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
75 MB/s ∼95%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
74.74 MB/s ∼95% 0%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
23.2 MB/s ∼29% -69%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
22.2 MB/s ∼28% -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
89.74 MB/s ∼100% +3%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
87 MB/s ∼97%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
86.9 MB/s ∼97% 0%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
86 MB/s ∼96% -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
27.6 MB/s ∼31% -68%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
27.2 MB/s ∼30% -69%
Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
686 MBit/s ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
541 MBit/s ∼79% -21%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼78% -22%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
307 MBit/s ∼45% -55%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
246 MBit/s ∼36% -64%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
653 MBit/s ∼100% +23%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
533 MBit/s ∼82%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
513 MBit/s ∼79% -4%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (jseb)
306 MBit/s ∼47% -43%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Realtek 8821AE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC
282 MBit/s ∼43% -47%
240
cd/m²
237
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
219
cd/m²
230
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
217
cd/m²
212
cd/m²
231
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 240 cd/m² Average: 227.7 cd/m² Minimum: 13 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 230 cd/m²
Contrast: 1095:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.01 | - Ø
ΔE Greyscale 3.18 | - Ø
58% sRGB (Argyll) 37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.52
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
AU Optronics AUO41ED, 1920x1080, 15.6
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
LGD0519, 1920x1080, 15.6
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, 1920x1080, 15.6
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
AU Optronics AUO38ED B156HTN 28H80, 1920x1080, 15.6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
LP156WF6-SPK3, 1920x1080, 15.6
Asus FX502VM-AS73
1920x1080, 15.6
Response Times
-21%
33%
-8%
-35%
26%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 (20.4, 21.6)
55 (22, 33)
-31%
22 (10, 12)
48%
36 (17, 19)
14%
58.8 (33.6, 25.2)
-40%
28.4 (11.2, 17.2)
32%
Response Time Black / White *
28 (16.4, 11.6)
31 (8, 23)
-11%
23 (13, 10)
18%
36 (19, 17)
-29%
36 (23.6, 12.4)
-29%
22.4 (6, 16.4)
20%
PWM Frequency
21550 (99)
Screen
-27%
-17%
-96%
-31%
-36%
Brightness
228
203
-11%
257
13%
235
3%
244
7%
205
-10%
Brightness Distribution
88
79
-10%
85
-3%
75
-15%
88
0%
92
5%
Black Level *
0.21
0.28
-33%
0.32
-52%
0.55
-162%
0.35
-67%
0.69
-229%
Contrast
1095
764
-30%
878
-20%
447
-59%
683
-38%
304
-72%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
4.01
6.04
-51%
5.16
-29%
10.97
-174%
7.3
-82%
4.7
-17%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
3.18
5.91
-86%
4.57
-44%
14.25
-348%
4.9
-54%
1.8
43%
Gamma
2.52 95%
2.44 98%
2.59 93%
1.83 131%
2.19 110%
2.23 108%
CCT
6814 95%
7362 88%
6931 94%
11200 58%
7332 89%
6975 93%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
38
3%
37
0%
35
-5%
35
-5%
36.2
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
60
3%
58
0%
55
-5%
55
-5%
56.6
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-24% / -26%
8% / -7%
-52% / -78%
-33% / -31%
-5% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.4 ms rise
↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (26.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 20.4 ms rise
↘ 21.6 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.9 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (43 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 58 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 5559 (minimum: 43 - maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z (Render test)
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
DPC latencies
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility
Intel Extreme Tuning Utility (benchmark)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320330340350360370380390400410420430440450460470480490500510520530540550560570580590600610620630640650660670680690700710720730740Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
162 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
161 Points ∼99%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼98% -1%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
159 Points ∼98% -1%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
151 Points ∼93% -6%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
147 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
140 Points ∼86% -13%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
742 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
736 Points ∼99%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
725 Points ∼98% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
724 Points ∼98% -2%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
719 Points ∼97% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
678 Points ∼91% -8%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
652 Points ∼88% -11%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.82 Points ∼100%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.77 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.72 Points ∼95% -5%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
1.68 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1.67 Points ∼92% -8%
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.18 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
8.16 Points ∼100%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.99 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
7.45 Points ∼91% -9%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
7.12 Points ∼87% -13%
JetStream 1.1 - 1.1 Total Score
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.93 Points ∼100%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
266.34 Points ∼100% 0%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
261.28 Points ∼98% -2%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
257.14 Points ∼96% -4%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
218.49 Points ∼82% -18%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
39851 Points ∼100% +10%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
38128 Points ∼96% +5%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
