Ryzen 7 7745HX性能首次亮相:联想Legion Pro 5 16代8笔记本评测
联想Legion Pro 5 16ARX8是英特尔Legion Pro 5 16IRX8的AMD版本。两种型号都采用相同的Legion Pro 5 16 Gen 8机箱,其他方面在视觉上是相同的。我们建议查看我们的 关于Legion Pro 5 16IRX8的现有评论以了解更多关于该型号的物理特性,因为我们的许多评论仍然适用于Legion Pro 5 16ARX8。
我们的测试装置是一个更高端的配置,配备Zen 4 Ryzen 7 7745HX CPU,140 WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU,以及165 Hz 1600p IPS显示屏,零售价约为1600美元。其他SKU可能包括Ryzen 5 7645HX,GeForce RTX 4050,或240 Hz IPS显示屏。这款特殊的机型是首批配备中端Ryzen 7 7745HX的机型之一,而早期的Zen 4笔记本电脑只配备价格较高的Ryzen 9 7945HX。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他中端到高端游戏笔记本电脑,如 华硕ROG Strix G16, Razer Blade 16, 联合利华GM6PX7X, 或 MSI Pulse GL76.Legion 7系列比我们的Legion Pro 5高一个档次,有更快的CPU和GPU选项可供挑选。
更多联想的评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.4 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.9 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.2 % | 03/2023 | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.7 % | 04/2023 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 29.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88 % | 04/2023 | Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 29.7 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 相同的外观和相同的端口
AMDLegion Pro 5 16ARX8与英特尔Legion Pro 5 16IRX8共享同一机箱。虽然大多数AMD和英特尔变体之间通常有一些端口差异,但这两个型号之间实际上没有差异,因为联想已经选择在所有Legion 5 Pro SKU上排除USB 4和Thunderbolt支持,无论CPU选项如何。这可以看作是一种迫使用户考虑更昂贵的Legion 7系列的方式,因为该系列默认包括Thunderbolt支持。
沟通
AMD型号将常见的英特尔AX211换成了不太常见的联发科MT7922。在与我们的6GHz网络配对时,性能是稳定和可靠的。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
网络摄像头
维护
显示器 - 165赫兹,1600p,全sRGB
有趣的是,我们的AMD供电的Legion Pro 5 16ARX8采用了与英特尔供电的Legion Pro 5 16IRX8不同的IPS面板(CSOT MNG007DA1-Q vs. AU Optronics B160QAN03.1),尽管这两块面板具有相似的165 Hz原生刷新率、1600p原生分辨率、约1000:1的对比度和100%的sRGB覆盖。CSOT面板的黑白和灰度响应时间稍快,但对于基本相同的观看体验来说,其差异充其量是微不足道的。
第二块面板是可用的,它承诺有更亮的500尼特背光和更快的240赫兹刷新率。我们下面的测量结果只反映了基本的165赫兹面板。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 355.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1110:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.13 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.32
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NE160QDM-NM4, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -4% | -4% | 18% | 22% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.4 | 71.2 1% | 67.5 -4% | 67.3 -4% | 97 38% | 99.4 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.6 | 98.8 -1% | 96.4 -3% | 96.7 -3% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.6 | 73.3 1% | 68.6 -6% | 68.9 -5% | 84.9 17% | 90.8 25% |
Response Times | -61% | -44% | -51% | 27% | -113% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7 ? | 14.5 ? -107% | 12.6 ? -80% | 14.5 ? -107% | 5.1 ? 27% | 15.2 ? -117% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.1 ? | 10.4 ? -14% | 9.8 ? -8% | 8.6 ? 5% | 6.6 ? 27% | 19 ? -109% |
PWM Frequency | 12000 ? | |||||
Screen | -17% | -69% | -54% | -39% | 71% | |
Brightness middle | 355.3 | 405.7 14% | 338.6 -5% | 372 5% | 470 32% | 712 100% |
Brightness | 340 | 368 8% | 328 -4% | 349 3% | 459 35% | 703 107% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 89 -2% | 88 -3% | 93 2% | 95 4% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.38 -19% | 0.32 -0% | 0.32 -0% | 0.42 -31% | 0.07 78% |
