宏碁Predator Helios 16笔记本电脑评测:一款拥有众多优势的安静游戏笔记本电脑
作为 掠夺者Helios 300作为Predator Helios 300的继任者,Predator Helios 16是宏碁最新推出的具有中端元素的高端游戏笔记本电脑。我们的评测机型选择了RTX 4060中端GPU,售价约为1700美元,SKU最高可达RTX 4080也有供应。宏碁的纯中端产品代表是Helios Neo 16和Nitro系列Nitro系列是入门级产品。相比之下Triton 16是宏碁的超薄游戏笔记本电脑。
此外,英特尔 酷睿i7-13700HX(55 瓦 TDP)、16 GB DDR5 内存(两个内存组)和 1 TB SSD(PCIe 4.0)。虽然也有迷你LED显示屏可供选择,但我们的机型配备的是普通LED背光IPS面板,正如我们的评测所示,它出人意料地采用了高端功能集。
竞争对手主要是联想的 Legion Pro 5但华硕 TUF GAMING A16、技嘉的 Aorus 15X和戴尔的 G15也在争夺最佳中端游戏笔记本电脑的头衔。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.5 % | 07/2023 | Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.1 % | 06/2023 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 27.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.9 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.2 % | 04/2023 | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 19.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
86.2 % | 02/2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 27 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
84.2 % | 06/2023 | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 26.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳:坚固耐用、低调内敛的宏碁游戏笔记本电脑
与前代产品一样Helios 16采用哑光黑色,主要由拉丝铝合金制成,只有底座和显示屏边缘由塑料制成,以避免导热材料的缺点。
在低调的外观上,显示器盖子和底部边框上的时尚Predator标志以及LED灯、向后的散热系统都是点睛之笔。光滑的表面可以很好地吸附指纹,同时装配和表面处理完美无瑕--没有吱吱作响的声音。
底座非常稳定,盖子可以轻微扭动,但即使施加有针对性的压力,我们也无法使图像失真。铰链固定得非常牢固,盖子几乎没有晃动,单手即可打开,角度可达~145°。总体而言,Predator Helios给人留下了非常坚实的印象。
Acer Predator Helios的厚度约为27毫米,重量不到2.6千克。对于拥有如此强劲散热系统的游戏机而言,这些重要数据可被视为平均值。然而,尽管高度相同,但重量仅为2.2千克的华硕TUF GAMING A16要轻很多,而19.7毫米厚的技嘉Aorus 15X尽管拥有相同的TGP,华硕TUF GAMING A16却要比技嘉Aorus 15X薄得多。
特点Helios 16提供丰富的端口选择和快速的Killer Wi-Fi功能。
宏碁游戏笔记本电脑拥有众多端口,包括5个USB端口。左侧有1个USB-A 3.1 (5 GBit/s),右侧有2个USB-A 3.2 (10 GBit/s),后部有2个Thunderbolt 4,包括DisplayPort 1.4和Power Delivery (100瓦)。笔记本电脑还配备了千兆以太网、microSD读卡器、3.5毫米音频插孔、Kensington锁、HDMI 2.1和充电连接器。
SD卡读卡器
搭配我们的AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡,microSD读卡器的速度不一定很慢,但也不是很快,考虑到Helios 16的价格标签,这是一个遗憾。然而,在我们的竞争对手中(至少是配备读卡器的设备),读取和复制数据的速度都差不多快。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
通讯
英特尔Killer AX1675i Wi-Fi 6E芯片负责无线网络传输,最高运行速度可达1.6 GBit/s,比安装的千兆RJ45端口(Killer 2600)更快,因为它不支持2.5 GBit/s。Legion Pro 5 16和TUF GAMING A16尤其是Pro 5 16和TUF Gaming A16落后于Helios 16一些。搭载蓝牙5.2。
网络摄像头
在良好的照明条件下,1080p网络摄像头能够提供非常出色的图像。在背光条件下(在本例中,背光来自没有额外光源的侧窗),图像质量会急剧下降。支持Windows Hello,但没有物理摄像头快门。
配件
宏碁额外提供了两个浅灰色磁性风扇格栅,以替换预装的深灰色风扇格栅。如果有更多冒险的颜色点缀,那就更有趣了。除此之外,只有330瓦的PSU。制造商没有采用环保包装。
右边的照片适用于目前在德国宏碁商店出售的Predator游戏套装。
维护
拧松10颗Torx T5螺丝后,就可以轻松进入机箱内部。可更换的部件包括内存(两组)、M.2 2280固态硬盘和Wi-Fi芯片。不过,螺丝电池和BIOS电池也可以轻松更换。
质保
在德国,宏碁提供24个月的保修服务。Acer Care Plus可将保修期延长至五年。
输入设备:Predator Helios配有微型LED照明灯
键盘
宏碁自 2020 年以来一直使用相同的 6 排 Chiclet 键盘,按键尺寸为 15 x 15 毫米。2020 型号.尽管键程很大,但反馈并没有完全发挥其潜力:按压点是有形的,可以更清晰一些,但打字噪音并不明显。在中间和右侧,键盘弯曲明显,但只要不敲击键盘,打字时并不恼人。
迷你LED背光是全新设计,提供多种不同设置。单键RGB有四种可用设置,可以变得非常明亮。过渡特别平滑简洁,同时迷你LED也更加节能。
我们喜欢它的布局,尤其是正常大小的方向键,但换挡键却比较小。徽标按钮可启动Predator Sense应用程序,而使用键盘上方左侧的按钮则可在性能模式之间进行切换。
触摸板
由于采用了大猩猩玻璃涂层,手指在12.6 x 8.3毫米的触摸板上滑动非常流畅,反馈非常精确。因此,多点触控手势和滚动操作均可轻松完成。集成的点击按钮行程适中,反馈效果令人满意。
