Razer Blade 14 Zen 4笔记本电脑回顾:很多重要的变化
虽然 2022年刀片14是一个小的内部更新 2021年刀锋14而2023年的型号是一个更重要的重新设计,包括物理和内部变化。更具体地说,它通过将旧的16:9的外形尺寸换成16:10的长宽比,使该系列向前推进。
我们审查的单位是一个更高端的配置,配备了AMD Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7940HS,140 WGeForce RTX 4070显卡,16 GB DDR5-5600内存,以及2560 x 1600 240 Hz IPS显示屏,以取代去年的Zen 3+。 Ryzen 9 6900HS, 100 W RTX 3070 Ti, 16 GB DDR5-4800 RAM, 和2560 x 1440 165 Hz IPS显示屏。也有一个配备RTX 4060的较小的配置,价格从2400美元到2800美元不等,但在撰写本文时,所有SKU的Ryzen 9 CPU和16:10 1600p IPS显示屏是固定的。
刀片14的最显著的竞争对手仍然是 华硕Zephyrus G14它可以配置125瓦的RTX 4090 GPU,而目前的Blade 14的最大功率为140瓦GeForce RTX 4070。华硕Acer Predator Triton 300 SE和Alienware x14也一直在14英寸游戏领域取得进展。
更多Razer评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.7 % | 06/2023 | Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 17.99 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % | 05/2022 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 16.8 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1440 | |
90 % | 05/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 20.5 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86 % | 11/2022 | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.7 % | 03/2022 | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 1.8 kg | 14.5 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
90.2 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 比去年的型号更方正、更厚实
与家族中的其他刀片型号一样,新的16:10刀片14采用了相同的高质量CNC阳极氧化铝机身,以获得熟悉的Razer外观和感觉。当然,这并不是一件坏事,因为底座和盖子仍然感觉比其他大多数子笔记本更强、更硬,包括 Zephyrus G14或宏碁掠夺者Triton 300。
从视觉上将2023年的Blade 14与早期的Blade 14机型区分开来的最简单方法是明显更大的点击板和新的滑动式网络摄像头快门的出现。
从16:9到16:10的变化使Blade 14变宽了,同时减少了它的长度,正如下面的对比图所示,占地面积更小。另外,整体重量与以前差不多,为1.8公斤。
请注意,较新的机型也比旧机型厚了1.2毫米,这可能是为了让它能够加入可拆卸的内存模块和要求更高的140瓦GPU。竞争者Zephyrus G14仍然是最厚的选择。
连接性
除了增加对USB4的支持,从而支持eGPU外,端口选项仍然与去年的模型相同。
沟通
高通公司WCN685x再次成为Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.2连接的标准。当与我们的华硕AXE11000测试路由器配对时,我们经历了稳定的性能和没有连接问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE |
网络摄像头
维护
底部面板由8颗Torx螺钉固定,便于拆卸。这次的内存实际上是可拆卸的,最大容量为64GB,而旧型号则限于16GB。重度多任务者和内容创作者尤其会从这一变化中受益匪浅。
配件和保修
除了AC适配器和一些Razer标志的贴纸外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西。如果在美国购买,通常有一年的制造商有限保修。
输入设备 - 相同的感觉,更大的点击板
键盘
在2019年的Blade 15上的光学开关失败后,Razer在键盘方面一直在玩安全。刀片14的打字体验基本上与较大的 刀锋18到短程和轻度反馈的按键。大多数游戏玩家可能更喜欢比这里提供的更多、更响亮的东西,但它与联想Yoga或华硕VivoBook等大多数常规超极本没有区别。尽管如此,Zephyrus G14的按键确实感觉更牢固,打字时更令人满意。
触摸板
虽然键盘没有变化,但点击板现在比以前宽敞多了(15 x 8.5 cm vs. 11.1 x 7.6 cm),成为14英寸副笔记本中最大的一个。牵引力很平稳,由于表面面积更大,多点触摸输入特别容易执行。点击时的反馈仍然是柔和的,非常安静,而不是坚定的和点击的。
显示器 - 240赫兹,FreeSync Premium,100% DCI-P3,1600p
新的Blade 14采用友达光电的16:10 IPS面板,保持简单;想要迷你LED或OLED的玩家则要看Zephyrus G14或Zephyrus G14。 Acer Predator Triton 300 SE来代替。与去年Blade 14的16:9面板相比,较新的面板更加明亮,具有更快的原生刷新率和更高的原生分辨率,同时保持类似的响应时间、黑色水平、色彩再现和通过FreeSync Premium的自适应同步支持。简而言之,较新的面板建立在一个已经很好的面板之上,没有走弯路。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 559.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 1271:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.44 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.39
