联想Legion 7 16IAX7笔记本电脑评论。快速的16英寸游戏机,165赫兹的显示屏

Legion 7 16是联想在16英寸格式的游戏旗舰,提供了目前市场上的一切:英特尔HX CPU、GeForce RTX 3080 Ti,165赫兹的WQHD面板,以及最新的PCIe 4.0 SSD。然而,这也是有代价的,因为联想对高端玩家收取了4500欧元(约合4500美元)的高额费用。在这篇评论中,我们将新的Legion 7 16与主要由17英寸机型组成的游戏竞争产品进行比较,同时也与 Legion 采用AMD硬件的7 16.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.9 % | 09/2022 | Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % | 09/2022 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.3 % | 08/2022 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
83.7 % | 08/2022 | Aorus 17X XES i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 30 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
89.5 % | 08/2022 | Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.4 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % | 07/2022 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
88.2 % | 05/2022 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 3840x2400 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 -Legion 7,铝制机箱
Legion 7 16采用了银灰色的铝制机箱,对于这样一台强大的游戏笔记本电脑来说,视觉上相当谨慎。我们非常喜欢这种内敛的设计,而且稳定性也很好。底座和显示器盖子都不会凹陷或扭曲,而且完全没有吱吱作响的声音。屏幕的边缘非常薄,设备看起来非常现代。
虽然屏幕铰链在前面稍有偏移,但它允许180度的最大开启角度。显示屏也可以用一只手轻松打开,跷二郎腿也不是问题。选择性地施加压力并没有导致任何图像失真。
与华硕的两款16英寸机型一起,Legion 7 16是比较领域中最紧凑的机型之一。2.6公斤,它本身并不轻,但大多数竞争对手在这里也要重一点。然而,你不应该忘记笨重的300瓦电源适配器,它比一些超极本更重,超过一公斤。
设备 - 带有2.5 GBit/s以太网和Thunderbolt 4的玩家
Legion 提供大量最新的接口,其中大部分位于背面。在底座的上侧有一些有用的标签,使插入电缆更容易。我们希望在侧面有一个标准的USB-A端口(例如用于U盘)以及一个读卡器,实际上有足够的空间用于此。
沟通
除了快速的2.5Gbit/s以太网端口外,Legion 7 16还提供了一个非常现代的WLAN模块(Wi-Fi 6E),包括对现代6GHz网络以及蓝牙5.2的支持。在我们用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化WLAN测试中,杀手AX1675i实现了非常高和稳定的传输速率,我们能够毫无问题地连接到6GHz网络。
网络摄像头
联想在上层显示框中安装了一个1080p网络摄像头,可以通过机箱右侧的开关停用。图像质量比720p的模块略好。总的来说,网络摄像头达到了它的目的。没有红外传感器用于通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。

维护
输入设备 - 联想安装单键照明系统
显示屏--联想安装了一个快速的165赫兹面板
联想安装了一个16英寸的IPS显示屏,分辨率为2560x1600,表面为亚光,主观画质非常好。由于高刷新率,移动非常流畅,所有内容都显示得非常清晰,即使是明亮的表面也完全没有颗粒感。该面板还提供了非常快的响应时间,我们没有发现任何PWM闪烁。HDR内容和G-Sync也得到了支持。
联想指定的亮度为500cd/m²,这甚至超过了我们的审查样本,平均为523cd/m²。然而,0.44的黑值相对较高,这就是为什么对比度 "只有"~1,200:1。当然,其他显示技术,如OLED或迷你LED在这里有优势。在全亮度下,你还可以在黑暗的背景上看到轻微的光晕,但这在实践中不应该是一个问题。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 546 cd/m²
Contrast: 1243:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 0.9
ΔE Greyscale 3.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
70.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE NE160QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 BOE0A99, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | MSI Titan GT77 12UHS Sharp SHP1544 LQ173M1JW08, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Aorus 17X XES Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AUO B160QAN02.S, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.10 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 2% | 2% | 24% | 23% | 22% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 69 0% | 70.8 2% | 70.1 1% | 99.82 44% | 99.4 43% | 98 41% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.2 | 99.8 2% | 98.9 1% | 99.9 2% | 99.99 2% | 100 2% | 99.9 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.8 | 69.6 -2% | 73 3% | 71.9 2% | 90.21 27% | 87.3 23% | 86.3 22% |
Response Times | 3% | 41% | 35% | -42% | 20% | -8% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12.6 ? | 10.8 ? 14% | 3.03 ? 76% | 3.4 ? 73% | 11 ? 13% | 7.5 ? 40% | 14.6 ? -16% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 ? | 6.1 ? -9% | 5.28 ? 6% | 5.8 ? -4% | 11 ? -96% | 5.6 ? -0% | 5.6 ? -0% |
PWM Frequency | 7400 ? | ||||||
Screen | 9% | -23% | -39% | 27% | 16% | -19% | |
Brightness middle | 547 | 415 -24% | 280 -49% | 278 -49% | 498 -9% | 503 -8% | 459 -16% |
Brightness | 523 | 399 -24% | 275 -47% | 273 -48% | 502 -4% | 486 -7% | 434 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 90 2% | 79 -10% | 79 -10% | 94 7% | 84 -5% | 88 0% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.43 2% | 0.4 9% | 0.26 41% | 0.11 75% | 0.44 -0% | 0.44 -0% |
Contrast | 1243 | 965 -22% | 700 -44% | 1069 -14% | 4527 264% | 1143 -8% | 1043 -16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1.44 31% | 2.1 -0% | 3.96 -89% | 1.87 11% | 1.08 49% | 2.97 -41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7 | 2.33 67% | 5.83 17% | 10.78 -54% | 6.15 12% | 4.54 35% | 8.13 -16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 0.89 1% | 1.58 -76% | 1.07 -19% | 1.94 -116% | 0.6 33% | 1.03 -14% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 1.8 44% | 3.3 -3% | 6.8 -113% | 3.15 2% | 1.3 59% | 4.9 -53% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.132 103% | 2.13 103% | 2.224 99% | 330.95 1% | 2.151 102% | 2.235 98% |