显示器:97 % DCI P3、500 cd/m²、240 Hz的游戏机
型号为PH16-711-731Q的评测设备没有配备可选的迷你LED显示屏及其1024个调光区。然而,令我们感到惊讶的是,这款快速、240赫兹、哑光IPS、2560 x 1600像素分辨率(16:10)的面板竟然覆盖了97%的DCI P3色彩空间。这意味着游戏中的图像和其他图像看起来更加生动。
所有其他关键数据看起来也不错:亮度略低于500 cd/m²,对比度高达1:419:1,亮度均匀度为94%。此外,不使用可能导致眼睛疲劳或头痛的 PWM,Acer Nitro 16 是我们的竞争设备列表中亮度明显超过 ~300 cd/m² 的唯一竞争对手。
13.6毫秒的灰阶到灰阶响应时间和6.4毫秒的黑阶到白阶响应时间与同类产品相近,其中戴尔G15 5530 的灰阶到灰阶响应时间仅为3.4毫秒,遥遥领先。此外,还支持Nvidia G-Sync和Dolby Vision。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 511 cd/m²
Contrast: 1419:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.56
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.33
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q BOE NE160QDM-NZ2, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 BOE CQ NE16QDM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15X ASF BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Dell G15 5530 AUO B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | -14% | -16% | -16% | -13% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.1 | 67.9 -30% | 71.2 -27% | 69.3 -29% | 69.4 -29% | 73.1 -25% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.1 -1% | 98.8 -1% | 98.2 -2% | 97.8 -2% | 98.4 -2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 84.7 | 69.9 -17% | 73.3 -13% | 70.5 -17% | 70.9 -16% | 74.4 -12% |
Response Times | 21% | -35% | -19% | -42% | 46% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13.6 ? | 11 ? 19% | 14.5 ? -7% | 12.4 ? 9% | 17 ? -25% | 3.39 ? 75% |
Response Time Black / White * | 6.4 ? | 5 ? 22% | 10.4 ? -63% | 9.4 ? -47% | 10.1 ? -58% | 5.35 ? 16% |
PWM Frequency | 21620 ? | |||||
Screen | -3% | 4% | 5% | 5% | -50% | |
Brightness middle | 511 | 520 2% | 405.7 -21% | 316 -38% | 308 -40% | 320 -37% |
Brightness | 498 | 494 -1% | 368 -26% | 301 -40% | 293 -41% | 316 -37% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 91 -3% | 87 -7% | 90 -4% | 90 -4% | 94 0% |
Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.39 -8% | 0.38 -6% | 0.28 22% | 0.23 36% | 0.21 42% |
Contrast | 1419 | 1333 -6% | 1068 -25% | 1129 -20% | 1339 -6% | 1524 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.76 | 1.94 -10% | 1.65 6% | 1.54 12% | 1.47 16% | 4.55 -159% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 5.62 -52% | 4.2 -14% | 2.46 34% | 2.98 19% | 9.83 -166% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.56 | 0.74 53% | 0.53 66% | 1.21 22% | 1.02 35% | 1.51 3% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 2.94 2% | 1.2 60% | 1.3 57% | 2.2 27% | 6.2 -107% |
Gamma | 2.33 94% | 2.37 93% | 2.3 96% | 2.307 95% | 2.228 99% | 2.07 106% |
CCT | 6341 103% | 6443 101% | 6453 101% | 6456 101% | 6228 104% | 6479 100% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
-2% | -15% /
-6% | -10% /
-3% | -18% /
-6% | -6% /
-29% |
* ... smaller is better
由于100%的sRGB、97.1%的DCI P3和84.7%的AdobeRGB色彩空间都被覆盖,因此照片和视频编辑这两项都依赖于准确的色彩。除了sRGB色彩空间之外,在我们的对比领域中,没有一款游戏笔记本电脑能够接近这些数字。