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
85.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B140QAN06.U, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX TL140BDXP02-0, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Samsung ATNA40YK07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 SHP154D, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 4% | 6% | 2% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.3 | 97.2 0% | 99.6 2% | 99.9 3% | 99.6 2% | 98.7 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.3 | 85.7 0% | 93.4 9% | 99 16% | 87.6 3% | 87.6 3% |
Response Times | -66% | -35% | 86% | 12% | -132% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11.9 ? | 16.8 ? -41% | 17.2 ? -45% | 1.36 ? 89% | 9.6 ? 19% | 31.5 ? -165% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8 ? | 15.2 ? -90% | 9.9 ? -24% | 1.36 ? 83% | 7.6 ? 5% | 15.8 ? -98% |
PWM Frequency | 5430 | 367.6 ? | ||||
Screen | 14% | 37% | 8% | 4% | 22% | |
Brightness middle | 559.3 | 354 -37% | 535 -4% | 414.3 -26% | 434 -22% | 441 -21% |
Brightness | 560 | 328 -41% | 563 1% | 416 -26% | 411 -27% | 453 -19% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 91 3% | 99 13% | 89 1% | 92 5% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.37 16% | 0.25 43% | 0.34 23% | ||
Contrast | 1271 | 957 -25% | 1736 37% | 1297 2% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.44 | 1.66 63% | 1 77% | 4.68 -5% | 3 32% | 0.6 86% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.3 | 3.83 59% | 2.8 70% | 7.78 16% | 7.1 24% | 1.3 86% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.39 | 0.7 -79% | 0.6 -54% | |||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 1.6 76% | 1.8 74% | 1.8 74% | 5.1 25% | 0.8 88% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.23 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6242 104% | 6542 99% | 6337 103% | 6207 105% | 6204 105% | 6597 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-2% | 2% /
15% | 33% /
22% | 6% /
5% | -36% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
尽管该显示器具有宽泛的P3色彩,但开箱后并未进行校准。色温过暖,而平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为6.8和4.44,高于预期。用我们的X-Rite色度计进行校准可以解决这些问题,以更好地利用面板的深层色彩。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
11.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.6 ms rise | |
↘ 6.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - AMD Zen 4
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们通过Windows将设备设置为性能模式,通过Synapse将CPU和GPU设置为各自的最大值。还有一个新的最大风扇速度模式的切换,但启用它可能对最大性能没有必要,正如我们下面的结果所示。建议用户熟悉Synapse,因为它是Razer特定设置的控制中心。
恼人的是,Synapse的电源配置文件没有与Windows的电源配置文件同步,因此有可能使Synapse处于静音模式,而Windows处于性能模式。
不幸的是,高级优化和MUX不被支持。
处理器
最新的Blade 14搭载了相同的Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7940HS最新的Zephyrus G14上的CPU。两种型号的处理器性能基本相同,都在5%以内,但在我们所有的基准测试中,华硕的系统仍然能够非常稳定地胜过Razer。
当与去年的 Ryzen 9 6900HS-相比,新的Ryzen 9 7940HS的单线程性能提高了15%至20%,多线程性能提高了20%至25%。新的Ryzen 9 7945HX要强大得多,但目前只适用于更大的笔记本电脑,如16英寸的华硕Zephyrus Duo 16.