Contrast | 1110 | 1068 -4% | 1058 -5% | 1163 5% | 1119 1% | 10171 816% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.13 | 1.65 -46% | 2.18 -93% | 2.06 -82% | 1.86 -65% | 1.7 -50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.78 | 4.2 -51% | 7.14 -157% | 3 -8% | 3.87 -39% | 4 -44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.32 | 0.53 -66% | 0.93 -191% | 1.5 -369% | 0.93 -191% | 1.2 -275% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.2 14% | 3.7 -164% | 1.9 -36% | 2.7 -93% | 2.8 -100% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.3 96% | 2.18 101% | 2.312 95% | 2.246 98% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6372 102% | 6453 101% | 7245 90% | 6747 96% | 6711 97% | 6978 93% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -26% /
-20% | -39% /
-52% | -36% /
-43% | 2% /
-17% | -7% /
34% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器开箱后就进行了预校准,平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别为1.4和1.13,非常出色。试图用我们的X-Rite色度计进一步校准显示器,实际上会将灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别提高到<0.5。即便如此,如果deltaE值已经<2,通常不需要进行终端用户校准。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.9 ms rise | |
↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.2 ms rise | |
↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
户外能见度在该类别中属于平均水平,因为大多数游戏笔记本电脑的显示屏通常在300至400尼特之间。240赫兹面板选项承诺为500尼特,或比我们的165赫兹面板明亮约200尼特,这应该会改善户外能见度,如果这是一个问题。无论如何,你会希望尽可能地在阴凉处工作,以减少眩光并保持颜色。
性能 - 中端Zen 4 Ryzen 7
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和联想Vantage软件将我们的设备设置为性能模式。我们还确保将图形设置为dGPU模式,并激活预设的GPU超频功能。建议熟悉Vantage,因为它是控制键盘照明功能、联想特定更新、GPU行为等的主要界面。
支持MUX,以便在Optimus(iGPU + dGPU)或仅dGPU之间切换。只有在dGPU模式下,内部显示器才支持G-Sync。在Optimus和dGPU模式之间切换时,需要重启,因为不支持高级Optimus。令人讨厌的是,在图形模式之间切换时,重启过程会比普通重启的时间长很多。
处理器
在经历了令人难以置信的Zen 4Ryzen 9 7945HX后,又被不尽如人意的Zen 3所击倒。Ryzen 7 7735HS我们不确定对Zen 4的期望是什么Ryzen 7 7745HX.值得庆幸的是,作为一款中端CPU,其结果非常好,单线程和多线程性能得分分别比Ryzen 7 7735HS高出15%和30%。因此,Ryzen 7 7745HX在竞争者的范围内。 酷睿i7-13700HX在大多数基准测试中,包括LibreOffice和HWBOT x265 4K,仅有5%至15%。这绝对是一个合理的升级,从去年的Ryzen 7 6800H或 Ryzen 9 6900HX当与Ryzen 7 7735HX相比。
联想提供了一个较慢的Ryzen 5 7645HX选项,核心数量比Ryzen 7 7745HX少(6个对8个)。然而,截至目前,我们还没有亲自测试Ryzen 5 7645HX,因此这两个选项之间的性能差异目前还不清楚。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (18060 - 18845, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (1846 - 1854, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (7072 - 7399, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (717 - 719, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (2978 - 2994, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (294 - 295, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (169 - 174, n=2) | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (75557 - 83268, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (7244 - 7275, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (12378 - 13462, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (2040 - 2067, n=2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (23.2 - 24.1, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (37.9 - 41.4, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G513RW | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI Pulse GL76 12UGK | |
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (0.4141 - 0.421, n=2) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