开箱即用的色彩和灰度已经校准,因此不会超过DeltaE 3的限制,人眼可以检测到的色彩偏差不超过这个限制。我们的校准成功地进一步提高了这些值,并且没有明显的偏色。我们的校准色彩配置文件可在下载。.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.2 ms rise | |
↘ 7.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17898 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
在室外,无论是阴凉处还是半阴凉处,屏幕都清晰易读。在阳光直射下,即使是雾面显示屏和500 cd/m²的亮度也不一定有帮助。
IPS面板的典型特点是可视角度稳定,无论是从上方、下方还是侧面。
性能:RTX 4060在100瓦时已达到最大时钟速度。
我们的评测配置宏碁掠夺者Helios 16拥有英特尔 酷睿i7-13700HX(8个P核+8个E核)、16GB DDR5 4800内存、1TB SSD硬盘(PCIe 4.0)和Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060最大TGP(140瓦)。其他SKU配备 酷睿i9-13900HX(8个P核+16个E核)、一个RTX 4070或 RTX 4080.
评测机型的目标市场是那些不需要以最高帧率或设备的原生QHD分辨率玩当前游戏的玩家。其他图形应用,如4K视频编辑或3D渲染,都可以通过该型号轻松实现。
测试条件
在宏碁的控制中心软件 "PredatorSense "中,有四种性能模式可供选择,可通过键盘上方左侧的按钮进行选择。我们使用 "性能 "模式进行了基于性能的基准测试。拔下电源插头后,该模式自动切换为 "平衡 "模式。生态 "模式也可在此使用,该模式可降低屏幕亮度,并关闭所有形式的LED照明。Helios 16必须充电至至少40%才能控制性能模式。
下表显示,在 "平衡 "模式下,电量几乎没有损失,风扇也保持相当低的噪音,事实上,几乎是令人愉悦的安静。相比之下,"Turbo "模式的噪音大得令人难以忍受,因此仅适用于长时间视频渲染或类似情况。
场景 | Turbo + Max 风扇 | Turbo | 性能 | 平衡 | 静音 | 电池 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CPU PL2 | 157 W (1:05 min) | 157 W > 150 W (1 min) | 157 W > 140 W (~55 sec) | 157 W > 135 W (~55 sec) | 157 W > 120 W (~40 sec) | 25 W |
CPU PL1 | 118 W | 115 W | 95 W | 85 W | 55 W | 25 W |
GPU @Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | 103 W | 100 W | 100 W | 90 W | 55 W | 37 W |
GPU @FurMark | 138 W | 137 W | 130 W | 100 W | 60 W | 40 W |
性能 (Cyperpunk 2077 1.6 @FHD/Ultra) | 96.2fps | 95.5fps | 93.2fps | 87.4fps | 65.8fps | 30fps |
处理器
英特尔 酷睿i7-13700HX处理器拥有16个内核和24个线程(8个P核+8个E核),TDP为55瓦。4.5GHz的涡轮并没有完全被利用,在第一分钟,P-cores位于3GHz和3.9GHz之间,然后分别降至1.9GHz(涡轮模式)和1.3GHz(性能模式)。
多核性能与相同CPU的竞争对手相当。Acer Nitro 16 和Asus TUF Gaming A16 中的8核AMDRyzen 7735HS 的性能明显优于它。在第五次运行Cinebench R15时,节流为15%,激活 "Turbo "模式几乎可以完全避免。可选的Core i9-13900HX 拥有两倍的 E 核,在多核任务中通常要快 33%。在电池模式下,情况不容乐观,因为25瓦的TDP限制意味着性能下降了近65%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (19987 - 22598, n=10) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (1666 - 1933, n=10) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (6889 - 8610, n=10) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (644 - 740, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (3008 - 3482, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (243 - 279, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (138 - 198, n=9) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (72220 - 89294, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (5552 - 6409, n=10) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (12389 - 15850, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (1666 - 1899, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (19.7 - 25.5, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36.5 - 52.9, n=10) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 300 (i7-12700H, RTX 3070 Ti) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (0.4274 - 0.493, n=10) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (15397 - 21999, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (77807 - 