我们可以观察到Blade 14上没有重大的CPU节流行为,正如我们下面一致的CineBench R15 xT循环测试结果所示。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (15556 - 18131, n=9) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1733 - 1832, n=9) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6277 - 7111, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (680 - 714, n=9) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (2470 - 2848, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (277 - 288, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (182 - 202, n=8) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (66408 - 73434, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (6417 - 6776, n=9) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (11207 - 12500, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (1823 - 2032, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (20.1 - 22.6, n=8) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (36.9 - 54.8, n=9) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (0.4159 - 0.4467, n=9) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (25226 - 29109, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (106512 - 123214, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (4566 - 5119, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (118174 - 124783, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (14663 - 15551, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (56839 - 66238, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (86309 - 169946, n=7) | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (866 - 1152, n=7) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (13175 - 15675, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (29922 - 41024, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
系统性能
由于更快的CPU和GPU,PCMark分数一直领先于去年的Blade 14,特别是在生产力和数字内容创作分测试中。结果基本上与搭载RTX 4090的Zephyrus G14不相上下。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8092 - 8205, n=2) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10896 - 10952, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9693 - 10805, n=2) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (12666 - 13618, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1797 - 1812, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1740 - 1762, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1952 - 1979, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1478 - 1575, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8205 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (59712 - 78739, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (50399 - 61735, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (72541 - 91567, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (87.6 - 111.1, n=7) | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们的主页的多个浏览器标签时,只有轻微的DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是完美的,资源利用率低,没有任何丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 目前还没有PCIe5
虽然内存得到了改进,可供用户扩展,但存储仍然保持不变。我们的2023年刀片14配备了相同的PCIe4 x4 三星PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR与2022年型号上的相同。性能很稳定,没有明显的节流问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE -11! | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Ada Lovelace升级
刀片14 RTX 4070比我们数据库中配备相同GPU的普通笔记本电脑快10%左右,考虑到Razer系统的小尺寸,这令人印象深刻。这使它比台式机的RTX 3080落后约20%至30%。 桌面RTX 3080或比去年的 RTX 3070 Ti在考虑到任何DLSS功能之前,Blade 14。
值得注意的是,竞争者Zephyrus G14提供了一个125W的 RTX 4090选项,而目前的Blade 14仅限于140W RTX 4070。尽管他们的TGP不同,华硕系统比我们的Blade 14提供了一个显著的图形提升,约为40%至50%。同时,降级到 RTX 4060的配置预计会带来10%至15%的性能损失。
有趣的是,启用最大风扇模式似乎并没有明显改善性能。在自定义极端模式下运行Fire Strike ,并启用最大风扇,与关闭最大风扇相比,没有重大的性能差异。
电源配置文件设置 | Fire Strike 物理得分 | Fire Strike GPU得分 | Fire Strike 综合得分 |
自定义极限模式,最大风扇开启 | 29771 | 30668 | 14901 |
自定义极限模式,最大风扇关闭 | 28572 | 30600 | 14743 |
平衡模式 | 27016 | 30524 | 14009 |
