Notebookcheck Logo

联想Tab M8 2023(第四代)LTE平板电脑--经济型8英寸平板电脑的性能降级版

吹来吹去。 我们还没有完成对第三代联想Tab M8的评论,联想就已经推出了第四代设备。有一些事情发生了变化,无论是设计方面还是内部。我们对联想Tab M8第四代的评论显示,变化不一定总是改进。
Android ARM Tablet
联想Tab M8 2023 (第四代)

8英寸的外形尺寸非常方便,因为这种尺寸的平板电脑可以存放在一个小包里。由于支持手机和电话功能,如果有必要,该设备可以取代智能手机,使这种外形尺寸提供了一个有趣的折衷方案。

Tab M8 2023已经是联想经济实惠的8英寸平板电脑家族的第四代产品,在审查时,价格低于100美元(非LTE型号),在各零售商处上市,设备编号为TB300FU(WiFi版本)和TB300XU(LTE版本)。我们审查了LTE版本,想知道最新一代产品有什么变化。

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Tab M Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 4 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A53
Graphics adapter
PowerVR GE8300
Memory
3 GB 
Display
8.00 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel 189 PPI, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB eMMC Flash, 32 GB 
, 20 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5mm port, Card Reader: microSD up to 128 GB, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: proximity sensor, acceleration sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (B2/​B3/​B5/​B8), 3G (B1/​B2/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41), LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9 x 198 x 120
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Secondary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, bumper, charger, USB cable, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
320 g
Price
149 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
79.5 %
05/2023
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300
320 g9 mm8.00"1280x800
80.8 %
02/2023
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320
305 g8.15 mm8.00"1280x800
80.4 %
01/2023
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
MT8169A, Mali-G52 MP2
337 g9.7 mm8.00"1280x800
82.2 %
02/2023
Nokia T10
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
375 g9 mm8.00"1280x800
79.7 %
08/2021
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320
366 g8 mm8.70"1340x800

外壳 - 瘦身后的金属底盘

就像它的前辈一样,Tab M8第四代是一款非常轻的平板电脑:它的重量为320克,比例如诺基亚T10的重量要轻得多。 诺基亚T10三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite.

这款第四代平板电脑在外观上一眼就能看出:一方面,Tab M8的后侧有一个全新的设计,是对Tab M9的点头。Tab M9.这个区域的三分之二被三角形图案所覆盖,而顶部的三分之一是完全光滑的,是联想标志的所在地。总的来说,机身略带纹理,由金属制成,这有助于给Tab M8 2023带来高档的外观。

上一代产品,即Tab M8第三代,实际上要更薄一些。然而,这次联想已经设法缩小了显示屏的框架。总的来说,这有助于机箱享有一个更紧凑的形式。然而,当谈到这两款设备之间的差异时,我们谈论的是毫米。

这款平板电脑的稳定性令人印象深刻,虽然有可能出现轻微的扭曲,但寻找吱吱作响的声音却无果而终。

联想Tab M8 2023
联想Tab M8 2023
联想Tab M8 2023
联想Tab M8 2023
联想Tab M8 2023

尺寸比较

212.5 mm 124.7 mm 8 mm 366 g208 mm 123.2 mm 9 mm 375 g202 mm 137 mm 9.7 mm 337 g199.1 mm 121 mm 8.15 mm 305 g198 mm 120 mm 9 mm 320 g210 mm 148 mm 1 mm 2.9 g

特点 - 也可提供更多的存储空间

一般来说,你不应该对低于150美元的内存或大容量存储方式抱有太大期望。尽管如此,联想为其Tab M8第四代(RRP)提供了各种选择:

  • 联想Tab M8第四代WiFi - 32GB存储,3GB内存:108美元
  • 联想Tab M8第四代WiFi--64GB存储,4GB内存:149美元
  • 联想Tab M8第四代LTE--32GB存储,3GB内存:161美元

目前,配备LTE和64GB存储空间的变体在中欧地区还没有上市。因此,出厂价格非常相似,有时甚至比前代产品更低。

同样,这款平板电脑有一个USB-C接口,也有一个3.5毫米音频插孔。对于这样一款灵巧的平板电脑,一个NFC芯片可能是值得的,但联想决定不这样做。

左边:SIM卡插槽
左边:SIM卡插槽
右边:音量摇杆,待机按钮
右边:音量摇杆,待机按钮
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,扬声器
顶部:3.5毫米音频插孔,扬声器
底部:扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风
底部:扬声器、USB-C端口、麦克风