109364, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (3412 - 5053, n=10) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (105112 - 114717, n=10) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (10407 - 13519, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (38311 - 53484, n=10) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (72510 - 182575, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (981 - 1451, n=10) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (8145 - 11837, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (20471 - 42415, n=10) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
系统性能
在日常工作中,宏碁笔记本电脑的响应速度非常快。在播放4K YouTube视频时上网冲浪甚至不会让Intel-HX系统出汗。这意味着,在PCMark 10基准测试中,Predator Helios排名第一,紧随其后的是联想Legion Pro 5 16.
同样,在Mozilla Kraken 1.1和WebXPRT的测试中,凭借强大的单核性能,Predator Helios的网页浏览性能也达到了很高的水平。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Speedometer 2.0: Result
Octane V2: Total Score
Jetstream 2: Total Score
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (6909 - 7743, n=5) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9760 - 11313, n=5) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9131 - 11018, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9393 - 12434, n=5) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1663 - 2105, n=5) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1618 - 1989, n=5) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1710 - 2274, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1269 - 1983, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 824, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (495 - 538, n=5) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF |
Speedometer 2.0 / Result | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (225 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (300 - 343, n=3) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Octane V2 / Total Score | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 111243, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (86875 - 96413, n=3) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
Jetstream 2 / Total Score | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 369, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (263 - 305, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (238 - 336, n=4) | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (247 - 283, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7743 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36504 - 63990, n=10) | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (36510 - 69729, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (33598 - 85675, n=10) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13700HX (81.9 - 97.9, n=10) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
安装的PCIe 4.0 SSD Micron 3400可容纳1 TB。连续读取传输速率高达6100MB/s,高于平均水平。然而,在很短的时间后,与热有关的急剧节流就会启动,将速度降低到容量的三分之一。华硕ROG Flow X16和华硕ROG Flow X16所采用的Micron 3400都不存在节流问题。华硕ROG流X16或联想Legion 7但在惠普 ZBook Fury 16和 ZBook Firefly 14.