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio -1! | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti -2! | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 -2! | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX -1! | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 -1! | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 -3! | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 -2! |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 45606, n=49) | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 34794 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 27620 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11996 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
而 桌面RTX 4070 Ti对4K游戏来说足够强大,而我们的移动版本则更适合QHD。因此,该GPU与Blade 14的1600p FreeSync显示器配对良好。即使没有DLSS,大多数要求高的游戏都可以在1600p和60FPS的高设置下运行,包括《赛博朋克2077》和《归来》。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 -1! | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 -1! | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 -3! | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 -1! |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio | |
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 | |
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX | |
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2021 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 182.4 | 176.8 | 169.8 | 108.9 | 90.6 | 87.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 335.2 | 295.9 | 218.5 | 109.5 | 68.5 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 166.4 | 152 | 143.6 | 136.1 | 118.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 198.5 | 159.1 | 113.9 | 84.7 | 46.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 100.5 | 107.3 | 86.2 | 73.4 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 390 | 295 | 235 | 203 | 134.3 | 70.4 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 137 | 102 | 50 | |||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 101 | 75 | 43 | |||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 105 | 87 | 48 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 155.9 | 141.3 | 112 | 90.7 | 54.5 | 24 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 227.5 | 193.9 | 132.5 | 103.2 | 71.4 | 37.4 |
F1 22 (2022) | 232 | 221 | 189.4 | 78.2 | 50.8 | 25.4 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 100 | 71 | 41 | |||
Returnal (2023) | 87 | 85 | 81 | 73 | 52 | 28 |
The Last of Us (2023) | 69.9 | 41.7 | 30.6 |
排放--比去年的车型声音更大
系统噪音
在桌面上空转或运行要求不高的负载时,风扇噪音几乎与去年的型号相同。然而,在高性能模式下,较新的型号可能会更响亮。在禁用最大风扇的情况下,在高性能模式下运行Witcher 3 ,将导致风扇噪音接近53分贝(A),而2022年的Blade 14只有42分贝(A)。如果启用最大风扇模式,噪音会更大,高达56 dB(A)。从低到中的50分贝(A)范围与Zephyrus G14相当,但仍比Predator Triton 300 SE安静。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 33 / 55.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -13% | -14% | -9% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 23.3 -3% | 23.3 -3% | 23.8 -5% | 24.7 -9% | 22.9 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 23.3 -0% | 23.6 -1% | 23.8 -2% | 24.7 -6% | 22.9 2% |
Idle Average * | 23.4 | 23.3 -0% | 23.6 -1% | 23.8 -2% | 24.7 -6% | 22.9 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.4 | 23.3 -0% | 33 -41% | 30.6 -31% | 30.9 -32% | 36.8 -57% |
Load Average * | 33 | 34.7 -5% | 49.5 -50% | 44.2 -34% | 40 -21% | 43.7 -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.8 | 42.1 19% | 52.2 -1% | 60.1 -16% | 51.5 1% | 46.2 11% |
Load Maximum * | 55.6 | 42.1 24% | 52.2 6% | 60 -8% | 51.5 7% | 46.2 17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于新的最大风扇模式和稍厚的外形,表面温度明显比2022年的Blade 14要低。当运行 Witcher 3例如,2022型号的键盘中心和底部的温度可以达到45℃,而2023型号的温度只有40℃。它也比Zephyrus G14的平均温度。
新鲜空气从键盘的左侧和右侧进入,使手指在游戏时保持凉爽。然而,即使只是在浏览网页或流媒体时,掌托仍会变得有点热。
值得注意的是,Razer交流电适配器比大多数其他交流电适配器要热得多。为了安全起见,你要让适配器远离任何对温度敏感的物品。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.7 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.8 °C / 94.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.9 °C / -10.6 F).