CCT | 6979 93% | 6327 103% | 7060 92% | 7651 85% | 7294 89% | 6541 99% | 6775 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 4% /
6% | 7% /
-8% | -1% /
-20% | 3% /
17% | 20% /
18% | -2% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 4.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.9 ms rise | |
↘ 6.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18694 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 英特尔HX CPU和GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
测试条件
联想通过预装的Vantage软件提供三种不同的性能配置,可以通过软件或Fn+Q组合键进行切换。激活的模式非常方便地通过电源按钮的照明显示出来(白色=平衡,蓝色=安静, 红色=性能)。我们在下表中列出了各自的TDP/TGP设置。
模式 | CPU负载 | GPU负载 | 压力测试 | 最大风扇噪音 |
---|---|---|---|---|
静音 | 113瓦 | 64瓦 | CPU:86瓦GPU 。42 瓦 |
39 dB(A) |
平衡 | 121瓦 | 115瓦 | CPU:86瓦GPU :115 瓦 |
48,8 dB(A) |
性能 | 165 -> 136瓦 | 115瓦 | CPU:94瓦GPU :150 瓦 |
54,2 dB(A) |
此外,图形模式可以在Vantage软件中进行切换,你可以将其设置为只使用专用显卡。这在我们的随机测试中没有产生重大影响,这就是为什么我们用预设的混合GPU模式与性能 模式相结合进行测量和基准测试。然而,性能 模式在电池模式下是不可用的。
处理器 - Core i9-12900HX
芯片 酷睿i9-12900HX是目前英特尔最快的移动处理器,基于Alder Lake S级的桌面芯片。有8个性能核心,包括超线程和8个效率核心,因此该芯片可以同时处理总共24个线程。消耗峰值高达165瓦,然后迅速平息在136瓦,这使得在基准测试中取得优异成绩。酷睿i9的效率不是特别高,但比起 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX在我们所有的CPU测试中,Legion 7 16的优势是平均39%。此外,评测设备与同样配备酷睿i9-12900HX的较大的17英寸机型不相上下。
即使在长时间的负载下,性能仍然完全稳定,但在电池模式下,消耗很快就达到了40瓦左右,这相当于在多核测试中的性能损失高达75%。更多CPU基准测试可在 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (18337 - 23482, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (1897 - 1936, n=8) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (7037 - 9042, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (728 - 745, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (2830 - 3652, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (274 - 282, n=8) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (144 - 201, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (69778 - 88128, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (6165 - 6358, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (15116 - 16925, n=8) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (1874 - 1949, n=8) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (19.6 - 26.6, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (33.6 - 42.4, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (0.4159 - 0.4242, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Aorus 17X XES |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (11535 - 22183, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (52916 - 110093, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (3559 - 5123, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (101029 - 104457, n=7) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (10475 - 13062, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (31779 - 53628, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (125268 - 183146, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (990 - 1408, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (6663 - 11913, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (40239 - 47710, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
系统性能
我们对Legion 7 16的主观性能印象非常好,考虑到这些组件,这并不令人惊讶。合成测试中的良好结果证实了这一印象。该评测设备是市场上最快的设备之一。在测试中也没有出现问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9598 - 11192, n=6) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9365 - 10932, n=6) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9543 - 14291, n=6) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1978 - 2047, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (2288 - 2366, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1991 - 2090, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8636 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (62852 - 70863, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 88014, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (62140 - 72930, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (60001 - 68782, n=7) | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 103259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX (83.9 - 93.4, n=7) | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 136.8, n=226, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 17 M22 | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16ARHA7 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Aorus 17X XES | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Legion 为M.2-2280固态硬盘提供了两个现代化的PCIe 4.0插槽,这些插槽还配备了散热器。在我们的审查配置中,其中一个插槽未被占用,另一个配备了快速的美光3400-SSD,提供了1TB的存储容量(首次启动后可使用886GB)。传输速率非常好,超过6GB/s,在长时间的负载中,性能只有极小的下降。没有登记任何温度问题。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.