36293 Points ∼91%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
33799 Points ∼85% -7%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
1069.1 ms * ∼100% -13%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
993.7 ms * ∼93% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
965.2 ms * ∼90% -2%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
946.5 ms * ∼89% -0%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
945.3 ms * ∼88%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10
Cinebench R10
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R11.5
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Jetstream 1.1
Jetstream 1.1
Octane V2
Octane V2
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
6842 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
28665 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
7432 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.82 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
8.16 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
66.88 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
161 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
90.06 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
736 Points
Help
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Home
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Creative
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 8 Work
PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 8
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5268 Points ∼100% +68%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
5068 Points ∼96% +61%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
5003 Points ∼95% +59%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
4442 Points ∼84% +41%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
3141 Points ∼60%
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
2722 Points ∼52% -13%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
7220 Points ∼100% +34%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
5402 Points ∼75%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
5318 Points ∼74% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
4992 Points ∼69% -8%
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4765 Points ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
4165 Points ∼87%
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
4141 Points ∼87% -1%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
3946 Points ∼83% -5%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
3850 Points ∼81% -8%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3565 Points ∼75% -14%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4165 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5402 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3141 points
Help
AS SSD
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (SSD)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (SSD)
ATTO
ATTO
CrystalDiskInfo (SSD)
CrystalDiskInfo (SSD)
HD Tune
HD Tune
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (HDD)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 (HDD)
CrystalDiskInfo (HDD)
CrystalDiskInfo (HDD)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
Intel SSDSCKKF256H6
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Asus FX502VM-AS73
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-65%
-97%
-60%
-6%
-67%
10%
Write 4k QD32
557.2
168
-70%
0.893
-100%
255.1
-54%
392.9
-29%
99.74
-82%
526.9
-5%
Read 4k QD32
650.4
276.8
-57%
0.718
-100%
279.6
-57%
457.7
-30%
369.9
-43%
631.7
-3%
Write 4k
176.9
81.38
-54%
0.846
-100%
85.44
-52%
146.4
-17%
70.91
-60%
158.2
-11%
Read 4k
62.63
33.14
-47%
0.327
-99%
27.11
-57%
58.93
-6%
29.36
-53%
54.2
-13%
Write 512
807.1
169.6
-79%
28.31
-96%
304
-62%
822
2%
137.8
-83%
1531
90%
Read 512
805.9
327.6
-59%
28.33
-96%
338.9
-58%
785.8
-2%
343.5
-57%
499.7
-38%
Write Seq
1208
169.2
-86%
100.6
-92%
422.8
-65%
1202
0%
138.2
-89%
1621
34%
Read Seq
1657
475.7
-71%
101.5
-94%
485.8
-71%
2170
31%
502.5
-70%
2141
29%
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
Sequential Read: 1657 MB/s
Sequential Write: 1208 MB/s
512K Read: 805.9 MB/s
512K Write: 807.1 MB/s
4K Read: 62.63 MB/s
4K Write: 176.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 650.4 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 557.2 MB/s
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Ice Storm Extreme
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Cloud Gate
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver
3DMark Sky Diver (Stress test)
3DMark Sky Diver (Stress test)
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Fire Strike Ultra
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy (Stress test)
3DMark Time Spy (Stress test)
3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
11633 Points ∼100% +49%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7821 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7791 Points ∼67% 0%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7682 Points ∼66% -2%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
7646 Points ∼66% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
5904 Points ∼51% -25%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
80496 Points ∼100% +70%
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
50981 Points ∼63% +8%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
49539 Points ∼62% +5%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
47250 Points ∼59%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
46362 Points ∼58% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
36659 Points ∼46% -22%
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus FX502VM-AS73
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
14732 Points ∼100% +49%
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9909 Points ∼67%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9768 Points ∼66% -1%
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
9725 Points ∼66% -2%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
7919 Points ∼54% -20%
3DMark 11 Performance
9045 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
85236 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22010 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6720 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
3550 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2455 points
Help
0123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Tooltip
The Witcher 3 ultra
low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 216176.8163.470.7fps
Battlefield 4 (2013) 180.2176.414671.3fps
The Witcher 3 (2015) 128.186.248.326.6fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 115.468.238.932.5fps