Pro 5 16 中的 SK Hynix PC801Legion Pro 5 16Pro 5 16中的SKynix PC801也可支持高达~6000 MB/s的传输速度,而戴尔G15 5530中的小型M.2 2242固态硬盘则可支持高达~6000 MB/s的传输速度。戴尔G15 5530则明显垫底。
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Dell G15 5530 SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -25% | -15% | -15% | -72% | -144% | |
Seq Read | 5246.2 | 5185.49 -1% | 5856.12 12% | 4649.46 -11% | 3976.53 -24% | 2603.73 -50% |
Seq Write | 4435.2 | 3900.46 -12% | 4750.28 7% | 3810.26 -14% | 3020.8 -32% | 494.63 -89% |
4K Read | 65.7 | 62.76 -4% | 77.12 17% | 100.75 53% | 49.25 -25% | 36.37 -45% |
4K Write | 242.1 | 137.9 -43% | 276.66 14% | 308.92 28% | 152.75 -37% | 188.64 -22% |
4K-64 Read | 2262.3 | 2593.07 15% | 2572.63 14% | 2964.13 31% | 1901.41 -16% | 932.26 -59% |
4K-64 Write | 2618.3 | 3195.33 22% | 3536.78 35% | 3103.89 19% | 1949.13 -26% | 276.64 -89% |
Access Time Read * | 0.023 | 0.079 -243% | 0.044 -91% | 0.068 -196% | 0.05 -117% | 0.103 -348% |
Access Time Write * | 0.019 | 0.029 -53% | 0.053 -179% | 0.012 37% | 0.105 -453% | 0.182 -858% |
Score Read | 2853 | 3174 11% | 3235 13% | 3530 24% | 2348 -18% | 1229 -57% |
Score Write | 3304 | 3723 13% | 4288 30% | 3794 15% | 2404 -27% | 515 -84% |
Score Total | 7575 | 8452 12% | 9125 20% | 9097 20% | 5903 -22% | 2271 -70% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 4030.7 | 3037.59 -25% | 566.62 -86% | 1039.04 -74% | 488.98 -88% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 1323.8 | 968.9 -27% | 1098.38 -17% | 439.84 -67% | 296.26 -78% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 2727 | 2239.37 -18% | 2670.4 -2% | 721.09 -74% | 452.22 -83% | |
DiskSpd | -22% | -3% | 9% | -31% | -57% | |
seq read | 3587 | 3520 -2% | 5346 49% | 3419 -5% | 2460 -31% | 2726 -24% |
seq write | 4634 | 2220 -52% | 1495 -68% | 3270 -29% | 2991 -35% | 535 -88% |
seq q8 t1 read | 6521 | 6661 2% | 7127 9% | 7018 8% | 4633 -29% | 2985 -54% |
seq q8 t1 write | 4962 | 2216 -55% | 4903 -1% | 4398 -11% | 3415 -31% | 539 -89% |
4k q1 t1 read | 68.3 | 48.4 -29% | 65.9 -4% | 73.5 8% | 35.5 -48% | 34 -50% |
4k q1 t1 write | 249 | 159.6 -36% | 328 32% | 346 39% | 181.3 -27% | 224 -10% |
4k q32 t16 read | 2848 | 3311 16% | 2889 1% | 3552 25% | 2025 -29% | 1054 -63% |
4k q32 t16 write | 2670 | 2193 -18% | 1457 -45% | 3610 35% | 2291 -14% | 507 -81% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-24% | -9% /
-11% | -3% /
-6% | -52% /
-55% | -101% /
-113% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡
Helios 16的Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060是一款拥有8GB VRAM的中端芯片,其最大TGP为140瓦(115瓦+25瓦Dynamic Boost)。然而,2570 MHz的最高时钟速度已经达到了100瓦。只有FurMark压力测试能够从GPU中获得约140瓦的功率。相比之下,在游戏时,RTX 4060笔记本电脑GPU的功耗从未超过100瓦。
性能相应地与其他配备RTX 4060的游戏笔记本电脑相似,例如Legion Pro 5 16和戴尔 G15 5530.......。 RTX 4070在Aorus 15X也相差无几。在电池模式下,合成基准测试结果减半。
3DMark 11 Performance | 31728 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 67374 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23631 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 10948 points | |
Help |
Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL | |
Aorus 15X ASF | |
Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 | |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q | |