微型SD卡读卡器

microSD读卡器可以处理高达128GB的卡。我们对microSD Angelbird V60参考卡的测试显示,其数据传输速度与该类别的同类设备相当。然而,在三星Galaxy Tab A7 Lite证明有可能从该卡中挤出更多的东西。

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
53.2 MB/s +102%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
29.6 MB/s +13%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
26.3 MB/s
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s -22%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash (Angelbird V60)
17.5 MB/s -33%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø33.7 (16.9-41.5)
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø23.8 (12.8-39.1)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø29.4 (20.1-35.9)
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (25.8-45.2)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø34.8 (22.7-43.5)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.1 (13.8-75.1)
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø75.8 (13.3-83.9)
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.9 (34.2-84.6)
Nokia T10 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø71.2 (36.7-79.1)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Toshiba Exceria Pro M501: Ø76.1 (48.6-80.9)

软件 - 更新至2026年

Android 12预装在平板电脑上,与前代产品相比有一个优势:第四代产品以更现代的 版本启动,据制造商称,该设备将在2023年第三季度收到 13的更新。Android Android

此外,安全补丁计划到2026年,尽管这些补丁发生的频率很低。在审查时,我们的第四代Tab M8不得不与2023年1月的安全更新做斗争。

令人高兴的是,联想在该平板电脑上安装了纯粹的Android ,而且该设备基本上没有第三方应用程序。

联想Tab M8 2023软件
联想Tab M8 2023软件
联想Tab M8 2023软件

通信和GNSS--卓越的定位精度

Tab M8 2023有一个Wi-Fi和一个LTE版本,我们的评测设备能够连接到蜂窝网络,甚至可以通过扬声器或耳机打电话。然而,只有一个SIM卡插槽。

网络接收是体面的,但在我们的测试中,它并没有完全达到高端智能手机的水平。LTE频率的范围足以在欧洲运行,但对于更远的地方,我们建议检查目标目的地的移动互联网所需的频率。

Tab M8的每个型号都配备了Wi-Fi 5,这样一来,这款平板电脑就能管理这类设备的典型Wi-Fi速度。数据传输速度也非常稳定。 在路由器附近,接收效果非常好,在10米远的地方,有一半的信号强度可用,然后页面加载速度会慢一些。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
293 (287min - 299max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
342 (312min - 367max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
349 (337min - 355max) MBit/s +16%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
315 (289min - 337max) MBit/s +5%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
304 (279min - 315max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
301 (281min - 315max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
374 (360min - 392max) MBit/s +2%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
367 (347min - 379max) MBit/s
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
366 (351min - 381max) MBit/s 0%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
357 (333min - 367max) MBit/s -3%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø300 (281-315)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (347-379)
户外GPS测试
户外GPS测试
可用的卫星网络
可用的卫星网络

Tab M8 2023的Wi-Fi和LTE版本都有一个卫星跟踪模块,支持GPS、Glonass、Galileo和Beidou以及SBAS,以获得更大的准确性。走到户外,许多卫星被迅速探测到,我们被定位到准确位置的一米之内--这确实是一个非常好的价值。

不言而喻,我们也想在一个实际的测试环境中对该设备进行测试,所以我们开始了自行车旅行。我们的对比设备:Garmin Venu 2。Tab M8 2023在这方面也没有让人失望,它的定位准确,只是在狭窄的车道上稍有影响。这意味着这个方便的小平板电脑也可以作为一个导航设备使用。

联想Tab M8第4代位置 - 概述
联想Tab M8第4代位置 - 概述
联想Tab M8第四代的位置 - 转折点
联想Tab M8第四代的位置 - 转折点
联想Tab M8第四代的位置 - 桥梁
联想Tab M8第四代的位置 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2位置 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2位置 - 概述
Garmin Venu 2的位置 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2的位置 - 转折点
Garmin Venu 2位置 - 桥梁
Garmin Venu 2位置 - 桥梁

照相机--只有基础知识

前置摄像头照片
前置摄像头照片

平板电脑,尤其是那些低价位的平板电脑,并不以其相机照片的质量而闻名。乍一看,很明显,Tab M8第四代也不可能有什么不同:这里的相机功能与它的前辈一样,如背面的500万像素摄像头和正面的200万像素传感器。

后置主摄像头在处理逆光等困难情况时有问题,而且似乎经常不在其范围内。在光线不足的情况下,图像会失焦,黑暗区域也只是略微变亮。

1080p,30帧的视频是可能的,但这里的质量还有待提高。

前置摄像头也能拍出模糊的自拍照,头发等黑暗区域拒绝显示任何细节。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera BlumeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera LowLight