Noise Level

Idle
32 / 34 / 36 dB(A)
HDD
34 dB(A)
Load
48 / 51 dB(A)
 
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30 dB(A)
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Noise
3%
11%
6%
13%
6%
7%
off / environment *
30
30
-0%
30.4
-1%
30.3
-1%
27.7
8%
28.7
4%
28.8
4%
Idle Minimum *
32
32
-0%
31.4
2%
30.9
3%
30.5
5%
30.6
4%
33.1
-3%
Idle Average *
34
33
3%
31.4
8%
30.9
9%
30.5
10%
30.6
10%
33.1
3%
Idle Maximum *
36
36
-0%
31.4
13%
31
14%
30.6
15%
31
14%
34
6%
Load Average *
48
43
10%
36.8
23%
46.5
3%
40
17%
46.2
4%
37.2
22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
49
40
18%
46.1
6%
Load Maximum *
51
49
4%
41.3
19%
46.8
8%
42.6
16%
52.3
-3%
47.1
8%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: Prime95 only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark only
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
Stress test: FurMark+Prime95
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Heat
3%
9%
21%
4%
-3%
1%
Maximum Upper Side *
52.4
48.5
7%
47
10%
43.4
17%
46.8
11%
53.2
-2%
Maximum Bottom *
54.2
59
-9%
47
13%
37.7
30%
55.8
-3%
56.8
-5%
Idle Upper Side *
30.5
28.7
6%
28.4
7%
24.3
20%
27.6
10%
28.8
6%
28.4
7%
Idle Bottom *
28.2
25.7
9%
27.1
4%
23.6
16%
28.4
-1%
31.4
-11%
29.6
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load
 38.3 °C52.4 °C47.9 °C 
 31.4 °C48.6 °C48.5 °C 
 27.3 °C42.8 °C45.4 °C 
Maximum: 52.4 °C
Average: 42.5 °C
51 °C54.2 °C35.7 °C
41.8 °C38 °C28.7 °C
44.8 °C37.5 °C27 °C
Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 39.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  48.6 °C | Room Temperature 24 °C | Voltcraft IR-900
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.742.52534.236.93130314043.844.55033.834.76326.828.38024.927.710025.930.712524.636.116023.343.32002448.225022.853.831521.859.740020.161.650019.563.563018.967.180018.269.4100018.369.7125017.971.1160017.569.2200017.467.3250017.568.5315017.766.7400017.767.7500017.568.6630017.664.2800017.660.8100001854.91250018.752.81600017.548.7SPL30.379.6N1.445.9median 18.2HP Omen 15-ax213ngmedian 63.5Delta2.48.737.839.434.837.433.634.533.832.43331.634.436.232.732.130.53130.43228.530.22834.427.345.826.255.125.858.124.959.324.963.227.262.325.263.424.969.623.770.423.866.123.774.123.374.623.17523.170.92372.42369.623.163.722.963.723.256.136.3832.751.8median 24.9MSI GS63VR 7RF-228USmedian 63.41.910.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise
HP Omen 15-ax213ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.98 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 10%, average was 18%, worst was 34%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 22%, worst was 53%