Dell G15 5530 |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在《赛博朋克2077》@QHD/Ultra游戏中,宏碁掠夺者Helios 16能够在我们的竞争对手中遥遥领先,甚至略微领先于Pro 5 16。 Legion Pro 5 16'sRTX 4070.然而,在我们的性能评级中,所有竞争设备都与RadeonRX 7600S和 TUF Gaming A16略有下降。
切换到纯dGPU模式后,性能提升仅为3%。如果将其与涡轮增压模式相结合,性能提升将达到6%。在激活光线追踪的情况下,《赛博朋克2077》1.6 Ultra/FHD的帧数仍为60帧,而不是93.2帧。在激活DLSS(平衡)的情况下--这种情况下没有光线追踪--帧数为134.2fps。
在平衡性能模式下,帧率下降到87.4,考虑到风扇噪音明显降低,帧率是可以接受的。在电池模式下,帧速率下降了近70%,仅为30fps。使用 "DLSS最高性能",帧频有可能再次翻倍,从而使一些新游戏在电池模式下相对流畅地运行(并保持)。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 182.8 | 181.3 | 172.5 | 112.8 | 88.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 466 | 331 | 181.3 | 102.1 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 189.6 | 171.8 | 159.2 | 153 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 226 | 150.3 | 100.1 | 72.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 136.2 | 123.2 | 95.4 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 434 | 272 | 215 | 185.2 | 123.5 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 141 | 93 | |||
God of War (2022) | 134.4 | 112.3 | 89.4 | 64.6 | 53.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 132.5 | 126 | 114.9 | 93.2 | 58.6 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 219 | 175.1 | 114.7 | 87.9 | 60 |
F1 22 (2022) | 256 | 244 | 196.5 | 65.2 | 38 |
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 88 | 60 | |||
Returnal (2023) | 84.4 | 77.9 | 72.6 | 67 | 59.4 |
排放:宏碁掠夺者Helios 16拥有强大的冷却系统
噪声排放
在闲置状态下上网和执行简单的办公任务时,Predator Helios 16几乎始终保持着令人愉悦的静音效果。
在纯CPU负载情况下,达到36.6 dB(A),但也不会非常恼人。在游戏模式下,性能模式的噪音为49 dB(A),达到了游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平。在涡轮增压模式下,噪音大得令人难以忍受,却没有任何实际的附加值。相比之下,平衡模式的背景噪音几乎令人愉悦,而性能损失却很小。最后,在3D应用中,静音模式可降低约30%的噪音。
不过,我们的评测机型在充电时会产生明显的啸叫声。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 32.32 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.66 / 49.49 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 Radeon RX 7600S, R7 7735HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Dell G15 5530 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13650HX, SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 4% | -17% | -1% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 25.7 -7% | 23 4% | 25 -4% | 24 -0% | 20.41 15% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 25.7 -7% | 23.1 4% | 28 -17% | 24 -0% | 26.85 -12% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 25.7 -7% | 23.1 4% | 29 -21% | 25 -4% | 26.85 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 32.32 | 26.3 19% | 26.6 18% | 36 -11% | 28 13% | 26.85 17% |
Load Average * | 36.66 | 33.9 8% | 34.7 5% | 50 -36% | 42 -15% | 27.65 25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.06 | 47.6 3% | 54 -10% | 50 -2% | 47.9 2% | |
Load Maximum * | 49.49 | 62 -25% | 54.8 -11% | 58 -17% | 50 -1% | 47.86 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
宏碁的游戏笔记本电脑保持了惊人的低温,在游戏过程中,大部分表面的温度甚至没有达到40 °C。热量仅集中在后部突出的散热系统上,游戏时热点可达55 °C。仅在综合压力测试中,我们测得的热点温度为66 °C,尽管这在日常使用中不会发生。用户通常不会接触到后部的散热条,但如果将其放在腿上,在游戏时偶尔接触到该设备会让人感到不舒服。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 66 °C / 151 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.4 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.1 °C / -5.6 F).