在完全的演播室照明下,主相机的能力同样不足,因为模糊的区域是可见的,细节会丢失。在光照度为1勒克斯时,图像完全是黑色的。

ColorChecker
8.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
11 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4): 7.45 ∆E min: 3.13 - max: 14.68 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.1 ∆E
54.8 ∆E
39.9 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
45.4 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36 ∆E
43.7 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
65.7 ∆E
64.3 ∆E
31.1 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4): 47.33 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 94.34 ∆E

附件和保证 - 包括一个保护盒

这款平板电脑配备了一个充电器、一条USB-C电缆和一个SIM卡工具。幸运的是,联想还附带了一个保护套,它有一个折叠式支架。

该制造商的平板电脑有24个月的只要是在欧盟购买。

输入设备和操作 - 并不总是准确的

基本上,这款平板电脑的60赫兹屏幕很容易使用,但在边缘的反应不是很灵敏。这意味着用户有时不得不重复某些手势,例如,在试图打开通知面板时。

在这个价格范围内,发现平板电脑缺乏指纹传感器是很正常的。然而,当我们进入安全菜单时,我们感到更加惊讶:面部解锁也是不可能的,这意味着没有生物识别方法来解锁该设备。

键盘人像
键盘人像
键盘景观
键盘景观

显示屏 - 更加明亮,但缺乏高清数据流

子像素图像
子像素图像

联想继续选择了1280 x 800像素的IPS显示屏,现在比上一代机型更亮一些。 Tab M8.这款平板电脑的平均亮度为380cd/m²,与同价位的同类产品相比,表现不错。低黑度也能给人留下深刻印象,让屏幕显示饱和的色彩。

然而,令人恼火的是,这款平板电脑只使用Widevine L3,使其无法以高清质量串流主要供应商的内容。

即使在低亮度下,我们也无法检测到任何PWM闪烁。

378
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
367
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
354
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 410 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 380 cd/m² Minimum: 2.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 410 cd/m²
Contrast: 2563:1 (Black: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 6.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
85.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.519
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
LCD, 1280x800, 8.00
Nokia T10
IPS, 1280x800, 8.00
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
TFT, 1340x800, 8.70
Screen
-62%
-18%
-44%
-28%
Brightness middle
410
353
-14%
388
-5%
446
9%
360
-12%
Brightness
380
330
-13%
364
-4%
429
13%
332
-13%
Brightness Distribution
86
81
-6%
90
5%
94
9%
85
-1%
Black Level *
0.16
0.64
-300%
0.36
-125%
0.65
-306%
0.24
-50%
Contrast
2563
552
-78%
1078
-58%
686
-73%
1500
-41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.6
6.5
-41%
4.38
5%
4.87
-6%
6.7
-46%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.03
11.36
-26%
10.7
-18%
9.85
-9%
12.4
-37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.3
7.3
-16%
2.9
54%
5.7
10%
7.6
-21%
Gamma
2.519 87%
2.118 104%
2.232 99%
2.189 101%
2.33 94%
CCT
7707 84%
8264 79%
6221 104%
7781 84%
8744 74%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17744 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

除了在我们用CalMAN软件进行的测试中,颜色有点太暗,以及存在轻微的蓝色色调外,这款平板电脑在色彩还原方面的得分相当高。

游戏者的响应时间显然太慢。

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
卡尔曼sRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN AdobeRGB色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
CalMAN DCI P3色彩空间
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
29.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.9 ms rise
↘ 17.3 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

在户外和阴天,显示屏的亮度不足以能够胜过显示屏上发现的强烈反光。

除了亮度略有下降外,可视角度令人印象深刻。

视角
视角
户外使用
户外使用

性能 - 几乎不值得一提

与前代产品相比,该SoC已经遭受了明显的倒退:那时,制造商选择了一个 联发科Helio P22有8个核心,最高频率为2.3GHz,而现在联想Tab M8第四代使用的是Helio A22有4个核心,最高频率为2GHz。已经可以猜到这在性能方面意味着什么。

联想Tab M8 2023正在打一场败仗,尤其是在多核应用方面:几乎所有的对比设备在基准测试中的速度都至少是其两倍。只有亚马逊Fire HD 8 2022和我们的评测设备一样慢。