SCHENKER XMG SECTOR, i9 13900K, RTX 4090 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (29066 - 29656, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (120974 - 123689, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (4974 - 5204, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (126954 - 128143, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (15887 - 16221, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (64255 - 64969, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (71191 - 95481, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (1147 - 1176, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (15975 - 16358, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (28499 - 33304, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8206 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (50007 - 53867, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (50703 - 54278, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (54587 - 70803, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX (80.7 - 86.5, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签或运行Prime95压力时,没有重大的DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放是非常好的,在我们的测试视频中只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个PCIe4 x4驱动器
我们的设备配备了一个1TB 三星PM9A1NVMe SSD,这是目前最快的消费级PCIe4 x4 SSD之一。传输速率最高约为6600MB/s,但如下图所示,在我们的压力测试中,仅仅几分钟后,性能就降到了3300MB/s。结果表明,联想的固态硬盘没有得到适当的冷却,就像其他笔记本电脑中的相同固态硬盘一样,例如 联合利华GM6PX7X可以在更长的时间内维持更高的传输率。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--中高端图形卡
原始图形性能可与去年的 移动版eForce RTX 3070 Ti.140W的TGP目标允许联想的移动RTX 4070在性能上略微超过其他大多数具有相同GPU的笔记本电脑。
降级到 移动RTX 4060或 移动RTX 4050SKU,预计性能会分别下降15%和20%。不幸的是,目前没有 移动RTX 4080选项,这将使性能比我们的移动RTX 4070大幅提高40%至50%。相反,这样的高端GPU选项是为联想的顶级Legion 7系列保留的。
根据3DMarkTime Spy ,在没有超频的情况下,在平衡电源配置文件上运行dGPU将使图形性能下降约13%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 34813 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 28009 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12431 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
我们的AMD驱动的RTX 4070模型在最坏的情况下会与英特尔驱动的RTX 4060模型表现差不多,最好的情况下会快20%。正如预期的那样,在以更高的分辨率和设置玩更高要求的游戏时,这两款GPU之间的性能差距往往会扩大。例如,《F1 22》和《Returnal》 在我们的AMDLegion 模型上运行时快了15%至20%,而像《GTA V》 这样的老游戏会显示较小的帧率优势,只有5%至10%。因此,你会想玩更多较新的游戏,以更好地利用移动RTX 4070的优势。
一般来说,移动RTX 4070与原生2560 x 1600分辨率的显示器搭配得很好,尤其是支持G-Sync。虽然移动版比桌面版要弱得多 桌面版本约30%,但它仍然足够强大,可以在1600p和60+FPS的高设置下运行最新的游戏。不为帧生成的缺点所困扰的玩家可以在支持的游戏中启用DLSS3,以获得更高的帧率。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 185.8 | 185.1 | 178.6 | 119.9 | 93.2 | 93.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 597 | 415.1 | 257.3 | 119.8 | 76.2 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 238 | 203 | 191.8 | 182 | 151.5 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 229 | 172.5 | 119.9 | 119.9 | 49.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 186.3 | 155.2 | 117.8 | 99.5 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 636 | 334 | 260 | 223 | 146.4 | 76.8 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 168 | 110 | 53 | |||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 110 | 88 | 43 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 185.8 | 157.6 | 121.3 | 98.9 | 58.1 | 24.7 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 263.6 | 217.3 | 144.5 | 112.1 | 76.9 | 39.7 |
F1 22 (2022) | 311 | 300 | 235 | 84.1 | 54.8 | 26.4 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 108 | 77 | 44 | |||
Returnal (2023) | 93 | 90 | 85 | 77 | 55 | 29 |
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) | 77.9 | 50.4 | 24.2 |
排放
系统噪音 - 游戏时约为50 dB(A)
在游戏时,AMD和英特尔型号的风扇噪音大致相同,约为48 dB(A)。然而,如果CPU的压力大得多,风扇噪音最高可达54 dB(A)。50分贝(A)的低范围是大多数游戏笔记本电脑的典型特征,包括华硕ROG Strix G16或Razer Blade 16.