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S | Dell G15 5530 Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 10% | 12% | 19% | -6% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41 | 41.5 -1% | 42.8 -4% | 42 -2% | 54 -32% | 54 -32% |
Maximum Bottom * | 66 | 51.8 22% | 50 24% | 51 23% | 47 29% | 62.2 6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 31.6 12% | 29.6 18% | 27 25% | 40 -11% | 33.4 7% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 34.5 7% | 34 8% | 26 30% | 40 -8% | 33.4 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试(FurMark + Prime95)中,一分钟后,P-cores时钟频率从3.6 GHz降至0.85 GHz,明显低于2.1 GHz的基本时钟频率。激活涡轮增压模式和 "最大风扇 "后,时钟频率仅在3分钟后下降(~1.1 GHz)。CPU的发热温度高达86 °C(分别为83 °C),持续功耗为100瓦。
GPU的时钟频率基本保持在2,500至2,600 MHz,温度不高(81 °C),功耗为115瓦。在Witcher 3 压力测试和几乎所有的游戏中,RTX 4060都保持了良好的性能。RTX 4060只需100瓦即可达到最大时钟频率。然而,在配备RTX 4080应该会有所不同。
在纯GPU压力测试(FurMark)中,GPU几乎持续达到2,430 MHz左右的最高时钟频率,功耗为129瓦,发热温度高达76 °C。在涡轮增压模式+最大风扇下,最高主频达到2625 MHz(轻微超频),功耗为136瓦(峰值139瓦),GPU温度保持在71.5 °C。
即使在纯 CPU 压力下,1 分钟后,P-cores 的时钟频率仅为 0.92 GHz,因为它被限制在 100 瓦,尽管 CPU 仅达到 70 °C。散热系统显然可以承受更高的温度。如果激活涡轮增压模式+最大风扇,在115瓦和73 °C的条件下,主频仍为1.45 GHz。如果能够选择PL限制,尤其是在选择带有Core i9-13900HX 的SKU时,将是明智之举。
@Performance Mode | P-Cores/ E-Cores Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度(°C) |
系统闲置 | 0,07 / 0,07 | - | 33 | 37 |
Prime95 Stress | 0,95 / 3,5 | 10 | 71 | 49 |
Prime95 + FurMark | 0,85 / 3,4 | 2.500 | 86 | 81 |
FurMark Stress | 0,55 / 0,02 | 2.450 | 54 | 76 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1,6 / 0,02 | 2.475 | 61 | 73 |
扬声器
向下发射的2瓦立体声扬声器可产生均衡的中高音,但低音几乎完全没有,76.1 dB(A)的最大音量也相当一般。在我们的对比领域中,游戏笔记本电脑的表现也不尽如人意。
作为替代选择华硕ROG Strix G16和联想的 Legion Pro 7提供更好的音效,或者您可以通过音频插孔或蓝牙使用耳机或音响系统。
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.12 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理:空耗高,电池寿命短
耗电量
即使是英特尔HX系统,20瓦的闲置功耗也非常高,而AMD HS系统在宏碁的竞争对手中表现最佳。
游戏时的175瓦功耗相对较低,但是几乎所有的RTX 4060笔记本电脑都达到了这一数值,因为GPU在100瓦时达到了最大时钟速度。只有在日常(非典型)压力测试中才会达到240瓦至276瓦,330瓦的PSU可以轻松承受。
Off / Standby | 0.6 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 15.9 / 20.5 / 20.9 Watt |
Load |
106 / 276 Watt |
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SSTC CL4-3D512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -24% | 6% | 29% | 18% | 13% | -1% | |
Idle Minimum * | 15.9 | 11.6 27% | 24.5 -54% | 11 31% | 8 50% | 8.4 47% | 13 ? 18% | 13.9 ? 13% |