在日常使用中,甚至在打开菜单时,这款平板电脑也没有享受到完全无卡顿的导航。更复杂的应用程序变成了几乎无法使用的图片幻灯片。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1892, n=74, last 2 years)
682 Points +387%
Nokia T10
310 Points +121%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
172 Points +23%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
160 Points +14%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (134 - 166, n=3)
146.7 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
140 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Points -100%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=74, last 2 years)
2435 Points +399%
Nokia T10
1256 Points +157%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
952 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
920 Points +89%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (439 - 541, n=3)
489 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
488 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1416727, n=55, last 2 years)
462027 Points +398%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
135453 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
117837 Points +27%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
92766 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ()
92766 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Tablet (3195 - 17267, n=70, last 2 years)
8917 Points +87%
Nokia T10
6916 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
5221 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5120 Points +7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
5028 Points +5%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (4766 - 4888, n=2)
4827 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
4766 Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=59, last 2 years)
721 Points +264%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
198 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ()
198 Points 0%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Points -100%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet (444 - 8886, n=56, last 2 years)
3675 Points +275%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1310 Points +34%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
979 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (744 - 986, n=7)
914 Points -7%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
444 Points -55%
System
Average of class Tablet (1103 - 14097, n=56, last 2 years)
6630 Points +304%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
3082 Points +88%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
2793 Points +70%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
1641 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (1419 - 1798, n=7)
1584 Points -3%
Memory
Average of class Tablet (916 - 10049, n=56, last 2 years)
4349 Points +277%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
1270 Points +10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
1236 Points +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
1154 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (531 - 1458, n=7)
1119 Points -3%
Graphics
Average of class Tablet (580 - 31738, n=56, last 2 years)
6722 Points +1059%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
1182 Points +104%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
928 Points +60%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
580 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (470 - 580, n=7)
491 Points -15%
Web
Average of class Tablet (10 - 1907, n=56, last 2 years)
1215 Points +45%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
836 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (715 - 1037, n=7)
834 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
811 Points -3%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
10 Points -99%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (84 - 156427, n=43, last 2 years)
4889 Points +5720%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
84 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ()
84 Points 0%

Legend

 
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761, PowerVR GE8300, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 MediaTek MT8169A, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia T10 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 32 GB eMMC Flash
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T, PowerVR GE8320, 32 GB eMMC Flash

Tab M8在图形性能方面也没有什么令人信服的地方。许多现代应用程序甚至无法启动,但SoC毕竟是5年前的产品。此外,在几乎所有可能的测试中,Tab M8第四代发现自己处于底部,而且是以一定的幅度。

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +38%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +40%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
29 fps +123%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
20 fps +54%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
13 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
16 fps +119%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +51%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.3 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
21 fps +110%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +40%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
10 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
9.8 fps +96%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +168%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.7 fps +39%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4.1 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.8 fps +73%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.4 fps +55%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2.2 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.1 fps +129%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
6.6 fps +113%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.2 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps +61%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
3.1 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4.1 fps +356%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps +122%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps +67%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1.5 fps +67%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.9 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
12 fps +140%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +120%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +62%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.9 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
7.7 fps +208%
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps +120%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4.2 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
4 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2.5 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nokia T10
Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.84 fps +110%
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.65 fps +63%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
0.4 fps
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
2061 Points +307%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
507 Points
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
Mali-G52 MP2, MT8169A, 32 GB eMMC Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
748 Points +65%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
454 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
863 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
674 Points -22%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
1214 Points +125%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
539 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
871 Points +80%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
485 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
PowerVR GE8300, Helio A22 MT6761, 32 GB eMMC Flash
879 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
PowerVR GE8320, Helio P22T MT8768T, 32 GB eMMC Flash
806 Points -8%

浏览器基准测试为Tab M8 2023提供了一线希望,该设备甚至设法确保第一名,领先于其同行。

然而,在实践中,我们的观察很快抑制了这种积极性:页面的加载时间非常长。然而,即使有1000MBit的连接,你也可以期待等待很长时间,特别是图片。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=66, last 2 years)
96.4 Points +374%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
23.534 Points +16%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)
20.317 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
18.53 Points -9%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (13.4 - 20.3, n=6)
15.8 Points -22%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=64, last 2 years)
92.5 Points +285%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
25 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)
24 Points
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 ()
24 Points 0%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (34 - 430, n=48, last 2 years)
134.4 Points +245%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)
39 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
35 Points -10%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
34 Points -13%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (30 - 39, n=6)
34 Points -13%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (48 - 572, n=60, last 2 years)
101 runs/min +587%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
15.76 runs/min +7%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chome 112)
14.71 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (12.5 - 15.7, n=5)
14.6 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
13.9 runs/min -6%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (2672 - 105178, n=81, last 2 years)
25897 Points +414%
Nokia T10 (Chrome 109)
9871 Points +96%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
5843 Points +16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
5156 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)
5041 Points
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen) (Chrome 109)
5004 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (3920 - 5041, n=8)
4513 Points -10%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite (Chrome 92.0.4515.115)
12972 ms * -39%
Average Mediatek Helio A22 MT6761 (9310 - 12215, n=6)
10624 ms * -14%
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022 (Silk Browser 106)
9435.4 ms * -1%
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) (Chrome 112)
9310.1 ms *
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=67, last 2 years)
3160 ms * +66%