有趣的是,在运行办公室工作或视频播放等要求不高的负载时,风扇的噪音要小一些,而且脉动也不频繁。在升压时,AMD的CPU比英特尔的CPU消耗更少的功率,这可能有助于稳定的风扇噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 26.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 31.4 / 53.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -9% | -37% | -15% | -19% | |
off / environment * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 22.4 3% | 25 -8% | 25 -8% | 23.9 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23.1 -0% | 22.9 1% | 31 -34% | 26 -12% | 23.9 -3% |
Idle Average * | 23.2 | 23.1 -0% | 29 -25% | 33 -42% | 28 -21% | 32.9 -42% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 26.6 -2% | 29 -11% | 42 -60% | 30 -15% | 36.5 -39% |
Load Average * | 31.4 | 34.7 -11% | 40.2 -28% | 58 -85% | 48 -53% | 42.9 -37% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.4 | 47.6 2% | 48.7 -1% | 57 -18% | 49 -1% | 51.2 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 53.8 | 54.8 -2% | 55 -2% | 59 -10% | 52 3% | 56 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度在靠近机箱中心和后部的地方最热,在游戏时,热点可以达到略高于40摄氏度。竞争机型如华硕ROG Zephyrus M16在类似的测试条件下,运行温度甚至超过50℃。毫无疑问,Legion 设计上相对较大的通风格栅是取得较好温度的部分原因。
无论屏幕上的负载如何,掌托几乎不发热,以保持游戏时的双手舒适。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.4 °C / 86.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.5 °C / -2.7 F).
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -9% | -12% | -7% | -18% | -5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.8 | 42.8 -2% | 38.2 9% | 50 -20% | 54 -29% | 44.2 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 41.4 | 50 -21% | 45 -9% | 51 -23% | 55 -33% | 46.8 -13% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29 | 29.6 -2% | 33.6 -16% | 28 3% | 29 -0% | 29.2 -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.4 | 34 -12% | 39.6 -30% | 26 14% | 33 -9% | 30.2 1% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试--一个温暖的CPU
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和主板功耗将分别飙升至4.9 GHz和110 W,然后在几秒钟后迅速降至4.6 GHz和90 W范围。核心温度将稳定在非常高的90摄氏度至100摄氏度的范围内,这甚至比已经很热的Core i7-13700HX的温度还要高几度。 另一个英特尔Legion 型号.很明显,Ryzen 7 CPU正在挑战机箱冷却解决方案的极限,如果采用更快的Ryzen 9解决方案,就必须做出妥协。
在性能模式下,dGPU将稳定在2430 MHz核心、2050 MHz内存、67 C和105 W,而目标TGP为140 W。 Witcher 3在性能模式下。英特尔Legion 模式中的RTX 4060也将稳定在105 W和110 W之间,因为尽管这两个GPU的性能不同,但都处于类似的功率包络之下。在禁用GPU超频功能的平衡模式下进行游戏,将导致GPU时钟降低到1965 MHz,并且主板功耗大大降低,只有80 W。如上所述,平衡模式和性能模式之间的性能差距约为10%至15%。
用电池供电运行会降低性能。在电池上进行的Fire Strike 测试,物理和图形分数分别为10865和9334分,而在主电源上则为11477和12617分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 53 | 35 |
Prime95压力 | 4.6 - 4.7 | -- | 100 | 42 |
Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 3.7 - 4.3 | 2250 | 92 - 100 | 69 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能模式) | 4.9 | 2430 | 86 | 67 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | 3.1 | 1965 | 84 | 62 |
发言人
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗 - 比酷睿i7-13700HX的CPU提升更低
在桌面上闲置时,AMD机型比Intel机型更省电。否则,在运行更高的负载(如游戏)时,两款机型需要的功率差不多。两种型号还配备了相同的300W交流适配器,为140W的GPU和100W的CPU提供了足够的空间。
值得注意的是,英特尔模型中的酷睿i7-13700HX可以提升到159W的主板功耗,而我们的Ryzen 7 7745HX只有110W,这将部分解释它比AMD CPU的性能优势。然而,当Turbo Boost时钟速率在几分钟的压力后稳定下来时,两种型号的功耗将变得更加接近,正如下面的对比图所示。例如,英特尔和AMD型号在运行Prime95几分钟后将分别稳定在158瓦和149瓦,尽管英特尔型号在测试开始时可以提升到220瓦。
Off / Standby | 0.04 / 1.5 Watt |
Idle | 8.1 / 15.9 / 37.2 Watt |
Load |
90.9 / 263.5 Watt |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, MiniLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -46% | -13% | -23% | -17% | -51% | |
Idle Minimum * | 8.1 | 24.5 -202% | 12.6 -56% | 8 1% | 10 -23% | 19.2 -137% |
Idle Average * | 15.9 | 29.2 -84% | 17.7 -11% | 18 -13% | 16 -1% | 29.7 -87% |
Idle Maximum * | 37.2 | 34.3 8% | 31.8 15% | 28 25% | 27 27% | 30.8 17% |
Load Average * | 90.9 | 98.7 -9% | 101.4 -12% | 133 -46% | 129 -42% | 126 -39% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 189.6 | 178.6 6% | 185.3 2% | 294 -55% | 247 -30% | 258 -36% |
Load Maximum * | 263.5 | 249.6 5% | 298 -13% | 399 -51% | 342 -30% | 330 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
当设置为iGPU激活的平衡电源配置文件时,WLAN运行时间只是比英特尔版本略长约30分钟。虽然对于游戏笔记本电脑来说还不错,但像Schenker XMG Neo 16或华硕ROG Strix G16有更大的电池容量和更长的运行时间,分别超过两个小时。
用附带的交流适配器从空电到满电的充电速度很快,大约1到1.5小时。快速充电在默认情况下是启用的,而不像旧的Legion 或Yoga型号,它可能被禁用。使用第三方USB-C适配器充电,只支持沿后方的USB-C端口。
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Uniwill GM6PX7X RTX 4070 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -15% | 0% | 66% | 75% | -4% | |
Reader / Idle | 392 | 401 2% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 240 | 205 -15% | 241 0% | 399 66% | 583 143% | 238 -1% |
Load | 61 | 41 -33% | 65 7% | 57 -7% | ||
H.264 | 349 | 230 | ||||
Witcher 3 ultra | 84 |
Pros
Cons
结论--AMD是游戏玩家的更好选择
联想在这里有两个非常有趣的选择:英特尔酷睿i7-13700HXLegion Pro 5 16,配备RTX 4060显卡,售价1600美元;或AMD Ryzen 7 7745HXLegion Pro 5 16,配备RTX 4070显卡--也是1600美元。前者提供约10%的CPU性能,代价是15%的GPU性能减慢,而后者则相反。关于这两个选项的其他内容几乎都是相同的,因为它们都有相同的机箱设计。因此,重视CPU性能而非GPU的用户可能想要英特尔的方案,而更重视GPU的用户可能想要AMD的方案。
由于Legion Pro 5 16首先是一台游戏笔记本电脑,大多数用户将希望选择AMD选项,以获得更快的RTX 4070图形。几乎所有的最新游戏都是GPU绑定的,因此任何高于Ryzen 7 7745HX的额外CPU性能优势对游戏体验的影响都是最小的。在这种情况下,相对较高的1600美元要价是比较合理的,因为用户得到的是RTX 4070而不是较慢的RTX 4060。
价格和可用性
联想目前正在运送其Legion Pro 5 16代8,基本的Ryzen 5/RTX 4050配置起价为1280美元,而我们的Ryzen 7/RTX 4070配置则为1600美元。截至目前,该机型还没有通过百思买或亚马逊等主要经销商广泛销售。
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
-
05/24/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.