Idle Average * | 20.5 | 15.6 24% | 29.2 -42% | 16 22% | 11 46% | 14.98 27% | 17.1 ? 17% | 19.2 ? 6% |
Idle Maximum * | 20.9 | 16.5 21% | 34.3 -64% | 24 -15% | 16 23% | 15.56 26% | 21.5 ? -3% | 27 ? -29% |
Load Average * | 106 | 155 -46% | 98.7 7% | 104 2% | 97 8% | 96.8 9% | 96.4 ? 9% | 111.4 ? -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 175 | 154.8 12% | 178.6 -2% | 185.4 -6% | 161.5 8% | 186 -6% | ||
Load Maximum * | 276 | 205 26% | 249.6 10% | 272 1% | 168 39% | 271.42 2% | 214 ? 22% | 251 ? 9% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Helios 16上网时的亮度为150 cd/m²,刷新率为120至240 Hz,电池续航时间为5.5小时多一点,大致达到游戏笔记本电脑的平均水平。AMD系统宏碁Nitro 16和华硕TUF GAMING A16的续航时间更长,分别为9小时和12小时。仅为3.5小时的Legion Pro 5 16落后。
半小时后,电池再次充电至50%,100%充电时间约为1.15小时。也可以通过USB-C接口为笔记本充电,但速度较慢。
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Acer Nitro 16 AN16-41 R7 7735HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 R7 7735HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 65% | -46% | 48% | 58% | -8% | 10% | |
H.264 | 286 | 614 115% | 472 65% | 405 42% | 400 ? 40% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 338 | 540 60% | 205 -39% | 489 45% | 724 114% | 391 16% | 367 ? 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 87 | 47 -46% | 80.6 ? -7% | ||||
Load | 88 | 105 19% | 41 -53% | 118 34% | 90 2% | 50 -43% | 84.3 ? -4% |
Reader / Idle | 729 | 401 | 679 | 1212 | 543 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论:坚固耐用的RTX 4060游戏笔记本也能保持安静
宏碁掠夺者Helios 16游戏笔记本电脑有许多优点,但也有一些较小的权衡。快速、色彩鲜艳、240 Hz QHD显示屏给我们带来了积极的惊喜,97%的DCI P3和杜比视界意味着没有什么能阻挡我们进行创造性工作。
英特尔HX CPU的强大性能与同样非常强大的RTX 4060,您将获得一款拥有众多高端元素的中端游戏笔记本电脑。
金属外壳也给我们留下了深刻的印象,尽管键盘面板有些弯曲。按键本身可以提供更多反馈,但相反,我们喜欢色彩鲜艳、节能的迷你LED按键照明。不过,电池续航时间一般,在使用选配的迷你LED显示屏时可能会更短,尤其是在与最强大的SKU(酷睿i9-13900HX)结合使用时。酷睿i9-13900HX+ RTX 4080).
高水平的性能、240 Hz的QHD显示屏以及游戏时的宁静,所有这些听起来都像是游戏笔记本电脑和创意工作站的理想配方。然而,我们必须接受一些取舍。
强大的散热系统有助于保持较低的内部温度,确保安静和稳定的性能,尤其是在平衡或安静模式下。我们怀念的是可单独定制的 "功率限制",以便将散热系统推向极限。与温度相关的固态硬盘节流似乎是一个瑕疵,在电池模式下,CPU的25瓦限制似乎过高。
目前,这款笔记本电脑的评测版本SKU价格分别为1900美元和1750美元,但偶尔也能买到更便宜的型号,价格约为1450美元,165 Hz显示屏色彩稍差。然而,通常可以找到其主要竞争对手,联想Legion Pro 5 16 ,价格约为1400美元,该设备提供几乎相同的优势。不同之处只体现在细节上,如没有高级Optimus,键盘更好,165 Hz QHD显示屏缺乏DCI P3覆盖。
此外,华硕ROG Strix G16 是一个有趣的选择,配备RTX 4060,价格也在1800美元左右。这项投资还将为您带来更好的扬声器、更长的电池续航时间、反馈更明显的键盘以及更快的显示响应时间。
价格和供货情况
Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q
-
07/05/2023 v7
Marvin Gollor
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.