* ... smaller is better

凭借其eMMC闪存,Tab M8 2023也无法与它的经济型竞争对手拉开距离,但仍能保持在同级别的水平。你不应该期待快速的加载时间或快速的数据传输。

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)Amazon Fire HD 8 2022Nokia T10Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LiteAverage 32 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-38%
-25%
52%
1%
-25%
286%
Sequential Read 256KB
269.6
262.1
-3%
270.37
0%
273.5
1%
271.1
1%
Sequential Write 256KB
190.5
66.7
-65%
113.44
-40%
191.5
1%
87.2
-54%
100.5 ?(14.8 - 196, n=247)
-47%
Random Read 4KB
67
50.8
-24%
39.46
-41%
71.4
7%
60.8
-9%
Random Write 4KB
23.9
9.9
-59%
19.81
-17%
71.5
199%
39.51
65%

游戏--最低标准的游戏

由于其低级别的性能,游戏测试也很困难:许多游戏拒绝启动,只有10年前的Asphalt 8愿意合作。这款游戏在低细节设置下可以在29fps左右播放。更高的设置会导致帧率大幅下降,在涉及快速赛车游戏时就会出现问题。

PUBG移动版由于其各种设置选项,也是可玩的。然而,当游戏挣扎着运行在20fps时,这就不好玩了,即使在最低设置下。我们使用Gamebench软件来测量帧率。

PUBG手机
PUBG手机
沥青8
沥青8
051015202530Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); Asphalt 8: Airborne; very low; 7.1.0m: Ø29.2 (26-31)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); Asphalt 8: Airborne; high; 7.1.0m: Ø23.1 (11-30)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.5.0: Ø19.7 (4-26)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); PUBG Mobile; Balanced; 2.5.0: Ø16.1 (3-24)

排放 - 无节制

温度

GFXBench压力测试
GFXBench压力测试

即使在广泛的负载时期,平板电脑也没有真正发热,最高达到30.1℃。

不幸的是,SoC在3DMark压力测试中挣扎,这意味着我们不得不转向GFXBench。在这里,我们看到即使在连续的负载下也有一致的性能水平。

Max. Load
 26.5 °C24.5 °C24.6 °C 
 28.6 °C24.7 °C24.7 °C 
 27.6 °C24.8 °C24.8 °C 
Maximum: 28.6 °C
Average: 25.6 °C
24 °C25.4 °C26.9 °C
24.3 °C25.1 °C30.1 °C
24.2 °C25.7 °C29.7 °C
Maximum: 30.1 °C
Average: 26.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 19.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.1 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
热图前沿
热图前沿
热图后部
热图后部

发言人

至少联想Tab M8有两个真正的立体声扬声器供其使用,但由于它们彼此之间的距离很近,其效果相当有限。然而,如果需要,扬声器可以变得相对响亮,尽管它们听起来有些空洞,但考虑到价格类别,它们仍然很好。

除了3.5毫米音频插孔外,蓝牙5.0也在机上,确保与外部音频设备的连接。说到编解码器,几乎所有的标准配置都有提供:SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD和LDAC。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.433.92528.229.63126.623.74026.631.15032.432.76322.520.9801717.510025.524.612521.224.816019.129.62001536.225014.742.431513.748.940011.357.150014.75563016.264.780016.571.5100014.372.6125012.169.2160011.665.4200011.164.7250013.660.2315021.460.6400024.867.550002873.6630023.470.3800023.163.51000020.865.21250023.455.8160002238.2SPL33.580.2N1.545.3median 16.5median 60.6Delta4.411.541.739.831.831.326.525.423.624.438.536.93028.127.625.424.527.414.831.418.345.115.944.216.651.515.353.714.25815.161.714.164.112.572.414.773.915.173.814.77414.371.514.771.514.576.914.376.414.176.214.372.414.468.614.366.214.356.413.148.426.785.50.861.3median 14.5median 66.20.710.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 82% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 83% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--低负荷下的高消耗