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.3 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 6 / 11 / 18 Watt
Load midlight 81 / 146 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 7700HQ
Asus FX502VM-AS73
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 7700HQ
Power Consumption
-1%
6%
26%
5%
-40%
-51%
Idle Minimum *
6
7
-17%
7
-17%
4.4
27%
8.5
-42%
14.9
-148%
14.5
-142%
Idle Average *
11
11
-0%
10.2
7%
6.8
38%
9.1
17%
15.1
-37%
17.3
-57%
Idle Maximum *
18
19
-6%
14
22%
8.3
54%
9.7
46%
15.2
16%
17.4
3%
Load Average *
81
79
2%
78
4%
81
-0%
79.9
1%
105.8
-31%
93
-15%
Load Maximum *
146
119
18%
127
13%
127
13%
121.5
17%
148.8
-2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
90
97.7
-9%
128.8
-43%

* ... smaller is better

maximum battery runtime
maximum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
minimum battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
Wi-Fi battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
H.264 battery runtime
charging time
charging time
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 45min
WiFi Surfing v1.3 (Edge 40.15063.0.0)
7h 08min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 16min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 37min
HP Omen 15-ax213ng
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 63.3 Wh
HP Omen 15-ax007ng
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 52.5 Wh
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7567
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 74 Wh
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN-80WK001KUS
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook), 45 Wh
Asus FX502VM-AS73
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 64 Wh
MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US
7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Battery Runtime
-14%
-34%
54%
-43%
-41%
-40%
Reader / Idle
765
467
-39%
322
-58%
1174
53%
509
-33%
363
-53%
386
-50%
H.264
196
244
24%
455
132%
WiFi v1.3
428
272
-36%
302
-29%
622
45%
240
-44%
277
-35%
232
-46%
Load
97
93
-4%
81
-16%
81
-16%
46
-53%
64
-34%
75
-23%

Pros

+ 良好的系统性能
+ 快速固态硬盘
+ 大容量存储(固体硬盘+机械硬盘)
+ 16 GB RAM
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 良好的3D性能(适用于FHD)
+ 智能端口定位
+ 紧凑
+ 键盘背光
+ 图形切换
+ 轻量级
+ 光滑设计

Cons

- 在负载下,噪声明显
- 端口的选择很少(没有USB 3.1 Gen2,没有DisplayPort,...)
- 平庸的FHD显示(亮度,颜色空间,...)
- 外壳某些地方吱吱作响
- 维护可以更容易
- 扬声器不好
HP Omen 15 2017, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de
HP Omen 15 2017, test unit provided by notebooksbilliger.de

惠普 Omen 15t(2017)将不会太好受,特别是当竞争对手一直在为新的Pascal架构提供各种设备时。该15英寸的设备有很好的设计,虽说作为一个1500美元的设备,它的做工可以更好。我们也不明白为什么它会缺少最新的端口,如DisplayPort或USB 3.1 Gen2。它的连接性不适用于未来。

惠普 Omen 15t(2017)表现出了坚实性能。这一点,在我们的评级中发挥了重要作用。该设备配备了Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti和强大的Intel Core i7-7700HQ。这种由16 GB 运行内存支持的配件组合,可让您以高清晰度顺利播放时下的游戏。

如果您一直在期待着惠普 Omen 15t(2017),那么现在您将获得可靠的游戏表现。然而,制造商决定不更新其端口并坚持原貌。

此外,惠普也因为其屏幕不够亮而失分。色彩空间覆盖率同样令人失望。尽管如此,我们喜欢Omen HP15的系统性能,NVMe SSD也进一步增强了它。

注:本文是基于完整评测减版本,阅读完整的英文评测

HP Omen 15-ax213ng - 07/03/2017 v6
Sebastian Bade

Chassis
75 / 98 → 77%
Keyboard
77%
Pointing Device
72%
Connectivity
53 / 81 → 66%
Weight
61 / 67 → 88%
Battery
79%
Display
86%
Games Performance
90 / 85 → 100%
Application Performance
90 / 92 → 98%
Temperature
83%
Noise
68 / 95 → 71%
Audio
65%
Average
75%
82%
Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普 Omen 15t 2017 (7700HQ, GTX 1050 Ti, Full HD) 笔记本电脑简短评测
Sebastian Bade, 2017-07-18 (Update: 2017-07-24)