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -12% | -3% | -3% | -5% | -6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.4 | 40.6 -9% | 47 -26% | 43 -15% | 51.3 -37% | 41.6 -11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.2 | 42.6 -21% | 46.5 -32% | 46.4 -32% | 44.4 -26% | 55.7 -58% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33.2 | 38 -14% | 25.9 22% | 28.2 15% | 27.2 18% | 25.9 22% |
Idle Bottom * | 36.2 | 37 -2% | 28 23% | 28.4 22% | 26.6 27% | 28 23% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当在自定义极限性能模式下运行Prime95,最大风扇激活时,CPU将提升到4.8 GHz和88 W,仅在最初的几秒钟内稳定在4.5 GHz、80 W和89 C。在旧的2022年Blade 14上重复这一测试将导致更慢的时钟速率和更高的核心温度。
有趣的是,在关闭最大风扇模式下运行Witcher 3 ,帧率将返回与最大风扇模式开启类似的结果。因此,在大多数情况下,最大风扇模式对于冷却目的更有用,而不是最大化性能。进一步下降到平衡模式会更严重地影响性能。
我们能够记录到GPU板的平均功耗约为87W和109W,当运行 Witcher 3和《赛博朋克2077》时,我们能够记录到平均的GPU板功耗,分别为87W和109W,在自定义极限模式下。最高时,我们能够观察到在运行FurMark时的功耗为122W,而广告中的目标是140W。如果使用平衡电源配置文件,GPU的功耗似乎最高只有95W,因此建议至少在自定义极限模式下关闭最大风扇。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲(最大风扇开启) | -- | -- | 30 | 30 |
Prime95压力(最大风扇开启) | 4.5 | -- | 89 | 49 |
Prime95+FurMark压力(最大风扇开启) | 4.4 | 2310 | 80 | 62 |
Witcher 3 压力(最大风扇开启) | ~0.6 | 2310 | 75 | 67 |
Witcher 3 压力(最大风扇关闭) | ~0.6 | 2310 | 82 | 72 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~0.6 | 2280 | 82 | 73 |
发言人
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--低负荷时需求量更大
消耗功率
有趣的是,在最低功率设置下的桌面空转时,功耗几乎比去年的RTX 3070 Ti模型高2倍,这可能是下一节中电池寿命比预期短的原因。否则,游戏时的消耗将只是多出几瓦,以值得在图形性能上增加15%至25%。
运行Prime95给我们的Zen 4 CPU施加压力,将导致与去年的Zen 3+ 6900HX模型的功耗结果基本相同,正如下面的对比图所示,尽管CPU性能有世代的提高。CPU和GPU的每瓦性能绝对比2022年提供的要高一个档次。
Off / Standby | 0.74 / 1.3 Watt |
Idle | 19.5 / 24.7 / 27 Watt |
Load |
83.2 / 204.5 Watt |
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1440, 14.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14.00 | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | 22% | 20% | 34% | 37% | |
Idle Minimum * | 19.5 | 10.2 48% | 9.4 52% | 7.6 61% | 7.9 59% | 7.6 61% |
Idle Average * | 24.7 | 26 -5% | 14.2 43% | 12.3 50% | 11.1 55% | 13.3 46% |
Idle Maximum * | 27 | 26.7 1% | 14.5 46% | 17.6 35% | 11.8 56% | 13.7 49% |
Load Average * | 83.2 | 89.3 -7% | 79 5% | 111 -33% | 107.4 -29% | 88.2 -6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 165.8 | 158.7 4% | 172 -4% | 117.1 29% | 111 33% | 94.2 43% |
Load Maximum * | 204.5 | 227.5 -11% | 220.8 -8% | 245.8 -20% | 140.4 31% | 143 30% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 明显缩短的运行时间
虽然电池容量从去年的62瓦特略微增加到68瓦特,但较新机型的运行时间似乎要短得多。我们能够在现实世界中浏览的时间刚刚超过6小时,比2022年的Blade 14短了3个多小时。其他游戏笔记本电脑,如Zephyrus G14或 Alienware x14也能够在电池上持续更长时间。通过将显示器刷新率设置为60赫兹而不是默认的240赫兹,你可能会从电池中挤出更多的时间。我们的WLAN测试包括将两台笔记本电脑设置为平衡电源配置文件和相同的150 nit亮度,禁用RGB键盘背光。
使用随附的交流适配器,从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。第三方的USB-C适配器也可以用来给系统充电,尽管速度较慢。
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070 R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | Razer Blade 14 Ryzen 9 6900HX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 62 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Predator Triton 300 SE i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Alienware x14 i7 RTX 3060 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 51% | 9% | 9% | 10% | 21% | |
Reader / Idle | 513 | 732 43% | 486 -5% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 374 | 571 53% | 448 20% | 374 0% | 535 43% | 595 59% |
Load | 59 | 93 58% | 58 -2% | 77 31% | 45 -24% | 49 -17% |
H.264 | 431 | 561 | 742 | |||
Witcher 3 ultra | 45 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 所有正确的变化,但GeForce RTX 4090在哪里?
2023年的刀片14解决了对2022年机型的三个主要抱怨:没有USB4、16:10或可移动内存。这些具体的功能应该会让发烧友感到兴奋,他们可以真正利用电子GPU、更大的显示屏和额外的内存来满足他们的工作负荷。更快的CPU和GPU、更快的刷新率、更亮的显示屏、新的网络摄像头快门和更大的点击板是上面的樱桃。
这些新功能也不是没有缺点的。特别是,可移动的内存需要比以前稍厚的外形,而更高刷新率的显示器影响了电池寿命。如果使用高性能配置,风扇的噪音也会明显增大。幸运的是,这些优点可以说超过了较短的缺点清单。
2023年的Blade 14在内部和外部都进行了重大升级,比以前更好、更快。然而,它现在有点厚,而且缺少竞争对手的一些高端GPU选项。
也许新的Blade 14最大的缺点是缺乏大于RTX 4070的GPU选项。Zephyrus G14 及其125 W RTX 4090在游戏时比我们的140 W RTX 4070配置要好得多。这并不是说新的Blade 14很慢,但在这方面,14英寸性能的桂冠将不得不归于华硕。Razer的光滑的Apple ,继续成为其最强的卖点。
价格和可用性
雷蛇现在正在发货2023年刀片14的RTX 4060选项起价2400美元,RTX 4070选项起价2700美元。
Razer Blade 14 RTX 4070
-
06/16/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.