能源消耗

在低负载情况下,Tab M8 2023需要相对较高的能量,但仍能在高性能水平上控制自己。在我们的测试中,耗电量保持非常稳定。

这款平板电脑可以处理最大10瓦的充电功率,这意味着它可能需要3个小时才能将5100毫安时的电池完全充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.7 / 1.9 / 2.4 Watt
Load midlight 3 / 3.9 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
5100 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5100 mAh
Power Consumption
18%
-21%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
1.2
29%
0.78
54%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.4
26%
2.88
-52%
Idle Maximum *
2.4
1.7
29%
2.91
-21%
Load Average *
3
2.5
17%
4
-33%
Load Maximum *
3.9
4.3
-10%
6.04
-55%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.922.22.42.62.833.23.33.5Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4): Ø3.55 (2.98-3.72)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.40.60.70.91.11.31.51.71.822.22.42.62.82.93.13.33.5Tooltip
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.33 (3.09-3.68)
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø2 (1.949-2.38)

电池寿命

在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,这款平板电脑的电池寿命为15.29小时,相当不错,但仍然比它的前辈以及这个价格范围内的一些其他平板电脑差一些。其他的运行情况还可以,没有突出的问题。

总而言之,在中等负荷下,有可能使用联想Tab M8 2023好几天,与其他廉价平板电脑相比,在电池寿命方面没有看到任何明显的差异。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
37h 03min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 38min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 49min
Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4)
5100 mAh
Lenovo Tab M8 (3rd Gen)
5000 mAh
Amazon Fire HD 8 2022
4850 mAh
Nokia T10
5250 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 Lite
5100 mAh
Battery Runtime
4%
1%
6%
-4%
Reader / Idle
2223
2463
11%
H.264
998
800
-20%
WiFi v1.3
929
962
4%
935
1%
984
6%
803
-14%
Load
229
245
7%

Pros

+ 得体的立体声扬声器
+ 智能金属外壳
+ 明亮的显示屏,没有PWM
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 纯粹Android
+ 散发热量低
+ 非常精确的定位功能
+ 支持LTE,具有电话功能

Cons

- 不可能有高清流
- 非常低级的性能
- 有时不精确的触摸屏
- 不经常更新
- 没有生物识别解锁功能
- 不适合游戏
- 非常差的摄像头

结论 - Tab M8 2023有一个性能问题

已审查:联想Tab M8 2023(第四代)。评测设备由以下单位提供:
已审查:联想Tab M8 2023(第四代)。评测设备由以下单位提供:
cyberport.de

联想是怎么想的?即使是联想Tab M8 2023(第四代)的前身,就其价位而言也是一款相当慢的平板电脑。而现在,联想只是设法为其继任者配备了一个更慢的SoC。

否则,肯定已经取得了一些进展:听起来不错的立体声扬声器,更紧凑的外壳,出色的定位功能,更现代的软件和更明亮的显示屏。然而,尽管拥有更强大的电池,但电池寿命却更短,而且也没有面部解锁功能。

当谈到其第五代平价平板电脑时,联想将不得不为其设备配备更强大的组件,因为目前这款平板电脑已经无望地被该类平板电脑的同行们甩在身后。

联想Tab M8 2023(第四代)LTE是一款具有手机功能的低价位平板电脑,在性能上肯定吝啬了太多。

上一代产品,即联想Tab M8 2022 (Gen 3)提供了一个更全面的包装,但也不完全是最快的平板电脑。诺基亚T10提供了明显更多的动力。

价格和可用性

在审查时,联想Tab M8的32GB大容量、Wi-Fi版本可以在联想的网上商店买到,价格略低于95美元

目前,64GB大容量存储型号的价格要高得多,而且很难买到。即使在联想自己的网上商店,这款平板电脑的型号目前也无法买到。

Lenovo Tab M8 (Gen 4) - 05/11/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
82 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
64 / 80 → 79%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
41 / 70 → 58%
Weight
86 / 40-88 → 96%
Battery
90%
Display
83%
Games Performance
3 / 78 → 4%
Application Performance
38 / 92 → 41%
Temperature
96%
Noise
100%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Average
67%
80%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 联想Tab M8 2023(第四代)LTE平板电脑--经济型8英寸平板电脑的性能降级版
Florian Schmitt, 2023-05-16 (Update: 2024-05-28)